Skip to main content

The Author’s Body: Almodóvar, Film Theory, and Embodiment

  • Chapter
Bodies, Boundaries and Vulnerabilities

Part of the book series: Crossroads of Knowledge ((CROKNOW))

  • 682 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter turns attention to the porosity of bodily boundaries in the films of Pedro Almodóvar. Considering the trope of the body in relation to the function of authorship in film studies, it takes the authorship of Almodóvar as a case in point. The chapter addresses both the representation of bodies in Almodóvar’s films, as gendered, transformable, vulnerable, permeable, lost, and resurrected, and the formation of Almodóvar’s corpus as a vulnerable body in itself. It brings out how Almodóvar’s invocation of bodily themes at the level of film structure effects a splitting and doubling of each individual film that contain stories within stories, identities within identities, and bodies within bodies. Such splitting and doubling also bring about a blurring of filmic boundaries, between an inside and outside of the film’s narrative structure. The author calls attention to a motion of self-differentiation within each individual film body on the level of structure, story, and character in which inside and outside are blurred and elliptical, dividing the work from within. This blurring and splitting applies not just to individual films, but also to the work as a whole, troubling its relation to the author and the boundaries between and within individual films and the full corpus of films.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The problem of “enunciation” in film theory is generally discussed in terms of the film “apparatus” rather than the author and thereby linked to an ideological critique. However, Kaja Silverman notes that even in theories of film’s ideological apparatus, the author “makes the occasional surreptitious return.” For Silverman, the author is inseparable from the film’s representations and constituted through them; Silverman’s author “would in fact be nothing outside cinema—an author ‘outside’ the text who would come into existence as a dreaming, desiring, self-affirming subject only through the inscription of an author ‘inside’ the text” (1988, 201, 202. Emphasis in original).

  2. 2.

    Something like this noncoincidence of the self is expressed in embodiment theory, which often seeks to explain the role of consciousness in reversible terms. The self is produced in a state of internal/external awareness and experiences consciousness from a divided perspective. Thus, for Lisa Folkmarson Käll, “My very self-awareness is predicated on the fact that I never quite coincide with myself, but as one, embody two aspects in reversible relation, thereby continuously differentiating myself from myself” (2009, 115).

  3. 3.

    In his essay, Freud explains that the perception of “uncanniness” is both an experiential moment and a moment of return (“heimlich/unheimlich”) to the mother’s body, a familiar inside that has also become alien, strange.

References

  • All About My Mother. (1999). Dir. Pedro Almodóvar. Perf. Cecilia Roth, Marisa Paredes. El Deseo SA, Renn Productions, France 2 Cinéma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almodóvar, P. (1996). In F. Strauss (Ed.), Almodóvar on Almodóvar, (Rev. ed., trans: Baignères, Y., & Richard, S.). New York: Faber and Faber, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bad Education. (2004). Dir. Pedro Almodóvar. Perf. Gael Garcia Bernal, Fele Martínez. El Deseo SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, L., & Dutoit, U. (2009). Almodóvar’s girls. In B. Epps & D. Kakoudaki (Eds.), All about Almodóvar: A passion for cinema (pp. 241–266). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervantes, M. D. (2003). Don Quixote (trans: Rutherford, J.). London: Penguin Classics. First published 1604–1605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, T., Patricia, W., & Mazaj, M. (Eds.). (2011). Critical visions in film theory. Boston/New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2, The time-image (trans: Tomlinson, H., & Galeta, R.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1988). Limited inc. (trans: Weber, S.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1959). The uncanny (trans: Rivière, J.). In Sigmund Freud: collected papers (pp. 368–407) New York: Basic Books. First Published 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, V. (2009). Bad education: Fictional autobiography and meta-film noir. In B. Epps & D. Kakoudaki (Eds.), All about Almodóvar: A passion for cinema (pp. 429–445). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Käll, L. F. (2009). A being of two leaves: On the founding significance of the lived body. In J. Bromseth, L. F. Käll, & K. Mattsson (Eds.), Body claims (pp. 110–133). Uppsala: Center for Gender Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1977). The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience (trans: Sheridan, A.). In Ècrits: a selection (pp. 1–7) New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law of Desire. (1987). Dir. Pedro Almodóvar. Perf. Eusebio Poncela, Carmen Maura, Antonio Banderas. El Deseo SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L. U. (2000). The skin of the film: Intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, L. (1989). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In Visual and other pleasures (pp. 14–26). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, K. (1988). The acoustic mirror: The female voice in psychoanalysis and cinema. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (1991). Address of the eye: A phenomenology of film experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (2004). Carnal thoughts: Embodiment and moving image culture. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press. eBook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talk to Her. (2002). Dir. Pedro Almodóvar. Perf. Javier Cámara, Darío Grandinetti, Leonor Watling, Rosiario Flores. El Deseo SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Flower of My Secret. (1996). Dir. Pedro Almodóvar. Perf. Marisa Paredes, Juan Echanove, Carme Elias. El Deseo SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truffaut, F. (1976). A certain tendency of the French cinema. In B. Nichols (Ed.), Movies and methods (Vol. 1, pp. 224–237). Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • What Have I Done to Deserve This? (1984). Dir. Pedro Almodóvar. Perf. Carmen Maura, Gonzalo Suárez, Luis Hostalot. Kaktus Producciones Cinématográficas, Tesaura SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollen, P. (1972). Signs and meaning in the cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. First published 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown. (1988). Dir. Pedro Almodóvar. Perf. Carmen Maura, Antonio Banderas, Julieto Serrano. El Deseo SA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper owes much to two sources. First, I would not have thought of writing it but for Jeffrey Whitman, an undergraduate at Northeastern University, with whom I spent a summer studying all of Almodóvar’s films. It was a pleasure to discuss the films with Jeff, who not only feels totally comfortable disagreeing with me, but who also, unlike his teacher, understands Spanish. I learned more than I could ever consciously acknowledge from his work. In addition, I wish to thank the Body/Embodiment Group at Northeastern and Uppsala Universities, for whose volume this paper was written. In particular the group’s leaders, Lisa Folkmarson Käll, Linda Blum, Ann Grenell, and Lihua Wang, have been excellent role models. The problems and flaws in this paper I acknowledge my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Fleche .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fleche, A. (2016). The Author’s Body: Almodóvar, Film Theory, and Embodiment. In: Käll, L. (eds) Bodies, Boundaries and Vulnerabilities. Crossroads of Knowledge. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22494-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22494-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22493-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22494-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics