Abstract
Click models have become an essential tool for understanding user behavior on a search engine result page, running simulated experiments and predicting relevance. Dozens of click models have been proposed, all aiming to tackle problems stemming from the complexity of user behavior or of contemporary result pages. Many models have been evaluated using proprietary data, hence the results are hard to reproduce. The choice of baseline models is not always motivated and the fairness of such comparisons may be questioned. In this study, we perform a detailed analysis of all major click models for web search ranging from very simplistic to very complex. We employ a publicly available dataset, open-source software and a range of evaluation techniques, which makes our results both representative and reproducible. We also analyze the query space to show what type of queries each model can handle best.
A. Chuklin—Currently at Google Switzerland.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Chapelle, O., Metzler, D., Zhang, Y., Grinspan, P.: Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In: CIKM 2009, pp. 621–630 (2009)
Chapelle, O., Zhang, Y.: A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking. In: WWW 2009, pp. 1–10 (2009)
Chuklin, A., Markov, I., de Rijke, M.: Click Models for Web Search. Morgan & Claypool (2015)
Chuklin, A., Serdyukov, P., de Rijke, M.: Click model-based information retrieval metrics. In: SIGIR 2013, pp. 493–502 (2013)
Craswell, N., Zoeter, O., Taylor, M., Ramsey, B.: An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In: WSDM 2008, pp. 87–94 (2008)
Dou, Z., Song, R., Wen, J.R., Yuan, X.: Evaluating the effectiveness of personalized web search. IEEE TKDE 21(8), 1178–1190 (2009)
Dupret, G., Liao, C.: A model to estimate intrinsic document relevance from the clickthrough logs of a web search engine. In: WSDM 2010, pp. 181–190 (2010)
Dupret, G.E., Piwowarski, B.: A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. In: SIGIR 2008, pp. 331–338 (2008)
Guo, F., Liu, C., Kannan, A., Minka, T., Taylor, M., Wang, Y.M., Faloutsos, C.: Click chain model in web search. In: WWW 2009, pp. 11–20 (2009)
Guo, F., Liu, C., Wang, Y.M.: Efficient multiple-click models in web search. In: WSDM 2009, pp. 124–131 (2009)
Hofmann, K., Schuth, A., Whiteson, S., de Rijke, M.: Reusing historical interaction data for faster online learning to rank for IR. In: WSDM 2013, pp. 183–192 (2013)
Hofmann, K., Whiteson, S., de Rijke, M.: A probabilistic method for inferring preferences from clicks. In: CIKM 2011, pp. 249–258 (2011)
Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 20(4), 422–446 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grotov, A., Chuklin, A., Markov, I., Stout, L., Xumara, F., de Rijke, M. (2015). A Comparative Study of Click Models for Web Search. In: Mothe, J., et al. Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9283. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24027-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24027-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24026-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24027-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)