Abstract
With the increasing interests in ram accelerators [5] throughout the world, the Shock Wave Research Center (SWRC), Institute of Fluid Science (IFS), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, decided to construct their own ram accelerator. Research results are presented in this section.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Background
With the increasing interests in ram accelerators [5] throughout the world, the Shock Wave Research Center (SWRC), Institute of Fluid Science (IFS), Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, decided to construct their own ram accelerator. With limited resources, at first the bore diameter was determined from existing unused tubes made of stainless steel. The name ‘RAMAC25’ came from its bore diameter as was done in other institutes. The first publication appeared as an institute internal report in 1996 [7]. Even before installing RAMAC25 and also thereafter, SWRC received valuable support from the group of University of Washington through researcher exchanges by Abe Hertzberg, Adam P. Bruckner, Carl Knowlen, realized by the funds from Ministry of Education, Japan, via their technical advice and collaboration projects.
Using RAMAC25, we conducted experimental examination of its propulsion performance, obtaining a muzzle speed of a projectile of 2.3 km/s and a world-highest acceleration averaged over the ram acceleration section of 4 × 105 m/s2 by using an ‘open-base’ projectile. Also, the building-up processes of a high-temperature slug in the transition region to the ram acceleration section were visualized.
2 Apparatus
The schematic illustration of RAMAC25 in its final configuration is shown in Fig. 1 [3, 10]. A powder gun (Fig. 2) was used as the pre-launcher to the ram acceleration section, where the projectile was accelerated to a maximum velocity of 1.3 km/s. Smokeless power (NY500, Nippon Oil and Fats Cooperation) was used as the pre-launcher propellant. In the pre-launcher, the projectile was backed by a perforated obturator, which in turn was backed by a back plate that plugged the perforation [1, 7, 8]. The obturator assists the initiation of the ram acceleration by moderately compressing and heating the mixture on the entry to the ram acceleration section. Before the ram acceleration section, the burnt gas of the smokeless powder was vented through ventilation holes fabricated along the acceleration tube of the prelauncher.
The ram acceleration section consists of a 0.6-m-long entrance tube followed by five 1.2-m-long tubes. The inner diameter of the ram acceleration tubes is 25 mm. The instrumentation units, composed of a pickup coil and a piezoelectric pressure transducer, were placed with a separation distance of 0.3 m. When the projectile passage is sensed using the pick-up coils, the projectile velocity is determined by the method of time-of-flight. There is a projectile catcher in the dump tank.
Figure 3 schematically illustrates the conventional-type projectile used in RAMAC25. It comprises two pieces, a nose and an after-body, which are hollowed and threaded together. The projectile is made of the magnesium alloy and weighs 18.5 g.
3 Visualization of Starting Processes
Since RAMAC25 was the world-smallest-circular-bore ram accelerator, the effect of finite-rate chemical reactions under a modest fill pressure could lead to difficulties in igniting the propellant mixture. This problem was solved after careful investigation of the starting processes with optical visualization of a high-temperature slug built-up by repeated shock wave reflections [2, 9]. The visualization was done using an aspherical lens (Fig. 4, [9]) through which the in-tube flow image was radially magnified with a uniform magnification. The slug was built up before a projectile entered the ram acceleration section (Fig. 5). Then, during the transition, the propellant mixture was successfully ignited. Figure 5 shows high-speed framing photography of projectile entry process observed through the aspherical lens. The images are vertically magnified by a factor of 2.06. Frame interval; 10 μs. The initial pressure of the upstream (air), 240 Pa; downstream (N2), 0.8 MPa, single layer of 50-μm-thick Mylar diaphragm, projectile speed, 1120 m/s. A shock heated region is observed as an illuminating slug. This visualization was backed up by the pressure measurement, see Fig. 6 [9].
Using a holographic interferometer, the transition processes of the projectile entering the high-pressure section filled with inert gas are visualized in Figs. 7 and 8. Upon piercing of the Mylar diaphragm by the projectile conical nose, a conical shock wave is attached to the sharp nose. Then the shock wave repeats reflection between the acceleration tube and projectile walls. With this configuration, the pressure and the temperature of the gas around the conical nose are not excessively increased. Even if the gas on the right-hand side of the diaphragm was a propellant mixture, the ignition would be delayed and occur behind the projectile base. In this way, the ram acceleration can be successfully started.
4 High Acceleration Operation Using Open-Base Projectile
The small facility had the advantage to obtain a high acceleration owing to the square-cubic law; in principle the mass of a projectile scales with the cube of its dimension whereas the acceleration with an area that scales with its square. With this background, the high acceleration operation, which may not be relevant for tactical purposes, was investigated in RAMAC25.
Most projectiles used in ram accelerators have a centerbody, which is supported either by fins or rails. For the projectile to keep its integrity during the prelaunch with a high-acceleration level of the order of 104 g (gravitational acceleration) or higher, it was manufactured as a single piece. Moreover, for thermally-choked operation [1, 5, 6], the required entrance velocity is about 1.2 km/s, and the projectile experiences an acceleration level higher than 104 g also in the prelaunch processes. In order to obtain this high acceleration level, the mass of the projectile needs to be as small as possible. In order to reduce mass, the center-body of a projectile is often hollowed. Usually the hollow is machined by dividing a projectile into two pieces, a nose and an after-body. After machining a hollow in each piece, the two pieces are threaded together. In this way, the mass of the projectile is decreased. However, while the pressure outside of the center-body becomes 20 times as high as the fill pressure or even higher, the inside pressure remains unchanged. The projectile experiences a large compressive load from the outside. Table 1, Figs. 9 and 10 show the experimental conditions, the acceleration tube wall pressure histories and the projectile velocity profiles obtained with the conventional type projectile. In first and second stage, the propellant mixtures are 2.8CH4 + 2O2 + 5.7N2 and 4.6CH4 + 2O2 + 2He, respectively. The initial fill pressure is 3.5 MPa all through. In the third stage, except for the case of M CJ = 3.4, where M CJ denotes the Chapman-Jouguet detonation speed, unstart occur right after the transition and the projectile is decelerated right away.
Utilizing RAMAC 25, another type, that is an open-base projectile (Fig. 11, [4]), was also used to increase the acceleration with a limited operation pressure. They are made as a single piece, of aluminum alloy, A7075-T6. Since the base of the projectile center-body is hollow, pressure inside and outside the projectile is almost balanced. Its wall thickness could be significantly reduced. A thread to connect two center-body pieces is not necessary. The minimum body thickness is 1 mm. Four fins support the center-body. The mass is about 12 g. Table 2 contains the experimental conditions. The propellant mixture of the first and second stages are the same as those of the Table 1.
Figure 12 shows inner wall pressure histories measured during the passage of a projectile. A high pressure was maintained around the projectile after-body, corresponding to thermally choked operation.
Figure 13 shows projectile velocity histories measured with the open-base projectile. The operation has three stages. Various fuel mixture ratios are investigated in the third stage (4.8 m in length). Hereafter the ratio of a heat release from the combustion to the initial static enthalpy will be designated by Q. The entrance Mach number in the third stage, M 3, was varied from 3.1 to 3.5. For Q = 3.4, wave fall-off occurs right after entering the third stage. With Q = 4.2, ram acceleration lasted for the longest distance. However, the average acceleration was lower than that with Q = 4.6. With Q larger than this value, wave un-start occurs before reaching the achievable velocity. However, when M 3 was decreased from 3.5 to 3.2, the effective acceleration length increased, and a higher velocity was achieved. With this decreased value of M 3, not only the maximum velocity but also the maximum Mach number became higher. Although the lower M 3 operation was superior to that in the earlier mentioned acceleration performance, usually starting reliability was improved with increasing the entrance Mach number. The value of 3.2 for the entrance Mach number was close to this critical condition.
Operation of the system at M 3 = 3.2 yielded the highest performance: Through the 6.6-m-long, three-stage-ram-acceleration section, a velocity increment from 1.3 to 2.3 km/s and an average acceleration of 4 × 104 g was achieved.
5 Summary
The investigations of RAMAC25 were conducted with a global collaboration, exchange of personal, know-how, data and information. Using this world-smallest-circular-bore ram accelerator, understanding the initiation processes of ram acceleration was improved by the visualization of starting processes. Also, the high ram acceleration with a modest fill pressure was demonstrated using the open-base projectile.
References
Bruckner, A.P., Knowlen, C., Hertzberg, A., Bogdanoff, D.W.: Operational characteristics of the thermally choked ram accelerator. J. Propul. Power 7(5), 828–836 (1991)
Burnham, E.: Investigation of starting and ignition transients in the thermally choked ram accelerator. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington (1993)
Hamate, Y., Sasoh, A., Takayama, K.: Ram accelerator operations at acceleration level up to 6 × 104 g. J. Phys. IV 10(Pr11), 3–9 (2000)
Hamate, Y., Sasoh, A., Takayama, K.: High ram acceleration using open-base projectile. J. Propul. Power 19(2), 190–195 (2003)
Hertzberg, A., Bruckner, A.P., Bogdanoff, D.W.: Ram accelerator: a new chemical method for accelerating projectiles to ultrahigh velocities. AIAA J. 26(2), 195–203 (1988)
Knowlen, C., Sasoh, A.: Ram Accelerator Performance Modeling. Ram Accelerators, pp. 25–37. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Sasoh, A., Hirakata, S., Ujigawa, Y., Takayama, K.: RAMAC25, the ram accelerator at Shock Wave Research Center, Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University (in Japanese), pp. 161–190. Institute of Fluid Science Report, No. 7 (1996)
Sasoh, A., Hirakata, S., Maemura, J., Hamate, Y., Takayama, K.: Thermally Choked Operation in a 25-mm-Bore Ram Accelerator. Ram Accelerators, pp. 111–118. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Sasoh, A., Maemura, J., Hirakata, S., Takayama, K., Falcovitz, J.: Diaphragm rupture. Impingement by a conically-nosed, ram-accelerator projectile. Shock Waves 9, 19–30 (1999)
Sasoh, A., Hamate, Y., Takayama, K.: Small-bore ram accelerator operation. J. Propul. Power 17(3), 622–628 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sasoh, A. (2016). RAMAC25. In: Seiler, F., Igra, O. (eds) Hypervelocity Launchers. Shock Wave Science and Technology Reference Library, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26018-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26018-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26016-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26018-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)