Abstract
This chapter provides a brief overview and understanding of the historical evolution of the field of systems thinking, which has been characterized as occurring in three waves, the last of which recognized a plurality of methods and approaches. In the last decade, a fourth wave has emerged that is based on four simple cognitive tasks or “rules” – making distinctions and recognizing systems, relationships, and perspectives (DSRP). These four rules combine in infinitely complex ways to produce the emergent property of systems thinking. They underlie and serve to integrate the diverse methods and approaches of systems thinking. Applying DSRP is a new skill that extends and enhances popular systems thinking tools and approaches. DSRP provides a common language and analytical method to span the multiple subfields that have often worked in isolation, allowing the tremendous pluralism in systems thinking to exist alongside universality. Importantly, the simplicity of the DSRP rules makes it far easier to teach and learn systems thinking. The fourth wave makes systems thinking more accessible than ever before, as DSRP cognitive skills can be taught to individuals at all levels in all disciplines. The corollary development of systems modeling techniques are accessible ways to capture and measure one’s progress in developing the skills required for systems thinking. The historical overview and description of where the field is headed will provide context for an introduction to the role of systems thinking in human and organizational development and in particular the relevance for educational systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R. L., Magidson, J., & Addison, H. J. (2006). Idealized design: Creating an organization’s future. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Bateson, G. (1970). Lecture, “Form, Substance and Difference.” Delivered January 9, 1970. Institute of General Semantics. see: http://faculty.washington.edu/jernel/521/Form.htm
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: Dutton.
Bornhorst, C. (2015). “Thinkified” – How systems thinking can improve student outcomes in youth water education. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Apex Education.
Boyd, A., Geerling, T., Gregory, W., Kagan, C., Midgley, G., Murray, P., & Walsh, M. P. (2007). Systemic evaluation: A participative, multi-method approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1306–1320.
Burton, M. (2003). Review of systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice by Midgley G. (2000). Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 13(4), 330–333.
Cabrera, D. (2006). Systems thinking (Doctoral dissertation). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2012). Thinking at every desk: Four simple skills to transform your classroom. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2015). Systems thinking made simple: New hope for solving wicked problems in a complex world. Ithaca, NY: Odyssean Press.
Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2018). Systems thinking made simple: New hope for solving wicked problems in a complex world (2nd ed.). Ithaca, NY: Odyssean Press.
Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L., & Powers, E. (2015). A unifying theory of systems thinking with psychosocial applications. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2351
Cabrera, D., & Colosi, L. (2008). Distinctions, systems, relationships, and perspectives (DSRP): A theory of thinking and of things. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3), 311–317.
Cabrera, L., & Cabrera, D. (2016). Learning systems thinking at the graduate level: A case study in applying systems thinking to public policy. Special issue consisting of 14 articles dedicated to Systems Thinking/DSRP. Cornell Policy Review.
Cabrera, D. (2014). 58th Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences at the School of Business at George Washington University. Learning Across Boundaries: Exploring the Variety of Systemic Theory and Practice. Plenary Address. In Search of Universality in Systems Thinking. Washington, DC.
Capra, F. (2002). The hidden connections: Integrating the hidden connections among the biological, cognitive, and social dimensions of life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking. In Systems practice: Includes a 30-year retrospective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology, and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Churchman, C. W. (1968). The systems approach. New York, NY: Dell.
Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17, B37–B53.
Collins, B., Doskey, S., & Moreland, J. (2017). Modeling the convergence of collaborative systems of systems: A quantitative case study. Systems Engineering, 20(4), 357–378.
Dyer, W. (2013). The essential Wayne Dyer collection. Carlsbad, CA: Hay House.
Flood, R., & Jackson, M. (1991a). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Flood, R., & Jackson, M. (1991b). Critical systems thinking: Directed readings. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Forrester, J. W. (1971). World dynamics. Cambridge, Mass: Wright-Allen Press.
Francois, C. (2004). International Encyclopedia Of Systems And Cybernetics. 2nd edition ed. Munchen: K G Saur North Amer Research; 2004.
Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991). The roots of reductionism: A counter-ontoepistemology for a systems approach. Systems Practice, 4, 419–448.
Gregory, W. J. (1996). Discordant pluralism: A new strategy for critical systems thinking? Systems Practice, 9, 605–625.
Hall, A. D., & Fagen, R. E. (1956). Definition of system. General Systems, 1, 18–28.
Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations. New York, NY: Humanities Press.
Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems approaches to management. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
Jackson, M. C., & Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–486.
Joseph, D., & Newman, D. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 54–78.
Kambiz, E. M., & Robert, Y. C. (2000). Systems Thinking and Modelling: Understanding Change and Complexity. New York. Pearson Education.
Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy thinking: The new science of fuzzy logic. New York, NY: Hyperion.
Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268–273.
Latimer, C., & Stevens, C. (1997). Some remarks on wholes, parts and their perception. Psycoloquy, 8. http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?8.13. Accessed 7 July 2015.
Leleur, S. (2014). The meaning of system: Towards a complexity orientation in systems thinking. International Journal of Systems and Society, 1(1), 22.
Litman, J. A. (2009). Curiosity and metacognition. In C. B. Larson (Ed.), Metacognition: New research developments (pp. 105–116). Retrieved November 2, 2015, from http://drjlitman.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Litman-2009-invited-chapter.pdf
Marchal, J. H. (1975). On the concept of a system. Philosophy of Science, 42, 448–468.
Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions. New York, NY: Wiley.
Midgley, G. (1996). The ideal of unity and the practice of pluralism in systems science. In R. L. Flood & R. NRA (Eds.), Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
Midgley, G. (2003). Systems thinking. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Midgley, G., & Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (2001). Unfolding a theory of systemic intervention. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14, 615–650.
Mingers, J. C. (1992). What are real friends for? A reply to Mike Jackson. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 732–735.
Mingers, J. C. (1993). The system of systems methodologies–a reply to Schecter. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 206–208.
Mooney, L., Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (2007). Understanding social problems (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Mortensen, C. (1998). Perceptual cognition, parts and wholes. Psycoloquy, 9. http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?9.1. Accessed 8 July 2015.
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, Pellegrino, J. W. & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.), Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Peterson, M. A., & Skow-Grant, E. (2003). Memory and learning in figure-ground perception. In Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory: Cognitive vision (Vol. 42, pp. 1–35). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01001-6
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Schwarz, E. (1996). Streams of systemic thought. Neuchâtel, Switzerland. http://www.slideshare.net/CommunityActionHero/streams-of-systemic-thought. Accessed 8 July 2015.
Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective. Human Relations, 45, 637–657.
Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. Bern, Switzerland: Haupt.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1956). General systems theory. General Systems, 1, 1–10.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. London: Penguin.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Young, J. (2005). On insiders (emic) and outsiders (etic): Views of self, and othering. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18, 151–162.
Zhu, Z. (2011). After paradigm: Why mixing-methodology theorising fails and how to make it work again. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 784–798.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L. (2019). What Is Systems Thinking?. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
What Is Systems Thinking?- Published:
- 14 May 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-3
-
What Is Systems Thinking?
- Published:
- 14 February 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-2
-
Original
What Is Systems Thinking?- Published:
- 11 August 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_100-1