Abstract
Over the past decade, corneal transplantation has evolved rapidly from full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty toward partial-thickness or lamellar keratoplasty. Lamellar corneal surgery is in continuous evolution, which requires an understanding of the structural, biomechanical, and histological characteristics of corneal layers involved. In this chapter, we describe the anatomy and physiology of the human cornea in order to provide the structural basis for understanding the newly developed techniques. The chapter provides detailed information on morphological, histological, ultrastructural, and physiological characteristics of the five anatomical corneal layers, i.e., epithelium, Bowman’s layer, corneal stroma consisting of regularly arranged collagen fibrils interspersed with keratocytes, Descemet’s membrane, and endothelial cells, in relation to corneal transplantation. In particular, it outlines regional and age-related differences in structure, biomechanical properties, mechanisms of wound healing and restoration of corneal transparency, causes of stromal haze, cleavage planes and interface characteristics in lamellar transplantation techniques, and reasons for graft failure. Patterns of corneal innervation and the molecular mechanisms of antiangiogenic and immune privileges, which determine the success of allogeneic corneal transplantation, are described in addition.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Epithelium
- Bowman’s layer
- Stroma
- Descemet’s membrane
- Endothelium
- Anatomy
- Histology
- Electron microscopy
- Corneal innervation
- Immune privilege
The cornea is a transparent avascular connective tissue covering the front part of the eye. It is one of the most highly innervated tissues in the body, protects the interior eye from penetration by foreign bodies and pathogens, and contributes, together with the tear film, two-thirds of the eye’s refractive power. It is nourished and provided with oxygen anteriorly by tears and posteriorly by the aqueous humor. It has to maintain the intraocular pressure and to withstand the forces applied by the extraocular muscles during eye movement. Corneal shape and curvature, which are relevant for refraction, are achieved by the specific arrangement of collagen lamellae in the stroma, and corneal transparency, which is critically important for vision, is the result of many factors including avascularity of the corneal tissue, the integrity of the corneal epithelium, and the regular arrangement of the extracellular and cellular components of the stroma, which in turn depends on the state of hydration regulated by the corneal endothelium [18].
Corneal transplantation remains the mainstay treatment for patients with corneal blindness. The success of allogeneic corneal transplantation benefits from the immunologically privileged state of the cornea [55]. Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) has been the gold standard for corneal transplantation for almost a century. Over the past decade, corneal transplantation has evolved rapidly from full-thickness PKP toward partial-thickness or lamellar keratoplasty to only remove and replace damaged or diseased layers of the cornea allowing more rapid visual rehabilitation and reduced rates of rejection [4, 63, 69]. Current developments in lamellar keratoplasty include deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for anterior corneal disorders [3], such as keratoconus or stromal scars, as well as Descemet’s stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK, DSAEK) and Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for posterior corneal disorders, such as Fuchs’ corneal endothelial dystrophy [47, 61]. Lamellar corneal surgery is in continuous evolution, which requires an understanding of the structural, biomechanical, and histological characteristics of corneal layers involved. In this chapter, we describe the anatomy and physiology of the human cornea in order to provide the structural basis for the subsequent chapters on corneal transplantation techniques.
Gross Anatomy and Physiology
In adults, the cornea has a horizontal diameter of 11.0–12.0 mm, a vertical diameter of 10.0–11.0 mm, and a thickness of approximately 500–550 μm at the center, which gradually increases to 600–800 μm toward the periphery [18]. The cornea has an aspheric anterior surface being steeper in the center and flatter in the periphery. Average refractive power is 43.25 diopters, average radius of curvature is 7.8 mm, and the corneal index of refraction is 1.376. It is composed of five anatomical layers, i.e., corneal epithelium, Bowman’s layer, corneal stroma, Descemet’s membrane, and corneal endothelium (Fig. 2.1a). Besides these conventional layers of the cornea, an additional pre-Descemet’s stromal layer has been recently described [19], which has, however, been subsequently disproved by a multicenter study [66].
Confocal microscopy with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) II and Rostock Cornea Module can be used for in vivo imaging of all anatomical layers and corneal cell types including nerve plexi and immune cells (Fig. 2.2).
Corneal Epithelium
The epithelial surface of the cornea represents the physical barrier to the outer environment and an integral part of the smooth tear film–cornea interface that is critical for the refractive power of the eye. It is responsible for protecting the eye against loss of fluid and invasion of foreign bodies and pathogens and for absorbing oxygen and nutrients from the tear film.
The corneal surface is covered by a stratified, nonkeratinizing, squamous epithelium, about 50 μm in thickness, comprising 5–7 cell layers collectively. It can be structured into three layers, the superficial or squamous cell layer, the suprabasal wing cell layer, and the basal columnar cell layer (Fig. 2.1b) [18, 60]. Desmosomes promote strong adhesion between cells of all epithelial layers. The superficial layer is formed by 2–3 layers of flat polygonal cells, which form intercellular tight junctions to provide an effective barrier and numerous surface microvilli, which increase the cellular surface area and enhance oxygen and nutrient uptake from the tear film. The microvillar glycocalyx coat interacts with and helps to stabilize the pre-corneal tear film, which is composed of three layers: a superficial lipid layer to provide protection from evaporation, an aqueous layer providing nutrients and oxygen supply to the corneal epithelium, and a basal mucin layer, which interacts closely with the epithelial cell glycocalyx to allow lubrication of the ocular surface and spreading of the tear film with each eyelid blink [26, 70]. The tear film also supplies immunological and growth factors that are critical for epithelial health, proliferation, and repair, and defects in tear film, e.g., in neurotrophic keratopathy after corneal surgery, can cause epithelial wound healing problems and surface inflammation. The wing cell layer is formed by 2–3 layers of wing-shaped cells which have laterally interdigitated cell membranes with numerous desmosomes (Fig. 2.2a). The basal layer consists of a single layer of columnar cells (Fig. 2.2b), which are attached to the underlying basement membrane by hemidesmosomes (Fig. 2.1c). The epithelial basement membrane has a critical role in corneal wound healing, because defects in this delicate layer allow penetration of growth factors from the epithelium into the stroma [71]. Corneal epithelial adhesion to Bowman’s layer is maintained by an anchoring complex including anchoring fibrils (type VII collagen) and anchoring plaques (type VI collagen) (Fig. 2.1c) [25]. Abnormalities in these anchoring complexes may result clinically in recurrent corneal erosions or nonhealing epithelial defects.
Besides epithelial cells, there are numerous nerve endings in between the cells (Fig. 2.2c), which exert important trophic influences on the corneal epithelium and which have been estimated to amount to a density of 7000 nociceptors per mm2, which is 400 times more than in the skin [52]. Mechanical stress to these nerves, such as in bullous keratopathy, can therefore cause tremendous pain. Furthermore, resident MHC class II-expressing cells, i.e., CD11c+-dendritic cells and CD207+-Langerhans cells, were identified in the human basal epithelium and anterior stroma (Fig. 2.2d), which are capable of rapidly mobilizing to the site of epithelial trauma and viral infection within the cornea [37]. The corneal epithelium itself exerts strong anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic properties, and transplantation of donor corneas without the epithelium, e.g., after abrasion, leads to increased postoperative inflammation and neovascularization [17].
Corneal epithelial cells routinely undergo apoptosis and desquamation from the surface. This process results in complete turnover of the corneal epithelial layer every 5–7 days as deeper cells replace the desquamating superficial cells in an orderly, apically directed fashion. Two populations of cells, the basal epithelial cells and limbal stem cells, help renew the epithelial surface [7]. The epithelial stem cells and their progenitors are located at the bottom of the palisades of Vogt at the corneoscleral limbus [15]. Depletion of this stem cell reservoir, e.g., after chemical burns, can cause severe ocular surface disease and significant visual deterioration, a condition known as limbal stem cell deficiency [1]. In these cases, epithelium of conjunctival phenotype may replace the corneal surface. Transplantation of limbal autografts or allografts [35] and ex vivo expanded limbal epithelial stem cells are established therapeutic strategies to regenerate the damaged corneal surface [67].
The corneal epithelium responds to injury in three phases, i.e., migration, proliferation, and differentiation with reattachment to the basement membrane [80]. Following injury, cells adjacent to an epithelial defect migrate to cover the wound within few hours. Following wound closure, basal epithelial and limbal stem cells proliferate and differentiate to repopulate the epithelium. In the final phase, hemidesmosomes replace focal contacts in order to anchor the basal epithelial cells tightly to the basement membrane and stroma. If the basement membrane remained intact, a tight adhesion is established in only a few days. If the basement membrane was damaged, its repair can take up to 6 weeks. During this time, the epithelial attachment to the newly deposited basement membrane tends to be unstable and weak, and the regenerated epithelium is very susceptible to damage. Following PKP, re-epithelialization is usually observed within 1 week, although morphological abnormalities, detected by specular microscopy, may persist up to 6 months postoperatively [74]. Corneal grafts showed some recovery of the subbasal nerve plexus, at least in the graft periphery, but not complete recovery of function [68].
Bowman’s Layer
Bowman’s layer represents the most anterior, acellular portion of the corneal stroma (Fig. 2.1d). It is approximately 8–12 μm thick and structurally composed of randomly oriented collagen fibrils, 20–25 nm in diameter, consisting of collagen types I, III, V, and VI (Fig. 2.1e) [77]. Its thickness has been reported to decline with age by 0.06 μm per year, thus losing one-third of its thickness between 20 and 80 years of age [23]. Unmyelinated nerve axons penetrate Bowman’s layer to terminate within the epithelium. The functional role of Bowman’s layer is not completely known, but it is believed to serve as a barrier that protects corneal stroma and nerves from traumatic injury. In addition, it has been suggested to ensure epithelial anchorage to the corneal stroma and helps to maintain the shape and tensile strength of the cornea. Bowman’s layer also functions as an important UV shield protecting the inner eye and a nearly insurmountable barrier against the invasion of epithelial tumors into the corneal stroma [60].
When disrupted, Bowman’s layer does not regenerate but forms a scar. Therefore, diseases or surgical procedures leading to defects in Bowman’s layer increase the risk for corneal ruptures and ectasias. On the other hand, sutures have to extend through Bowman’s layer to ensure tight and effective suturing [17].
Corneal Stroma
The stroma is the thickest layer of the cornea measuring approximately 500 μm in width and represents a dense avascular connective tissue of remarkable and unique regularity. It is composed of regularly arranged bundles of collagen fibrils embedded in a glycosaminoglycan-rich extracellular matrix, which are interspersed with flattened fibroblast-like cells termed keratocytes [18]. Collagen organization in the stroma is crucial to corneal functions such as light transmission and maintenance of corneal curvature, tensile strength, and rigidity [27]. The individual collagen fibrils, being mainly composed of collagen types I and V, are extremely uniform in diameter measuring about 25–30 nm [38, 44] and are organized into approximately 250–300 2 μm thick sheets or lamellae. Regular spacing of fibrils within these lamellae is maintained by interactions of collagens with proteoglycans forming bridges between the fibrils [53]. The major proteoglycans of the stroma are keratan sulfate proteoglycans, such as keratocan and lumican, and chondroitin/dermatan sulfate proteoglycans, such as decorin [27, 48], which also regulate stromal hydration by means of their ability to bind water molecules. The collagenous lamellae form a highly organized ply, with adjacent lamellae being oriented at right angles, although there are organizational differences in the collagen bundles between anterior and posterior stroma [45]. In the anterior third of the stroma, lamellae are oriented more obliquely, mediating a tighter cohesive strength and rigidity, which appears particularly important in maintaining corneal curvature [51], whereas in the posterior two-thirds, lamellae run in parallel to the corneal surface. These differences in stromal collagen organization may also explain why the anterior stroma resists changes to stromal hydration much better [46] and why surgical dissection in a particular plane is easier in the posterior depths of the stroma, e.g., in DALK. Moreover, the peripheral stroma is thicker than the central stroma, and the collagen fibrils may change direction to form a circumferentially oriented network, which is thought to be pivotal in maintaining corneal stability and curvature, as they approach the limbus [45]. Any disturbance of this fine-tuned arrangement, either by deposition of abnormal extracellular matrix, e.g., deposition of mucopolysaccharides in macular corneal dystrophy, or the irregular arrangement of collagen fibrils in stromal scars, can cause corneal opacity.
The collagen lamellae are interspersed with flattened stellate keratocytes, which are interconnected by gap junctions and arranged in a circular, corkscrew pattern forming a coherent network (Fig. 2.2e) [50, 59]. The density of keratocytes in the anterior stroma is 20,000–24,000 cells/mm2 and the density decreases posteriorly. Keratocytes are metabolically active cells involved in synthesis and turnover of extracellular matrix components, i.e., collagen molecules and glycosaminoglycans. They contain water-soluble proteins, corneal “crystallins,” which appear to be responsible for reducing backscatter of light from the keratocytes and for maintaining corneal transparency [32]. In addition, sensory nerve fibers are present in the anterior stroma, which are cut during PKP leading to a mild neurotrophic keratopathy [68], and MHC class II antigen-presenting cells, which seem to migrate out of the cornea during organ preservation, thereby explaining the reduced rates of immune rejections of longer organ-cultured grafts [17].
Following injury to the stroma, e.g., in PKP, keratocytes adjacent to the wound undergo apoptosis [71, 78, 80]. About 24 h after wounding, the remaining keratocytes begin to proliferate and transform into activated fibroblasts, which migrate into the wound region and produce extracellular matrix components, a process that may last up to 1 week. Inflammatory cells, including monocytes, granulocytes, and lymphocytes, infiltrate the stroma from the limbal blood vessels. Fibroblasts transform into myofibroblasts, which contract the wound and secrete extracellular matrix, a process which may last up to 1 month. Deposition of large amounts of disorganized extracellular matrix may lead to loss of corneal transparency causing stromal haze. Matrix remodeling by repopulating keratocytes thereby restoring transparency is the last phase of stromal wound healing and can last for years [71]. In penetrating or lamellar keratoplasty, a rather complete wound healing response is usually noted at donor-recipient interfaces. However, abnormal collagen fiber size and arrangement, indicating incomplete stromal wound remodeling and persistence of fibrotic scar tissue, have been observed within the graft margin after PKP [11]. Similarly, the presence of fibrocellular tissue, probably derived from myofibroblasts, has been found in the graft–host interface in about 20 % of corneas after DSAEK failure [79]. Therefore, stroma-to-stroma interface haze may occur in DALK or DSAEK and can degrade visual acuity, even if the microkeratome or femtosecond laser is used to achieve a smooth resection [4].
Recently, the existence of a novel, previously unrecognized layer of the pre-Descemet’s corneal stroma, which can be separated by air injection into the stroma during DALK using big-bubble technique, has been reported [19]. This distinct layer was reported to measure about 10 μm in width and was characterized to lack any keratocytes and to show a pronounced immunostaining for collagen types III, IV, and VI [20]. However, the description of this hypothesized new anatomic layer was critically commented on in the literature and eventually refuted by a detailed ultrastructural reinvestigation of the human corneal stroma [66]. The findings of this three-center study provided evidence that there is no distinctive acellular pre-Descemet’s stromal zone justifying the term “layer” apart from a thin (0.5–1.0 μm) intermediary “Bowman’s-like zone” of randomly arranged collagen fibers at the Descemet’s membrane–stromal interface (Fig. 2.1g). The collagen fibers of this intermediary layer partly extend into Descemet’s membrane serving a connecting function (Fig. 2.1h). Stromal keratocytes were found to approach Descemet’s membrane up to 1.5 μm (mean 4.97 ± 2.19 μm) in the central regions and up to 4.5 μm (mean 9.77 ± 2.90 μm) in the peripheral regions of the cornea. The intrastromal cleavage plane after pneumodissection, which seemed to occur at multiple stromal levels along rows of keratocytes offering the least resistance to mechanical forces, was obviously determined by the variable distances of keratocytes to Descemet’s membrane. Consistently, the residual stromal sheet separated by air injection into the stroma varied in thickness from 4.5 to 27.5 μm, being usually thinnest in the central and thickest in the peripheral portions of the bubble (Fig. 2.3d). This phenomenon has been well documented as “residual stroma” in previous studies, providing evidence that the big-bubble technique in DALK is not consistently a Descemet-baring technique [31, 36, 43].
Descemet’s Membrane
Descemet’s membrane represents the thickened (10–12 μm), specialized basement membrane of the corneal endothelium consisting of collagen types IV, VIII, and XVIII and non-collagenous components including fibronectin, laminin, nidogen, and perlecan as well as dermatan, keratan, heparan, and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans [64]. Apart from providing structural integrity of the cornea, Descemet’s membrane has been suggested to play a role in several important physiological processes including corneal hydration, endothelial cell differentiation and proliferation, and maintenance of the corneal curvature. It is composed of an anterior banded (fetal) layer, approx. 3 μm in thickness, and a posterior nonbanded (postnatal) layer that gradually thickens with age reaching up to 10 μm in elderly individuals (Fig. 2.1f) [33, 54]. In the periphery, Descemet’s membrane forms wart-like excrescences (Hassall-Henle warts) and merges into the trabecular meshwork beams. The thickened fusion site, known as Schwalbe’s line, is a gonioscopic landmark that defines the end of Descemet’s membrane and the beginning of the trabecular meshwork.
Descemet’s membrane is attached to the corneal stroma by a narrow (about 1 μm thick) transitional zone of amorphous extracellular matrix termed the “interfacial matrix,” which contains increased amounts of adhesive glycoproteins such as fibronectin (Fig. 2.1f, g) [64]. Connecting collagen fibers projecting from the “Bowman’s-like” stromal layer into this interfacial matrix zone further promote anchorage (Fig. 2.1h). Extracellular matrix complexes formed by keratoepithelin (transforming growth factor β-induced) and collagen type VI are also involved in maintaining adherence at Descemet’s membrane–stroma interface. Adhesive forces appear to be slightly stronger in the central than in the peripheral parts of the cornea. Nevertheless, Descemet’s membrane can be separated relatively easily from the adjacent stroma, which is utilized during DMEK surgery by a transient splitting of the physiological interface between the interfacial matrix of Descemet’s membrane and posterior stroma in both the donor’s and recipient’s corneas (Fig. 2.3a, b). The high optical and structural quality of this interface remains after reattachment of the donor’s Descemet’s membrane to the recipient’s corneal stroma, allowing for superior functional results after DMEK when compared to other lamellar transplantation techniques producing a stroma–stroma interface [72]. Although Descemet’s grafts can be manually prepared from donor corneas with a high level of reproducibility (98 %) using an appropriate technique [40], a small percentage of donor corneas (2 %) reveals individual tissue properties, which may complicate and even prevent proper Descemet’s stripping due to exceptionally strong adhesiveness of Descemet’s membrane to the posterior stroma [65]. The morphological cause underlying the resistance of Descemet’s membrane to proper stripping appears to be ultrastructural or biochemical abnormalities along Descemet’s membrane–stroma interface, and any attempts to strip Descemet’s membrane result in its lamellar splitting, mostly between anterior banded and posterior nonbanded layers (Fig. 2.3c). Lamellar splitting can also occur during stripping of recipient Descemet’s membrane, particularly in patients with Fuchs’ dystrophy leaving residual fetal Descemet’s membrane retained on the recipient DSAEK or DMEK interface [13, 49]. This phenomenon may be one frequent cause for failure of graft adherence to the recipient posterior corneal surface [76].
DMEK is dependent on the biomechanical elastic properties of Descemet’s membrane, which scrolls up with the endothelium on the outside upon removal from the stroma. Age, which is known to correlate with thickness of Descemet’s membrane [54], has a significant impact on the degree of scrolling. Thinner grafts from younger donors (<50 years) have a tendency for pronounced curling after stripping making subsequent unfolding in the recipient’s anterior chamber more difficult. Thus, corneas from donors older than 55 years of age are preferably used for DMEK graft preparation [41]. The exact reasons why grafts adhere to the recipient bed are not known. Physical, biochemical, and physiological mechanisms such as endothelial pump function have been proposed. It has been shown that the use of organ-cultured grafts exhibiting modified biochemical properties and a larger removal of Descemet’s membrane of the host promote graft adhesion [42, 73].
Although intraoperative manipulation may be a frequent cause of primary graft failure, the majority of failed DMEK grafts revealed ultrastructural signs of preoperative endothelial dysfunction, i.e., inclusions of abnormal collagenous material within Descemet’s membrane proper [14]. Due to its continued appositional growth with age [54], Descemet’s membrane provides a lifelong record of pathological events and endothelial function [33], and any deposition of abnormal extracellular material is indicative of previous stress or damage to the endothelial cells (Fig. 2.3e, f). Thus, a preexisting subclinical corneal endothelial dysfunction, as indicated by abnormal inclusions within Descemet’s membrane, may have contributed to primary DMEK failure [14]. In contrast, a posterior fibrous layer, mainly consisting of collagen types I and IV and fibronectin, may be produced and deposited on the posterior surface of an otherwise normal Descemet’s membrane by attenuated endothelial cells that underwent transdifferentiation into (myo)fibroblast-like cells (Fig. 2.3g) [75]. The formation of an abnormal posterior collagenous layer is the result of a final common pathway following endothelial dysfunction and damage, including intra- or postoperative trauma, and has been also reported to contribute to failed lamellar and penetrating grafts [28, 39].
Corneal Endothelium
The innermost layer of the cornea, the corneal endothelium, is a single layer of cuboidal cells, which have a critical role in maintaining corneal hydration and thus transparency (Fig. 2.1f). The cells, which form a hexagonal honeycomb-like mosaic when viewed from the posterior surface (Fig. 2.2f), are 5–6 μm in height and 18–20 μm in diameter. Some cells have apical cilia, which play a role in morphogenesis and repair of the endothelial monolayer [8]. Their lateral surfaces are highly interdigitated and possess apical junctional complexes comprising both gap and tight junctions forming a leaky barrier and allowing paracellular movement of fluid and substances from the aqueous into the cornea. The basal surface of the endothelium contains hemidesmosomes that promote adhesion to Descemet’s membrane. The endothelial layer is responsible for dehydration of the cornea and maintenance of corneal transparency by pumping water out of the corneal stroma [24]. The dehydration process is described by the ”pump-leak hypothesis,” in which leakage of solutes and nutrients from aqueous humor to superficial layers of the cornea is counteracted by pumping water in the opposite direction. This passive bulk fluid movement is fueled by the energy-requiring processes of transporting ions to generate the osmotic gradient. The most important ion transport systems are the membrane-bound Na,K-ATPase and the intracellular carbonic anhydrase, producing a net flux of ions from the stroma to the aqueous humor [9].
The number of endothelial cells decreases with age, trauma, inflammation, surgery, and disease processes such as Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. Endothelial cell density at birth is approximately 3500–4000 cells/mm2, decreasing gradually at an average rate of 0.6 % per year to 2500 cells/mm2 at age 50 and 2000 cells/mm2 at age 80 [6]. Endothelial cells of the human cornea have a low proliferative capacity and lost cells are replaced by spreading of adjacent cells resulting in an increase in cell size (polymegathism) and an increase in variation of cell shape (pleomorphism). With increasing cell loss, the pump and barrier functions of the endothelium may be compromised. A density lower than 500 cells/mm2 may lead to endothelial decompensation and corneal edema with concomitant loss of transparency. Endothelial cell loss following penetrating and lamellar keratoplasty has been reported to average about 70 % in PKP, about 50 % in DSEK, and about 40 % in DMEK at 5 years [21]. However, remaining endothelial cells can also migrate along a density gradient and cover denuded areas [30].
In contrast to the in vivo situation, human endothelial cells retain their proliferative capacity in vitro and can proliferate in response to growth stimulation factors [34]. Thus, the use of ex vivo cultured human corneal endothelial cells may represent a potential future alternative to full-thickness or lamellar keratoplasty in the replacement of defective corneal endothelium. Preclinical studies applying corneal endothelial cell therapy are giving promising results [29, 56, 58, 62].
Corneal Innervation
The cornea is densely innervated by unmyelinated sensory nerve fibers derived from the trigeminal nerve, mainly via the long ciliary nerves. About 70 main nerve bundles enter the peripheral cornea in a radial manner and move centrally in the anterior one-third of the stroma. They divide into smaller branches and penetrate Bowman’s layer to form the subepithelial or subbasal nerve plexus at the interface between Bowman’s layer and the corneal epithelium (Fig. 2.2c). Individual fibers penetrate all epithelial layers and terminate in the superficial layers. It is estimated that there are approx. 7000 nociceptors per mm2 in the human corneal epithelium [52]. The density of nerve endings per unit area is 400 times higher than in the skin, making the cornea one of the most densely innervated tissues in the body. In conformity with the density of nerve endings, corneal sensitivity increases from the limbus to the central cornea. Corneal nerves release neuropeptides, such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which have important trophic functions on the corneal epithelium and stimulate epithelial wound healing [22]. Loss of corneal sensory innervation can lead to neurotrophic keratopathy, involving epithelial defects, poor wound healing, and ulcers [10]. Corneal nerves, which can be visualized using confocal microscopy with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) II and Rostock Cornea Module, show morphological alterations associated with a reduction in central corneal sensation early after DMEK [12]. However, a complete recovery of corneal nerve density and function up to preoperative values occurs within 4–10 months. In contrast, subbasal nerve density does not recover to normal values throughout 30 years after PKP [57].
Corneal Immune Privilege
Since corneal avascularity is an essential factor for corneal transparency, the cornea has developed strategies to maintain avascularity, a phenomenon termed “corneal antiangiogenic privilege” [5, 17]. Several antiangiogenic factors have been shown to contribute to corneal avascularity, including pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), thrombospondins, and receptors binding and inactivating angiogenic growth factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The strong expression of VEGF receptor 3 on the corneal epithelium, which is normally expressed on vascular endothelial cells, seems to be especially potent.
The cornea has also developed strategies to minimize inflammatory reactions, a phenomenon termed “corneal immune privilege.” The success of allogeneic corneal transplantation benefits from this property, which is attributed to multiple anatomical, physiological, and immunoregulatory factors [55]. For instance, absence of blood and lymph vessels in the graft bed is essential for graft survival. Thus, the molecular mechanisms of immune privilege are similar to those mediating avascularity, e.g., thrombospondin-1 is involved in both processes. Corneal epithelial and stromal cells secrete soluble factors, including VEGFR-2 and endostatin, which inhibit lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis, thereby maintaining immune privilege [2]. The corneal endothelium also expresses membrane-bound molecules, such as Fas ligand (FasL), which defend against immune effector cells including T cells and components of the complement cascade. Another mechanism contributing to the success of allogeneic corneal transplantation is “anterior chamber associated immune deviation (ACAID),” which is defined as the systemic downregulation of an immune response against antigens injected into the anterior chamber of the eye [55]. As a consequence, immune reactions against, e.g., donor endothelial antigens are less destructive.
Nevertheless, the central corneal stroma and epithelium are endowed with significant numbers of resident MHC class II-negative inflammatory and antigen-presenting cells, including dendritic cells and epithelial Langerhans cells as well as macrophages. These cells become activated and increase in numbers after contact lens use and inflammation (Fig. 2.2d), causing higher injection rates in inflamed high-risk recipient beds [16].
References
Ahmad S. Concise review: limbal stem cell deficiency, dysfunction, and distress. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1:110–5.
Albuquerque RJ, Hayashi T, Cho WG, Kleinman ME, Dridi S, Takeda A, Baffi JZ, Yamada K, Kaneko H, Green MG, Chappell J, Wilting J, Weich HA, Yamagami S, Amano S, Mizuki N, Alexander JS, Peterson ML, Brekken RA, Hirashima M, Capoor S, Usui T, Ambati BK, Ambati J. Alternatively spliced vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 is an essential endogenous inhibitor of lymphatic vessel growth. Nat Med. 2009;15:1023–30.
Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty: surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet’s membrane. Cornea. 2002;21:374–83.
Arenas E, Esquenazi S, Anwar M, Terry M. Lamellar corneal transplantation. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57:510–29.
Azar DT. Corneal angiogenic privilege: angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors in corneal avascularity, vasculogenesis, and wound healing (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:264–302.
Bahn CF, Glassman RM, MacCallum DK, Lillie JH, Meyer RF, Robinson BJ, Rich NM. Postnatal development of corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:44–51.
Beebe DC, Masters BR. Cell lineage and the differentiation of corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1815–25.
Blitzer AL, Panagis L, Gusella GL, Danias J, Mlodzik M, Iomini C. Primary cilia dynamics instruct tissue patterning and repair of corneal endothelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:2819–24.
Bonanno JA. Molecular mechanisms underlying the corneal endothelial pump. Exp Eye Res. 2012;95:2–7.
Bonini S, Rama P, Olzi D, Lambiase A. Neurotrophic keratitis. Eye (Lond). 2003;17:989–95.
Boote C, Dooley EP, Gardner SJ, Kamma-Lorger CS, Hayes S, Nielsen K, Hjortdal J, Sorensen T, Terrill NJ, Meek KM. Quantification of collagen ultrastructure after penetrating keratoplasty – implications for corneal biomechanics. PLoS One. 2013;8, e68166.
Bucher F, Hos D, Matthaei M, Steven P, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM. Corneal nerve alterations after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Cornea. 2014;33:1134–9.
Chen ES, Shamie N, Terry MA, Phillips PM, Wilson DJ. Retention of host embryonic descemet membrane in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2009;28:351–3.
Cirkovic A, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Weller JM, Kruse FE, Tourtas T. Clinical and ultrastructural characteristics of graft failure in DMEK: 1-year results after repeat DMEK. Cornea. 2015;34:11–7.
Cotsarelis G, Cheng SZ, Dong G, Sun TT, Lavker RM. Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell. 1989;57:201–9.
Cruzat A, Witkin D, Baniasadi N, Zheng L, Ciolino JB, Jurkunas UV, Chodosh J, Pavan-Langston D, Dana R, Hamrah P. Inflammation and the nervous system: the connection in the cornea in patients with infectious keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:5136–43.
Cursiefen C, Kruse FE, Naumann GOH. Special anatomy and pathology in intraocular microsurgery: cornea and limbus. In: Naumann GOH, Holbach L, Kruse FE, editors. Applied pathology for ophthalmic microsurgeons. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 97–130.
DelMonte DW, Kim T. Anatomy and physiology of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:588–98.
Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, Gray T, Lowe J. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1778–85.
Dua HS, Faraj LA, Branch MJ, Yeung AM, Elalfy MS, Said DG, Gray T, Lowe J. The collagen matrix of the human trabecular meshwork is an extension of the novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:691–7.
Feng MT, Price MO, Miller JM, Price Jr FW. Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1116–21.
Garcia-Hirschfeld J, Lopez-Briones LG, Belmonte C. Neurotrophic influences on corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 1994;59:597–605.
Germundsson J, Karanis G, Fagerholm P, Lagali N. Age-related thinning of Bowman’s layer in the human cornea in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:6143–9.
Geroski DH, Matsuda M, Yee RW, Edelhauser HF. Pump function of the human corneal endothelium. Effects of age and cornea guttata. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:759–63.
Gipson IK. Adhesive mechanisms of the corneal epithelium. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1992;202:13–7.
Gipson IK. Distribution of mucins at the ocular surface. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:379–88.
Hassell JR, Birk DE. The molecular basis of corneal transparency. Exp Eye Res. 2010;91:326–35.
Heindl LM, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Cursiefen C, Bachmann BO, Hofmann-Rummelt C, Kruse FE. Myofibroblast metaplasia after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:1019–23.
Honda N, Mimura T, Usui T, Amano S. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using cultured corneal endothelial cells in a rabbit model. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1321–6.
Jacobi C, Zhivov A, Korbmacher J, Falke K, Guthoff R, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Evidence of endothelial cell migration after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:537–42.
Jafarinasab MR, Rahmati-Kamel M, Kanavi MR, Feizi S. Dissection plane in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique. Cornea. 2010;29:388–91.
Jester JV, Moller-Pedersen T, Huang J, Sax CM, Kays WT, Cavangh HD, Petroll WM, Piatigorsky J. The cellular basis of corneal transparency: evidence for ‘corneal crystallins’. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:613–22.
Johnson DH, Bourne WM, Campbell RJ. The ultrastructure of Descemet’s membrane. I. Changes with age in normal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1942–7.
Joyce NC. Proliferative capacity of corneal endothelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 2012;95:16–23.
Kenyon KR, Tseng SC. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:709–22.
Kim SY, Muftuoglu O, Hogan RN, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP, Mootha VV. Histopathology and spectral domain OCT findings of pneumatic-assisted dissection in DALK. Cornea. 2012;31:1288–93.
Knickelbein JE, Buela KA, Hendricks RL. Antigen-presenting cells are stratified within normal human corneas and are rapidly mobilized during ex vivo viral infection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:1118–23.
Komai Y, Ushiki T. The three-dimensional organization of collagen fibrils in the human cornea and sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2244–58.
Kremer I, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR, Eagle Jr RC. Retrocorneal fibrous membranes in failed corneal grafts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:478–83.
Kruse FE, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, et al. A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30:580–7.
Kruse FE, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Tourtas T. Optimizing outcomes with Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:325–34.
Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Donor tissue culture conditions and outcome after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:1007–18.
McKee HD, Irion LC, Carley FM, Jhanji V, Brahma AK. Residual corneal stroma in big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a histological study in eye-bank corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:1463–5.
Meek KM, Leonard DW. Ultrastructure of the corneal stroma: a comparative study. Biophys J. 1993;64:273–80.
Meek KM, Boote C. The organization of collagen in the corneal stroma. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:503–12.
Meek KM, Leonard DW, Connon CJ, Dennis S, Khan S. Transparency, swelling and scarring in the corneal stroma. Eye (Lond). 2003;17:927–36.
Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25:987–90.
Michelacci YM. Collagens and proteoglycans of the corneal extracellular matrix. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003;36:1037–46.
Mondloch MC, Giegengack M, Terry MA, Wilson DJ. Histologic evidence of retained fetal layer of the descemet membrane after presumed total removal for endothelial keratoplasty: a possible cause for graft failure. Cornea. 2007;26:1263–6.
Müller LJ, Pels L, Vrensen GF. Novel aspects of the ultrastructural organization of human corneal keratocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:2557–67.
Müller LJ, Pels E, Vrensen GF. The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of corneal curvature. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:437–43.
Müller LJ, Marfurt CF, Kruse F, Tervo TM. Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76:521–42.
Müller LJ, Pels E, Schurmans LR, Vrensen GF. A new three-dimensional model of the organization of proteoglycans and collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:493–501.
Murphy C, Alvarado J, Juster R. Prenatal and postnatal growth of the human Descemet’s membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:1402–15.
Niederkorn JY. Corneal transplantation and immune privilege. Int Rev Immunol. 2013;32:57–67.
Okumura N, Kinoshita S, Koizumi N. Cell-based approach for treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction. Cornea. 2014;33 Suppl 11:S37–41.
Patel SV, Erie JC, McLaren JW, Bourne WM. Keratocyte and subbasal nerve density after penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:180–9.
Peh GS, Beuerman RW, Colman A, Tan DT, Mehta JS. Human corneal endothelial cell expansion for corneal endothelium transplantation: an overview. Transplantation. 2011;91:811–9.
Poole CA, Brookes NH, Clover GM. Confocal imaging of the human keratocyte network using the vital dye 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003;31:147–54.
Poothullil AM, Gipson IK. Cornea: structural features and wound healing. In: John T, editor. Lamellar corneal surgery. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2008. p. 3–14.
Price Jr FW, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:339–45.
Proulx S, Bensaoula T, Nada O, Audet C, d’Arc Uwamaliya J, Devaux A, Allaire G, Germain L, Brunette I. Transplantation of a tissue-engineered corneal endothelium reconstructed on a devitalized carrier in the feline model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2686–94.
Rajan MS. Surgical strategies to improve visual outcomes in corneal transplantation. Eye. 2014;28:196–201.
Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Bachmann BO, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Characterization of the cleavage plane in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1950–7.
Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T, Cursiefen C, Zenkel M, Rössler K, Kruse FE. Reproducibility of graft preparations in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1769–77.
Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T, Torricelli AA, Singh A, Gonzalez S, Mei H, Deng SX, Wilson SE, Kruse FE. Ultrastructure of the posterior corneal stroma. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:693–9.
Shortt AJ, Secker GA, Notara MD, Limb GA, Khaw PT, Tuft SJ, Daniels JT. Transplantation of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial stem cells: a review of techniques and clinical results. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52:483–502.
Stachs O, Zhivov A, Kraak R, Hovakimyan M, Wree A, Guthoff R. Structural-functional correlations of corneal innervation after LASIK and penetrating keratoplasty. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:159–67.
Tan DT, Dart JK, Holland EJ, Kinoshita S. Corneal transplantation. Lancet. 2012;379:1749–61.
Tiffany JM. The normal tear film. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:1–20.
Torricelli AA, Wilson SE. Cellular and extracellular matrix modulation of corneal stromal opacity. Exp Eye Res. 2014;129:151–60.
Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:1082–90.
Tourtas T, Schlomberg J, Wessel JM, Bachmann BO, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Kruse FE. Graft adhesion in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal of host’s Descemet membrane. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:155–61.
Tsubota K, Mashima Y, Murata H, Yamada M, Sato N. Corneal epithelium following penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:257–60.
Waring 3rd GO. Posterior collagenous layer of the cornea. Ultrastructural classification of abnormal collagenous tissue posterior to Descemet’s membrane in 30 cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:122–34.
Weller JM, Tourtas T, Kruse FE, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Fuchsluger T, Bachmann BO. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty as treatment for graft failure after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:1050–7.
Wilson SE, Hong JW. Bowman’s layer structure and function: critical or dispensable to corneal function? A hypothesis. Cornea. 2000;19:417–20.
Wilson SE, Chaurasia SS, Medeiros FW. Apoptosis in the initiation, modulation and termination of the corneal wound healing response. Exp Eye Res. 2007;85:305–11.
Zhang Q, Randleman JB, Stulting RD, Lee WB, Stone DU, Kozarsky AM, Grossniklaus HE. Clinicopathologic findings in failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:973–80.
Zieske JD. Extracellular matrix and wound healing. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12:237–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlötzer-Schrehardt, U., Kruse, F.E. (2016). Anatomy and Physiology: Considerations in Relation to Transplantation. In: Hjortdal, J. (eds) Corneal Transplantation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24052-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24052-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24050-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24052-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)