Skip to main content

Corporate Governance and Corruption: A Comparative Study of Southeast Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia

Part of the book series: Development and Governance ((DG,volume 2))

Abstract

The weak corporate governance framework in Indonesia, as in other countries in Southeast Asia, was deemed a crucial factor in deepening the financial and economic crisis in the late 1990s. Over a decade after the 1997 Asian financial crisis, Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries have made substantial governance reforms. The reform measures of the institutional framework, both in the public and corporate sectors, were intended to transform Indonesia into a clean, transparent, and accountable country. While the reforms have resulted in increased political stability, improved government effectiveness, and a more conducive investment climate, corruption remains a major concern in Indonesia. This study aims to evaluate how corporate governance mechanisms can reduce the opportunities for corruption. By utilizing agency theory, we argue that a strong corporate governance institutional framework helps to reduce a country’s level of corruption. We focus attention on three components of corporate governance mechanisms, i.e., shareholder rights, the quality of the board of directors (BoD), and appropriate accounting and auditing standards, including transparency standards. In an attempt to strengthen corporate governance standards and practices in Indonesia, we conducted a comparative study among Southeast Asian middle-income countries, i.e., Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. We rely on accessible secondary data such as corporate governance codes, laws, and regulations. Our study concludes that the Indonesian corporate governance institutional framework is less stringent compared to Malaysia and Thailand. This condition provides a favorable environment for corruption to persist because the standards and practices are less demanding and the companies do not necessarily have to comply with the existing regulatory framework.

The first author is the original researcher and serves as the author for correspondence, the remaining authors are promoters and supervisors listed in alphabetical order who also have contributed to this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Several laws have been introduced to tackle corruption such as Law No. 31 of 1999 on Eradicating Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001, Law No. 28 of 1999 on State Officials who are Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism, and Law No. 15 of 2002 on Criminal Acts of Money Laundering.

  2. 2.

    NCCG was established under a Ministerial Decree from the Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Finance and Industry No. KEP-31/M.EKUIN/06/2000. Then, in 2004 the NCCG was transformed into the National Committee on Governance (or KNKG), composed of the Public Governance Sub-Committee and the Corporate Governance Sub-Committee under a Ministerial Decree No. KEP-49/M.EKON/11/2004.

  3. 3.

    In an attempt to enhance the enforcement of law process, at the end of 2003 the government established the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (or “KPK”), an independent body which has special authorities to prevent, combat, and prosecute acts of corruption. The KPK has made significant performance since its establishment. Between 2004 and 2012, the KPK handled 283 corruption cases involving a total of 337 politicians, government officials, local leaders, and private sector executives (KPK 2012 Annual Report).

  4. 4.

    In this paper, we do not consider the enforcement of law. It might be possible that strong regulations do not necessarily imply a good implementation in practice.

  5. 5.

    Corporate sustainability is a concept which integrates the role of corporations not only in terms of corporate economic activities but also in the environmental and societal goals (van Marrewijk 2003; Berger et al. 2007). In other words, corporations have a responsibility to create financial profits for the shareholders on the one hand, and on the other hand, they contribute to the well-being of stakeholders, including society and the environment. It is also known as the triple-bottom-line notion (Hubbard 2009; Painter-Morland 2006).

  6. 6.

    Corporate governance code generally consists of principles and standards which are voluntary with regard to its implementation; it defines the structure and mechanism how corporations are governed. According to the Financial Reporting Council (2012), the code is not a rigid set of rules, and corporations are not necessarily strictly bound by the code. Thus, it is contrary to laws and regulations which impose mandatory rules including enforcement.

  7. 7.

    The legal framework here refers to those issued until December 31, 2013.

  8. 8.

    The World Bank classifies the low-/middle-/high-income economies based on their Gross National Income (GNI) per capita. For the year 2013, low-income economies are defined as countries with GNI per capita ≤US$1045; middle-income economies between US$1046 and US$12,745; and high-income economies ≥US$12,746 (http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/a-short-history).

  9. 9.

    Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan (Bapepam-LK). http://www.bapepam.go.id/pasar_modal/index.htm. Since January 1, 2013, the role of Bapepam-LK has been replaced by the Indonesia Financial Services Authority or Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) - http://www.ojk.go.id/en/. The process of transition from Bapepam-LK to OJK, however, takes about one year. All capital market regulations in this article are based on those set by Bapepam-LK.

  10. 10.

    Stock Exchange of Thailand. http://www.set.or.th/en/.

  11. 11.

    Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG). http://knkg-indonesia.com/home/.

  12. 12.

    Minority Shareholders Watchdog Group. http://www.mswg.org.my/.

  13. 13.

    We had tried to search any information regarding the ISSI; however, we did not obtain the ISSI’s web site and news about its activities.

  14. 14.

    Djankov et al. (2008) have revised the previous measure of shareholder protection (formerly known as the anti-director rights index) which was first introduced by La Porta et al. (1998), after receiving a constructive critique from a legal scholar (Spamann 2009).

  15. 15.

    Bursa Malaysia. http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1A, pp. 385–464)., Chapter 6 Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2004). Fraud and corporate executives: Agency, stewardship and broken trust. Journal of Forensic Accounting, V, 109-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B., & de Lange, P. (2004). Enron: an examination of agency problems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15, 751–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asean Federation of Accountants. (2013). Annual Report. [Online] Available from http://www.aseanaccountants.org/resource-2-AFA%20Annual%20Report.html.

  • Asean Community in Figures 2011 (ACIF 2011). (2012). Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA). (2012). CG Watch 2012: Market Rankings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank. (2013). ASEAN corporate governance scorecard: Country reports and assessments 2012–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baek, J. S., Kang, J. K., & Park, K. S. (2004). Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from the Korean financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 71, 265–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsam, S. (1998). Discretionary accounting choices and CEO compensation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15, 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2007). Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: Developing markets for virtue. California Management Review, 49(4), 132–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2011) Profile: Thaksin Shinawatra. [Online] Available from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13891650. Accessed 26 Jan 2014.

  • Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(2), 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability, and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 885–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodjonegoro, B. (2009). Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: Its impacts on regional economic development and fiscal sustainability. In Coen, J. G. H. & Ramstedt, M. (Eds.), Decentralization and regional autonomy in Indonesia: Implementation and challenges. Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohara, A. K., Mitchell, N. J., & Mittendorff, C. F. (2004). Compound democracy and the control of corruption: A cross-country investigation. Policy Study Journal, 32(4), 481–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan, S., Emanuel, D., Hay, D., & Wong, N. (2008). Non-audit fees, long-term auditor-client relationships and earnings management. Accounting and Finance, 48, 181–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., & Nee, V. G. (2000). Comment: Controversies and evidence in the market transition debate. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1174–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, R. W., & Child, T. B. (2013). Changes to the ownership and control of East Asian corporations between 1996 and 2008: The primacy of politics. Journal of Financial Economics, 107, 494–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core, J., Holthausen, R., & Larcker, D. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti, G., Pesenti, P., & Roubini, N. (1998). What caused the Asian currency and financial crisis? Part I: A macroeconomic overview. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Working Paper No. 6833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A, Jr. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28, 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rosa, D., Gooroochurn, N., & Gorg, H. (2010). Corruption and productivity firm-level evidence from the BEEPS survey. Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank No. 5348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, A., & Stulz, R. (2007). Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance? Journal of Financial Economics, 86(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, A. C., Krieckhaus, J., & Lusztig, M. (2006). Corruption, democracy, and economic growth. International Political Science Review, 27(2), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D. B. (2005). Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review, 80(2), 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, S., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fich, E., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? Journal of Finance, 61(2), 681–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council. (2012). The UK Corporate Governance Code.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors’ fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 35(1), 71–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R., & Li, X. (2004). Characteristics of a firm’s information asymmetry between insiders and outsiders. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37, 229–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E.L., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Legal origins. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1193–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyimah-Brempong, K. (2002). Corruption, economic growth and income inequality in Africa. Economics of Governance, 3, 183–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (2002) Governance and growth: Lesson from the Asian economic crisis. Asia-Pacific Economic Literature, 13(2), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indonesia’s Code of Good Corporate Governance. (2006). National Committee on Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakarta Post. (2014). KPK to probe son of Sentul City boss. [Online] Available from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/06/19/kpk-probe-son-sentul-city-boss.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2014.

  • Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A., & Friedman, A. (2000). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 141–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., & Peng, M.W. (2011). Principal-principal conflicts during crisis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 683–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 351–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juliarto, A., Tower, G., van der Zahn, M., & Rusmin, R. (2013). Managerial ownership influencing tunneling behaviour. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 7(2), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanchanapoomi, N. (2005). Accelerating corporate governance reform in Thailand: The benefits of private reform mechanisms. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 15, 165–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2013) The economics of foreign bribery: Evidence from FCPA enforcement actions. Paper on SSRN. [Online] Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1573222. Accessed: 9 Feb 2013.

  • Kessing, S. G., Konrad, K. A., & Kotsogiannis, C. (2007). Foreign direct investment and the dark side of decentralization. Economic Policy, 22(49), 7–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbro, M. B. (2002). A cross-country empirical investigation of corruption and its relationship to economics, cultural, and monitoring institutions: An examination of the role of accounting and financial statements quality. Journal of Accounting and Auditing and Finance, 17, 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10, 703–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochanova, A. (2012). The Impact of bribery on firm performance: Evidence from central and eastern European countries. Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). (2012). Annual Report. [Online] Available from http://www.kpk.go.id/images/pdf/laptah/LAPTAH_KPK_2012.pdf.

  • Kumar, R., & Debroy, B. (1999) The Asian crisis: An alternate view. The Asian Development Bank Economic Staff Paper Series. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 15(1), 222–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 58, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D. F., & Richardson, S. A. (2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 625–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (1999). The debate on the causes of the Asian crisis: Crony capitalism versus international system failure. International Politics and Society, 2. [Online] Available from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/ipg/ipg-1999-2/artlee.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2013.

  • Lemmon, M. L., & Lins, K. V. (2003). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 58(4), 1445–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 411–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. S. (2003). Relation-based versus rule-based governance: An explanation of the East Asian miracle and Asian crisis. Review of International Economics, 11(4), 651–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. W., & Hwang, M. I. (2010). Audit quality, corporate governance, and earnings management: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 14, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malagueno, R., Albrecht, C., Ainge, C., & Stephens, N. (2010). Accounting and corruption: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 13(4), 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance. (2012). Suruhanjaya Sekuriti (Securities Commission Malaysia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C. (2012). Regulating for value creation: What is the link between market confidence and contractual freedom? OECD: Corporate Governance, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meon, P. G., & Sekkat, K. (2005). Does corruption grease and sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice, 122, 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, T. (2002). A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 64, 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Wolfenson, D., & Yeung, B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economics Literature, 43, 655–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. (2004). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M. (2006). Triple bottom-line reporting as social grammar: Integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate codes of conduct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picur, R. D. (2004). Quality of accounting, earnings opacity and corruption. Review of Accounting and Finance, 3(1), 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peisakhin, L., & Pinto, P. (2010). Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India. Regulation and Governance, 4, 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Accounting and Auditing, Indonesia (2011). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Accounting and Auditing, Malaysia (2012a). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Accounting and Auditing, Thailand (2008). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Corporate Governance, Indonesia (2010). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Corporate Governance, Malaysia (2012b). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Corporate Governance, Thailand (2012c). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riahi-Belkaoui, A., & AlNajjar, F. K. (2006). Earnings opacity internationally and elements of social, economic and accounting order. Review of Accounting and Finance, 5(3), 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government, causes, consequences and reform. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.  

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, G.G., & Frank, B. (2003). Deterrence versus intrinsic motivation: experimental evidence on the determinants of corruptibility. Economics of Governance, 4, 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seker, M., & Yang, J. S. (2012). How bribery distorts firm growth: Differences by firm attributes. Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank No. 6046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafeim, G. (2013). Firm competitiveness and detection of bribery. Harvard Business School Working Paper. 14–012, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V. D. (2004). Board of director characteristics, institutional ownership, and fraud: Evidence from Australia. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuto, A. (2007). Executive compensation and earnings management: Empirical evidence from Japan. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 16, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spamann, H. (2009). The "antidirector rights index" revisited. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), 467–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J., & Fisman, R. (2007). Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 83(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, A. K. (2010). Corporate governance and economic growth. Economics Bulletin, 30(4), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Principles of Good Corporate Governance for Listed Companies. (2012). Stock Exchange of Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, H., Szewczyk, S. H., & Varma, R. (2004). Board composition and corporate fraud. Financial Analysts Journa, 60(3), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R. (1995). The Economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 11(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, C., Laing, D., & Phillip, J. M. (2002). Internal and external governance mechanisms: Their impact on the performance of large UK public companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29, 579–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, SJ. (2000). How taxing is corruption on international investors? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000). Corporate governance: A framework for implementation. Iskander, M.R., and Chamlou, N. (Eds.), pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2013). The Worldwide Governance Indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home

  • Wu, X. (2005) Corporate governance and corruption: A cross-country analysis. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institution, 18(2), pp. 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Governing the corporation in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 196–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nureni Wijayati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wijayati, N., Hermes, N., Holzhacker, R. (2016). Corporate Governance and Corruption: A Comparative Study of Southeast Asia. In: Holzhacker, R., Wittek, R., Woltjer, J. (eds) Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia. Development and Governance, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22434-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics