Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variations of Marker Sets and Models for Standard Gait Analysis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Human Motion

Abstract

A variety of different approaches is used in 3D clinical gait analysis. This chapter provides an overview of common terms, different marker sets, underlying anatomical models, as well as a fundamental understanding of measurement techniques commonly used in clinical gait analysis and the consideration of possible errors associated with these different techniques. Besides the different marker sets, two main approaches can be used to quantify marker-based joint angles: a prediction approach based on regression equations and a functional approach. The prediction approach uses anatomical assumptions and anthropometric reference data to define the locations of joint centers/axes relative to specific anatomical landmarks. In the functional approach, joint centers are determined via optimization of marker movement. The accuracy of determining skeletal kinematics is limited by ambiguity in landmark identification and soft-tissue artifacts. When the intersubject variability of control data becomes greater than the expected change due to pathology, the clinical usefulness of the data becomes doubtful. To allow a practical interpretation of a comparison of approaches, differences and the measurement error should be quantified in the unit of interest (i.e., degree or percent). The highest reliability indices occurred in the hip and knee in the sagittal plane, with lowest reliability and highest errors for hip and knee rotation in the transverse plane. In addition, knowledge about sources of errors should be known before the approach is applied in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP (2001) Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems. J Biomech 34(3):355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplast 20(8):1060–1067. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assi A, Sauret C, Massaad A, Bakouny Z, Pillet H, Skalli W, Ghanem I (2016) Validation of hip joint center localization methods during gait analysis using 3D EOS imaging in typically developing and cerebral palsy children. Gait Posture 48:30–35. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell AL, Pedersen DR, Brand RA (1990) A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech 23(6):617–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti MG, Catani F, Leardini A, Pignotti E, Giannini S (1998) Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 13(3):204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borhani M, McGregor AH, Bull AM (2013) An alternative technical marker set for the pelvis is more repeatable than the standard pelvic marker set. Gait Posture 38(4):1032–1037. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno P, Barden J (2015) Comparison of two alternative technical marker sets for measuring 3D pelvic motion during gait. J Biomech 48(14):3876–3882. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappello A, Cappozzo A, La Palombara PF, Lucchetti L, Leardini A (1997) Multiple anatomical landmark calibration for optimal bone pose estimation. Hum Mov Sci 16(2–3):259–274. doi:10.1016/S0167-9457(96)00055-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappello A, Stagni R, Fantozzi S, Leardini A (2005) Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by double anatomical landmark calibration: performance of a novel method during selected motor tasks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(6):992–998. doi:10.1109/tbme.2005.846728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappozzo A (1984) Gait analysis methodology. Hum Mov Sci 3(1–2):27–50. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(84)90004-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappozzo A (1991) Three-dimensional analysis of human walking: experimental methods and associated artifacts. Hum Mov Sci 10(5):589–602. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90047-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce UD, Leardini A (1995) Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 10(4):171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Croce UD (1996) Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11(2):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappozzo A, Cappello A, Della Croce U, Pensalfini F (1997) Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44(12):1165–1174. doi:10.1109/10.649988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiari L, Della Croce U, Leardini A, Cappozzo A (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. Gait Posture 21(2):197–211. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins TD, Ghoussayni SN, Ewins DJ, Kent JA (2009) A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set. Gait Posture 30(2):173–180. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis RB, DeLuca PA (1996) Clinical gait analysis: current methods and future directions. In: Harris GF, Smith PA (eds) Human motion analysis: current applications and future directions. The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Press, New York, pp 17–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RB III, Õunpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR (1991) A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10(5):575–587. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffell LD, Hope N, McGregor AH (2014) Comparison of kinematic and kinetic parameters calculated using a cluster-based model and Vicon’s plug-in gait. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 228(2):206–210. doi:10.1177/0954411913518747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrig RM, Taylor WR, Duda GN, Heller MO (2006) A survey of formal methods for determining the centre of rotation of ball joints. J Biomech 39(15):2798–2809. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrig RM, Heller MO, Kratzenstein S, Duda GN, Trepczynski A, Taylor WR (2011) The SCoRE residual: a quality index to assess the accuracy of joint estimations. J Biomech 44(7):1400–1404. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber R, McClay Davis I, Williams DS 3rd, Laughton C (2002) A comparison of within- and between-day reliability of discrete 3D lower extremity variables in runners. J Orthop Res 20(6):1139–1145. doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari A, Benedetti MG, Pavan E, Frigo C, Bettinelli D, Rabuffetti M, Crenna P, Leardini A (2008) Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis. Gait Posture 28(2):207–216. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukaya T, Mutsuzaki H, Wadano Y (2013) Interrater reproducibility of knee movement analyses during the stance phase: use of anatomical landmark calibration with a rigid marker set. Rehabil Res Pract 2013:692624. doi:10.1155/2013/692624

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller J, Liu LJ, Murphy MC, Mann RW (1997) A comparison of lower-extremity skeletal kinematics measured using skin- and pin-mounted markers. Hum Mov Sci 16(2–3):219–242. doi:10.1016/S0167-9457(96)00053-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao B, Zheng NN (2008) Investigation of soft tissue movement during level walking: translations and rotations of skin markers. J Biomech 41(15):3189–3195. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garling EH, Kaptein BL, Mertens B, Barendregt W, Veeger HE, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER (2007) Soft-tissue artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and skin-mounted markers. J Biomech 40(Suppl 1):S18–S24. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton GE 3rd, Hebert DA, Gannotti ME (2009) Assessment of the kinematic variability among 12 motion analysis laboratories. Gait Posture 29(3):398–402. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.10.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington ME, Zavatsky AB, Lawson SE, Yuan Z, Theologis TN (2007) Prediction of the hip joint centre in adults, children, and patients with cerebral palsy based on magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech 40(3):595–602. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller MO, Kratzenstein S, Ehrig RM, Wassilew G, Duda GN, Taylor WR (2011) The weighted optimal common shape technique improves identification of the hip joint center of rotation in vivo. J Orthop Res 29(10):1470–1475. doi:10.1002/jor.21426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden JP, Stanhope SJ (1998) The effect of variation in knee center location estimates on net knee joint moments. Gait Posture 7(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden JP, Orsini JA, Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Gerber LH, Stanhope SJ (1997) Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait. Gait & Posture 5(3):217–227. doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01088-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isman RE, Inman VT (1969) Anthropometric studies of the human foot and ankle. Bull Prosthet Res 10(11):97–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME, Gainey J, Gorton G, Cochran GV (1989) Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Res 7(6):849–860. doi:10.1002/jor.1100070611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson D, Tranberg R (1999) On skin movement artefact-resonant frequencies of skin markers attached to the leg. Hum Mov Sci 18(5):627–635. doi:10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00025-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisho Fukuchi R, Arakaki C, Veras Orselli MI, Duarte M (2010) Evaluation of alternative technical markers for the pelvic coordinate system. J Biomech 43(3):592–594. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornaropoulos EI, Taylor WR, Duda GN, Ehrig RM, Matziolis G, Muller M, Wassilew G, Asbach P, Perka C, Heller MO (2010) Frontal plane alignment: an imageless method to predict the mechanical femoral-tibial angle (mFTA) based on functional determination of joint centres and axes. Gait Posture 31(2):204–208. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzenstein S, Kornaropoulos EI, Ehrig RM, Heller MO, Popplau BM, Taylor WR (2012) Effective marker placement for functional identification of the centre of rotation at the hip. Gait Posture 36(3):482–486. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss I, List R, Janssen P, Grau S, Horstmann T, Stacoff A (2012) Comparison of distinctive gait variables using two different biomechanical models for knee joint kinematics in subjects with knee osteoarthritis and healthy controls. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27(3):281–286. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leardini A, Cappozzo A, Catani F, Toksvig-Larsen S, Petitto A, Sforza V, Cassanelli G, Giannini S (1999) Validation of a functional method for the estimation of hip joint centre location. J Biomech 32(1):99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leardini A, Chiari L, Della Croce U, Cappozzo A (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture 21(2):212–225. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leardini A, Sawacha Z, Paolini G, Ingrosso S, Nativo R, Benedetti MG (2007) A new anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children. Gait Posture 26(4):560–571. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchetti L, Cappozzo A, Cappello A, Della Croce U (1998) Skin movement artefact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee-joint kinematics. J Biomech 31(11):977–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luiz RR, Szklo M (2005) More than one statistical strategy to assess agreement of quantitative measurements may usefully be reported. J Clin Epidemiol 58(3):215–216. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Nemeth G, Selvik G (1989) The axis of rotation of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 71(1):94–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Manal K, McClay I, Stanhope S, Richards J, Galinat B (2000) Comparison of surface mounted markers and attachment methods in estimating tibial rotations during walking: an in vivo study. Gait Posture 11(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manal K, McClay I, Richards J, Galinat B, Stanhope S (2002) Knee moment profiles during walking: errors due to soft tissue movement of the shank and the influence of the reference coordinate system. Gait Posture 15(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manal K, McClay Davis I, Galinat B, Stanhope S (2003) The accuracy of estimating proximal tibial translation during natural cadence walking: bone vs. skin mounted targets. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18(2):126–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinley JL, Baker R, Wolfe R, Morris ME (2009) The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review. Gait Posture 29(3):360–369. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMulkin ML, Gordon AB (2009) The effect of static standing posture on dynamic walking kinematics: comparison of a thigh wand versus a patella marker. Gait Posture 30(3):375–378. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miana AN, Prudencio MV, Barros RM (2009) Comparison of protocols for walking and running kinematics based on skin surface markers and rigid clusters of markers. Int J Sports Med 30(11):827–833. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1234054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Most E, Axe J, Rubash H, Li G (2004) Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. J Biomech 37(11):1743–1748. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan KJ, Halliday S, Browne R, O’Brien S, Kayes K, Feinberg J (2003) Interobserver variability of gait analysis in patients with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 23(3):279–287 discussion 288-291

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry J, Burnfield JM (2010) Gait Analysis. Normal and pathological function, 2nd edn. SLACK Incorporated, Thorofare

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza SJ, Cavanagh PR (2000) Measurement of the screw-home motion of the knee is sensitive to errors in axis alignment. J Biomech 33(8):1029–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Lundberg A, Nigg BM, Murphy N, Stacoff A, Stano A (1997a) Tibiofemoral and tibiocalcaneal motion during walking: external vs. skeletal markers. Gait Posture 6(2):98–109. doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(97)01110-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM, Lundberg A, Murphy N (1997b) Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech 30(7):729–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards J (2008) Biomechanics in clinic and research. Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandau M, Heimburger RV, Villa C, Jensen KE, Moeslund TB, Aanaes H, Alkjaer T, Simonsen EB (2015) New equations to calculate 3D joint centres in the lower extremities. Med Eng Phys 37(10):948–955. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangeux M, Peters A, Baker R (2011) Hip joint centre localization: evaluation on normal subjects in the context of gait analysis. Gait Posture 34(3):324–328. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schache AG, Baker R, Lamoreux LW (2008) Influence of thigh cluster configuration on the estimation of hip axial rotation. Gait Posture 27(1):60–69. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz BW, Kimmel WL (2010) Can hip and knee kinematics be improved by eliminating thigh markers? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25(7):687–692. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MH, Rozumalski A (2005) A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data. J Biomech 38(1):107–116. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MH, Trost JP, Wervey RA (2004) Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data. Gait Posture 20(2):196–203. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfling DM, Hooke AW, Bernhardt KA, Kaufman KR, 2009 Comparison of techniques for finding the knee joint center. In: Proceedings of the gait and clinical movement analysis society. p 43

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagni R, Fantozzi S, Cappello A, Leardini A (2005) Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20(3):320–329. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stief F, Bohm H, Michel K, Schwirtz A, Doderlein L (2013) Reliability and accuracy in three-dimensional gait analysis: a comparison of two lower body protocols. J Appl Biomech 29(1):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szczerbik E, Kalinowska M (2011) The influence of knee marker placement error on evaluation of gait kinematic parameters. Acta Bioeng Biomech 13(3):43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor WR, Ehrig RM, Duda GN, Schell H, Seebeck P, Heller MO (2005) On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers. J Orthop Res 23(4):726–734. doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2005.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor WR, Kornaropoulos EI, Duda GN, Kratzenstein S, Ehrig RM, Arampatzis A, Heller MO (2010) Repeatability and reproducibility of OSSCA, a functional approach for assessing the kinematics of the lower limb. Gait Posture 32(2):231–236. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan CL, Davis BL, O’Conner JC (1992) Dynamics of human gait. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidow J, Tranberg R, Saari T, Karrholm J (2006) Hip and knee joint rotations differ between patients with medial and lateral knee osteoarthritis: gait analysis of 30 patients and 15 controls. J Orthop Res 24(9):1890–1899. doi:10.1002/jor.20194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wren TA, Do KP, Hara R, Rethlefsen SA (2008) Use of a patella marker to improve tracking of dynamic hip rotation range of motion. Gait Posture 27(3):530–534. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I (2002) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech 35(4):543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Movement Analysis Lab, Orthopedic University Hospital Friedrichsheim gGmbH, Marienburgstraße 2, 60528, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

    Felix Stief

Authors
  1. Felix Stief
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Stief .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Motion & More, Barcelona, Spain

    Bertram Müller

  2. Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgi, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Sebastian I. Wolf

  3. Institut for Biomechanics und Orthopedic, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Gert-Peter Brueggemann

  4. Houston, Texas, USA

    Zhigang Deng

  5. ACRISP, FedUniversity, Cremorne, New South Wales, Australia

    Andrew McIntosh

  6. Wilmington, Delaware, USA

    Freeman Miller

  7. Research, C-Motion, Inc., Germantown, Maryland, USA

    William Scott Selbie

Section Editor information

  1. Movement Analysis Laboratory, Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery; Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury;Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany

    Sebastian I. Wolf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stief, F. (2016). Variations of Marker Sets and Models for Standard Gait Analysis. In: Müller, B., et al. Handbook of Human Motion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30808-1_26-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30808-1_26-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30808-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation