Abstract
This chapter will review the role of UNESCO and in particular the International Bioethics Committee (IBC) in the field of bioethics over the past two decades. Three questions will be addressed. The first question is what has been achieved. It will be argued that more important than contributing to the adoption of normative instruments the IBC has played a leading role in promoting a broader conception of bioethics that is more appropriate to current processes of globalization. Another question is why an organization such as UNESCO is involved, and should be more involved in the global development of bioethics. The last question that will be discussed concerns the challenges that will lie ahead in the next 20 years.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bankowski, Z., and J.F. Dunne. 1982. History of the WHO/CIOMS project for the development of guidelines for the establishment of ethical review procedures for research involving human subjects. In Human experimentation and medical ethics, Proceedings of the XVth CIOMS Round Table Conference Manila, 13-16 September 1981, ed. Z. Bankowski and N. Howard-Jones, 441–452. Geneva: CIOMS.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 1983. Principles of biomedical ethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
DuBose, E.R., R. Hamel, and L.J. O’Connell (eds.). 1994. A matter of principles? Ferment in U.S. bioethics. Valley Forge: Trinity Press International.
Farmer, P. 2005. Pathologies of power. Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ganguli Mitra, A. 2013. A social connection model for international clinical research. American Journal of Bioethics 13(3): W1–W2.
Gillon, R. (ed.). 1994. Principles of health care ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Gracia, D. 1999. History of medical ethics. In Bioethics in a European perspective, ed. H.A.M.J. ten Have and B. Gordijn, 17–50. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Huxley, J. 1946. UNESCO. Its purpose and its philosophy. Preparatory Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Paris: UNESCO.
Potter, V.R. 1971. Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Potter, V.R. 1988. Global bioethics: Building on the Leopold legacy. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Rothman, D.J. 1991. Strangers at the bedside. A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York: Basic Books.
Ten Have, H. 2011. Foundationalism and principles. In The SAGE handbook of health care ethics: Core and emerging issues, SAGE handbook series, ed. Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, and Eric Meslin, 20–30. London: SAGE Publications.
Ten Have, H. 2012. Potter’s notion of bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22(1): 59–82.
Ten Have, H., and B. Gordijn. 2013. Global bioethics. In Handbook of global bioethics, ed. A.M.J. Henk, H. ten Have, and B. Gordijn, 3–18. Dordrecht: Springer Publisher.
UNESCO. 1993. Study submitted by the Director-General concerning the possibility of drawing up an international instrument for the protection of the human genome. General Conference, 27th Session (27 C/45). http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0009/000954/095428eo.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
ten Have, H. (2016). Globalizing Bioethics Through, Beyond and Despite Governments. In: Bagheri, A., Moreno, J., Semplici, S. (eds) Global Bioethics: The Impact of the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee. Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22650-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22650-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22649-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22650-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)