Abstract
Since its inception during the early 1980s, electrotransfection has likely become the most widely employed technique to transform bacteria that are not naturally competent. Electrotransformation has been applied to virtually all families of culturable bacteria and has contributed to and enhanced the development of molecular tools to achieve genetic tractability. Electrotransformation of non-pathogenic, laboratory Escherichia coli strains is the focus of this chapter’s discussion because, in all likelihood, they are the most widely electroporated bacteria; thereby facilitating comparisons and highlighting contrasts. A few recently reported improvements of and amendments to E. coli electrotransformation protocols are presented, electroporation parameters optimization discussed, and a few select, representative families of electrotransformed eubacteria examined. For the sake of focus, electroporation is addressed in the context of bacterial transformation exclusively not withstanding recent development of an assortment of applications. In spite of technical improvements, innovative applications, and utilization of the technique over a growing range of bacterial species, much remains to be learned and understood regarding the mechanisms involved in pore formation and macromolecule translocation mediated by electric pulse into prokaryotes, among other reasons addressed here, because of bacterial cell envelopes’ considerable structural diversity and complexity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aune TE, Aachmann FL (2010) Methodologies to increase the transformation efficiencies and the range of bacteria that can be transformed. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1301–1313
Bach E, Fernandes GDC, Passaglia LMP (2016) How to transform a recalcitrant Paenibacillus strain: from culture medium to restriction barrier. J Microbiol Methods 131:135–143
Calvin NM, Hanawalt PC (1988) High-efficiency transformation of bacterial cells by electroporation. J Bacteriol 170(6):2796–2801
Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(12):6640–6645
Dower WJ, Miller JF, Ragsdale CW (1988) High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res 16(13):6127–6145
Dunny GM, Lee LN, LeBlanc DJ (1991) Improved electroporation and cloning vector system for gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 57(4):1194–1201
Frischer ME, Thurmond JM, Paul JH (1990) Natural plasmid transformation in a high-frequency-of-transformation marine Vibrio strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(11):3439–3444
Gonzales MF, Brooks T, Pukatzki SU, Provenzano D (2013) Rapid protocol for preparation of electrocompetent Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae. J Vis Exp 8(80):e50684
Griffith F (1928) The significance of Pneumococcal types. J Hyg 27(2):113–159
Hamashima H, Nakano T, Tamura S, Arai T (1990) Genetic transformation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus, and Vibrio cholerae non O-1 with plasmid DNA by electroporation. Microbiol Immunol 34(8):703–708
Hanahan D (1983) Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166:557–580
Klevanskaa K, Bier N, Stingl K, Strauch E, Hertwig S (2014) PVv3, a new shuttle vector for gene expression in Vibrio vulnificus. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(4):1477–1481
Koprowski H 2nd, Levine MM, Anderson RJ, Losonsky G, Pizza M, Barry EM (2000) Attenuated Shigella flexneri 2a vaccine strain CVD 1204 expressing colonization factor antigen I and mutant heat-labile enterotoxin of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 68(9):4884–4892
Lee DJ, Bingle LE, Heurlier K, Pallen MJ, Penn CW, Busby SJ, Hobman JL (2009) Gene doctoring: a method for recombineering in laboratory and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. BMC Microbiol 9:252
Lo Scrudato M, Blokesch M (2012) The regulatory network of natural competence and transformation of Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet 8(6):e1002778
Lukjancenko O, Wassenaar TM, Ussery DW (2010) Comparison of 61 sequenced Escherichia coli genomes. Microb Ecol 60(4):708–720
Mandel M, Higa A (1970) Calcium-dependent bacteriophage DNA infection. J Mol Biol 53(1):159–162
Miller JF (1994) Bacterial transformation by electroporation. Methods Enzymol 235:375–385
Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1(7):841–845
Nováková J, Izsáková A, Grivalský T, Ottmann C, Farkašovský C (2014) Improved method for high-efficiency electrotransformation of Escherichia coli with the large BAC plasmids. Folia Microbiol 59:53–61
O’Callaghan D, Charbit A (1990) High efficiency transformation of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi by electroporation. Mol Gen Genet 223(1):156–158
Ohse M, Takahashi K, Kadowaki Y, Kusaoke H (1995) Effects of plasmid DNA sizes and several other factors on transformation of Bacillus subtilis ISW1214 with plasmid DNA by electroporation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59(8):1433–1437
Peng D, Luo Y, Guo S, Zeng H, Ju S, Yu Z, Sun M (2009) Elaboration of an electroporation protocol for large plasmids and wild-type strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. J Appl Microbiol 106(6):1849–1858
Porter ME, Dorman CJ (1997) Virulence gene deletion frequency is increased in Shigella flexneri following conjugation, transduction, and transformation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 47(1):163–172
Schumann W (2007) Production of recombinant proteins in Bacillus subtilis. Adv Appl Microbiol 62:137–189
Sheng Y, Mancino V, Birren B (1995) Transformation of Escherichia coli with large DNA molecules by electroporation. Nucleic Acid Res 23(11):1990–1996
Shivarova N, Förster W, Jacob HE, Grigorova R (1983) Microbiological implications of electric field effects VII. Stimulation of plasmid transformation of Bacillus cereus protoplasts by electric field pulses. J Basic Microbiol 23(9):595–599
Trevors JT (1990) Electroporation and expression of plasmid pBR322 in Klebsiella aerogenes NCTC 418 and plasmid pRK2501 in Pseudomonas putida CYM 318. J Basic Microbiol 30(1):57–61
Tu Q, Yin J, Fu J, Herrmann J, Li Y, Yin Y, Stewart AF, Müller R, Zhang Y (2016) Room temperature electrocompetent bacterial cells improve DNA transformation and recombineering efficiency. Sci Rep 6:24648
Turgeon N, Laflamme C, Ho J, Duchaine C (2006) Elaboration of an electroporation protocol for Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579. J Microbiol Methods 67(3):543–548
Wang H, Griffiths MW (2009) Mg2+-free buffer elevates transformation efficiency of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by electroporation. Lett Appl Microbiol 48(3):349–354
Xie TD, Sun L, Zhao HG, Fuchs HG, Tsong TY (1992) Study effects of DNA topology on cell uptake and transfection efficiency. Biophys J 63:1026–1031
Acknowledgments
DP was supported by National Institutes of Health grants MD001091-01 and GM068855-02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Provenzano, D., Trevino, V., Ermolinsky, B. (2018). Bacterial Electrotransformation: An Interface Between Technology and Art. In: Miklavcic, D. (eds) Handbook of Electroporation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26779-1_73-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26779-1_73-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26779-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26779-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences