Abstract
The use of natural antimicrobial compounds is receiving much attention and is becoming very frequent by the importance that nowadays is given to natural resources. Natural components have been applied in several sectors such as agriculture, biomedicine and food preservation. The development of resistance to conventional antibiotic by pathogenic bacteria makes necessary to find alternative antimicrobials to eradicate these microorganisms. Many food products are perishable and require protection from spoilage to improve quality and shelf life. Numerous efforts are conducted to find safe natural alternatives to prevent microorganism growth in plants and food products, because of the consumer concern regarding synthetic pesticides and preservatives. Natural antimicrobials can be obtained from different sources including plants, animals, bacteria, algae, and fungi. Among them, glucosinolates and their derived products have been recognized for their benefits to human nutrition, plant defense, and as potent antimicrobial agents. This chapter describes the antimicrobial activity of glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products against different bacterial and fungal species, as well as the mechanism of action of these active compounds.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In agreement with the current trend to value the natural and renewable resources, the interest in the use of natural antimicrobial compounds is increasing for biomedical, agricultural, and especially food applications [1, 2].
Food products are perishable by nature and can be subjected to contamination by bacteria and fungi . Many of these microorganisms can cause undesirable reactions that deteriorate flavor, odor, color, sensory, and textural properties of foods. Some of them can also potentially cause food-borne illness. For all these reasons, food products require protection from spoilage during their preparation, storage, and distribution to give them desired shelf life. Furthermore, the dramatic rise of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms is of concern and includes food-borne pathogens that are also more tolerant to several food processing and preservation methods. The consumer concern regarding synthetic products, such as food additives and pesticides, and the necessity to overcome the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens led to the research of alternative compounds with potent antimicrobial activity which can reduce the impact of synthetic products on human and animal health [1].
Natural antimicrobials can be obtained from different sources including plants, animals, bacteria, algae, and fungi. To select the appropriate biocidal product, the microorganism strain must be identified and the spectrum of antimicrobial activity of the compound considered [2–4]. Several reports have demonstrated the efficacy of plant-derived compounds, most of all in food applications. Antimicrobials derived from plants are mostly secondary metabolites that possess various benefits including antimicrobial properties against pathogenic and spoilage microbes. The structural diversity of plant-derived compounds is immense, and the impact of antimicrobial action they produce against microorganisms depends on their structural configuration [5].
Among the potent natural antimicrobials , glucosinolates (GLS) are an important class of secondary plant products found in seeds, roots, stems, and leaves of cruciferous plants including 16 families of dicotyledonous angiosperms, mainly Brassicaceae [6]. There are about 120 different GLS identified, derived from amino acids (alanine, leucine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan) and a number of chain-elongated homologues [7]. They are classified as aliphatic, aromatic, methylthioalkyl, and heterocyclic, which have a thioglucoside component in common structure and differ at their side chains [8].
Located within vacuoles, GLS are physically separated but accompanied by β-thioglucosidase enzymes known as myrosinases [9]. Following plant tissue disruption, the enzyme and GLS come into contact, which, in the presence of water, generates a hydrolysis forming an aglycone moiety, glucose, and sulfate. The aglycone moiety is unstable and rearranges to form three main groups of substances: nitriles, thiocyanates (TCs), and isothiocyanates (ITCs) (Fig. 1) [3, 10, 11].
GLS and their enzymatic hydrolysis products are responsible for a characteristic pungent flavor [12, 13]. These compounds have shown several biological activities including plant defense (against insects and microbial infections) and benefits to human health (anticarcinogenic, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties) and might be potential natural agents for food preservation [14]. Their response to microbial population varies according to their structural characteristics. The biocidal effect of cruciferous tissues on other microorganisms has been attributed mainly to volatile degradation products of GLS, released from their plants. Among derived products, ITCs are the major inhibitors of microbial activity, and they have been studied mainly for food preservation and plant pathogen control [5, 12]. ITCs are volatile substances that display an inhibitory effect on several microorganism species at low concentrations [15].
Therefore, the objective of this chapter was to present results of studies on antimicrobial activity of GLS and their enzymatically degradation products and highlight important aspects on the application.
2 Antibacterial Activity
GLS and, above all, their hydrolysis products elicit a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity against a variety of bacteria. The concentrations of these compounds required to inhibit microorganisms are difficult to compare given differences in methodologies, materials, and test strains employed. There are considerably more data for the ITCs, and in particular for AITC, than others GLS products. Furthermore, the mode of delivery to target microorganisms has a large impact on the antibacterial effect. Dissolution of these compounds in liquid media can result in a weak antimicrobial activity, while lower concentrations in the vapor phase are sufficient to inhibit microorganisms [10]. On Table 1 are summarized some studies which report the antibacterial potential of these compounds.
Horseradish vapors, containing GLS hydrolysis products, showed stronger antibacterial activities against several bacterial strains [16, 17]. Later, also studied and compared were the bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of AITC , EITC, and MITC against 10 strains. MITC was the most effective, in both solution and vapor phases, followed by AITC and EITC. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus appeared to be the more resistant strains, while the least resistant were Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus mycoides, and Serratia marcescens.
Virtanen [18] reported the antimicrobial activity of BITC and β-phenylethyl, m-methoxybenzyl, and methoxybenzyl ITCs against S. aureus. The activity of these ITCs was higher than the antimicrobial activity of a series of aliphatic ITCs. Zsolnai [19] demonstrated that the same concentration of AITC and PITC, used to severely inhibit the growth of yeasts and fungi, was not effective against Streptococcus pyogenes, S. aureus, and other Gram-negative bacteria. BITC was effective against Staphylococci but not on other bacteria.
Kanemaru and Miyamoto [20] studied the antibacterial activity of brown mustard and its major pungent compound, AITC, on the growth of E. coli 3301, S. aureus IFO 3761, Proteus vulgaris IFO 3851, Pseudomonas fragi IFO 3458, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa IFO 3755. To prepare the extract of black mustard extract was prepared as 20% mustard in ethanol (70%) after myrosinase treatment. AITC was also dissolved in 70% ethanol to form an equivalent concentration. The nutrient broth in which the bacteria were cultured contained the mustard extract or AITC and was stored at 30 °C on a shaker. Turbidimetry was used to determine bacterial growth. The results obtained evidenced that the antibacterial effect of mustard was mainly due to AITC. The concentrations of mustard in the medium that inhibited bacterial growth for 24 h were 0.138%, 0.104%, 0.064%, 0.043%, and 0.089% and those of AITC were 14.5, 12.3, 6.5, 3.6, and 7.2 ppm for S. aureus, E. coli, P. vulgaris, P. fragi, and P. aeruginosa, respectively. A bacteriostatic effect was shown by mustard on S. aureus and E. coli (0.8%), while the effect was bactericidal on P. aeruginosa at 0.2%
Shofran et al. [21] tested the antimicrobial activity of sinigrin and four sinigrin hydrolysis products, in broth culture, against different species of bacteria. Sinigrin is a GLS that, upon injury or mechanical disruption of plant tissue, is hydrolyzed by myrosinase producing up to four distinct compounds: AITC, allyl TC (ATC), allyl cyanide (AC), and 1-cyano-2,3-epithiopropane (CEPT). Sinigrin had little effect upon the growth of microorganisms [22], but its hydrolysis products were effective in inhibition of growth. The species of bacteria studied in the experiment were E. coli 33625, E. coli NC101, Pseudomonas fluorescens MD13, Aeromonas hydrophilia 7966, S. aureus 4220, B. subtilis IS75, Pediococcus pentosaceus FFL48, Leuconostoc mesenteroides FFL44, Lactobacillus brevis MD42, and Lactobacillus plantarum MOP3. Sinigrin, AC, and CETP at 1000 ppm did not show inhibitory effects against any of the bacteria tested. ATC was inhibitory to the growth of 3 strains of Gram-negative (E. coli 33625, E. coli NC101, P. fluorescens MD13) and 1 strain of Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus 4220) with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ranged between 200 and 400 ppm. The antimicrobial activity of ATC was due to its conversion to AITC, sinigrin hydrolysis products with the highest antibacterial activity. AITC was effective against all the bacteria tested, except L. plantarum MOP3. The MIC of AITC against Gram-negative and Gram-positive non-lactic acid bacteria ranged between 100 and 200 ppm, while lactic acid bacteria were more resistant with MIC between 500 and 1000 ppm. It should be highlighted that the antimicrobial activity of AITC can be different if it is used in gaseous form or dissolved in broth culture. Furthermore, a lot of factors can influence the generation of AITC from sinigrin.
Kyung and Fleming [23] tested sinigrin and its derivate products against 15 species of bacteria: Pediococcus pentosaceus LA3, P. pentosaceus LA76, L. mesenteroides LA10, L. mesenteroides LA113, L. plantarum LA97, L. plantarum LA70, L. brevis LA25, L. brevis LA200, Listeria monocytogenes B67, L. monocytogenes B70, S. aureus B31, E. coli B34, Enterobacter aerogenes B146, B. subtilis B96, and Salmonella typhimurium B38. Sinigrin itself was not antimicrobial because it did not inhibit growth up to 1000 ppm and microorganisms did not degrade it to its antimicrobial aglycones. AITC is known to be antimicrobial, and the MICs found ranged from 50 to 500 ppm for bacteria, including Gram-positive, Gram-negative, pathogenic, and lactic acid bacteria.
Delaquis and Sholberg [24] evaluate the microbistatic and microbicidal properties of gaseous AITC against bacterial cells of S. Typhimurium (ATCC 14028), L. monocytogenes (strain 81–861), E. coli O157:H7 (ATCC 43895), and Pseudomonas corrugata (isolated from lettuce). S. typhimurium, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli O157:H7 were inhibited when exposed to 1000 μg L−1 AITC. P. corrugata failed to grow in the presence of 500 μg L−1. Variations at different incubation temperatures were observed. Bactericidal activities varied with strain and increased with time of exposure. The most resistant bacterium was E. coli.
The antibacterial properties of the GLS and their hydrolysis products became of big interest and importance also in the eradication of pathogenic microorganisms that is complicated by the development of resistance to conventional antimicrobial agents. Helicobacter pylori is one of the most prevalent human pathogens in the world. Gastric infections with H. pylori are known to cause gastritis and peptic ulcers and dramatically enhance the risk of gastric cancer. Antibiotic therapy is recommended for infected patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers or gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, but this treatment is not universally successful. Even with the combination of two or more antibiotics, H. pylori is difficult to eradicate due to the development of resistance of this bacteria to these antibiotics and the persistence of organisms within gastric epithelial cells and, furthermore, due to logistic, sociologic, and economic reasons. The ITC sulforaphane (SFN) appears to overcome all of these problems. SFN is abundant in certain varieties of broccoli and broccoli sprouts in the form of its GLS precursor called glucoraphanin. It has been demonstrated that SFN is a potent bacteriostatic agent against 3 reference strains and 45 clinical isolates of H. pylori. The MIC for 90% of the strains is <4 μg mL−1, irrespective of their resistance to conventional antibiotics. It is a potent bactericidal agent against both extra- and intracellular H. pylori in vitro. Further, brief exposure to SFN eliminated intracellular H. pylori from a human epithelial cell line (HEp-2). Although higher concentrations are required to achieve bactericidal activity for the intracellular forms, SFN accumulates intracellularly to high levels, as its glutathione conjugate. It can be safely administered to humans because it is present in high concentrations in edible cruciferous vegetables and can be directly delivered to the stomach [25].
Haristoy et al. [26] evaluated the effect of SFN in vivo against H. pylori by using human gastric xenografts in nude mice. H. pylori was completely eradicated in 8 of the 11 SFN-treated grafts, after short-term administration of SFN at a dose that can be achieved in the human diet.
Haristoy et al. [27] analyzed the activities of 12 ITCs including sulforaphane on 25 strains of H. pylori using an agar dilution assay. The ITCs tested were iberin, cheirolin, erucin, D,L-SFN, D-SFN, L-SFN, L-sulforaphane, erysolin, berteroin, alyssin, hirsutin, PEITC , BITC, and 4-(α-L-rhamnopyranosyloxy)benzyl ITC. Furthermore, the bactericidal activities of the six ITCs (cheirolin, L-sulforaphane, erysolin, berteroin, hirsutin, and 4-(α-L-rhamnopyranosyloxy)benzyl ITC) that showed the lowest MICs were determined both directly and against intracellular bacteria in cultured human epithelial cells. The MIC90 values for these ITCs ranged between 4 and 32 μg mL−1. It has been demonstrated that, in addition to SFN, four (cheirolin, berteroin, hirsutin, and 4-(α-L-rhamnopyranosyloxy)benzyl ITC) of the most active compounds exhibited high bactericidal activity against both extra- and intracellular bacteria.
Ono et al. [28] screened, isolated, and identified antibacterial compounds occurring in some common foods for bactericidal use, against E. coli and S. aureus. Among the different foodstuffs studied, wasabi stems, banana fruits, coriander leaves, and mustard seeds showed antibacterial activity. In particular, the lower minimal bactericidal concentration was obtained for wasabi stems, so their activity was highest. The compound with the antibacterial activity was identified as the 6-methyl-sulfinylhexyl ITC. The ethyl, butyl, hexyl, and octyl homologues of this ITC were determined in some Cruciferae plants. The main component contained in wasabi was the hexyl homologue, whereas horseradish contained the ethyl and hexyl homologues. Broccoli, Chinese cabbage, radish, and turnip almost exclusively contained the butyl homologue, and cabbage contained only the hexyl homologue. These homologues were also active against E. coli and S. aureus with minimal bactericidal concentration ranged between 0.1 and 2.0 mg mL−1.
Liu and Yang [29] studied the stability and the antimicrobial activity of AITC in two medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) and soybean oil (SBO), dispersed in an oil-in-water system during long-term storage. It has been shown that the stability and antimicrobial activity were affected by the content, type, and oxidative stability of the oil. In particular, high oil content is favorable for AITC stability in the emulsion. AITC with MCT were more effective than AITC with SBO in inhibiting Gram-negative bacteria E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus and L. monocytogenes.
Luciano and Holley [30] evaluated the antibacterial activity of AITC against E. coli O157:H7 at different pH values and examined the inhibitory action of this compound against two enzymes important in the metabolism of this food-borne pathogen (thioredoxin reductase and acetate kinase). AITC showed greater antimicrobial activity at low pH values (4.5 and 5.5). Decomposition products of this ITC were also studied, and they did not show antibacterial activity toward E. coli O157:H7. Only AITC is antimicrobial in its original form. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that only 1 μL L−1 of AITC could decrease the activity of thioredoxin reductase and AITC at 10–100 μL L−1 was able to significantly inhibit both thioredoxin reductase and acetate kinase.
The antimicrobial properties of different GLS autolysis products of Hornungia petraea were investigated against two isolates of S. aureus, Salmonella enteritidis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Sarcina lutea, E. coli, Shigella sp., and Bacillus cereus. The tested compounds were showed to be active against all tested microorganisms, with the activity ranging from 1 to 1250 mg mL−1 for inhibitory and 1 to 5000 mg mL−1 for microbicidal activity. In particular, the assays showed a very high antibacterial activity of the tested ITCs against S. lutea [31].
Olaimat and Holley [32] determined the minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentrations of AITC from mustard against five strains each of Salmonella and L. monocytogenes individually and combined. The MIC and MBC values of AITC ranged from 60 to 100 ppm and 120 to 180 ppm, respectively, at 37 °C and ranged from 10 to 40 ppm and 200 to 600 ppm, respectively, at 21 °C against both pathogens. AITC had no antimicrobial activity at low temperatures (4 °C or 10 °C) and alkaline pH over 10, but at neutral pH, L. monocytogenes is reduced. At acidic pH, AITC was more effective against Salmonella. However, AITC was more effective at combinations of 21 °C and neutral pH against L. monocytogenes and at combinations of higher temperature and acidic pH against Salmonella.
A lot of data are available about the antimicrobial activity of ITCs, but the results are difficult to compare. Accordingly, Wilson et al. [33] studied the antibacterial activity of a large number of ITCs on a wide range of microorganisms, using for all the same experimental conditions. Ten ITCs were tested, and, among them, six were investigated for the first time: SFN, iberin, AITC, BITC, MITC, PITC, PEITC-, propyl-, 3-methylthiophenyl-, and 3-methylthiopropyl-ITC. The bacteria tested were fourteen and included 8 Gram-positive species (B. cereus CIP 78.3, B. subtilis ATCC 6633, Enterococcus faecalis G9h, Enterococcus faecium ATCC 19434, L. plantarum DSM 9843 [299v], L. monocytogenes LC 10, S. aureus ATCC 6538, and Staphylococcus xylosus LC 57) and 6 Gram-negative species (K. pneumoniae DSM 681, E. coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa DSM 1128, S. enteritidis LC 216, S. typhimurium LC 443, and S. marcescens LC 448). A turbidimeter was used to monitor the growth of bacteria, and the antimicrobial activity was expressed as antimicrobial efficacy index that is a function of the growth delay, the reduction in the maximum population, and the reduction in maximum specific growth rate. All the ITCs tested displayed antimicrobial activity, depending on the target bacteria and the structural features of the molecule considered. BITC showed the highest value of antimicrobial efficacy index, followed by PEITC. Different from other studies, AITC was the least active ITC, and not necessarily aromatic ITCs were more active than aliphatic compound. For example, 3-methylthiopropyl-ITC was much more active than PITC. Gram-negative bacteria were overall more sensitive to ITCs than Gram-positive bacteria, and considerable variations in sensitivity were evidenced between species even within the same Gram type.
AITC, BITC, and PEITC purified from cruciferous plants were evaluated against 15 isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolated from diabetic foot ulcer patients. In general, the AITC always presented the higher MIC values and thus lower antimicrobial activity, while BITC and PEITC presented the lowest MIC. Therefore, these ITCs showed the highest antimicrobial activity. The AITC and PEITC were essentially bacteriostatic, whereas BITC was bactericidal in 11 isolates of MRSA. Based on this, BITC is more effective in suppressing MRSA strains than PEITC. The antibacterial effectiveness of these compounds depends on the dose tested and on the chemical structure [34].
GLS and their derivate products are useful also in inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria that can contaminate vegetable seeds . This contamination can occur at any point, from the field to the sprouting process and during subsequent handling of sprouts until they are consumed. Populations of E. coli O157:H7 have been reported to reach 106–107 cfu g−1 of sprouts produced from contaminated seeds. E. coli O157:H7 causes life-threatening hemorrhagic colitis, hemolytic uremic syndrome, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the young, old, and immunocompromised. The efficacy of AITC in killing E. coli O157:H7 on dry and wet alfalfa seeds was investigated. AITC was lethal to E. coli inoculated onto agar disks, but, unfortunately, the enhanced effectiveness of AITC in killing the pathogen onto alfalfa seeds is offset by a dramatic reduction in seed viability. Nevertheless, the use of AITC for the purpose of killing E. coli O157:H7 in other fields and, perhaps, other pathogens on alfalfa seed holds promising [35].
GLS hydrolysis products also displayed antimicrobial activity against plant pathogenic microorganisms, and this feature reinforces the potential for using them as alternatives to the traditional chemical control of phytopathogenic bacteria . Aires et al. [36] evaluated the antibacterial effects of GLS hydrolysis products against six relevant plant pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, using a disc diffusion assay: Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Erwinia chrysanthemi, Pseudomonas cichorii, Pseudomonas tomato, Xanthomonas campestris, and Xanthomonas juglandis. The GLS hydrolysis products used in the in vitro assay were AITC, AC, SFN, BITC, benzyl cyanide (BC), PEITC, 2-phenylethyl cyanide (PEC), indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN), indole-3-carbinol (I3C), and ascorbigen (ASC). A mix of AITC, BITC, and PEITC also was tested. The strongest inhibitory effect was showed by PEITC and SFN. Among the different GLS hydrolysis products studied, the ITCs were more efficient than the other products, and the antimicrobial effects were dose-dependent.
A transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana that overexpressed p-hydroxybenzyl GLS was used to evaluate the capacity of GLS and their breakdown products to influence and modify the natural rhizosphere community. It was showed that the proteobacteria and also the fungal community in the rhizosphere of the transgenic plant were significantly affected. Modification of the GLS content of the plant could be an alternative to the use of pesticides [37].
Aires et al. [38] evaluated the antimicrobial activity of intact GLS and their hydrolysis products and microbial catabolites, against human pathogenic or gastrointestinal tract bacteria: the Gram-positive E. faecalis, S. aureus, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus and the Gram-negative Acinetobacter baumannii, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter hormaechei , E. coli (two strains), Hafnia alvei, Klebsiella oxytoca, K. pneumoniae, Morganella morganii, Proteus mirabilis, P. aeruginosa, S. typhi, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The intact GLS examined were sinigrin, glucoraphanin, glucotropaeolin, gluconasturtiin, and indole glucobrassicin, while the enzymatic hydrolysis products were AITC, SFN, BITC, PEITC, I3C, AC, BC, PEC, and 3,3′-di-indolylmethane (DIM). Allylamine (AAM), benzylamine (BAM), and 2-phenylethylamine (PAM), which are microbial metabolites of GLS, were also tested. Among the compounds tested, only ITCs were effective, but GLS, nitriles, and amines were ineffective at all the doses used. The highest activity was shown by SFN and BITC. IAN had some inhibitory activity against the Gram-negative bacteria. I3C had some inhibitory effects against the Gram-positive bacteria but had no effect, even at the highest dose, against the Gram-negative bacteria. The compound, the concentration used, and the microorganism tested influence the antimicrobial activity of the GLS hydrolysis products. Some of these were more effective than conventional antibiotics in inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microorganisms, such as ITCs. The data reported in this study demonstrate the potential for using these natural antimicrobials as an alternative or in combination with antibiotic-based therapies for treating infectious diseases.
Some ITCs display a synergy with conventional antibiotics. Tajima et al. [39] examined different hydroxy ITCs for antimicrobial synergism with various antibiotics against E. coli and S. aureus. It was demonstrated that 2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl ITC displayed antimicrobial synergism with aminoglycosides, such as streptomycin , against E. coli and S. aureus grown in glucose-containing medium. However, small changes in the concentrations of both ITC and streptomycin affect their combined action from synergism to suppression of antimicrobial activity. The mechanism of synergism and suppression remains unclear [40].
Palaniappan et al. [41] examined the synergistic interaction between natural antimicrobials and antibiotics to which the target bacteria were resistant. Among the agents studied, AITC was effective in reducing the MIC of erythromycin when tested against S. pyogenes.
The antibacterial effect in vitro of PEITC and its synergistic effect with antibiotics against different E. coli from human and animal were demonstrated by Freitas et al. [42].
Many of the older references about the antimicrobial properties of ITCs were often related to the use of these compounds as preservatives in foods. Tressler and Joslyn [43] suggested that the Romans added large quantities of mustard seed to crushed grape for preservative purposes. The use of mustard oils to fruit juices and wines has apparently been practiced for generations in some parts of the world. Kosker et al. [44] showed the possibility of using AITC as preservative in fresh apple cider at a concentration of 20 ppm. Furthermore, it was shown that the thermal resistance of Bacillus thermoacidurans can be greatly reduced using AITC 10 ppm in buffer and fruit juices. Kostova et al. [9] studied the use of AITC in the disinfection of eggs. It was reported that AITC could control the growth of microorganisms on the surface of goose and hen eggs by application of the solution or as vapor. This method was not pursued because the AITC was absorbed through the shell.
The major pungent component of black mustard (Brassica nigra) and brown mustard (B. juncea), which is the same as that of wasabi (Eutrema wasabi Maxim.), is AITC. The antimicrobial activity of brown mustard AITC vapor and the possibility of its use as modified atmosphere packing were studied by Isshiki et al. [45]. The bacteria used were B. subtilis IFO-13722, B. cereus IFO-13494, S. aureus IFO-12732, Staphylococcus epidermidis IFO-12993, E. coli JCM-1649, S. typhimurium A TCC-14028, S. enteritidis JCM-1891, V. parahaemolyticus IFO-12711, and P. aeruginosa IFO-13275. First, the antibacterial activity of AITC vapor, against each microorganism, was evaluated in Petri dishes, and then application experiments were carried out with different foods. AITC vapor inhibited the growth of all microorganisms examined in the experiments. In the application experiments, none of the tested samples were spoiled after 7 days, while the controls grew sufficiently after 2 days [45].
Ward et al. [46] evaluated the effectiveness of different concentrations of a volatile distillate extracted from fresh horseradish root against the growth of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria inoculated on agar and roast beef slices at 12 °C. The distillate was composed by about 90% AITC and 9% 2-phenethyl ITC, and the bacteria tested were S. aureus, E. coli O157:H7, S. typhimurium, L. monocytogenes, Serratia grimesii, and Lactobacillus sake. L. sake was the most resistant: 20000 nL distillate L−1 air were required to completely inhibit growth on agar. On the other side 4000 nL distillate L−1 air completely inhibited the growth of S. aureus, E. coli O157:H7, S. typhimurium, L. monocytogenes, and S. grimesii on agar for 7 days in aerobic storage at 12 °C. These bacteria were more resistant when inoculated on roast beef: 20,000 nL distillate L−1 were required to completely inhibit the growth, and L. sake was weakly inhibited at this concentration.
Delaquis et al. [47] determined the effect of vaporized horseradish essential oil (HEO) on microbial growth in precooked roast beef slices contaminated with Pseudomonas spp. and Enterobacteriaceae and lactic acid bacteria. The slices were stored 28 days at 4 ± 2 °C in air or 100% N2 with and without HEO. The results showed that 20 μL L−1 of HEO inhibited the growth of most spoilage bacteria and Pseudomonas spp. And Enterobacteriaceae were strongly inhibited than lactic acid bacteria that were more resistant. The chemical changes and sensory properties of precooked roast beef treated with HEO were also evaluated and revealed that the development of off-flavors and odors derived from fat oxidation products was delayed by HEO.
The bactericidal activity of AITC and MITC was tested on iceberg lettuce inoculated with a rifampicin-resistant strain of Salmonella Montevideo and streptomycin-resistant strains of E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes Scott A in sealed containers at 4 °C for 4 days. MITC was more active against L. monocytogenes than the other bacteria, while AITC showed stronger activity against E. coli O157:H7 and S. Montevideo. Furthermore in this study, the AITC was tested also on tomato stem scars and skin contaminated with S. Montevideo and on apple stem scars contaminated with E. coli O157:H7. S. Montevideo inoculated on tomato skin was more sensitive to AITC than that on stem scars. Treatment with vapor generated from 500 mL of AITC caused an 8-log reduction in bacteria on tomato skin but only a 5-log reduction on tomato stem scars. The bactericidal activity of AITC was weaker for E. coli O157:H7 on apple stem scars; only a 3-log reduction in bacteria occurred when 600 mL of AITC was used [48].
The incorporation of mustard flour (non-deheated) as an ingredient in packaged ground beef to inactivate E. coli O157:H7 was tested by Nadarajah et al. [49]. The results showed that it is possible to use mustard flour at levels of between 5 and 10% to eliminate E. coli O157:H7 from fresh ground beef . The sensory evaluation of cooked ground beef was carried out and showed that there were no significant differences between the overall sensory acceptability of ground beef formulated with 5% and 10% mustard [49].
Four sausage batters (17.59% beef, 60.67% pork, and 17.59% pork fat) were inoculated with P. pentosaceus and Staphylococcus carnosus and a five-strain cocktail of nonpathogenic variants of E. coli O157:H7. Microencapsulated AITC was added to three batters at 500, 750, or 1000 ppm to determine its antimicrobial effects. E. coli O157:H7 was reduced by 6.5 log10 CFU g−1 in sausages containing 750 and 1000 ppm AITC after 21 and 16 days of processing, respectively. E. coli O157:H7 numbers were reduced by 4.75 log10 CFU g−1 after 28 days of processing in treatments with 500 ppm AITC, and the organism was not recovered from this treatment beyond 40 days [50].
The antimicrobial activity of AITC against growth of typical spoilage bacteria (Lactobacillus algidus, L. mesenteroides, Leuconostoc carnosum, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum, Carnobacterium divergens, Brochothrix thermosphacta, Serratia proteamaculans) from marinated pork was also investigated in vacuum-packed pork meat. MICs for AITC were difficult to determine because of the absence of gastight barrier between the wells of a single plate used in the experiment. As AITC exerts antimicrobial activity in both liquid and gas phases, the addition of AITC to one well affected bacterial growth in adjacent wells. In fact, the addition of AITC completely inhibited the growth of S. proteamaculans and B. thermosphacta even in control wells containing no AITC. To determine the MIC for AITC in liquid phase, experiments with sealed wells would have to be carried out. The ability of AITC to exert antimicrobial effects in its gas phase even at low concentrations may make it more useful for applications in modified atmosphere-packaged foods [51].
AITC was also incorporated into chitosan coatings to develop an antimicrobial application against Salmonella that would improve the safety and extend shelf life of whole fresh cantaloupe. It has been demonstrated that with AITC concentrations increasing from 10 to 60 μL mL−1, the antibacterial effects of coating treatments against Salmonella increased, and no visual changes in overall appearance and color of cantaloupe rind and flesh due to coating treatments were observed [52].
AITC was encapsulated using gum Arabic and chitosan to overcome the problem of its high volatility to investigate the effect of microencapsulated AITC as a natural additive on the shelf life and quality of Kimchi, a traditional Korean fermented vegetable food. Encapsulated AITC addition to Kimchi resulted in positive changes in pH, titratable acidity, and microbial analysis compared to that of control. The number of Leuconostoc and Lactobacillus species in Kimchi decreased with an increase in the concentration of AITC. However, with regard to sensory analysis, AITC concentrations of 0.10% or lower are recommended for manufacturing Kimchi [53].
The antimicrobial effect of AITC entrapped in alpha and beta cyclodextrin inclusion complexes (IC) against different target organisms, among them Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes, was determined. AITC entrapped in beta IC exhibited a significantly better antimicrobial effect compared to unentrapped AITC. The antimicrobial effect of beta IC was determined during aerobic storage of packaged fresh-cut onions. This application of beta IC (200 mL L−1) to packaged fresh-cut onions effectively decreased numbers of L. monocytogenes [54]. ITCs are used in food active packaging to reduce, inhibit, or retard the growth of microorganisms on food products. White mustard essential oil (WMEO) showed antimicrobial activity against Salmonella recovered from inoculated frozen vegetables and chicken particulates. The antibacterial property was due to the production of 4-hydroxybenzyl ITC obtained by the hydrolysis of the GLS sinalbin, present in white mustard essential oil derived from white mustard seeds (Sinapis alba L.) [55].
AITC in combination with modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) was tested to control the growth of L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium on fresh chicken breasts during refrigerated storage for 21 days. On day 21, the microbial counts in the products packaged with AITC and MAP were lower than ambient air and MAP, even if AITC was less effective against L. monocytogenes than S. typhimurium. Furthermore, vapor AITC has been found to be more effective than liquid AITC [56], but its strong odor can limit its use in food systems. The use of AITC as a flavoring substance has been evaluated by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) and by the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (AFC). This report concluded that there were no safety concerns from AITC consumption at the estimated levels of intake [57].
3 Antifungal Activity
One of the first studies that demonstrated antifungal activity of cruciferous plant was carried out in the 1930s, when these authors demonstrated in vitro toxicity of volatile compounds (AITC, PITC, MITC , EITC , ethyl TC, allyl sulfide, ethyl sulfide, and sinigrin) toward certain fungi (Colletotrichum circinans, Botrytis allii, Aspergillus niger, A. alliaceus, and Gibberella saubinetti) [58]. The antifungal property was corroborated by Hooker et al. [59], and after this, many others investigations were followed. In general, volatile sulfur compounds demonstrate more potent inhibitory effects toward fungi than bacteria [60].
Studies have shown that GLS did not present antimicrobial activity in their intact form, only after enzymatic hydrolysis. Therefore, sinigrin which is one of the most important GLS present in oriental mustard presented no effect against Paecilomyces fumosoroseus [61]. Sinigrin also did not affect Alternaria brassicae (causative agent of black spot) in Czapek-Dox agar medium, as well as sclerotium formation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (causative agent of stem rot) [62]. Native GLS had no fungitoxic activity, whereas their hydrolytic products, in particular glucoiberin, glucoerucin, glucoheirolin, and glucotropaeolin, inhibited growth of Rhizoctonia solani, S. sclerotiorum, Diaporthe phaseolorum, and Pythium irregulare with different inhibitory responses depending upon the chemical nature of the hydrolytic products [3, 63].
The composition of hydrolysis products from GLS varies according to substrate, pH conditions, presence of ferrous ions, and specific protein factors. The chemical nature of the breakdown products depends mainly on the structure of the GLS, plant species, and reaction conditions [64]. They are classified as nitriles , TCs, epithionitriles, oxazolidine-2-thiones, ITCs, and epithioalkanes with different antimicrobial activity [65].
From these groups, ITC is the major inhibitor of microbial populations, and differences in the potential are related to the nature of their side chain [66]. Assays with ITCs have been conducted directly as a component of a growth medium and a model food system and (generally more antimicrobial effective) in the gaseous form [49]. Volatiles released from GLS, predominantly 2-propenyl GLS, showed toxic effects to the blackleg fungus, Leptosphaeria maculans, in vitro [67]. AITC gaseous at 0.1 mg L−1 for 4 h showed a fungistatic effect against Botrytis cinerea (gray mold) reducing by over 45% the incidence of the gray mold on strawberries [68]. AITC (2 ppm) inhibited the growth of Penicillium roqueforti, P. corylophilum, Eurotium repens, A. flavus, and Endomyces fibuliger on rye bread slices in airtight environment [69].
Sellam et al. [70] demonstrate that ITCs were effective in vitro in different development stages of A. brassicicola and A. brassicae. Moreover, antifungal activity of 57 substituted derivatives of PEITC was determined on A. niger, Penicillium cyclopium, Rhizopus oryzae, A. flavus, A. oryzae, A. fumigatus, P. brevicompactum, Cladosporium herbarum, Trichoderma viride, Alternaria tenuis, Monilia sitophila, Cytospora sp., Schizophyllum commune, Fusarium sp., Cephalothecium roseum, and Trichophyton gypseum in culture medium. The authors describe that several PEITC derivatives, as well as the most active natural ITC analogues, represent remarkable antifungal compounds ; however, there are some differences in their antifungal potential [13].
Several studies have been conducted using glucosinolate -derived products against molds and yeast (Table 2). These examples show the efficiency of ITCs against saprophytic and parasitic fungal species, usually applied at low levels in culture medium, food products, and plant defense. In agricultural sciences, ITCs such as AITC have been effective fumigants on the control of insects and fungal species [71]. Among ITCs, allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) is one of the most studied. Beneficial biological effects have been reported including antibacterial, antifungal, anti-nematode, and anti-insect activities [72]. Its uses as natural preservative have been growing because of its food origin and low toxicity [30]. The antimicrobial activity of AITC, as well as other ITCs, is related with the concentration of the compound applied, time of exposure, strains, microbial loading, temperature, food composition, pH conditions, water activity, and on diffusion of the vapor in food packaging systems [48, 71, 73]. However, its use on food products usually is limited by the interference of organoleptic characteristics, its poor aqueous solubility, instability at high temperature, and intrinsic food compounds.
GLS-derived products have also been presenting antibiocidal potential against yeast. Kyung and Fleming [23] reported that AITC showed antifungal effects against fermentative yeasts on culture media with an MIC ≤ 4 ppm. Candida albicans, a fungus potentially pathogenic to human, was inhibited by fresh cauliflower juice (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) [74]. In the use of BITC and 3- and 4-methoxybenzyl ITCs, antifungal effects against Aspergillus fumigatus and C. albicans were revealed with MIC of 1 μg mL−1 (Radulovic et al., 2012). An essential oil obtained from white mustard seeds containing 25 mg L−1 of 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate (4HBITC)/L was able to stabilize an acidified fruit drink against acid-tolerant bacteria (Gluconobacter species) and preservative-resistant yeast (Zygosaccharomyces bailii) for 28 days at ambient temperature [75].
Thus, the ability of ITCs to reduce mycotoxigenic molds and mycotoxins was also investigated. P. expansum (patulin producer) was inhibited with > 50 mg of AITC, whereas A. parasiticus (aflatoxin producer) in culture medium was sensible to doses > 5 [76]. Aspergillus parasiticus was inactivated in fresh pizza crust after 30 days of AITC exposition and suppressed aflatoxin formation [77]. AITC, BITC, and PITC inhibited the growth of Gibberella moniliformis strains 2983, 5847, and 5850 and reduced 2.1–89.7% of the mycelium size. ITCs also reacted with FB2 in bread reducing the levels by 73–100% [78]. Benzyl-ITC showed antifungal activity against Alternaria alternata on tomato [79] and ethyl-ITC against P. expansum on apple [71], both patulin producers. AITC gaseous at 0.1 μL L−1 was investigated to reduce aflatoxin produced by A. parasiticus and beauvericin and enniatins produced by Fusarium. The authors observed reduction of 6.9% to 23% mycotoxin levels while at 10 μL L−1; AITC completely inhibited the production of mycotoxins for 30 days [80]. In a commercial packaging simulation, GLS present in yellow and oriental mustard flours reduced aflatoxin B1, B2, G1, and G2 in nuts (peanut, cashew, almonds, walnut, pistachio, and hazelnut). This reduction ranged from 83.1 to 87.2% in the oriental mustard flour, whereas it was 27.0–32.5% in the yellow flour [81]. AITC reacted with beauvericin in solution, reducing from 20% to 100%, and in a food system, beauvericin was reduced from 10% to 65%, in a dose-dependent manner [82]. AITC, BITC, and PITC diminished fumonisin B1 (FB1) and B2 (FB2) levels in solution from 42% to 100%, and on fumigation treatment (50, 100, and 500 μL L−1), ITCs were able to reduce 53–96% of FB1 and 29–91% of FB2 contained in corn products, with four reaction products identified through the reaction [83].
3.1 Plant Protection
GLS-derived products have been recognized as antimicrobial agents, and several studies demonstrated the ability to control soil-borne plant pathogens [84–87]. The GLS content in plant reaches about 1% (highly variable) of dry weight in some tissues of Brassica vegetables [88]. Plant species and age are the major determinants of GLS composition [89], but also other factors such as nutritional status of the plant, fungal infection, and insect damage have significant effect on the content in growing plants [64].
Qualitative and quantitative differences of GLS composition vary also among plant organs [89]. GLS are found mainly in seeds, siliques, and young leaves, while intermediate contents are detected in leaves, stems, and roots [90]. Indole GLS and their hydrolysis products found in large amounts in roots may be related to their higher stability in the soil than air [91]. These compounds play a role in the development of root disease, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae [92]. Volatile compounds from macerated Brassicae root tissue inhibited the fungal pathogen of wheat, Gaeumannomyces graminis [87]. Nevertheless, roots of a transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana had altered the profile of GLS compared with non-transgenic, with influence in the microbial community on roots and active populations in the rhizosphere [37]. The rhizospheric strains of Fusarium showed a protective effect on Lepidium sativum against Pythium ultimum. Accumulation of ITCs in roots not only increases resistance of the plant but also gives a competitive advantage to Fusarium strains [93].
Degradation products of GLS showed an inhibition of L. maculans at concentrations greater than 40 μg mL−1 [94]. Cauliflower plants (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) infected by Peronospora parasitica resistant to downy mildew presented higher sinigrin content than the susceptible variety. The susceptible seedlings exhibited a 12% decrease in glucobrassicin and a 25% increase in methoxyglucobrassicin when compared with healthy ones six days after treatment whereas no difference in glucobrassicin and a 10% increase in methoxyglucobrassicin were observed in healthy and inoculated resistant seedlings [95].
The disease resistance may be dependent on fungal pathogen species and the composition of GLS-derived products present in the plant [91]. Arabidopsis thaliana mutant extracts were investigated on B. cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola isolates. A. brassicicola was more affected by aliphatic GLS and ITCs, while B. cinerea isolates showed variable composition-dependent sensitivity to GLS and their hydrolysis products [96]. Propenyl ITC and EITC demonstrated fungistatic potential at 0.3 μL, which inhibited mycelial growth and completely suppressed conidial and chlamydospore germination of four Fusarium oxysporum isolates. EITC, BITC, and PEITC were fungitoxic to F. oxysporum conidia and chlamydospores [97]. ITCs released from cabbage tissues were effective toward P. parasitica, P. ultimum, and Sclerotium rolfsii [98]. PEITC inhibited the growth of a range of fungi, oomycetes, and bacteria [99]. Pedras and Sorensen [100] observed that 5-(methylsulfamyl)-pentyl-1-ITC, 6-(methylsulfamyl)-hexyl-1-ITC, and 6-(methylsulfinyl)-hexyl-1-ITC inhibited spore germination of Phoma lingam virulent isolate BJ 125 at a concentration of 5 × 10−4 M. Alternaria infection was positively correlated with GLS content in 33 oilseed rape lines (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera) [101].
4 Structure Activity Relationships
The mechanism of ITC antimicrobial action is unclear, but some hypotheses have been proposed. The central electrophilic carbon of ITCs (R-N = C = S) undergoes rapid reaction with hydroxyls , amines , and thiols , generating products such as carbamates, thiourea, and thiocarbamates, respectively [102, 103]. Thereby, AITC reacted with glutathione, amino acids, proteins, water, alcohol, and sulfites [104, 105], and it was able to disintegrate the cysteine disulfide bond through an oxidative process [104, 106].
Zsolnai [19] reported that thioglycolate and cysteine could diminish the antibacterial action of ITCs. The study also describes that the antimicrobial action of ITCs may be linked to the inhibition of sulfhydryl enzymes. This finding is consistent with those observations of Luciano et al. [106], who reported that AITC was able to react with glutathione and cysteine naturally present in meat, which interfered on their antimicrobial activity. In addition, the presence of proteic substances reduced genotoxic activity of AITC, PEITC [107], and MITC [108], on which the compounds were able to cause DNA damage in Salmonella, E. coli, and human cells (Hep G2) [109].
Kojima and Ogawa [110] suggested that ITCs act by inhibiting the oxygen uptake by yeast through the uncoupler action of oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria of yeast, inhibiting the coupling between the electron transport and phosphorylation reactions, thus hindering the ATP synthesis. However, the levels to achieve both enzymatic and oxygen uptake inhibitions used in the study were 200 times greater than the actual MIC of the ITCs for those organisms [30].
It is not clear if AITC crosses membranes and enters the cytoplasm of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells or if it has an effect on cell membranes. Inside a cell, AITC can react with glutathione, sulfites, amino acids, oligopeptides, proteins, and water [111]. Delaquis and Mazza [10] suggest that AITC might cause inactivation of essential intracellular enzymes through oxidative cleavage of disulfide bonds. Lin et al. [112] observed damages on the bacteria cell by exposition to AITC, creating pores on cell membranes and inducing leaking of cellular substances. AITC was able to modify the internal structure of L. monocytogenes when compared to non-treated cells when analyzed by transmission electron microscopy [104]. On the other hand, Ahn et al. [113] observed no damage in cell wall or leakage of ATP when AITC was tested against L. monocytogenes. The reduction of ATP could be the result of inhibition of enzymes related to ATP formation or depletion of proton motive force.
The mechanism of fungal death by ITCs was investigated by Calmes et al. [114]. Exposure of AITC, PEITC, and BITC in A. brassicicola decreased oxygen consumption rate, intracellular accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial membrane depolarization. The two major regulators of the response to oxidative stress , MAP kinase AbHog1 and the transcription factor AbAP1, were activated in the presence of ITCs. Once activated by ITC-derived ROS, AbAP1 may promote the expression of different oxidative-response genes. Besides, fungal strains deficient in AbHog1 or AbAP1 were hypersensitive to ITCs, and it might be useful to understand the mechanism of fungal resistance. In other studies, the authors [13] suggest some differences on the mode of action of 57 ITCs and related compounds investigated against A. niger, P. cyclopium, Rhizopus oryzae, and other species. These variations occurred in compounds in which -NCS group is directly bound on the aromatic moiety compared with the bounds on aliphatic radical. Normally, aromatic ITCs are more toxic than aliphatic, and the fungal toxicity of aliphatic ITCs decreased with the increasing length of the side chain [64].
Furthermore, it may be considered that AITC degraded in aqueous solution at 37 °C, generating allyl dithiocarbamate, diallyl tetra- and pentasulfide, sulfur, and N, N’-diallylthiourea, dependent on temperature and pH conditions [104] However, there is no information relating this degradation to ITC’s antimicrobial potential [30].
5 Conclusions
With the current trend, natural compounds are preferred and widely studied. Considering the data from several studies carried out, it may be observed that glucosinolates demonstrate a biocidal effect after their enzymatic hydrolysis . These breakdown products show a huge antibacterial and antifungal capacity, and they may be used on food preservation as well as plant defense. Several studies have demonstrated that the structure of glucosinolates and the microbial strain are responsible for their antimicrobial potential. Among the GLS hydrolysis products, ITCs are the main group that demonstrated an efficiency to reduce microbial growth. Allyl isothiocyanates are the most investigated ITCs against microorganisms, and its use as a fumigant agent on food preservation has been investigated.
There is not enough information regarding the mechanism behind the antimicrobial activity of GLS. Studies indicated that the central electrophilic carbon of ITCs may react with hydroxyls, amines, and thiols. However, it is not clear if ITC crosses the membrane and enters the cytoplasm or if they have an effect on cell membranes. Thus, further studies are necessary to clarify the mechanism of these active compounds on microorganisms and evaluate the feasibility application of GLS products as food preservative through fumigation treatment.
Abbreviations
- AAM:
-
Allylamine
- AC:
-
Allyl cyanide
- AITC:
-
Allyl isothiocyanate
- ASC:
-
Ascorbigen
- ATC:
-
Ally thiocyanate
- BAM:
-
Benzylamine
- BC:
-
Benzyl cyanide
- BITC:
-
Benzyl isothiocyanate
- CEPT:
-
1-Cyano-2,3-epithiopropane
- DIM:
-
3,3′-Di-indolylmethane
- EITC:
-
Ethyl isothiocyanate
- GLS:
-
Glucosinolate
- I3C:
-
Indole-3-carbinol
- IAN:
-
Indole-3-acetonitrile
- ITC:
-
Isothiocyanate
- MAP:
-
Modified atmosphere packaging
- MCT:
-
Medium-chain triglyceride
- MITC:
-
Methyl isothiocyanate
- PAM:
-
2-Phenylethylamine
- PEC:
-
2-Phenylethyl cyanide
- PEITC:
-
Phenylethyl isothiocyanate
- PITC:
-
Phenyl isothiocyanate
- SBO:
-
Soybean oil
- SFN:
-
Sulforaphane
- TC:
-
Thiocyanate
References
Lucera A, Costa C, Conte A, Del Nobile MA (2012) Food applications of natural antimicrobial compounds. Front Microbiol 3(287):1–13
Dufour V, Stahl M, Baysse C (2015) The antibacterial properties of isothiocyanates. Microbiol 161:229–243
Vig A, Rampal G, Thinda TH, Arora S (2009) Bio-protective effects of glucosinolates – a review. LWT – Food Sci Technol 42:1561–1572
Vaughn SF (1999) Glucosinolates as natural pesticides. In: Cutler HG, Cutler SJ (eds) Biologically active natural products. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Gyawali R, Ibrahim SA (2014) Natural products as antimicrobial agents. Food Control 46:412–429
Hansen M, Møller P, Sørensen H, De Trejo MC (1995) Glucosinolates in broccoli stored under controlled atmosphere. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120(6):1069–1074
Chen S, Andreasson E (2001) Update on glucosinolate metabolism and transport. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:743–758
Cataldi TRI, Rubino A, Lelario F, Bufo SA (2007). Naturally occurring glucosinolates in plant extracts of rocket salad (Eruca sativa L.) identified by liquid chromatography coupled with negative ion electrospray ionization and quadrupole ion-trap mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 21:2374–2388
Kostova Z, Rashev C, Lulov R (1983) Studies on the possibilities to disinfect goose eggs and hen eggs with allyl isothiocyanate (AITC). Nauch Tr Vissh Selskostop Inst Vasil Kolarov Plodiv 28:133–141
Delaquis PJ, Mazza G (1995) Antimicrobial properties of isothiocyanates in food preservation. Food Technol 49:73–84
Mithen RF (2001) Glucosinolates and their degradation products. Adv Bot Res 35:214–262
Chew FS (1988) Biological effects of glucosinolates. In: Cutler HG (ed) Biologically active natural products: potential use in agriculture. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Drobnica L, Zemanová M, Nemec P, Antos K, Kristian P, Stullerova A, Knoppová V, Nemec P (1968) Antifungal activity of isothiocyanates and related compounds. Appl Microbiol 15:701–709
Saavedra MJ, Borges A, Dias C, Aires A, Bennett RN, Rosa ES, Simoes M (2010) Antimicrobial activity of phenolics and glucosinolate hydrolysis products and their synergy with streptomycin against pathogenic bacteria. Med Chem 6:174–183
Lewis JA, Papavizas GC (1971) Effect of sulfur-containing volatile compounds and vapors from cabbage decomposition on Aphanomyces euteiches. Phytopath 61:208–214
Foter MJ, Golik AM (1938) Inhibitory properties of horseradish vapors. Food Res 3:609–613
Foter MJ (1940) Bactericidal properties of allyl isothiocyanate and related oils. Food Res 3:147–151
Virtanen AI (1965) Studies on organic sulfur containing compounds and other labile substances in plants. Angew Chem Int Ed 1:207–228
Zsolnai T (1966) Antimicrobial effect of thiocyanates and isothiocyanates. Arztl Forsch 16:870–876
Kanemaru K, Miyamoto T (1990) Inhibitory effects on the growth of several bacteria by brown mustard and allyl isothiocyanate. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi 37:823–829
Shofran BG, Purrington ST, Breidt F, Fleming HP (1998) Antimicrobial properties of sinigrin and its hydrolysis products. J Food Sci 63:621–624
Brabban AD, Edwards C (1995) The effects of glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products on microbial growth. J Appl Bact 79:171–177
Kyung KH, Fleming HP (1997) Antimicrobial activity of sulfur compounds derived from cabbage. J Food Prot 60:67–71
Delaquis PJ, Sholberg PL (1997) Antimicrobial activity of gaseous allyl isothiocyanate. J Food Prot 60:943–947
Fahey JW, Haristoy X, Dolan PM (2002) Sulforaphane inhibits extracellular, intracellular, and antibiotic-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori and prevents benzo[a]pyrene-induced stomach tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7610–7615
Haristoy X, Angioi-Duprez K, Duprez A, Lozniewski A (2003) Efficacy of sulforaphane in eradicating Helicobacter pylori human gastric xenografts implanted in nude mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3982–3984
Haristoy X, Fahey JW, Scholtus I, Lozeniewski A (2005) Evaluation of the antimicrobial effects of several isothiocyanates on Helicobacter pylori. Planta Med 71:326–330
Ono H, Tesaki S, Tanabe S, Watanabe M (1998) 6-Methylsulfinylhexyle isothiocyanate and its homologues as food originated compounds with antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 62:363–365
Liu TT, Yang TS (2010) Stability and antimicrobial activity of Allyl Isothiocyanate during long-term storage in an oil-in-water emulsion. J Food Sci 75:C445–C451
Luciano FB, Holley RA (2009) Enzymatic inhibition by allyl isothiocyanate and factors affecting its antimicrobial action against Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int J Food Microbiol 131:240–245
Radulovic NS, Dekic MS, Stojanovic-Radic ZZ (2012) Antimicrobial volatile glucosinolate autolysis products from Hornungia petraea (L.) Rchb. (Brassicae). Phytochem Lett 5:351–357
Olaimat AN, Holley RA (2013) Effects of changes in pH and temperature on the inhibition of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes by Allyl isothiocyanate. Food Control 34:414–419
Wilson AE, Bergaentzlé M, Bindler F, Marchioni E, Lintz A, Ennahar S (2013) In vitro efficacies of various isothiocyanates from cruciferous vegetables as antimicrobial agents against foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria. Food Control 30:318–324
Dias C, Aires A, Saavedra MJ (2014) Antimicrobial activity of isothiocyanates from cruciferous plants against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Int J Mol Sci 15:19552–19561
Park CM, Taormina PJ, Beuchat LR (2000) Efficacy of allyl isothiocyanate in killing enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 on alfalfa seeds. Int J Food Microbiol 56:13–20
Aires A, Mota VR, Saavedra MJ, Monteiro AA, Simoes M, Rosa EA, Bennett RN (2009) Initial in vitro evaluations of the antibacterial activities of glucosinolate enzymatic hydrolysis products against plant pathogenic bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 106:2096–2105
Bressan M, Roncato MA, Bellvert F, Comte G, Haichar FZ, Achouak W, Berge O (2009) Exogenous glucosinolate produced by Arabidopsis thaliana has an impact on microbes in the rhizosphere and plant roots. ISME J 3:1243–1257
Aires A, Mota VR, Saavedra MJ, Rosa EA, Bennett RN (2009) The antimicrobial effects of glucosinolates and their respective enzymatic hydrolysis products on bacteria isolated from the human intestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol 106:2086–2095
Tajima H, Kimoto H, Taketo A (2001) Specific antimicrobial synergism of synthetic hydroxy isothiocyanates with aminoglycoside antibiotics. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 65:1886–1888
Tajima H, Kimoto H, Taketo A (2003) Paradoxical effect of synthetic hydroxy isothiocyanates on antimicrobial action of aminoglycosides. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67:1844–1846
Palaniappan K, Holley RA (2010) Use of natural antimicrobials to increase antibiotic susceptibility of drug resistant bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 140:164–168
Freitas E, Aires A, Rosa E, Saavedra MJ (2013) Antibacterial activity and synergistic effect between watercress extracts, 2‐phenylethyl isothiocyanate and antibiotics against 11 isolates of Escherichia coli from clinical and animal source. Lett Appl Microbiol 57(4):266–273
Tressler DK, Joslyn MA (1954) The chemistry and technology of fruit and vegetables juice production. Avi Publ Co, New York
Kosker O, Esselen WB Jr, Fellers CR (1952) Effect of allylisothiocyanate and related substances on the thermal resistance of Aspergillus niger, Saccharomyces ellipsoideus and Bacillus thermoacidurans. Food Res 16:510–514
Isshiki K, Tokuoka K, Mori R, Chiba S (1992) Preliminary examination of allyl isothiocyanate vapor for food preservation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 56:1476–1477
Ward SM, Delaquis PJ, Holley RA, Mazza G (1998) Inhibition of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria on agar and pre-cooked roasted beef by volatile horseradish distillates. Food Res Int 31:19–26
Delaquis PJ, Ward SM, Holley RA, Cliff MC, Mazza G (1999) Microbiological, chemical and sensory properties of pre-cooked roast beef preserved with horseradish essential oil. J Food Sci 64:519–524
Lin CM, Kim J, Du WX, Wei CI (2000) Bactericidal activity of isothiocyanate against pathogens on fresh produce. J Food Prot 63:25–30
Nadarajah D, Han JH, Holley RA (2005) Use of mustard flour to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef under nitrogen flushed packaging. Int J Food Microbiol 99:257–267
Chacon PA, Muthukumarasamy P, Holley RA (2006) Elimination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from fermented dry sausages at an organoleptically acceptable level of microencapsulated Allyl isothiocyanate. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3096–3102
Schirmer BC, Langsrud S (2010) Evaluation of natural antimicrobials on typical meat spoilage bacteria in vitro and in vacuum-packed pork meat. J Food Sci 75:M98–M102
Chen W, Jin TJ, Gurtler JB, Geveke DJ, Fan X (2012) Inactivation of Salmonella on whole cantaloupe by application of an antimicrobial coating containing chitosan and allyl isothiocyanate. Int J Food Microbiol 155:165–170
Ko JA, Kim WY, Park HJ (2012) Effects of microencapsulated Allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) on the extension of the shelf-life of Kimchi. Int J Food Microbiol 153:92–98
Piercey MJ, Mazzanti G, Budge SM, Delaquis PJ, Paulson AT, Truelstrup Hansen L (2012) Antimicrobial activity of cyclodextrin entrapped allyl isothiocyanate in a model system and packaged fresh-cut onions. Food Microbiol 30:213–218
David JRD, Ekanayake A, Singh I, Farina B, Meyer M (2013) Effect of white mustard essential oil on inoculated Salmonella sp. in a sauce with particulates. J Food Prot 76:580–587
Shin J, Harte B, Ryser E, Selke S (2010) Active packaging of fresh chicken breast, with allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) in combination with modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) to control the growth of pathogens. J Food Sci 75:M65–M71
EFSA (2010) EFSA panel on food additives and nutrient sources added to food (ANS): scientific opinion on the safety of allyl isothiocyanate for the proposed uses as a food additive. EFSA J 8:1943–1983
Walker JC, Morell S, Foster HH (1937) Toxicity of mustard oils and related sulfur compounds to certain fungi. Am J Bot 24:536–541
Hooker WJ, Walker JC, Smith FG (1943) Toxicity of beta-phenethyl isothiocyanate to certain fungi. Am Soc Am 30:632–637
Kyung KH (2011) Antimicrobial activity of volatile sulfur compounds in foods. ACS Sym Ser 1068(16):323–338
Vega FE, Dowd PF, McGuire MR, Jackson MA, Nelsen TC (1997) In vitro effects of secondary plant compounds on germination of blastospores of the entomopathogenic fungus Paecilomyces fumosoroseus (deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). J Investerbr Pathol 70:209–213
Whitmore BB, Naidu AS (2000) Glucosinolates. In: Naidu AS (ed) Natural food antimicrobial systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Manici LM, Lazzeri L, Palmieri S (1997) In vitro fungitoxic activity of some glucosinolates and their enzyme-derived products toward plant pathogenic fungi. J Agric Food Chem 45:2768–2773
Redovnikovic IR, Glivetic T, Delonga K, Vorkapic-Furac J (2008) Glucosinolates and their potential role in plant. Period Biol 110:297–309
Cartea ME, Velasco P (2008) Glucosinolates in Brassica foods: bioavailability in food and significance for human health. Phytochem Rev 7:213–229
Mayton HS, Oliver C, Vaughn SF, Loria R (1996) Correlation of fungicidal activity of Brassica species with allyl isothiocyanate production in macerated leaf tissue. Phytopathology 86:267–271
Sexton AC, Kirkegaard JA, Howlett BJ (1999) Glucosinolates in Brassica juncea and resistance to Australian isolates of Leptosphaeria maculans, the blackleg fungus. Australas Plant Pathol 28:95–102
Ugolini L, Martini C, Lazzeri L, D’Alvino L, Mari M (2014) Control of postharvest grey mould (Botrytis cinerea Per.: Fr.) on strawberries by glucosinolate-derived allyl isothiocyanate treatments. Postharvest Biol Tec 90:34–39
Suhr KI, Nielsen PV (2005) Inhibition of fungal growth on wheat and rye bread by modified atmosphere packaging and active packaging using volatile mustard essential oil. J Food Sci 70:37–44
Sellam A, Iacomi-Vasilescu B, Simoneau P (2007) In vitro antifungal activity of brassinin, camalexin and two isothiocyanates against the crucifer pathogens Alternaria brassicicola and Alternaria brassicae. Plant Pathol 56:296–301
Wu H, Zhang X, Zhang G, Zeng S, Kin K (2011) Antifungal vapour-phase activity of a combination of allyl isothiocyanate and ethyl isothiocyanate against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum infection on apples. J Phytopathol 159:4050–4455
Wang SY, Chen CT, Yin J (2010) Effect of allyl isothiocyanate on antioxidants and fruit decay of blueberries. Food Chem 120:199–204
Ma J (2012) Allyl isothiocyanate derived from oriental mustard meal as a natural antimicrobial to inhibit the growth of moulds on bread. Master thesis. Guelph
Sisti M, Amagliani G, Brandi G (2003) Antifungal activity of Brassica oleracea var. botrytis fresh aqueous juice. Fitoterapia 74:453
Ekanayake A, Kester JJ, Li JJ, Zehentbauer GN, Bunke PR, Zent JB (2006) Isogard TM: a natural anti-microbial agent derived from white mustard seed. Acta Hortic 709:101–108
Manyes L, Luciano FB, Manes J, Meca G (2015) In vitro antifungal activity of allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) against Aspergillus parasiticus and Penicillium expansum and evaluation of the AITC estimated daily intake. Food Chem Toxicol 83:293–299
Quiles JM, Manyes L, Luciano F, Manes J, Meca G (2015) Influence of antimicrobial compound allyl isothiocyanate against the Aspergillus parasiticus growth and its aflatoxins production in pizza crust. Food Chem Toxicol 83:222–228
Azaiez I, Meca G, Manyes L, Fernández-Franzón M (2013) Antifungal activity of gaseous allyl, benzyl and phenyl isothiocyanate in vitro and their use for fumonisins reduction in bread. Food Control 32:428–434
Troncoso-Rojas R, Sanchez-Estrada A, Ruelas C, Grcia HS, Tiznado ME (2005) Effect of benzyl isothiocyanate on tomato fruit infection development by Alternaria alternate. J Sci Food Agric 85:1427–1434
Nazareth TM, Bordin K, Manyes L, Meca G, Manes J, Luciano FB (2016) Gaseous allyl isothiocyanate to inhibit the production of aflatoxins, beauvericin and enniatins by Aspergillus parasiticus and Fusarium poae in wheat flour. Food Control 62:317–321
Hontanaya C, Meca G, Luciano FB, Manes J, Font G (2015) Inhibition of aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2 production by Aspergillus parasiticus in nuts using yellow and oriental mustard flours. Food Control 47:154–160
Meca G, Luciano FB, Zhou T, Tsao R, Manes J (2012) Chemical reduction of the mycotoxin beauvericin using allyl isothiocyanate. Food Chem Toxicol 50:1755–1762
Azaiez I, Meca G, Manyes L, Luciano FB, Fernández-Frazón M (2013) Study of the chemical reduction of the fumonisins toxicity using allyl, benzyl and phenyl isothiocyanate in model solution and in food products. Toxicon 63:137–146
Chan MKY, Close RC (1987) Aphanomyces root rot of pears. 3. Control by use of cruciferous amendments. N Z J Agric Res 30:225–233
Vierheilig H, Ocampo JA (1990) Effect of isothiocyanates on germination of spores of G. mosseae. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1161–1163
Gamliel A, Stapleton JJ (1993) Characterization of antifungal volatile compounds evolved from solarized soil amended with cabbage residues. Phytopathology 83:899–905
Angus JF, Gardner PA, Kirkegaard JA, Desmarchelier JM (1994) Biofumigation: isothiocyanates released from Brassica roots inhibit growth of take-all fungus. Plant and Soil 162:107–112
Rosa EAS (1997) Daily variation in glucosinolate concentrations on the leaves and roots of cabbage seedlings in two constant temperature regimes. J Sci Food Agric 73:364–368
Fahey JW, Zalcmann AT, Talalay P (2001) The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 56:5–51
Agneta R, Lelario F, De Maria S, Mollers C, Bufo SA, Rivelli AR (2014) Glucosinolate profile and distribution among plant tissue and phonological stages of field-grown horseradish. Phytochemistry 106:178–187
Aghajanzadehdivaei T (2015) Sulfur metabolism, glucosinolates and fungal resistance in Brassica. Doctoral thesis. University of Groningen, p 172
Ludwing-Mueller J, Bennett R, Kiddle G, Ihmig S, Ruppel M, Hilgenberg W (1999) The host range of Plasmodiophora brassicae and its relationship to endogenous glucosinolate content. New Phytol 141:443–458
Ishimoto H, Fukushi Y, Tahara S (2004) Non-pathogenic Fusarium strains protect the seedlings of Lepidium sativum from Pythium ultimum. Soil Biol Biochem 36:409–414
Mithen RF, Lewis BG (1986) In vitro activity of glucosinolates and their products against Leptosphaeria maculans. Trans Br Mycol Soc 87:433–440
Ménard R, Laure JP, Silué D, Thouvenot D (1999) Glucosinolates in cauliflower as biochemical markers for resistance against downy mildew. Phytochemistry 52:29–35
Buxdorf K, Yaffe H, Barda O, Levy M (2013) The effects of glucosinolates and their breakdown products on necrotrophic fungi. Effects of glucosinolate on fungi. 8:1–10. Available on www.phosone.org
Smolinska U, Morra MJ, Knudsen GR, James RL (2003) Isothiocyanates produced by Brassicaceae species as inhibitors of Fusarium oxysporum. Plant Dis 87:407–412
Greenhalg JR, Mitchell ND (1976) The involvement of flavor volatiles in the resistance to downy mildew of wild and cultivated forms of Brassica oleracea. New Phytol 61:709–714
Smith BJ, Kikegaard JA (2002) In vitro inhibition of soil microorganisms by 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate. Plant Pathol 51:585–593
Pedras MS, Sorensen JL (1998) Phytoalexin accumulation and antifungal compounds from the crucifer wasabi. Phytochemistry 49:1959–1965
Giamoustaris A, Mithen R (1997) Glucosinolates and disease resistance in oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera). Plant Pathol 46:271–275
Zhang Y, Talalay P (1994) Anticarcinogenic activities of organic isothiocyanates: chemistry and mechanisms. Cancer Res 54:1916–1930
Brown KK, Hampton MB (2011) Biological targets if isothiocyanates. Biochim Biophys Acta 1810:888–894
Kawakishi S, Namiki M (1969) Decomposition of allyl isothiocyanate in aqueous solution. Agric Biol Chem 33:452–459
Cejpek K, Valusek J, Velisek J (2000) Reactions of allyl isothiocyanate with alanine, glycine and several peptides in model systems. J Agric Food Chem 48:3560–3565
Luciano FB, Hosseinian FS, Beta T, Holley RA (2008) Effect of free-SH containing compounds on allyl isothiocyanate antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Food Sci 73:M214–M220
Kassie F, Knasmuller S (2000) Genotoxic effects of allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) and phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC). Chem Biol Interact 127:163–180
Kassie F, Laky B, Nobis E, Kundi M, Knasmuller S (2001) Genotoxic effects of methyl isothiocyanate. Mut Res Gen Toxicol Environ Mutagen 490:1–9
Luciano FB (2010) Mechanism of action and utilization of isothiocyanates from mustard against Escherichia coli O 157:H7. Doctoral thesis. The University of Manitoba
Kojima M, Oawa K (1971) Studies on the effect of isothiocyanates and their analogues on microorganisms. (I) Effects of isothiocyanates on the oxygen uptake of yeasts. J Ferment Technol 49:740–746
Hyldgaard M, Mygind T, Meyer RL (2012) Essential oils in food preservation: mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components. Front Microbiol 3:1–24
Lin CM, Preston JF, Wei CI (2000) Antibacterial mechanism of allyl isothiocyanate. J Food Prot 63:727–734
Ahn E, Kjim J, Shin D (2001) Antimicrobial effects of allyl isothiocyanate on several microorganisms. Korean J Food Sci Technol 31:206–211
Calmes B, Guyen GN, Durmur J, Brisach CA, Campion C, Iacomi B, Pigné S, Dias E, Macherel D, Guillemette T, Simoneau P (2015) Glucosinolate-derived isothiocyanates impact mitochondrial function in fungal cells and elicit an oxidative stress response necessary for growth recovery. Front Plant Sci 6:1–14
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Economy and Competitiveness Spanish Ministry (AGL2013-43194-P), by the pre-PhD program of the University of Valencia “Santiago Grisolia,” and by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Process 400896/2014-1) from Brazil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Saladino, F., Bordin, K., Luciano, F.B., Franzón, M.F., Mañes, J., Meca, G. (2017). Antimicrobial Activity of the Glucosinolates. In: Mérillon, JM., Ramawat, K. (eds) Glucosinolates. Reference Series in Phytochemistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25462-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25462-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25461-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25462-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics