Abstract
Learners’ step-by-step solutions can offer insight into their misunderstandings. Because of the difficulty of automatically interpreting freeform solutions, educational technologies often structure problem solving into particular patterns. Hypothesizing that structured interfaces may frustrate some learners, we conducted an experiment comparing two interfaces for solving equations: one requires users to enter steps in an efficient sequence and insists each step be mathematically correct before the user can continue, and the other allows users to enter any steps they would like. We find that practicing equation solving in either interface was associated with improved scores on a multiple choice assessment, but that users who had the freedom to make mistakes were more satisfied with the interface. In order to make inferences from these more freeform data, we develop a Bayesian inverse planning algorithm for diagnosing algebra understanding that interprets individual equation solving steps and places no restrictions on the ordering or correctness of steps. This algorithms draws inferences and exhibits similar confidence based on data from either interface. Our work shows that inverse planning can interpret freeform problem solving, and suggests the need to further investigate how structured interfaces affect learners’ motivation and engagement.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Anthony, L.: Developing handwriting-based Intelligent Tutors to enhance mathematics learning. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University (2008)
Anthony, L., Yang, J., Koedinger, K.R.: Evaluation of multimodal input for entering mathematical equations on the computer. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1184–1187. ACM (2005)
Baker, C.L., Saxe, R.R., Tenenbaum, J.B.: Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition 113(3), 329–349 (2009)
Board, C.: Accuplacer\(^{\textregistered }\) sample questions for students. https://accuplacer.collegeboard.org/students (Accessed 15 October 2014)
Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: The effect of feedback control on learning to program with the lisp tutor. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 796–803 (1990)
Falmagne, J.C., Doignon, J.P.: Learning spaces. Springer (2011)
Gilks, W., Richardson, S., Spiegelhalter, D.J. (eds.): Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall, Suffolk (1996)
Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J., Hadley, W., Mark, M.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 30–43 (1997)
Kramer, A.: Symja library - Java symbolic math system (2010–2014). https://bitbucket.org/axelclk/symja_android_library/wiki/Home
Lund, A.: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsletter 8(2) (2001)
Mattern, K.D., Packman, S.: Predictive validity of ACCUPLACER scores for course placement: A meta-analysis. Tech. Rep. 2009–2, College Board, New York, NY, December 2009
Payne, S., Squibb, H.: Algebra mal-rules and cognitive accounts of error. Cognitive Science 14(3), 445–481 (1990)
Rafferty, A.N., Griffiths, T.L.: Diagnosing algebra understanding via Bayesian inverse planning. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 351–352 (2014)
Rafferty, A.N., LaMar, M.M., Griffiths, T.L.: Inferring learners’ knowledge from their actions. Cognitive Science (in press)
Razzaq, L.M., Heffernan, N., Feng, M., Pardos, Z.: Developing fine-grained transfer models in the Assistment system. Journal of Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning 5(3), 289–304 (2007)
Sleeman, D.: An attempt to understand students’ understanding of basic algebra. Cognitive Science 8(4), 387–412 (1984)
Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement learning. MIT Press (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rafferty, A.N., Griffiths, T.L. (2015). Interpreting Freeform Equation Solving. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)