Abstract
This paper addresses the question “what makes a system whole and sustainable.” It applies a theory of whole systems (R-theory) derived from Robert Rosen’s original work in Relational Biology. A rigorous treatment of systemic holism can be articulated by expressing the logic of Rosen’s “modeling relation” between “natural” and “formal” systems in terms of cyclical causality (closed loops of causation) comprising four fundamental causes in nature, two describing observable and two describing contextual domains. Rosen presented what he believed to be the minimum causal requirement for a system to be alive, in the efficient cause closure of a “Metabolism-Repair (M-R) System.” This was presented as proof that life is not a mechanism but rather an anticipatory system containing “impredicative” (causally isolated) models. However, he did not go on to articulate the more general worldview that these observations would imply. R-theory attempts to do so, generalizing M-R closure and modeling relations to propose a mathematical object, the holon, in category theory. The holon is an objectified modeling relation formalized as an analytical unit for describing whole natural systems and their fractions. As such they reify hidden contextual relations that are necessary to explain organization and origin of mechanistic causes and emergence of anticipatory and evolutionary identity (including concepts of “self”). The result is a quintessential (“of fifth essence”) unification of the traditional four causes as a cycle similar to ancient Vedic Cycles of causation that were lost in Western dualism. Such cycles necessitate and define an irreducible role for information as a transcendent process embedded in nature. Four basic types of life organization and strategy are predicted by the theory and found to correspond in significant detail with the organizational and strategic characteristics of the four main empirically determined taxonomic domains of life. They are Eukaryota, Archaea, and Bacteria as causally closed organism types, plus Protobiota, a pre-organismic type that includes subtypes sharing various M-R functions with a host or the environment. These four life types are proposed as archetypes that provide a scientific definition of sustainability in terms of causal closure. Such whole, sustainable cycles apply to organisms, living components of organisms, quasi-life forms, ecosystems, and socio-ecological systems as locally bounded systems. They also apply generally as an implicit unbounded latency in nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, C. R., Angeler, D. G., Garmestani, A. S., Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2014). Panarchy: Theory and application. Ecosystems, 17, 578–589.
Axelrod, R. (2009). The evolution of cooperation: Revised edition. New York: Basic Books.
Bailey, D. T. J. (2014). Platonic causes revisited. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 52, 15–32.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: a necessary unity. Bantam, Toronto.
Bell, S. (2012). DPSIR = A Problem Structuring Method? An exploration from the Imagine approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 222, 350–360.
Benovsky, J. (2015). Dual-aspect monism. Philosophical Investigations, 39, 335–352.
Bohm, D. (2002). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge.
Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15, 181–195.
Chisholm, R. M. (1964). Human freedom and the self. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
Cohen, S. M. (2016). Aristotle’s metaphysics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Coope, U. (2007). Aristotle on action. Supplement to the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 81, 109–138.
Corning, P. A. (2001). Control information: The missing element in Norbert Wiener’s cybernetic paradigm? Kybernetes, 30, 1272–1288.
Cornish-Bowden, A. (2006). Putting the systems back into systems biology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 49, 475–489.
Cottam, R., Ranson, W., & Vounckx, R. (2006). Living in hyperscale: Internalization as a search for reunification. In Proceedings of the 50th annual meeting of the ISSS – 2006, Sonoma.
Craver, C., & Tabery, J. (2017). Mechanisms in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Crowell, S. (1995). Landscapes of Change Toward a New Paradigm for Education. Integrative Learning As the Pathway to Teaching Holism, Complexity and Interconnectedness, p. Edwin Mellen Press.
Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene (Revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Day, R. L., Laland, K. N., & Odling-Smee, F. J. (2003). Rethinking adaptation: The niche-construction perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46, 80–95.
Dittrich, T. (2015). ‘The concept of information in physics’: An interdisciplinary topical lecture. European Journal of Physics, 36, 015010.
Doyle, J. C., Francis, B. A., & Tannenbaum, A. R. (2013). Feedback control theory. New York: Courier Corporation.
Easwaran, E. (1987). The Upanishads: Translated with a general introduction by Eknath Easwaran. Petaluma: Nilgiri Press.
Edson, M. C., Henning, P. B. & Sankaran, S. (eds.) (2016). A guide to systems research: Philosophy, processes and practice (1st ed., 2017th ed.). New York: Springer.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777–780.
Encyclopædia Britannica. (1911). Descartes, René. 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (Vol. 8).
Falcon, A. (2015). Aristotle on causality. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Galli, P., Stefani, F., Benzoni, F., & Zullini, A. (2005). Introduction of alien host–parasite complexes in a natural environment and the symbiota concept. Hydrobiologia, 548, 293–299.
Gare, A. (2008). Approaches to the question, what is life?: reconciling theoretical biology with philosophical biology. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 4, 53–77.
Gare, A. (2011). From kant to schelling and process metaphysics: on the way to ecological civilization. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 7, 26–69.
Gorban, A. N., & Yablonsky, G. S. (2013). Grasping complexity. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 65, 1421–1426.
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11, 39–78.
Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2012). The grand design (Reprint). New York: Bantam.
Hedges, J. (1992). Global biogeochemical cycles: Progress and problems. Marine Chemistry, 39, 67.
Henry, R. C. (2005). The mental universe. Nature, 436, 29–29.
Hofmeyr, J.-H. S. (2007). The biochemical factory that autonomously fabricates itself: A systems biological view of the living cell. In Boogerd, F. C., Bruggeman, F. J., Hofmeyr, J.-H. S., & Westerhoff, H. V. (Eds.), Systems Biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 217–242.
Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York: Wiley.
Houpis, C. H., Rasmussen, S. J., & Garcia-Sanz, M. (2005). Quantitative feedback theory: Fundamentals and applications (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Hsen-Hsu, H. (1965). The major groups of living beings: A new classification. Taxon, 14, 254–261.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1948). Circular causal systems in ecology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 50, 221–246.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1953). The niche: An abstractly inhabited hyper-volume. Proceedings of the Academy of Natual Sciences, 105, 1–12.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82, 68–81.
Kafatos, M. C., & Nadeau, R. (2000). The conscious universe: Parts and wholes in physical reality (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Katz, J. (2007). One: Essential writings on nonduality. Boulder: Sentient Publications.
Kay, J.J. (1994) The ecosystem approach: Ecosystems as complex systems and state of the environment reporting.
Kay, J. J. (1997). The ecosystem approach: Ecosystems as complex systems. Cali: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical.
Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. M. (1984). Please understand me: Character & temperament types. Del Mar: Prometheus Nemesis.
Khanna, M., & Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts (Eds.). (2004). R̥ta, the cosmic order. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld in association with Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts.
Kineman, J. J. (2007a). Ecological niche models as structure-function relationships. Relational complexity in natural science and the design of ecological informatics (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder).
Kineman, J. J. (2007b). Modeling relations in nature and eco-informatics: A practical application of Rosennean complexity. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 4, 2436–2457.
Kineman, J. J. (2009a). Relational self-similar space-time cosmology revisited. In J. Allen & J. Wilby (Eds.), Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences. Brisbane: ISSS.
Kineman, J. J. (2009b). Relational theory and ecological niche modeling. In J. Allen & J. Wilby (Eds.), Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences. Brisbane: ISSS.
Kineman, J. J. (2011). Relational science: A synthesis. Axiomathes, 21, 393–437.
Kineman, J. J. (2012a). R-theory: A synthesis of Robert Rosen’s relational complexity. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29, 527–538.
Kineman, J. J. (2012b). Testing predictions of relational space-time cosmology. In J. Allen & J. Wilby (Eds.), Proceedings of the 56th annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences. San Jose: ISSS.
Kineman, J. (2016). An holistic framework. A guide to systems research: philosophy, processes and practice translational systems sciences (1st edition). In M. C. Edson, P. B. Henning, & S. Sankaran (Eds.), Chapter 4. Springer, New York, NY.
Kineman, J. J. (2017). A causal framework for integrating contemporary and Vedic holism. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 131, 402–423.
Kineman, J. J., & Poli, R. (2014). Ecological literacy leadership: Into the mind of nature. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 95, 30–58.
Koestler, A. (1969). Beyond atomism and holism: The concept of the holon. In Beyond reductionism (pp. 192–232).
Krupanidhi, S., Madhan, N., Leung, H., & Kineman, J. J. (2017). The leaf as a sustainable and renewable system. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34, 564.
Laszlo, E. (2007). Science and the Akashic field: An integral theory of everything. Rochester: Inner Traditions/Bear & Co.
Louie, A. (2009). More than life itself: A synthetic continuation in relational biology. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
Louie, A. H. (2013). The reflection of life: Functional entailment and imminence in relational biology. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Lowe, E. J. (2006). The four-category ontology: A metaphysical foundation for natural science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Loy, D. (1997). Nonduality: A study in comparative philosophy (Reprint Humanity Books ed.). Atlantic Highlands.
Masreliez, C. J. (2006). Does cosmological scale expansion explain the universe? Physics Essays, 19, 91–122.
Masreliez, C. J. (2012). The progression of time: How the expansion of space and time forms our world and powers the universe. Amazon Createspace Independent Pub, Seattle, WA.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mayumi, K., & Giampietro, M. (2006). The epistemological challenge of self-modifying systems: Governance and sustainability in the post-normal science era. Ecological Economics, 57, 382–399.
McEvilley, T. (2012). The shape of ancient thought: Comparative studies in Greek and Indian philosophies. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.
McIntosh, J. (2002). A peaceful realm : The rise and fall of the Indus civilization. Westview Press. Boulder.
McIntosh, J. (2008). The ancient Indus Valley: New perspectives. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Mehta, R. (2007). The call of the Upanishads (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Melillo, J. M., Borchers, J., Chaney, J., Fisher, H., Fox, S., Haxeltine, A., Janetos, A., Kicklighter, D. W., Kittel, T. G. F., Mcguire, A. D., Mckeown, R., Neilson, R., Nemani, R., Ojima, D. S., Painter, T., Pan, Y., Parton, W. J., Pierce, L., Pitelka, L., Prentice, C., Rizzo, B., Rosenbloom, N. A., Running, S., Schimel, D. S., Sitch, S., Smith, T., & Woodward, I. (1995). Vegetation ecosystem modeling and analysis project – comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate-change and Co2 doubling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9, 407–437.
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., & Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation (1st ed.). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Montandon, H., & Baars, B. (2011). Shut up and calculate! International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 3, 367–374.
Murdoch, D.R. (1989). Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Naruse, M., & Iba, T. (2008). Ecosystem as an autopoietic system: Considering relationship between ecology and society based on Luhmann’s theory. In Fourth Joint Japan-North America mathematical sociology conference, Fourth Joint Japan-North America Mathematical Sociology Conference.
Odling-Smee, F. J. (1988). Nich-constructing phenotypes. In H. C. Plotkin (Ed.), The role of behavior in evolution (pp. 73–132). Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pattee, H. H. (2001). The physics of symbols: Bridging the epistemic cut. Biosystems, 60, 5–21.
Poli, R. (2011). Ontological categories, latents, and the irrational. Ontological Categories, De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110329599.153.
Rohrlich, F. (1989). From Paradox to Reality: Our Basic Concepts of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.
Rosen, R. (1958a). A relational theory of biological systems. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 20, 245–260.
Rosen, R. (1958b). The representation of biological systems from the standpoint of the theory of categories. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 20, 317–341.
Rosen, R. (1978). Fundamentals of measurement and representation of natural systems (North-Holland series in general research systems, p. 221). New York/Oxford: North-Holland.
Rosen, R. (1985a). Anticipatory systems: philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations. Pergamon Press, New York, NY.
Rosen, R. (1985b). Theoretical biology and complexity: three essays on the natural philosophy of complex systems. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL.
Rosen, R. (1988). Complexity and information. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 22, 211–218.
Rosen, R. (1990). The modeling relation and natural law. In Mathematics and science (pp. 183–199). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosen, R. (1993a). Bionics revisited. In The machine as metaphor and tool (pp. 87–100). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Rosen, R. (1993b). Drawing the boundary between subject and object: Comments on the mind-brain problem. Theoretical Medicine, 14, 89–100.
Rosen, R. (1994). On psychomimesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 171, 87–92.
Rosen, R. (1996). Biology and the measurement problem. Computers & Chemistry, 20, 95–100.
Rosen, R. (1999). Essays on life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosen, R. (2012). Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations (2nd ed. (1st ed. 1985)). New York: Springer.
Rosen, J., & Kineman, J. J. (2004). Anticipatory systems and time: A new look at rosennean complexity. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the international society for the system sciences (ISSS). Pacific Grove: ISSS.
Schrödinger, E. (1943). What is life? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schrodinger, E. (1967). What is life? Mind and matter (combined reprint 1967 edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schrodinger, E. (2012). What is life? With mind and matter and autobiographical sketches (Reprint ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization (Revised & updated). New York: Doubleday.
Simeonov, P. L. (2010). Integral biomathics: A post-Newtonian view into the logos of bios. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 102, 85–121.
Stromberg, G. (1942). Coherence in the physical world. Philosophy of Science, 9, 323–334.
Torday, J. S., & Miller, W. B. (2017). The resolution of ambiguity as the basis for life: A cellular bridge between western reductionism and eastern holism. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 131, 288–297.
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2013). A world of contingencies. Zygon, 48, 77–92.
Von Bertalanfy, L. (1968). General system theory (Revised ed.). New York: George Braziller.
Waltner-Toews, D., Kay, J. J., & Lister, N. M. E. (2008). The ecosystem approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wheeler, J. A. (1981). Law without law. In Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 182–213). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wright, R. (2014). Introducing Greek philosophy. Routledge, New York.
Zwirn, H. (2016). The measurement problem: Decoherence and convivial solipsism. Foundations of Physics, 46, 635–667.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kineman, J.J. (2018). Four Kinds of Anticipatory (M-R) Life and a Definition of Sustainability. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_53-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_53-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities