Abstract
Today, there is near universal consensus on Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) as the preferred approach to medical practice. In palliative care, however, a strong evidence base is lacking in many respects which could result in less than optimal care being provided to patients. Establishing a solid evidence base requires much research to be conducted in palliative care. Such research in palliative care faces both empirical and ethical challenges. In this chapter we focus on several ethical issues and challenges that are relevant to palliative care research. Many legal and ethical frameworks for dealing with research ethical issues, but this chapter examines how these general frameworks apply more specifically to the domain of palliative care research. We will discuss the key issue of vulnerability in palliative care research. Other issues that will be touched upon are: (1) respect for research participants; (2) the need for independent review; (3) the requirement of social and/or scientific value; (4) issues related to informed consent; (5) challenges regarding scientific validity; (6) favourable risk-benefit ratio; and (7) fair participant selection. In touching upon these issues, most ethical challenges for palliative care research are examined. The chapter aims to show that although many ethical challenges may exist when conducting palliative care research, these challenges should in no way be deemed insurmountable. Research in palliative care is both needed and possible, provided sufficient attention is given to possible ethical sensibilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abernethy AP, Capell WH, Aziz NM, Ritchie C, Prince-Paul M, Bennet RE, et al. Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;48(6):1211–21.
Agrawal M, Grady C, Fairclough DL, Meropol NJ, Maynard K, Emanuel EJ. Patients’ decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4479–84.
Aoun SM, Kristjanson LJ. Challenging the framework for evidence in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2005;19(6):461–5.
Aoun SM, Nekolaichuk C. Improving the evidence base in palliative care to inform practice and policy: thinking outside the box. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;48(6):1222–35.
Appelbaum PS, Roth LH. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982;5:319–29.
Beller EM, van Driel ML, McGregor L, Truong S, Mitchell G. Palliative pharmacological sedation for terminally ill adults (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:1–40.
Bernabe RDLC, van Thiel GJMW, van Delden JJM. What do international ethics guidelines say in terms of the scope of medical research ethics? BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17(23):1–18.
Bothwell LE, Greene JA, Podolsky SH, Jones DS. Assessing the gold standard – lessons from the history of RCTs. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2175–81.
Bouça-Machado R, Rosário M, Alarcão J, Correia-Guedes L, Abreu D, Ferreira JJ. Clinical trials in palliative care: a systematic review of their methodological characteristics and of the quality of their reporting. BMC Palliat Care. 2017;16(10):1–12.
Bracken-Roche D, Bell E, Macdonald ME, Racine E. The concept of “vulnerability” in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(8):1–18.
Casarett DJ, Karlawish JHT. Are special ethical guidelines needed for palliative care research? J Pain Symptom Manag. 2000;20(2):130–9.
Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25): 1887–92.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. 4th ed. Geneva; 2016. Available at https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf.
Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(20): 2701–11.
Grady C. Payment of clinical research subjects. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115(7):1681–7.
Grande GE, Todd CJ. Why are trials in palliative care so difficult? Palliat Med. 2000;14:69–74.
Grossman J, Mackenzie FJ. The randomized controlled trial: gold standard, or merely standard? Perspect Biol Med. 2005;48(4):516–34.
Henderson GE, Churchill LR, Davis AM, Easter MM, Grady C, Joffe S, et al. Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Med. 2007;4(11):1735–8.
Hickman SE, Cartwright JC, Nelson CA, Knafl K. Compassion and vigilance: investigators’ strategies to manage ethical concerns in palliative and end-of-life research. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(8):880–9.
Higginson IJ. Evidence based palliative care: there is some evidence – and there needs to be more. Br Med J. 1999;319:462–3.
Higginson IJ. Research challenges in palliative and end of life care. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016;6(1):2–4.
Hudson P, Aranda S, Kristjanson LJ, Quinn K. Minimising gate-keeping in palliative care research. Eur J Palliat Care. 2005;12(4):165–9.
Kant I. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012 (1785).
Karlawish JHT. Measuring decision-making capacity in cognitively impaired individuals. Neurosignals. 2008;16(1):91–8.
Kars MC, van Thiel GJMW, van der Graaf R, Moors M, de Graeff A, van Delden JJM. A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2016;30(6):533–48.
Kelley AS, McGarry K, Fahle S, Marshall SM, Du Q, Skinner JS. Out-of-Pocket Spending in the Last Five Years of Life. National Bureau of Economic Research Bulletin on Aging and Health. 2010;2:3–4.
Lee S, Kristjanson LJ. Human research ethics committees: issues in palliative care research. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003;9(1):13–8.
Levine C, Faden RR, Grady C, Hammerschmidt D, Eckenwiler L, Sugarman J. The limitations of “Vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4(3):44–9.
Ling J, Rees E, Hardy J. What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre? Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:621–6.
Macklin R. On paying money to research subjects: “due” and “undue” inducements. IRB. 1981;3(5):1–6.
Miller FG, Joffe S. Benefit in phase 1 oncology trials: therapeutic misconception or reasonable treatment option? Clinical Trials: Journal of the Society for Clinical Trials. 2008;5(6):617–23.
Nickel PJ. Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill. Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(3): 245–64.
Nueberger J, Guthrie C, Aaronovitch D, Hameed K, Bonser T, Pentregarth H, et al. More care, less pathway: a review of the liverpool care pathway. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212450/Liverpool_Care_Pathway.pdf.
de Raeve L. Ethical issues in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 1994;8(4):298–305.
Rink GC, van den Bos GA, Kleijnen J, de Haes HJ, Schadé E, Veenhof CH. Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(4):1697–707.
Rothman DJ. Ethics and human experimentation. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1195–9.
Sackett DL. Evidence based medicine. Semin Perinatol. 1997;21(1):3–5.
Sharkey K, Savulescu J, Aranda S, Schofield P. Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis. J Med Ethics. 2010;36:363–6.
Sterckx S, Raus K, Mortier F. Continuous sedation at the end of life: ethical, clinical and legal perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. (Bioethics and Law).
Tieman J, Sladek R, Currow D. Changes in the quantity and level of evidence of palliative and hospice care literature: the last century. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35): 5679–83.
Visser C, Hadley G, Wee B. Reality of evidence-based practice in palliative care. Cancer Biol Med. 2015;12(3):193–200.
Vollman J, Winau R. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. Br Med J. 1996;313:1445–7.
Wee B, Hadley G, Derry S. How useful are systematic reviews for informing palliative care practice? Survey of 25 Cochrane systematic reviews. BMC Palliat Care. 2008;7:13.
Wendler D. A pragmatic analysis of vulnerability. Bioethics. 2017;31(7):515–25.
Wertheimer A. Exploitation in Clinical Research. In: Emanuel EJ, editor. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 201–10.
Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research – “Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;297(4):403–6.
White C, Hardy J. What do palliative care patients and their relatives think about research in palliative care? – A systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:905–11.
White C, Gilshenan K, Hardy J. A survey of the views of palliative care healthcare professionals towards referring cancer patients to participate in randomized controlled trials in palliative care. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:1397–405.
Williams EP, Walter JK. When Does the Amount We Pay Research Participants Become “Undue Influence”? J Am Med Assoc. 2015;17(12):1116–21.
Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299(2):211–3.
World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(20):2191–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Raus, K., Sterckx, S. (2018). Ethics in Palliative Care Research. In: MacLeod, R., Van den Block, L. (eds) Textbook of Palliative Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31738-0_110-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31738-0_110-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31738-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31738-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences