Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Networked Societies for Learning: Emergent Learning Activity in Connected and Participatory Meshworks

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Learning, Design, and Technology

Abstract

Within richly networked societies, a new culture of learning is operating – a culture where knowledge is perceived as fluid and constantly evolving, where technology is used to promote connections, and where individual experiences are enhanced and refined through collective encounters. Learning in the Digital Age is often mediated through connections in networks of people and things – it involves understanding what are the best tools and social strategies that may support collaboration and sustain people’s connections in networked structures. In order to help the twenty-first century learners to develop skills and knowledge necessary to successfully navigate the digital realm, educational designers need analytical tools to help them address the complexity of contemporary learning situations. This chapter discusses a networked learning approach to the analysis of complex learning situations, which combines ideas from the Activity-Centred Analysis and Design (ACAD) framework, and the notion of entanglement of things and humans. The application of the networked approach is illustrated through two case studies – one involves learning within a museum setting and the second one is an outdoor activity with university students. The approach helps reveal deeper and innovative understandings of the learning connections and modes of participation that are at play in contemporary networked learning situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddington, A., & Boys, J. (Eds.). (2011). Re-shaping learning: A critical reader—The future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonderup Dohn, N., Crammer, S., Sime, J., de Laat, M., & Ryberg, T. (Eds.). (2018). Networked learning: Situating networked learning: Looking back – Moving forward. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L. (2017). The O in MONA: Reshaping museum. In L. Carvalho, P. Goodyear, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Place-based spaces for networked learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., & Garduño Freeman, C. (2018). CmyView: Learning by walking and sharing social values. In N. Bonderup Dohn, S. Cranmer, J. Sime, M. de Laat, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Networked learning: Situating networked learning: Looking back – Moving forward (pp. 167–186). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., Goodyear, P., & de Laat, M. (Eds.). (2017). Place-based spaces for networked learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, C. (2016). Open, networked and connected learning: Bridging the formal/informal learning divide in higher education. In S. Cranmer, N. B. Dohn, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & J. A. Sime (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th international conference on networked learning (pp. 76–84). Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damsa, C., & Jornet, A. (2016). Revisiting learning in higher education – Framing notions redefined through an ecological perspective. Frontline Learning Research, 4(4), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Laat, M., & Dawson, S. (2017). Is there anybody out there? Place-based networks for learning. In L. Carvalho, P. Goodyear, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Place-based spaces for networked learning (pp. 100–110). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (Eds.). (2018). Spaces of teaching and learning: Integrating perspectives on research and practice. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Considering materiality in educational policy: Messy objects and multiple reals. Educational Theory, 6(6), 709–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatt, C., & Ingold, T. (2013). From description to correspondence: Anthropology in real time. In: W. Gunn, T. Otto, and R. C. Smith, (Eds.), Design anthropology: Theory and practice (pp. 139–158). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garduño Freeman, C. (2017a). Informal networked learning as teamwork in design studio CmyView: Using mobile digital technologies to connect with student’s everyday experiences. In R. Tucker (Ed.), Collaboration and student engagement in design education (pp. 188–208). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garduño Freeman, C. (2017b). Participatory culture and the social value of an architectural icon: Sydney Opera House. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreta-Domingo, M., Sloep, P. B., Hérnandez-Leo, D., & Mor, Y. (2017). Design for collective intelligence: Pop-up communities in MOOCs. AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0745-0

  • Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaccardi, E. (Ed.). (2012). Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogia, L. (2016). Collaborative curiosity: Demonstrating relationships between open education, networked learning and connected learning. In S. Cranmer, N. B. Dohn, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & J. A. Sime (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th international conference on networked learning (pp. 85–92). Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 259–276). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Dohn, N. (2016). Artefacts and activities in the analysis of learning networks. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries and policy in networked learning (pp. 145–164). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). In medias res: Reframing design for learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21(19909), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2016). It’s not all about the learner: Reframing students’ digital literacy as sociomaterial practice. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning (pp. 77–92). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (2013). Human-thing evolution: The selection and persistence of traits at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. In S. Bergerbrant & S. Sabatini (Eds.), Counterpoint: Essays in archaeology and heritage studies in honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen (pp. 583–591). Oxford, UK: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (2016). Studies in human-thing entanglement. Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0). Retrieved from: http://www.ian-hodder.com/books/studies-human-thing-entanglement. Accessed 2 June 2018.

  • Hodgson, V., de Laat, M., McConnell, D., & Ryberg, T. (Eds.). (2014). The design, experience and practice of networked learning. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2012). Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., … Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandric, P., & Boras, D. (2015). Critical learning in digital networks. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JISC. (2014). Developing digital literacies. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/developing-digital-literacies. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.

  • Jones, C. (2008). Networked learning – A social practice perspective. In V. Hodgson, C. Jones, T. Kargidis, D. McConell, S. Retalis, D. Stamatis, & M. Zenios (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on networked learning (pp. 616–623). Halkidiki, Greece: Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2015). Networked learning: An educational paradigm for the age of digital networks. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(1), 3:1–3:20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking teaching for the knowledge society. Educause Review, 37(1), 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Maldonado, R., Goodyear, P., Kay, J., Carvalho, L. & Thompson, K. (2016). An actionable approach to understand group experience in complex, multi-surface spaces. In CHI’16, May 07–12, 2016, San Jose, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., & Bartlett, J. (2012). Digital fluency: Towards young people’s critical use of the internet. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2), 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. PISA. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2017). What is wrong with energy efficiency? Building Research & Information. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09613218.2017.1361746. Accessed 2 June 2018

  • Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, P., Curwood, J. S., Carvalho, L., & Simpson, A. (2015). Moving across physical and online spaces: A case study in a blended primary classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 458–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M., & Ware, M. (2008). Learning, change, and power: Competing discourses of technology and literacy. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 215–240). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, P. (2015). Habits & habitats: An ethnography of learning entanglement. The University of Sydney. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/13982. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.

  • Yeoman, P. (2018). The material correspondence of learning. In R. Ellis & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Spaces of teaching and learning: Integrating perspectives on research and practice. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014). Material entanglement in a primary school learning network. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C. Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on networked learning (pp. 331–338). Edinburgh, UK: Networked Learning Conference Orgniser.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand

    Lucila Carvalho

Authors
  1. Lucila Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucila Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of Info, Ste G150, Univ of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA

    Michael J Spector

  2. School of Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA

    Barbara B Lockee

  3. School of Education, Baker University, Overland Park, Kansas, USA

    Marcus D. Childress

Section Editor information

  1. Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Jan Elen

  2. Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Geraldine Clarebout

  3. Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Geraldine Clarebout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Carvalho, L. (2018). Networked Societies for Learning: Emergent Learning Activity in Connected and Participatory Meshworks. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_55-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_55-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation