Abstract
Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas are aberrant intracranial vascular lesions involving a direct connection between dural arteries on the arterial side and dural sinuses and/or cortical veins on the venous side. DAVFs are classified based on the pattern of venous outflow and the presence of cortical venous reflux (Borden types 1ā3 or Cognard types IāV). High-quality imaging with MRI and digital subtraction angiography are crucial to decipher the grade and dynamic flow characteristics of DAVFs. This will subsequently guide the most appropriate next steps in the management of the patient, whether observation or treatment. The treatment modalities for DAVF obliteration are traditionally discussed in terms of three main categories: endovascular, microsurgical, and radiosurgical. Yet it is paramount to recognize that such an approach has the tendency to compartmentalize management, while in reality, patients with DAVF are best served by a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach. Successful DAVF obliteration and follow-up care is ensured with proper patient selection and strategic use of transarterial or transvenous embolization, microsurgery, and/or radiosurgery either alone or in various combinations. This chapter addresses these important issues in diagnosis, grading, patient selection, and treatment of cranial DAVFs.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Introduction
Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are abnormal vascular malformations of the cranial dura that involve direct connections between meningeal arteries draining into veins adjacent to dural venous sinuses. Their etiology remains unknown, though dural fistulas are known to occur after venous sinus thrombosis and trauma. Microsurgical, radiosurgical, and interventional approaches all play critical roles in dural fistula management. These modalities can be used in isolation or in tandem depending on a number of factors including location, anatomy of the fistula, and the feasibility of both arterial and venous access to the nidus and draining vein(s). Observation may be appropriate for select dural fistula when they are low grade and not affecting quality of life. Careful assessment of clinical symptoms, the physical exam, noninvasive imaging, and a thorough cranial angiogram are the bedrock of safe and effective patient management. This chapter is augmented with a compendium of interesting illustrative case examples of DAVFs that have been managed by the senior author and clearly illustrates the concept of a multimodal management strategy.
Epidemiology
The rate of detection of dural arteriovenous fistulas has been increasing in parallel to the evolution of imaging modalities [1ā4]. Yearly population incidence rates for DAVFs are 0.15 per 100,000 individuals, but have been reported as high as 0.29 per 100,000 (Japan) to 0.51 per 100,000 (Finland) [3, 5, 6]. These lesions have a 1:1 male to female predilection and typically present during the fifth and sixth decades [1, 3]. The anatomic distribution of cranial dural fistulas varies widely as outlined in Table 19.1.
Clinical Presentation
The range and severity of symptoms depends on the location, hemodynamics, and venous drainage patterns of the dural AVFs [7]. Patients may present with a wide variety of symptoms ranging from mild to severe and even fatal [8ā11]. Symptoms are known to correlate to location. DAVFs related to the cavernous sinus typically manifest with ocular symptoms such as exophthalmos, visual disturbance, orbital pain or swelling, and ophthalmoplegia (Case 19.5) [1, 12, 13]. DAVFs related to the transverse-sigmoid junction can present with pulsatile tinnitus as they are contiguous to the auditory apparatus [12, 14]. DAVFs draining into the superior sagittal sinus or deep veins may manifest with symptoms of prolonged intracranial hypertension and venous congestion, such as hydrocephalus, seizures, and papilledema [1, 10, 14]. Fistulas involving the brainstem may present with cranial nerve involvement, motor weakness, or paralysis [15]. Rarely, fistulas may present with cognitive dysfunction and memory loss (Cases 19.1 and 19.4).
Diagnostic Approach and Imaging
The history, physical exam, and noninvasive imaging are all important for proper selection of patients for further workup with a diagnostic cerebral angiogram. MRA and CTA in patients who present with brain hemorrhage can show clues that point toward the diagnosis of dural fistula (Case 19.3). Fundamentally a cerebral angiogram remains the gold standard of diagnosis and the most helpful modality for treatment decision-making [3, 16ā18]. It is crucial to include both external carotid systems in the angiographic injection, in addition to the internal carotid and vertebral systems.
Grading
The first classification system for dural arteriovenous fistulas was proposed by Djindjian and Merland who analyzed angiographic findings in relation to hemorrhagic risk. Accordingly, they classified dural fistulas into grades IāIV (Table 19.2). Contemporary classification systems currently followed in clinical practice, however, are the Cognard and Borden classification systems [10, 19]. Borden classified DAVFs into three grades (IāIII) (Table 19.3), while Cognard classified the lesions into five grades (grade IāV) with three subtypes for class II DAVFs (IIa, IIb, and IIa+b) (Table 19.4) (Fig. 19.1). Based on the Cognard classification, the annual risk of hemorrhage from a type I or type IIA arteriovenous fistula is zero. Type II B is associated with an overall risk of 20ā%, whereas types III and IV are associated with an overall hemorrhage risk of 40ā% and 65ā%, respectively. In both classifications, type I and II fistulas drain into the venous sinuses, and type III into cortical veins. Additionally, in Cognardās classification, type IV fistulas drain into cortical veins and are associated with venous ectasia, and type V drain into perimedullary spinal veins (Fig. 19.1).
Carotid cavernous sinus fistulas (CCFs) are classified separately using the Barrow classification system (Table 19.5). The typical āduralā CCFs are types BāD. Type A is a direct carotid to cavernous sinus fistula that typically presents acutely with aggressive symptomatology [21].
Natural History and Clinical Course
In the absence of cortical venous reflux (CVR), DAVFs typically present as incidental findings or with signs and symptoms of increased dural venous drainage (bruit, tinnitus) [1, 12, 13, 22]. In a study of 68 patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas and no cortical venous drainage [23], none of the patients had neurological deficits and only 1 (1ā%) developed intracranial hemorrhage during a mean follow-up period of 27.9 months. Furthermore, among 50 patients who underwent angiography at follow-up, only 2 (4ā%) patients developed cortical venous drainage [23]. Studies tend to indicate that dural fistulas without cortical venous drainage typically follow a benign natural history [24, 25].
In the presence of cortical venous reflux, however, patients with DAVFs are at an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage or nonhemorrhagic neurological deficits. A study by van Dijk et al. [23] included 20 patients with DAVFs and cortical venous drainage who were treated partially or followed conservatively for a mean period of 4.3 years. 16 (80ā%) patients developed intracranial hemorrhage or neurological deficits. The calculated annual risks for intracranial hemorrhage and neurological deficits were 8.1ā% and 6.9ā%, respectively [23]. In a meta-analysis conducted by Awad et al. on 360 tentorial DAVFs, 31 of 32 (96ā%) patients with cortical venous drainage developed hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic neurological sequelae. Other studies have also shown an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and neurological deficits for patients who have venous varices and anomalies involving the deep venous system [1, 24, 26, 27].
Treatment
Patient Selection for Treatment
The key decision in DAVF management is to identify patients who need treatment. The presence of cortical venous reflux (Borden types II, III; Cognard types II b, II a+b, III, IV, and V) is a potentially concerning feature and should lead to strong consideration of treatment [28ā34]. Careful consideration should be given not to attribute an unrelated hemorrhage or progressive neurological symptoms to a low-grade fistula (Borden and Cognard types I). High-grade fistulas that present with hemorrhage are invariably selected for treatment to obliterate the fistula [30]. The importance of a thorough, unhurried clinical encounter with a patient cannot be overemphasized; unilateral pulsatile tinnitus with a low-grade fistula that is interfering with quality of life is a potential indication for treatment. Observation is a valid strategy for DAVFs that are low grade, but conversion of a low-grade fistula to a high-grade one while on observation can occur at an annual rate of about 1ā% [35]. Hence periodic surveillance with MR imaging is warranted in patients who are being observed [36ā39].
Formulating a Treatment Strategy
Once a decision is made to treat a DAVF, the goals and methods of treatment should be formulated by careful analysis of all imaging with special emphasis on the angiogram. However, visualizing the fistula is only one component of this analysis. Important questions that should be considered are:
-
1.
The location of the fistula: certain locations favor endovascular therapy while others favor microsurgical treatment.
-
2.
The anatomy of arterial and venous access from both microsurgical and interventional perspectives.
-
3.
The relationship of feeding arteries to cranial nerves and potential extracranial to intracranial collateral.
-
4.
The relationship of normal venous drainage to the arterialized sinus or arterialized cortical veins (drainage can be mixed).
-
5.
What is the safest and easiest way to eliminate CVR?
-
6.
Can the benign anatomic features of the fistula be treated safely and easily?
Endovascular Management
Advances in endovascular surgery and approaches over the past two decades have allowed for an increasing proportion of dural fistulas to be effectively treated with this approach (Case 19.2). Several embolic materials have been used for successful DAVF occlusion: NBCA (n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue) (Codman Neuro, Raynham, MA), Onyx (ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer) (ev3 Endovascular Inc., Plymouth, MN), and coils. Our preferred agent for most embolizations is Onyx for a number of reasons: First, Onyx possesses cohesive properties, as opposed to the adhesive character of NBCA, which allows for more controlled and prolonged injections [40, 41]. Second, Onyx allows for the possibility of precise, controlled injections, including stopping intermittently for short durations. Careful analysis of the angiogram can define the potential safety and success rate of both transvenous and transarterial approaches. Transarterial approaches can be quite straightforward if access can be achieved close to the nidus via a meningeal artery branch that is not in close proximity to cranial nerves. When cranial nerve proximity or potential extracranial to intracranial collaterals are at stake, then transvenous approaches may be preferable. When considering occlusion of venous structures, however, careful attention should be given to assure lack of normal venous drainage to those structures (mixed drainage). Adjuncts to transarterial Onyx may be required in technically challenging circumstances such as high-flow fistulas, in which the liquid material may quickly gain access and occlude the venous side or cause pulmonary embolism. This may take the form of balloon or coil assistance (flow control techniques) [41, 42]. Balloon- or coil-assisted Onyx embolization can potentially utilize a transarterial or transvenous route for either the balloon or coil and then employ Onyx through either route in various combinations [42, 43]. Novel dural lumen catheters have been used successfully [44, 45].
In some instances, an occluded sinus may be navigated using a microcatheter [41]. The transvenous route is by far most reliably used in management of type BāD CCFs. For non-CCFs, it has been primarily employed for TS-SS DAVFs (because anatomically they tend to have various routes for a transvenous approach) [46]. On the other hand, some DAVFs located at the tentorial incisura or anterior cranial fossa may not have accessible venous routes. Problems with transvenous occlusion include propagating venous thrombosis [47].
Obliteration rates with Onyx embolization are in the 68ā92ā% range [40, 48ā50]. However, DAVFs that show complete obliteration on immediate postprocedure angiography have been demonstrated to occasionally recanalize or regrow on follow-up [50, 51].
Recanalization rates of around 10ā% have been reported [52]. This reinforces the necessity of continued follow-up. It has been suggested that a short-term angiographic follow-up may be more predictive of long-term occlusion than relying on the immediate posttreatment angiogram [51].
Complications of cranial nerve paresis include those in the cavernous sinus (3ā6) and the posterior fossa cranial nerves 7 and 9ā12 with tentorial and TS-SS DAVFs and are described to occur in about 8ā% of cases in most contemporary series [41, 53]. Mechanical complications such as catheter adherence and breakage are known to occur but do not necessarily translate into clinically significant problems.
Microsurgical Management
Despite the vast majority of DAVFs being treated with endovascular means, select circumstances in Borden types 2 and 3 (with CVR) lesions mandate open surgical approaches. Such cases include instances where embolization was not performed due to difficult access, critical anastomoses, or the presence of arterial feeders with critical normal supply. An example of the latter is ethmoidal DAVFs with ophthalmic artery supply, which present an increased risk of vision impairment with transarterial embolization (Case 19.4). Microsurgery is also considered when embolization is not possible and angiography shows persistent filling [54]. Based on location, tentorial DAVFs are noted to have multiple tortuous arterial feeders that supply several cranial nerves along with less accessible transvenous routes. These factors make microsurgical management for these treacherous lesions an important option [55].
Current surgical techniques are vastly different from the traditional extensive resections in the pre-embolization/early embolization era [56, 57]. Contemporary surgical strategies may take the form of interruption of the draining vein close to the fistula using image guidance, surgical excision of the involved sinus, or direct sinus packing of a nonfunctional sinus. Hybrid approaches may involve burr hole placement to access an arterialized sinus with catheter-based occlusion then delivered endovascularly [58ā60]. As a āhybridā procedure, direct surgical access of the superior ophthalmic vein, a cortical vein, the vein of Galen, or the middle meningeal artery to deliver embolic material can be employed (Case 19.3) [61ā63]. Some authors make a distinction between DAVFs with CVR that drain directly into the leptomeningeal vein (non-sinus type) and ones that occur via drainage into a venous sinus (sinus type) [64]. Non-sinus-type lesions are approached with interruption of the vein close to the dura, by clipping or by coagulation, and then sectioning without tackling the arterial feeders. The sinus-type lesions can be dealt with by sinus occlusion. An important caveat for a surgical approach is recognizing that the initial scalp, bony, and dural openings may be excessively bloody due to extensive external carotid arterial feeders. Preoperative embolization can ameliorate this issue [31]. Various technical adjuncts for surgery include frameless stereotaxy, intraoperative angiography or ICG videoangiography, and intraoperative Doppler ultrasound [39].
Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has a delayed obliteration effect on dural fistulas. While this latency period may be tolerated for benign fistulas, the high annual hemorrhage rate for fistulas with CVR makes radiosurgery problematic as a first-line therapy [30, 33, 34]. SRS is, hence, chosen as a modality in situations where the lesion is not amenable to safe endovascular/microsurgical methods of obliteration or in a patient with severe medical comorbidities. Benign residual fistula after treatment can also be targeted with SRS to potentially reduce recurrence risk or eliminate residual pulsatile tinnitus. In case of low-flow/low-risk DAVFs such as CCF types BāD or Borden type 1, SRS may have more applicability, especially to treat a postembolization residual lesion [60]. The most common radiosurgery platform used is the Gamma Knife; however, any platform may be used for treatment delivery. The radiosurgical target is the nidus which typically is located in the wall of the dural venous sinus. The dose depends on the lesion size and location and ranges from 14 to 25 Gy [65]. A recent meta-analysis of SRS for DAVFs reported a complete obliteration rate of 68.2ā% over an overall mean follow-up period of 28.9 months [66]. Following SRS, there is an overall risk of hemorrhage that is in the range of 1.2ā1.6ā% [66, 67] over follow-up periods ranging from 2 to 11.4 years. This risk persists till complete obliteration and is higher in patients with CVR.
Cases
Case 19.1
High-Grade Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Simulating a Bilateral Thalamic Neoplasm
Summary: A 51-year-old male presented with bilateral thalamic lesions causing cognitive dysfunction. MRI demonstrated bilateral enhancing thalamic lesions with minimal mass effect (Fig. 19.2). Angiography revealed a thalamic DAVF supplied by bilateral middle meningeal arteries, marginal tentorial arteries from both ICAs, and a posterior meningeal artery from the left vertebral artery (Fig. 19.3). Transarterial endovascular embolization of the fistula was performed via both middle meningeal arteries using Onyx 18. Post-op angiography revealed complete resolution of the fistula (Fig. 19.4). Patient returned to his cognitive base-line 3 weeks after treatment.
Case 19.2
Reversal of Diffusion Restriction After Embolization of Dural Arteriovenous Fistula
Summary: A 54-year-old male patient presents with a 5-day history of confusion and mental status changes. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated gyral swelling and sulcal effacement associated with a small subcortical parenchymal hemorrhage in the left parietal region. MRI that was then performed demonstrated a broad zone of T2/FLAIR hyperintensity and restricted diffusion (Fig. 19.5). Cerebral angiogram revealed a Cognard type III left lateral tentorial DAVF with cortical venous drainage, resulting in significant left parieto-temporo-occipital venous hypertension (Fig. 19.6). The DAVF was treated by occluding the fistulous nidus endovascularly using Onyx 18. Postoperative cerebral angiography demonstrated complete obliteration with normalization of the venous drainage (Fig. 19.7). Follow-up MRI examination performed 4 weeks after the embolization revealed resolution of the previously seen area of restricted diffusion (Fig. 19.8). The patient was neurologically intact and seizure-free upon follow-up.
Case 19.3
Combined Surgical and Endovascular Access of the Superficial Middle Cerebral Vein to Occlude a High-Grade Cavernous Dural Arteriovenous Fistula
Link: http://links.lww.com/NEU/A393
Summary: A 75-year-old female patient presented with 3-month history of left retro-orbital headaches, 1 week of intermittent vertical and horizontal diplopia, and a few days of worsening slurred speech and RUE weakness. Computed tomography head scan without contrast demonstrated an acute left temporal lobe hemorrhage (Fig. 19.9a). Subsequent, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) studies of the head revealed dilated cortical veins in the left sylvian fissure (Fig. 19.9b). Cerebral digital subtraction angiography revealed the presence of a high-grade left CS-DAVF supplied by the bilateral external carotid branches as well as the left ICA feeders (Fig. 19.10a). Drainage from the left CS was solely through the left SMCV into engorged perisylvian cortical veins without involvement of the right CS (Fig. 19.10b). Venous access to the lesion was determined to be challenging. Subsequently, transarterial embolization was attempted and was unsuccessful due to migration of Onyx into the intraorbital left lacrimal artery. Following this, we elected to perform a left orbitozygomatic craniotomy to provide exposure to the anterior left middle cranial fossa for direct access to the SMCV (Fig. 19.11a). The left SMCV was then punctured with a 21-gauge micropuncture needle (Fig. 19.11b). The microcatheter was navigated over a microguidewire into the CS under fluoroscopic guidance (Figs. 19.12 and 19.13a). 19 detachable coils were then deployed resulting in the complete occlusion of the fistula (Fig. 19.13). Postoperative angiogram 1 week later confirmed complete obliteration of the fistula. At 6 months follow-up, patient had no neurological deficits and no cognitive dysfunction.
Case 19.4
Microsurgical Treatment of an Ethmoidal Dural Fistula: Three-Dimensional Illustration
A 74-year-old male patient presents with memory loss. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a left high-grade ethmoidal fistula. CTA demonstrated a large vessel emanating from the anterior left skull base with its vein connecting to the superior sagittal vein anteriorly (Fig. 19.14a). Cerebral angiogram revealed the fistulaās supply to be from the branches of the ethmoidal artery and meningeal branches of the internal maxillary artery (Fig. 19.14b). The draining on the other hand is through the superior sagittal vein anteriorly. An open procedure was elected due to the risk of ophthalmic artery occlusion via endovascular treatment of ethmoidal fistulas. Subsequently, a bifrontal craniotomy was performed and occlusion of fistula was successfully executed (Fig. 19.15, Video Link 1). Postoperative angiogram revealed complete resolution of the fistula. On 1 month follow-up, patient had no neurological deficits and was able to fully resume his daily activities
Video Link 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU5nQfv1BM4
Case 19.5
Summary: A 52-year-old female patient presents with bilateral proptosis and orbital chemosis. Angiography demonstrates bilateral mirror image Barrow type B cavernous sinus fistulas. The fistulas were draining through an ectatic superior ophthalmic vein with focal venous stenosis (Fig. 19.16). A transvenous approach was elected due to the presence of single draining veins from each side accessible through a transvenous approach. Coil-assisted Onyx embolization was carried out on both sides over two procedures with successful obliteration of the fistulas (Figs. 19.17, 19.18, and 19.19). The patient had complete symptom resolution.
Conclusions
A comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with DAVF is essential to guide best management practices. The decision of whether to observe or treat a fistula should be based on a detailed analysis of clinical and angiographic parameters of the DAVF. These include the presentation, location, and grade of the fistula. Accordingly, if it is decided to pursue treatment, the physician must create and implement an individualized plan based on three types of treatment modalities: endovascular embolization, microsurgery, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Each modality has certain specific strengths and limitations as described in the chapter. It is however fallacious to view the above three options in isolation or mutual exclusion. The ideal approach is an integrative multimodal management strategy that ensures the safety and efficiency of permanent occlusion of cranial dural fistulas.
References
Chaichana KL, Coon AL, Tamargo RJ, Huang J. Dural arteriovenous fistulas: epidemiology and clinical presentation. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2012;23(1):7ā13.
Newton TH, Cronqvist S. Involvement of dural arteries in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Radiology. 1969;93(5):1071ā8.
Piippo A, Niemela M, van Popta J, Kangasniemi M, Rinne J, Jaaskelainen JE, Hernesniemi J. Characteristics and long-term outcome of 251 patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas in a defined population. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(5):923ā34.
Zipfel GJ, Shah MN, Refai D, Dacey Jr RG, Derdeyn CP. Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: modification of angiographic classification scales based on new natural history data. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;26(5):E14.
Brown Jr RD, Wiebers DO, Torner JC, OāFallon WM. Incidence and prevalence of intracranial vascular malformations in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1965 to 1992. Neurology. 1996;46(4):949ā52.
Satomi J, Satoh K. Epidemiology and etiology of dural arteriovenous fistula. Brain Nerve. 2008;60(8):883ā6.
Hacein-Bey L, Konstas AA, Pile-Spellman J. Natural history, current concepts, classification, factors impacting endovascular therapy, and pathophysiology of cerebral and spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;121:64ā75.
Awad IA, Little JR, Akrawi WP, Ahl J. Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: factors predisposing to an aggressive neurological course. J Neurosurg. 1990;72(6):839ā50.
Brown R, Wiebers D, Nichols D. Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations-a clinical, radiologic, and long-term follow-up-study. Stroke, Amer Heart Assoc 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231-4596. 1992.
Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L, Bailly A-L, Houdart E, Casasco A, Chiras J, Merland J-J. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology. 1995;194(3):671ā80.
Lasjaunias P, Chiu M, Ter Brugge K, Tolia A, Hurth M, Bernstein M. Neurological manifestations of intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986;64(5):724ā30.
Davies MA, Ter Brugge K, Willinsky R, Wallace MC. The natural history and management of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae. Part 2: aggressive lesions. Interv Neuroradiol. 1997;3(4):303ā11.
Kim MS, Han DH, Kwon OK, Oh CW, Han MH. Clinical characteristics of dural arteriovenous fistula. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas. 2002;9(2):147ā55.
Cognard C, Casasco A, Toevi M, Houdart E, Chiras J, Merland JJ. Dural arteriovenous fistulas as a cause of intracranial hypertension due to impairment of cranial venous outflow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;65(3):308ā16.
Lagares A, Perez-Nunez A, Alday R, Ramos A, Campollo J, Lobato RD. Dural arteriovenous fistula presenting as brainstem ischaemia. Acta Neurochir. 2007;149(9):965ā7; discussion 967.
Brown RD, Flemming KD, Meyer FB, Cloft HJ, Pollock BE, Link MJ. Natural history, evaluation, and management of intracranial vascular malformations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:269ā81. Elsevier.
Houser O, Campbell J, Campbell R, Sundt Jr T. Arteriovenous malformation affecting the transverse dural venous sinus ā an acquired lesion. Mayo Clin Proc. 1979;54:651ā61.
McCormick W. āPathology of vascular malformations of the brainā. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1984. p. 44ā63.
Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA. A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg. 1995;82(2):166ā79.
Bendok BR, Naidech AM, Walker MT, Batjer HH. Hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. New York: Thieme; 2012.
Barrow DL, Spector RH, Braun IF, Landman JA, Tindall SC, Tindall GT. Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg. 1985;62(2):248ā56.
Hashiguchi A, Mimata C, Ichimura H, Morioka M, Kuratsu J. Venous aneurysm development associated with a dural arteriovenous fistula of the anterior cranial fossa with devastating hemorrhage ā case report. Neurol Med Chir. 2007;47(2):70ā3.
van Dijk JM, terBrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC. Clinical course of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with long-term persistent cortical venous reflux. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2002;33(5):1233ā6.
Brown Jr RD, Wiebers DO, Nichols DA. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: angiographic predictors of intracranial hemorrhage and clinical outcome in nonsurgical patients. J Neurosurg. 1994;81(4):531ā8.
Satomi J, van Dijk JM, Terbrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC. Benign cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: outcome of conservative management based on the natural history of the lesion. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(4):767ā70.
Bulters DO, Mathad N, Culliford D, Millar J, Sparrow OC. The natural history of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulae with cortical venous refluxāthe significance of venous ectasia. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(2):312ā9.
Willinsky R, Goyal M, terBrugge K, Montanera W. Tortuous, engorged pial veins in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: correlations with presentation, location, and MR findings in 122 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20(6):1031ā6.
Davies M, Saleh J, Ter Brugge K, Willinsky R, Wallace M. The natural history and management of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae. Part 1: benign lesions. Interv Neuroradiol J Peritherapeutic Neuroradiol Surg Proced Relat Neurosci. 1997;3(4):295ā302.
Davies MA, TerBrugge K, Willinsky R, Coyne T, Saleh J, Wallace MC. The validity of classification for the clinical presentation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(5):830ā7.
Gross BA, Du R. The natural history of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(3):594ā603.
Kakarla UK, Deshmukh VR, Zabramski JM, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, Spetzler RF. Surgical treatment of high-risk intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: clinical outcomes and avoidance of complications. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):447ā59.
Maimon S, Nossek E, Strauss I, Blumenthal D, Frolov V, Ram Z. Transarterial treatment with Onyx of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula with cortical drainage in 17 patients. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(11):2180ā4.
Sƶderman M, Pavic L, Edner G, Holmin S, Andersson T. Natural history of dural arteriovenous shunts. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1735ā9.
Strom RG, Botros JA, Refai D, Moran CJ, Cross III DT, Chicoine MR, Grubb Jr RL, Rich KM, Dacey Jr RG, Derdeyn CP. Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: asymptomatic cortical venous drainage portends less aggressive clinical course. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(2):241ā8.
Shah MN, Botros JA, Pilgram TK, Moran CJ, Cross 3rd DT, Chicoine MR, Rich KM, Dacey Jr RG, Derdeyn CP, Zipfel GJ. Borden-Shucart type I dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical course including risk of conversion to higher-grade fistulas. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(3):539ā45.
Iryo Y, Hirai T, Kai Y, Nakamura M, Shigematsu Y, Kitajima M, Azuma M, Komi M, Morita K, Yamashita Y. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with 3-T four-dimensional MR angiography using arterial spin labeling. Radiology. 2013;271(1):193ā9.
Jabbour P, Tjoumakaris S, Chalouhi N, Randazzo C, Gonzalez LF, Dumont A, Rosenwasser R. Endovascular treatment of cerebral dural and pial arteriovenous fistulas. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2013;23(4):625ā36.
Jang J, Schmitt P, Kim B-Y, Choi HS, Jung S-L, Ahn K-J, Kim I, Paek M, Kim B-S. Non-contrast-enhanced 4D MR angiography with STAR spin labeling and variable flip angle sampling: a feasibility study for the assessment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistula. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(4):305ā14.
Youssef PP, Schuette AJ, Cawley CM, Barrow DL. Advances in surgical approaches to dural fistulas. Neurosurgery. 2014;74:S32ā41.
Hu YC, Newman CB, Dashti SR, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG. Cranial dural arteriovenous fistula: transarterial Onyx embolization experience and technical nuances. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;3(1):5ā13.
VanLandingham M, Fox B, Hoit D, Elijovich L, Arthur AS. Endovascular treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery. 2014;74:S42ā9.
Shi Z.-S, Loh Y, Gonzalez N, Tateshima S, Feng L, Jahan R, Duckwiler G, ViƱuela F. Flow control techniques for Onyx embolization of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae. J Neurointerv Surg Neurintsurg. 2013;5(4):311ā6.
Huo X, Li Y, Jiang C, Wu Z. Balloon-assisted endovascular treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(5):658ā63.
Chiu AHY, Aw G, Wenderoth JD. Double-lumen arterial balloon catheter technique for Onyx embolization of dural arteriovenous fistulas: initial experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(5):400ā3.
Jagadeesan BD, Grigoryan M, Hassan AE, Grande AW, Tummala RP. Endovascular balloon-assisted embolization of intracranial and cervical arteriovenous malformations using dual-lumen coaxial balloon microcatheters and Onyx: initial experience. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:ons238ā43.
Kirsch M, Liebig T, KĆ¼hne D, Henkes H. Endovascular management of dural arteriovenous fistulas of the transverse and sigmoid sinus in 150 patients. Neuroradiology. 2009;51(7):477ā83.
Gonzalez LF, Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Teufack S, Albuquerque FC, Spetzler RF. Rapid and progressive venous thrombosis after occlusion of high-flow arteriovenous fistula. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(6):e359ā65.
Cognard C, Januel A, Silva N, Tall P. Endovascular treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous drainage: new management using Onyx. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(2):235ā41.
Nogueira R, Dabus G, Rabinov J, Eskey C, Ogilvy C, Hirsch J, Pryor J. Preliminary experience with onyx embolization for the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(1):91ā7.
Rangel-Castilla L, Barber SM, Klucznik R, Diaz O. Mid- and long-term outcomes of dural arteriovenous fistula endovascular management with Onyx. Experience of a single tertiary center. J Neurointerv Surg Neurintsurg. 2014;6(8):607ā13.
Chandra R, Leslie-Mazwi T, Mehta B, Yoo A, Rabinov J, Pryor J, Hirsch J, Nogueira R. Transarterial Onyx embolization of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: long-term follow-up. Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(9):1793ā7.
Adamczyk P, Amar AP, Mack WJ, Larsen DW. Recurrence of ācuredā dural arteriovenous fistulas after Onyx embolization. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;32(5):E12.
Macdonald JHM, Millar JS, Barker C. Endovascular treatment of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: a single-centre, 14-year experience and the impact of Onyx on local practice. Neuroradiology. 2010;52(5):387ā95.
Gross BA, Du R. Surgical treatment of high grade dural arteriovenous fistulae. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(11):1527ā32.
Lawton MT, Sanchez-Mejia RO, Pham D, Tan J, Halbach VV. Tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulae: operative strategies and microsurgical results for six types. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(3):110ā25.
Sundt Jr TM, Piepgras DG. The surgical approach to arteriovenous malformations of the lateral and sigmoid dural sinuses. J Neurosurg. 1983;59(1):32ā9.
Tomak PR, Cloft HJ, Kaga A, Cawley CM, Dion J, Barrow DL. Evolution of the management of tentorial dural arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2003;52(4):750ā62.
Al-Mahfoudh R, Kirollos R, Mitchell P, Lee M, Nahser H, Javadpour M. Surgical disconnection of cortical venous reflux for high grade intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. World Neurosurg. 2014;83:652ā6.
Ghobrial GM, Marchan E, Nair AK, Dumont AS, Tjoumakaris SI, Gonzalez LF, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour P. Dural arteriovenous fistulas: a review of the literature and a presentation of a single institutionās experience. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(1ā2):94ā102.
Natarajan SK, Ghodke B, Kim LJ, Hallam DK, Britz GW, Sekhar LN. Multimodality treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas in the Onyx era: a single center experience. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(4):365ā79.
Chalouhi N, Dumont AS, Tjoumakaris S, Gonzalez LF, Bilyk JR, Randazzo C, Hasan D, Dalyai RT, Rosenwasser R, Jabbour P. The superior ophthalmic vein approach for the treatment of carotid-cavernous fistulas: a novel technique using Onyx. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;32(5):E13.
Chaudhary N, Lownie SP, BussiĆØre M, Pelz DM, Nicolle D. Transcortical venous approach for direct embolization of a cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:onsE343ā8.
Houdart E, Saint-Maurice J-P, Chapot R, Ditchfield A, Blanquet A, Lot G, Merland J-J. Transcranial approach for venous embolization of dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(2):280ā6.
Wachter D, Hans F, Psychogios M-N, Knauth M, Rohde V. Microsurgery can cure most intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae of the sinus and non-sinus type. Neurosurg Rev. 2011;34(3):337ā45.
Pan DH, Lee CC, Wu HM, Chung WY, Yang HC, Lin CJ. Gamma knife radiosurgery for the management of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013;116:113ā9.
Chen C-J, Lee C-C, Ding D, Starke RM, Chivukula S, Yen C.-P, Moosa S, Xu Z, Pan DH.-C, Sheehan J. P. Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: a systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(2):353ā62.
Gross BA, Du R. The natural history of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(3):594ā602; discussion 602-3.
Sugrue PA, Hurley MC, Bendok BR, Surdell DL, Gottardi-Littell N, Futterer SF, Muro K, Batjer HH. High-grade dural arteriovenous fistula simulating a bilateral thalamic neoplasm. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009;111(7):629ā32. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 May 31.
Dabus G, Bernstein RA, Hurley MC, Shaibani A, Bendok BR, Russell EJ. Reversal of diffusion restriction after embolization of dural arteriovenous fistula: case report. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(4):E1147ā51. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181edadee; discussion E1151.
Hurley MC, Rahme RJ, Fishman AJ, Batjer HH, Bendok BR. Combined surgical and endovascular access of the superficial middle cerebral vein to occlude a high-grade cavernous dural arteriovenous fistula: case report. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(2):E475ā81. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182192478; discussion E481ā2.
Aoun SG, Shafizadeh SF, Bendok BR. Microsurgical treatment of an ethmoidal dural fistula: 3-dimensional illustration. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(1 Suppl Operative):3. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318260518a.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aoun, R.J.N. et al. (2016). Cranial Dural AV Fistulas: Making Sense of Who to Treat and How. In: Veznedaroglu, E. (eds) Controversies in Vascular Neurosurgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27315-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27315-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27313-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27315-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)