Skip to main content

Constitutional Protection of Property: The Examples of the Czech Republic, France, the Russian Federation, and Switzerland

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism

Abstract

This article explores the protection of property in constitutional law and practice of four European countries with diverse constitutional history: the Czech Republic, France, Russia, and Switzerland. It provides an insight into the meaning and scope of the respective property protection clauses, including the constitutional criteria for interferences with property, and their interpretation by the respective constitutional jurisdictions. The national constitutional approaches are briefly set against the settled practice of the European Court of Human Rights with a view to identifying the extent to which they are in harmony and promote synergy in the area of protection of property as a fundamental right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexy, Robert. 2012. Rights and Liberties as Concepts. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, ed. M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajó, 283–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0015.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, Jean-François, and Pascal Mahon. 2003. Petit commentaire de la Constitution fédérale de la Confédération suisse du 18 avril 1999. Zurich, Bâle, Genève: Schulthess.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belov, Sergey. 2013. Russia: Foreign Transplants in the Russian Constitution and Invisible Foreign Precedents in Decisions of the Constitutional Court. In The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, ed. T. Groppi and M.-C. Ponthoreau, 347–371. Oxford-Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borisov, A.B. 2012. Kommentarii k Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi). S kommentariyami Konstitutsionnogo suda RF. Moscow: Yurlitinform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, William, Peter Maggs, and Gennady Danilenko. 2004. Law and Legal System of the Russian Federation. New York: Juris Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, William. 2003. Russian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conac, Gérard, Marc Debene, and Gérard Teboul. 1993. La déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen de 1789. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disant, Mathieu. 2011. Droit de la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité. Cadre juridique. Pratiques jurisprudentielles. Paris: Lamy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago, Guillaume. 2011. Contentieux constitutionnel français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekshtain, K. 2004. Osnovnye prava i svobody. Po rossiiskoi Konstitutsii i Evropeiskoi Konventsii. Utchebnoe posobie dlia vuzov. Moscow: NOTA BENE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goesel-Le Bihan, Valérie. 2001. Le contrôle exercé par le Conseil Constitutionnel: défense et illustration d'une théorie générale. Revue française de droit constitutionnel 45: 67–83. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfdc.045.0067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpérin, Jean-Louis. 2008. Histoire du droit des biens. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpovich, V.D. 2002. Kommentarii k Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow: Novaia pravovaia kultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert Abdelgawad, Elisabeth, and Anne Weber. 2008. The Reception Process in France and Germany. In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, ed. H. Keller and A. Stone Sweet, 107–165. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535262.003.0003.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, Thomas. 2003. La notion de droit fondamental dans les jurisprudences et doctrines constitutionnelles françaises et allemandes. Paris: L.G.D.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavageau, Stéphanie. 2006. Le droit de propriété dans les jurisprudences suprêmes françaises, européennes et internationales. Paris: L.G.D.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, Xavier. 1990. Le contrôle de proportionnalité dans les jurisprudences constitutionnelle et administrative françaises. Paris: PUAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Dominique. 1999. Droit du contentieux constitutionnel. Paris: Montchrestien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, Georg, and Bernd Tremml. 1994. Staathaftungs und Entschädigungsrecht. Munich: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starzhenetskiy, Vladislav. 2017. Property Rights in Russia: Reconsidering the Socialist Legal Tradition. In Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, ed. L. Mälksoo and W. Benedek, 295–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235075.012.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trochev, Alexei. 2008. Russia's Constitutional Spirit: Judge-Made Principles in Theory and Practice. In Russia and its Constitution: Promise and Political Reality. Law in Eastern Europe 58: 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004155350.i-208.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underkuffler, Laura. 2005. The Idea of Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasileva, S.V., V.A. Vinogradov, and V.D. Mazaev. 2010. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. Utchebnik. Moscow: Exmo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorkin, Valery. 2007. Rossia i Konstitutsia v XXI veke. Vzgliad s Ilinki. Moscow: Norma.

    Google Scholar 

Essential Readings

  • Burnham, William, Peter Maggs, and Gennady Danilenko. 2004. Law and Legal System of the Russian Federation. New York: Juris Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, William. 2003. Russian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starzhenetskiy, Vladislav. 2017. Property Rights in Russia: Reconsidering the Socialist Legal Tradition. In Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, ed. L. Mälksoo and W. Benedek, 295–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235075.012.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimíra Pejchal Grünwald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pejchal Grünwald, V. (2022). Constitutional Protection of Property: The Examples of the Czech Republic, France, the Russian Federation, and Switzerland. In: Cremades, J., Hermida, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_89-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_89-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31739-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics