Abstract
Pediatric ulcerative colitis is a relatively common chronic illness of childhood, affecting approximately 25,000–50,000 children in the USA. The precise cause of ulcerative colitis remains unknown, but is believed to result from an interplay of genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors. Genes that may alter the risk of ulcerative colitis development include IL-23R, IL-26, and IL-10. Environmental factors that increase risk may include antibiotic exposure in early life and vitamin D deficiency. Diagnosis is established by colonoscopy with biopsy. Upper endoscopy and small-bowel imaging are also important to assist in differentiating ulcerative colitis from Crohn’s disease. Induction therapy of ulcerative colitis includes mesalamine (for milder cases), corticosteroids (for moderate disease), and antitumor necrosis factor antibodies and calcineurin inhibitors for steroid unresponsive disease. Maintenance therapy includes aminosalicylates, thiopurines, or antitumor necrosis factor antibodies. In severe or medically refractory cases, surgery (colectomy) should be considered.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Ulcerative colitis
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Thiopurine
- Corticosteroid
- Environment
- Infliximab
- Colonoscopy
Introduction
Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are the two most common forms of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). UC differs from CD in that the inflammation in UC is confined to the mucosal layer of the colon. In contrast, CD is characterized by transmural inflammation either in a limited region or extensively in the bowel, and may involve any portion of the gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to the anus. The peak incidence of IBD occurs between the ages of 15 and 25 years, but UC may begin at any age [1]. Approximately 20 % of the patients with UC present before the age of 20 years [2]. While children and adults develop similar symptoms, children often present with more extensive disease [3]. Clinicians caring for children and adolescents with UC must treat both the gastrointestinal and extraintestinal complications, optimize nutrition and linear growth, and address the psychosocial ramifications of the illness. Since the majority of the published studies investigating the natural history and treatment of UC are in adults, we refer primarily to these studies, with reference to pediatric studies where available.
Epidemiology
Most children with UC present between the ages of 10 and 18 years. However, UC in children under age 5 years is well described [1, 4, 5]. Epidemiologic studies primarily conducted in North America, the UK, and Scandinavian countries, suggest the incidence of UC in children ranges from 2.1 to 4.2 cases/year/100,000 population [6–11] (see Table 30.1). Although temporal trends vary between studies, the incidence of UC in children has remained relatively stable. In a systematic review of international trends in pediatric IBD incidence, of those studies with calculated statistical trends for CD incidence, 60 % reported a significant increase in CD incidence. In contrast, only 20 % of similar studies for UC reported a significantly increased incidence of UC [12]. Authors revealed a wide range of IBD incidence internationally and an absence of accurate estimates in most countries. The majority of incidence data for CD and UC in the pediatric population originates from geographic regions with higher rates of IBD [12].
Adult studies demonstrate that UC is more prevalent in North America, the UK, and Scandinavia and less common in southern Europe, Asia, and Africa [2]. The data suggest a north-to-south gradient with higher incidence rates of both CD and UC in northern locations, even within individual countries [13–15]. UC is more common among Jewish than non-Jewish peoples [16], but disease rates in people of Jewish origin vary by geographic region and parallel those of the general population [17]. The higher rates of IBD in individuals of Jewish origin across different countries support a common genetic predisposition; however, the geographic variation of IBD rates in Jews emphasizes that environmental factors (see below) influence the inherited risk .
Pathogenesis
No single cause of UC has been identified . Most likely, the disease results from a combination of the interplay of genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors. A widely accepted hypothesis suggests that in the genetically susceptible individual, a combination of host and environmental factors leads to the initiation and perpetuation of an abnormal intestinal immune response to gut flora, resulting in UC [18, 19]. In support of this theory, colitis in animals occurs in a wide variety of genetically altered rodents, including interleukin (IL)-2, IL-10, and T cell receptor knockout mice, and HLA-B27 transgenic rats [20]. Interestingly, most of these animal models do not develop colitis in germ-free environments. These findings suggest that multiple genes may contribute to the pathogenesis of IBD, and that interaction with the environment is essential .
Human Genetics
In humans, UC appears to have a non-Mendelian pattern of inheritance. Current evidence suggests that genes contribute less to the risk in individuals with UC than in those with CD. In a Danish twin cohort study and a Swedish twin cohort study, the calculated pair concordance rates among monozygotic twins were 14–19 % for UC and 50 % for CD, and among dizygotic twins, 0–5 % for UC and 0–4 % for CD [21, 22]. Although the concordance rates of disease are higher in monozygotic twins, the incomplete concordance suggests that nongenetic factors also contribute to the development of UC. First-degree relatives of patients with UC have a 9.5-fold increase in risk of developing UC, compared to the general population [23]. Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have implicated over 100 genes in the pathogenesis of IBD: Some of these genes exclusively predispose to CD, others to UC, and others to both diseases [24].
Among the GWA studies of UC, the most significant associations are found within the major histocompatibility complex class II region near HLA-DRA [25, 26]. Presently, the known genetic associations likely explain only approximately 20 % of the genetic contribution to IBD susceptibility [18].
Environment
Environmental factors may contribute to the development of UC. One mechanism of action by which environment may trigger IBD is by altering the microbiome . Pediatric studies demonstrate that the intestinal microbiota in children with IBD differs from that of the patients with non-IBD gastrointestinal conditions [27, 28]. However, it is difficult to ascertain whether the microbiome alterations cause the intestinal inflammation, or are epiphenomena. Nevertheless, there is good evidence that diet and other environmental factors may alter the microbiome in both animals and humans [29]. Most studies examining environmental risk factors have the limitations of retrospective, case-control methodology. One of the most consistent findings in multiple studies is the lower risk of UC among current smokers. Current smokers have approximately one half the risk of developing UC compared to nonsmokers [30, 31] .
Several authors have suggested that exposure to infections in the perinatal period or early life may contribute to the development of UC. Individuals with CD or UC were more likely to have experienced a diarrheal illness during infancy, when compared to their unaffected siblings [32]. Additional studies suggest associations between infectious gastroenteritis and development of pediatric or adult-onset UC [33–35]. Antibiotic usage in early childhood increases the risk of developing IBD, but the risk goes down as children grow older [36]. Appendectomy at a young age is associated with a lower risk of UC, but it may be the underlying appendiceal infection rather than the appendectomy itself that is the protective factor [37–39].
Other environmental factors that may affect the incidence of colitis include breastfeeding, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral contraceptives (OCPs), and vitamin D levels. The data on the association of breastfeeding and UC are inconclusive, with some published studies suggesting a protective effect [33, 40], and other studies showing no significant effect [32, 41, 42]. Some published reports suggest that NSAIDs may precede the onset of IBD, lead to a reactivation of quiescent IBD, or exacerbate already active IBD in humans [43–46]. Among past and current smokers, OCP use was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.63 (95 % CI 1.13–2.35) for UC compared to non-OCP users [47] .
There has been increasing interest in the potential immunomodulatory role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis of diseases such as IBD [48]. In a large prospective cohort study of women, higher predicted 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of incident CD, but only a nonsignificant decrease in the risk of UC.
Given the constant intestinal exposure to numerous luminal dietary antigens and the influence of dietary intake on the intestinal microbiota, investigators have long hypothesized a relationship between diet and UC [49, 50] . In a systematic review of case-control and cohort-based, nested case-control studies, authors examined macronutrients (fat, protein, carbohydrates) and specific foods (fruits, vegetables, meats), and the risk of IBD [51]. Increased dietary intake of total fats, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and meat were associated with an elevated risk of CD and UC. In contrast, high fiber and fruit intake were associated with a reduced risk of CD, whereas high vegetable intake was associated with reduced UC risk [51]. The sometimes conflicting results of multiple studies may reflect not only the potential methodological differences between studies, but also possibly the complexity of IBD pathogenesis itself [52]. Additional studies are needed to further define the potential role of diet in the pathogenesis of UC.
Immunology and Cell Biology
Activated cells of the mucosal immune system and elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines are present in the bowel of both UC and CD patients [18]. Previous studies implicate a dysregulation of activated intestinal ( cluster of differentiation, CD4 + ) T cell subtypes of the adaptive immune system in the pathogenesis of IBD. More recent studies however suggest CD and UC both may involve Th17 T cells, which rely upon the IL-23 pathway [18]. IL-23, an essential cytokine involved in the crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity [19], is secreted by macrophages and dendritic cells and promotes expansion of Th17 cells [19, 53]. Elevated levels of IL-23 and Th17 cytokines are detected in the colonic mucosa of UC and CD [18, 54, 55].
In more recent years, genetic studies such as GWA studies have revealed the importance of the epithelial barrier integrity in IBD pathogenesis [19]. GWA studies have discovered associations between UC and susceptibility single nucleotide polymorphisms in the HNF4A, CDH1, LAMB1, and GNA12 regions, important in epithelial barrier function [56, 57]. These findings suggest that a disruption in the integrity of the epithelial barrier may play a role in the pathogenesis of UC. Linkage and candidate gene studies have determined variants in the XBP1 gene, associated with the unfolded protein response for both UC and CD [57–61]. Closely linked to autophagy and innate immunity, the unfolded protein response is triggered by endoplasmic reticulum stress due to accumulation of misfolded or unfolded proteins and is associated with Paneth cell function [57].
Clinical Signs and Symptoms
The typical symptoms of UC include rectal bleeding, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. The presentation can vary depending upon the extent of colonic involvement and severity of inflammation . The colon in UC is inflamed in a diffuse continuous distribution, extending from the rectum proximally. By convention, UC is classified according to the extent of disease into the following three subgroups: proctitis (disease limited to the rectum), left-sided colitis (disease extending to the sigmoid or descending colon, but not past the splenic flexure), and pancolitis (disease extending past the splenic flexure). The Paris classification system is a more detailed system developed for pediatric IBD clinical studies and includes detailed categories for UC disease location and severity, age, and growth status [62, 63]. Proctitis may present with tenesmus, urgency, and the passage of formed or semiformed stool with blood and mucus [64]. In contrast, pancolitis or left-sided disease may present with bloody diarrhea and significant abdominal pain. The majority of patients will present with a several week history of symptoms; however, some will present with a more acute clinical picture.
Although adults and children with UC can present with similar symptoms, there are differences in the clinical presentation of these two populations. Studies suggest that children with UC present with more extensive colonic involvement than adults with UC [3, 4, 65]. In a Danish study of 80 patients less than 15 years and 1080 patients 15 years of age or greater with UC, the younger group had more extensive disease at diagnosis compared to the older group diagnosed with UC [3]. Of the UC patients younger than 15 years of age, 29 % had pancolitis and 25 % had proctitis; in contrast, of the UC patients 15 years or older, 16 % had pancolitis and 46 % had proctitis [3] . Gryboski examined 38 children diagnosed with UC at ≤ 10 years old and reported 71 % with pancolitis, 13 % with left-sided colitis, and 6 % with proctitis [4]. Approximately 5 % of the children with UC have evidence of delayed linear growth and/or weight loss at diagnosis, although growth failure is much less frequent than in children with CD [4, 66] (see Table 30.2).
Children with UC may present with varying degrees of disease severity. Approximately 50 % of the children with UC will present with a mild form of disease, characterized by an insidious onset of diarrhea and rectal bleeding, without abdominal pain or systemic symptoms such as fever. In these patients, disease may be confined to the distal colon [70, 71] . Disease of moderate severity is seen in 30 % of children with UC and is characterized by a more acute presentation with bloody diarrhea, tenesmus, and urgency; systemic symptoms including low-grade fever, abdominal tenderness, weight loss, and mild anemia may be present [70, 71]. Approximately 10 % of the children will present with a severe form of UC [70, 71]. Characteristic findings in severe disease include six or more bloody stools per day, fever, weight loss, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and diffuse abdominal tenderness on physical exam [70–72]. A very small percentage of children will present initially with extraintestinal symptoms or manifestations, without obvious intestinal symptoms [71]. These extraintestinal manifestations of IBD may include axial or peripheral arthritis, erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, or primary sclerosing cholangitis (see Sect. “Extraintestinal Manifestations”).
Diagnosis
The diagnosis of UC is established by the information gathered from a detailed symptom and family history, physical examination, and a combination of laboratory, radiologic, endoscopic, and histologic findings . It is important to exclude other etiologies such as an infectious process and to distinguish UC from CD. Colonic inflammation is typically characterized by bloody diarrhea with abdominal cramping. The differential diagnosis of colitis depends upon the age of the child at the time of evaluation. In infancy, necrotizing enterocolitis, Hirschsprung’s enterocolitis, and allergic colitis are diagnoses that should be considered. In children under age 3 who present with colitis, immunodeficiencies-causing colitis (such as IL-10 receptor deficiency and chronic granulomatous disease) should be excluded [73]. In contrast, in the older child and adolescent, enteric infection and idiopathic IBD are the most common diagnoses. (Causes of colitis are listed in Table 30.3.) In patients with painless rectal bleeding, other conditions (Meckel’s diverticulum, polyp) should be considered. In addition to details of the clinical presentation, the history should include family history, recent antibiotic therapy , infectious exposures, growth and sexual development, and the presence of extraintestinal manifestations of UC .
Physical examination should include assessment of height, weight, and body mass index; abdominal distension, tenderness, or mass; extraintestinal manifestations (e.g., aphthous stomatitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, uveitis, or arthritis); fecal blood on rectal exam, perianal abnormalities (e.g., fistulae, fissures, or tags). Findings on physical examination may help to distinguish UC from CD; for example, pronounced growth failure or a perianal abscess strongly suggests the diagnosis of CD. A severely ill child with UC may have tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension, fever, or dehydration. Such findings in the presence of abdominal distention and a concerning abdominal exam may herald a fulminant presentation of UC with increased risk of developing toxic megacolon.
Laboratory Assessment
Initial laboratory evaluation should include appropriate blood tests, stool for occult blood, C. difficile toxin assay, and stool cultures. A complete blood cell count with differential may reveal a leukocytosis with or without left shift, anemia, and thrombocytosis. Thrombocytosis, hypoalbuminemia , and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) may indicate increased disease activity [74–76]. The presence of anemia with low mean corpuscular volume (MCV), wide red cell distribution width (RDW) and low iron levels may indicate an iron-deficient anemia secondary to ongoing fecal blood losses or the anemia of chronic disease. Children with UC may also have normal blood test results at the time of diagnosis [77] .
Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin are frequently elevated in active UC [78, 79], and may be useful screening tests. Fecal biomarkers are elevated in patients with active UC and CD, but are not specific for IBD [80]. Fecal biomarkers cannot distinguish between different etiologies of mucosal inflammation and are increased in other conditions, including enteric infections [80]. Thus, enteric infections should be ruled out. Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin are the most commonly studied fecal biomarkers. In a meta-analysis of six adult and seven pediatric studies, among children and adolescents with suspected IBD, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of fecal calprotectin testing were 0.92 (95 % CI, 0.84–0.96) and 0.76 (95 % CI, 0.62–0.86), respectively [81] .
It has been proposed that certain serum antibodies may be helpful for screening for IBD and discriminating UC from CD [82, 83]. Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (p-ANCA) are seen in 60–80 % of adults with UC compared to 10–27 % of adults with CD [82, 84, 85]. Similarly, anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA) antibodies are commonly found in individuals with CD but are rarely seen in UC. In a study of 173 children, ASCA yielded a sensitivity of 55 % and specificity of 95 % for CD and ANCA had a sensitivity of 57 % and specificity of 92 % for UC [82]. In a study of 128 pediatric patients undergoing evaluation for IBD, Dubinsky and colleagues utilized modified cutoff values to optimize the sensitivity of the ASCA and ANCA assays. For the combination of ASCA and p-ANCA, the sensitivity of detecting IBD increased to 81 % with the modified values compared to the 69 % with standard cutoff values; however, this was accompanied by an increase in false positive rates among the children without IBD [83]. An overlap of ASCA and p-ANCA positive serology between patients with CD or UC remains. In particular, p-ANCA tends to test positive in the serum of patients with CD who exhibit UC features [82, 86]. Additional serological markers include antibodies to Escherichia coli outer membrane pori (OmpC), Pseudomonas fluorescens-associated sequence (I2), and flagellin (CBir1) [87]. In a study of greater than 300 children with suspected IBD, a serologic testing panel (including ASCA, p-ANCA, anti-OmpC and anti-CBir1) detected IBD with a sensitivity of 67 % and specificity of 76 %, compared to a sensitivity of 72 % and specificity of 94 % for a combination of three abnormal routine blood tests (hemoglobin, platelet count, and ESR) [87]. The value of these tests to supplement the routine diagnostic tests in IBD is a subject under study .
Endoscopic and Radiographic Evaluation
Evaluation with colonoscopy and ileoscopy with biopsies is the principal diagnostic test for UC. In patients with severe colitis, a limited flexible sigmoidoscopy examination with minimal air insufflation may be more appropriate, to avoid the risks of a full colonoscopy (perforation, hemorrhage, toxic dilatation). Upper endoscopy is also recommended by the “Porto” IBD Working Group of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). Small-bowel imaging should also be performed to exclude small-bowel involvement, which may change the diagnosis from UC to CD. Options for small-bowel evaluation include upper GI with small bowel follow through, computed tomography (CT) scan , or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) . The Porto expert panel has recommended MRI, over the other two modalities because of the absence of radiation; however, the quality of MRI varies from center to center, and small-bowel motion artifact may be sometimes confused with inflammation [88] .
In order to establish the extent of disease involvement by colonoscopy, we recommend biopsies from the terminal ileum and each segment of the colon, even if there are no visible findings at a particular level of the colon. In UC, typical findings seen by the endoscopist include a diffuse, continuous process starting at the rectum and extending more proximally into the colon. However, atypical features, such as rectal sparing, have been reported in children with UC [89–92]. In addition, UC patients with distal colitis can present with a “cecal patch,” discontinuous periappendiceal and cecal inflammation [92, 93]. The colonic mucosa often appears edematous, erythematous, and friable, with minute surface erosions and ulcerations (see Fig. 30.1). Larger, deeper ulcerations with associated exudate may develop in more severe disease. With long-standing UC, pseudopolyps may be present (see Fig. 30.2) [67]. In contrast, in CD, colonoscopy may reveal focal ulcerations (aphthous lesions) with intervening areas of normal-appearing mucosa (skip lesions). In severe or chronic CD, linear ulcerations, nodularity (cobblestoning), and strictures or stenoses may be present. In general, the ulcerations in CD are deeper and focal versus the diffuse, superficial ulcerations typical of UC (see Table 30.4) [89, 90, 94–97] .
Although by definition, the disease of UC is confined to the colon, children with CD or UC can have inflammation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. In a pediatric IBD registry study of 898 patients (643 with UC, 255 with CD colitis), authors examined the presence of macroscopic upper gastrointestinal involvement (ulcerations, aphthous lesions, or erosions) in accordance with the Paris classification system among the 260 patients with UC and 86 patients with CD colitis who underwent upper endoscopy with detailed documentation of lesions [62, 92]. Among the UC patients, gastric erosions were identified in 3.1 %, gastric ulcerations in 0.4 %, and erosions or ulcerations limited to the esophagus or duodenum in 0.8 %. In contrast, upper gastrointestinal lesions were noted in 22 % of the patients with Crohn’s colitis [92]. Except for the presence of granulomas of CD, it may be difficult to distinguish between UC and CD by the appearance of upper gastrointestinal lesions.
Plain abdominal radiographs and abdominal/pelvic CT scans evaluations may aid in the assessment for complications of UC, including toxic megacolon, perforation, or stricture. Plain abdominal radiograph may demonstrate thumbprinting, loss of haustral patterns, colonic dilatation (i.e., toxic megacolon), obstruction, or pneumoperitoneum (i.e., perforation of the bowel) [99–101] .
Pathology of Ulcerative Colitis
In active UC, typical findings on histopathology include a diffuse inflammatory cell infiltrate of the lamina propria mostly with plasma cells, lymphocytes, and neutrophils, but mast cells and eosinophils are also seen . Neutrophils invade the epithelium of the crypts, leading to cryptitis, crypt abscess formation, and goblet cell mucin depletion (see Fig. 30.3) [67]. The inflammatory infiltrate is typically confined to the mucosa, but in severe UC, ulceration may extend into the submucosa and deeper layers [96]. In quiescent (inactive) UC, the inflammatory infiltrate may diminish but signs of chronic colitis (architectural distortion, crypt branching and shortening, reduction in the number of crypts, and separation of crypts) can persist [96]. In children with UC, signs of chronic colitis (e.g., architectural distortion) are not always seen [91, 97].
Histologic differentiation of UC from CD can be difficult. The histologic hallmark of CD is the noncaseating granuloma, which may be found in 25–48 % of children with CD [98, 102, 103]. However, a giant cell reaction mimicking a granuloma can occur around damaged crypts and spilled mucin. These “mucin granulomas” must be distinguished from true granulomas, which by definition, are not seen in UC [96]. Histologic skip areas, rectal sparing, focal inflammation, and transmural inflammation also suggest the diagnosis of CD. However, in children, histological skip areas may occur both at initial presentation of UC and as a result of therapy [89, 91, 104]. Rarely, children with UC present with focal active colitis at initial presentation [91]. In addition, patients with UC can have histological evidence of upper gastrointestinal inflammation similar to that in CD [105–107]. Given the overlap of histopathology findings in UC and CD, it may be difficult to distinguish between these two diagnoses if granulomas are not present .
If a clinician cannot reliably distinguish between CD and UC based on the available clinical, radiographic, and endoscopic data, an interim diagnosis of IBD-unclassified (indeterminate colitis) may be given until the patient can be more clearly classified in the future. The ESPGHAN Porto group developed detailed criteria to better define the IBD-unclassified subtype [88]. The prevalence of IBD-unclassified in adults and children with IBD is estimated to be 10–20 % [65, 108]. Approximately one third of these patients will later be classified as UC or CD [109] .
Extraintestinal Manifestations
Approximately 25–30 % of the children and adolescents diagnosed with IBD develop extraintestinal symptoms [110–113]. Extraintestinal manifestations of IBD may occur before, during, or after the development of gastrointestinal symptoms and may appear after surgical removal of diseased bowel [110, 114–117] . The clinical activity of the extraintestinal manifestations may or may not correlate with the activity of intestinal inflammation.
Joint manifestations (arthropathy) occur in 5–20 % of the children with UC [4, 112, 114]. These can be classified into two main clinical forms: a peripheral arthropathy and an axial arthropathy (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis) [110, 114]. Patients with IBD develop peripheral arthropathies in approximately 5–20 % of the cases [110, 111, 114, 118]. The peripheral arthropathy generally is asymmetrical, nondeforming and migratory, affecting mostly the large joints of the lower extremities including the knees, ankles, and hips. Less commonly the upper limb joints or hands are affected [110, 114, 118]. Small joints of the hands and feet generally are spared [114] .
Exacerbations of peripheral joint disease seem to parallelly increase the activity of bowel disease in UC or CD. The pauciarticular arthropathy is more likely to be correlated with exacerbations of bowel disease [117].
Axial arthropathies associated with HLA B27 occur in 1–4 % of patients [110, 111, 114, 118]. Ankylosing spondylitis associated with IBD runs a course independent of the activity of bowel disease, and may progress to permanent deformity [110, 114, 118]. In addition to the two main forms of joint manifestations, individuals with UC can develop isolated arthritis involving large joints including the sacroiliac joints, hips, and shoulders [118].
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) and erythema nodosum (EN) are the two main skin manifestations associated with UC and CD. PG occurs in < 1–5 % of the patients with UC [111, 115] and often is associated with active disease and extensive colonic involvement [115, 119] . The classic PG lesion often begins as a discrete pustule with surrounding erythema, then extends peripherally to develop into an ulceration with a well-defined border and a deep erythematous to violaceous color [120]. The lesions of PG tend to be multiple and localize below the knees, and can develop at sites of trauma and previous surgical sites, including scars and ileostomy stomas [119–121]. Approximately 40 % of the patients with UC and PG also develop joint symptoms [69]. EN occurs more frequently with CD (27 %) in comparison to UC (4 %) [111] and usually coincides with increased bowel disease activity [69, 111, 118]. EN lesions appear as tender, warm, red nodules, or raised plaques and usually localize to the extensor surfaces of the lower extremities [122]. Both PG and EN can precede the development of bowel symptoms and PG can occur after bowel resection [69]. Other skin manifestations include Sweet’s syndrome (acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis) and oral lesions include aphthous lesions and pyostomatitis (pyoderma) vegetans [123] .
Ophthalmologic abnormalities are described in approximately 1–3 % of the children with IBD [110]. Uveitis and episcleritis are the more common ocular disorders reported [110, 124]. Uveitis associated with IBD in children may be asymptomatic, and thus, the incidence of associated eye findings may be underreported in the literature [125]. Ocular inflammation appears to develop more commonly in patients with other extraintestinal manifestations [125], including arthritis and may be associated with genes in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region [126]. In addition, corticosteroid use increases the risk of increased intraocular pressure and the development of posterior subcapsular cataracts [127, 128]. Given the potential eye complications, children with IBD should be monitored carefully at regular intervals .
Hepatic abnormalities in children with UC have been well described. While these are typically identified after the UC diagnosis, they may also precede the gastrointestinal symptoms [116, 129]. Transient elevations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) occur in 12 % of the children with UC and appear to be related to medications or disease activity [129]. Persistent ALT elevations suggest the presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or autoimmune chronic hepatitis [129]. Among children with UC, approximately 3 % develop sclerosing cholangitis and < 1 % develop chronic hepatitis [129, 130].
The diagnosis of PSC may be established through a combination of cholangiography and liver biopsy [131]. There is a paucity of the literature addressing the long-term outcome of children with PSC specifically associated with UC [129]. In children with PSC (with or without IBD), later age at presentation, splenomegaly, and prolonged prothrombin time at presentation were associated with poor outcome, defined as death or listing for transplantation [116]. Patients with UC and PSC are also at increased risk for developing colon cancer. Fatty changes of the liver observed on liver biopsies of patients with UC or CD may be secondary to malnutrition, protein losses, anemia, and corticosteroid use [132] .
The IBD population has a threefold overall increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with individuals without IBD [133–135]. VTE occurs in 1–2 % of the children and adolescents hospitalized for active IBD [136, 137]. Although the incidence of VTE appears less than the rate noted in the adult population, these events can result in significant morbidity for younger patients [135]. Thrombotic events range from clots associated with venous catheters to more significant events such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and cerebral vascular accidents. These events can lead to ongoing associated complications and long-term sequelae, including permanent neurologic deficits, persistent or recurrent thrombosis, embolization, and postthrombotic syndrome [136]. Factors that can further increase the risk for thromboembolism include an indwelling central venous catheter , severe disease activity, older age, parenteral nutrition, known thrombophilia, first-degree family history of VTE, persistence of anti-phospholipid antibody for greater than 12 weeks, oral contraceptives, smoking, obesity, and medications associated with increased risk of thrombosis such as thalidomide [136, 137] .
At a minimum, all hospitalized children and adolescents with IBD should maintain adequate hydration and receive mechanical thrombotic prophylaxis, such as encouraged ambulation, compression stockings, or pneumatic boots [137, 138]. The role of primary pharmacologic prophylaxis for thromboembolism remains controversial for children and adolescents with IBD. At our institution, we have implemented a risk stratification strategy to identify hospitalized IBD patients at higher risk for thrombosis, who warrant for primary prophylaxis pharmacologic anticoagulation therapy [136, 137]. For IBD patients who develop thromboembolism, anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin appears feasible without major sequelae of increased bleeding or complications [136] .
Rarely, other hematologic abnormalities associated with UC occur, including immune thrombocytopenic purpura [139] and autoimmune hemolytic anemia [140]. Osteopenia–low bone mineral density occurs in children with UC, but less often than in children with CD [141, 142]. Corticosteroid use increases the risk of osteopenia in children with IBD [141, 142]. Other extraintestinal manifestations include nephrolithiasis [111, 143], pancreatitis (related or unrelated to medications) [144, 145], and pulmonary and cardiac involvement [110] .
Complications
Complications of UC include massive hemorrhage, toxic megacolon, perforation of the bowel, strictures, and colon cancer . Massive hemorrhage can occur with severe UC and is managed with blood transfusions and treatment of the underlying UC, and urgent colectomy may be required. One consensus group suggested that an individual with UC who requires more than 6–8 units of blood in the first 48 h and is still actively bleeding should undergo a colectomy [146]. Colonic perforation is the most dangerous complication of UC, can occur in the setting of severe UC with or without toxic colonic dilatation [147–149], and requires urgent colectomy.
Toxic megacolon is a potentially life-threatening complication of UC and is characterized by total or segmental nonobstructive colonic dilatation of at least 6 cm in adults associated with systemic toxicity [148, 150, 151]. Previous reports suggest a lifetime risk of toxic megacolon complicating IBD of 1–5 %, but this has decreased more recently, probably secondary to earlier recognition and improved management of severe colitis [148, 152]. Most likely, the pathogenesis of toxic megacolon is multifactorial [148]. In contrast to typical UC, in which the inflammatory changes are limited to the mucosa, in toxic megacolon, the severe inflammation extends into the deeper layers of the colonic wall [147]. It is thought that the spread of the inflammatory process to the smooth-muscle layer may lead to the paralysis of the colonic smooth muscle and subsequent dilatation of the colon [148] .
Several triggering factors have been reported to precede the development of toxic megacolon [147, 148]. Medications that can impair colonic motility should be avoided and have been implicated as precipitating factors, including narcotic agents for pain or antidiarrheal effects, anticholinergic agents, drugs that decrease motility, or antidepressants with significant anticholinergic effects [147, 153, 154]. A barium enema or colonoscopy may cause distention that can further impair the colonic wall blood supply and may increase the mucosal uptake of bacterial products [148]. Barium enema examinations have been reported in proximity to the development of toxic megacolon [154, 155]. The early discontinuation or rapid tapering of steroids or 5-aminosalicylic acid agents may contribute to the development of toxic megacolon [147, 148] . Electrolyte abnormalities, such as hypokalemia, have been observed in the setting of toxic megacolon, though it is not clear whether this finding is a causative factor or secondary to the illness itself [147]. Along with colonic dilatation, patients with toxic megacolon present with systemic findings including fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis, and anemia [150]. A decrease in the number of stools may herald the onset of toxic megacolon. With progressive disease, these individuals can develop dehydration, mental status changes, electrolyte disturbances, hypotension, and increasing abdominal distension and tenderness, with or without signs of peritonitis [148, 150] .
Abdominal X-ray reveals colonic dilatation, most frequently involving the transverse colon, sometimes accompanied by inflammatory changes including absent or markedly edematous haustral pattern [156] (see Fig. 30.4). Because the transverse colon is the most anterior portion of the colon, air will tend to accumulate in this segment of the colon when the patient is in the supine position; however, with repositioning of the patient, the colonic air will redistribute, filling other segments of the bowel [157].
The management of toxic megacolon is detailed in multiple reviews elsewhere [147, 148]. If toxic megacolon is present, surgical consultation is essential and the patient will most likely require a colectomy. Early surgical intervention is indicated in the setting of failed medical therapy with progressive colonic dilatation, worsening systemic toxicity, perforation, or uncontrolled hemorrhage [148] .
Both benign and malignant colonic strictures can develop in long-standing UC [158–160]. Benign strictures present most commonly in the rectum and the sigmoid, are due to smooth muscle hypertrophy, and are thought to be potentially reversible [158]. Colonic strictures should be evaluated for possible malignancy, but the majority of strictures in UC are benign [158–160]. There is an increased risk of dysplasia and colon cancer in patients with long-standing UC, which is addressed later in this chapter (see Sect. “Prognosis/Follow-Up”).
Treatment Options
The treatment goals for children with UC are the control of active disease and induction of remission, the long-term maintenance of remission, and provision of education and psychosocial support for the patient and family. The initial treatment of UC is medical, with surgery reserved for patients with severe disease, patients with medically refractory disease, or patients who develop adverse effects of medical therapy .
Knowledge of the extent and severity of disease involvement will enable the clinician to choose the appropriate therapy for each individual patient. Distal UC (left-sided UC or proctitis) is characterized by involvement limited to the area distal to the splenic flexure, and potentially may be treated with topical agents (e.g., aminosalicylate or hydrocortisone enemas or suppositories). Extensive UC is defined by involvement extending proximal to the splenic flexure and requires systemic therapies with or without additional topical agents. Severity of disease is usually simple to ascertain, and can be determined by assessing stool frequency and consistency, abdominal pain, nocturnal diarrhea, hematocrit, albumin level, and feeding intolerance. Separate published disease severity criteria for adults and children have been developed by Truelove and Witts, and Werlin and Grand, respectively [72, 161]. Typically, severe colitis requires hospitalization and administration of either intravenous corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents (e.g., cyclosporine, tacrolimus, infliximab) . Many patients with severe colitis will require colectomy .
Turner and colleagues developed the pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index (PUCAI), a noninvasive, clinically based, validated instrument to assess disease activity in pediatric patients with UC [162]. The PUCAI is a score comprised of six parameters, including the assessment of abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, stool consistency, number of stools per 24 h, nocturnal stools, and activity level. Each item is assigned a value contributing to a combined, total PUCAI score ranging from 0 to 85. Categories of UC disease activity are defined by the following total PUCAI scores: 0–9 (no activity), 10–34 (mild activity), 35–64 (moderate activity), and 65–85 (severe activity). The PUCAI correlated well with the physician’s global assessment, Mayo score, and macroscopic findings at colonoscopy. In addition to excellent interobserver and test–retest reliability, the PUCAI performed well on longitudinal assessment with excellent responsiveness at repeated visits, thus providing a tool to serially assess patients’ clinical status [162]. Studies demonstrate the application and feasibility of the PUCAI in hospitalized pediatric patients with severe colitis and in the outpatient setting [163, 164]. Although the PUCAI provides a method to track UC disease activity, it does not replace the need for the appropriate serial thorough clinical evaluation of children and adolescents with active UC. Presently, there is no pediatric-specific UC endoscopic index available .
Induction Therapy
Mild to Moderate Colitis
In the child with mild to moderate UC, with no or only minimal systemic signs (such as elevated ESR or mild anemia), aminosalicylates (e.g., sulfasalazine, olsalazine, mesalamine, balsalazide) are usually the first line of therapy (see Tables 30.5 and 30.6).
Mesalamine is a 5-aminosalicylic acid compound used in the induction and maintenance treatment of UC. It was discovered as the active anti-inflammatory moiety of sulfasalazine, which has been used to treat UC since the 1940s [166]. More than 88 % of all the UC patients receive treatment with aminosalicylate (ASA) agents; however, fewer than 50 % of the children with UC can maintain long-term steroid free remission on ASA monotherapy [167]. Sulfasalazine contains mesalamine bound to sulfapyridine via an azo bond, which is released by bacterial azo-reductase in the small bowel and colon. Sulfapyridine is inactive, but is absorbed in the colon and is mostly responsible for hypersensitivity reaction and adverse effects associated with sulfasalazine [168].
ASA agents have multiple immunologic effects. Potential mechanisms of action include the inhibition of the synthesis of leukotriene B4, a potent chemotactic and chemokinetic agent, and the inhibition of the activation of nuclear transcription factor kappa B (NF-kappaB), an important mediator of the immune response in inflammatory processes [169–171].
Controlled studies suggest that currently available ASAs are superior to placebo for induction of remission and relapse prevention [172–175]. However, there do not appear to be any differences in efficacy between the older agent, sulfasalazine, and newer ASA drugs [175, 176].
Potential advantages of the non-sulfa ASA agents include better tolerance compared to sulfasalazine [176, 177] and the availability of a non-sulfa ASA agent for sulfa-sensitive individuals. In adult-onset UC, balsalazide at higher doses (6.75 g/day) may provide a faster improvement in active, mild-to-moderate UC than lower doses of balsalazide (2.25 g/day) or mesalamine (2.4 g/day) [178, 179].
Long-acting formulations of mesalamine are available, however there is no FDA approved pediatric dose. They are available as a delayed release multi-matrix formulation (Lialda) and a pH-controlled granule that releases mesalamine at pH > 6 (as in the colon, Apriso).
Common side effects of sulfasalazine include headache, nausea, and fatigue, which improve with reduction of the dose [180] (see Table 30.6). The sulfa moiety can cause hypersensitivity reactions resulting in rash, fever, hepatitis, hemolytic anemia, bone marrow suppression, and pneumonitis [180, 181]. Other side effects include neutropenia, oligospermia, pancreatitis, and the exacerbation of colitis [72, 182]. Folic acid supplementation is recommended given that sulfasalazine impairs the absorption of folic acid and may lead to anemia [180]. To decrease side effects, sulfasalazine is started at a dose of 10–20 mg/kg/day and gradually increased to the full dose (50–75 mg/kg/day) over 5–7 days mesalamine and the other non-sulfa ASA agents have also been associated with adverse reactions, including pancreatitis , hepatitis, nephritis, exacerbation of colitis, and pneumonitis [180, 183, 184].
Moderate Colitis
Children with moderate disease are usually managed with oral corticosteroids (usually 1 mg/kg/day, up to 60 mg/day of prednisone) as an outpatient. Corticosteroids are effective for short-term treatment, but up to 45 % of the pediatrics patients develop corticosteroid dependence in subsequent years putting them at risk for steroid-related side effects [185].
Potential short-term complications of steroid therapy in patients with UC include increased appetite, weight gain, fluid retention, mood swings, hyperglycemia, hypertension, insomnia, acne, and facial swelling. Complications of long-term steroid therapy (usually of greater than 3 months) include growth retardation, osteopenia with compression fractures, aseptic necrosis of the hip, and cataracts [180, 186]. Given these reasons and the suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, corticosteroids should be tapered shortly after remission is achieved. A standard taper utilized by the authors is reduction by 5 mg/week of prednisone down to 20 mg/day, and then a more gradual taper on alternate days, aiming for 10 mg every other day with further taper and cessation if remission is maintained [186]. The high frequency of side effects with traditional systemic steroids such as prednisone has led to the development of steroid preparations with high first-pass metabolism and few systemic effects.
Severe Colitis
Children with severe disease typically defined by a PUCAI greater than 65 (e.g., more than five bowel movements/day, liquid bloody stools, or severe pain with defecation, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia) require intravenous corticosteroids (methylprednisolone at 40–60 mg/day, divided into two doses/day, approximately 1–2 mg/kg/day) and hospitalization for further evaluation, observation, and management [187, 188]. Rectal corticosteroids or 5-ASA agents may be used as an adjunctive therapy with parenteral corticosteroids for patients with severe tenesmus [180]. Intravenous fluid for rehydration and correction of electrolyte imbalances should be provided. Blood transfusions and albumin infusions may be required. Although traditionally patients are restricted from taking food orally, there is no data to support holding the oral diet in UC as there is in CD; however, if bowel rest is indicated, the child may require central venous access for parenteral nutrition support [189, 190].
In addition to high-dose steroids, empiric antibiotics are sometimes used in severe colitis, though the efficacy of antibiotics has not been proven [191–194]. Assessment for response to intensive medical therapy includes resolution of fever, tachycardia, abdominal tenderness, and macroscopic blood per rectum. Stools should be decreasing in frequency, but may still be unformed. Following the PUCAI will help guide therapy. Once the child shows significant improvement, diet is advanced to a low-residue diet, intravenous methylprednisolone is switched to oral prednisone, and similar parameters for steroid wean are followed as outlined above. The optimal duration of intravenous corticosteroid therapy is unclear, but most children will respond within 7–10 days.
Approximately 50 % of the patients treated with intravenous corticosteroids will not respond. Turner and colleagues have published an excellent consensus statement on the use of rescue agents in the management of severe UC. In summary, the PUCAI can be utilized to track disease activity. If the child has not responded to steroid therapy (as assessed by a PUCAI drop of 20 points or more after 5–7 days), the options of surgery or more intensive immunosuppression (intravenous cyclosporine, infliximab, or oral tacrolimus) should be considered and discussed with the family. Intensive immunosuppression should not be started if surgery is believed imminent, such as in a septic patient, a patient with toxic megacolon, or a patient with a suspected perforation. Flexible sigmoidoscopy is indicated prior to the institution of calcineurin inhibitors or biologics to exclude cytomegalovirus [195].
The medical agents utilized to treat steroid refractory colitis in the hospitalized patient are calcineurin inhibitors and biologics. In the past decade, infliximab has been the agent most commonly utilized, perhaps due to its ease of administration and more favorable side-effect profile. Approximately 70 % of the children and adults treated with infliximab will respond [164, 196]. The role of monitoring infliximab levels during treatment of severe colitis is still a topic under study. However, patients with severe colitis may have an increased loss of infliximab in the stool, and may require higher more frequent dosing than the 5 mg/kg utilized in the clinical trials (which included less sick patients) [197]. Adalimumab also has been utilized in severe colitis [198]. Calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus are reasonable alternatives to biologics, and have been utilized for over 20 years. However, because of long-term renal toxicity, it is generally recommended that these agents be utilized as short-term induction agents for a few months, and that patients should transition to maintenance therapy with thiopurines or anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) agents [199]. Calcineurin inhibitors may also be utilized as a steroid sparing “bridge” to surgery [200]. The timing of colectomy in a child who is not responding to intravenous corticosteroids or other immunosuppression can be difficult. It should be emphasized that even if a child responds to immunosuppression, such as cyclosporine, there is a high likelihood that he/she will require a colectomy within a year [201, 202]. If immunosuppression with cyclosporine is used and the child does not respond to these medications within 10–14 days, surgery should be strongly recommended.
Close monitoring of the patients with severe colitis for the development of fulminant colitis and associated complications including hemorrhage, toxic megacolon, and perforation is essential using serial abdominal exams, complimented by serial abdominal films or other imaging as necessary. Physical examination should assess for evidence of worsening abdominal tenderness, distention, and hypoactive bowel sounds; these may herald the development of toxic megacolon. The appearance of persistent abdominal pain and distention, diffuse abdominal tenderness and rebound, fever and tachycardia are worrisome signs of an acute abdomen and may signal need for emergent surgical intervention. Opiates and loperimide should be avoided given the increased risk of developing toxic megacolon [153]. Steroid therapy may mask the typical symptoms and signs of perforation, but this may be detected by serial upright abdominal films (see Sect. “Complications”).
Left-Sided Colitis/Proctitis
Topical ASA or topical corticosteroids are effective in the treatment of proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, or left-sided UC [203–205] (see Tables 30.5 and 30.6 ). To be effective, topical therapy must reach the most proximal extent of the disease activity. Mesalamine enemas or suppositories are effective as first-line/maintenance therapy for mild or moderately active left-sided UC or proctitis, respectively [180]. Rectal mesalamine may be superior to oral mesalamine in the treatment of active ulcerative proctitis [206]. Mesalamine enemas may be superior to rectal corticosteroids [207] and are also effective in treating distal colitis that is unresponsive to oral ASAs or corticosteroids [208, 209]. Combination therapy with oral and topical mesalamine is more effective than one agent alone in the treatment of mild to moderate distal colitis [210]. Mesalamine suppositories spread to the upper rectum, and enemas and foams can reach the splenic flexure or into the distal transverse colon [208, 209].
Corticosteroid suppositories or enemas also can be used as first-line induction therapy in patients with mild or moderately active ulcerative proctitis or left-sided UC [180]. Rectal administration of hydrocortisone or prednisolone permits more direct delivery of steroids to distal UC sites; however, as with oral steroid therapy, prolonged treatment with topical steroids may induce systemic steroid side effects, including adrenal suppression [205, 209]. Topical agents such as budesonide enemas may induce remission in distal colitis with fewer systemic steroids side effects [211, 212]. Some evidence suggests that ASA enemas may be superior to hydrocortisone enemas [204, 207, 209].
Maintenance Therapy
5-Aminosalicylic Acid Agents
Medication for the prevention of relapse after induction of remission often is started before the induction therapy is discontinued. The clinician usually aims to transition a patient from corticosteroids onto sulfasalazine or another ASA agent. Multiple studies of adults with UC demonstrate the effectiveness of sulfasalazine and other ASA agents in preventing relapse [176]. Mesalamine is well-tolerated in the long-term treatment of children with IBD, with the principal adverse event being exacerbation of diarrhea [213]. Sulfasalazine and newer ASAs are all effective in maintaining remission in UC [177]. Balsalazide, at a higher dose (6 g/day), also may be more effective in preventing relapses of UC in adults, compared to lower-dose balsalazide (3 g/day) and mesalamine (1.5 g/day) [214]. Topical mesalamine can effectively prevent relapse of active distal UC [215], but because of the rectal route of administration, patients may prefer oral mesalamine for maintenance therapy. The combination of oral and topical ASA therapy may be more effective in preventing relapse than oral ASA therapy alone, especially for distal disease [216]. Children with UC require years of maintenance therapy. The exact duration that a UC patient in remission should remain on maintenance therapy is unclear, and there are no formal guidelines on when or if maintenance therapy should be discontinued. The risk of discontinuing maintenance medication is the possibility of relapse. In addition, maintenance with ASA or other agents may reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia [217–219].
6-Mercaptopurine and Azathioprine
The immunomodulatory drugs, azathioprine (AZA) and its metabolite 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), can reduce disease activity and allow the withdrawal of steroid therapy in children with steroid-dependent UC [220, 221].
AZA is nonenzymatically metabolized to 6MP, and the two drugs have identical mechanisms of action. AZA is 55 % 6MP by molecular weight and therefore dosed higher mg per kg. As AZA is the prodrug of 6MP, the dose of AZA is approximately twice that of 6MP [222]. The mechanism of action of 6MP and AZA is to interrupt RNA and DNA synthesis, thereby downregulating cytokines, T cell activity, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions and by inducing T cell apoptosis by blocking the activation of the gene rac-1 [223].
The use of thiopurines in UC as steroid sparing maintenance agents is long established. Given their steroid-sparing effects [220, 221] and reasonable tolerance by children with IBD [224], AZA and 6MP offer an alternative maintenance treatment of IBD in children. A prospective multicenter registry study in pediatric UC patients found 50 % of children with UC starting thiopurine therapy were disease free 1 year later, without the need for rescue therapy [225].
The metabolism of AZA/6MP is well established. AZA is converted to 6MP, and then to 6-thiouric acid (6-TUA), 6-methyl mercaptopurine (6-MMP), and 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) [226, 227]. Evaluation for thiopurine methyltransferase genetic polymorphism should be obtained prior to the institution of 6MP or AZA therapy as it can identify those children at higher risk for drug toxicity [228] and the starting dose of thiopurine can be adjusted accordingly. The 6-TGN moiety is thought to be the active component responsible for the inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation by DNA breakage. There is data demonstrating increased 6-TGN level correlating with increased response to therapy in IBD, with increased 6-TGN levels associated with clinical remission [229]. Dosage can be adjusted using metabolite levels. as the target 6-TGN level is found to be 235 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells and 6-MMP level < 5700 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells [230, 231]. The 6-MMP fraction is thought to be responsible for the hepatotoxic effects of AZA and 6MP [222, 229, 231, 232]. A 6-MMP level > 5700 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells is found to lead to a threefold increase risk of hepatotoxicity [231].
Allopurinol is a xanthine oxidase inhibitor used to treat gout as its primary indication. In patients that shift the breakdown of 6MP and AZA preferentially towards an increased 6-MMP fraction, the addition of allopurinol allows a lower dose of AZA/6MP with increased 6-TGN levels and lower comparative 6-MMP fraction. There is limited published data for dosage in pediatric IBD patients [233].
An alternate approach to maximize 6MP/AZA effect in patients with elevated transaminases due to preferential metabolizers of thiopurines is split dose administration. The total daily dose is the same, but divided into two equivalent doses, and this is found to decrease transaminases as well as flu-like symptoms which can be seen with 6MP/AZA use. This has been demonstrated in a retrospective adult study, and has been used in the pediatric UC population [234].
Given the high relapse rate with withdrawal of 6MP in adults with UC [235], the majority of children requiring AZA or 6MP to suppress disease activity most likely will require long-term maintenance therapy with these agents. There are no good data in UC addressing the question of when (or if) immunomodulators should be discontinued after a patient has entered remission. Most patients are continued on the medication for several years if they respond to 6MP or AZA. There is an approximate fourfold increase risk of lymphoma in IBD patients treated with AZA or 6MP. It is unclear if this is due to the medications themselves or due to the severity of the underlying disease [236]. In addition, there is a slightly increased risk of Epstein–Barr virus associated lymphoma in a large cohort of patients treated with long-term 6MP or AZA [237].
Methotrexate
Methotrexate (MTX) is a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor used for induction and maintenance in patients with CD [238]. At low dose, MTX’s mechanism of action is not clearly defined. At high doses, it works through antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects by inhibiting dihydrofolate reductase, leading to defective DNA synthesis and cell death [239]. At low doses, it works primarily as an immunomodulator [240]. The mechanism of action as an immunomodulator is not clearly understood but involves adenosine inhibition, induction of apoptosis, and decreased IL and eicosanoids to decrease inflammatory mediators [241–243].
There is some evidence from open label trials in adults to suggest the use of MTX monotherapy as maintenance in UC, but there is very little supportive data in the pediatric population. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of MTX use in adults with chronic active UC found weekly oral MTX at 12.5 mg to be no better than placebo in induction or maintenance of remission in patients with chronic active UC [244]. A small retrospective pediatric paper reported response or remission in 72, 63, and 50 % of patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively [245]. Larger controlled prospective trials would be needed to show clear benefit for MTX monotherapy in pediatric UC patients [246].
Biologic Agents
Infliximab
Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha which is a cofactor in the production of inflammatory cytokines, gamma interferon, and IL-2 [247, 248]. The efficacy of infliximab in pediatric patients was demonstrated in “the REACH trial” which was a prospective trial demonstrating 73 % response at 8 weeks in pediatric UC patients with moderate to severely active UC using 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, followed by either every 8 week or every 12 week dosing interval. The response at 54 weeks in the every 8-week group was double that of the every 12-week maintenance group [249, 250].
Combination therapy with infliximab plus AZA has been shown to be more effective in an adult study [251] with better response of steroid free remission at 16 weeks in the combination therapy group. There are no similar studies in the pediatric patient population [251]. The potential risks of combination therapy including the possible development of lymphoma as previously discussed and the above data make the risk-versus-benefit evaluation of combination therapy critical.
Adalimumab
Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to tumor necrosis factor-alpha. It was approved for adults with UC in 2012. It is currently not approved for use in pediatric UC patients. The adult literature comparing adalimumab to placebo prospectively showed a superior response of clinical remission in treatment group at both week 8 (17 vs. 9 %) and week 52 (17 vs. 9 %), respectively. Anti-TNF naïve patients had double the response to therapy compared to placebo as well (21 vs. 9 % at week 8 and 22 % vs. 10 % at week 52, respectively) [252].
Vedolizumab
Vedolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically recognizes alpha-4 beta-7 integrin, a cell survive glycoprotein variably expressed on circulating B and T lymphocytes. This interacts with mucosal addressin-cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) [253] on intestinal vasculature [254, 255]. Vedolizumab has been found more effective than placebo for induction and maintenance therapy for UC. In randomized placebo-controlled adult studies, induction response was 47 % compared with 25.5 % in placebo at 6 weeks, and maintenance response was achieved in 41.8 % in treatment group at every 8 weeks, 44.8 % at every 4 weeks at 300 mg compared with 15.9 % in placebo group. There was a similar frequency of adverse events in both treatment groups and placebo groups. This effect appears to be more effective in patients who have previously lost response to anti-TNF therapy [256].
Other Therapies
Antibiotics
Despite the potential role of infectious agents in the pathogenesis of UC [20], the use of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of UC remains controversial. There is a lack of consistent evidence in the effectiveness of antibiotics in the induction and maintenance of remission in UC [192, 257–260]. In one study, oral tobramycin therapy improved short-term clinical and histological outcomes, [257] but there was no advantage in the prevention of relapse compared to placebo [258]. In two studies of active UC, the addition of 10–14 days of oral or intravenous ciprofloxacin to corticosteroid therapy did not improve rates of remission [194, 261]. In another placebo-controlled study, 6 months of treatment with ciprofloxacin, in addition to standard therapy with prednisone and mesalamine, resulted in a greater clinical response compared to placebo; however, this advantage was not sustained after the cessation of ciprofloxacin [262]. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics often are administered in the setting of severe active UC [72, 191], especially if there is concern for potential fulminant colitis or toxic megacolon [148].
Tofacitinib
Tofacitinib is an oral inhibitor of Janus kinase 1, 2, and 3, which is expected to block signaling involving gamma chain-containing cytokines including IL 2, 4, 7, 9, 15, and 21. These cytokines are integral to lymphocyte activation function and proliferation. Blocking a common signaling molecule is thought to suppress both T and B cells, while maintaining regulatory T cell function [263–265]. Tofacitinib was found to be more effective than placebo in a prospective phase-2 trial of 194 adults with clinical response found in 78 % in the higher dose treatment group compared to 42 % in the placebo group. Clinical remission was seen in 41 % in the higher dose treatment group versus 10 % in placebo group [266].
Mycophenolate
Mycophenolate mofetil is an immunosuppressant used in transplant therapy and is a reversible inhibitor of purine biosynthesis, necessary for the growth of T cells and B cells [267]. There have been several small studies in adult literature showing some efficacy in treating UC, particularly when other medications such as infliximab and AZA have failed [268]. A retrospective review of adult UC patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil demonstrated 81 % in remission at 8 weeks and 58 % in sustained response at 6 months. Side effects were experienced in 19 % of the patients, the majority of which were managed with dose reduction. There may be utility in patients who fail other treatment regimens, but more data is needed [269]
Probiotics
There are data and controversy on use of probiotics in UC. VSL#3 is a product comprised of four strains of lactobacilli, three strains of bifidobacteria and one strain of Streptococcus, and has been shown to be effective in preventing pouchitis in UC patients after colectomy [270]. In a prospective, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial in 29 children, VSL#3 was superior to placebo in protracting relapse-free remission [271]. The question of use of probiotics for inducing remission in UC remains controversial. A meta-analysis of all available studies in adult literature demonstrated that VSL#3 is beneficial for maintaining remission in patients with pouchitis, and that probiotics show additional benefit in inducing remission of UC [272]. Larger prospective pediatric studies are needed to fully define probiotic use for induction and maintenance of remission in pediatric patients with UC.
Fish Oil
Several placebo-controlled studies suggested a benefit of adjunctive therapy with fish oil supplementation containing eicosapentaenoic acid, a potent inhibitor of leukotriene B-4 synthesis, in the treatment of active UC [273–275]. However, fish oil supplementation did not appear to show any benefit in maintenance therapy [275, 276].
Randomized, controlled trials in adults with active distal UC suggest that therapy with topical short chain fatty acid preparations result in clinical symptomatic improvement, but there is no statistically significant advantage in comparison to placebo [277–279].
Nutritional Therapy
The importance of nutrition in the management of UC is extensively reviewed elsewhere [280, 281]. There is data to support the use of enteral therapy for induction of remission in CD, but the same response is not seen with UC [282, 283]. Children with UC can develop nutritional deficits with poor oral intake secondary to symptoms, and thus, promotion of continued good nutritional intake is essential for appropriate healing and nutritional repletion [284]. Enteral nutrition is preferred to total parenteral nutrition when possible. In contrast to CD, enteral nutrition is not an effective primary therapy for active UC [180, 285]. Studies suggest no advantage of total nutritional support and bowel rest in addition to conventional medical therapy alone in the treatment of UC [189, 190]. Total parenteral nutrition is often utilized for nutritional repletion in severe UC colitis, especially if the patient is developing severe cramps and diarrhea when challenged with enteral nutrition.
Surgical Therapy
In the majority of cases, medical therapy remains the first-line treatment for UC. However, colectomy may be required for patients with severe or medically refractory disease, or to prevent colon cancer. Since the inflammation in UC is limited to the colon, colonic resection will most often result in resolution of symptoms. However, colectomy is not without potential complications, such as the development of pouchitis in patients who undergo ileo-anal anastomosis [286, 287]. It is important to consider timely surgical intervention in the appropriate setting to avoid complications of UC. Indications for colectomy in a patient with UC include fulminant colitis or a complication of colitis, such as massive hemorrhage, perforation, or toxic megacolon; medical therapy failure; steroid dependency, which may lead undesired to side effects; and the presence of colonic dysplasia [288]. Prepubertal children may experience catch-up growth after colectomy forUC. In one series, 11 of 18 children increased their median height velocity from 3.85 cm/year preoperatively to 7.35 cm/year postoperatively [289].
There are no early predictors to help determine who will proceed to colectomy. In a retrospective review of 73 children with UC between the ages of 1–18 years, the combination of steroid dependency and pancolitis was associated with an increased need for colectomy [290]. Seventy-three percent of the children with steroid dependent pancolitis required colectomy within 3 years of diagnosis [290].
Except in the setting of emergent colectomy, a complete evaluation should be performed to ensure there is no evidence of CD prior to colectomy. If there is evidence suggesting the possibility of CD, the patient and family need to be informed of the potential for postoperative recurrence, and the relative contraindications of ileoanal pull through procedures in patients with CD. The authors recommend small-bowel imaging and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, in addition to a full ileo-colonoscopy, if there is no clinical contraindication. Prior endoscopies and pathology reports should be carefully reviewed to establish that there is no evidence of CD.
The surgical options available for UC are reviewed in detail elsewhere [288]. The ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IPAA) is the operation most commonly performed in the majority of patients with UC. The IPAA removes the entire colon and the rectal mucosa, avoids permanent ileostomy, and preserves anorectal function. Several types of ileal pouches can be constructed including the J-shaped, S-shaped, W-shaped, and the lateral–lateral pouch [288]. The J pouch design is now most commonly used for the IPAA operation [291, 292]. If the rectal mucosa is in good condition, many centers use the two-stage operative approach. During the first stage, a subtotal colectomy of the cecum to proximal rectum, the removal of the distal rectal and proximal anal mucosa, and the formation of the ileal pouch are performed. In this initial stage, a diverting loop ileostomy is performed in order to allow the pouch to heal. The second stage involves closure of the loop ileostomy with restoration of fecal flow to the pouch. Surgeons at some surgical centers also complete the IPAA in one stage, without the loop ileostomy [293]; however, this would not be the procedure of choice in patients receiving high dose corticosteroids [292].
If the patient presents for emergent surgical intervention, such as with fulminant colitis, a three-stage operative approach is often utilized. At the time of acute presentation, a subtotal colectomy is performed with formation of a rectal stump (the so-called Hartman pouch) and Brooke ileostomy. After the first operation, the rectal mucosa is treated with topical therapies (e.g., hydrocortisone, aminosalicylates) to induce mucosal healing. At the second operation, the distal rectal and proximal anal mucosa is removed and the ileal pouch is created. The ileostomy is reversed at the third operation.
The potential complications of IPAA include small-bowel obstruction, pelvic sepsis, anastomotic leak, fecal incontinence, pouchitis, strictures, fistulae, and reduced fertility in females [288, 294–296]. The development of fistulae raises the suspicion of CD [288]. In one series of children aged 9–16 who underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA, 12/29 (41 %) of patients with UC developed early complications (wound infection, early bowel obstruction, prolonged fever) [297]. Late complications (bowel obstruction, pouch fistula) occurred in 11/29 (38 %) and pouchitis developed in 9/29 (31 %) of the children with UC. Median follow-up was 4 years (range from 6 months to 9 years). In this same study, daytime continence was noted in 100 % and nighttime continence in 93 %. The median frequency of bowel movements was 4 per 24 h, and 7 % of the patients had nighttime bowel movements.
Pouchitis, or inflammation of the newly created reservoir, is the most significant chronic complication in UC patients undergoing IPAA and as many as 44–53 % of the children and young adults with UC and ileo-anal anastomosis will develop pouchitis on long-term follow-up [286, 287]. The etiology of pouchitis is unknown, but theories involve the role of genetic susceptibility, fecal stasis, bacterial overgrowth , disruption of the balance of luminal bacteria, nutritional deficiencies, ischemia, and IBD recurrence [298]. Symptoms of pouchitis include diarrhea, rectal bleeding, abdominal cramping, urgency and incontinence of stool, malaise, and fever [288, 298, 299]. Laboratory studies may demonstrate anemia and an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The definitive diagnosis is established by flexible endoscopy of the pouch with biopsies (see Fig. 30.5). In some patients, a contrast enema may be useful in identifying fistulae.
Broad-spectrum antibiotics are usually the first-line treatment for pouchitis [298, 300]. Metronidazole is the most commonly used antibiotic, but alternative therapies include ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, erythromycin, and tetracycline [299, 301]. If there is no improvement with antibiotics, other options include mesalamine enemas and steroid enemas or oral therapy with mesalamine, sulfasalazine, or steroids [299, 302, 303]. Other therapies examined include cyclosporine enemas, short chain fatty acid enemas, butyrate suppositories, and glutamine suppositories [299, 304–306]. Probiotic therapy may prevent the onset of acute pouchitis after ileostomy closure [270] and effectively maintain remission after chronic pouchitis [307]. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of the probiotic preparation VSL#3 compared with placebo in maintenance of remission of chronic pouchitis in 40 patients in remission. Three patients (15 %) in the VSL#3 group had relapses within the 9-month follow-up period, compared with 20 (100 %) in the placebo group [307]. In another double-blind, placebo-controlled study performed by the same authors in 40 patients, VSL#3, administered immediately after ileostomy closure for 1 year, effectively reduced the onset of acute pouchitis in the VSL#3 group (10 %) in comparison to the placebo group (40 %) [270].
Several studies suggest that the risk of dysplasia in the ileal pouch appears to be low [308, 309] and may be associated with chronic pouchitis [310]. The development of adenocarcinoma has been reported in the ileal pouch [311]. In a follow-up study (mean of 5 years) of 76 children and adolescents with UC who had ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, no dysplasia was identified in screening pouch biopsy specimens [308]. The authors caution that the long-term risk of development of dysplasia is not yet known and recommend screening of the pouch for dysplasia. In the rare patient who has undergone an ileo-rectal anastomosis without rectal mucosectomy, surveillance of the rectum should be performed to screen for rectal cancer.
Psychosocial Support
The social impact of UC on the lives of children with the disease needs to be considered. UC often has its onset in adolescence , a time when body image issues are paramount. Children and teens with IBD often may experience anxiety over the diagnosis of a chronic disease, the need for invasive procedures, and the uncertainty of the future. In addition, there may be struggles with parents about proper diet, and “medication fatigue” from having to take more than ten pills per day. Social, school-related, and extracurricular activities may be affected and may need appropriate modification. For example, a self-limited reduction of physical education activities and permission for special bathroom privileges may be needed.
Previous studies report an increased risk of psychiatric and behavioral issues in children with IBD, including depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem [312–317]. The physician caring for these patients needs to openly discuss the above issues with the patient and family, and be alert to the possibility that a patient may develop anxiety or depressive symptoms. Two patient-generated, disease-specific, health-related quality of life questionnaires for children with IBD have been validated, the IMPACT and Impact-II questionnaires [318, 319]. Impact-II and more recent Impact-III are modified versions of the IMPACT questionnaire. The use of these instruments may provide important information to improve the care of children with IBD. Referral to an educational support group, such as those sponsored by the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America (www.ccfa.org), may be very helpful for patients and their families.
Prognosis/Follow-Up
Whether children with UC are treated medically or surgically, they have an excellent long-term prognosis and a good quality of life. The majority of children with UC respond to medical therapy. In one US retrospective study of 171 children ranging in age from 1.5 to 17.7 years, diagnosed with UC between 1967 and 1994, 43 % had mild disease at presentation and 57 % had moderate or severe UC. With treatment, 70 % of all the children were in remission within 3 months of diagnosis and by 6 months, 90 % of the children with mild disease and 81 % of the children with moderate to severe UC experienced resolution of their symptoms. In each yearly follow-up period, approximately 55 % of the children were symptom free, 38 % experienced chronic intermittent symptoms, and 7 % had continuous symptoms [320]. In this same study, children with mild UC at presentation had a lower frequency of colectomy than children with moderate to severe UC (9 vs. 26 % at 5 years, respectively). Patients with left-sided disease had comparable rates of colectomy at 5 years as patients with pancolitis [320]. However, the authors cautioned that the number of patients in each subgroup of disease extent was small and a true difference in colectomy rates may have been missed secondary to insufficient power of the study [320].
Limited distal UC (proctitis or proctosigmoiditis) diagnosed in adults and children can extend further to involve more proximal colon with time [69, 321–323]. In a retrospective evaluation of 85 patients under 21 years of age, diagnosed with UC proctosigmoiditis between 1958 and 1983, the extension of disease was to the descending colon in 20 % and to the hepatic flexure or beyond in another 38 % of the patients [69].
Individuals with long-standing UC are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) [324–326]. Risk of CRC increases with more extensive colonic involvement, and longer duration of disease since diagnosis [324–328]. Thus, children with UC potentially will be at risk for CRC over a longer period of time, compared to individuals with adult-onset UC. In a recent Danish population-based cohort study, the risk of CRC among patients with UC was similar to the risk among the general population. The authors highlighted a decrease in the rate of CRC risk among patients with UC between 1979 and 2008. However, certain subgroups of UC patients, including those who were diagnosed in childhood or adolescence, experienced a longer duration of disease, or had PSC, remained at elevated risk of CRC [329]. Individuals with PSC and UC have a higher risk of developing colorectal neoplasia compared to those with UC alone and of developing cholangiocarcinoma [330–332]. Ursodeoxycholic acid may decrease the risk for developing colorectal dysplasia or cancer in patients with UC and PSC [333]. However, high doses of ursodeoxycholic acid may increase the risk of colorectal neoplasia in these patients [334]. Other risk factors reported for CRC in patients with UC include a family history of sporadic CRC and the presence of colonic stricture, shortened colon, or inflammatory pseudopolyps [335–337].
Some retrospective studies suggest that ASA agents may provide a protective effect in the development of CRC in patients with UC, but not all studies support these findings [217–219, 338, 339].
Presently, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of purine immunomodulators in the chemoprevention of CRC in patients with UC [337, 340]. There are no randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy for dysplasia and CRC in patients with UC [337]. In 2010, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) published updated recommendations for surveillance colonoscopy in adults with IBD [337, 341]. An initial screening colonoscopy 8 years after onset of symptoms is advised in all patients with UC to reassess the extent of disease with multiple biopsies obtained throughout the entire colon. The CRC surveillance interval is determined by the true extent of disease, defined by the most proximal extent of disease identified histologically at any point in time [337]. Patients with isolated ulcerative proctitis are not considered at increased risk for IBD-related CRC. Therefore, after the initial screening colonoscopy, they do not require surveillance colonoscopy based upon their UC. Patients with extensive (extent proximal to splenic flexure) or left-sided colitis should commence surveillance colonoscopy within 1–2 years after the initial screening [337]. Patients with UC and PSC should initiate colonoscopy surveillance at time of diagnosis and continue with yearly examinations thereafter [337].
Chromoendoscopy improves the detection of dysplastic lesions by enhancing the visualization of mucosal irregularities [337]. In expert hands, chromoendoscopy optimizes the detection of mucosal abnormalities for appropriate targeted biopsies and reduces the need for random biopsies [342, 343]. If colonoscopy is performed without chromoendoscopy, surveillance should include careful inspection of the mucosa with targeted biopsies of any suspicious lesions and random biopsies from each anatomic section of the colon [337]. There are no prospective studies available to define the ideal number of random biopsies required to reliably detect colorectal neoplasia. Consensus recommendations suggest that biopsy specimens should be taken every 10 cm in all four quadrants [337]. It is not clear whether surveillance practice should differ for patients with younger-onset UC. There are no published formal recommendations to guide surveillance colonoscopy in children [344]. The AGA recommends that surveillance colonoscopy should be performed as frequently in children and adolescents as in adults and should be determined by the duration of disease [337]. Guidelines for surveillance colonoscopy for neoplasia in IBD patients continue to evolve.
Conclusion
UC in children presents in a similar manner to that in adults, though children often have more extensive disease at diagnosis. Once the diagnosis is established, by colonoscopy , the first line of induction treatment in mild disease is usually an aminosalicylate, with corticosteroids reserved for moderate to severe disease. If a patient responds to induction therapy, the maintenance agent most commonly used is an aminosalicylate or 6-mercaptopurine. In severe steroid unresponsive colitis, the clinician is faced with the challenge of recommending either colectomy or more aggressive immunosuppression (e.g., infliximab, tacrolimus, cyclosporine). Even if a patient responds to cyclosporine or tacrolimus, there is a high likelihood of proceeding to colectomy within a year. Surgery will eradicate the disease, but patients may develop chronic pouchitis requiring additional medical treatment. In addition to medical care of these patients, nutritional counseling, monitoring of growth, and psychosocial support are essential. If the medical team can give proper care and support, the patient’s long-term prognosis is usually excellent.
Abbreviations
- 6MP:
-
6-mercaptopurine
- 6-TUA:
-
6-thiouric acid
- 6-MMP:
-
6-methyl mercaptopurine
- 6-TGN:
-
6-thioguanine nucleotide
- 25(OH)D:
-
25-hydroxy vitamin D
- AGA:
-
American Gastroenterological Association
- ALT:
-
Alanine aminotransferase
- Anti-TNF-α:
-
Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha
- ASA:
-
Aminosalicylate
- ASCA:
-
Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- ASA:
-
Aminosalicylate
- AZA:
-
Azathioprine
- CBir1:
-
Flagellin
- CD:
-
Crohn’s disease
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CRC:
-
Colorectal cancer
- CRP:
-
C-reactive protein
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- EN:
-
Erythema nodosum
- ESPGHAN:
-
European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition
- ESR:
-
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
- GWA:
-
Genome-wide association
- HLA:
-
Human leukocyte antigen
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- HLA:
-
Human leukocyte antigen
- IBD:
-
Inflammatory bowel disease
- I2:
-
Pseudomonas fluorescens-associated sequence
- IL:
-
Interleukin
- IPAA:
-
Ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis
- MAdCAM-1:
-
Mucosal addressin-cell adhesion molecule-1
- MCV:
-
Mean corpuscular volume
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MTX:
-
Methotrexate
- NF-kappaB:
-
Nuclear transcription factor kappa B
- NSAIDs:
-
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- OCP:
-
Oral contraceptive
- p-ANCA:
-
Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
- PG:
-
Pyoderma gangrenosum
- PSC:
-
Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- PUFAs:
-
Polyunsaturated fatty acids
- PUCAI:
-
Pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index
- VTE:
-
Venous thromboembolism
- UC:
-
Ulcerative colitis
References
Chong SK, Blackshaw AJ, Morson BC, Williams CB, Walker-Smith JA. Prospective study of colitis in infancy and early childhood. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5(3):352–8.
Mendeloff AI, Calkins BM. The epidemiology of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. In: Kirsner JB, Shorter RG, editors. Inflammatory bowel disease. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988. p. 3–34.
Langholz E, Munkholm P, Krasilnikoff PA, Binder V. Inflammatory bowel diseases with onset in childhood. Clinical features, morbidity, and mortality in a regional cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(2):139–47.
Gryboski JD. Ulcerative colitis in children 10 years old or younger. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1993;17(1):24–31.
Mamula P, Telega GW, Markowitz JE, Brown KA, Russo PA, Piccoli DA, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease in children 5 years of age and younger. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(8):2005–10.
Henderson P, Hansen R, Cameron FL, Gerasimidis K, Rogers P, Bisset WM, et al. Rising incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Scotland. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(6):999–1005.
Benchimol EI, Guttmann A, Griffiths AM, Rabeneck L, Mack DR, Brill H, et al. Increasing incidence of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Ontario, Canada: evidence from health administrative data. Gut. 2009;58(11):1490–7.
Adamiak T, Walkiewicz-Jedrzejczak D, Fish D, Brown C, Tung J, Khan K, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and natural history of pediatric IBD in Wisconsin: a population-based epidemiological study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(6):1218–23.
Jakobsen C, Paerregaard A, Munkholm P, Faerk J, Lange A, Andersen J, et al. Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: increasing incidence, decreasing surgery rate, and compromised nutritional status: a prospective population-based cohort study 2007–2009. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(12):2541–50.
Perminow G, Brackmann S, Lyckander LG, Franke A, Borthne A, Rydning A, et al. A characterization in childhood inflammatory bowel disease, a new population-based inception cohort from South-Eastern Norway, 2005–07, showing increased incidence in Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(4):446–56.
Malmborg P, Grahnquist L, Lindholm J, Montgomery S, Hildebrand H. Increasing incidence of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease in northern Stockholm County, 2002–2007. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(1):29–34.
Benchimol EI, Fortinsky KJ, Gozdyra P, Van den Heuvel M, Van Limbergen J, Griffiths AM. Epidemiology of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of international trends. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(1):423–39.
Sonnenberg A, McCarty DJ, Jacobsen SJ. Geographic variation of inflammatory bowel disease within the United States. Gastroenterology. 1991;100(1):143–9.
Shivananda S, Lennard-Jones J, Logan R, Fear N, Price A, Carpenter L, et al. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease across Europe: is there a difference between north and south? Results of the European Collaborative Study on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (EC-IBD). Gut. 1996;39(5):690–7.
Khalili H, Huang ES, Ananthakrishnan AN, Higuchi L, Richter JM, Fuchs CS, et al. Geographical variation and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease among US women. Gut. 2012;61(12): 1686–92.
Acheson ED. The distribution of ulcerative colitis and regional enteritis in United States veterans with particular reference to the Jewish religion. Gut. 1960;1:291–3.
Gilat T, Grossman A, Fireman Z, Rozen P. Inflammatory bowel disease in Jews. Front Gastrointest Res. 1986;11:141–5.
Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(21):2066–78.
Geremia A, Biancheri P, Allan P, Corazza GR, Di Sabatino A. Innate and adaptive immunity in inflammatory bowel disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(1):3–10.
Hendrickson BA, Gokhale R, Cho JH. Clinical aspects and pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(1):79–94.
Orholm M, Binder V, Sorensen TI, Rasmussen LP, Kyvik KO. Concordance of inflammatory bowel disease among Danish twins. Results of a nationwide study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(10):1075–81.
Halfvarson J, Bodin L, Tysk C, Lindberg E, Jarnerot G. Inflammatory bowel disease in a Swedish twin cohort: a long-term follow-up of concordance and clinical characteristics. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(7):1767–73.
Orholm M, Munkholm P, Langholz E, Nielsen OH, Sorensen IA, Binder V. Familial occurrence of inflammatory bowel disease. New Engl J Med. 1991;324(2):84–8.
Lees CW, Barrett JC, Parkes M, Satsangi J. New IBD genetics: common pathways with other diseases. Gut. 2011;60(12): 1739–53.
Silverberg MS, Cho JH, Rioux JD, McGovern DP, Wu J, Annese V, et al. Ulcerative colitis-risk loci on chromosomes 1p36 and 12q15 found by genome-wide association study. Nat Genet. 2009;41(2):216–20.
Fernando MM, Stevens CR, Walsh EC, De Jager PL, Goyette P, Plenge RM, et al. Defining the role of the MHC in autoimmunity: a review and pooled analysis. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(4):e1000024.
Papa E, Docktor M, Smillie C, Weber S, Preheim SP, Gevers D, et al. Non-invasive mapping of the gastrointestinal microbiota identifies children with inflammatory bowel disease. PloS one. 2012;7(6):e39242.
Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, Vazquez-Baeza Y, Van Treuren W, Ren B, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(3):382–92.
Wu GD, Chen J, Hoffmann C, Bittinger K, Chen YY, Keilbaugh SA, et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 2011;334(6052):105–8.
Vessey M, Jewell D, Smith A, Yeates D, McPherson K. Chronic inflammatory bowel disease, cigarette smoking, and use of oral contraceptives: findings in a large cohort study of women of childbearing age. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6528):1101–3.
Calkins BM. A meta-analysis of the role of smoking in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34(12):1841–54.
Koletzko S, Griffiths A, Corey M, Smith C, Sherman P. Infant feeding practices and ulcerative colitis in childhood. BMJ. 1991;302(6792):1580–1.
Jakobsen C, Paerregaard A, Munkholm P, Wewer V. Environmental factors and risk of developing paediatric inflammatory bowel disease—a population based study 2007–2009. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7(1):79–88.
Garcia Rodriguez LA, Ruigomez A, Panes J. Acute gastroenteritis is followed by an increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(6):1588–94.
Gradel KO, Nielsen HL, Schonheyder HC, Ejlertsen T, Kristensen B, Nielsen H. Increased short- and long-term risk of inflammatory bowel disease after salmonella or campylobacter gastroenteritis. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(2):495–501.
Kronman MP, Zaoutis TE, Haynes K, Feng R, Coffin SE. Antibiotic exposure and IBD development among children: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):e794–803.
Andersson RE, Olaison G, Tysk C, Ekbom A. Appendectomy and protection against ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):808–14.
Duggan AE, Usmani I, Neal KR, Logan RF. Appendicectomy, childhood hygiene, Helicobacter pylori status, and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a case control study. Gut. 1998;43(4): 494–8.
Feeney MA, Murphy F, Clegg AJ, Trebble TM, Sharer NM, Snook JA. A case-control study of childhood environmental risk factors for the development of inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14(5):529–34.
Klement E, Cohen RV, Boxman J, Joseph A, Reif S. Breastfeeding and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(5):1342–52.
Gilat T, Hacohen D, Lilos P, Langman MJ. Childhood factors in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. An international cooperative study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987;22(8):1009–24.
Hansen TS, Jess T, Vind I, Elkjaer M, Nielsen MF, Gamborg M, et al. Environmental factors in inflammatory bowel disease: a case-control study based on a Danish inception cohort. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2011;5(6):577–84.
Evans JM, McMahon AD, Murray FE, McDevitt DG, MacDonald TM. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with emergency admission to hospital for colitis due to inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1997;40(5):619–22.
Bonner GF. Exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease associated with use of celecoxib. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(4): 1306–8.
Ananthakrishnan AN, Higuchi LM, Huang ES, Khalili H, Richter JM, Fuchs CS, et al. Aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and risk for Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):350–9.
Takeuchi K, Smale S, Premchand P, Maiden L, Sherwood R, Thjodleifsson B, et al. Prevalence and mechanism of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced clinical relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(2):196–202.
Khalili H, Higuchi LM, Ananthakrishnan AN, Richter JM, Feskanich D, Fuchs CS, et al. Oral contraceptives, reproductive factors and risk of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2013;62(8):1153–9.
Lim WC, Hanauer SB, Li YC. Mechanisms of disease: vitamin D and inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;2(7):308–15.
David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505(7484):559–63.
Albenberg LG, Lewis JD, Wu GD. Food and the gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases: a critical connection. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28(4):314–20.
Hou JK, Abraham B, El-Serag H. Dietary intake and risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(4):563–73.
Chapman-Kiddell CA, Davies PS, Gillen L, Radford-Smith GL. Role of diet in the development of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(1):137–51.
Zhou L, Ivanov, II, Spolski R, Min R, Shenderov K, Egawa T, et al. IL-6 programs T(H)-17 cell differentiation by promoting sequential engagement of the IL-21 and IL-23 pathways. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(9):967–74.
Fujino S, Andoh A, Bamba S, Ogawa A, Hata K, Araki Y, et al. Increased expression of interleukin 17 in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2003;52(1):65–70.
Kobayashi T, Okamoto S, Hisamatsu T, Kamada N, Chinen H, Saito R, et al. IL23 differentially regulates the Th1/Th17 balance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2008;57(12):1682–9.
Consortium UIG, Barrett JC, Lee JC, Lees CW, Prescott NJ, Anderson CA, et al. Genome-wide association study of ulcerative colitis identifies three new susceptibility loci, including the HNF4A region. Nat Genet. 2009;41(12):1330–4.
Kaser A, Blumberg RS. Autophagy, microbial sensing, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and epithelial function in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(6):1738–47.
Hampe J, Schreiber S, Shaw SH, Lau KF, Bridger S, Macpherson AJ, et al. A genomewide analysis provides evidence for novel linkages in inflammatory bowel disease in a large European cohort. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64(3):808–16.
Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P, Van Steen K, Joossens S, Claessens G, Pierik M, et al. Genome wide scan in a Flemish inflammatory bowel disease population: support for the IBD4 locus, population heterogeneity, and epistasis. Gut. 2004;53(7):980–6.
Barmada MM, Brant SR, Nicolae DL, Achkar JP, Panhuysen CI, Bayless TM, et al. A genome scan in 260 inflammatory bowel disease-affected relative pairs. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10(1): 15–22.
Kaser A, Lee AH, Franke A, Glickman JN, Zeissig S, Tilg H, et al. XBP1 links ER stress to intestinal inflammation and confers genetic risk for human inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2008;134(5):743–56.
Levine A, Griffiths A, Markowitz J, Wilson DC, Turner D, Russell RK, et al. Pediatric modification of the Montreal classification for inflammatory bowel disease: the Paris classification. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(6):1314–21.
Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, Arnott ID, Bernstein CN, Brant SR, et al. Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005;19 Suppl A:5a–36a.
Rao SS, Holdsworth CD, Read NW. Symptoms and stool patterns in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1988;29(3):342–5.
Bentsen BS, Moum B, Ekbom A. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in children in southeastern Norway: a prospective population-based study 1990–94. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(5): 540–5.
Heikenen JB, Werlin SL, Brown CW, Balint JP. Presenting symptoms and diagnostic lag in children with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1999;5(3):158–60.
Higuchi L, Bousvaros, A. Ulcerative colitis. In Guandalini S, editor. Textbook of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. London: Taylor & Francis; 2004. p. 385–417.
Olafsdottir EJ, Fluge G, Haug K. Chronic inflammatory bowel disease in children in western Norway. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989;8(4):454–8.
Mir-Madjlessi SH, Michener WM, Farmer RG. Course and prognosis of idiopathic ulcerative proctosigmoiditis in young patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5(4):571–5.
Motil KJ, Grand RJ. Ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease in children. Pediatr Rev. 1987;9(4):109–20.
Grand RJ, Homer DR. Approaches to inflammatory bowel disease in childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1975;22(4):835–50.
Werlin SL, Grand RJ. Severe colitis in children and adolescents: diagnosis. Course, and treatment. Gastroenterology. 1977; 73(4 Pt 1):828–32.
Moran CJ, Walters TD, Guo CH, Kugathasan S, Klein C, Turner D, et al. IL-10R polymorphisms are associated with very-early-onset ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(1):115–23.
Sachar DB, Smith H, Chan S, Cohen LB, Lichtiger S, Messer J. Erythrocytic sedimentation rate as a measure of clinical activity in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986;8(6): 647–50.
Macfarlane PI, Miller V, Wells F, Richards B. Laboratory assessment of disease activity in childhood Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5(1):93–6.
Holmquist L, Ahren C, Fallstrom SP. Relationship between results of laboratory tests and inflammatory activity assessed by colonoscopy in children and adolescents with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989;9(2):187–93.
Mack DR, Langton C, Markowitz J, LeLeiko N, Griffiths A, Bousvaros A, et al. Laboratory values for children with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):1113–9.
Ashorn S, Honkanen T, Kolho KL, Ashorn M, Valineva T, Wei B, et al. Fecal calprotectin levels and serological responses to microbial antigens among children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(2):199–205.
Walker TR, L and ML, Kartashov A, Saslowsky TM, Lyerly DM, Boone JH, et al. Fecal lactoferrin is a sensitive and specific marker of disease activity in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(4):414–22.
Kopylov U, Rosenfeld G, Bressler B, Seidman E. Clinical utility of fecal biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(4):742–56.
van Rheenen PF, Van de Vijver E, Fidler V. Faecal calprotectin for screening of patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c3369.
Ruemmele FM, Targan SR, Levy G, Dubinsky M, Braun J, Seidman EG. Diagnostic accuracy of serological assays in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1998;115(4): 822–9.
Dubinsky MC, Ofman JJ, Urman M, Targan SR, Seidman EG. Clinical utility of serodiagnostic testing in suspected pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(3): 758–65.
Duerr RH, Targan SR, Landers CJ, Sutherland LR, Shanahan F. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in ulcerative colitis. Comparison with other colitides/diarrheal illnesses. Gastroenterology. 1991;100(6):1590–6.
Winter HS, Landers CJ, Winkelstein A, Vidrich A, Targan SR. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in children with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr. 1994; 125(5 Pt 1):707–11.
Rutgeerts P, Vermeire S. Serological diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet. 2000;356(9248):2117–8.
Benor S, Russell GH, Silver M, Israel EJ, Yuan Q, Winter HS. Shortcomings of the inflammatory bowel disease Serology 7 panel. Pediatrics. 2010;125(6):1230–6.
Levine A, Koletzko S, Turner D, Escher JC, Cucchiara S, de Ridder L, et al. ESPGHAN revised porto criteria for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58(6):795–806.
Markowitz J, Kahn E, Grancher K, Hyams J, Treem W, Daum F. Atypical rectosigmoid histology in children with newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88(12):2034–7.
Bousvaros A, Glickman JN, Farraye FA, Friedman S, Leichtner AM, Wang H, et al. Pediatric patients with untreated ulcerative colitis may present initially with unusual morphologic findings. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(4, Suppl. 1):A–11.
Glickman JN, Bousvaros A, Farraye FA, Zholudev A, Friedman S, Wang HH, et al. Pediatric patients with untreated ulcerative colitis may present initially with unusual morphologic findings. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(2):190–7.
Levine A, de Bie CI, Turner D, Cucchiara S, Sladek M, Murphy MS, et al. Atypical disease phenotypes in pediatric ulcerative colitis: 5-year analyses of the EUROKIDS Registry. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(2):370–7.
Bousvaros A, Antonioli DA, Colletti RB, Dubinsky MC, Glickman JN, Gold BD, et al. Differentiating ulcerative colitis from Crohn disease in children and young adults: report of a working group of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(5):653–74.
Seidman EG. Role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001;11(4):641–57, vi.
Chutkan RK, Scherl E, Waye JD. Colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002;12(3): 463–83, viii.
Domizio P. Pathology of chronic inflammatory bowel disease in children. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;8(1):35–63.
Washington K, Greenson JK, Montgomery E, Shyr Y, Crissinger KD, Polk DB, et al. Histopathology of ulcerative colitis in initial rectal biopsy in children. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(11):1441–9.
Chong SK, Blackshaw AJ, Boyle S, Williams CB, Walker-Smith JA. Histological diagnosis of chronic inflammatory bowel disease in childhood. Gut. 1985;26(1):55–9.
Scotiniotis I, Rubesin SE, Ginsberg GG. Imaging modalities in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 1999;28(2):391–421, ix.
Aideyan UO, Smith WL. Inflammatory bowel disease in children. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996;34(4):885–902.
Langmead L, Rampton DS. Plain abdominal radiographic features are not reliable markers of disease extent in active ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(2):354–9.
Ruuska T, Vaajalahti P, Arajarvi P, Maki M. Prospective evaluation of upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions in children with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1994;19(2):181–6.
De Matos V, Russo PA, Cohen AB, Mamula P, Baldassano RN, Piccoli DA. Frequency and clinical correlations of granulomas in children with Crohn disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;46(4):392–8.
Odze R. Diagnostic problems and advances in inflammatory bowel disease. Mod Pathol. 2003;16(4):347–58.
Kaufman SS, Vanderhoof JA, Young R, Perry D, Raynor SC, Mack DR. Gastroenteric inflammation in children with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(7):1209–12.
Sharif F, McDermott M, Dillon M, Drumm B, Rowland M, Imrie C, et al. Focally enhanced gastritis in children with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(6): 1415–20.
Tobin JM, Sinha B, Ramani P, Saleh AR, Murphy MS. Upper gastrointestinal mucosal disease in pediatric Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis: a blinded, controlled study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;32(4):443–8.
Hildebrand H, Fredrikzon B, Holmquist L, Kristiansson B, Lindquist B. Chronic inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents in Sweden. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1991;13(3):293–7.
Joossens S, Reinisch W, Vermeire S, Sendid B, Poulain D, Peeters M, et al. The value of serologic markers in indeterminate colitis: a prospective follow-up study. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(5):1242–7.
Hyams JS. Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1994;19(1): 7–21.
Greenstein AJ, Janowitz HD, Sachar DB. The extra-intestinal complications of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: a study of 700 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1976;55(5):401–12.
Dotson JL, Hyams JS, Markowitz J, LeLeiko NS, Mack DR, Evans JS, et al. Extraintestinal manifestations of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and their relation to disease type and severity. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(2):140–5.
Jose FA, Garnett EA, Vittinghoff E, Ferry GD, Winter HS, Baldassano RN, et al. Development of extraintestinal manifestations in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(1):63–8.
Lindsley CB, Schaller JG. Arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease in children. J Pediatr. 1974;84(1):16–20.
Mir-Madjlessi SH, Taylor JS, Farmer RG. Clinical course and evolution of erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum in chronic ulcerative colitis: a study of 42 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1985;80(8):615–20.
Wilschanski M, Chait P, Wade JA, Davis L, Corey M, St Louis P, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis in 32 children: clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features, with survival analysis. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 1995;22(5):1415–22.
Orchard TR, Wordsworth BP, Jewell DP. Peripheral arthropathies in inflammatory bowel disease: their articular distribution and natural history. Gut. 1998;42(3):387–91.
Das KM. Relationship of extraintestinal involvements in inflammatory bowel disease: new insights into autoimmune pathogenesis. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44(1):1–13.
Levitt MD, Ritchie JK, Lennard-Jones JE, Phillips RK. Pyoderma gangrenosum in inflammatory bowel disease. Br J Surg. 1991;78(6):676–8.
Callen JP. Pyoderma gangrenosum. Lancet. 1998;351(9102): 581–5.
Finkel SI, Janowitz HD. Trauma and the pyoderma gangrenosum of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1981;22(5):410–2.
Requena L, Requena C. Erythema nodosum. Dermatol Online J. 2002;8(1):4.
Su CG, Judge TA, Lichtenstein GR. Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2002;31(1):307–27.
Rychwalski PJ, Cruz OA, Alanis-Lambreton G, Foy TM, Kane RE. Asymptomatic uveitis in young people with inflammatory bowel disease. J AAPOS. 1997;1(2):111–4.
Hofley P, Roarty J, McGinnity G, Griffiths AM, Marcon M, Kraft S, et al. Asymptomatic uveitis in children with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1993;17(4):397–400.
Orchard TR, Chua CN, Ahmad T, Cheng H, Welsh KI, Jewell DP. Uveitis and erythema nodosum in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical features and the role of HLA genes. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(3):714–8.
Tripathi RC, Kipp MA, Tripathi BJ, Kirschner BS, Borisuth NS, Shevell SK, et al. Ocular toxicity of prednisone in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Lens Eye Toxic Res. 1992;9(3–4):469–82.
Tripathi RC, Kirschner BS, Kipp M, Tripathi BJ, Slotwiner D, Borisuth NS, et al. Corticosteroid treatment for inflammatory bowel disease in pediatric patients increases intraocular pressure. Gastroenterology. 1992;102(6):1957–61.
Hyams J, Markowitz J, Treem W. Characterization of hepatic abnormalities in children with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1995;1:27.
Deneau M, Jensen MK, Holmen J, Williams MS, Book LS, Guthery SL. Primary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and overlap in Utah children: epidemiology and natural history. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2013;58(4):1392–400.
Roberts EA. Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;14(6):588–93.
Raj V, Lichtenstein DR. Hepatobiliary manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 1999;28(2): 491–513.
Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Houston DS, Wajda A. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85(3):430–4.
Grainge MJ, West J, Card TR. Venous thromboembolism during active disease and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a cohort study. Lancet. 2010;375(9715):657–63.
Kappelman MD, Horvath-Puho E, Sandler RS, Rubin DT, Ullman TA, Pedersen L, et al. Thromboembolic risk among Danish children and adults with inflammatory bowel diseases: a population-based nationwide study. Gut. 2011;60(7):937–43.
Zitomersky NL, Levine AE, Atkinson BJ, Harney KM, Verhave M, Bousvaros A, et al. Risk factors, morbidity, and treatment of thrombosis in children and young adults with active inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(3):343–7.
Nylund CM, Goudie A, Garza JM, Crouch G, Denson LA. Venous thrombotic events in hospitalized children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56(5):485–91.
Zitomersky NL, Verhave M, Trenor CC, 3rd. Thrombosis and inflammatory bowel disease: a call for improved awareness and prevention. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(1):458–70.
Higuchi LM, Joffe S, Neufeld EJ, Weisdorf S, Rosh J, Murch S, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease associated with immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;33(5):582–7.
Giannadaki E, Potamianos S, Roussomoustakaki M, Kyriakou D, Fragkiadakis N, Manousos ON. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia and positive Coombs test associated with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenter. 1997;92(10):1872–4.
Gokhale R, Favus MJ, Karrison T, Sutton MM, Rich B, Kirschner BS. Bone mineral density assessment in children with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(5):902–11.
Pappa H, Thayu M, Sylvester F, Leonard M, Zemel B, Gordon C. Skeletal health of children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53(1):11–25.
Clark JH, Fitzgerald JF, Bergstein JM. Nephrolithiasis in childhood inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1985;4(5):829–34.
Keljo DJ, Sugerman KS. Pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997;25(1): 108–12.
Huang C, Lichtenstein DR. Pancreatic and biliary tract disorders in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002;12(3):535–59.
Jewell DP, Caprilli R, Mortensen N, et al. Indications and timing of surgery for severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Int. 1991;4:161–4.
Present DH. Toxic megacolon. Med Clin North Am. 1993;77(5):1129–48.
Sheth SG, LaMont JT. Toxic megacolon. Lancet. 1998;351(9101):509–13.
Greenstein AJ, Barth JA, Sachar DB, Aufses AH, Jr. Free colonic perforation without dilatation in ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg. 1986;152(3):272–5.
Jalan KN, Sircus W, Card WI, Falconer CW, Bruce CB, Crean GP, et al. An experience of ulcerative colitis. I. Toxic dilation in 55 cases. Gastroenterology. 1969;57(1):68–82.
Fazio VW. Toxic megacolon in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s colitis. Clin Gastroenterol. 1980;9(2):389–407.
Grieco MB, Bordan DL, Geiss AC, Beil AR, Jr. Toxic megacolon complicating Crohn’s colitis. Ann Surg. 1980;191(1):75–80.
Brown JW. Toxic megacolon associated with loperamide therapy. JAMA. 1979;241(5):501–2.
Norland CC, Kirsner JB. Toxic dilatation of colon (toxic megacolon): etiology, treatment and prognosis in 42 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1969;48(3):229–50.
Koudahl G, Kristensen M. Toxic megacolon in ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(4):417–21.
Halpert RD. Toxic dilatation of the colon. Radiol Clin North Am. 1987;25(1):147–55.
Kramer P, Wittenberg J. Colonic gas distribution in toxic megacolon. Gastroenterology. 1981;80(3):433–7.
Caroline DF, Evers K. Colitis: radiographic features and differentiation of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 1987;25(1):47–66.
Gumaste V, Sachar DB, Greenstein AJ. Benign and malignant colorectal strictures in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1992;33(7):938–41.
Horton KM, Jones B, Fishman EK. Imaging of the inflammatory bowel diseases. In: Kirsner JB, editor. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000. p. 479–500.
Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis. Final report on a therapeutic trial. BMJ. 1955;2:1041.
Turner D, Otley AR, Mack D, Hyams J, de Bruijne J, Uusoue K, et al. Development, validation, and evaluation of a pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index: a prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(2):423–32.
Turner D, Hyams J, Markowitz J, Lerer T, Mack DR, Evans J, et al. Appraisal of the pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index (PUCAI). Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(8):1218–23.
Turner D, Mack D, Leleiko N, Walters TD, Uusoue K, Leach ST, et al. Severe pediatric ulcerative colitis: a prospective multicenter study of outcomes and predictors of response. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(7):2282–91.
Feagan BG, Macdonald JK. Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:Cd000544.
Sonu I, Lin MV, Blonski W, Lichtenstein GR. Clinical pharmacology of 5-ASA compounds in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2010;39(3):559–99.
Zeisler B, Lerer T, Markowitz J, Mack D, Griffiths A, Bousvaros A, et al. Outcome following aminosalicylate therapy in children newly diagnosed as having ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56(1):12–8.
Peppercorn MA. Sulfasalazine. Pharmacology, clinical use, toxicity, and related new drug development. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101(3):377–86.
Leichtner AM. Aminosalicylates for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995;21(3): 245–52.
Wahl C, Liptay S, Adler G, Schmid RM. Sulfasalazine: a potent and specific inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B. J Clin Investig. 1998;101(5):1163–74.
Bantel H, Berg C, Vieth M, Stolte M, Kruis W, Schulze-Osthoff K. Mesalazine inhibits activation of transcription factor NF-kappaB in inflamed mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(12):3452–7.
Dick AP, Grayson MJ, Carpenter RG, Petrie A. Controlled trial of sulfasalazine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1964;5:437–42.
Sninsky CA, Cort DH, Shanahan F, Powers BJ, Sessions JT, Pruitt RE, et al. Oral mesalamine (Asacol) for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A multicenter study. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(5):350–5.
Sutherland LR, May GR, Shaffer EA. Sulfasalazine revisited: a meta-analysis of 5-aminosalicylic acid in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(7):540–9.
Gisbert JP, Gomollon F, Mate J, Pajares JM. Role of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47(3):471–88.
Sutherland LR, Roth DE, Beck PL. Alternatives to sulfasalazine: a meta-analysis of 5-ASA in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1997;3(2):65–78.
Barden L, Lipson A, Pert P. Mesalazine in childhood inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Therap. 1989;3:597.
Levine DS, Riff DS, Pruitt R, Wruble L, Koval G, Sales D, et al. A randomized, double blind, dose-response comparison of balsalazide (6.75 g), balsalazide (2.25 g), and mesalamine (2.4 g) in the treatment of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(6):1398–407.
Green JR, Lobo AJ, Holdsworth CD, Leicester RJ, Gibson JA, Kerr GD, et al. Balsalazide is more effective and better tolerated than mesalamine in the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis. The Abacus Investigator Group. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(1): 15–22.
Hanauer SB. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(13):841–8.
Boyer DL, Li BU, Fyda JN, Friedman RA. Sulfasalazine-induced hepatotoxicity in children with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989;8(4):528–32.
Garau P, Orenstein SR, Neigut DA, Kocoshis SA. Pancreatitis associated with olsalazine and sulfasalazine in children with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1994;18(4):481–5.
Paerregaard A, Krasilnikoff PA. Pancreatitis in a child after rectal administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1997;3:20.
Sturgeon JB, Bhatia P, Hermens D, Miner PB, Jr. Exacerbation of chronic ulcerative colitis with mesalamine. Gastroenterology. 1995;108(6):1889–93.
Hyams J, Markowitz J, Lerer T, Griffiths A, Mack D, Bousvaros A, et al. The natural history of corticosteroid therapy for ulcerative colitis in children. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(9): 1118–23.
Truhan AP, Ahmed AR. Corticosteroids: a review with emphasis on complications of prolonged systemic therapy. Ann Allergy. 1989;62(5):375–91.
Kirschner BS. The medical management of inflammatory bowel disease in children. In: Kirsner JB, editor. Inflammatory bowel disease. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000. p. 578–97.
Bousvaros A. Immunosuppression. In: Walker WA, Durie PR, Hamilton JR, Walker-Smith JA, Watkins JB, editors. Pediatric gastrointestinal disease. Ontario: B.C. Decker; 2000. p. 1769–94.
McIntyre PB, Powell-Tuck J, Wood SR, Lennard-Jones JE, Lerebours E, Hecketsweiler P, et al. Controlled trial of bowel rest in the treatment of severe acute colitis. Gut. 1986;27(5):481–5.
Dickinson RJ, Ashton MG, Axon AT, Smith RC, Yeung CK, Hill GL. Controlled trial of intravenous hyperalimentation and total bowel rest as an adjunct to the routine therapy of acute colitis. Gastroenterology. 1980;79(6):1199–204.
Peppercorn MA. Are antibiotics useful in the management of nontoxic severe ulcerative colitis? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993;17(1):14–7.
Chapman RW, Selby WS, Jewell DP. Controlled trial of intravenous metronidazole as an adjunct to corticosteroids in severe ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1986;27(10):1210–2.
Mantzaris GJ, Hatzis A, Kontogiannis P, Triadaphyllou G. Intravenous tobramycin and metronidazole as an adjunct to corticosteroids in acute, severe ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89(1):43–6.
Mantzaris GJ, Petraki K, Archavlis E, Amberiadis P, Kourtessas D, Christidou A, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of intravenous ciprofloxacin as an adjunct to corticosteroids in acute, severe ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;36(9): 971–4.
Turner D, Travis SP, Griffiths AM, Ruemmele FM, Levine A, Benchimol EI, et al. Consensus for managing acute severe ulcerative colitis in children: a systematic review and joint statement from ECCO, ESPGHAN, and the Porto IBD Working Group of ESPGHAN. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(4):574–88.
Jarnerot G, Hertervig E, Friis-Liby I, Blomquist L, Karlen P, Granno C, et al. Infliximab as rescue therapy in severe to moderately severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(7):1805–11.
Vande Casteele N, Feagan BG, Gils A, Vermeire S, Khanna R, Sandborn WJ, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: current state and future perspectives. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2014;16(4):378.
Watanabe M, Hibi T, Mostafa NM, Chao J, Arora V, Camez A, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. J Crohn's Colitis. 2014;8(11):1407-16
Watson S, Pensabene L, Mitchell P, Bousvaros A. Outcomes and adverse events in children and young adults undergoing tacrolimus therapy for steroid-refractory colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(1):22–9.
Hait EJ, Bousvaros A, Schuman M, Shamberger RC, Lillehei CW. Pouch outcomes among children with ulcerative colitis treated with calcineurin inhibitors before ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(1):31–4; discussion 4–5.
Treem WR, Cohen J, Davis PM, Justinich CJ, Hyams JS. Cyclosporine for the treatment of fulminant ulcerative colitis in children. Immediate response, long-term results, and impact on surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(5):474–9.
Bousvaros A, Kirschner BS, Werlin SL, Parker-Hartigan L, Daum F, Freeman KB, et al. Oral tacrolimus treatment of severe colitis in children. J Pediatr. 2000;137(6):794–9.
Marshall JK, Irvine EJ. Rectal aminosalicylate therapy for distal ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995;9(3):293–300.
Marshall JK, Irvine EJ. Rectal corticosteroids versus alternative treatments in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 1997;40(6):775–81.
Mulder CJ, Tytgat GN. Review article: topical corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993;7:125–30.
Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Venturi A, Ferretti M, Brignola C, Miglioli M, et al. Comparison of oral with rectal mesalazine in the treatment of ulcerative proctitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(1):93–7.
Cohen RD, Woseth DM, Thisted RA, Hanauer SB. A meta-analysis and overview of the literature on treatment options for left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(5):1263–76.
Allgayer H. Sulfasalazine and 5-ASA compounds. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 1992;21(3):643–58.
Sutherland LR. Topical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Med Clin North Am. 1990;74(1):119–31.
Safdi M, DeMicco M, Sninsky C, Banks P, Wruble L, Deren J, et al. A double-blind comparison of oral versus rectal mesalamine versus combination therapy in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(10):1867–71.
Danielsson A, Lofberg R, Persson T, Salde L, Schioler R, Suhr O, et al. A steroid enema, budesonide, lacking systemic effects for the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27(1):9–12.
Hanauer SB, Robinson M, Pruitt R, Lazenby AJ, Persson T, Nilsson LG, et al. Budesonide enema for the treatment of active, distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis: a dose-ranging study. U.S. Budesonide enema study group. Gastroenterology. 1998;115(3):525–32.
D’Agata ID, Vanounou T, Seidman E. Mesalamine in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a 10-year experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1996;2:229–35.
Kruis W, Schreiber S, Theuer D, Brandes JW, Schutz E, Howaldt S, et al. Low dose balsalazide (1.5 g twice daily) and mesalazine (0.5 g three times daily) maintained remission of ulcerative colitis but high dose balsalazide (3.0 g twice daily) was superior in preventing relapses. Gut. 2001;49(6):783–9.
d’Albasio G, Paoluzi P, Campieri M, Porro GB, Pera A, Prantera C, et al. Maintenance treatment of ulcerative proctitis with mesalazine suppositories: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The Italian IBD Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93(5): 799–803.
d’Albasio G, Pacini F, Camarri E, Messori A, Trallori G, Bonanomi AG, et al. Combined therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid tablets and enemas for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis: a randomized double-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(7):1143–7.
Ryan BM, Russel MG, Langholz E, Stockbrugger RW. Aminosalicylates and colorectal cancer in IBD: a not-so bitter pill to swallow. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(8):1682–7.
Eaden J, Abrams K, Ekbom A, Jackson E, Mayberry J. Colorectal cancer prevention in ulcerative colitis: a case-control study. Aliment Pharmacol Therapeut. 2000;14(2):145–53.
Pinczowski D, Ekbom A, Baron J, Yuen J, Adami HO. Risk factors for colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis: a case-control study. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(1):117–20.
Verhave M, Winter HS, Grand RJ. Azathioprine in the treatment of children with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr. 1990;117(5):809–14.
Kader HA, Mascarenhas MR, Piccoli DA, Stouffer NO, Baldassano RN. Experiences with 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine therapy in pediatric patients with severe ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999;28(1):54–8.
Pearson DC, May GR, Fick GH, Sutherland LR. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in Crohn disease. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(2):132–42.
Tiede I, Fritz G, Strand S, Poppe D, Dvorsky R, Strand D, et al. CD28-dependent Rac1 activation is the molecular target of azathioprine in primary human CD4 + T lymphocytes. J Clin Investig. 2003;111(8):1133–45.
Kirschner BS. Safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1998;115(4):813–21.
Hyams JS, Lerer T, Mack D, Bousvaros A, Griffiths A, Rosh J, et al. Outcome following thiopurine use in children with ulcerative colitis: a prospective multicenter registry study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(5):981–7.
Louis E, Belaiche J. Optimizing treatment with thioguanine derivatives in inflammatory bowel disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;17(1):37–46.
Derijks LJ, Gilissen LP, Hooymans PM, Hommes DW. Review article: thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(5):715–29.
Lennard L, Van Loon JA, Weinshilboum RM. Pharmacogenetics of acute azathioprine toxicity: relationship to thiopurine methyltransferase genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989;46(2):149–54.
Osterman MT, Kundu R, Lichtenstein GR, Lewis JD. Association of 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels and inflammatory bowel disease activity: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(4):1047–53.
Cuffari C, Theoret Y, Latour S, Seidman G. 6-Mercaptopurine metabolism in Crohn’s disease: correlation with efficacy and toxicity. Gut. 1996;39(3):401–6.
Dubinsky MC, Lamothe S, Yang HY, Targan SR, Sinnett D, Theoret Y, et al. Pharmacogenomics and metabolite measurement for 6-mercaptopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(4):705–13.
Cuffari C, Hunt S, Bayless T. Utilisation of erythrocyte 6-thioguanine metabolite levels to optimise azathioprine therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2001;48(5):642–6.
Rahhal RM, Bishop WP. Initial clinical experience with allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(12):1678–82.
Shih DQ, Nguyen M, Zheng L, Ibanez P, Mei L, Kwan LY, et al. Split-dose administration of thiopurine drugs: a novel and effective strategy for managing preferential 6-MMP metabolism. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36(5):449–58.
George J, Present DH, Pou R, Bodian C, Rubin PH. The long-term outcome of ulcerative colitis treated with 6-mercaptopurine. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91(9):1711–4.
Kandiel A, Fraser AG, Korelitz BI, Brensinger C, Lewis JD. Increased risk of lymphoma among inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. Gut. 2005;54(8):1121–5.
Dayharsh GA, Loftus EV, Jr., Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Zinsmeister AR, Witzig TE, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-positive lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(1):72–7.
Chande N, MacDonald JK, McDonald JW. Methotrexate for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(4):CD006618.
Jolivet J, Cowan KH, Curt GA, Clendeninn NJ, Chabner BA. The pharmacology and clinical use of methotrexate. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(18):1094–104.
Ravikumara M, Hinsberger A, Spray CH. Role of methotrexate in the management of Crohn disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(4):427–30.
Morabito L, Montesinos MC, Schreibman DM, Balter L, Thompson LF, Resta R, et al. Methotrexate and sulfasalazine promote adenosine release by a mechanism that requires ecto-5′-nucleotidase-mediated conversion of adenine nucleotides. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(2):295–300.
Genestier L, Paillot R, Fournel S, Ferraro C, Miossec P, Revillard JP. Immunosuppressive properties of methotrexate: apoptosis and clonal deletion of activated peripheral T cells. J Clin Investig. 1998;102(2):322–8.
Cronstein BN. The mechanism of action of methotrexate. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 1997;23(4):739–55.
Oren R, Arber N, Odes S, Moshkowitz M, Keter D, Pomeranz I, et al. Methotrexate in chronic active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized, Israeli multicenter trial. Gastroenterology. 1996;110(5):1416–21.
Aloi M, Di Nardo G, Conte F, Mazzeo L, Cavallari N, Nuti F, et al. Methotrexate in paediatric ulcerative colitis: a retrospective survey at a single tertiary referral centre. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(8):1017–22.
Jakobsen C, Bartek J, Jr., Wewer V, Vind I, Munkholm P, Groen R, et al. Differences in phenotype and disease course in adult and paediatric inflammatory bowel disease—a population-based study. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(10):1217–24.
Breese EJ, Michie CA, Nicholls SW, Murch SH, Williams CB, Domizio P, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-producing cells in the intestinal mucosa of children with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1994;106(6):1455–66.
Viallard JF, Pellegrin JL, Ranchin V, Schaeverbeke T, Dehais J, Longy-Boursier M, et al. Th1 (IL-2, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)) and Th2 (IL-10, IL-4) cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Clin Exp Immunol. 1999;115(1): 189–95.
Hyams J, Damaraju L, Blank M, Johanns J, Guzzo C, Winter HS, et al. Induction and maintenance therapy with infliximab for children with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(4):391–9. e1.
Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Reinisch W, Olson A, Johanns J, et al. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2462–76.
Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Middleton S, Marquez JR, Scott BB, Flint L, et al. Combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine is superior to monotherapy with either agent in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(2):392–400. e3.
Sandborn WJ, van Assche G, Reinisch W, Colombel JF, D’Haens G, Wolf DC, et al. Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(2):257–65.e1–3.
Erle DJ, Briskin MJ, Butcher EC, Garcia-Pardo A, Lazarovits AI, Tidswell M. Expression and function of the MAdCAM-1 receptor, integrin alpha 4 beta 7, on human leukocytes. J Immunol. 1994;153(2):517–28.
Arihiro S, Ohtani H, Suzuki M, Murata M, Ejima C, Oki M, et al. Differential expression of mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Pathol Int. 2002;52(5–6):367–74.
Briskin M, Winsor-Hines D, Shyjan A, Cochran N, Bloom S, Wilson J, et al. Human mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 is preferentially expressed in intestinal tract and associated lymphoid tissue. Am J Pathol. 1997;151(1):97–110.
Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Sands BE, Hanauer S, Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, et al. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8): 699–710.
Burke DA, Axon AT, Clayden SA, Dixon MF, Johnston D, Lacey RW. The efficacy of tobramycin in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 1990;4(2):123–9.
Lobo AJ, Burke DA, Sobala GM, Axon AT. Oral tobramycin in ulcerative colitis: effect on maintenance of remission. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 1993;7(2):155–8.
Gilat T, Suissa A, Leichtman G, Delpre G, Pavlotzky M, Grossman A, et al. A comparative study of metronidazole and sulfasalazine in active, not severe, ulcerative colitis. An Israeli multicenter trial. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1987;9(4):415–7.
Dickinson RJ, O’Connor HJ, Pinder I, Hamilton I, Johnston D, Axon AT. Double blind controlled trial of oral vancomycin as adjunctive treatment in acute exacerbations of idiopathic colitis. Gut. 1985;26(12):1380–4.
Mantzaris GJ, Archavlis E, Christoforidis P, Kourtessas D, Amberiadis P, Florakis N, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of oral ciprofloxacin in acute ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(3):454–6.
Turunen UM, Farkkila MA, Hakala K, Seppala K, Sivonen A, Ogren M, et al. Long-term treatment of ulcerative colitis with ciprofloxacin: a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Gastroenterology. 1998;115(5):1072–8.
Changelian PS, Moshinsky D, Kuhn CF, Flanagan ME, Munchhof MJ, Harris TM, et al. The specificity of JAK3 kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2008;111(4):2155–7.
Flanagan ME, Blumenkopf TA, Brissette WH, Brown MF, Casavant JM, Shang-Poa C, et al. Discovery of CP-690,550: a potent and selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and organ transplant rejection. J Med Chem. 2010;53(24):8468–84.
Ghoreschi K, Jesson MI, Li X, Lee JL, Ghosh S, Alsup JW, et al. Modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses by tofacitinib (CP-690,550). J Immunol. 2011;186(7):4234–43.
Sandborn WJ, Ghosh S, Panes J, Vranic I, Su C, Rousell S, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in active ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(7):616–24.
Allison AC, Eugui EM. Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action. Immunopharmacology. 2000;47(2–3):85–118.
Palaniappan S, Ford AC, Greer D, Everett SM, Chalmers DM, Axon AT, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for refractory inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13(12):1488–92.
Smith MR, Cooper SC. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy in the management of inflammatory bowel disease --A retrospective case series and review. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2014: 8(8):890-7
Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Helwig U, Venturi A, Lammers KM, Brigidi P, et al. Prophylaxis of pouchitis onset with probiotic therapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(5):1202–9.
Miele E, Pascarella F, Giannetti E, Quaglietta L, Baldassano RN, Staiano A. Effect of a probiotic preparation (VSL#3) on induction and maintenance of remission in children with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(2):437–43.
Shen J, Zuo ZX, Mao AP. Effect of probiotics on inducing remission and maintaining therapy in ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and pouchitis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(1):21–35.
Stenson WF, Cort D, Rodgers J, Burakoff R, DeSchryver-Kecskemeti K, Gramlich TL, et al. Dietary supplementation with fish oil in ulcerative colitis. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116(8):609–14.
Aslan A, Triadafilopoulos G. Fish oil fatty acid supplementation in active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87(4):432–7.
Hawthorne AB, Daneshmend TK, Hawkey CJ, Belluzzi A, Everitt SJ, Holmes GK, et al. Treatment of ulcerative colitis with fish oil supplementation: a prospective 12 month randomised controlled trial. Gut. 1992;33(7):922–8.
Greenfield SM, Green AT, Teare JP, Jenkins AP, Punchard NA, Ainley CC, et al. A randomized controlled study of evening primrose oil and fish oil in ulcerative colitis. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 1993;7(2):159–66.
Scheppach W. Treatment of distal ulcerative colitis with short-chain fatty acid enemas. A placebo-controlled trial. German-Austrian SCFA Study Group. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41(11):2254–9.
Breuer RI, Soergel KH, Lashner BA, Christ ML, Hanauer SB, Vanagunas A, et al. Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial. Gut. 1997;40(4):485–91.
Vernia P, Marcheggiano A, Caprilli R, Frieri G, Corrao G, Valpiani D, et al. Short-chain fatty acid topical treatment in distal ulcerative colitis. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 1995;9(3):309–13.
Motil KJ, Grand RJ. Nutritional management of inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1985;32(2):447–69.
Burke A, Lichtenstein GR, Rombeau JL. Nutrition and ulcerative colitis. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1997;11(1):153–74.
Dziechciarz P, Horvath A, Shamir R, Szajewska H. Meta-analysis: enteral nutrition in active Crohn’s disease in children. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26(6):795–806.
Johnson T, Macdonald S, Hill SM, Thomas A, Murphy MS. Treatment of active Crohn’s disease in children using partial enteral nutrition with liquid formula: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2006;55(3):356–61.
Kleinman RE, Balistreri WF, Heyman MB, Kirschner BS, Lake AM, Motil KJ, et al. Nutritional support for pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989;8(1):8–12.
Escher JC, Taminiau JA, Nieuwenhuis EE, Buller HA, Grand RJ. Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in childhood: best available evidence. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2003;9(1):34–58.
Durno C, Sherman P, Harris K, Smith C, Dupuis A, Shandling B, et al. Outcome after ileoanal anastomosis in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;27(5):501–7.
Perrault J, Berry R, Greseth J, Zinsmeister A, Telander R. Pouchitis in young patients after the ileal-pouch anal anastomosis. Infamm Bowel Dis. 1997;3(3):181–5.
Dozois RR, Kelly KA. The surgical management of ulcerative colitis. In: Kirsner JB, editor. Inflammatory bowel disease. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2000. p. 626–57.
Nicholls S, Vieira MC, Majrowski WH, Shand WS, Savage MO, Walker-Smith JA. Linear growth after colectomy for ulcerative colitis in childhood. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995;21(1): 82–6.
Falcone RA, Jr., Lewis LG, Warner BW. Predicting the need for colectomy in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4(2):201–6.
Kettlewell MGW. Recent advances in surgical therapy. In: Tytgat GNJ, Bartelsman JFWM, van Deventer SJH, editors. Inflammatory bowel diseases. Boston: Kluwer; 1995. p. 508–16.
Farouk R, Pemberton JH. Surgical options in ulcerative colitis. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(1):85–94.
Mowschenson PM, Critchlow JF. Outcome of early surgical complications following ileoanal pouch operation without diverting ileostomy. Am J Surg. 1995;169(1):143–5; discussion 5–6.
Fonkalsrud EW, Thakur A, Beanes S. Ileoanal pouch procedures in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(11):1689–92.
Telander RL, Spencer M, Perrault J, Telander D, Zinsmeister AR. Long-term follow-up of the ileoanal anastomosis in children and young adults. Surgery. 1990;108(4):717–23; discussion 23–5.
Ording Olsen K, Juul S, Berndtsson I, Oresland T, Laurberg S. Ulcerative colitis: female fecundity before diagnosis, during disease, and after surgery compared with a population sample. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(1):15–9.
Rintala RJ, Lindahl HG. Proctocolectomy and J-pouch ileo-anal anastomosis in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(1):66–70.
Mahadevan U, Sandborn WJ. Diagnosis and management of pouchitis. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(6):1636–50.
Sandborn WJ. Pouchitis following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: definition, pathogenesis, and treatment. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(6):1856–60.
Gionchetti P, Amadini C, Rizzello F, Venturi A, Campieri M. Review article: treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and pouchitis. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16 Suppl 4:13–9.
Shen B, Achkar JP, Lashner BA, Ormsby AH, Remzi FH, Brzezinski A, et al. A randomized clinical trial of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole to treat acute pouchitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001;7(4):301–5.
Miglioli M, Barbara L, Di Febo G, Gozzetti G, Lauri A, Paganelli GM, et al. Topical administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid: a therapeutic proposal for the treatment of pouchitis. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(4):257.
Sambuelli A, Boerr L, Negreira S, Gil A, Camartino G, Huernos S, et al. Budesonide enema in pouchitis–a double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16(1):27–34.
Winter TA, Dalton HR, Merrett MN, Campbell A, Jewell DP. Cyclosporin A retention enemas in refractory distal ulcerative colitis and ‘pouchitis’. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28(8):701–4.
de Silva HJ, Ireland A, Kettlewell M, Mortensen N, Jewell DP. Short-chain fatty acid irrigation in severe pouchitis. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(20):1416–7.
Wischmeyer P, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF. Chronic pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: responses to butyrate and glutamine suppositories in a pilot study. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(10): 978–81.
Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Venturi A, Brigidi P, Matteuzzi D, Bazzocchi G, et al. Oral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2000;119(2):305–9.
Sarigol S, Wyllie R, Gramlich T, Alexander F, Fazio V, Kay M, et al. Incidence of dysplasia in pelvic pouches in pediatric patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999;28(4):429–34.
Thompson-Fawcett MW, Marcus V, Redston M, Cohen Z, McLeod RS. Risk of dysplasia in long-term ileal pouches and pouches with chronic pouchitis. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(2):275–81.
Veress B, Reinholt FP, Lindquist K, Lofberg R, Liljeqvist L. Long-term histomorphological surveillance of the pelvic ileal pouch: dysplasia develops in a subgroup of patients. Gastroenterology. 1995;109(4):1090–7.
Heuschen UA, Heuschen G, Autschbach F, Allemeyer EH, Herfarth C. Adenocarcinoma in the ileal pouch: late risk of cancer after restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001;16(2):126–30.
Burke PM, Neigut D, Kocoshis S, Chandra R, Sauer J. Correlates of depression in new onset pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1994;24(4):275–83.
Szajnberg N, Krall V, Davis P, Treem W, Hyams J. Psychopathology and relationship measures in children with inflammatory bowel disease and their parents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1993;23(3):215–32.
Engstrom I. Mental health and psychological functioning in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease: a comparison with children having other chronic illnesses and with healthy children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1992;33(3):563–82.
Engstrom I, Lindquist BL. Inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents: a somatic and psychiatric investigation. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1991;80(6–7):640–7.
Loonen HJ, Grootenhuis MA, Last BF, Koopman HM, Derkx HH. Quality of life in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease measured by a generic and a disease-specific questionnaire. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(3):348–54.
Szigethy E, Levy-Warren A, Whitton S, Bousvaros A, Gauvreau K, Leichtner AM, et al. Depressive symptoms and inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;39(4):395–403.
Otley A, Smith C, Nicholas D, Munk M, Avolio J, Sherman PM, et al. The IMPACT questionnaire: a valid measure of health-related quality of life in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35(4):557–63.
Loonen HJ, Grootenhuis MA, Last BF, de Haan RJ, Bouquet J, Derkx BH. Measuring quality of life in children with inflammatory bowel disease: the impact-II (NL). Qual Life Res. 2002;11(1):47–56.
Hyams JS, Davis P, Grancher K, Lerer T, Justinich CJ, Markowitz J. Clinical outcome of ulcerative colitis in children. J Pediatr. 1996;129(1):81–8.
Langholz E, Munkholm P, Davidsen M, Nielsen OH, Binder V. Changes in extent of ulcerative colitis: a study on the course and prognostic factors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996;31(3):260–6.
Meucci G, Vecchi M, Astegiano M, Beretta L, Cesari P, Dizioli P, et al. The natural history of ulcerative proctitis: a multicenter, retrospective study. Gruppo di Studio per le Malattie Infiammatorie Intestinali (GSMII). Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(2):469–73.
Hyams J, Davis P, Lerer T, Colletti RB, Bousvaros A, Leichtner A, et al. Clinical outcome of ulcerative proctitis in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997;25(2):149–52.
Ekbom A. Risk factors and distinguishing features of cancer in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1998;4(3):235–43.
Devroede GJ, Taylor WF, Sauer WG, Jackman RJ, Stickler GB. Cancer risk and life expectancy of children with ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 1971;285(1):17–21.
Ekbom A, Helmick C, Zack M, Adami HO. Ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer. A population-based study. N Engl J Med. 1990;323(18):1228–33.
Brostrom O, Lofberg R, Nordenvall B, Ost A, Hellers G. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis. An epidemiologic study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987;22(10):1193–9.
Gilat T, Fireman Z, Grossman A, Hacohen D, Kadish U, Ron E, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis. A population study in central Israel. Gastroenterology. 1988;94(4): 870–7.
Jess T, Simonsen J, Jorgensen KT, Pedersen BV, Nielsen NM, Frisch M. Decreasing risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 30 years. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(2):375–81.e1; quiz e13–4.
Broome U, Lofberg R, Veress B, Eriksson LS. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis: evidence for increased neoplastic potential. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 1995;22(5):1404–8.
Shetty K, Rybicki L, Brzezinski A, Carey WD, Lashner BA. The risk for cancer or dysplasia in ulcerative colitis patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(6): 1643–9.
Soetikno RM, Lin OS, Heidenreich PA, Young HS, Blackstone MO. Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(1):48–54.
Pardi DS, Loftus EV, Jr., Kremers WK, Keach J, Lindor KD. Ursodeoxycholic acid as a chemopreventive agent in patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(4):889–93.
Eaton JE, Silveira MG, Pardi DS, Sinakos E, Kowdley KV, Luketic VA, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid is associated with the development of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(9):1638–45.
Askling J, Dickman PW, Karlen P, Brostrom O, Lapidus A, Lofberg R, et al. Family history as a risk factor for colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2001;120(6):1356–62.
Rutter MD, Saunders BP, Wilkinson KH, Rumbles S, Schofield G, Kamm MA, et al. Cancer surveillance in longstanding ulcerative colitis: endoscopic appearances help predict cancer risk. Gut. 2004;53(12):1813–6.
Farraye FA, Odze RD, Eaden J, Itzkowitz SH. AGA technical review on the diagnosis and management of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(2):746–74, 74.e1–4; quiz e12–3.
Lindberg BU, Broome U, Persson B. Proximal colorectal dysplasia or cancer in ulcerative colitis. The impact of primary sclerosing cholangitis and sulfasalazine: results from a 20-year surveillance study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(1):77–85.
Velayos FS, Terdiman JP, Walsh JM. Effect of 5-aminosalicylate use on colorectal cancer and dysplasia risk: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(6):1345–53.
Velayos FS, Ullman TA. Looking forward to understanding and reducing colorectal cancer risk in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(1):47–9.
Farraye FA, Odze RD, Eaden J, Itzkowitz SH, McCabe RP, Dassopoulos T, et al. AGA medical position statement on the diagnosis and management of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(2):738–45.
Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, Dunlop MG, Thomas HJ, Evans GD, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59(5):666–89.
Shergill AK, Farraye FA. Toward a consensus on endoscopic surveillance of patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24(3):469-81
Griffiths AM, Sherman PM. Colonoscopic surveillance for cancer in ulcerative colitis: a critical review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997;24(2):202–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Higuchi, L., Regan, B., Bousvaros, A. (2016). Ulcerative Colitis. In: Guandalini, S., Dhawan, A., Branski, D. (eds) Textbook of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17169-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17169-2_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17168-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17169-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)