Abstract
Studies suggest that maintaining family ties can help reduce the likelihood of reoffending, and that while parental imprisonment can increase a child’s likelihood to offend, positive responses to the situation can aid the children’s well-being, attitude and attainment. Drawing on findings from the EU-funded COPING Project on the mental health of children of prisoners, this chapter explores the factors that aid a child’s ability to cope with parental imprisonment and the actions that different stakeholders can take to support them. It identifies some of the mental health impacts at different stages of parental imprisonment, the roles played by non-imprisoned parents/carers and by schools, and suggests options for further clarifying the factors that help and hinder children of prisoners in the short and long term.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and the United Nations Children’s Fund are among the key global intergovernmental actors who deal with children in conflict with the law and children as victims and witnesses of crime.
- 2.
One example is the finding from the COPING study (see below) that children are as affected by a father’s imprisonment as by a mother’s, which went against previous findings that a mother’s imprisonment had more severe effects (due at least in part to the greater likelihood for imprisoned mothers to be raising children on their own, meaning that children would be more likely to change carer and possibly home and school, as well as losing their parent). However, the COPING researchers speculated that this may be due to the cohort of children that participated, almost all of whom were in contact with their imprisoned parent and who were taken to visit by their non-imprisoned parent or carer.
- 3.
This is due both to the widespread non-recognition of this group by authorities and that children and parents may hide their status due to stigma or fears about the actions authorities may take upon discovery.
- 4.
The number is significantly higher than the prison population because many parents, like other prisoners, serve less than a year.
- 5.
SDQ scores refer to Goodman’s (1997) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, which is a behavioural screening instrument eliciting children and young peoples’ perceptions of their conduct, concentration, emotions and social relationships. The SDQ incorporates five different subscales (hyperactivity; emotional symptoms; conduct problems; peer problems; and a prosocial scale) which, when summed, provide a total difficulties score (TDS). It is generally agreed that the SDQ instrument provides one means to measure a child’s mental health.
- 6.
The Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (SES) was devised by Morris Rosenberg (1965) and provides an indication of children and young people's perceived levels of self-esteem (self-evaluation). The scale consists of ten items which are summed to produce an overall score ranging from 10 to 40, where higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Self-esteem is one aspect of a child's well-being and influences aspirations, personal goals and interaction with others.
- 7.
The KIDSCREEN instrument elicits children and young peoples’ ratings of their health and well-being. This is a self-report instrument and covers five dimensions (physical well-being; psychological well-being; autonomy and parental relation; support and peers; and school environment) with a higher score indicating more positive health and well-being. The KIDSCREEN-27 is a shorter version (27 items) of the original KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire (Ravens-Sieberer et al. (2007).
- 8.
The WHO Quality of Life-BREF instrument (WHOQOL) was used to ascertain the non-imprisoned parent/carer’s health-related quality of life as well as their aspirations, using a 26-item questionnaire. For more on the WHOQOL-BREF, see Skevington et al. (2004).
- 9.
In Sweden, a higher proportion of interviewed parents were entitled to temporary release/home leave, so this may account for the lower prison visiting rate.
- 10.
Note that participants in the study were almost exclusively recruited during prison visits and through NGOs working with prisoners’ families, which almost certainly affected the sample.
- 11.
Romania has four levels of security in the prison system: maximum security, closed, semi-open and open.
- 12.
There are guards outside the room, however.
- 13.
Since 1947 his work has inspired the UN and WHO crime prevention and health programmes for children (Redo and Platzer 2013).
References
Action for Prisoners’ Families, CLINKS, Prison Advice and Care Trust and Prison Reform Trust (2007), Parliamentary briefing: The children & families of prisoners: recommendations for practice.
Arditti, J. A., & Few, A. L. (2006). Mothers’ reentry into family life following incarceration. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(1), 103–123.
Barnardos. (2014a). On the outside: identifying and supporting children with a parent in prison. Ilford: Barnardos.
Barnardos (2014b). Children affected by parental imprisonment. http://www.barnardos.org.uk/what_we_do/our_projects/children_of_prisoners.htm. Accessed 4 June 2014.
Becroft, A.J. (2006). Youth Offending: Factors that Contribute and how the System Responds. Delivered at Symposium Child and Youth Offenders: What Works. http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/youth/publications-and-media/speeches/youth-offending-factors-that-contribute-and-how-the-system-responds. Accessed 4 June 2014.
Bocknek, E. L., Sanderson, J., & Britner, P. A. (2009). Ambiguous loss and posttraumatic stress in school-age children of prisoners. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 323–333.
Boswell, G., & Wedge, P. (2002). Imprisoned fathers and their children. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.
Bowlby, J. (1973a). Attachment and loss Vol 2: Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973b). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
Brown, K., Dibb, L., Shenton, F., & Elson, N. (2001). No one’s ever asked me: Young people with a prisoner in the family. London: Federation of Prisoners’ Families Support Groups.
Clarke, L., O’Brien, M., Day, R. D., Godwin, H., Connolly, J., Hemmings, J., et al. (2005). Fathering behind bars in English prisons: Imprisoned fathers’ identity and contact with their children. Fathering, 3(3), 221–241.
Dallaire, D. H., Ciconne, A., & Wilson, L. (2010). Teachers’ experiences with and expectations of children with incarcerated parents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 281–290.
DeHart, D., & Altshuler, S. (2009). Violence exposure among children of incarcerated mothers. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 26(5), 467–479.
George, S.M., & LaLonde, R.J. (2002). Incarcerated mothers in Illinois State Prisons: An analysis of administrative data. Unpublished.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.
Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. (1998). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 7, 125–130.
Hagan, K. A., & Myers, B. J. (2003). The effect of secrecy and social support on behavioural problems in children of incarcerated women. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(2), 229–242.
Hagan, K. A., Myers, B. J., & Mackintosh, V. H. (2005). Hope, social support and behavioral problems in at-risk children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(2), 211–219.
Hanlon, T. E., Blatchley, R. J., Bennett-Sears, T., O’Grady, K. E., Rose, M., & Callaman, J. M. (2005). Vulnerability of children of incarcerated addict mothers: Implications for preventive intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(1), 67–84.
Hissel, S., Bijleveld, C., & Kruttschnitt, C. (2011). The well-being of children of incarcerated mothers: An exploratory study for the Netherlands. European Journal of Criminology, 8(5), 346–360.
International Centre for Prison Studies (2014). World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/world-prison-brief. Accessed 17 April 2014.
Jones, A.D., & Wainaina-Woźna, A.E. (Eds.) (2013). Children of Prisoners. Interventions and mitigations to strengthen mental health. UK: University of Huddersfield. See also: http://www.coping-project.eu.
KIDSCREEN Group Europe. (2006). The KIDSCREEN questionnaires: Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Germany: Bielefeld University.
King, D. (2002). Parents, children and prison: Effects of parental imprisonment on children. Dublin Institute of Technology: Dublin.
Loper, A. B., Carlson, W., Levitt, L., & Scheffel, K. (2009). Parenting stress, alliance, child contact, and adjustment of imprisoned mothers and fathers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(6), 483–503.
Lösel, F., Pugh, G., Markson, L., Souza, K., & Lanskey, C. (2012). Risk and protective factors in the resettlement of imprisoned fathers with their families. Milton: Ormiston Children and Families Trust.
Mackintosh, V. H., Myers, B. J., & Kennon, S. S. (2006). Children of incarcerated mothers and their caregivers: Factors affecting the quality of their relationship. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15(5), 581–596.
May, C., Sharma, N., & Stewart, D. (2008). Factors linked to re-offending: a one-year follow-up of prisoners who took part in the Resettlement Surveys 2001, 2003 & 2004. Ministry of Justice Research Summary 5. London: Ministry of Justice.
Mortimer, R. (2010). Risk factors for offending: A developmental approach. Unpublished.
Mulready-Jones, A. (2011). Hidden children: A study into services for children of incarcerated parents in Sweden and the United States. London: Winston Churchill Memorial Trust.
Murray, J. (2005). The effects of imprisonment on families and children of prisoners. In S. Maruna & A. Leibling (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment. Devon: Willan Publishing.
Murray, J. (2007). The cycle of punishment: Social exclusion of prisoners and their children. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(1), 55–81.
Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2005). Parental imprisonment: effects on boys’ antisocial behaviour and delinquency through the life-course. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(12), 1269–1278.
Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Parental imprisonment: Long-lasting effects on boys’ internalizing problems through the life course. Development and Psychopathology, 20(1), 273–290.
Murray, J., Janson, C.-G., & Farrington, D. P. (2007). Crime in adult offspring of prisoners: A cross-national comparison of two longitudinal samples. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(1), 133–149.
Murray, J., Farrington, D.P., Sekol, I., & Olsen, R.F. (2009). Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behaviour and mental health: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews.
Nesmith, A., & Ruhland, E. (2008). Children of incarcerated parents: Challenges and resiliency, in their own words. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(10), 1119–1130.
Niven, S., & Stewart, D. (2005). Resettlement outcomes on release from prison in 2003. Home Office Findings 248.. London: Home Office.
Pew Charitable Trusts. (2010). Collateral Costs: Incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Washington, D.C.: Pew Charitable Trusts.
Phillips, S. D., & Dettlaff, A. J. (2009). More than parents in prison: The broader overlap between the criminal justice and child welfare systems. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(1), 3–22.
Poehlmann, J. (2005). Incarcerated mothers’ contact with children, perceived family relationships, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 350–357.
Prison Reform Trust. (2013). Bromley briefings prison factfile. London: Prison Reform Trust.
Pugh, G., & Lanskey, C. (2011). ‘Dads Inside and Out’: study of risk and protective factors in the resettlement of imprisoned fathers with their families. Conference paper for What’s new in Research and Evaluation? Informing our work with prisoners and offenders and their families. Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, 19 May 2011.
Ravens-Sieberer, U., Auquier, P., Erhart, M., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Bruil, J., et al. (2007). The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Quality of Life Research, 16(8), 1347–1356.
Redo, S., & Platzer, M. (2013). The United Nations Role in crime control and prevention: From “what?” to “how?”. In P. Reichel & J. Albanese (Eds.), Handbook of transnational crime and justice (2nd ed., pp. 283–302). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Roberts, S. (2012). The role of schools in supporting families affected by imprisonment. Families Outside: Edinburgh, Scotland.
Robertson, O. (2012). Collateral Convicts: Children of incarcerated parents: Recommendations and good practice from the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child Day of General Discussion 2011. Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva.
Robertson, O. (2007). The impact of parental imprisonment on children. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office.
Robertson, O., Sharratt, K., Pascaru, G., Bieganski, J., Kearney, H., Sommerland, N., Jones, A., Raikes, B., Urban, M., & Cheung, R. (2012). Stakeholder Perspectives on the Needs of Children of Prisoners in Europe, Analele Ştiinţifice Ale Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Din Iaşi (Serie Nouă), 2012 (2).
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schlafer, R. J., & Poehlmann, J. (2010). Attachment and caregiving relationships in families affected by parental incarceration. Attachment and Human Development, 12(4), 395–415.
Sharratt, K. (2014). Children’s experiences of contact with imprisoned parents: A comparison between four European countries. European Journal of Criminology, 11(6), 760–775.
Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.
Smith, R., Grimshaw, R., Romeo, R., & Knapp, M. (2007). Poverty and disadvantage amongst prisoners families. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Social Exclusion Unit. (2002). Reducing re-offending by ex-prisoners. London: Social Exclusion Unit.
Trice, A. D., & Brewster, J. (2004). The effects of maternal incarceration on adolescent children. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 19(1), 27–35.
Tudball, N. (2000). Doing it hard: A study of the needs of children and families in Victoria. Melbourne, Victoria: VACRO.
van de Rakt, M., Murray, J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012). The long-term effects of paternal imprisonment on criminal trajectories of children. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(12), 81–108.
Wildeman, C., Schnittker, J., & Turney, K. (2012). Despair by association? The mental health of mothers with children by recently incarcerated fathers. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 216–243.
Williams, K., Papadopoulou, V., & Booth, N. (2012). Prisoners childhood and family backgrounds: Results from the Surveying Prisoner Crime Reduction (SPCR) longitudinal cohort study of prisoners. Ministry of Justice Research Series 4/12. Ministry of Justice: London.
World Bank (2014). GDP per capita, PPP (current international $). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD. Accessed 4 June 2014.
World Health Organization. (2004). The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robertson, O. et al. (2016). Children of Prisoners: Their Situation and Role in Long-Term Crime Prevention. In: Kury, H., Redo, S., Shea, E. (eds) Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28424-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28424-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28423-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28424-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)