Skip to main content

Children of Prisoners: Their Situation and Role in Long-Term Crime Prevention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration

Abstract

Studies suggest that maintaining family ties can help reduce the likelihood of reoffending, and that while parental imprisonment can increase a child’s likelihood to offend, positive responses to the situation can aid the children’s well-being, attitude and attainment. Drawing on findings from the EU-funded COPING Project on the mental health of children of prisoners, this chapter explores the factors that aid a child’s ability to cope with parental imprisonment and the actions that different stakeholders can take to support them. It identifies some of the mental health impacts at different stages of parental imprisonment, the roles played by non-imprisoned parents/carers and by schools, and suggests options for further clarifying the factors that help and hinder children of prisoners in the short and long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and the United Nations Children’s Fund are among the key global intergovernmental actors who deal with children in conflict with the law and children as victims and witnesses of crime.

  2. 2.

    One example is the finding from the COPING study (see below) that children are as affected by a father’s imprisonment as by a mother’s, which went against previous findings that a mother’s imprisonment had more severe effects (due at least in part to the greater likelihood for imprisoned mothers to be raising children on their own, meaning that children would be more likely to change carer and possibly home and school, as well as losing their parent). However, the COPING researchers speculated that this may be due to the cohort of children that participated, almost all of whom were in contact with their imprisoned parent and who were taken to visit by their non-imprisoned parent or carer.

  3. 3.

    This is due both to the widespread non-recognition of this group by authorities and that children and parents may hide their status due to stigma or fears about the actions authorities may take upon discovery.

  4. 4.

    The number is significantly higher than the prison population because many parents, like other prisoners, serve less than a year.

  5. 5.

    SDQ scores refer to Goodman’s (1997) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, which is a behavioural screening instrument eliciting children and young peoples’ perceptions of their conduct, concentration, emotions and social relationships. The SDQ incorporates five different subscales (hyperactivity; emotional symptoms; conduct problems; peer problems; and a prosocial scale) which, when summed, provide a total difficulties score (TDS). It is generally agreed that the SDQ instrument provides one means to measure a child’s mental health.

  6. 6.

    The Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (SES) was devised by Morris Rosenberg (1965) and provides an indication of children and young people's perceived levels of self-esteem (self-evaluation). The scale consists of ten items which are summed to produce an overall score ranging from 10 to 40, where higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Self-esteem is one aspect of a child's well-being and influences aspirations, personal goals and interaction with others.

  7. 7.

    The KIDSCREEN instrument elicits children and young peoples’ ratings of their health and well-being. This is a self-report instrument and covers five dimensions (physical well-being; psychological well-being; autonomy and parental relation; support and peers; and school environment) with a higher score indicating more positive health and well-being. The KIDSCREEN-27 is a shorter version (27 items) of the original KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire (Ravens-Sieberer et al. (2007).

  8. 8.

    The WHO Quality of Life-BREF instrument (WHOQOL) was used to ascertain the non-imprisoned parent/carer’s health-related quality of life as well as their aspirations, using a 26-item questionnaire. For more on the WHOQOL-BREF, see Skevington et al. (2004).

  9. 9.

    In Sweden, a higher proportion of interviewed parents were entitled to temporary release/home leave, so this may account for the lower prison visiting rate.

  10. 10.

    Note that participants in the study were almost exclusively recruited during prison visits and through NGOs working with prisoners’ families, which almost certainly affected the sample.

  11. 11.

    Romania has four levels of security in the prison system: maximum security, closed, semi-open and open.

  12. 12.

    There are guards outside the room, however.

  13. 13.

    Since 1947 his work has inspired the UN and WHO crime prevention and health programmes for children (Redo and Platzer 2013).

References

  • Action for Prisoners’ Families, CLINKS, Prison Advice and Care Trust and Prison Reform Trust (2007), Parliamentary briefing: The children & families of prisoners: recommendations for practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J. A., & Few, A. L. (2006). Mothers’ reentry into family life following incarceration. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(1), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnardos. (2014a). On the outside: identifying and supporting children with a parent in prison. Ilford: Barnardos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnardos (2014b). Children affected by parental imprisonment. http://www.barnardos.org.uk/what_we_do/our_projects/children_of_prisoners.htm. Accessed 4 June 2014.

  • Becroft, A.J. (2006). Youth Offending: Factors that Contribute and how the System Responds. Delivered at Symposium Child and Youth Offenders: What Works. http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/youth/publications-and-media/speeches/youth-offending-factors-that-contribute-and-how-the-system-responds. Accessed 4 June 2014.

  • Bocknek, E. L., Sanderson, J., & Britner, P. A. (2009). Ambiguous loss and posttraumatic stress in school-age children of prisoners. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, G., & Wedge, P. (2002). Imprisoned fathers and their children. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973a). Attachment and loss Vol 2: Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973b). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., Dibb, L., Shenton, F., & Elson, N. (2001). No one’s ever asked me: Young people with a prisoner in the family. London: Federation of Prisoners’ Families Support Groups.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L., O’Brien, M., Day, R. D., Godwin, H., Connolly, J., Hemmings, J., et al. (2005). Fathering behind bars in English prisons: Imprisoned fathers’ identity and contact with their children. Fathering, 3(3), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallaire, D. H., Ciconne, A., & Wilson, L. (2010). Teachers’ experiences with and expectations of children with incarcerated parents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeHart, D., & Altshuler, S. (2009). Violence exposure among children of incarcerated mothers. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 26(5), 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, S.M., & LaLonde, R.J. (2002). Incarcerated mothers in Illinois State Prisons: An analysis of administrative data. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. (1998). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 7, 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, K. A., & Myers, B. J. (2003). The effect of secrecy and social support on behavioural problems in children of incarcerated women. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(2), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, K. A., Myers, B. J., & Mackintosh, V. H. (2005). Hope, social support and behavioral problems in at-risk children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(2), 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, T. E., Blatchley, R. J., Bennett-Sears, T., O’Grady, K. E., Rose, M., & Callaman, J. M. (2005). Vulnerability of children of incarcerated addict mothers: Implications for preventive intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hissel, S., Bijleveld, C., & Kruttschnitt, C. (2011). The well-being of children of incarcerated mothers: An exploratory study for the Netherlands. European Journal of Criminology, 8(5), 346–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Prison Studies (2014). World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/world-prison-brief. Accessed 17 April 2014.

  • Jones, A.D., & Wainaina-Woźna, A.E. (Eds.) (2013). Children of Prisoners. Interventions and mitigations to strengthen mental health. UK: University of Huddersfield. See also: http://www.coping-project.eu.

  • KIDSCREEN Group Europe. (2006). The KIDSCREEN questionnaires: Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Germany: Bielefeld University.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (2002). Parents, children and prison: Effects of parental imprisonment on children. Dublin Institute of Technology: Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loper, A. B., Carlson, W., Levitt, L., & Scheffel, K. (2009). Parenting stress, alliance, child contact, and adjustment of imprisoned mothers and fathers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(6), 483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lösel, F., Pugh, G., Markson, L., Souza, K., & Lanskey, C. (2012). Risk and protective factors in the resettlement of imprisoned fathers with their families. Milton: Ormiston Children and Families Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, V. H., Myers, B. J., & Kennon, S. S. (2006). Children of incarcerated mothers and their caregivers: Factors affecting the quality of their relationship. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15(5), 581–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C., Sharma, N., & Stewart, D. (2008). Factors linked to re-offending: a one-year follow-up of prisoners who took part in the Resettlement Surveys 2001, 2003 & 2004. Ministry of Justice Research Summary 5. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, R. (2010). Risk factors for offending: A developmental approach. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulready-Jones, A. (2011). Hidden children: A study into services for children of incarcerated parents in Sweden and the United States. London: Winston Churchill Memorial Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. (2005). The effects of imprisonment on families and children of prisoners. In S. Maruna & A. Leibling (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. (2007). The cycle of punishment: Social exclusion of prisoners and their children. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2005). Parental imprisonment: effects on boys’ antisocial behaviour and delinquency through the life-course. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(12), 1269–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Parental imprisonment: Long-lasting effects on boys’ internalizing problems through the life course. Development and Psychopathology, 20(1), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., Janson, C.-G., & Farrington, D. P. (2007). Crime in adult offspring of prisoners: A cross-national comparison of two longitudinal samples. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(1), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., Farrington, D.P., Sekol, I., & Olsen, R.F. (2009). Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behaviour and mental health: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesmith, A., & Ruhland, E. (2008). Children of incarcerated parents: Challenges and resiliency, in their own words. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(10), 1119–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, S., & Stewart, D. (2005). Resettlement outcomes on release from prison in 2003. Home Office Findings 248.. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Charitable Trusts. (2010). Collateral Costs: Incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Washington, D.C.: Pew Charitable Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. D., & Dettlaff, A. J. (2009). More than parents in prison: The broader overlap between the criminal justice and child welfare systems. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehlmann, J. (2005). Incarcerated mothers’ contact with children, perceived family relationships, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 350–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust. (2013). Bromley briefings prison factfile. London: Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, G., & Lanskey, C. (2011). ‘Dads Inside and Out’: study of risk and protective factors in the resettlement of imprisoned fathers with their families. Conference paper for What’s new in Research and Evaluation? Informing our work with prisoners and offenders and their families. Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, 19 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer, U., Auquier, P., Erhart, M., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Bruil, J., et al. (2007). The KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Quality of Life Research, 16(8), 1347–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redo, S., & Platzer, M. (2013). The United Nations Role in crime control and prevention: From “what?” to “how?”. In P. Reichel & J. Albanese (Eds.), Handbook of transnational crime and justice (2nd ed., pp. 283–302). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (2012). The role of schools in supporting families affected by imprisonment. Families Outside: Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, O. (2012). Collateral Convicts: Children of incarcerated parents: Recommendations and good practice from the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child Day of General Discussion 2011. Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, O. (2007). The impact of parental imprisonment on children. Geneva: Quaker United Nations Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, O., Sharratt, K., Pascaru, G., Bieganski, J., Kearney, H., Sommerland, N., Jones, A., Raikes, B., Urban, M., & Cheung, R. (2012). Stakeholder Perspectives on the Needs of Children of Prisoners in Europe, Analele Ştiinţifice Ale Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Din Iaşi (Serie Nouă), 2012 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlafer, R. J., & Poehlmann, J. (2010). Attachment and caregiving relationships in families affected by parental incarceration. Attachment and Human Development, 12(4), 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharratt, K. (2014). Children’s experiences of contact with imprisoned parents: A comparison between four European countries. European Journal of Criminology, 11(6), 760–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Grimshaw, R., Romeo, R., & Knapp, M. (2007). Poverty and disadvantage amongst prisoners families. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit. (2002). Reducing re-offending by ex-prisoners. London: Social Exclusion Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trice, A. D., & Brewster, J. (2004). The effects of maternal incarceration on adolescent children. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 19(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudball, N. (2000). Doing it hard: A study of the needs of children and families in Victoria. Melbourne, Victoria: VACRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Rakt, M., Murray, J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2012). The long-term effects of paternal imprisonment on criminal trajectories of children. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(12), 81–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman, C., Schnittker, J., & Turney, K. (2012). Despair by association? The mental health of mothers with children by recently incarcerated fathers. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 216–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., Papadopoulou, V., & Booth, N. (2012). Prisoners childhood and family backgrounds: Results from the Surveying Prisoner Crime Reduction (SPCR) longitudinal cohort study of prisoners. Ministry of Justice Research Series 4/12. Ministry of Justice: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014). GDP per capita, PPP (current international $). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD. Accessed 4 June 2014.

  • World Health Organization. (2004). The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Robertson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robertson, O. et al. (2016). Children of Prisoners: Their Situation and Role in Long-Term Crime Prevention. In: Kury, H., Redo, S., Shea, E. (eds) Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28424-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28424-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28423-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28424-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics