Abstract
Invasive infections due to yeast are among the most common infections following solid organ transplantation and account for considerable morbidity and mortality. Infections due to Candida species are most common, accounting for over half of all fungal infections following solid organ transplantation. Cryptococcosis is the next most common yeast infection in organ transplant recipients, and is overall the third most common invasive mycosis in this population. Much of what we know about the management of these infections is extrapolated from observations in the general population or other at-risk populations supplemented by lessons learned specific to solid organ transplantation. As the solid organ transplant population continues to grow larger and live longer, the capacity to prevent, diagnosis, and treat these infections appropriately will become more relevant and challenging.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Solid organ transplantation
- Invasive fungal infections
- Yeast
- Candida
- Cryptococcus
- Trichosporon
- Rhodotorula
- Meningitis
- Fungemia
1 Candida
1.1 Epidemiology
Candida is a genus of yeast found in abundance worldwide. There is a wide variety of species found throughout the environment, however only about 15 of these are commonly pathogenic in humans. In addition to causing disease, the yeast can be found throughout the body as a part of the normal human microbial environment.
The Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) study reported in 2010 that Candida comprised more than half of all documented invasive fungal infections in SOT recipients [1]. Candida albicans was the predominant species, however was the etiologic pathogen in approximately 50% of Candida cases. C. glabrata comprised a quarter while the remaining cases were primarily caused by C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei. Polymicrobial infection occurred in almost 10%. The Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) registry followed a broader group of patients and saw a similar distribution of species overall, however when looking at solely solid organ transplant recipients, observed C. glabrata to be the most common species at nearly 40% [2]. They also demonstrated similar findings of Candida being the most common cause of fungal infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients [3]. A follow-up study from the PATH registry looking solely at non-albicans species observed C. glabrata to cause over 60% of non-albicans candidiaisis (Table 38-1) [4]. A similar population-based monitoring program, the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, demonstrated C. albicans as the most common with C. glabrata second, however at a lower frequency (less than 20%) compared to TRANSNET and PATH Alliance [5]. One key difference between the studies, however, is that while TRANSNET and PATH were confined to North America, SENTRY was a worldwide study. The SENTRY breakdown by region shows their North America rates by species to be similar to the other studies, with much lower rates of C. glabrata in the other parts of the world [6]. C. parapsilosis supplants C. glabrata as the second most common species in their Latin America isolates.
1.2 Pathogenesis
As the most common species, the majority of work looking at pathogenesis and virulence has focused on C. albicans. C. albicans has an ability to exist along a spectrum from budding yeast to a walled hyphal structure [7]. One primary mode of virulence is the ability of the yeast to adhere to surfaces, including human cells, and convert to the hyphal form for the purposes of invading tissue [7]. Indeed, altering genetics to prevent the transition from yeast to hyphal phase has been shown to decrease pathogenicity [8]. The ability to adhere to surfaces is also an important contributor to human disease with the ability to form biofilms on prosthetic surfaces, including a concurrent upregulation of resistance mechanisms [9]. The adherence of fungal cells to a surface and formation of a biofilm prompt the development of “persister cells” that are highly resistant to antifungals [10].
1.3 Clinical Manifestations
1.3.1 Superficial Infections
As SOT recipients have their immune system influenced by pharmacologic immunosuppression, in particular glucocorticosteroids, Candida is presented with the opportunity to transform from commensal to pathogen. The spectrum of superficial disease ranges from cutaneous to mucous membrane and can occur in a variety of sites. Additional co-morbid conditions can contribute to the development of oropharyngeal thrush or vaginitis, such as concurrent antibiotic use (e.g., prophylaxis) and diabetes. Oropharyngeal thrush can progress to a more invasive form of mucosal disease, specifically, Candida esophagitis. A more severe infection such as this must be dealt with promptly as potential complications ranging from stricture to perforation and death have been reported [11, 12].
1.3.2 Candidemia
Candidemia is the most common manifestation of invasive candidiasis amongst transplant recipients based on data from the TRANSNET cohort [1, 13]. The following risk factors are well understood to place patients at risk for invasive candidiasis: neutropenia, chemotherapy, colonization with Candida, broad-spectrum antibiotics, central venous catheter, hemodialysis or renal failure, critical illness, parenteral nutrition, mechanical ventilation, surgery, and advanced age [14]. It is not uncommon for the SOT recipient to meet one or more of these factors.
Liver transplant recipients are at particularly increased risk of candidemia with a variety of potential factors taking into account pre- and post-transplant variables. Using a focused algorithm of creatinine greater than 3 mg/dL, transplant operative time greater than or equal to 11 h, retransplantation, receipt of more than 40 units of blood products, or early fungal colonization, the presence of two or more factors identified a group of patients in whom 67% developed an invasive fungal infection with Candida being the most common genus [15]. Since the establishment of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) , this has now been evaluated for its contribution to predicting infectious complications [16, 17]. In multivariate analysis including other known risk factors for invasive fungal infections (IFIs), an elevated MELD score has been shown to have increased odds for developing all types of IFIs including invasive candidiasis and candidemia [17].
1.3.3 Urinary Tract Infection
Candida is an uncommon pathogen in the urinary tract; however, it is a frequent colonizer in certain patients. Patients with urinary catheters, diabetes, on broad-spectrum antibiotics, or prolonged hospitalization are all prone to Candida isolation from urine culture specimens. Renal transplant recipients, in particular, pose a dilemma over what to do with positive culture results in the setting of manipulation of the urinary tract and possibly the placement of a ureteral stent. Prosthetic materials are one of the situations where Candida can evolve from colonizer to pathogen. Studies to determine the true incidence of candiduria in renal transplant recipients are inconclusive, however it probably approximates 10%, not dissimilar to the hospitalized population as a whole [18, 19]. These studies have failed to show a substantial benefit to treating a positive Candida urine culture in the absence of symptomatic probable or proven disease. Infection can be severe with pyelonephritis having been reported [20, 21].
1.3.4 Intra-Abdominal
Candida has long been known to be a colonizer of the gastrointestinal tract, and therefore controversy has persisted over whether its presence in peritoneal culture represents colonization versus invasive infection [22]. In particular, complicated nosocomial peritonitis appears to be an instance of true infection [23]. Liver, small bowel, and pancreas transplant recipients can be of increased risk and, if certain criteria are met, may warrant fluconazole prophylaxis to prevent invasive candidiasis. This will be discussed in more detail below.
1.3.5 Pulmonary
Candida as a cause of primary pneumonia is exceptionally rare. While pulmonary disease does occur, it is generally in the form of hematogenous spread from other sources. This generally appears radiographically as septic emboli. Candida frequently occurs as a colonizer either of the respiratory tract or, in the mechanically ventilated, the endotracheal tube given the organism’s propensity to adhere to surfaces. Studies have failed to find an association between microbiologic growth of Candida from bronchoscopic specimens and an impact mortality or other outcomes [24, 25]. An exception to this statement is limited to anastomotic tracheobronchitis in lung transplant recipients. This is a well-described entity and can be caused by a wide variety of organisms, including Candida [26]. A single center study looking at the causes of tracheobronchitis in 272 heart–lung or lung recipients found 15 anastomotic infections, of which Candida was the most common pathogen, having been diagnosed in eight of the patients [27].
1.3.6 Ocular
Involvement of the eye is an uncommon but well-recognized complication of disseminated invasive candidiasis. Clinical manifestations range from chorioretinitis to full-blown endophthalmitis. Rates as high as 26% for ocular spread associated with candidemia have been reported. Historically C. albicans is more likely than other species to cause ocular involvement based on its innate invasive potential, while C. parapsilosis is the least likely compared to other species [28, 29]. There are no prospective studies looking at rates of ocular candidiasis in solid organ transplant recipients; however, it has been reported in the SOT population [26, 30, 31]. It does appear to be an uncommon complication, as one series reporting all ocular infections from a cohort of heart transplant recipients had no cases caused by Candida [32].
1.3.7 Donor-Derived
Presence of Candida in the gastrointestinal tract raises the potential for transmission in the process of the intra-peritoneal organs [33]. Additionally, the presence of candidemia prior to or at the time of death of the donor would raise the potential for transmission. While not strictly a donor-derived complication, there are numerous case reports of Candida contaminating the preservation fluid in transport from donor to recipient [34–39]. A study of graft-site candidiasis deriving from organ recovery in renal transplant recipients found renal arteritis to be the most common complication [40].
1.4 Diagnosis
Culture is currently the gold standard of diagnosis. While it is difficult to interpret a culture positive for Candida species from a non-sterile site, sterile cultures are indicative of an invasive process and should be treated with the utmost urgency. Given the benefits of early and effective treatment and the variation of anti-fungal sensitivities based on species, efforts are underway to develop more reliable means of rapid diagnosis and species identification.
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) is one means of rapid identification that can lead to faster adjustment of antifungal treatment. MALDI-TOF has been shown to identify Candida species with accuracy equal to or greater than conventional methods [41]. Additionally, the technology has been shown to drastically decrease time to identification, in particular for the non-albicans Candida species [42]. To run the assay, a pure culture specimen must undergo preparation specific to the brand of MALDI-TOF in use. While this earlier identification can be beneficial in making empiric adjustments in treatment, it does not impact the time to diagnosis of invasive candidiasis since it still requires a positive culture.
Peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) can be performed directly from a positive blood culture bottle prior to being plated for isolation of pure colonies with a very high level of sensitivity and specificity for C. albicans [43]. Commercially available multi-species kits now exist but have some limitations in their ability to distinguish completely to the species level with pairing of species to a single color fluorescence [44]. The test can be run directly from positive blood culture bottles or from sub-cultured colonies. While this has the potential to provide some identification data even faster than MALDI-TOF, it is still reliant on Candida growing in culture.
The most recent technology to become available is the T2Candida® assay. Based on magnetic resonance technology, the assay is able to identify to a paired species level (C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. krusei/C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis) from a whole blood specimen without waiting for a positive culture [45]. The technology can identify a positive signal within hours of the obtaining the whole blood specimen, thus having the potential to identify candidemia much sooner and lead to earlier initiation of appropriate therapy. Additionally it has an excellent negative predictive value for candidemia which could be used to de-escalate or stop unnecessary anti-fungal therapy very quickly (Table 38-2).
Non-fungemic invasive candidiasis remains a challenge to diagnose [46]. An assay to detect (1 → 3)-β-d-glucan (BDG), a component of the Candida cell wall, in serum or plasma has been shown in a meta-analysis to have a sensitivity of 76.8% and specificity of 85.3% for proven or probable invasive fungal infections from any organism [47]. Studies restricted to candidiasis have sensitivities ranging from 57% to 97% while the specificity was 44% to 93% [48]. Part of the variation in specificity is due to the presence of the protein in the cell wall of most fungi, not solely Candida. Thus, the assay is less specific than some other assays and is considered to be “pan-fungal” by many experts. One study restricted to liver transplant recipients showed improved performance with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 89% [49]. Conversely, the test performs poorly in lung transplant recipients with one study having a sensitivity of 71 and 59%, noting mold colonization of the lungs and hemodialysis raised levels of BDG [50]. A meta-analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of candidiasis has shown good performance characteristics in the blood culture negative population with sensitivity ranging from 73% for culture negative candidiasis to 93% for proven/probable candidiasis [51]. Specificity for both groups was over 90%.
1.5 Treatment
Multiple guidelines exist to assist the clinician with ens uring appropriate treatment across the spectrum of invasive candidiasis [52–55]. Overall, treatment of the solid organ transplant is the same as treatment for the non-transplant patient. As such, the focus here will be on selected types of infection.
Candidemia initial regimen should be based on both severity of illness and the potential for a resistant isolate, in particular C. glabrata and C. krusei, but most experts agree that echinocandins are preferred as initial therapy for most patients with candidemia [55]. For empiric therapy, echinocandins are generally preferred in the critically ill, those with a recent history of or present fluconazole use, or colonization with a resistant isolate. The TRANSNET study, performed between 2000 and 2006, documented an overall fluconazole resistance rate at that time of 16%, with C. glabrata and C. krusei comprising 30% of all isolates [13]. Lacking those risk factors, fluconazole is a reasonable option for empiric therapy in the non-acutely ill person. Once the species and susceptibilities are determined, targeted therapy can be chosen. Treatment should continue for at least 14 days from the first negative culture with an attempt to influence source control, in particular the removal of intravascular catheters [55].
For candiduria, the decision to treat should be on the basis of symptoms and/or findings consistent with a urinary tract infection. If the patient is asymptomatic but neutropenic or undergoing a urologic procedure, then treatment is warranted. The kidney(s) should be assessed for the presence of a fungal ball and surgical removal of the obstruction pursued if found. Echinocandins are poorly excreted into the urine, therefore fluconazole is the treatment of choice for most Candida urinary tract infections. If a fluconazole-resistant isolate is isolated, then a lipid amphotericin-B preparation can be used, with or without flucytosine [55].
Ocular candidiasis is another circumstance where echinocandins fall short in their ability to penetrate a particular tissue. Again, lipid amphotericin-B products and fluconazole are the agents of choice. Consultation with ophthalmology should be obtained early to assess the need for aggressive surgical intervention with vitrectomy [55].
Treatment of end-organ infection, such as pulmonary, intra-peritoneal, or cardiovascular candidiasis should be driven by species identification and susceptibilities. Duration of therapy will need to be tailored to the individual patient on the basis of ability to drain the infected material and reverse the source of contamination.
There is emerging evidence of the development of resistance to echinocandins, in particular in C. glabrata. C. parapsilosis has been noted to have, on average, higher minimum inhibitory concentrations against the echinocandins, but there is little correlation to these values and clinical response to therapy with echinocandins [56–60]. Rates of resistance appear to vary significantly across centers. The presence of azole and/or echinocandin resistance should be explored among patients failing to respond as expected to either of these therapies.
The other aspect of treatment is monitoring for drug–drug interactions (DDIs) . While the echinocandins have minimal DDIs, fluconazole and other azole agents are well documented to have many potential DDIs, and care should be taken to adjust immunosuppressant dosing, especially with use of the calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and the mTOR inhibitors, everlimus and sirolimus [61, 62].
1.6 Prophylaxis
There is a subset of intra-abdominal transplant patients who are high risk for invasive candidiasis. Criteria to determine high-risk is best established in liver transplant recipients; defined as Candida colonization, 40 or more units of cellular blood products transfused, retransplantation, choledochojejunostomy, and prolonged operation, having two or more of these factors warrants prophylaxis [54]. Additionally, a MELD score >30 has been shown to increase the odds of a post-transplant infection of any type [63]. There were few documented fungal infections in this study; however, the broader use of MELD has overlapped with the growing use of anti-fungal prophylaxis. This confounds the assessment of the value of MELD as a predictor of invasive fungal infection (IFI), but nevertheless, a high MELD score should be considered a risk factor for IFI and taken into consideration when deciding to give anti-fungal prophylaxis in the early post-transplant period.
A meta-analysis of antifungal prophylaxis of any sort demonstrated a decrease in all types of candidiasis and improvement of mortality attributable to fungal infections, but without an impact on overall mortality [64]. Fluconazole has been shown to be superior to both nystatin and placebo in preventing infections caused by Candida and is well tolerated [65, 66]. Caspofungin has demonstrated efficacy but has not been studied in a randomized, comparative trial [67]. Anidulafungin has been shown to be equally effective for antifungal prophylaxis when compared to fluconazole in a randomized, controlled trial of 200 liver transplant recipients that met the criteria for needing prophylaxis [68]. A 2008 survey of liver transplant centers in North America showed three quarters of programs used targeted prophylaxis among high-risk recipients, and fluconazole was the most commonly used agent [69]. Prophylaxis should be discontinued no more than 4 weeks after transplant unless there are ongoing concerns for invasive candidiasis.
There are no clinical trials to assess the role of antifungal prophylaxis in small bowel transplants; however given its presence as a colonizer in the gastrointestinal tract and high rate of infection, fluconazole is commonly used for this purpose [70]. Pancreatic transplantation also carries a high rate of fungal infection with one study showing the benefit of fluconazole prophylaxis on decreased candidiasis and infection free survival [71].
2 Cryptococcus
2.1 Epidemiology
Cryptococcus is an encaps ulated budding yeast capable of causing a disease with a variety of manifestations. Cryptococcus neoformans has long been the predominant disease causing species, but the emergence of Cryptococcus gattii throughout the world is becoming a formidable challenge. Originally recognized in Australia and Papua New Guinea, C. gattii has now been reported across the globe [72].
Comprising 8% of all IFIs in the TRANSNET dataset, the 146 cases of cryptococcosis were the third most common fungal pathogen in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients [1]. The incidence of cryptococcosis in that study was approximately 0.2% of all solid organ transplant patients. Literature reviews of reported cases have shown a much higher incidence in SOT recipients, ranging from 1.56 to 2.8, but these represent cumulative estimates, whereas the TRANSNET data are based on calculated annual incidence [73, 74]. Cryptococcosis is rare in stem cell transplant recipients. The TRANSNET study identified only 6 cases among 16,200 enrolled stem cell transplant recipients [75]. While infection can occur any time after transplant, multiple studies show a median time to infection of 19–21 months post-transplantation [1, 74, 76]. Infection in the first month raises the possibility of pre-existing infection in the recipient or donor-derived infection [77, 78].
2.2 Pathogenesis
Primary infection in humans occurs through inhalation of infectious particles, though uncertainty remains over just what type of particle begins the cascade that ultimately leads to active disease. Current data suggests humans are exposed at a high rate at a young age with the organism remaining dormant for a prolonged period of time before later causing disease [79–81]. This is not uniform worldwide, however, as a study of exposure rates in children from the Philippines and two regions of New York demonstrated high variability in serologic positivity among children from the Bronx, NY, Dutchess County, NY and the Philippines [82]. A study to determine pre-transplant exposure to Cryptococcus in SOT recipients who were diagnosed with disease exhibited evidence of antibody responses in 52% [83]. That group also developed cryptococcosis much earlier in the post-transplant period, 5.6 months from the time of transplant rather than 40.6 months in the group that did not have evidence of pre-transplant antibodies against Cryptococcus. These data suggest that most cases of post-transplantation cryptococcosis are due to a reactivation event.
The polysaccharide capsule plays a key role in its ability to cause disease and evade the host immune system. It has been shown to inhibit phagocytosis and reduce the production and effectiveness of the innate immune response, including cytokines and the complement pathway [84]. Once phagocytosed and intracellular, the capsule enhances the ability of the yeast to survive oxidative stress [85]. Inoculation of a mouse with a capsule deficient strain of Cryptococcus leads to an increased inflammatory response and minimal production of invasive disease compared to a capsular Cryptococcus strain [86]. Further evidence of the importance of the capsule in the virulence of C. neoformans is found in the animal model. When one deletes the CAP59 gene responsible for capsule formation, this causes a loss of virulence in a mouse model of cryptococcal meningitis; the transformation of the avirulent strain with a plasmid containing the CAP59 gene restores its virulence in this model [87].
2.3 Clinical Manifestations
Cryptococcus causes a variety of clinical syndromes. In the solid organ transplant population, there is a higher frequency of isolated pulmonary disease when compared to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) population [88]. Disseminated disease remains a frequent occurrence with the bloodstream, central nervous system (CNS), skin and soft tissue, and urinary tract as potential sites of disease.
2.3.1 Pulmonary
As the primary site of most infections, the lungs are the most common site of disease, and patients can present either with primary or reactivation disease. Pulmonary disease in the SOT population can range from an asymptomatic nodular infiltrate to lobar consolidation, a mass-like infiltrate, cavitary disease, or diffuse nodular infiltrates [89, 90]. Studies of cryptococcosis in SOT recipients have found that 25–39% of cases will have disease limited to the lungs [1, 88, 89]. Higher doses of steroids have been associated with a higher rate of symptomatic and disseminated diseases [89, 91]. Duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis spans a wide range, with one study of solid organ transplant recipients reporting the presence of symptoms from 1 to 97 days [92]. Severity of illness can range from asymptomatic disease to fulminant respiratory failure [93]. Compared to HIV patients, SOT recipients have a higher rate of pulmonary disease with less CNS involvement [88]. However, the diagnosis of pulmonary disease should prompt a search for infection elsewhere, in particular a lumbar puncture to assess for involvement of the CNS [94].
2.3.2 Central Nervous System
As noted above, central nervous system involvement occurs at a lower frequency in SOT patients compared to HIV patients, but it remains the most common site of extrapulmonary involvement among SOT patients with cryptococcosis, occurring in 44–62% of these patients [1, 88, 95, 96]. While presenting symptoms vary, asymptomatic meningeal disease likely occurs rarely, patients can present acutely with symptoms occurring for only 2 days to several weeks [97]. Abnormal mental status, fungemia, late-onset disease (defined as more than 24 months post-transplant), and a serum cryptococcal antigen titer >1:64 have been found to be associated with an increased risk of CNS involvement [95].
Focal parenchymal lesions with or without evidence of meningitis may occur in SOT recipients [98]. Focal parenchymal lesions without meningitis are an uncommon manifestation of disease in this population. In one study, 10% of patients had focal parenchymal lesions while 13% had meningeal enhancement. Additionally, the presence of a focal meningeal lesion was associated with higher CSF cryptococcal antigen titers compared to parenchymal lesions [98]. Finally, among those with CNS infections, the presence of abnormal neuroimaging findings at diagnosis was more likely to meet the diagnostic criteria for immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome later in their treatment course [99].
2.3.3 Bloodstream Infection
Rates of blood culture positivity indicating disseminated disease vary, in part due to a lack of consistent collection of the blood cultures. One study of 178 cases had 38% of blood cultures grow Cryptococcus, however cultures were only collected on 39 patients [74]. Other studies have shown lower rates of bloodstream infection, with the Cryptococcal Collaborative Transplant Study Group showing 21% overall but significantly more common in CNS disease with 36% of patients who were fungemic [76, 98]. Positive blood cultures were also associated with increased 90-day mortality [76]. A separate single-center study of cryptococcal meningitis in SOT recipients demonstrated similar observations with 39% of patients with CNS disease having positive blood cultures [97].
2.3.4 Skin and Soft Tissue
Cutaneous and subcutaneous infection is the third most common form of cryptococcosis in the SOT population, comprising 10–18% of cases [88, 100]. Appearance varies greatly, from cellulitis to abscess and ulcer formation to deep nodular and panniculitis lesions having been reported in a variety of anatomic locations [100]. Clues that should make the clinician suspect cryptococcosis rather than a bacterial etiology should include the following: bilateral or disseminated lesions, a nodular component to palpation or appearance, atypical anatomic location, tissue necrosis, and failure to respond to conventional anti-bacterial agents.
2.3.5 Urinary Tract
The prostate and urinary tract are known reservoirs for fungal infections, however reports of cryptococcal infection there in SOT patients are rare. Involvement of the prostate and the kidney have both been reported [101, 102].
2.4 Diagnosis
Multiple reliable means of establishing a diagnosis of cryptococcosis exist: cryptococcal antigen assay of bodily fluid (primarily serum and cerebral spinal fluid), routine and fungal culture, and characteristic findings on histopathology and/or cytology of pathologic samples.
2.4.1 Cryptococcal Antigen
A variety of types of antigen assays to detect the capsular polysaccharide antigen exist. The most experience has been developed with latex agglutination and enzyme immunoassays, although more recently a lateral flow assay with potential utility as a point-of-care test has been developed [103–105]. All methods display a high degree of sensitivity and specificity, approaching 100% depending on the sample type and clinical syndrome. One group in whom the assay performs less well is the lung transplant population, where the serum assay may have decreased sensitivity [89, 106].
2.4.2 Culture
Cryptococcus species do not require specialized media for reliable culture, growing readily on standard bacterial media such as blood agar as well as standard fungal media such as Sabouraud’s dextrose agar [107]. Certain types of media can be used to increase the sensitivity of culture, with brain heart infusion agar potentially improving the yield [108]. The organism can be cultured from tissue or bodily fluid collected at the site of disease, whether it be a tissue biopsy, blood culture, pulmonary specimen, cerebral spine fluid, or urine. The time to positive culture result for Cryptococcus tends to be slower than for bacterial or other yeast organisms, usually 3–5 days before growth is evident [107].
2.4.3 Histopathology
Microscopic examination of specimens, either of tissue or fluid, can be an important addition to prompt diagnosis and determining sites of involvement. Several stains can be helpful to distinguish Cryptococcus from other fungal infections. India ink has classically been used to highlight the capsule of these yeasts in cerebrospinal fluid. The potential difficulty with this simple test is in successfully identifying the yeast from CSF lymphocytes [107]. With increasing use of easier to perform and interpret antigen tests, however, the India ink is being used less frequently. Gomori methanamine silver (GMS) stain is positive but non-specific for most fungal organisms, and mucicarmine stain of tissue is useful in highlighting the capsule and distinguishing Cryptococcus from Histoplasma, Blastomyces, and Candida.
2.4.4 Species Identification
With the increasing recognition of C. gattii as a cause of human disease and the comparative difficulties in treating this organism, attention must also be placed on proper species identification with the diagnosis of cryptococcosis. The two main species can be differentiated when grown on agar that is supplemented with l-canavanine, glycine, and bromthymol blue (CGB agar). C. gattii isolates turning the agar blue, while the agar remains yellow with C. neoformans isolates [109]. Genetic typing to determine C. neoformans or C. gattii is generally used with more specialized labs being able to determine the specific subtype of C. gattii for epidemiologic purposes and potentially tracing acquisition to a particular exposure [108].
2.5 Management
The management of cryptococcosis in SOT recipients is largely based on more recent data generated from the HIV epidemic which has been extrapolated to the SOT population, and abundant retrospective studies specific to post-organ transplantation. Once the diagnosis of cryptococcosis is established, the extent of the infection should be established, in particular to discern whether there is CNS involvement. A lumbar puncture to measure opening pressure and collect cerebrospinal fluid for microbiologic diagnosis is essential in all patients with proven or suspected cryptococcosis. Elevated opening pressure is frequent but not universal. As discussed above, cerebrospinal fluid can be tested for the presence of cryptococcal antigen, stained and microscopically examined for the presence of yeast, and cultured. The presence or absence of involvement in the CNS guides the type and duration of antifungal therapy.
Early studies in HIV patients suggested that amphotericin-B and fluconazole as monotherapy were similar in treating cryptococcal meningitis, however later studies have shown that the combination of amphotericin-B with flucytosine shortens time to sterilization of the CSF and improves outcomes when compared to other interventions [110–112]. Additionally, a prospective study in solid organ transplant recipients noted improved mortality in transplant recipients with cryptococcal meningitis when a lipid formulation of amphotericin was used rather than amphotericin-B deoxycholate [113]. Disseminated disease and fungemic patients also benefit from initial therapy with amphotericin-B, however no specific trials have investigated this. Treatment of isolated, extra-neural disease can be monotherapy with fluconazole, depending on disease severity, with an avoidance of the potential nephrotoxic consequences of amphotericin-B. Similarly, duration of therapy depends on disease location and severity. When amphotericin-B products are being used for induction of disseminated, CNS, or severe disease it should be in conjunction with flucytosine for a minimum of 2 weeks if this regimen can be tolerated [94, 114]. This could potentially be extended if the patient is slow to respond and still with significant symptoms or evidence of disease at 2 weeks. If amphotericin is given without flucytosine, induction should continue for at least 4 weeks [94, 114]. Following the completion of induction therapy, the patient can be transitioned to a fluconazole consolidation phase for 8–10 weeks dosed at 6–12 mg/kg (generally 400–800 mg) daily though dose adjusted, if needed, for renal function [94, 114]. Finally, therapy can be completed with a further 6–12 months of fluconazole maintenance at a lower dose of 200–400 mg daily. For mild to moderate, localized, extra-neural disease that does not require amphotericin-B induction, fluconazole should be given for 6–12 months at 400 mg daily [94, 114].
Other potential options for treatment that have been studied in some fashion are the extended-spectrum triazoles including voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole, however there are insufficient clinical data to support their use in this setting.
Calcineurin pathways exist in Cryptococcus as a means for governing growth and are key in allowing the fungus to grow at higher temperatures, such as that of the human body [115]. Blocking this pathway via the addition of the calcineurin-inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus has been shown to eliminate the ability of Cryptococcus to grow at higher temperatures [116]. Indeed, these calcineurin-inhibitors have been shown to act in a synergistic manner with anti-fungal agents against Cryptococcus isolates obtained from clinical cases [117]. Additionally, SOT patients with a calcineurin-inhibitor as part of their immunosuppressive regimen appear to have a lower risk of mortality and possibly less CNS involvement in the setting of cryptococcosis compared to those not receiving one of those agents [76].
Another aspect of treatment that should be considered is the potential for drug–drug interactions, in particular with the azole agents. Calcineurin inhibitors require their doses to be decreased when co-administered with azoles [62]. Similarly, mTOR inhibitors also require dose decreases however in an even greater magnitude that can completely restrict their concurrent use [61]. The presence of a an opportunistic infection such as cryptococcosis generally leads to a reduction of the overall immunosuppression as allowed and these interactions require careful monitoring to ensure that goal is met safely.
The European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the American Society for Transplantation have developed recommendations to guide treatment each with specific guidance for SOT patients. These recommendations vary based on the extent of the infection [52, 94, 114].
2.6 Complications
One of the hallmarks of CNS cryptococcosis is elevated intracranial pressure. This problem is generally relieved by drainage of fluid via lumbar puncture. If increased pressure persists in spite of drainage, this can lead to a need for more continuous diversion of cerebrospinal fluid. In particular, ventriculoperitoneal shunting has been shown to be safe and effective in managing this issue [118, 119]. A trial to assess the potential of acetazolamide in HIV patients with CNS cryptococcosis to reduce intracranial pressure was terminated early due to serious adverse events and a lack of benefit [120]. There are no studies designed to examine a benefit to steroids for the control of increased intracranial pressure in the setting of cryptococcal meningitis. One HIV treatment trial did track high dose steroid usage and showed worse mortality and clinical response in those that received steroids compared to those that did not [121]. The Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for Cryptococcus has specifically recommend against the use of steroids in this setting [114].
With reductions in total immunosuppression in the face of an opportunistic infection, the potential exists to develop immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). This has been reported in the SOT population [122, 123]. The occurrence of IRIS has been associated with an increased risk of allograft loss in renal transplant recipients [124]. A lack of inflammation in the CSF (fewer than 20 WBCs) at the time of diagnosis has been shown to be a risk factor for the development of IRIS in the HIV population [125]. In the SOT population, discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitors and CNS disease were associated with an increased risk of IRIS, however it did not appear to increase the risk of death [99]. There are no trials to assess potential benefit of steroids or other therapy for IRIS. Anecdotal evidence to support the use of steroids exists and guidelines suggest their use as a component of the treatment of severe IRIS with complications [94, 114, 122].
2.7 Mortality
Estimates of mortality at 90 days range from 14% to 21% amongst all SOT patients with cryptococ cosis of any type [76, 88, 96]. The TRANSNET study found a 27% mortality at 1 year following infection [1]. Mortality rates appear similar when compared to HIV patients [88, 96].
2.8 Prophylaxis
While secondary prophylaxis following cryptococcosis can be considered, there have been no trials to assess for a benefit related to this. Relapse has been reported as rare when patients are appropriately treated [126]. There have been no trials to assess for the potential benefit of primarily prophylaxis in the SOT population.
3 Other Yeasts
3.1 Trichosporon
Trichosporon is a basidiomycetous yeast found worldwide and in the same family as Cryptococcus [127]. The most common species in clinical disease are T. asahii, T. mucoides, and T. asteroides [127]. It has generally been associated with hematologic malignancies, but is reported in a variety of forms in solid organ transplant recipients [128, 129]. Similar to other yeasts as well as bacteria, it can form biofilms on prosthetic surfaces and broadly increase its resistance to anti-fungal agents [130]. The most common forms of invasive disease are fungemia, urinary tract infections, peritonitis, and endocarditis [127]. Trichosporon is notable in particular for the poor treatment activity of the echinocandin class of anti-fungal agents [131]. This should be kept in mind in cases of breakthrough yeast infection while patients are being treated with an echinocandin [132]. The activity of the triazoles and amphotericin-B vary according to species, indicating a need to ensure full identification of the organism to allow for optimal treatment [133].
3.2 Rhodotorula
Rhodotorula is also a basidiomycetous yeast with a predominance for Asia and the regions of the Pacific [134]. The yeast produces carotenoid pigments and colonies can appear salmon to pink depending on the species isolated [135]. The most common species causing pathogenic disease in humans are R. mucilaginosa and R. glutinis [136, 137]. The most common form of invasive disease is fungemia, however reports of endocarditis, endophthalmitis, and peritonitis also exist [134, 136, 138]. Reports indicate an association with hematologic malignancies and the presence of a central venous catheter, however it has also been reported in SOT recipients [137–139]. The triazoles have generally poor in vitro activity versus Rhodotorula species, but amphotericin-B MICs are generally acceptable [140]. Rhodotorula species demonstrate in vitro resistance to the echinocandins, and these agents should be avoided to treat these organisms [138].
4 Other Considerations
Dimorphic fungi can appear as yeast forms in tissue specimens and blood cultures. This includes Histoplasma, Blastomyces, Coccidioides, and Paracoccidioides as the most common agents. Similarly, patients with fungemia due to one of these organisms are usually initially identified simply as “yeasts,” and very often patients are begun on an echinocandin therapy based on an assumption that the organism is a Candida species. Echinocandins have little in vitro activity versus the endemic mycoses and Cryptococcus species, and should be avoided in these circumstances. Rather, in the proper clinical setting, these organisms should be suspected and thoroughly evaluated through a thoughtful diagnostic work-up and treatment adjusted appropriately. Another potential confounding organism is Fusarium , which in spite of being a mold may initially appear as a yeast on blood culture broth, leading to the mistaken impression of a diagnosis of candidemia [141].
References
Pappas PG, Alexander BD, Andes DR, Hadley S, Kauffman CA, Freifeld A, Anaissie EJ, Brumble LM, Herwaldt L, Ito J, Kontoyiannis DP, Lyon GM, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Park BJ, Patterson TF, Perl TM, Oster RA, Schuster MG, Walker R, Walsh TJ, Wannemuehler KA, Chiller TM. Invasive fungal infections among organ transplant recipients: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(8):1101–11. doi:10.1086/651262.
Pfaller M, Neofytos D, Diekema D, Azie N, Meier-Kriesche HU, Quan SP, Horn D. Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 3648 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH Alliance(R)) registry, 2004–2008. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;74(4):323–31. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.10.003.
Neofytos D, Fishman JA, Horn D, Anaissie E, Chang CH, Olyaei A, Pfaller M, Steinbach WJ, Webster KM, Marr KA. Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010;12(3):220–9. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00492.x.
Pfaller MA, Andes DR, Diekema DJ, Horn DL, Reboli AC, Rotstein C, Franks B, Azie NE. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive candidiasis due to non-albicans species of Candida in 2,496 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) registry 2004–2008. PLoS One. 2014;9(7), e101510. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101510.
Pfaller MA, Moet GJ, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanheira M. Candida bloodstream infections: comparison of species distributions and antifungal resistance patterns in community-onset and nosocomial isolates in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2008–2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(2):561–6. doi:10.1128/aac.01079-10.
Pfaller MA, Moet GJ, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanheira M. Geographic variations in species distribution and echinocandin and azole antifungal resistance rates among Candida bloodstream infection isolates: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008 to 2009). J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(1):396–9. doi:10.1128/jcm.01398-10.
Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence. 2013;4(2):119–28. doi:10.4161/viru.22913.
Saville SP, Lazzell AL, Chaturvedi AK, Monteagudo C, Lopez-Ribot JL. Use of a genetically engineered strain to evaluate the pathogenic potential of yeast cell and filamentous forms during Candida albicans systemic infection in immunodeficient mice. Infect Immun. 2008;76(1):97–102. doi:10.1128/iai.00982-07.
Ramage G, Rajendran R, Sherry L, Williams C. Fungal biofilm resistance. Int J Microbiol. 2012;2012:528521. doi:10.1155/2012/528521.
LaFleur MD, Kumamoto CA, Lewis K. Candida albicans biofilms produce antifungal-tolerant persister cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(11):3839–46. doi:10.1128/aac.00684-06.
Kurnatowska I, Pazurek M, Nowicki M. Case of esophagitis in a posttransplant female patient. Ann Transplant. 2007;12(3):39–42.
Jones JM, Glass NR, Belzer FO. Fatal Candida esophagitis in two diabetics after renal transplantation. Arch Surg. 1982;117(4):499–501.
Lockhart SR, Wagner D, Iqbal N, Pappas PG, Andes DR, Kauffman CA, Brumble LM, Hadley S, Walker R, Ito JI, Baddley JW, Chiller T, Park BJ. Comparison of in vitro susceptibility characteristics of Candida species from cases of invasive candidiasis in solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients: Transplant-Associated Infections Surveillance Network (TRANSNET), 2001 to 2006. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(7):2404–10. doi:10.1128/JCM.02474-10.
Guery BP, Arendrup MC, Auzinger G, Azoulay E, Borges Sa M, Johnson EM, Muller E, Putensen C, Rotstein C, Sganga G, Venditti M, Zaragoza Crespo R, Kullberg BJ. Management of invasive candidiasis and candidemia in adult non-neutropenic intensive care unit patients: Part I. Epidemiology and diagnosis. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(1):55–62. doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1338-7.
Collins LA, Samore MH, Roberts MS, Luzzati R, Jenkins RL, Lewis WD, Karchmer AW. Risk factors for invasive fungal infections complicating orthotopic liver transplantation. J Infect Dis. 1994;170(3):644–52.
Kamath PS, Kim WR. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology. 2007;45(3):797–805. doi:10.1002/hep.21563.
Lichtenstern C, Hochreiter M, Zehnter VD, Brenner T, Hofer S, Mieth M, Buchler MW, Martin E, Weigand MA, Schemmer P, Busch CJ. Pretransplant model for end stage liver disease score predicts posttransplant incidence of fungal infections after liver transplantation. Mycoses. 2013;56(3):350–7. doi:10.1111/myc.12041.
Delgado J, Calvo N, Gomis A, Perez-Flores I, Rodriguez A, Ridao N, Valero R, Sanchez-Fructuoso AI. Candiduria in renal transplant recipients: incidence, clinical repercussion, and treatment indication. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(8):2944–6. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.08.019.
Safdar N, Slattery WR, Knasinski V, Gangnon RE, Li Z, Pirsch JD, Andes D. Predictors and outcomes of candiduria in renal transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(10):1413–21. doi:10.1086/429620.
Bagnasco SM, Subramanian AK, Desai NM. Fungal infection presenting as giant cell tubulointerstitial nephritis in kidney allograft. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14(3):288–91. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00676.x.
Westervelt JD, Foster KW, Miles CD. Renal allograft pyelonephritis and fungemia due to Candida krusei. Clin Kidney J. 2014;7(1):79–80. doi:10.1093/ckj/sft160.
Rex JH. Candida in the peritoneum: passenger or pathogen? Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3):902–3. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000202129.19154.64.
Montravers P, Dupont H, Gauzit R, Veber B, Auboyer C, Blin P, Hennequin C, Martin C. Candida as a risk factor for mortality in peritonitis. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3):646–52. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000201889.39443.d2.
Wood GC, Mueller EW, Croce MA, Boucher BA, Fabian TC. Candida sp. isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage: clinical significance in critically ill trauma patients. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(4):599–603. doi:10.1007/s00134-005-0065-6.
Rello J, Esandi ME, Diaz E, Mariscal D, Gallego M, Valles J. The role of Candida sp. isolated from bronchoscopic samples in nonneutropenic patients. Chest. 1998;114(1):146–9.
Schaenman JM, Rosso F, Austin JM, Baron EJ, Gamberg P, Miller J, Oyer PE, Robbins RC, Montoya JG. Trends in invasive disease due to Candida species following heart and lung transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2009;11(2):112–21. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00364.x.
Hadjiliadis D, Howell DN, Davis RD, Lawrence CM, Rea JB, Tapson VF, Perfect JR, Palmer SM. Anastomotic infections in lung transplant recipients. Ann Transplant. 2000;5(3):13–9.
Oude Lashof AM, Rothova A, Sobel JD, Ruhnke M, Pappas PG, Viscoli C, Schlamm HT, Oborska IT, Rex JH, Kullberg BJ. Ocular manifestations of candidemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(3):262–8. doi:10.1093/cid/cir355.
Nagao M, Saito T, Doi S, Hotta G, Yamamoto M, Matsumura Y, Matsushima A, Ito Y, Takakura S, Ichiyama S. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of ocular candidiasis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73(2):149–52. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.03.006.
Dedi R, Kumar A, Chang B, Wright MJ, Brownjohn AM. Candidal endophthalmitis in a renal transplant patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(3):637–8.
Papanicolaou GA, Meyers BR, Fuchs WS, Guillory SL, Mendelson MH, Sheiner P, Emre S, Miller C. Infectious ocular complications in orthotopic liver transplant patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(6):1172–7.
Del Pozo JL, van de Beek D, Daly RC, Pulido JS, McGregor CG, Patel R. Incidence and clinical characteristics of ocular infections after heart transplantation: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Transplant. 2009;23(4):484–9. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01026.x.
Singh N, Huprikar S, Burdette SD, Morris MI, Blair JE, Wheat LJ. Donor-derived fungal infections in organ transplant recipients: guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation, infectious diseases community of practice. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(9):2414–28. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04100.x.
Addeo P, Saouli AC, Woehl-Jaegle ML, Ellero B, Oussoultzoglou E, Marcellin L, Bachellier P. Candida albicans arteritis transmitted by preservation fluid after liver transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2014;19:64–7. doi:10.12659/aot.889831.
Debska-Slizien A, Chrobak L, Bzoma B, Perkowska A, Zadrozny D, Chamienia A, Kostro J, Milecka A, Bronk M, Sledzinski Z, Rutkowski B. Candida arteritis in kidney transplant recipients: case report and review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015. doi:10.1111/tid.12388.
Rodrigues BF, Natario AS, Vizinho RS, Jorge CM, Weigert AL, Martinho A, Toscano C, Marques TT, Machado DS. Candida species contamination of preservation fluid-outcome of renal transplantation in 6 patients. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(6):2215–9. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.024.
Levesque E, Suet G, Merle JC, Compagnon P, Amathieu R, Feray C, Botterel F, Foulet F, Azoulay D, Dhonneur G. Candida vascular complication in a liver transplant recipient due to yeast contamination of preservation solution. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(5):827–9. doi:10.1111/tid.12260.
Veroux M, Corona D, Scriffignano V, Caglia P, Gagliano M, Giuffrida G, Gona F, Sciacca A, Giaquinta A, Oliveri S, Sinagra N, Tallarita T, Zerbo D, Sorbello M, Parrinello L, Veroux P. Contamination of preservation fluid in kidney transplantation: single-center analysis. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(4):1043–5. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.041.
Janny S, Bert F, Dondero F, Durand F, Guerrini P, Merckx P, Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Belghiti J, Mantz J, Paugam-Burtz C. Microbiological findings of culture-positive preservation fluid in liver transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13(1):9–14. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00558.x.
Albano L, Bretagne S, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Kacso I, Desnos-Ollivier M, Guerrini P, Le Luong T, Cassuto E, Dromer F, Lortholary O. Evidence that graft-site candidiasis after kidney transplantation is acquired during organ recovery: a multicenter study in France. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(2):194–202. doi:10.1086/595688.
Lacroix C, Gicquel A, Sendid B, Meyer J, Accoceberry I, Francois N, Morio F, Desoubeaux G, Chandenier J, Kauffmann-Lacroix C, Hennequin C, Guitard J, Nassif X, Bougnoux ME. Evaluation of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems for the identification of Candida species. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(2):153–8. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12210.
Tan KE, Ellis BC, Lee R, Stamper PD, Zhang SX, Carroll KC. Prospective evaluation of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system in a hospital clinical microbiology laboratory for identification of bacteria and yeasts: a bench-by-bench study for assessing the impact on time to identification and cost-effectiveness. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(10):3301–8. doi:10.1128/jcm.01405-12.
Wilson DA, Joyce MJ, Hall LS, Reller LB, Roberts GD, Hall GS, Alexander BD, Procop GW. Multicenter evaluation of a Candida albicans peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization probe for characterization of yeast isolates from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2909–12. doi:10.1128/jcm.43.6.2909-2912.2005.
Hall L, Le Febre KM, Deml SM, Wohlfiel SL, Wengenack NL. Evaluation of the Yeast Traffic Light PNA FISH probes for identification of Candida species from positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(4):1446–8. doi:10.1128/jcm.06148-11.
Mylonakis E, Clancy CJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Garey KW, Alangaden GJ, Vazquez JA, Groeger JS, Judson MA, Vinagre YM, Heard SO, Zervou FN, Zacharioudakis IM, Kontoyiannis DP, Pappas PG. T2 magnetic resonance assay for the rapid diagnosis of candidemia in whole blood: a clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(6):892–9. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu959.
Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Finding the “missing 50%” of invasive candidiasis: how nonculture diagnostics will improve understanding of disease spectrum and transform patient care. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(9):1284–92. doi:10.1093/cid/cit006.
Karageorgopoulos DE, Vouloumanou EK, Ntziora F, Michalopoulos A, Rafailidis PI, Falagas ME. β-d-Glucan assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(6):750–70. doi:10.1093/cid/ciq206.
Wheat LJ. Approach to the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis and candidiasis. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30(2):367–77. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2009.02.012. viii.
Levesque E, El Anbassi S, Sitterle E, Foulet F, Merle JC, Botterel F. Contribution of (1,3)-beta-d-glucan to diagnosis of invasive candidiasis after liver transplantation. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(3):771–6. doi:10.1128/jcm.03018-14.
Alexander BD, Smith PB, Davis RD, Perfect JR, Reller LB. The (1,3)β-d-glucan test as an aid to early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections following lung transplantation. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(11):4083–8. doi:10.1128/jcm.01183-10.
Avni T, Leibovici L, Paul M. PCR diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(2):665–70. doi:10.1128/jcm.01602-10.
Gavalda J, Meije Y, Fortun J, Roilides E, Saliba F, Lortholary O, Munoz P, Grossi P, Cuenca-Estrella M, ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH). Invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20 Suppl 7:27–48. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12660.
Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin Jr DK, Calandra TF, Edwards Jr JE, Filler SG, Fisher JF, Kullberg BJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(5):503–35. doi:10.1086/596757.
Silveira FP, Kusne S, AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Candida infections in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13 Suppl 4:220–7. doi:10.1111/ajt.12114.
Pappas PG, Kauffman C, Andes D, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;62:e1–50.
Alexander BD, Johnson MD, Pfeiffer CD, Jimenez-Ortigosa C, Catania J, Booker R, Castanheira M, Messer SA, Perlin DS, Pfaller MA. Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(12):1724–32. doi:10.1093/cid/cit136.
Beyda ND, John J, Kilic A, Alam MJ, Lasco TM, Garey KW. FKS mutant Candida glabrata: risk factors and outcomes in patients with candidemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(6):819–25. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu407.
Cleveland AA, Harrison LH, Farley MM, Hollick R, Stein B, Chiller TM, Lockhart SR, Park BJ. Declining incidence of candidemia and the shifting epidemiology of Candida resistance in two US metropolitan areas, 2008–2013: results from population-based surveillance. PLoS One. 2015;10(3), e0120452. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120452.
Matsumoto E, Boyken L, Tendolkar S, McDanel J, Castanheira M, Pfaller M, Diekema D. Candidemia surveillance in Iowa: emergence of echinocandin resistance. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79(2):205–8. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.02.016.
Marti-Carrizosa M, Sanchez-Reus F, March F, Canton E, Coll P. Implication of Candida parapsilosis FKS1 and FKS2 mutations in reduced echinocandin susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(6):3570–3. doi:10.1128/aac.04922-14.
Saad AH, DePestel DD, Carver PL. Factors influencing the magnitude and clinical significance of drug interactions between azole antifungals and select immunosuppressants. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26(12):1730–44. doi:10.1592/phco.26.12.1730.
Dodds-Ashley E. Management of drug and food interactions with azole antifungal agents in transplant recipients. Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30(8):842–54. doi:10.1592/phco.30.8.842.
Sun HY, Cacciarelli TV, Singh N. Identifying a targeted population at high risk for infections after liver transplantation in the MELD era. Clin Transplant. 2011;25(3):420–5. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01262.x.
Cruciani M, Mengoli C, Malena M, Bosco O, Serpelloni G, Grossi P. Antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Transpl. 2006;12(5):850–8. doi:10.1002/lt.20690.
Winston DJ, Pakrasi A, Busuttil RW. Prophylactic fluconazole in liver transplant recipients. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(10):729–37.
Lumbreras C, Cuervas-Mons V, Jara P, del Palacio A, Turrion VS, Barrios C, Moreno E, Noriega AR, Paya CV. Randomized trial of fluconazole versus nystatin for the prophylaxis of Candida infection following liver transplantation. J Infect Dis. 1996;174(3):583–8.
Fortun J, Martin-Davila P, Montejo M, Munoz P, Cisneros JM, Ramos A, Aragon C, Blanes M, San Juan R, Gavalda J, Llinares P, GESITRA Study Group. Prophylaxis with caspofungin for invasive fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2009;87(3):424–35. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181932e76.
Winston DJ, Limaye AP, Pelletier S, Safdar N, Morris MI, Meneses K, Busuttil RW, Singh N. Randomized, double-blind trial of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(12):2758–64. doi:10.1111/ajt.12963.
Singh N, Wagener MM, Cacciarelli TV, Levitsky J. Antifungal management practices in liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(2):426–31. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02089.x.
Guaraldi G, Cocchi S, Codeluppi M, Di Benedetto F, De Ruvo N, Masetti M, Venturelli C, Pecorari M, Pinna AD, Esposito R. Outcome, incidence, and timing of infectious complications in small bowel and multivisceral organ transplantation patients. Transplantation. 2005;80(12):1742–8.
Benedetti E, Gruessner AC, Troppmann C, Papalois BE, Sutherland DE, Dunn DL, Gruessner RW. Intra-abdominal fungal infections after pancreatic transplantation: incidence, treatment, and outcome. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183(4):307–16.
McMullan BJ, Sorrell TC, Chen SC. Cryptococcus gattii infections: contemporary aspects of epidemiology, clinical manifestations and management of infection. Future Microbiol. 2013;8(12):1613–31. doi:10.2217/fmb.13.123.
Sun HY, Wagener MM, Singh N. Cryptococcosis in solid-organ, hematopoietic stem cell, and tissue transplant recipients: evidence-based evolving trends. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(11):1566–76. doi:10.1086/598936.
Husain S, Wagener MM, Singh N. Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients: variables influencing clinical characteristics and outcome. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(3):375–81. doi:10.3201/eid0703.010302.
Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Park BJ, Alexander BD, Anaissie EJ, Walsh TJ, Ito J, Andes DR, Baddley JW, Brown JM, Brumble LM, Freifeld AG, Hadley S, Herwaldt LA, Kauffman CA, Knapp K, Lyon GM, Morrison VA, Papanicolaou G, Patterson TF, Perl TM, Schuster MG, Walker R, Wannemuehler KA, Wingard JR, Chiller TM, Pappas PG. Prospective surveillance for invasive fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2001–2006: overview of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET) Database. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(8):1091–100. doi:10.1086/651263.
Singh N, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Gupta KL, John GT, del Busto R, Klintmalm GB, Somani J, Lyon GM, Pursell K, Stosor V, Munoz P, Limaye AP, Kalil AC, Pruett TL, Garcia-Diaz J, Humar A, Houston S, House AA, Wray D, Orloff S, Dowdy LA, Fisher RA, Heitman J, Wagener MM, Husain S, Cryptococcal Collaborative Transplant Study Group. Cryptococcus neoformans in organ transplant recipients: impact of calcineurin-inhibitor agents on mortality. J Infect Dis. 2007;195(5):756–64. doi:10.1086/511438.
Baddley JW, Schain DC, Gupte AA, Lodhi SA, Kayler LK, Frade JP, Lockhart SR, Chiller T, Bynon Jr JS, Bower WA. Transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans by organ transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):e94–8. doi:10.1093/cid/ciq216.
Sun HY, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Forrest GN, Lyon GM, Somani J, Gupta KL, del Busto R, Pruett TL, Sifri CD, Limaye AP, John GT, Klintmalm GB, Pursell K, Stosor V, Morris MI, Dowdy LA, Munoz P, Kalil AC, Garcia-Diaz J, Orloff SL, House AA, Houston SH, Wray D, Huprikar S, Johnson LB, Humar A, Razonable RR, Fisher RA, Husain S, Wagener MM, Singh N, Cryptococcal Collaborative Transplant Study Group. Unrecognized pretransplant and donor-derived cryptococcal disease in organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(9):1062–9. doi:10.1086/656584.
Garcia-Hermoso D, Janbon G, Dromer F. Epidemiological evidence for dormant Cryptococcus neoformans infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(10):3204–9.
Chen LC, Goldman DL, Doering TL, Pirofski L, Casadevall A. Antibody response to Cryptococcus neoformans proteins in rodents and humans. Infect Immun. 1999;67(5):2218–24.
Goldman DL, Khine H, Abadi J, Lindenberg DJ, Pirofski L, Niang R, Casadevall A. Serologic evidence for Cryptococcus neoformans infection in early childhood. Pediatrics. 2001;107(5), E66.
Davis J, Zheng WY, Glatman-Freedman A, Ng JA, Pagcatipunan MR, Lessin H, Casadevall A, Goldman DL. Serologic evidence for regional differences in pediatric cryptococcal infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26(6):549–51. doi:10.1097/INF.0b013e318047e073.
Saha DC, Goldman DL, Shao X, Casadevall A, Husain S, Limaye AP, Lyon M, Somani J, Pursell K, Pruett TL, Singh N. Serologic evidence for reactivation of cryptococcosis in solid-organ transplant recipients. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007;14(12):1550–4. doi:10.1128/CVI.00242-07.
O'Meara TR, Alspaugh JA. The Cryptococcus neoformans capsule: a sword and a shield. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(3):387–408. doi:10.1128/cmr.00001-12.
Zaragoza O, Chrisman CJ, Castelli MV, Frases S, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Casadevall A. Capsule enlargement in Cryptococcus neoformans confers resistance to oxidative stress suggesting a mechanism for intracellular survival. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(10):2043–57. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01186.x.
Farmer SG, Komorowski RA. Histologic response to capsule-deficient Cryptococcus neoformans. Arch Pathol. 1973;96(6):383–7.
Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ. Complementation of a capsule-deficient mutation of Cryptococcus neoformans restores its virulence. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14(7):4912–9.
Brizendine KD, Baddley JW, Pappas PG. Predictors of mortality and differences in clinical features among patients with Cryptococcosis according to immune status. PLoS One. 2013;8(3), e60431. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060431.
Singh N, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Gupta KL, John GT, del Busto R, Klintmalm GB, Somani J, Lyon GM, Pursell K, Stosor V, Munoz P, Limaye AP, Kalil AC, Pruett TL, Garcia-Diaz J, Humar A, Houston S, House AA, Wray D, Orloff S, Dowdy LA, Fisher RA, Heitman J, Wagener MM, Husain S. Pulmonary cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients: clinical relevance of serum cryptococcal antigen. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(2):e12–8. doi:10.1086/524738.
Mueller NJ, Fishman JA. Asymptomatic pulmonary cryptococcosis in solid organ transplantation: report of four cases and review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis. 2003;5(3):140–3.
Baddley JW, Perfect JR, Oster RA, Larsen RA, Pankey GA, Henderson H, Haas DW, Kauffman CA, Patel R, Zaas AK, Pappas PG. Pulmonary cryptococcosis in patients without HIV infection: factors associated with disseminated disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27(10):937–43. doi:10.1007/s10096-008-0529-z.
Vilchez R, Shapiro R, McCurry K, Kormos R, Abu-Elmagd K, Fung J, Kusne S. Longitudinal study of cryptococcosis in adult solid-organ transplant recipients. Transpl Int. 2003;16(5):336–40. doi:10.1007/s00147-002-0541-7.
Vilchez RA, Linden P, Lacomis J, Costello P, Fung J, Kusne S. Acute respiratory failure associated with pulmonary cryptococcosis in non-aids patients. Chest. 2001;119(6):1865–9.
Baddley JW, Forrest GN. Cryptococcosis in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13 Suppl 4:242–9. doi:10.1111/ajt.12116.
Osawa R, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Forrest GN, Lyon GM, Somani J, Gupta KL, Del Busto R, Pruett TL, Sifri CD, Limaye AP, John GT, Klintmalm GB, Pursell K, Stosor V, Morris MI, Dowdy LA, Munoz P, Kalil AC, Garcia-Diaz J, Orloff S, House AA, Houston S, Wray D, Huprikar S, Johnson LB, Humar A, Razonable RR, Fisher RA, Husain S, Wagener MM, Singh N. Identifying predictors of central nervous system disease in solid organ transplant recipients with cryptococcosis. Transplantation. 2010;89(1):69–74. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181bcda41.
Davis JA, Horn DL, Marr KA, Fishman JA. Central nervous system involvement in cryptococcal infection in individuals after solid organ transplantation or with AIDS. Transpl Infect Dis. 2009;11(5):432–7. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2009.00424.x.
Wu G, Vilchez RA, Eidelman B, Fung J, Kormos R, Kusne S. Cryptococcal meningitis: an analysis among 5,521 consecutive organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2002;4(4):183–8.
Singh N, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Alexander BD, Gupta KL, John GT, del Busto R, Klintmalm GB, Somani J, Lyon GM, Pursell K, Stosor V, Munoz P, Limaye AP, Kalil AC, Pruett TL, Garcia-Diaz J, Humar A, Houston S, House AA, Wray D, Orloff S, Dowdy LA, Fisher RA, Heitman J, Wagener MM, Husain S, Cryptococcal Collaborative Transplant Study Group. Central nervous system cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients: clinical relevance of abnormal neuroimaging findings. Transplantation. 2008;86(5):647–51. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181814e76.
Sun HY, Alexander BD, Huprikar S, Forrest GN, Bruno D, Lyon GM, Wray D, Johnson LB, Sifri CD, Razonable RR, Morris MI, Stoser V, Wagener MM, Singh N. Predictors of immune reconstitution syndrome in organ transplant recipients with cryptococcosis: implications for the management of immunosuppression. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(1):36–44. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu711.
Sun HY, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Forrest GN, Lyon GM, Somani J, Gupta KL, Del Busto R, Pruett TL, Sifri CD, Limaye AP, John GT, Klintmalm GB, Pursell K, Stosor V, Morris MI, Dowdy LA, Munoz P, Kalil AC, Garcia-Diaz J, Orloff SL, House AA, Houston SH, Wray D, Huprikar S, Johnson LB, Humar A, Razonable RR, Fisher RA, Husain S, Wagener MM, Singh N, Cryptococcal Collaborative Transplant Study Group. Cutaneous cryptococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Med Mycol. 2010;48(6):785–91. doi:10.3109/13693780903496617.
Hellman RN, Hinrichs J, Sicard G, Hoover R, Golden P, Hoffsten P. Cryptococcal pyelonephritis and disseminated cryptococcosis in a renal transplant recipient. Arch Intern Med. 1981;141(1):128–30.
Siddiqui TJ, Zamani T, Parada JP. Primary cryptococcal prostatitis and correlation with serum prostate specific antigen in a renal transplant recipient. J Infect. 2005;51(3):e153–7. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2004.12.005.
Binnicker MJ, Jespersen DJ, Bestrom JE, Rollins LO. Comparison of four assays for the detection of cryptococcal antigen. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19(12):1988–90. doi:10.1128/cvi.00446-12.
Jarvis JN, Percival A, Bauman S, Pelfrey J, Meintjes G, Williams GN, Longley N, Harrison TS, Kozel TR. Evaluation of a novel point-of-care cryptococcal antigen test on serum, plasma, and urine from patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(10):1019–23. doi:10.1093/cid/cir613.
Suwantarat N, Dalton JB, Lee R, Green R, Memon W, Carroll KC, Riedel S, Zhang SX. Large-scale clinical validation of a lateral flow immunoassay for detection of cryptococcal antigen in serum and cerebrospinal fluid specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;82(1):54–6. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.01.012.
Aberg JA, Mundy LM, Powderly WG. Pulmonary cryptococcosis in patients without HIV infection. Chest. 1999;115(3):734–40.
Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, Mandell GL, Douglas RG. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th ed. 2015.
Chen SC-A, Meyer W, Sorrell TC. Cryptococcus gattii Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(4):980–1024. doi:10.1128/cmr.00126-13.
Kwon-Chung KJ, Polacheck I, Bennett JE. Improved diagnostic medium for separation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans (serotypes A and D) and Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii (serotypes B and C). J Clin Microbiol. 1982;15(3):535–7.
Dromer F, Bernede-Bauduin C, Guillemot D, Lortholary O, French Cryptococcosis Study Group. Major role for amphotericin B-flucytosine combination in severe cryptococcosis. PLoS One. 2008;3(8), e2870. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002870.
Saag MS, Powderly WG, Cloud GA, Robinson P, Grieco MH, Sharkey PK, Thompson SE, Sugar AM, Tuazon CU, Fisher JF, et al. Comparison of amphotericin B with fluconazole in the treatment of acute AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. The NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(2):83–9. doi:10.1056/nejm199201093260202.
van der Horst CM, Saag MS, Cloud GA, Hamill RJ, Graybill JR, Sobel JD, Johnson PC, Tuazon CU, Kerkering T, Moskovitz BL, Powderly WG, Dismukes WE. Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group and AIDS Clinical Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(1):15–21. doi:10.1056/nejm199707033370103.
Sun HY, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Forrest GN, Lyon GM, Somani J, Gupta KL, del Busto R, Pruett TL, Sifri CD, Limaye AP, John GT, Klintmalm GB, Pursell K, Stosor V, Morris MI, Dowdy LA, Munoz P, Kalil AC, Garcia-Diaz J, Orloff S, House AA, Houston S, Wray D, Huprikar S, Johnson LB, Humar A, Razonable RR, Husain S, Singh N. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B significantly improve outcome in solid organ transplant recipients with central nervous system cryptococcosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(11):1721–8. doi:10.1086/647948.
Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, Harrison TS, Larsen RA, Lortholary O, Nguyen MH, Pappas PG, Powderly WG, Singh N, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(3):291–322. doi:10.1086/649858.
Kraus PR, Nichols CB, Heitman J. Calcium- and calcineurin-independent roles for calmodulin in Cryptococcus neoformans morphogenesis and high-temperature growth. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4(6):1079–87. doi:10.1128/ec.4.6.1079-1087.2005.
Cruz MC, Del Poeta M, Wang P, Wenger R, Zenke G, Quesniaux VF, Movva NR, Perfect JR, Cardenas ME, Heitman J. Immunosuppressive and nonimmunosuppressive cyclosporine analogs are toxic to the opportunistic fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans via cyclophilin-dependent inhibition of calcineurin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44(1):143–9.
Kontoyiannis DP, Lewis RE, Alexander BD, Lortholary O, Dromer F, Gupta KL, John GT, Del Busto R, Klintmalm GB, Somani J, Lyon GM, Pursell K, Stosor V, Munoz P, Limaye AP, Kalil AC, Pruett TL, Garcia-Diaz J, Humar A, Houston S, House AA, Wray D, Orloff S, Dowdy LA, Fisher RA, Heitman J, Albert ND, Wagener MM, Singh N. Calcineurin inhibitor agents interact synergistically with antifungal agents in vitro against Cryptococcus neoformans isolates: correlation with outcome in solid organ transplant recipients with cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(2):735–8. doi:10.1128/AAC.00990-07.
Park MK, Hospenthal DR, Bennett JE. Treatment of hydrocephalus secondary to cryptococcal meningitis by use of shunting. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28(3):629–33. doi:10.1086/515161.
Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Williams MA, Rigamonti D. The use of ventriculoperitoneal shunts for uncontrollable intracranial hypertension without ventriculomegally secondary to HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Surg Neurol. 2005;63(6):529–31. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2004.08.069. discussion 531–522.
Newton PN, le Thai H, Tip NQ, Short JM, Chierakul W, Rajanuwong A, Pitisuttithum P, Chasombat S, Phonrat B, Maek ANW, Teaunadi R, Lalloo DG, White NJ. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of acetazolamide for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure in cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(6):769–72. doi:10.1086/342299.
Graybill JR, Sobel J, Saag M, van Der Horst C, Powderly W, Cloud G, Riser L, Hamill R, Dismukes W. Diagnosis and management of increased intracranial pressure in patients with AIDS and cryptococcal meningitis. The NIAID Mycoses Study Group and AIDS Cooperative Treatment Groups. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(1):47–54. doi:10.1086/313603.
Lanternier F, Chandesris MO, Poiree S, Bougnoux ME, Mechai F, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Viard JP, Galmiche-Rolland L, Lecuit M, Lortholary O. Cellulitis revealing a cryptococcosis-related immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in a renal allograft recipient. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(12):2826–8. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01994.x.
Legris T, Massad M, Purgus R, Vacher-Coponat H, Ranque S, Girard N, Berland Y, Moal V. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome mimicking relapsing cryptococcal meningitis in a renal transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13(3):303–8. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00592.x.
Singh N, Lortholary O, Alexander BD, Gupta KL, John GT, Pursell K, Munoz P, Klintmalm GB, Stosor V, delBusto R, Limaye AP, Somani J, Lyon M, Houston S, House AA, Pruett TL, Orloff S, Humar A, Dowdy L, Garcia-Diaz J, Fisher RA, Husain S. Allograft loss in renal transplant recipients with Cryptococcus neoformans associated immune reconstitution syndrome. Transplantation. 2005;80(8):1131–3. doi:10.1097/01.tp.0000180530.17683.02.
Boulware DR, Bonham SC, Meya DB, Wiesner DL, Park GS, Kambugu A, Janoff EN, Bohjanen PR. Paucity of initial cerebrospinal fluid inflammation in cryptococcal meningitis is associated with subsequent immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(6):962–70. doi:10.1086/655785.
Baddley J, Klausing B, Brizendine K, Kumar V, Julian B, Eckhoff D, Tallaj J, Wille K, Moser S, Pappas P. Treatment of cryptococcosis in solid-organtransplant recipients: relapse is rare after discontinuation of therapy. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:344.
Colombo AL, Padovan AC, Chaves GM. Current knowledge of Trichosporon spp. and Trichosporonosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(4):682–700. doi:10.1128/cmr.00003-11.
Girmenia C, Pagano L, Martino B, D'Antonio D, Fanci R, Specchia G, Melillo L, Buelli M, Pizzarelli G, Venditti M, Martino P. Invasive infections caused by Trichosporon species and Geotrichum capitatum in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective multicenter study from Italy and review of the literature. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(4):1818–28. doi:10.1128/jcm.43.4.1818-1828.2005.
Almeida Junior JN, Song AT, Campos SV, Strabelli TM, Del Negro GM, Figueiredo DS, Motta AL, Rossi F, Guitard J, Benard G, Hennequin C. Invasive Trichosporon infection in solid organ transplant patients: a report of two cases identified using IGS1 ribosomal DNA sequencing and a review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(1):135–40. doi:10.1111/tid.12179.
Iturrieta-Gonzalez IA, Padovan AC, Bizerra FC, Hahn RC, Colombo AL. Multiple species of Trichosporon produce biofilms highly resistant to triazoles and amphotericin B. PLoS One. 2014;9(10), e109553. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109553.
Walsh TJ, Groll A, Hiemenz J, Fleming R, Roilides E, Anaissie E. Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10 Suppl 1:48–66.
Yang MF, Gao HN, Li LJ. A fatal case of Trichosporon asahii fungemia and pneumonia in a kidney transplant recipient during caspofungin treatment. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014;10:759–62. doi:10.2147/tcrm.s67299.
Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Diaz-Guerra TM, Mellado E, Cano V, Tapia C, Perkins A, Gomez-Lopez A, Rodero L, Cuenca-Estrella M. Susceptibility patterns and molecular identification of Trichosporon species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(10):4026–34. doi:10.1128/aac.49.10.4026-4034.2005.
Miceli MH, Diaz JA, Lee SA. Emerging opportunistic yeast infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11(2):142–51. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70218-8.
Hazen KC. New and emerging yeast pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8(4):462–78.
Tuon FF, Costa SF. Rhodotorula infection. A systematic review of 128 cases from literature. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2008;25(3):135–40.
Tuon FF, de Almeida GM, Costa SF. Central venous catheter-associated fungemia due to Rhodotorula spp.—a systematic review. Med Mycol. 2007;45(5):441–7. doi:10.1080/13693780701381289.
Zaas AK, Boyce M, Schell W, Lodge BA, Miller JL, Perfect JR. Risk of fungemia due to Rhodotorula and antifungal susceptibility testing of Rhodotorula isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):5233–5.
Riedel DJ, Johnson JK, Forrest GN. Rhodotorula glutinis fungemia in a liver-kidney transplant patient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2008;10(3):197–200. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2007.00265.x.
Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Meis JF, Gould IM, Fu W, Colombo AL, Rodriguez-Noriega E. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance study, 1997 to 2005: an 8.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(6):1735–45. doi:10.1128/jcm.00409-07.
Nucci M, Anaissie E. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(4):695–704. doi:10.1128/cmr.00014-07.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCarty, T.P., Pappas, P.G. (2016). Yeast Infections After Solid Organ Transplantation. In: Ljungman, P., Snydman, D., Boeckh, M. (eds) Transplant Infections. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28797-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28797-3_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28795-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28797-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)