Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

1 Introduction

Nowadays concern about one’s health and well-being is growing due to realization of importance of co-relation between diet, nutrition, and healthy lifestyle. Consumers demand for safe and varied food products which will ensure longevity and reduce risk of diseases. This is mainly due to increased incidences of obesity and overweight in men and women, chronic and non-communicable diseases, and mental health problems like depression, poor memory, and loss of memory. Majority of them are the result of increased urbanization, lack of physical exercise, and inclusion of high calorie foods in diet. Hence, foods which play significant role in various disorders or diseases are gaining importance. This has led to commercialization of functional foods. These are the foods that positively affect health and can be defined as foods containing significant levels of biologically active components that provide specific health benefits beyond the traditional nutrients they contain (Drozen and Harrison 1998). Such bioactive components include probiotics, antioxidants, omega-3-fatty acids, or synthetic food ingredients like prebiotics, vitamins, minerals, amino acids, proteins, etc. Another important reason for increasing interest in functional foods is the increase in healthcare cost.

Functional food may help to prevent or reduce risk of developing diseases and enhance human health. Noteworthy benefits of functional foods are in reducing risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and osteoporosis. Also, they play an important role in the improvement in general health and mental health. Thus, they have both protective and remedial effects (Stanton et al. 2001). Majority of the immunomodulatory effects of functional foods are due to probiotic microorganisms conventionally carried through milk-based products like yogurt, curd, cheese, etc. However, nowadays there is growing interest in non-dairy functional foods fortified with probiotics although traditionally they have been consumed in various countries for a long time. This chapter focuses on various non-dairy probiotic foods, their nutritional value, technological aspects, and challenges in developing such food types.

2 Global Market

The world market of functional foods is predicted to reach $130 billion after 2015 (http://www.reportlinker.com/ci02036/Functional-Food.html). Among the functional foods most important are probiotic yogurts, plant sterol spreads, functional waters, juices, deserts, and cheeses (Granato et al. 2010; Stanton et al. 2001). Major factors affecting their market potential are government support, consumer demand, consumer confidence in products, and health awareness. Functional foods have to compete with organic foods and foods with low fat, low sugar, and low salt labels. Thus, the prerequisites to increase their market are communication of their health benefits in simple language, good taste, convenience, and affordable price. In addition, brand name, loyalty, advertising and promotion, quality control, competitors, and economics are also important (Euromonitor 2009). In Europe, huge market exists for pro-, pre-, and synbiotics (Bhadoria and Mahapatra 2011).

3 Probiotics

3.1 Health Benefits

Probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amount confer health benefits on the host by improving the properties of indigenous microflora” (Tabbers and Benninga 2007). Earlier research has shown that certain strains of probiotic bacteria have many health benefits. These microorganisms

  1. (a)

    enhance immune response by (1) improving innate and acquired immunity, (2) changing cytokine profiles, and (3) increasing levels of immunoglobulins.

  2. (b)

    reduce severity of constipation and improve bowel moment frequency (Ouwehand et al. 2003)

  3. (c)

    control urogenital infections in women (Dani et al. 2002)

  4. (d)

    inhibit effect on Helicobacter pylori (Hamilton-Miller et al. 2003)

  5. (e)

    reduce the risk of bladder cancer (Rafter 2004)

  6. (f)

    decrease LDL cholesterol levels (Pereira and Gibson 2002)

  7. (g)

    prevent fungal outgrowth and allergic reactions

  8. (h)

    produce vital nutrients like vitamin K and act as antioxidants (Crittenden et al. 2005; Anonymous 2010).

3.2 Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria

The probiotic bacteria used today mainly belong to the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Commonly used strains are L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. johnsonii, etc. Bifidobacteria strains include B. bifidum, B. longum, B. infantis, etc. (Reuter 1997; Holzapfel et al. 1997; Huis in’t Veld and Havenaar 1997; Bonaparte and Reuter 1997). Both lactobacilli and bifidobacteria are important microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and urogenital tract of humans and higher animals (Sgorbati et al. 1995). Many different environmental factors like pH, O2 availability, specific substrates, and bacterial interactions affect distribution of lactobacilli, while age and diet are the main deciding factors for bifidobacteria. The latter are predominantly present in infants; however, with increasing age their number decreases (Finegold et al. 1983). Thus, they belong to the category of generally regarded as safe (GRAS) microorganisms and act as health promoters.

3.3 Strain Selection

The probiotic strain selection for food application depends on their technologic properties, besides the health benefits. The main selection criteria include (1) their survival during transit through stomach and small intestine, (2) adhesion to human GIT, (3) tolerance to oxygen, acid, bile, and salt, and (4) genetic stability (Karovicova et al. 1994, 1999; Holzapfel 2002; Aukrust et al. 1994; Ausco et al. 1998). Moreover, they should produce final product with good taste and acceptable texture, be produced on a large scale, be nonpathogenic and nontoxic, and be safe for technological uses (Adams and Marteau 1995; Donohue and Salminen 1996). Also, changes in food due to microbial metabolism should not affect their stability and functional properties. In addition, their survival throughout manufacturing process, storage, and distribution also must be regularly controlled and monitored. In order to achieve maximum benefits, the selected strain of microorganisms must be present in high numbers, i.e., 109 cells/daily ingested dose. Moreover, the minimum dose must be indicated on the product to confer specific health benefits (Guarner and Schaafsma 1998). Thus, their functional and technological properties are equally important. Nevertheless, food production process affects properties of probiotics, indicating importance of their interactions with other microorganisms as well as with food components. The latter depends on the time when probiotics are added to it, their physiological state, and treatment of probiotics during and after harvesting (Ross et al. 2005).

Synergism of probiotics with other food microorganisms normally results in increased acidification and increase in the number of organisms (Driessen et al. 1982; Radke-Mitchell and Sadine 1986; Perez et al. 1991; Zourari et al. 1992), while inhibition of other microorganisms results due to (1) competition for available nutrients, (2) decrease in redox potential, (3) organic acid production, (4) decrease in pH, and (5) production of bacteriocins, H2O2, biogenic amines, benzoic acid, etc. Their ability to produce bacteriocins helps to extend shelf life and safety of the product (Kalantzopoulos 1997). These biopreservatives can be destroyed by digestive enzymes which is an advantage over classical antibiotics and chemical preservatives. Such strains can be used along with starter cultures to improve the quality of food (Caplice and Fitzerland 1999). However, their antagonistic activity may hinder the development of probiotic food with starters (Joseph et al. 1998). Thus, in order to produce marketable probiotic products, the most important prerequisites are (1) survival of microorganisms in sufficient number in the product, (2) their physical and genetic stability during storage of the product, and (3) expression of their beneficial health effects after consumption. Table 1 enlist commercial probiotic strains sold by different companies in the world.

Table 1 Commercially available probiotic strains (source: http://www.nature.com/ajgsup/journal/v1/n1/fig_tab/ajgsup20127t2.html, Bhadoria and Mahapatra 2011)

4 Preference for Non-dairy Probiotic Food

Usually, health benefits of probiotics are achieved and maintained by consumption of milk-based products or dairy products. However, lactose intolerance, cholesterol content, and allergenic milk proteins are the major limitations of consuming milk-based products (Yoon et al. 2006). Almost 75 % of world population is lactose intolerant (http://www.pcrm.org/health/diets/vegdiets/what-is-lactose-intolerance). It is mainly due to deficiency of one or more enzymes required for lactose digestion. Unfortunately, there is no treatment to improve the enzyme levels. Hence, the symptoms have to be treated by changing the diet containing alternatives to dairy products (Schaafsma 2008). The starter culture in yogurt and cheeses can lessen lactose intolerance in those individuals consuming probiotics through dairy products. These microorganisms produce β-galactosidase in small intestine which assists in lactose digestion (Li et al. 2012). But the effectiveness depends on certain factors like number of cells in the product and amount of lactose produced. In case of milk-sensitive individuals, lactose indigestion results in bloating, cramping, and flatulence that affects the quality of life. Besides, these people are deprived of other health benefits resulting from consumption of probiotics. This emphasizes the need to develop non-dairy products with probiotic benefits. Additionally, worldwide trend of vegetarian diet and traditional and economic reasons in developing countries support the concept of using the substrates other than milk to deliver probiotics.

5 Traditional Non-dairy Probiotic Foods

As mentioned above, lactose intolerance and cholesterol content are the two major drawbacks associated with probiotic dairy products (Yoon et al. 2006). Therefore, traditional non-dairy fermented foods are being examined for their nutritional value as well as analyzed microbiologically. Current research is also focused on developing new or innovative non-dairy probiotic products, their health-promoting effects, sensory qualities, and shelf life. Commercialization of research efforts has led to the manufacture of some of these products on industrial scale. The following section discusses traditional as well as new products and challenges in product development.

5.1 Cereals and Legumes

The traditional cereal-based beverages have been commonly consumed in various countries for a long time mainly because cereal grains are nutritionally important due to their content of proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals, water-soluble fibers, and oligosaccharides (which can act as prebiotics). However, they have only been recently studied for their health benefits. Their microbiological analyses revealed the presence of probiotic microorganisms in these products. Table 2 summarizes traditional probiotic beverages and foods based on cereals and pulses, the probiotic strains identified in them, and their preparation procedure. Besides, wheat, rye, millet, sorghum, and oats have also been used as substrates for fermentation (Angelov et al. 2006). Another widely accepted substrate is soybean. Fermented soymilk and yogurt are popular alternatives to dairy products (Fuchs et al. 2005). Fermentation by probiotic bacteria also helps in preservation of food such as rice wine/beer, rice cakes, fish (Bonaparte and Reuter 1997; Shah et al. 1995), etc., by producing organic acids which control spoilage microorganisms and pathogens as discussed in the previous section. In addition, they produce desirable flavors and improve nutritional value during fermentation of product.

Table 2 Traditional cereal-based fermented products

5.2 Fruits and Vegetables

Other than cereals, fruits and vegetables or their juices are promising substrates to produce non-dairy probiotic foods. Fruit juices fortified with probiotics and prebiotics are gaining importance as fruits have additional advantage of being tasty, healthy, and refreshing and are rich in vitamins, mineral, fibers, and antioxidants (Luckow and Delahunty 2004). Traditionally consumed fruit-based products are Yan-Taozih (pickled peaches), Pobuzihi (fermented cummingcordia), etc. (Table 3). In Turkey, the popular traditional fermented beverage is hardaliye based on grape juice. It also contains mustard seeds which add to the flavor of product. Studies on hardaliye by Arici and Coskun (2001) indicated different strains of lactobacilli in this beverage viz. L. casei, L. paracasei, L. brevis, etc. (Table 3). Oranges, pineapples, grapes, and cranberry are also commonly used substrates. Studies on pineapple and cranberry probiotic juices were published by Sheehan et al. (2007). The authors have reported better survival of lactobacillus strains in orange and pineapple as compared to cranberry. However, the organisms were unable to withstand pasteurization (76 °C for 30 s) and high pressure treatment required for preservation.

Table 3 Traditional fruit- and vegetable-based probiotic products (Swain et al. 2014)

Traditional vegetable-based fermented foods are Kimchi, Saurekraut Soidon, Gundruk, Dakguadong, etc. (Table 3). Mostly, the strains used are L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, and L. delbrueckii. Table 4 summarizes recent studies carried out to produce probiotic non-dairy functional foods using vegetables and fruits as raw material.

Table 4 Innovative non-dairy probiotic functional foods

6 Commercial Products

The technological advances are moving ahead to manufacture traditionally prepared beverages/foods by industrial processes. However, such foods differ in their sensory qualities as compared to the traditional ones, e.g., conventional orange juice is preferred by consumers over its probiotic-fortified counterpart due to its sensory properties; traditional rice wine has a deep and bounty flavor, while industrial wine has light simple flavor (Henneberg 1926). This difference may be attributed to a number of acid-forming bacteria, types of acids, and other metabolites produced. In spite of this, the advantages of probiotics and vegan diets are becoming more appealing. Hence, new plant-based probiotic products are coming in the market, e.g., grainfields whole grain liquid containing beans, oats, maize, rice, alfalfa seed, pearl, barley, linseed, mung beans, wheat, rye grains, and millet. It is fermented with lactobacilli and yeast (Saarela et al. 2006). Other non-dairy probiotic products include vita Biosa, Proviva, Malted barley, Gefilus fruit drinks, etc. Table 5 describes commercially available non-dairy probiotic products and their manufacturers. Majority of their health claims include improvement in digestive system and immune response. Also, they are claimed to be safe for everyday use.

Table 5 Commercial non-dairy probiotic products

7 Sensory Qualities

Most of the probiotics containing non-dairy fermented foods prepared from cereals, fruits, or vegetables usually have favorable texture, flavor, and aroma, e.g., salty taste, fresh carbonated sensation, and crispy texture of kimchi (Dodd and Gasson 1994). Its optimum taste and high vitamin C content of the latter are attained when pH decreases (4–4.5) due to acid fermentation (Metchnikoff 1908). Normally, fermentation results in pleasant acid taste and characteristic aroma due to esters produced from organic acids and alcohols which are produced from sugars (e.g., fructose) (Biacs 1986). In acid-fermented vegetables, a rapid decrease in pH at the beginning of fermentation is of great importance for the quality of end product (Viander et al. 2003). In addition, CO2 produced in acid-fermented vegetables by Leuconostoc mesenteroides inhibits growth of unwanted microorganisms, preventing undesirable softening of vegetables. Also, the anaerobic conditions produced by CO2 help in stabilization of ascorbic acid and natural colors of vegetables (Metchnikoff 1908). Moreover, exopolysaccharides produced by LAB also help to improve rheological and textural properties of food products (Leroy et al. 2002).

Fruit juice-based functional beverages fortified with probiotic microorganisms are dairy free, soy free, wheat free, and vegan. Hence, they are preferred by a large portion of the population. However, it is important to get rid of the off flavors in fermented fruit juices and enhance their sensory acceptability (Granato et al. 2010). For this purpose, addition of fruit juices like pineapple, mango, or passion fruit was found to be useful to improve the aroma and flavor of the final product masking the probiotic off flavors (Luckow and Delahunty 2004). On the other hand, undesirable aromas/flavors might gain consumers’ assertion as indicators of probiotic ingredients or their action (Juttlestad 1998). Alternative to adding probiotic microorganisms directly to the foods is by using them in previously immobilized form which is discussed in the following section. Iron-fortified soy yogurt is found to have suitable hedonic scores for creaminess and flavor. It is also observed that selection of probiotic strains for fermentation purpose affects sensory qualities of soy beverages, e.g., fermented soy beverages produced by using bifidobacteria have better acceptability as compared to that of L. casei. Besides, addition of prebiotics like oligofructose and inulin to soy yogurt was found to increase acceptance index more than 70 % (Hauly et al. 2005). Thus, elevating the palatability of probiotic products is one way to make them more appealing to the consumers, while another means can be making people aware of probiotic health benefits of the product.

8 Additional Health Benefits of Non-dairy Probiotic Functional Foods

8.1 Increase in Nutritional Quality

The nutritional value of a particular food depends on its digestibility and its content of essential nutrients. Both are improved by fermentation, since fermentation increases its nutrient density, the amount, and bioavailability of nutrients. The latter may be achieved by degradation of antinutritional factors, by predigestion of certain food components, and by improving the absorption and uptake of nutrients by the mucosa (Svanberg and Lorri 1997). In addition, fermentation results in the (1) increase in protein solubility and availability of scarce amino acids by as much as 50 %, (2) increase in micronutrient availability because of reduction of phytates and reduction in tannins by as much as 50 %, and (3) decrease in oligosaccharides by as much as 90 % (Nout and Ngoddy 1997) concentration and increase in the availability of proteins and vitamins like thiamine, folic acid, riboflavin, etc. Hence, such types of foods have direct curative effects on consumers of such foods (Steinkraus 1997). LAB also help in increase in iron uptake (Venkatesh 1998). Besides, fermentation may reduce the content of non-digestible plant foods like cellulose, hemicelluloses, polygalacturonic, and glucuronic acids. Breakdown of these compounds may lead to increase in bioavailability of minerals and trace elements (Kalantzopoulos 1997).

8.2 Soy-Based Products

Soy-based products flavored with fruit juices have become very popular as alternatives to dairy products (Champagne et al. 2005). Global market for soy-based probiotic yogurts is increasing annually by 10 %. Various health benefits of such products include (1) weight management, (2) decrease in risk of heart diseases and some cancers (Larkin et al. 2007), (3) good protein source, (4) help in immunomodulation, reduction in levels of –CHO causing gas production in intestine, (5) increase in isoflavone levels, and (6) beneficial to bone health. Besides, soy is in itself a source of vitamins and minerals, antioxidants, and some isoflavones. Hence, traditional soy-based products, e.g., miso, natto, tempe, etc., have better antioxidant activity than the non-fermented ones (Esaki et al. 1994).

8.3 Fruit- and Vegetable-Based Products

Probiotic foods prepared using fruits, vegetables, and cereals also have additional health benefits since fruits and vegetables are themselves considered as health foods due to vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, phenolics, and fibers present in them. Moreover, many products contain additional ingredients used to enhance their flavoring and/or taste. These flavoring agents may also increase nutritional benefits of such foods, e.g., antitumor activities of cabbage and garlic used in kimchi, inhibition of aflatoxin B1 due to red pepper extract (Park et al. 1991), etc. Currently, there are more than 21 different commercial vegetable fermentations in Europe along with a large number of fermented vegetable juices and blends. The fermentations of olives, cucumbers, and cabbage are economically most significant (Caplice and Fitzerland 1999). Nonetheless, inhibitory effects of fermentation metabolites such as bacteriocins are well known (Dave and Shah 1997). Several bacteriocin strains have been isolated from kimchi. The inhibitory effects were observed not only in bacteria but also in fungi, e.g., antifungal compound 3,6-bis(2-methylpropyl)-2,5-piperazinedione was identified as being produced by L. plantarum strain from kimchi (Yang and Chang 2010). Bacteriocins along with organic acids (e.g., lactic acid) play a key role in controlling growth of undesirable and pathogenic organisms, thus avoiding costly treatments and packaging. The large amount of raw material is processed in this way in food industry because of nutritional, physiological, and hygienic aspects of the process (Karovicova et al. 1999).

9 Product Development and Challenges

New product development is always a challenge for both basic and applied research. It is an expensive process and requires detailed knowledge of the product, procedure, and consumers. In food sector, many parameters have to be considered such as sensory and physicochemical properties, extended shelf life, stability, and reasonable price. Careful selection of strains used and good monitoring throughout the manufacturing process are required to control the metabolic products and hence the final pH. So, use of mixed probiotic cultures is preferred which help to increase the growth rates, decrease the fermentation time, and eliminate certain sensory and texture defects and above all improve the nutritional value of the product (Gomes and Malcata 1999).

Another means to use probiotic strains is by adding them to beverages directly into the finished product which may help to retain better viability and functionality (Prado et al. 2008). Probiotic soy products or the products prepared from cereals, vegetables, and fruits are excellent substitutes for dairy products as a source of probiotics. Not only probiotic fermented vegetables but also their by-products have commercial value, e.g., during sauerkraut production, pH of final product is 3.5–3.8, at which cabbage or other vegetables can be preserved for a long time. Sauerkraut brine is an important by-product of cabbage fermentation industry and can be used as a substance for production of carotenoids by Rhodotorula rubra or for β-glucosidase production by Candida wickerhamii (Sim and Hang 1996) for commercial applications.

10 Quality Control

It is evident from the above discussion that non-dairy probiotic beverages are recognized as health drinks with a lot of scope in product development. However, use of probiotic organisms depends on many parameters like processing, storage, chemical composition of food, growth phase of organism, pH, water activity and salt content, interaction with starter culture, food matrix, etc. which affect their ability to survive in the product as well as in the consumers’ GI tract. Hence, quality control of probiotic strains is an important issue especially for monitoring their adhesion, gastric stability, and viability during manufacture, storage, and distribution. For these, some recommended practices are (1) appropriate culture maintenance procedures to reduce the number of passages, (2) use of more than one model to examine stability of the strain, (3) attempts for in vivo quantitative extrapolation of in vitro assays, and (4) studies on interspecies variation with respect to functional properties (Lee and Salminen 1995).

If adhesion properties of probiotic strains are altered during industrial processes their technological traits may also alter. Hence, they should be monitored carefully. Adhesion of probiotic bacteria varies in different in vitro models within the same strains and also shows difference between the strains (Lehto and Salminen 1996, 1997; Tuomola and Salminen 1998). This may be due to difference in surface properties required for adhesion to epithelial cells. Commonly used system is Caco-2 cell line and human ileostomy glycoprotein (Lehto and Salminen 1996, 1997; Tuomola and Salminen 1998).

Viability is another important characteristic as the strain should be viable during manufacture, storage, and after consumption. It is essential that fermented products should contain satisfactory number of active cells at the time of consumption (106 CFU/ml) since minimum therapeutic daily dose is 108–109 viable cells which is equivalent to 100 g of food intake containing 106–107 viable cells/ml (Rasic and Kurmann 1983). The organism should survive in sufficient numbers without any adverse effects on sensory properties of the product and should not increase acidification of product during shelf life (Shah et al. 1995; Roy et al. 1997). Such products must be consumed regularly to achieve and maintain the desirable effects on intestinal microflora. Unfavorable water activity (e.g., cereals, honey, marmalade, chocolate, etc.), pH, bile and salt concentration, and oxygen tension lead to death of bacteria (Vasudha and Mishra 2013). Therefore, acquiring the data for long-term stability to acid/bile is essential (Lee and Salminen 1995; Lee and Wong 1998).

Among the health benefits, hypocholesterolemic potential of probiotics is well known. However, there is lack of dosage response studies to determine minimal effective dosage of probiotics and prebiotics to reduce blood cholesterol levels (Kun et al. 2008). A review of previous studies represents that it depends on strains used and clinical characters of patients. It is necessary to establish clinically effective dosage based on human studies (Larkin et al. 2007). It is clear from the above discussion that viability, stability of probiotic strains (Bonaparte and Reuter 1997; Joseph et al. 1998), and determination of effective dosage are main challenges in research and development of probiotic products. In order to overcome the challenges, microencapsulation technologies have been developed and used successfully in various foods, which increase their viability in cereal- and fruit-based matrices.

11 Technological Innovations

The markets of probiotic products and supplements are increasing worldwide (Playne 1997). Today, there are >70 bifidus and acidophilus containing products worldwide (Shah 2000). Probiotic survival in products is affected by a range of factors including pH, hydrogen peroxide production, oxygen toxicity, storage temperatures, stability in dried or frozen form, and compatibility with traditional starter culture during fermentation (Dave and Shah 1997; Kailasapathy and Rybka 1997). Oxygen plays a major role in the poor survival of probiotic bacteria (Brunner et al. 1993). Hence, it is necessary to prevent their exposure to adverse external conditions. Therefore, the research in the past decade was focused on replacing their carrier food or by improving the protection of acid-sensitive strain via microencapsulation with cellulose acetate phthalate (Rao et al. 1989), n-carrageenan (Dinakar and Mistry 1994), or Ca-alginate (Kim et al. 1996). The former appears to be technologically and commercially most feasible since food carrier has buffering/protective effect and helps in survival in gastric juice.

11.1 Microencapsulation

Microencapsulation helps to separate a core material from its environment until it is released. It protects the unstable core from its environment, thereby improving its stability and viability, extends the core’s shelf life, and provides a sustained and controlled release in specific parts of the gut. The size of capsules may vary from submicron to several millimeters and they can be of different shapes (Franjione and Vasishtha 1995). Most commonly applied technologies are emulsification, coacervation, spray drying, spray cooling, freeze drying, fluid bed coating, and extrusion technologies. More expensive techniques are liposome encapsulation and cyclodextrin encapsulation. Sensitivity of the system to mechanical stress, pH, or different microbial enzymes in the gut facilitates targeted and sustained release.

Microencapsulation using the gentle and nontoxic matrices helps to enhance survival of the bacteria in acid and bile as well as heat. For this, alginate is commonly used due to (1) its non-toxicity, (2) its ability to form gentle matrices with calcium chloride to trap probiotic bacteria, (3) the viability of bacteria following encapsulation, and (4) reversibility of immobilization (Shah and Ravula 2000). Microencapsulation techniques are commonly used for probiotics, vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, etc. Further research in this line will help to develop co-encapsulation technique so as to combine two or more bioactive components for collective effect.

Stress response mechanism in LABs for industrial applications has been studied at the molecular level (Prasad et al. 2003). In L. acidophilus, the genes identified are FiFo-ATPase in acid stress response (Kullen and Klaenhammer 1999) and molecular chaperones groESL and dnaK in heat stress (Shah 2002). Thermotolerance was found to be better in heat-adapted strains of L. paracasei NFB338 (Desmond et al. 2001). Also, Lactobacilli were found to acquire cross-stress tolerance to heat when exposed to mild osmotic stress (Desmond et al. 2001). The authors have also demonstrated enhanced viability of salt-adapted culture as compared to the control one when dried under same conditions. In addition to acid and heat, organisms in fermented foods are also exposed to oxygen stress (Shah 2002). Oxygen content in the product and oxygen permeation through package may affect viability of probiotics in fermented products. Hence, it is necessary to measure oxygen tolerance of probiotic bacteria. Talkwalker and kailashpathy (2004) have published modified Relative Bacterial Growth Ratio (RBGR) method for quantitative measurement of oxygen tolerance, which will help in screening more oxygen-tolerant strains (Talkwalker and kailashpathy 2004). Osp protein was found to be upregulated in O2-tolerant Bifidobacterium strain (Ahn et al. 2001).

11.2 Spray Drying and Freeze Drying

Conventionally, freeze drying or spray drying of probiotic strains is used to make them available in the powder form on a large scale (Holzapfel et al. 2001). Spray drying is the most commonly used microencapsulation method in the food industry since it is economical and flexible, easy to scale up, produces a good quality product, and can be operated on continuous basis with simple equipmentation (Dzieazak 1988). However, further research in this area showed that retaining viability is the challenge due to temperature and osmotic extremes used in this process (Silva et al. 2002). This problem can be overcome either by optimizing the drying technology to reduce the harshness of the treatment or by improving the strains by gene manipulation or mutation. The former has been achieved by proper control and monitoring of processing conditions to produce viable encapsulated cultures of desired particle size, e.g., O’Riordan et al. (2001) have found that 100 °C inlet temperature and 45 °C of outlet temperature are suitable to produce microspheres of bifidobacteria with gelatinized modified starch as coating material. Meng et al. (2006) have reviewed that the stress responses in probiotic strains can have a remarkable effect on their ability to survive processing such as freeze drying, spray drying, and during gastric transit. In such cases, overexpressing heat shock proteins like GroEsL or addition of thermoprotectants to drying medium is advantageous (Desmond et al. 2004). Stress induced by temperature changes, phase changes, drying, or a combination tends to damage cell membrane and proteins. To overcome cell injury or death due to heat and dehydration, thermoprotectants have been added to media prior to drying, e.g., trehalose (Conrad et al. 2000), non-fat milk solids (Corcoran et al. 2004), prebiotics (Corcoran et al. 2005), granular starch (Crittenden et al. 2001), gum acacia (Desmond et al. 2004), etc. The addition of gum acacia in the drying medium resulted in 1000-fold increase in stability of dried L. paracasei NF13C 338 during powder storage at 15 °C and 30 °C (Lian et al. 2002). Hundred fold increase in viability was also observed when exposed to porcine gastric juice compared to control spray-dried culture (Desmond et al. 2002). Similarly, addition of cryoprotectants like inulin improves viability during freeze drying. Freeze-dried L. bulgaricus survived better at −20 °C for more than 10 months when grown in the presence of fructose, lactose, or mannose. Incorporation of glucose, fructose, or sorbitol in drying medium also resulted in better survival at low temperature (Carvalho et al. 2004).

11.3 Emulsion and Phase Separation

Most of the literature reported on the encapsulation of probiotic bacteria has used the emulsion technique to produce small amount of capsules. The capsules or beads are formed in a two-step procedure involving dispersion and hardening. The dispersion can be performed either by extrusion or by emulsification (Groboillot et al. 1994). The former involves projecting an emulsion core and coating material through a nozzle at high pressure. If the droplets are formed in a controlled manner, the technique is known as prilling. Beads can be produced on a large scale by using multinozzle systems, rotating disk atomizers, or by the jet cutting technique (Heinzen 2002).

11.4 Other Technologies

Another technology reported is vacuum impregnation to have beneficial effects of probiotics with fruits and vegetables. In this, apple cylinders were impregnated either with commercial apple juice containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or with whole milk or apple juice containing 107 or 108 cfu/ml of Lactobacillus casei. Impregnated apple samples were air dried at 40 °C and stored at room temperature for 2 months to increase stability and to assure fruit preservation. The number of L. casei viable cells in dried and stored product was more than 106 CFU/g which is similar to that in commercial dairy products (Vos et al. 2010).

12 Future Perspectives

Non-dairy probiotic products have a huge potential for food industry. These functional foods may be further explored through the development of new ingredients, processes, and technologies in order to improve their nutritional and sensory appeal. The key areas for research and development in non-dairy food products are raw materials used, sensory qualities, microencapsulation technologies, and strain improvement. The studies on novel or different matrices/carrier foods will help to increase the variety of non-dairy probiotic foods to offer a wide choice to consumers. The main reason for this is occurrence of non-dairy allergies linked to soya, gluten, and vegetables. Enhancement in sensory appeal of probiotic foods will ensure its consumption in the quantity and frequency to achieve anticipated health benefits. Also, consumers must be convinced by clear and trustworthy health claims so as to further increase the market of these functional foods.

In order to achieve the claimed health benefits, sustained viability and stability of the culture are significant. Hence, the technology of microencapsulation needs to develop with more precise machinery, capsule, and better delivery systems to protect the strains from external stress. In this regard, nano-encapsulation may get importance in near future to develop designer probiotic bacterial preparations for delivery to certain parts of GIT where they can interact with specific receptors. Such probiotic preparations may act as de novo vaccines and help in immunomodulation. Thus, research and development in this area will improve the delivery and sustained release of viable cells. Moreover, this has to be coupled with in vivo studies using human subjects (Kaliasapathy 2002).

Efforts for strain development are required to obtain mildly acidifying, less fastidious strains with sustained probiotic potential for application as starters or as supplements for food fortification. Besides, the advances in genetic engineering techniques will lead to the designing of more efficient strains and also introduce new functions in same strains. Earlier examples of such studies are expression of S. mutans surface protein Ag in L. lactis (Iwaki et al. 1990), murine interleukin 10 (IL-10) in recombinant L. lactis (Steidler et al. 2000), etc. Research and development in this area will result in live recombinant vaccines (Seegers 2002) using food grade bacteria (GRAS). However, studies on safety and efficacy of engineered strains and original strains are highly desirable. This is particularly necessary for children, pregnant women, elderly people, and immunocompromised people.

In addition to the technological aspects, future efforts should be directed to understand in detail the mechanisms of their health-promoting effects, increase in public awareness, and their applications in human and veterinary foods so as to gain their health benefits as per the recommended dosage, thereby reducing the health care cost.