Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

2.1 History, Principles, and Technique

Gonioscopy is a clinical biomicroscopic technique that allows the structures in the anterior chamber angle to be visualized. The angle was first visualized by Alexios Trantas in1907 with a digital pressure with a direct ophthalmoscope using positive lens powers [1]. Salzmann introduced modern gonioscopy by the first goniolens in 1914 [2, 3]. Many other authors such as Curran, Koeppe, Troncoso, Barkan, Sugar, Schaffer, Scheie, Goldmann, and Spaeth et al. contributed to the comprehension of the angle and its role in the different types of glaucoma [412].

The angle of the anterior chamber cannot be visualized directly during a routine clinical examination. It can be observed only by gonioscopy, which is based on an optical phenomenon called “total internal reflection” (Fig. 2.1). It occurs when the angle of incidence of the light is so great that the light will be completely reflected (critical angle). When light crosses a boundary between materials with different refractive indices, the light beam is partially reflected and partially refracted (Fig. 2.2). But if the angle of incidence is greater than the critical angle the light is totally reflected back [13].

Fig. 2.1
figure 1

Total internal reflection phenomenon

Fig. 2.2
figure 2

The principle of total internal reflection

In the eye the critical angle is 46° at the air-cornea interface. The use of a goniolens eliminates total internal reflection by replacing the tear film-air interface with a new tear film-goniolens interface. Direct gonioscopy provides a direct view of the angle. Indirect gonioscopy provides a mirror image of the opposite angle.

This method utilizes a dome-shaped lens, which provides a panoramic view and direct visualization of the angle structures with a hand-held microscope and with the patient in supine position. The lenses commonly used for direct gonioscopy have been realized by Koeppe (Fig. 2.3) and Swan-Jacob. The patient lies in a supine position. The lens is placed on the cornea, and a saline or viscous solution is used to bridge the gap between the lens and the cornea. The angle is examined using a counterbalanced hand-held binocular microscope and an illuminator. An operating microscope can also be used. The advantages of this technique are the panoramic view, an erect image, the binocularity and the possibility to examine both eyes simultaneously. The disadvantages include a deeper angle due to the supine position, poor details, and special equipment. Direct gonioscopy is employed mainly in congenital glaucoma surgery.

Fig. 2.3
figure 3

Direct gonioscopy by the Koeppe lens

This technique utilizes some lenses called gonioprisms. These lenses may have 1–6 mirrors with angles ranging from 59° to 64° to the horizontal (Fig. 2.4). The light reflected from the angle of the anterior chamber passes into the lens and is reflected by a mirror onto the examiner (Fig. 2.5). The examination is performed at the slit lamp with the patient in sitting position. This method provides the clearest visualization of the anterior chamber angle structures while the illumination and magnification is provided by the slit lamp. Indirect gonioscopy can be divided into two sections: static gonioscopy and dynamic gonioscopy.

Fig. 2.4
figure 4

A scheme of the Goldmann three mirror lens

Fig. 2.5
figure 5

The mirror reflects the light from the angle to the examiner

Static gonioscopy can be performed by scleral type lenses. They have a broad area of contact and a steep convex surface. A viscous methylcellulose fluid is used as coupling substance between the lens and the corneal surface. There are a lot of lenses available for static gonioscopy, the most commonly used is the Goldmann three mirror lens (Fig. 2.6). This lens has the following features: a mirror inclined at 59°, a posterior diameter of 12 mm and a posterior radius of curvature of 7.38 mm. Many other lenses by Goldmann (1–6 mirrors), Ritch, Latina, Karickhoff, and Russel-Fankhauser (Fig. 2.7) etc. can be used.

Fig. 2.6
figure 6

The Goldmann three mirror lens

Fig. 2.7
figure 7

The Russel-Fankhauser single mirror lens

The anterior chamber angle width should be evaluated with the lens located centrally on the cornea; indentation should be avoided because of the narrowing of the angle; inadvertent pressure of the lens can also determine corneal folds (Fig. 2.8), or blood to reflux into the Schlemm’s canal. If the iris profile is convex and the structures of the angle cannot clearly be visualized, a more tangential viewing is necessary. In this case there are two options to look “over the hill”: moving the mirror toward the angle being viewed (Fig. 2.9), or asking the patient to look in the direction of the mirror (Fig. 2.10).

Fig. 2.8
figure 8

Corneal folds induced by an excessive pressure on the lens. The angle cannot be visualized in detail

Fig. 2.9
figure 9

In narrow angles, it is possible to move the mirror toward the angle to study the anatomy

Fig. 2.10
figure 10

Alternatively, in narrow angles it is possible to ask the patient to look at the mirror we are looking at

Dynamic gonioscopy can be performed by corneal type 4 mirror lenses (Sussmann, Posner, Zeiss). The Zeiss lens (Fig. 2.11) has a posterior diameter of 9 mm and a posterior radius of curvature of 7.72. This allows usage of the lens without a coupling fluid, obtaining a central depression of the corneal surface and a posterior displacement of the iris root (Figs. 2.12 and 2.13).

Fig. 2.11
figure 11

The Zeiss four mirror lens

Fig. 2.12
figure 12

The central depression of the corneal surface causes a peripheral displacement of the aqueous humor and a posterior displacement of the iris root

Fig. 2.13
figure 13

Dynamic gonioscopy in a narrow angle. The posterior displacement of the iris opens the angle

In narrow angles, performing dynamic gonioscopy is crucial (Fig. 2.14). The corneal indentation displaces the aqueous humor peripherally and the iris root posteriorly. If the angle is not visible there is a synechial angle closure, otherwise there is an appositional closure that is reversible and the angle structures become visible with indentation. An anteriorly displaced lens or a larger diameter lens can also be involved in the angle closure mechanism (Fig. 2.15).

Fig. 2.14
figure 14

Dynamic gonioscopy in a narrow angle with a convex iris profile. Visualization before performing central corneal indentation

Fig. 2.15
figure 15

Mechanism of dynamic gonioscopy. Indentation can open appositional angle closures, but it does not work in chronic or synechial angle closures. Sometimes an increased lens also could not allow the opening of the angle

2.2 Anatomy

Gonioscopy allows evaluation of the normal anatomy of the anterior chamber angle. Looking at the angle to understand the normal anatomy is important to recognize the angle landmarks. The following structures should be identified during the angle examination in primary gaze and on manipulation or indentation:

  1. 1.

    Level of iris insertion

  2. 2.

    Shape of peripheral iris profile

  3. 3.

    Width of the angle recess

  4. 4.

    Degree of trabecular pigmentation

  5. 5.

    Areas of iridotrabecular apposition

  6. 6.

    Anterior synechiae

To examine the angle direct focal illumination is necessary, and a narrow beam should be used to evaluate the width of the angle. It is important to avoid pupillary constriction, which can open the angle recess and deepen the anterior chamber. Sometimes, to identify the scleral spur retro-illumination is necessary. A fixation light may be used to maintain ocular alignment.

At first, the inferior quadrant should be examined because of its greater depth and pigmentation, so that it is easier to identify the structures mentioned above. Then in a clockwise direction, all the other quadrants can be observed. The following structures are present in a normal angle starting from the iris root (Fig. 2.16):

Fig. 2.16
figure 16

Normal anatomy of an anterior chamber angle visible by gonioscopy. The following landmarks can be recognized: Schwalbe’s line (red arrow), non-pigmented trabecular meshwork (blue arrow), pigmented trabecular meshwork (white arrow), Schlemm’s canal, scleral spur (yellow arrow), ciliary body band (green arrow)

  1. (a)

    Ciliary body band

  2. (b)

    Scleral spur

  3. (c)

    Schlemm’s canal

  4. (d)

    Pigmented trabecular meshwork

  5. (e)

    Non-pigmented trabecular meshwork

  6. (f)

    Schwalbe’s line

Scleral spur and Schwalbe’s line should be identified at first and then all the other structures can be recognized [14].

2.2.1 Schwalbe’s Line

The Schwalbe’s line appears as an opaque translucent line that represents the peripheral termination of Descemet’s membrane and the anterior limit of the trabeculum. It marks the transition between the endothelium of the cornea and the trabecular meshwork. Sometimes, it may be prominent and anteriorly displaced (posterior embryotoxon) (Fig. 2.17), or heavy pigmented; pigmentation anterior to the Schwalbe’s line constitutes the Sampaolesi’s line (Fig. 2.18), and this is often disposed noisily, resembling salt and pepper.

Fig. 2.17
figure 17

A prominent anteriorly displaced Schwalbe’s line

Fig. 2.18
figure 18

Pigment distribution anterior to the Schwalbe’s line (red arrows) to constitute the Sampaolesi’s line

The parallelepiped or the corneal wedge technique can be used to identify the exact position of the Schwalbe’s line (Figs. 2.19, 2.20, and 2.21). By using a thin slit of light inclined 10–15° from the angle of the oculars, two separate corneal reflections can be seen, one from the inner surface of the cornea, and one from the outer surface. These two reflections meet at Schwalbe’s line, which extends in a perpendicular direction across the trabecular meshwork and marks the anterior border of the trabecular meshwork itself. This technique is very useful in lightly pigmented angles and in angles with a confusing anatomy (Fig. 2.22). In the superior and inferior quadrant, it is easiest to generate a vertical slit and to identify the corneal wedge.

Fig. 2.19
figure 19

The corneal wedge technique

Fig. 2.20
figure 20

The two light reflections, respectively, from the inner and the outer surface of the cornea, meet at Schwalbe’s line (red arrow)

Fig. 2.21
figure 21

Corneal wedge technique in a lightly pigmented angle. The apex indicates the Schwalbe’s line (red arrow)

Fig. 2.22
figure 22

An easiest representation of the angle’s landmarks: Sampaolesi’s line (blue arrow), Schwalbe’s line (red arrow), trabecular meshwork (white arrow), scleral spur (yellow arrow), ciliary body band (green arrow)

2.2.2 Trabecular Meshwork

This extends posteriorly from the Schwalbe’s line to the scleral spur. It is possible to distinguish an anterior nonfunctional part next to the Schwalbe’s line with a whitish color; and a posterior functional part adjacent to the scleral spur, which is pigmented (Fig. 2.23). Trabecular pigmentation increases with age and is accentuated in the inferior quadrant due to gravitational setting and aqueous circulation; an increase in the pigmentation of the angle could be related to pathological conditions such as exfoliation syndrome, pigment dispersion syndrome, or inflammation. Pigmentation has little relation to skin or hair color. At gonioscopy, it appears with an irregular and rough surface; the trabecular meshwork band appears as 5 mm wide at the slit-lamp examination.

Fig. 2.23
figure 23

The trabecular meshwork. It can be divided into two parts: a lightly or non-pigmented anterior (blue arrow) trabecular meshwork and a pigmented posterior (white arrow) trabecular meshwork

2.2.3 Scleral Spur

Going posteriorly between the trabecular meshwork and the ciliary body there is the scleral spur, which appears as a narrow whitish band that marks the posterior border of the trabecular meshwork (Fig. 2.24). Sometimes it is not visible because of an anterior iris insertion, iris processes (Fig. 2.25), excessive pigmentation (Fig. 2.26), or peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS).

Fig. 2.24
figure 24

The scleral spur (yellow arrows)

Fig. 2.25
figure 25

Iris processes may obscure the scleral spur

Fig. 2.26
figure 26

The scleral spur is not visible due to an excessive pigmentation

2.2.4 Ciliary Body Band

Anterior to the iris insertion, a portion of the ciliary body is visible (Fig. 2.27). The width of the band depends on the position of the iris insertion, and it may be wide in myopia or following trauma, but it also can be narrow in hyperopia and anterior insertion of the iris. The band appears as gray or dark brown at gonioscopic examination. Before commenting on any abnormality, the width of the band must be compared between the two eyes.

Fig. 2.27
figure 27

A wide ciliary body band (green arrow)

2.2.5 Iris and Iris Process

The iris insertion is usually at the anterior face of the ciliary body, and normally the iris has radial markings with crypts. Three features are really important to determine the angle anatomy: the contour of the iris (convex, concave, or flat), the site, and the way of the iris insertion. It is important during the examination of the iris to notice the presence of nevi, tumors, atrophy, iridodonesis, and abnormal pigmentation. The peripheral iris configuration may provide important clues to the presence of pigment dispersion syndrome, plateau iris, or pupillary block.

Iris processes are small extensions of the anterior surface of the iris, which insert at the level of the scleral spur (Figs. 2.25 and 2.28). The iris processes are more frequent in young patients and in brown eyes. They appear as gray or brown finger-like extensions of the peripheral iris at gonioscopy and do not block the iris movements during indentation gonioscopy.

Fig. 2.28
figure 28

Iris processes between the peripheral iris and the scleral spur

2.2.6 Schlemm’s Canal

Schlemm’s canal is not normally visible, it is located within the posterior trabecular meshwork and is anterior to the scleral spur. It may be seen when there is blood inside the canal for example, if the goniolens compresses the episcleral veins such that the episcleral venous pressure exceeds the intraocular pressure (IOP) (Fig. 2.29).

Fig. 2.29
figure 29

The Schlemm’s canal can be visualized as a red discontinuous line

At gonioscopic examination it is seen deep in the posterior half of the trabecular meshwork as a red discontinuous line (Figs. 2.30 and 2.31). The pressure of the episcleral veins may be high also in different conditions: carotid-cavernous fistula, in Sturge-Weber syndrome, venous compression, ocular hypotony, or sickle cell disease.

Fig. 2.30
figure 30

The Schlemm’s canal can be visualized if there is blood inside

Fig. 2.31
figure 31

Bleeding from the Schlemm’s canal

2.2.7 Blood Vessels

Blood vessels may be visible in the normal anterior chamber angle (Fig. 2.32). They are more visible in blue eyes rather than in dark eyes. Normally the vessels run in a radial pattern at the base of the angle recess or perpendicular to the iris plane deep in the ciliary body. Normal vessels as a rule do not cross the scleral spur, are large and have a radial or circumferential orientation (Figs. 2.33 and 2.34). Pathological vessels are usually thinner, have a disordered orientation with anastamoses, and may run across the scleral spur.

Fig. 2.32
figure 32

Blood vessels may be visible in a normal angle

Fig. 2.33
figure 33

Large vessels in a normal angle

Fig. 2.34
figure 34

Circumferential normal vessel not crossing the scleral spur

2.3 Gonioscopy Grading Systems

Determination of the angle width is really important in order to understand the functional status of the angle, the degree of angle closure, and the risk of future closure.

Grading of the angle can be obtained by the Van Herick method or by a gonioscopic grading system.

The Van Herick technique is used to assess the limbal anterior chamber depth. A narrow beam of light is directed perpendicularly at the temporal limbus, and the depth of the anterior chamber is evaluated as a fraction of the adjacent corneal thickness (Fig. 2.35) [15].

Fig. 2.35
figure 35

The Van Herick method. Grade 0: iridocorneal contact (angle closed). Grade 1: the space between the iris and corneal endothelium is <¼ of corneal thickness (angle closure likely). Grade 2: the space is >¼ – <1/2 of corneal thickness (angle occludable). Grade 3: the space is >1/2 of corneal thickness (angle not occludable). Grade 4: the space is equal to the corneal thickness (open angle)

The width of the angle is determined by the insertion of the iris root on the ciliary body, the convexity of the iris, the prominence of the peripheral iris roll and the pupillary size.

Gonioscopy provides a subjective assessment of the angle width, but grading of the angle is essential for a systematic approach in the evaluation of the angle anatomy.

The use of a grading system allows comparison of findings at different times in the same patient, or to classify different patients.

There are three grading systems currently in use:

  1. 1.

    Shaffer

  2. 2.

    Spaeth

  3. 3.

    Scheie

2.3.1 Shaffer’s System

The Shaffer’s system describes the angle between the iris and the trabecular meshwork [9].

The angle is recorded in degrees of arc subtended by two imaginary tangential lines: a line tangential to the inner surface of the trabeculum and the other line tangential to the iris surface about one-third of the distance from its periphery. In practice, the angle is graded according to the visibility of various angle structures. Angle >20° is considered open. The system assigns a numerical grade (4-0) to each angle with associated anatomical description, angle width in degrees, and implied clinical interpretation (Fig. 2.36).

Fig. 2.36
figure 36

The Shaffer’s System

  • Grade 4 (35-45°) is the widest angle in which the ciliary body can be visualized, closure is impossible

  • Grade 3 (20–35°) is an open angle in which the scleral spur can be identified, closure is impossible.

  • Grade 2 (20°) is a moderately narrow angle in which only the trabeculum can be identified; angle closure is possible but unlikely.

  • Grade 1 (10°) is a very narrow angle in which only Schwalbe’s line can be identified; there is a high risk of angle closure.

  • Slit angle no angle structures can be identified; this angle has the danger of imminent closure.

  • Grade 0 (0°) is a closed angle; there is iridocorneal contact, and it is not possible to recognize the apex of the corneal wedge.

2.3.2 Scheie Grading System

The Scheie grading system describes with Roman numerals the degree of angle closure, with larger numbers signifying a narrower angle; the system is based on the extent of visible angle structures (Fig. 2.37) [10].

Fig. 2.37
figure 37

The Scheie grading system

  • Grade 0 the widest angle in which the ciliary body can be seen.

  • Grade I wide angle in which a narrow ciliary body band can be seen.

  • Grade II is an open angle in which at least the scleral spur can be identified.

  • Grade III is a moderate narrow angle in which only the anterior trabecular meshwork is visible.

  • Grade IV angle is closed.

2.3.3 Spaeth System

The Spaeth system grades three aspects of angle configuration [12]:

2.3.3.1 Angular Width of Angle Recess

The examiner estimates the width of the angle, considering the angle between a line tangential to the trabecular meshwork and a line tangential to the iris surface about one-third of the way from the periphery (Fig. 2.38).

Fig. 2.38
figure 38

The Spaeth System: angular width of angle recess

  1. (a)

    Slit

  2. (b)

    10° Narrow

  3. (c)

    20°

  4. (d)

    30° Wide

  5. (e)

    40°

2.3.3.2 Level of Iris Insertion (Fig. 2.39)

Fig. 2.39
figure 39

The Spaeth System: level of iris insertion. The letters on the (arrows) identifies the level of the iris insertion (Anterior, Behind Schwalbe’s line, Centered on the sclera, Deep to scleral spur, Extremely deep)

  1. (a)

    Anterior: iris insertion anterior to the Schwalbe’s line

  2. (b)

    Behind Schwalbe’s line: iris insertion behind the Schwalbe’s line

  3. (c)

    Centered on sclera: on the scleral spur

  4. (d)

    Deep to scleral spur: behind the scleral spur

  5. (e)

    Extremely deep: on the ciliary band

2.3.3.3 Iris Configuration (Fig. 2.40)

Fig. 2.40
figure 40

The Spaeth System: iris configuration

  • s: steep, anteriorly convex

  • r: regular or flat

  • q: queer, anteriorly concave.

It also considers the grade of trabecular meshwork pigmentation (TMP) from 1 (minimal) to 4 (dense) (Fig. 2.41).

Fig. 2.41
figure 41

The Spaeth System: trabecular meshwork pigmentation

2.4 Pathology

2.4.1 Congenital and Developmental Glaucoma

In infants gonioscopy is performed using Koeppe lens or the Swan-Jacob lens; the baby could be sedated for the examination on the operating microscope; but the examination could also be performed at the office. Gonioscopy distinguishes primary congenital glaucoma from secondary glaucoma and is really helpful in planning surgery. Congenital glaucoma presents at birth or between 1 month and 2 years of age. It is the consequence of the developmental arrest of the anterior chamber angle tissue; the trabeculo-dysgenesis is the only ocular anomaly in 50 % of cases; with a higher insertion of the iris and ciliary body onto the posterior trabecular beams which causes their compression and creates an obstruction to aqueous outflow. It is typical to observe an open angle with high insertion of the iris root, which forms a line with small curves.

  1. (a)

    The iris insertion could be at or anterior to the scleral spur (Fig. 2.42), and the ciliary body is covered by this insertion and is not visible (in normal infants the iris inserts flatly on the ciliary body face). The appearance of the trabecular meshwork is orange peel and the iris stroma may be thin and may expose radial blood vessels.

    Fig. 2.42
    figure 42

    Congenital glaucoma. The iris insertion is at the Schwalbe’s line

  2. (b)

    The iris insertion could be into the chamber angle. The plane of the iris is posterior to the scleral spur, but the anterior stroma inserts just behind the Schwalbe’s line.

Usually, abnormal tissue with a glistening appearance is seen in the angle and seems to pull the peripheral iris anteriorly. Above the iris root loops of vessels from the major arterial circle are sometimes visible, and there could be a fine tissue covering the peripheral iris, which usually is thinner and flatter.

2.4.1.1 Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome

Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome is a set of diseases, which includes Axenfeld anomaly (posterior embryotoxon associated with iridocorneal adhesions) (Fig. 2.43); Axenfeld syndrome (Axenfeld anomaly with glaucoma) (Fig. 2.44); Rieger anomaly (Axenfeld anomaly, iris stromal thinning, iris hole, corectopia); and Rieger Syndrome (Rieger anomaly with systemic developmental anomalies) (Fig. 2.45) [16].

Fig. 2.43
figure 43

Axenfeld syndrome. Irido-corneal adhesions at biomicroscopy

Fig. 2.44
figure 44

Gonioscopy of the same patient. Tissue strands in the anterior chamber

Fig. 2.45
figure 45

Rieger syndrome

Glaucoma originates from the developmental arrest of the anterior segment tissue derived from the neural crest cells.

Typical gonioscopic features are:

  1. 1.

    Anteriorly displaced Schwalbe’s line (posterior embryotoxon) (Fig. 2.17); sometimes the line is suspended from the cornea by a thin membrane.

  2. 2.

    Tissue strands in the anterior chamber angle; similar in color and texture to the iris (Fig. 2.46).

    Fig. 2.46
    figure 46

    Axenfeld syndrome. Tissue strands in the anterior chamber angle

  3. 3.

    Open angle.

  4. 4.

    The scleral spur is covered by the iris insertion.

2.4.1.2 Aniridia

Aniridia is characterized by the absence of the iris; even if at gonioscopy a rudimentary stump of the iris is usually present (Figs. 2.47 and 2.48) [17]. The angle is open and sometimes strands of tissue in the angle with fine blood vessels extending from the iris root to the trabecular meshwork are visible. In 10–15 years the angle progressively closes and the iris comes to lie over the trabecular meshwork.

Fig. 2.47
figure 47

Aniridia. A small part of the iris is visible

Fig. 2.48
figure 48

Aniridia. The ciliary body is visible. It is visible also a blue loop of the IOL in the bag

Gonioscopy can demonstrate anomaly of the angle in primary and secondary developmental glaucoma. It is possible to observe anterior iris insertion, prominent iris process, and featureless angle. Iris processes are the remnants of normal development of angle and can be a normal variation.

2.4.2 Open Angle Glaucomas

2.4.2.1 Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome

The deposition of fibrillar protein matrix throughout the anterior segment (on the lens, the angle, the iris, the corneal endothelium, the zonula and the ciliary body) is the main feature of this syndrome. In these patients the IOP can increase to higher values than in POAG patients. It is very important to observe the angle to recognize the syndrome [18] even if the severity of the material deposition cannot be related to an increased risk of glaucoma development. It is possible to observe flecks of exfoliation material adherent to the trabecular meshwork (Fig. 2.49) and pigmentation may be increased with a discontinuous segmental distribution (Fig. 2.50) [19]. A scalloped band of pigment running anterior to the Schwalbe’s line (Sampaolesi’s line) is frequent (Figs. 2.51 and 2.52).

Fig. 2.49
figure 49

Flecks of exfoliation material adherent to the trabecular meshwork (red arrows) in pseudoexfoliation syndrome

Fig. 2.50
figure 50

The discontinuous distribution of the pigment throughout the angle in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma

Fig. 2.51
figure 51

The Sampaolesi’s line (red arrow) above the Schwalbe’s line

Fig. 2.52
figure 52

The Sampaolesi’s line (red arrow) in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma

2.4.2.2 Pigment Dispersion Syndrome

Pigment dispersion syndrome is usually a bilateral disorder characterized by the liberation of pigment granules from the iris pigment epithelium and their deposition throughout the anterior segment, mainly in the trabecular meshwork. The diagnosis is possible by the slit-lamp observing mid-peripheral iris trans-illumination defects, diffuse and dense brownish pigmentation of the angle, and pigment granules on the corneal endothelium (Krukenberg spindle) [20]. The angle is open with a deeper anterior chamber both because the iris could be more posterior inserted or the iris stroma could be floppy. The iris has a marked concave configuration in the mid periphery (Fig. 2.53). The pigment distribution can be positioned over all the angle structures (Fig. 2.54), even if usually a homogeneous dense, very dark band covering the trabecular meshwork can be observed (Figs. 2.55, 2.56, and 2.57) [21].

Fig. 2.53
figure 53

In pigment dispersion syndrome there is a wide concavity of the iris profile

Fig. 2.54
figure 54

Deposition of pigment all over the angle structures

Fig. 2.55
figure 55

Pigmentary glaucoma. Deposition of pigment mainly on the trabecular meshwork

Fig. 2.56
figure 56

Deposition of pigment over the trabecular meshwork. The Sampaolesi’s line and the scleral spur are visible

Fig. 2.57
figure 57

Pigment granules in the angle

2.4.2.3 Post-traumatic Glaucoma

Gonioscopy must be performed in every patient with unexplained unilateral glaucoma or in patients with a history of ocular trauma, even after many years [22]. Many different signs may be observed after a blunt trauma. A bleeding vessel may be noted (Fig. 2.30), a blood clot may obscure the angle structures (Fig. 2.58) or blood may be present in the Schlemm’s canal (Figs. 2.29 and 2.30). An increased irregular pigmentation after anterior inflammation (Fig. 2.59) or peripheral anterior synechiae (Figs. 2.60 and 2.61) may be observed. The posterior displacement of the iris root, the angle recession (Fig. 2.62), or an iridodialysis (Figs. 2.63 and 2.64) could lead more frequently to a post-traumatic glaucoma. An irregularly broadened ciliary body band must be compared with the fellow eye to diagnose an angle recession.

Fig. 2.58
figure 58

Post-traumatic hyphema covering the angle landmarks

Fig. 2.59
figure 59

Pigment granules in the angle after an iridociclitis

Fig. 2.60
figure 60

Wide angular synechiae and precipitates in anterior uveitis

Fig. 2.61
figure 61

A peripheral anterior synechia

Fig. 2.62
figure 62

A post-traumatic angle recession, mydriasis, lens subluxation, and ciliary body visualization

Fig. 2.63
figure 63

A wide iridodialysis with visualization of the ciliary processes

Fig. 2.64
figure 64

Iridodyalisis

2.4.3 Angle Closure Glaucomas

Angle closure is identified by gonioscopy, the “reference standard” diagnostic procedure. A narrow angle recess, usually narrower than 20°, characterizes primary angle closure. Fundamental during gonioscopy is the manipulation and the indentation of the angle to establish if the closure is appositional or synechial.

Looking at a narrow angle, the following features should be evaluated [4, 23]

  1. 1.

    Schwalbe’s line visible or not; if not the angle is closed (Fig. 2.65).

    Fig. 2.65
    figure 65

    Angle closure. The Schwalbe’s line is not visible

  2. 2.

    Trabecular meshwork visible or not; if not in at least three quadrants in primary position without manipulation, the angle can be classified as occludable (Fig. 2.66).

    Fig. 2.66
    figure 66

    Occludable angle. The trabecular meshwork is visible under the Schwalbe’s line

  3. 3.

    Evidence of a previous angle closure attack: goniosynechiae, peripheral anterior synechiae, glaukomflecken, iris atrophy, increased or pattern pigmentation.

  4. 4.

    Symmetry of gonioscopic findings between the two eyes and between the superior and inferior quadrants of the same eye (Figs. 2.67 and 2.68).

    Fig. 2.67
    figure 67

    The inferior sector of an angle. The Schwalbe’s line and the trabecular meshwork are visible

    Fig. 2.68
    figure 68

    The superior sector of the same eye. Some synechiae are visible and the angle is partially closed. An iridotomy is also visible

Primary angle closure may become chronic after an acute attack or due to the long-term use of miotics [24]. The angle is permanently closed and PAS can be easily identified by indentation gonioscopy [25]. Laser iridotomy is mandatory in angle closure glaucoma and gonioscopy should be repeated at least every 6 months to identify any possible change even if there is a patent iridotomy. Irido-trabecular apposition after iridotomy suggests a secondary mechanism of angle closure; mechanisms of secondary angle closure include disorders of the ciliary body, lens-induced angle closure (phacomorphic glaucoma) or malignant glaucoma with a misdirection of the aqueous humor [26]. The treatment of all these types of glaucoma is related to the identification of the underlying pathophysiology.

2.4.3.1 Iridocorneal Endothelial (Ice) Syndrome

ICE syndrome is a rare disorder, more frequent in young to middle-aged females, characterized by unilateral angle closure glaucoma. There are some typical features of these groups of disorders, first of all an abnormal physiology of the endothelium, then corneal edema and progressive iris atrophy. There are three types of the disease:

  • Chandler’s syndrome (corneal edema predominates)

  • Iris Nevus/Cogan Reese Syndrome (nodular iris lesions are present associated with corneal and iris defects)

  • Progressive iris atrophy (iris changes predominate with corectopia, atrophy, and hole formation).

Peripheral anterior synechiae are common findings at gonioscopic examination; PAS usually extends anterior to the Shwalbe’s line [16]. These result from contraction of endothelial cell layers and fibrous tissue that extends from the corneal endothelium onto the trabecular meshwork and the iris (Fig. 2.69).

Fig. 2.69
figure 69

Irido-corneal-endothelial syndrome. A wide goniosynechia is visible

2.4.3.2 Uveitic Glaucoma

Inflammation in uveitis leads to hypersecretion of aqueous humor and to obstruction of the trabecular meshwork by serum components and inflammatory precipitates (Fig. 2.70), trabeculitis, scarring of trabecular meshwork and peripheral anterior synechiae formation. As a consequence, the intraocular pressure rises and glaucoma develops. In uveitic glaucoma the angle can be open or closed. Closed angle glaucoma is related to several mechanisms: pupillary block, iris bombe, PAS (Fig. 2.60), anterior rotation of lens iris diaphragm or neovascularization. The IOP rise can develop both during the acute phase of the inflammation for trabecular obstruction or later on, due to the scarring of the trabecular meshwork. Observing the anterior chamber angle after iridocyclitis, a typical clod deposition of pigment may be noted (Fig. 2.59). Other frequent findings after inflammation are the anterior peripheral synechiae that can be small or tent-shaped and the angle that remains open (Figs. 2.61 and 2.71). But PAS can also be larger, causing a secondary angle closure (Fig. 2.72).

Fig. 2.70
figure 70

Acute anterior uveitis. Endothelial inflammatory precipitates

Fig. 2.71
figure 71

Anterior synechia adherent to the Schwalbe’s line

Fig. 2.72
figure 72

A wide anterior sinechia. The edge of an anterior chamber IOL is visible

2.4.3.3 Neovascular Glaucoma

Retinal ischemia may lead to a neovascularization of the angle till the development of a neovascular glaucoma. This disease has a pre-glaucoma stage, an open angle glaucoma stage and an angle closure glaucoma stage. In the first stage, neovascularization appears on the pupillary margin or in the angle. Vascular trunks may cross the scleral spur and arborize irregularly on the trabecular meshwork. In the second stage, there is a fine fibrous membrane, invisible on gonioscopy, obstructing the aqueous flow [27] (Fig. 2.73). In the angle closure stage, the fibrovascular membrane pulls the iris toward the trabecular meshwork with peripheral anterior synechiae formation [28] (Fig. 2.74).

Fig. 2.73
figure 73

Neovascular glaucoma. Vascular trunks cross the scleral spur. The Schlemm’s canal also is filled with blood

Fig. 2.74
figure 74

New vessels on the iris surface. A secondary angle closure is present

2.4.4 Post-surgical Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle

After filtering surgery gonioscopy is critical to understand the outcome of the surgery. Trabeculectomy represents the gold standard for glaucoma surgery (Fig. 2.75), and with gonioscopy it is possible to study the site where the trabecular tissue is removed during surgery and the site of iridectomy. Sometimes, a rise in IOP can be due to the obstruction of this site by anterior synechiae or any other material (Figs. 2.76, 2.77, and 2.78).

Fig. 2.75
figure 75

Trabeculectomy. A large vessel is visible in the sclerostomy site

Fig. 2.76
figure 76

Partially closed trabeculectomy by a basal synechia due to a too central iridectomy

Fig. 2.77
figure 77

Remnant of a cataract occluding the iridectomy and the trabeculectomy

Fig. 2.78
figure 78

Through the iridectomy, it is possible to observe the ciliary body and exfoliative material over the ciliary processes

Vitreoretinal surgery sometimes can cause glaucoma; a rise of intraocular pressure may be observed in early postoperative period due to overfilling of the posterior chamber with silicon oil or gas. But also secondary glaucoma may develop for the obstruction of the trabecular meshwork by emulsified silicon oil (Fig. 2.79). Sometimes, perfluorocarbon liquid bubbles can also be observed in the inferior sector as a remnant of intraoperative tamponade to lay down the retina (Fig. 2.80).

Fig. 2.79
figure 79

Silicon oil bubbles occlude the angle in the superior sector

Fig. 2.80
figure 80

Perfluorocarbon liquid bubbles in the inferior sector as remnant of vitreous surgery