Abstract
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a central cellular signaling hub that senses and responds to different kinds of stress, mainly those triggered by impaired cellular energy homeostasis. Since this is of major importance for the heart, the kinase plays important roles for cardiovascular function in human health and disease. Here, we review recent progress on the molecular structure and role of AMPK and summarize regulation and biological actions of the AMPK pathway, in particular those relevant for the heart. Activation of the kinase is involved in the myocardial response to ischemia, pressure overload, and heart failure. Pharmacological activation of AMPK may prove to be a useful therapeutic strategy in the treatment of these pathologies.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The heart is one of the most energy-requiring organs, and it needs a perfect match of energy supply with energy demand to maintain its continuous contractile performance. The most relevant protein kinase in the context of metabolic stability and energy homeostasis is the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Many studies have confirmed the importance of AMPK signaling for a correct functioning of the cardiovascular system (reviewed in Arad et al. 2007; Dyck and Lopaschuk 2006; Kim et al. 2009; Young 2008; Zaha and Young 2012).
AMPK can be characterized as gatekeeper of cellular energy homeostasis and key regulator of energy metabolism, since it plays a central role in sensing and regulating energy state at the cellular, organ, and whole-body level (Winder and Hardie 1999; Hardie and Carling 1997). It is an evolutionary conserved and ubiquitously expressed protein kinase (Hardie 2007, 2011) which is thought to have evolved as one of the first kinase signaling pathways in unicellular eukaryotes in response to starvation for a carbon source. It only later during evolution developed into a more general metabolic and energy stress sensor (Hardie 2011, 2014b; Hardie and Ashford 2014).
Activation of AMPK is triggered by a diverse array of signals linked to limited energy availability in physiological and pathological situations, including extracellular (e.g., hormones, cytokines, nutrients) and intracellular stimuli (e.g., AMP, ADP, Ca2+) (Hardie et al. 2012a). AMPK activation occurs in the context of metabolic stress that decreases ATP and increases intracellular AMP, ADP, or Ca2+ concentrations. These include nutrient starvation, hypoxia (Hardie et al. 1999; Marsin et al. 2002), metabolic poisons (e.g., that inhibiting mitochondrial ATP production), or muscle contraction (Winder and Hardie 1996). AMPK activation involves covalent phosphorylation and allosteric effects of AMP, ADP, and possibly other metabolites (Calabrese et al. 2014). Generally, these activation mechanisms cooperate in a very complex manner, even though new findings suggest they may also occur independently (Scott et al. 2014). They are coordinated to activate AMPK in situations of energy deficit and aim at compensating ATP loss, mostly via accelerated catabolism and inhibited anabolism. However, AMPK exerts pleiotropic control not only of metabolic pathways but also of other physiological functions more indirectly linked to cell energetics. These include growth, proliferation, shape, and motility of cells, autophagy and apoptosis, and even central, systemic control of appetite in the hypothalamus (reviewed in Steinberg and Kemp 2009). In all these cases, AMPK mediates fast (acute) effects by regulating the activity of metabolic key enzymes and others and slow (chronic) effects by tuning gene expression of these proteins. The downstream targets of AMPK have made this kinase also a prime pharmacological target for treating type II diabetes, cancer, and other pathologies (Hardie 2008b; Zhang et al. 2009; Inoki et al. 2012; Srivastava et al. 2012).
It is to note that the majority of our knowledge on AMPK comes from noncardiac cells, and part of it may not be applicable to the heart. For example, this may concern the nature of activating stimuli and/or the threshold of activation (Zaha and Young 2012). The heart is a quite unique organ in several aspects, in particular in the context of its energy metabolism. The cardiac metabolic network is characterized by an unusual stability. Energy homeostasis in the heart is maintained by multiple regulatory mechanisms controlling cellular ATP production, utilization, and transfer, including allosteric regulations and feedback loops, micro-compartmentation, and metabolic channeling with concerted action of several metabolic and signaling kinases (Neumann et al. 2007; Saks et al. 2006). AMPK activation in the heart, in contrast to most other tissues, seems rather to act as a last safeguard during severe energy deprivation and in pathological situations. It plays an important role in the myocardial response to pathological stimuli like ischemia reperfusion (Kudo et al. 1995; Russell et al. 2004), pressure overload (Kim et al. 2012a; Tian et al. 2001), or heart failure (Sasaki et al. 2009). Thus, it functions also in the heart as a metabolic master regulator, orchestrating the cardiac response to various stress-related stimuli (Arad et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2009; Young 2008; Zaha and Young 2012). Importantly, pharmacological activation of AMPK also holds promise as a therapeutic strategy for treating different cardiovascular diseases (Calvert et al. 2008; Sasaki et al. 2009; Shinmura et al. 2007).
Here, we briefly review the AMPK structure, the way the kinase is activated, the regulated metabolic pathways and cellular functions relevant for the heart, as well as the available AMPK-targeted drugs. For any more extensive information on these or other issues of AMPK signaling, the reader is referred to the many excellent general reviews (Hardie 2014a, b, c; Hardie et al. 2012a; Mihaylova and Shaw 2011; Steinberg and Kemp 2009) and reviews on the role of AMPK in the heart (Kim and Dyck 2015; Kubli and Gustafsson 2014; Wang et al. 2012b; Zaha and Young 2012b).
10.1 Evolving Physiological Roles
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) was first described in studies on the regulation of lipid metabolism, where an enzyme activity was identified that is responsible for phosphorylation and inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMG-CoA reductase, HMGR) (Beg et al. 1980), and which was activated by AMP (Ferrer et al. 1985). Since both phosphorylations are inhibitory, AMPK was first perceived as a downregulator of lipid synthesis.
However, it then became evident that AMPK more generally functions as a cellular “fuel gauge” and can regulate many metabolic processes related to the cellular energy state. With the discovery that both AMP and ADP are activators (Oakhill et al. 2011; Xiao et al. 2011), AMPK regulation became quite similar to what has been described already 50 years ago by Atkinson as the so-called energy charge regulation of cell metabolism (Atkinson 1968). In fact, AMPK is able to respond to low energy charge by reorganizing energy and metabolic fluxes toward a nonstressed state. It thus represents a true control point for maintaining energy and metabolic homeostasis.
The role of AMPK has been even further extended, with AMPK activity also depending on physiological stimuli independent of the cellular energy charge like hormones and nutrients (Minokoshi et al. 2002, 2004). As mentioned above, more recently identified AMPK substrates reveal that AMPK signaling acts far beyond the control of primary metabolism, as, e.g., in proliferation, autophagy, and central appetite control. Thus, AMPK can now be defined as a “metabolic sensor” or “metabolic master switch.” However, also in these cases, AMPK signaling somehow acts to prevent a low energy state of cells, tissues, or the entire organism, by preventing ATP-consuming processes (growth, motility) or favoring potentially ATP-generating processes (autophagy, appetite).
10.2 Molecular Structure
The AMPK family consists of evolutionary conserved and ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine kinases that present complex structural and functional features. Structurally, AMPK occurs in vertebrates exclusively as an obligatory heterotrimeric protein complex composed of a catalytic subunit, α, and two regulatory subunits, β and γ. As a first layer of complexity, in vertebrates, each subunit occurs as different isoforms (α1, α2, β1, β2, γ1, γ2, and γ3) encoded by distinct genes (Carling 2004; Hardie et al. 2003), including some splice variants (of γ2 and γ3), generating a large variety of heterotrimeric complexes. Alternative promoters can further increase this complexity (Kahn et al. 2005). The precise physiological significance of all these isoforms is not yet entirely clear.
Much has been learned about the molecular structure of AMPK by crystallographic studies on AMPK domains and heterotrimeric core complexes (carrying larger truncations) (Townley and Shapiro 2007; Amodeo et al. 2007, 1; Chen et al. 2009, 2012, 2013; Oakhill et al. 2011; Xiao et al. 2007, 2011) and most of all by the most recently published structures of AMPK holo-complexes (Xiao et al. 2013; Calabrese et al. 2014; Li et al. 2014). The so far most complete X-ray structure covers the entire α2-subunit (with some internal truncations), the β1-subunit (lacking only the flexible N-terminal portion), and the entire γ1-subunit (Xiao et al. 2013) (Fig. 10.1). This work, stimulated by a growing interest in AMPK as a putative drug target, revealed the overall topology of the heterotrimer, the conserved global fold of large parts of the subunits, and suggested putative activation mechanisms. However, a high-resolution structure of full-length heterotrimeric complex in both active and inactive states is still lacking.
α-Subunit
The α-subunit contains a typical Ser/Thr protein kinase catalytic domain in its N-terminal part, with features conserved throughout the entire protein kinase superfamily (Hanks et al. 1988). It harbors a typical activation loop carrying the critical Thr172 residue which is phosphorylated for activation by AMPK upstream kinases like liver kinase B1 (LKB1) or Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase beta (CamKKβ ; see Chap. 4) (Hawley et al. 2003, 2005; Woods et al. 2003, 2005). This phosphorylation is considered as essential for AMPK activity (Hawley et al. 1996), although this has been recently challenged (Scott et al. 2014). Thr172 phosphorylation is also often used as a readout for AMPK activity, although this may not always be correct (see Chap. 4). The C-terminal part of the α-subunit carries different and important functionalities. Immediately downstream of the catalytic domain follows the autoinhibitory domain (AID) (Crute et al. 1998), which when fused to the kinase domain reduces AMPK activity as compared to kinase domain alone (Chen et al. 2009; Pang et al. 2007). In the further C-terminal sequence follows the so-called linker peptide and finally the very C-terminal region (~150 amino acids) which is required for association with the β-subunit. The latter also contains a long Ser/Thr-rich loop (not resolved in X-ray structures), as well as a nuclear export sequence [known to be functional in α2 (Kazgan et al. 2010)].
Of particular importance is the linker peptide, since it wraps around the γ-subunit like in a close embrace. A part of this linker peptide, first identified as α-hook, closely contacts γ-subunit (Xiao et al. 2011). Chen et al. (2013) more recently corrected the amino acid register for the electron density in this region, revealing the true γ-interacting sequence termed α-regulatory subunit interacting motif (α-RIM), interacting with CBS site 3 (see below) and with a pocket formed by a newly observed β-subunit loop. More recent structures of the near full-length heterotrimers confirmed these interactions of α-linker with β- and γ-subunits (Xiao et al. 2013) and its role in moving AID away from the kinase domain in the activated state (Li et al. 2014). In addition to Thr172, the α-subunit can be phosphorylated on several other residues both in vitro and in vivo. Most of these phosphorylations occur in the Ser/Thr-rich loop and seem to inhibit the activating Thr172 phosphorylation (see Chap. 4). Further structural studies will be necessary to delineate covalent and non-covalent activation of the kinase domain in molecular detail.
β-Subunit
The regulatory β-subunit represents the core of the heterotrimeric complex, since it provides a scaffold for binding of catalytic α- and regulatory γ-subunits. The N-terminal domain of the β-subunit carries an additional regulatory element, the conserved carbohydrate-binding module (CBM; also called glycogen-binding domain, GBD). Its structure complexed to beta-cyclodextrin has been solved (Polekhina et al. 2005), and it was shown that glucose α1-6-branched glycogen can behave as allosteric inhibitor, negatively regulating AMPK phosphorylation by its upstream kinases (McBride et al. 2009). In addition, CBM may serve to recruit AMPK to glycogen-bound downstream targets such as glycogen synthase (Hardie and Sakamoto 2006). The recent near full-length AMPK structures confirmed that glycogen binding moves CBM away from the α-kinase domain, while binding of pharmacological activators 991 and A769662 and autophosphorylation of β-S108, both at the α/β-interface (see Chap. 4), closely attach CBM to the kinase domain (Xiao et al. 2013; Li et al. 2014). The former conformation seems to be rather inhibitory, while the latter strongly activates AMPK. Thus, CBM is part of an allosteric regulatory site, which may also sense cellular energy reserves in the form of glycogen and mediate effects of certain pharmacological activators. The large very N-terminal portion of the β-subunit is not resolved in the known X-ray structures, and its function is not entirely clear. An N-terminal myristoylation affects activation (Oakhill et al. 2010) and could mediate membrane interaction. The sequence could also be involved in the interaction of AMPK with other proteins (Klaus et al. 2013).
γ-Subunit
All γ-subunits contain in their C-terminal part four tandem cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) repeats, a motif named by analogy to the cystathionine β-synthase in which it was first identified (Bateman 1997). In AMPK γ-subunits, the four CBS sites (numbered CBS 1 to CBS 4 according to their occurrence in the sequence) constitute a flattened disk with one CBS repeat in each quadrant and two pairs of CBS motifs assembling into a so-called Bateman domain. Four potential binding sites for adenylates (AMP, ADP, ATP) are created in the cleft between the CBS motifs, numbered according to the CBS motif that provides the conserved Asp for adenine ribose interaction (Kemp 2004). According to several crystal structures of the mammalian γ1-subunit in the presence of various nucleotides (Chen et al. 2012, 2013; Xiao et al. 2007, 2011, 2013), it appears that only CBS sites 1, 3, and 4 are functional, while the site 2 is different and always empty. The γ2- and γ3-isoforms contain long N-terminal extensions, which can be subject to truncation by RNA splicing, and whose molecular structure and function are currently unknown. The different γ-subunit isoforms and splice variants may be involved in protein/protein interaction and confer different cellular localization and function (Pinter et al. 2012).
10.3 Localization
Tissue Specificity; Cardiac AMPK
AMPK isoforms show some differences in their tissue- and developmental-specific expression patterns, although the physiological significance is still uncertain. There is no strict tissue specificity of AMPK isoforms, but increasing evidence suggests that a given tissue expresses a specific subset of AMPK heterotrimers which may be linked to particular signaling pathways in this tissue (Table 10.1). Studies with transgenic mice lacking specific α- and β-subunits have contributed to progress in this field (Viollet et al. 2009). While the α1β1γ1 complex is probably the most abundant in a vast majority of cell types, differences seem to occur in the amount of additional isoforms in a given tissue.
The heart contains high levels of the α2-isoform, which is much less expressed in the skeletal muscle and liver and almost absent in the brain. The β2-isoform is abundant in the heart and also in the muscle and brain. In addition to the γ1-isoform, the heart expresses a specific intermediate-length γ2-splice variant (γ2-3B), while γ3 seems to be quite specifically expressed only in the skeletal muscle (Stapleton et al. 1996; Thornton et al. 1998; Pinter et al. 2012). There are also pathological and developmental changes in cardiac AMPK expression. The α2-, β2-, and γ2-isoforms are all upregulated by pressure overload or heart failure in rodents, although in patients rather the content of α1, β1, and γ2 (an intermediate form) increases with different forms of cardiomyopathy (Tian et al. 2001; Kim et al. 2012a). During embryonic development in rodents, γ1 increases, while high levels of γ3 disappear, and the embryonically predominant full-length γ2-form is replaced by γ2-3B in the heart but by short γ2b in other tissues (Pinter et al. 2012). These developmental and tissue particularities may also explain why γ2-gene mutations in the CBS domains cause hereditary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but no other pathological symptoms (see Chap. 6). Full-length γ2 and γ2-3B share an N-terminal domain with unknown function that could localize the AMPK complex to specific compartments or signaling pathways (Pinter et al. 2012). Total cardiac AMPK activity increases after birth, contributing to the switch toward the predominant use of fatty acids (Makinde et al. 1997). AMPK levels may also be determined by ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation (Qi et al. 2008; Moreno et al. 2010).
Subcellular Distribution
The subcellular distribution and recruitment of AMPK isoforms to specific cellular sites is increasingly recognized as an important factor for their signaling function. AMPK is generally observed as a soluble complex with diffuse cytosolic localization. However, at least α2-containing complexes in their activated form, e.g., after exercise in the skeletal muscle, also translocate into the nucleus to phosphorylate nuclear substrates such as transcription factors, histones, and histone deacetylases (McGee et al. 2003, 2008; Suzuki et al. 2007). Minor portions of AMPK may associate with cellular structures like specific membranes, where processes are regulated by AMPK (e.g., ion channel activity, cell polarity, or cell junction formation) (Forcet and Billaud 2007; Andersen and Rasmussen 2012; Nakano and Takashima 2012; Ramírez Ríos et al. 2014). Myristoylation of the AMPK β-subunit can localize the kinase complex to membranes and increases its activability, thus possibly favoring activation of membrane-bound complexes (Suzuki et al. 2007; Oakhill et al. 2010).
Multiprotein Complexes
AMPK can also be recruited into specific complexes via interaction with its upstream kinases, downstream substrates, or more general with scaffolding proteins. However, the AMPK interactome is only partially known so far from some targeted and non-biased interaction studies conducted by us and others (e.g., Behrends et al. 2010; Klaus et al. 2012), and more research is needed on this issue, in particular in the heart. AMPK interaction with LKB1, its major upstream kinase in the heart, could recruit AMPK to places of LKB1 localization, including the mitochondrial surface or E-cadherin in adherens junctions (Sebbagh et al. 2009). Close co-localization of both, AMPK and LKB1, can also be mediated by membrane interaction of both, farnesylated LKB1 and myristoylated AMPK (Houde et al. 2014).
Scaffolding proteins can in principle provide high specificity in cell signaling by isolating activated kinases from bulk signaling and directing the information flow into specific pathways. In the heart, for example, AMPK competes with p38 MAPK for binding to the scaffolding protein TAK-1–binding protein-1, thus blunting p38 activation during ischemia (Li et al. 2005). Mitochondrial VDAC may represent yet another anchoring protein that recruits AMPK to this organelle (Strogolova et al. 2012). Most interestingly, the scaffold protein axin together with the Ragulator complex at the lysosomal surface has been proposed as important regulators of AMPK activation (Zhang et al. 2013, 2014). These data support a model where axin bound to LKB1 recruits AMPK in the AMP-bound state, leading to AMPK phosphorylation and activation. Further, in particular under nutrient-poor conditions, the axin-LKB1-AMPK complex seems to interact with the Ragulator complex which is tethered via its LAMTOR1 component to the lysosomal surface. The Ragulator complex, apparently by its interaction with the lysosomal v-type ATPase, seems to be an independent sensor of cellular nutrient conditions. It is known to recruit the nutrient-signaling TORC1 complex (see Chap. 5) to lysosomes under nutrient-rich conditions (Bar-Peled and Sabatini 2014), thus suggesting reciprocal recruitment and activation of axin-LKB1-AMPK or mTORC1, depending on the cellular nutrient state (Hardie 2014c). It is currently unknown whether such regulation exists in the heart.
There is also some evidence that AMPK subunit isoforms determine specific protein/protein interactions. The β-subunit may in some cases confer substrate specificity, as has been shown in yeast (Vincent and Carlson 1999) and plants orthologs (Polge et al. 2008), but with mammalian AMPK [IntAct database (Kerrien et al. 2012)]. We recently found the β2-isoform interacting with Mu- and Pi-type glutathione transferases (GSTs) to favor glutathionylation of the α-subunit (Klaus et al. 2013). However, in the case of fumarate hydratase (FH), we identified a specific interaction with α2-containing AMPK complexes to facilitate FH phosphorylation (Klaus et al. 2012).
10.4 Activation
AMPK integrates various intra- and extracellular signals and maintains cross talk with other signaling pathways. This makes the kinase a central signaling hub in sensing and regulating cellular energetics and ATP-dependent functions. Indeed, the most recent research revealed that AMPK activation is much more complex than initially anticipated and that it depends on multiple covalent modifications and allosteric effectors (Fig. 10.2). Such AMPK regulation evolved from a more simple state as, e.g., in the yeast AMPK homologues that lack allosteric activation by AMP to the more complex regulation present in vertebrates.
Covalent Regulation by Phosphorylation
The phosphorylation state of the conserved threonine within the kinase domain activation loop (conventionally referred as Thr172) determines the primary activation of AMPK. As compared to an inactive state, this phosphorylation can increase kinase activity by more than 100-fold (Suter et al. 2006). The AMPK phosphorylation state depends on the balance between the activity of different upstream kinases and phosphatases. The two well-established upstream kinases are tumor suppressor kinase complex LKB1-STRAD-MO25 (Woods et al. 2003; Shaw et al. 2004; Hawley et al. 2003) and Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinases (CamKK), in particular CamKKβ (Hawley et al. 2005; Woods et al. 2005; Hurley et al. 2005). LKB1 is the major AMPK kinase in most cells, including cardiomyocytes. However, this kinase seems to mostly exhibit constitutive activity and may thus not be the limiting step in AMPK activation. More recent studies suggest that close co-localization of LKB1 with AMPK involving the scaffold protein axin and the lysosomal surface may be necessary for efficient AMPK activation via the LKB pathway (see Chap. 3; Zhang et al. 2013, 2014). In some cell types, in particular in the brain but much less in the heart, AMPK is activated predominantly in a Ca2+-dependent manner by CamKKβ. Such CamKKβ-mediated AMPK activation might anticipate an increasing energy turnover that accompanies a rise in cytosolic Ca2+ during muscle contraction, but its role in the heart is not well understood. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) has been suggested as another AMPK kinase (Herrero‐Martín et al. 2009) and also as an AMPK substrate (Kim et al. 2012b). TAK-1 is present in the heart, but not activated during ischemia, and it is unclear whether it acts via direct AMPK phosphorylation (Xie et al. 2006b).
Protein phosphatases are possibly the more critical parameter governing the α-Thr172 phosphorylation state, and this may also apply to the heart. AMPK covalent activation is modulated by the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) (Garcia-Haro et al. 2010), the protein phosphatase 2C (PP2Cα) (Sanders et al. 2007a), and the calcium-mediated protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) (Park et al. 2013). It was also proposed that α-SNAP may exhibit phosphatase activity on AMPK Thr172 according to in vitro dephosphorylation assay (Wang and Brautigan 2013). However, in tissues including the heart and endothelial cells, especially expression levels PP2C and 2A, respectively, correlate well with AMPK activation (Wang and Unger 2005; Wu et al. 2007).
There seems to be a cross talk of AMPK with many other cellular signaling pathways. Mainly the α-Thr172 phosphorylation state is negatively controlled by hierarchical phosphorylation at other sites in the AMPK heterotrimer, in particular in the α-Ser/Thr-rich loop. Protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) that is activated under glucose-rich conditions by insulin signaling is inhibiting AMPK by phosphorylation at rat α1-Ser485 (much less so at the equivalent α2-Ser491) which reduces phosphorylation at the activating α-Thr172 (Hawley et al. 2014; Horman et al. 2006). Thus, hyperactivation of PKB/Akt as occurring in many tumor cells, and also in the heart under doxorubicin treatment (see Chap. 6), can strongly downregulate AMPK activation, with negative effects on proliferation control and cell energetics, respectively. Similar inhibitory phosphorylations of AMPK were reported for protein kinase GSK3β (Suzuki et al. 2013) and protein kinase A (PKA) (Hurley et al. 2006; Djouder et al. 2010). In the latter case, not the Ser/Thr-loop phosphorylations (including Ser485/Ser491) seem to be inhibitory but rather another one at α-Ser173 (Djouder et al. 2010). The physiological rationale underlying AMPK inhibition by GSK3β and PKA is, however, less obvious. AMPK is further negatively controlled by the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in a more complex manner, involving negative feedback loops. While active AMPK can reduce MEK/ERK signaling via phosphorylation of upstream B-Raf (Shen et al. 2013), active ERK can reduce AMPK signaling by inhibitory phosphorylation of the AMPK upstream kinase LKB1 (Zheng et al. 2009). Further phosphorylation sites were identified in both AMPK α- and β-subunits, many of them targeted by autophosphorylation, but their functional role remains uncertain. As recently discovered, (auto)phosphorylation of β-Ser108 close to the glycogen-binding domain seems to be an important second allosteric regulatory site (see below).
Endocrine Signals
Information about the cellular environment and whole-body energy and nutrient state is linked to AMPK signaling via endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine mechanisms. These include a diverse array of hormones and cytokines (Table 10.2). They regulate AMPK mainly by triggering AMPK phosphorylation via upstream kinases, and this regulation often occurs in a tissue-specific manner. Best studied are probably the orexigenic/anorexigenic hormones ghrelin and leptin. In peripheral tissues, leptin activates AMPK to regulate fatty acid oxidation and glucose uptake. In hypothalamus, leptin inhibits and ghrelin activates AMPK to decrease and increase appetite, respectively, in order to regulate food intake (Steinberg and Kemp 2009; Steinberg 2013). Other endocrine factors that affect AMPK activity are sex hormones that act via LKB1 (McInnes et al. 2012) and angiotensin 2 (Nagata et al. 2004; Steinberg 2013). Endocrine signals in the heart are discussed in Chap. 6.
Calcium Signals
As described above, cellular calcium can regulate the Thr172 phosphorylation state of AMPK via calcium-homeostasis-related kinases in phosphatases, in particular CamKKβ (Hawley et al. 2005) and PP2A (Park et al. 2013), respectively. This can also be demonstrated with calcium ionophores (e.g., A23187) in LKB1-deficient cells. Ca2+- and AMP-dependent AMPK activation occurs independently and can be synergistic, since AMP binding (see below) protects the Ca2+-induced phosphorylation (Fogarty et al. 2010).
Non-covalent Regulation
The second major mechanism of AMPK activation relies on non-covalent, allosteric regulation. It mainly occurs by AMP and ADP, competing with MgATP for binding to the γ-subunit CBS domains. At a low cellular energy state, increases of AMP and, as discovered more recently, also of ADP can be sensed by AMPK as altered AMP/ATP and ADP/ATP concentration ratios (Oakhill et al. 2011; Xiao et al. 2011). In many cell types and in particular in the heart and skeletal muscle, breakdown of ATP to ADP at the onset of high workload or cellular stress has only minor immediate effects on ATP levels. Due to the energy buffer and transfer function of the CK/PCr system, global and local ATP pools are rapidly replenished (Schlattner et al. 2006; Wallimann et al. 2011). Thus, ATP is not a very suitable signal for indicating developing energy deficits. However, minor decreases in ATP levels lead to more pronounced relative increases in free ADP and even more in AMP due to the adenylate kinase (AK) reaction. Under these conditions, AK uses two ADPs to regenerate ATP and AMP, thus increasing AMP concentrations from the sub-micromolar range under resting conditions to the lower micromolar range (Hardie et al. 2011). To a lesser extent, AMP levels also depend on pyrophosphates (cleaving the β-phosphate bond of ATP) and the activity of AMP degradation pathways [AMP-deaminase and 5′-nucleotidase, whose inhibition may be useful to activate AMPK (Kulkarni et al. 2011)]. As a consequence, a decrease in ATP levels by only 10 % translates into a ten- to 100-fold increase in AMP, making AMP an ideal second messenger of energy stress. Regulation of AMPK activation by the balance between ATP, ADP, and AMP concentrations resembles to what was put forward by Atkinson 50 years ago as “energy charge” regulation (Atkinson 1968; Hardie and Hawley 2001; Xiao et al. 2011; Oakhill et al. 2011).
The molecular basis of AMPK activation by AMP and ADP is not yet fully understood but involves binding to CBS sites on the γ-subunit that trigger multiple interconnected mechanisms. Binding of AMP leads to an up to a ~tenfold allosteric activation of AMPK (Gowans et al. 2013). Earlier in vitro studies suggested that the α2-subunit has a higher sensitivity to this allosteric activation (Salt et al. 1998a). In addition, AMP and ADP binding increase the phosphorylation status of α-Thr172 through protection of the α-subunit activation loop from dephosphorylation by phosphatases (Davies et al. 1995; Xiao et al. 2011). In addition, AMP (but not ADP) promotes α-Thr172 phosphorylation by LKB1 but not by CamKKβ (Gowans et al. 2013). The γ-subunit CBS sites involved in these allosteric effects are sites 1, 3, and 4. However, there is some debate on the role of these sites, in particular which sites mediate direct allosteric activation and which ones the protection of dephosphorylation. There is a consensus that changes of AMP and ADP concentrations in the physiological range are mainly sensed at sites 1 and 3, called exchangeable binding sites. Here, free AMP and ADP probably compete mainly with free ATP, since the most abundant Mg2+-complexed ATP has tenfold lower affinity for the CBS sites (Xiao et al. 2011). Sites 1 and 3 differ about 30-fold in their affinity for adenylates, and initial evidence suggested site 1 as high-affinity site, sensing low micromolar concentrations of AMP for allosteric activation, and site 3 as low affinity site, involved in protection of dephosphorylation at higher AMP and ADP concentrations (Xiao et al. 2011). However, the role of CBS sites may not be defined as clearly. A more recent study suggests that site 3 is the most important for allosteric activation (Chen et al. 2012). Indeed, mutation of site 3 residues abrogates allosteric AMPK activation (Chen et al. 2012; Scott et al. 2004), and this site is also in contact with the α-subunit (see below). In addition, site 4 may play a role in allosteric activation. This is a tight AMP-binding site, generally reported as non-exchangeable site since purified protein or protein crystals always retain AMP in this site, even when treated with ATP. However, Chen et al. (Chen et al. 2012) observed ATP at site 4 when co-crystallizing AMPK core complex in the presence of 2 mM free ATP, a very high concentration that may not be physiologically relevant. However, ATP binding to site 4 forces site 3 to remain empty, and this affects allosteric AMPK activation, consistent with the model of CBS site 3 being the major site of allosteric regulation. A complicating fact is that some nucleotide-binding CBS residues can interact with nucleotides at different sites, thus precluding a clear-cut functional assignment of CBS sites (Hardie 2014c).
All known direct AMPK activators act via allosteric effects (see Chap. 7). They either act like AMP at the CBS sites (e.g., 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside, AICAR; Giri et al. 2004) or they exert their effects by binding to an entirely different site, discovered only recently (e.g., A-769662; Scott et al. 2008). This site is situated in a cleft between the α-kinase domain and the β-CBM domain and stabilized by autophosphorylation of the β-Ser108. Occupation of this α/β site confers protection of dephosphorylation. It can be speculated that there exists an endogenous activating metabolite binding at the α/β site, and/or an endogenous activating kinase, able to phosphorylate Ser108 (Hardie 2014c).
All these allosteric mechanisms, whether they involve binding events at the CBS sites or at the novel α/β site, require close communication between the sensing subunit (γ or β) and the catalytic subunit (α). We and our collaborators have proposed that subunit communication and activation occur via a conformational switch within the AMPK full-length complex (Riek et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2012). Indeed, AMP-induced conformational changes have been evidenced through structural studies by SAXS (Riek et al. 2008), electron microscopy (Zhu et al. 2011), and X-ray crystallography (Chen et al. 2012) within different parts of the AMPK heterotrimer. Recent structures of the holo-AMPK complex in its active state, as well as low-resolution structures in Thr172 phosphorylated and unphosphorylated states, suggest that conformational changes and intramolecular movements involve α-RIM, α-AID, the two lobes of the α-kinase domain, as well as the entire γ-subunit (Chen et al. 2013; Xiao et al. 2011; Calabrese et al. 2014; Li et al. 2014). High-resolution apo-AMPK structures of holo-AMPK complex will be necessary to answer the remaining questions, in particular how a different occupation of CBS sites communicates via α-RIM and α-AID with the kinase domain. Collectively, these non-covalent AMPK activation mechanisms add an important layer to the regulation of AMPK activity, since they allow a direct response to intracellular metabolites.
Exercise and Hypoxia
Given the sensitivity of AMPK for adenine nucleotides, any physiological or pathological situation that changes adenylate ratios will affect AMPK signaling. AMPK is activated by a plethora of stimuli such as metabolic stresses and drugs and xenobiotics that either (1) inhibit ATP production, such as starvation for glucose (Salt et al. 1998b) and oxygen (Marsin et al. 2002), or metabolic poisons or (2) increase ATP consumption, such as muscle contraction (Lantier et al. 2014). Muscle contraction and exercise in general trigger rapid activation of AMPK (Chen et al. 2003), and this may be one of the fastest mechanisms that mediate metabolic adaptation to exercise. When AMPK is knocked out in the skeletal muscle of β1β2 transgenic mice, they lose exercise tolerance and glucose uptake during contractions, become physically inactive, and present an importantly impaired capacity for running linked to reductions in skeletal muscle mitochondrial content (O’Neill et al. 2011). During hypoxia, from the early stage on, a drastic drop in the ATP/AMP level occurs, resulting in AMPK activation.
Other Covalent and Non-covalent Regulations
In addition to the above-described conventional regulation of AMPK, there is increasing evidence for additional activation and inactivation mechanisms. Here, different secondary protein modifications play an important role. Myristoylation at Gly2 in the β-subunit increases the sensitivity of AMPK for allosteric activation and promotes Thr172 phosphorylation (Oakhill et al. 2010). The β2-subunit, but not β1, is sumoylated by the E3-small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) ligase protein inhibitor of activated STAT (PIASy), which attaches SUMO2 but not SUMO1 moieties. This seems to enhance AMPK activity and competes with ubiquitination that results in inactivation of AMPK complex (Rubio et al. 2013). Ubiquitination of AMPK occurs via complexes of laforin (a dual-specificity protein phosphatase) and malin (an E3-ubiquitin ligase), mainly at the β-subunit, and leads to K63-linked ubiquitin chains that are involved in functions different from proteasome degradation (Moreno et al. 2010). Glutathionylation at Cys299 and Cys304 in the α-subunit activates the kinase under oxidative conditions in cellular models and is favored by binding to certain GST isoforms (Klaus et al. 2013). This latter mechanism may be part of a more general redox regulation of the kinase (Han et al. 2010; Jeon et al. 2012). ROS and RNS activate AMPK, but it is unclear whether this happens via increases in ADP and AMP concentrations or whether noncanonical mechanisms at the level of AMPK (like glutathionylation) or upstream kinases play a role. Vice versa, AMPK regulates NADPH homeostasis and an entire battery of ROS-detoxifying enzymes. Another non-covalent allosteric regulator is glycogen as well as other synthetic branched oligosaccharides that inhibit AMPK activity by binding to the β-CBM domain (McBride et al. 2009) (see above).
10.5 Regulation
Metabolism
AMPK regulates cellular metabolism at many levels, reducing anabolism (ATP-demanding processes) and upregulating catabolism (ATP-generating processes) to restore a healthy energy status at a cellular and whole-body level. To do so, AMPK directly acts on metabolic key enzymes and signaling proteins (acute effects) or on transcription factors (chronic effects, see Fig. 10.2) (Hardie et al. 2012b). Interestingly, drugs of the two main classes of antidiabetic drugs, biguanides (e.g., metformin) and thiazolidinediones (e.g., rosiglitazone), both act at least in part through activation of AMPK (Morrison et al. 2011; Musi et al. 2002). In the heart, AMPK is part of the signaling network that allows a predominant use of fatty acid oxidation for ATP generation and also provides the metabolic flexibility to respond to changes in substrate availability, thus continuously matching ATP generation and demand. Failing of AMPK to provide this flexibility under certain pathological conditions can contribute to the pathogenesis of heart failure (see Chap. 6, reviewed in Kim and Dyck 2015).
Lipid Metabolism
Activated AMPK induces transfer of fatty acid transporter (FAT/CD36) to the plasma membrane to increase fatty acid uptake (Luiken et al. 2003). AMPK further inhibits ATP-consuming lipid synthesis, notably in the liver and in the adipose tissue, but stimulates lipid catabolism for ATP generation. Phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) decreases ACC-catalyzed formation of malonylCoA a precursor in the fatty acid synthesis pathway. At the same time, reducing malonylCoA levels will relieve their inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT-1), which triggers fatty acid import into mitochondria and subsequent β-oxidation. AMPK also phosphorylates and inhibits other anabolic enzymes: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), a key enzyme in cholesterol synthesis that converts 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA into mevalonic acid, and glycerol phosphate acyltransferase, involved in triglyceride and phospholipid synthesis (Liao et al. 2014). Since AMPK acts by stimulating lipolysis and inhibiting lipogenesis, its pharmacological activation seems to be useful to treat obesity, diabetes type 2, and more generally the metabolic syndrome (Hardie 2008a; O’Neill et al. 2013).
Carbohydrate Metabolism
AMPK also interferes with carbohydrate metabolism at different levels, including carbohydrate uptake, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis. Activated AMPK promotes cellular glucose uptake via glucose transporters GLUT1 (expressed in most cells except muscle, liver, and adipose tissue) and GLUT4 (expressed mainly in adipose tissue and striated muscle). AMPK activation promotes GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane (Kurth-Kraczek et al. 1999) and stimulates GLUT4 transcription by phosphorylation of the transcription repressor histone deacetylase 5 (HDAC5) which reduces its affinity for the GLUT4 promoter (McGee et al. 2008). GLUT1-dependent glucose uptake is activated via an unclear mechanism that involves GLUT1 already located at the plasma membrane (Barnes et al. 2002). Notably in case of energy deprivation in the heart, AMPK phosphorylates and activates the 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFKFB) to increase the steady-state concentration of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (Marsin et al. 2000). This metabolite then acts as an allosteric activator of glycolysis by stimulating the glycolytic enzyme 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase (PFK1), a rate-limiting glycolytic enzyme. Once activated, AMPK also represses anabolic glucose storage into glycogen by directly phosphorylating and inactivating glycogen synthase (Bultot et al. 2012). Finally, AMPK affects carbohydrate metabolism indirectly by phosphorylation of the mTor–raptor complex, which was proposed to modulate insulin sensitivity by regulating protein levels of IRS-1 (Haruta et al. 2000; Kahn et al. 2005).
Transcription
AMPK phosphorylates and regulates various transcription factors and coregulators, including forkhead box O (FoxO) proteins FoxO1 and FoxO3 (Kubli and Gustafsson 2014) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ coactivator-1a (PGC-1α) (Patten and Arany 2012), both having important roles in the regulation of cardiac energetic homeostasis and beyond. PGC-1α is a central transcriptional coactivator that orchestrates mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics, fuel transport and/or consumption, angiogenesis, and antioxidative effects. PGC-1α phosphorylation by AMPK results in improved metabolism of fatty acids and more efficient energy utilization (Schilling and Kelly 2011). FoxO transcription factors regulate expression of genes involved in the antioxidative stress response and in the balance between apoptosis, autophagy, and energy metabolism. These functions are critical for cardiac function (Ronnebaum and Patterson 2010). FoxO-regulated genes also encode proteins that contribute to improved energy metabolism, including FAT/CD36 and GLUT4 indirect metabolic effects.
Growth and Proliferation
Many effects of AMPK on cell growth, cell cycle, and autophagy are mediated by another evolutionary conserved serine/threonine protein kinase further downstream, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTor). mTor occurs as two functional multiprotein complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2 (Loewith et al. 2002). mTORC1 comprises mTOR, raptor, mLST8, and PRAS40 and is regulated by cellular energy and nutrient state, whereas mTORC2 is not. Raptor also plays a significant role in intracellular localization of mTORC1 in response to amino acid availability, which is an essential cellular signal for mTORC1 activation (Sancak et al. 2008). Activation of mTORC1 occurs at the lysosomal surface as a part of complex, multiprotein assemblies (Bar-Peled and Sabatini 2014). Active mTORC1 stimulates several ATP-demanding cellular processes such as translation, transcription (protein synthesis), ribosome biogenesis, mitochondrial metabolism, proliferation, and autophagy. Unlike mTORC2, mTORC1 is sensitive to rapamycin, a molecule used as immunorepressor due to its capacity to downregulate protein synthesis, notably of antibodies.
Two important substrates of mTORC1 in its response to nutrients and cellular energy status are S6 kinase (S6K) and eIF4E binding proteins (4EBPs). Raptor, a component of mTORC1, functions as a scaffolding protein to recruit such substrates for phosphorylation (Nojima et al. 2003). S6K is a ribosomal kinase regulating translation initiation, mRNA processing, and cell growth and notably enhances protein synthesis once phosphorylated. 4EBPs are translational repressors that are inactivated upon phosphorylation by mTORC1. To precisely regulate these mTORC1-dependent, energy-demanding processes, AMPK inhibits mTORC1 signaling through two distinct mechanisms (Inoki et al. 2012). First, it directly phosphorylates raptor at the conserved Ser722 and Ser792, leading to recruitment of 14-3-3 protein and an inactive mTORC1 complex (Gwinn et al. 2008). Second, it phosphorylates tuberous sclerosis protein 2 (TSC2), a GTPase-activating protein (GAP), thus stimulating the downstream GTPase Ras homologue enriched in brain protein (Rheb). This transforms Rheb from its GTP-bound form that activates mTORC1 into its inactive, GDP-bound form (Inoki et al. 2003). This latter pathway of mTORC1 regulation by AMPK may depend on cell type and tissue (Wolff et al. 2011). Collectively, the AMPK and mTORC1 pathways serve as a signaling nexus to regulate cellular metabolism, energy homeostasis, and cell growth. Disorder of each pathway may strongly contribute to the development of pathologies such as type II diabetes or cancer.
Autophagy and Apoptosis
While AMPK activation by upstream kinases is well studied, much less is known about regulation of AMPK stability and activity by components of the ubiquitin–proteasome system, responsible for cellular recognition and degradation of proteins. Growing evidence suggests that AMPK regulates overall proteasome activity and individual components of the ubiquitin–proteasome system (Ronnebaum et al. 2014). Autophagy is important for maintaining homeostasis when nutrient supply becomes limiting. It is important for the cellular turnover of proteins and organelles and is rapidly upregulated during stress. In metabolic disorders including obesity and diabetes, autophagy is reduced, leading to accumulation of protein aggregates and dysfunctional organelles which can contribute to pathogenesis.
10.6 Cardiac Signaling in Health and Disease
Cardiac AMPK activity is increased by many stimuli, acting either via upstream kinases or modulation of adenylate levels under both pathological and physiological stress and involving various hormones and cytokines (Fig. 10.2; Zaha and Young 2012). However, within the physiological range, the role of cardiomyocyte AMPK is possibly different from other cell types, mainly because of the remarkable metabolic stability of this organ maintained by multiple other mechanisms. Two classical physiological stimuli of AMPK, exercise and hypoxia, also act on cardiac AMPK (Coven et al. 2003; Frederich et al. 2005; Musi et al. 2005) and promote the metabolism of glucose and fatty acids via its different downstream targets. However, it is unclear whether this activation is due to altered energy state as in the skeletal muscle or rather relies on alternative upstream signaling. At least one other physiological AMPK stimulus, nutrient deprivation, seems not to operate in a canonical manner in the heart (Clark et al. 2004). Apart of these key roles, cardiac AMPK mediates the cardiomyocyte response to a variety of other physiological or pathological situations, including some forms of pressure overload, heart failure, intracellular calcium overload, or reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (Dolinsky et al. 2009; Zaha and Young 2012).
Ischemia
As a pathological stimulus, ischemia is the best studied both in form of no-flow and partial ischemia in isolated perfused animal hearts, as well as regional ischemia due to coronary ligation in vivo (Kim et al. 2011; Kudo et al. 1996; Paiva et al. 2011; Russell et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2009), for a review see Young (2008). They lead to rapid and lasting AMPK activation. As already mentioned, oxidative stress may be a determinant of such activation, acting through different forms of ROS (Sartoretto et al. 2011; Zou et al. 2002). In endothelial cells, it is rather peroxynitrite formation that affects AMPK via the protein kinase Cζ-LKB1 axis (Xie et al. 2006a; Zou et al. 2004), while in other non-excitable cells, it may be rather an ROS-induced Ca2+ release that triggers the CamKKβ axis (Mungai et al. 2011). ROS-facilitated glutathionylation of AMPK (see Chap. 4) as observed in cellular systems represents yet another direct activation mechanism but still has to be verified in cardiomyocytes (Klaus et al. 2013; Zmijewski et al. 2010). However, the signaling function of ROS may be lost at more intense oxidative stress that inactivates AMPK (Gratia et al. 2012). Stress resulting from many but not all forms of pressure overload also results in AMPK activation, mainly increasing glucose uptake and glycolysis (Allard et al. 2007; Li et al. 2007; Tian et al. 2001; Zhang et al. 2008), as well as changing the gene expression profile (Hu et al. 2011).
Endocrine Regulation
Cardiac AMPK is also regulated by extracellular signals as adiponectin (Shibata et al. 2004), leptin (Minokoshi et al. 2002), resistin (Kang et al. 2011), ghrelin (Kola et al. 2005), IL6 (Kelly et al. 2004), and CNTF (Watt et al. 2006). Best studied are probably the hormones adiponectin and leptin (the latter at least during ischemia; McGaffin et al. 2009) which activate cardiac AMPK or the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 which appears to reduce AMPK content and activity (Zaha and Young 2012). Cardiac AMPK seems to be involved in the positive effects of adiponectin for cardioprotection during ischemia and for reduced cardiac hypertrophy (Shibata et al. 2004, 2005). Also, leptin may modulate AMPK in the heart, since impaired leptin signaling correlates with reduced AMPK activation and metabolic defects or reduced postconditioning after ischemia (Bouhidel et al. 2008; McGaffin et al. 2009). Proinflammatory cytokines like IL-6 rather reduce AMPK protein and activation (Ko et al. 2009), although there may be opposite effects in specific tissues like skeletal muscle due to a specific autocrine–paracrine effect (Kelly et al. 2004). Another cytokine with functions in the heart is macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), which is involved in AMPK activation during ischemia and hypoxia, and its decrease with age in mice seems to reduce AMPK activation during ischemia (Ma et al. 2010; Miller et al. 2008).
Protein Turnover
AMPK has been suggested to play an important role in regulating cardiac turnover of proteins and organelles (Baskin and Taegtmeyer 2011; Zaha and Young 2012), also during ischemia. This process is critical for the survival and self-renewal of terminally differentiated cells as cardiomyocytes and requires tightly regulated degradation of misfolded and damaged proteins or damaged/dysfunctional organelles (as, e.g., mitochondria) and their replacement by new and functional entities. Recent evidence suggests that AMPK regulates degradation at two levels. Individual proteins are eliminated by the ubiquitin–proteasome system, with AMPK activating the cardiac ubiquitin ligases atrogin-1 and MuRF. Whole organelles are digested by stimulation of autophagy via activation of ULK1 and inhibition of mTOR (Baskin and Taegtmeyer 2011; Hardie et al. 2012a; Zaha and Young 2012). Thus, under conditions of metabolic stress, AMPK activation inhibits protein synthesis (via mTOR) and activates degradation of proteins and organelles. The recycling of nutrients from breakdown of cellular components (macromolecules and organelles) contributes to the maintenance of the cellular ATP-regenerating capacity, to the control of protein and organellar quality, as well as to the maintenance of cardiomyocyte size and their survival. It is to note that slowing down protein synthesis also prevents accumulation of unfolded proteins under stress situation such as hypoxic or ischemic injury and the related endoplasmic reticulum stress (Terai et al. 2005).
Inflammation
As mentioned above, cytokines can directly regulate cardiac AMPK activity. On the other hand, AMPK has the capacity to repress inflammatory responses and exert anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects in a variety of cell types by interfering with cytokine signaling (Salminen et al. 2011; Salt and Palmer 2012). There is evidence that in several tissues, including the cardiovascular system, activation of AMPK impairs leukocyte infiltration (an early key step in development of inflammation) by reducing expression of chemokines and adhesion molecules (Salt and Palmer 2012). This is important for the heart, since inflammation is a critical component in the pathogenesis of many common cardiovascular diseases (Pankuweit et al. 2004), including the diabetic heart (Ko et al. 2009).
Cardioprotection
Most mechanisms triggered by active cardiac AMPK, though possibly not all, are recognized to promote cardioprotective effects. For example, AMPK-dependent stimulation of glucose metabolism (glucose uptake by GLUT4 and stimulated glycolysis by PFK2) is of particular importance for the anaerobic ATP synthesis during ischemia and thus for protection of the ischemic heart (Young 2008). It is to note, however, that AMPK activation persisting after ischemia during early reperfusion is considered rather detrimental, because excessive stimulation of fatty acid oxidation impairs glucose oxidation via Randle cycle/uncoupling of enhanced glycolysis from glucose oxidation (Dyck and Lopaschuk 2006). The net result of AMPK activation during an ischemia/reperfusion episode can still be considered as beneficial (Zaha and Young 2012). Finally, AMPK was suggested to mediate the cardiac response to different known cardiac protectants, mostly in pathological setting, as, e.g., during ischemic episodes or pathological hypertrophy (review in Kim et al. 2009). For example, AMPK contributes to the cardioprotective effects of adiponectin and metformin during coronary occlusion in mice (Calvert et al. 2008; Shibata et al. 2005), as well as to cardiac preconditioning by regulating the activity and recruitment of sarcolemmal K(ATP) channels (Sukhodub et al. 2007).
As AMPK activation has predominantly pro-survival character, it is considered as promising potential therapeutic target in the treatment of different cardiovascular diseases (Inoki et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2011; Zaha and Young 2012).
Cardiomyopathies
Mutation of specific CBS residues is associated with pathological disorders (Kemp 2004; Ignoul and Eggermont 2005). Mutations in the CBS domains of the AMPK γ2-subunit, expressed at particularly high levels in the heart, cause the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, a hereditary cardiomyopathy of varying severity, involving cardiac hypertrophy, contractile dysfunction, and arrhythmias. Mutations impair adenylate binding and thus AMPK activation (Scott et al. 2004; Burwinkel et al. 2005), but the major cause for the cardiomyopathy is the increased AMP-independent basal AMPK activity. This leads to higher glucose uptake, accumulation of glycogen in cardiac myocytes, and finally impairment of heart muscle development (Burwinkel et al. 2005; Davies et al. 2006).
Cardiac Contractility
Cardiac troponin I was identified in a yeast 2-hybrid screen to interact with the AMPK γ2-subunit N-terminal domain and to be phosphorylated by AMPK at Ser150 in vitro and during ischemia in the heart (Oliveira et al. 2012). This results in increased myocyte contraction and prolonged relaxation by an increase in myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity. These effects were also triggered by the AMPK activator AICAR, suggesting that pharmacological AMPK activation could improve heart function.
Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity
The anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin (Adriamycin; DXR) remains one of the most largely prescribed chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of a variety of human cancers (Eschenhagen et al. 2011; Ewer and Ewer 2010; Gianni et al. 2008; Minotti et al. 2004, 2010). It is still a cornerstone of combination therapies together with more targeted, new generation drugs. Unfortunately, the potent antitumor effect of DXR is accompanied by a number of unwanted side effects, in particular a serious cardiac toxicity. This complication represents a major obstacle when using the drug for prolonged time and/or at a higher cumulative dose (Curigliano et al. 2012; Menna et al. 2008). Detrimental effects of DXR are thought to be mediated by different kinds of stress induced by the drug: energetic stress, oxidative stress, and genotoxic stress (Gratia et al. 2012). Given the stress-sensing function of AMPK, an activation of the kinase is expected in the heart as a result of drug action. Paradoxically, it seems that in the heart DXR does not increase but rather decrease the basal phosphorylation of AMPK, thus inactivating the kinase. Such AMPK inhibition has been observed in different model systems of acute and chronic cardiotoxicity, including cultured cardiomyocytes (Konishi et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012a), perfused heart (Gratia et al. 2012; Tokarska-Schlattner et al. 2005), and in vivo models of rat (Cai et al. 2010; Gratia et al. 2012; Russell 2003) and mice (Kawaguchi et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2010; Konishi et al. 2011). AMPK appears to be an early and sensitive DXR target: in rat hearts perfused with rather low clinically relevant DXR concentrations, AMPK is inhibited already after 1–2 h, well before changes in myocardial function can be observed. In rats, AMPK inactivation persists several weeks after the end of treatment (Gratia et al. 2012; Konishi et al. 2011). Thus, it seems that DXR generates conditions which normally should activate AMPK but instead inhibits the stress response of AMPK. This may create a vicious cycle for the heart, important for drug toxicity.
DXR-induced inhibition of cardiac AMPK signaling is, at least partially, due to the negative cross talk with other signaling pathways, in particular Akt and ERK. These two pro-survival kinases respond in the heart to a variety of stimuli (Kehat and Molkentin 2010; Sussman et al. 2011) and are activated by DXR (Gabrielson et al. 2007; Gratia et al. 2012; Horie et al. 2010; Khalil et al. 2012; Kobayashi et al. 2010; Lee et al. 2006; Lou et al. 2005; Tokarska-Schlattner et al. 2010). Both kinases are known to inhibit AMPK (Du et al. 2008; Esteve-Puig et al. 2009; Hahn-Windgassen et al. 2005; Horman et al. 2006; Kovacic et al. 2003; Soltys et al. 2006).
This interplay of AMPK with Akt seems especially pronounced in heart, and AMPK inhibition by the Akt pathway has been also reported for other cardiac pathologies (Dyck and Lopaschuk 2006). We could substantiate the role of the Akt–AMPK cross talk for drug-induced AMPK inhibition by using the specific Akt inhibitor MK2206 (Gratia et al. 2012). Akt is mainly activated by DNA-damage signaling in response to strong DNA damage that is induced in cardiomyocytes by the drug. This involves DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), activated by DNA double-strand breaks which are a typical consequence of DXR action. Interestingly, several most recent studies indicate a more general relationship between a reduced LKB1–AMPK signaling and cardiac disease (Dolinsky et al. 2009; Ikeda et al. 2009; Shaw 2009). Decreased activation state of the LKB1–AMPK axis occurs in several cardiac pathologies, and in some of them a similar AMPK inhibition by cross talk with Akt has been suggested as underlying mechanism (Hahn-Windgassen et al. 2005; Horman et al. 2006; Kovacic et al. 2003; Soltys et al. 2006). In spontaneously hypertensive rats, another mechanism has been put forward, namely, oxidative damage of LKB1 due to formation of adducts between 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE, product of lipid peroxidation) and LKB1 which inhibits LKB1 and thus also AMPK activity (Dolinsky et al. 2009). Taken together, these data suggest that AMPK activation as a potential preventive or therapeutic strategy during DXR treatments.
10.7 Pharmacological Activation
AMPK controls metabolic pathways and cellular processes that are critical to the etiology of various, otherwise unrelated pathologies. For many of them, including cardiovascular disease, activation of AMPK has been recognized as a potential treatment, mimicking, for example, the positive effects of exercise on many of these pathologies. However, one has to keep in mind that systemic, constitutive AMPK activation by drugs also carries risks. These include, as already described above, a risk of cardiac pathologies as seen in the WPW syndrome and are due to the highly pleiotropic target spectrum of AMPK and in particular its central effects as, e.g., in hypothalamic appetite control.
A large panel of natural or synthetic agents were reported to activate AMPK (Yun and Ha 2011). However, the caveat with most of these molecules is that, where analyzed, they do not directly activate AMPK and have numerous cellular effects (Hardie 2014a). They often include mild inhibition of mitochondrial ATP generation by interfering with either the respiratory chain or mitochondrial ATPase (El-Mir et al. 2000; Gledhill et al. 2007), thus leading to a small but chronic increase in cellular AMP/ATP and ADP/ATP ratios. This group of compounds includes antidiabetic drugs like metformin and many plant polyphenols like resveratrol contained in grapes, green tea, peppers, garlic, or traditional products of Chinese medicine (Gu et al. 2010; Huang and Lin 2012; Kim et al. 2012c; Wang et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2012).
Also, some direct activators act via the allosteric mechanisms known for AMP. The long-known 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR; Giri et al. 2004) is metabolized within the cell to ZMP, an AMP analogue that binds to CBS domains and acts like AMP. However, such AMP analogues may affect any AMP-sensitive processes, a condition potentially avoided by the novel AMP analogue, 5-(5-hydroxyl-isoxazol-3-yl)-furan-2-phosphonic acid or C2. This compound was reported to be 1,000-fold more potent than ZMP in vitro (Gómez-Galeno et al. 2010). All these allosteric mechanisms involve the γ-subunit CBS sites, and activation is lost in cells expressing mutant AMPK insensitive to AMP (Hawley et al. 2010).
A third group of AMPK activators exerts its effects by binding to an entirely different site, situated at the interface of α-kinase domain and β-CBM domain. Its occupation confers protection of dephosphorylation and allosteric activation. Activators binding at this site include A-769662 (Scott et al. 2008), the 991 compound (Xiao et al. 2013) and its derivatives, as well as salicylate (Hawley et al. 2012).
As a result of almost 15 years of research, a total of 26 patents have been disclosed, describing 10 classes of direct AMPK activators (Giordanetto and Karis 2012). However, no direct AMPK activator has succeeded so far in clinical studies, although promising trials are ongoing (Ballantyne et al. 2013). Abbott Laboratories were the first in 2005 to identify thienopyridones as direct AMPK activators (Abbott Laboratories 2005). High-throughput screening first identified A-592107 that was then optimized to yield the more potent A-769662 (EC50: 0.8 μM) which did not show immediate signs of cytotoxicity or activity at secondary biological targets (Cool et al. 2006). Discovery of A-769662 represented a shift in AMPK-targeted pharmaceutical research, since it demonstrated that the kinase can be directly activated by non-nucleotide ligands. Since then, A-769662 has been used as a standard AMPK activator in basic research, and much has been learned about its action mechanism and pharmacology. A-769662 activates AMPK allosterically and by inhibition of Thr172 dephosphorylation mediated by PP2C, similar to AMP (Goransson et al. 2007; Sanders et al. 2007b). However, it does not bind to the γ-subunit CBS sites but to a novel allosteric regulatory site identified at the interface between the α-kinase and the β-CBM domain (Calabrese et al. 2014; Xiao et al. 2013). Importantly, A-769662 has a much stronger inhibitory effect on β1-containing complexes as compared to those containing β2. This showed for the first time that isoform-specific small molecule activators can be developed that would allow a more tissue-specific pharmacological modulation of AMPK activity.
Most recently, it was shown that AMP and A-769662 have a synergistic effect on AMPK activation (Scott et al. 2014; Ducommun et al. 2014) that even allows to bypass phosphorylation of Thr172, a step thought to be essential for AMPK activity (Scott et al. 2014; Viollet et al. 2014). This observation has put a note of caution onto the widespread use of Thr172 phosphorylation as a reliable readout for AMPK activity (Scott et al. 2014; Viollet et al. 2014). Although in the meantime also some off-target effects of A-769662 have been observed (Benziane et al. 2009; Treebak et al. 2009), the compound remains a very useful tool to explore AMPK-mediated cellular processes.
Most other direct AMPK activators that have been described bear structural similarities to A-769662, such as the 991 compound (Xiao et al. 2013). Only more recently, compounds that do not resemble to such thienopyridones have been described. For most patented direct AMPK activators, there is limited documentation available concerning their selectivity profile across the various AMPK isoform combinations (Giordanetto and Karis 2012; Yun and Ha 2011) apart from A-769662 (Scott et al. 2008; Goransson et al. 2007; Sanders et al. 2007b) and the 991 compound (Xiao et al. 2013). Given the plethora of processes controlled by AMPK, heterotrimer-specific AMPK activation would allow to preferentially target a specific tissue and thus has the strongest potential for pharmacological applications.
Taken together, very few structurally different AMPK activators are known so far (Giordanetto and Karis 2012; Yun and Ha 2011). Although this could represent a true limitation of potentially AMPK-activating compounds, it may also be related to the applied screening procedures. A critical point in screening chemical libraries may be the readout system used to identify AMPK activation. AMPK activators bind at allosteric sites, but the readout generally relies on the activity of the AMPK kinase domain. This implies the use of MgATP and accumulation of ADP and even traces of AMP during the assay. The presence of these nucleotides may obscure effects of activating compounds, at least of those acting at the CBS domains. Tools that report AMPK activation without the need of kinase assays would therefore have a clear advantage.
10.8 Concluding Remarks
Defects in cardiac energy metabolism contribute to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and heart failure. AMPK is now recognized as the central sensor and regulator of cellular energetics, and AMPK activation has been proposed as a suitable strategy for the treatment of insulin resistance/type II diabetes, cancer, and some other pathologies (Steinberg and Kemp 2009). However, the potential for pharmacological activation of AMPK in the heart has not yet been analyzed in much detail. For its application in cardiac pathologies, more work is still necessary to evaluate efficacy and safety in short-term and long-term activation protocols. There is continued interest of the pharmaceutical industry in developing AMPK agonists. Indeed, the search for clinically applicable, specific AMPK activators remains an urgent need to evaluate and fully exploit the pharmacological potential of AMPK.
References
Abbott Laboratories (2005) Preparation of substituted thieno[2,3-b]pyridones as activators for AMP-activated kinase for the treatment of diabetes and obesity. US20050038068
Allard MF, Parsons HL, Saeedi R, Wambolt RB, Brownsey R (2007) AMPK and metabolic adaptation by the heart to pressure overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292:H140–H148
Amodeo GA, Rudolph MJ, Tong L (2007) Crystal structure of the heterotrimer core of Saccharomyces cerevisiae AMPK homologue SNF1. Nature 449:492–495
Andersen MN, Rasmussen HB (2012) AMPK: a regulator of ion channels. Commun Integr Biol 5:480–484
Arad M, Seidman CE, Seidman JG (2007) AMP-activated protein kinase in the heart: role during health and disease. Circ Res 100:474–488
Atkinson DE (1968) The energy charge of the adenylate pool as a regulatory parameter. Interaction with feedback modifiers. Biochemistry (Mosc) 7:4030–4034
Ballantyne CM, Davidson MH, Macdougall DE, Bays HE, Dicarlo LA, Rosenberg NL, Margulies J, Newton RS (2013) Efficacy and safety of a novel dual modulator of adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:1154–1162
Banerjee RR, Rangwala SM, Shapiro JS, Rich AS, Rhoades B, Qi Y, Wang J, Rajala MW, Pocai A, Scherer PE et al (2004) Regulation of fasted blood glucose by resistin. Science 303:1195–1198
Barazzoni R, Bosutti A, Stebel M, Cattin MR, Roder E, Visintin L, Cattin L, Biolo G, Zanetti M, Guarnieri G (2005) Ghrelin regulates mitochondrial-lipid metabolism gene expression and tissue fat distribution in liver and skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288:E228–E235
Barnes K, Ingram JC, Porras OH, Barros LF, Hudson ER, Fryer LGD, Foufelle F, Carling D, Hardie DG, Baldwin SA (2002) Activation of GLUT1 by metabolic and osmotic stress: potential involvement of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). J Cell Sci 115:2433–2442
Bar-Peled L, Sabatini DM (2014) Regulation of mTORC1 by amino acids. Trends Cell Biol 24:400–406
Baskin KK, Taegtmeyer H (2011) An expanded role for AMP-activated protein kinase: regulator of myocardial protein degradation. Trends Cardiovasc Med 21:124–127
Bateman A (1997) The structure of a domain common to archaebacteria and the homocystinuria disease protein. Trends Biochem Sci 22:12–13
Beg ZH, Stonik JA, Brewer HB (1980) In vitro and in vivo phosphorylation of rat liver 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase and its modulation by glucagon. J Biol Chem 255:8541–8545
Behrends C, Sowa ME, Gygi SP, Harper JW (2010) Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature 466:68–76
Benziane B, Björnholm M, Lantier L, Viollet B, Zierath JR, Chibalin AV (2009) AMP-activated protein kinase activator A-769662 is an inhibitor of the Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 297:C1554–C1566
Bouhidel O, Pons S, Souktani R, Zini R, Berdeaux A, Ghaleh B (2008) Myocardial ischemic postconditioning against ischemia-reperfusion is impaired in ob/ob mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295:H1580–H1586
Bultot L, Guigas B, Von Wilamowitz‑Moellendorff A, Maisin L, Vertommen D, Hussain N, Beullens M, Guinovart JJ, Foretz M, Viollet B et al (2012) AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylates and inactivates liver glycogen synthase. Biochem J 443:193–203
Burwinkel B, Scott JW, Bührer C, van Landeghem FKH, Cox GF, Wilson CJ, Grahame Hardie D, Kilimann MW (2005) Fatal congenital heart glycogenosis caused by a recurrent activating R531Q mutation in the gamma 2-subunit of AMP-activated protein kinase (PRKAG2), not by phosphorylase kinase deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 76:1034–1049
Cai XJ, Chen L, Li L, Feng M, Li X, Zhang K, Rong YY, Hu XB, Zhang MX, Zhang Y et al (2010) Adiponectin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced adventitial fibroblast migration and transition to myofibroblasts via AdipoR1-AMPK-iNOS pathway. Mol Endocrinol 24:218–228
Calabrese MF, Rajamohan F, Harris MS, Caspers NL, Magyar R, Withka JM, Wang H, Borzilleri KA, Sahasrabudhe PV, Hoth LR et al (2014) Structural basis for AMPK activation: natural and synthetic ligands regulate kinase activity from opposite poles by different molecular mechanisms. Structure 1993(22):1161–1172
Calvert JW, Gundewar S, Jha S, Greer JJ, Bestermann WH, Tian R, Lefer DJ (2008) Acute metformin therapy confers cardioprotection against myocardial infarction via AMPK-eNOS-mediated signaling. Diabetes 57:696–705
Carey AL, Steinberg GR, Macaulay SL, Thomas WG, Holmes AG, Ramm G, Prelovsek O, Hohnen-Behrens C, Watt MJ, James DE et al (2006) Interleukin-6 increases insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in humans and glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation in vitro via AMP-activated protein kinase. Diabetes 55:2688–2697
Carling D (2004) The AMP-activated protein kinase cascade–a unifying system for energy control. Trends Biochem Sci 29:18–24
Chen Z-P, Stephens TJ, Murthy S, Canny BJ, Hargreaves M, Witters LA, Kemp BE, McConell GK (2003) Effect of exercise intensity on skeletal muscle AMPK signaling in humans. Diabetes 52:2205–2212
Chen L, Jiao Z-H, Zheng L-S, Zhang Y-Y, Xie S-T, Wang Z-X, Wu J-W (2009) Structural insight into the autoinhibition mechanism of AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature 459:1146–1149
Chen L, Wang J, Zhang Y-Y, Yan SF, Neumann D, Schlattner U, Wang Z-X, Wu J-W (2012) AMP-activated protein kinase undergoes nucleotide-dependent conformational changes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:716–718
Chen L, Xin F-J, Wang J, Hu J, Zhang Y-Y, Wan S, Cao L-S, Lu C, Li P, Yan SF et al (2013) Conserved regulatory elements in AMPK. Nature 498:E8–E10
Clark H, Carling D, Saggerson D (2004) Covalent activation of heart AMP-activated protein kinase in response to physiological concentrations of long-chain fatty acids. Eur J Biochem 271:2215–2224
Cool B, Zinker B, Chiou W, Kifle L, Cao N, Perham M, Dickinson R, Adler A, Gagne G, Iyengar R et al (2006) Identification and characterization of a small molecule AMPK activator that treats key components of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab 3:403–416
Coven DL, Hu X, Cong L, Bergeron R, Shulman GI, Hardie DG, Young LH (2003) Physiological role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the heart: graded activation during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 285:E629–E636
Crute BE, Seefeld K, Gamble J, Kemp BE, Witters LA (1998) Functional domains of the alpha1 catalytic subunit of the AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 273:35347–35354
Curigliano G, Cardinale D, Suter T, Plataniotis G, de Azambuja E, Sandri MT, Criscitiello C, Goldhirsch A, Cipolla C, Roila F et al (2012) Cardiovascular toxicity induced by chemotherapy, targeted agents and radiotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 23(7):vii155–vii166
Davies SP, Helps NR, Cohen PT, Hardie DG (1995) 5′-AMP inhibits dephosphorylation, as well as promoting phosphorylation, of the AMP-activated protein kinase. Studies using bacterially expressed human protein phosphatase-2C alpha and native bovine protein phosphatase-2AC. FEBS Lett 377:421–425
Davies JK, Wells DJ, Liu K, Whitrow HR, Daniel TD, Grignani R, Lygate CA, Schneider JE, Noel G, Watkins H et al (2006) Characterization of the role of gamma2 R531G mutation in AMP-activated protein kinase in cardiac hypertrophy and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290:H1942–H1951
D’Eon TM, Souza SC, Aronovitz M, Obin MS, Fried SK, Greenberg AS (2005) Estrogen regulation of adiposity and fuel partitioning. Evidence of genomic and non-genomic regulation of lipogenic and oxidative pathways. J Biol Chem 280:35983–35991
Djouder N, Tuerk RD, Suter M, Salvioni P, Thali RF, Scholz R, Vaahtomeri K, Auchli Y, Rechsteiner H, Brunisholz RA et al (2010) PKA phosphorylates and inactivates AMPKalpha to promote efficient lipolysis. EMBO J 29:469–481
Dolinsky VW, Chan AY, Robillard Frayne I, Light PE, Des Rosiers C, Dyck JR (2009) Resveratrol prevents the prohypertrophic effects of oxidative stress on LKB1. Circulation 119:1643–1652
Du J, Guan T, Zhang H, Xia Y, Liu F, Zhang Y (2008) Inhibitory crosstalk between ERK and AMPK in the growth and proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 368:402–407
Ducommun S, Ford RJ, Bultot L, Deak M, Bertrand L, Kemp BE, Steinberg GR, Sakamoto K (2014) Enhanced activation of cellular AMPK by dual-small molecule treatment: AICAR and A769662. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 306:E688–E696
Dyck JR, Lopaschuk GD (2006) AMPK alterations in cardiac physiology and pathology: enemy or ally? J Physiol 574:95–112
El-Mir MY, Nogueira V, Fontaine E, Avéret N, Rigoulet M, Leverve X (2000) Dimethylbiguanide inhibits cell respiration via an indirect effect targeted on the respiratory chain complex I. J Biol Chem 275:223–228
Eschenhagen T, Force T, Ewer MS, de Keulenaer GW, Suter TM, Anker SD, Avkiran M, de Azambuja E, Balligand J-L, Brutsaert DL et al (2011) Cardiovascular side effects of cancer therapies: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 13:1–10
Esteve-Puig R, Canals F, Colome N, Merlino G, Recio JA (2009) Uncoupling of the LKB1-AMPKalpha energy sensor pathway by growth factors and oncogenic BRAF. PLoS One 4:e4771
Ewer MS, Ewer SM (2010) Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments: what the cardiologist needs to know. Nat Rev Cardiol 7:564–575
Ferrer A, Caelles C, Massot N, Hegardt FG (1985) Activation of rat liver cytosolic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A reductase kinase by adenosine 5′-monophosphate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 132:497–504
Fogarty S, Hawley SA, Green KA, Saner N, Mustard KJ, Hardie DG (2010) Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta activates AMPK without forming a stable complex: synergistic effects of Ca2+ and AMP. Biochem J 426:109–118
Forcet C, Billaud M (2007) Dialogue between LKB1 and AMPK: a hot topic at the cellular pole. Sci STKE 2007:pe51
Frederich M, Zhang L, Balschi JA (2005) Hypoxia and AMP independently regulate AMP-activated protein kinase activity in heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H2412–H2421
Gabrielson K, Bedja D, Pin S, Tsao A, Gama L, Yuan B, Muratore N (2007) Heat shock protein 90 and ErbB2 in the cardiac response to doxorubicin injury. Cancer Res 67:1436–1441
Garcia-Haro L, Garcia-Gimeno MA, Neumann D, Beullens M, Bollen M, Sanz P (2010) The PP1-R6 protein phosphatase holoenzyme is involved in the glucose-induced dephosphorylation and inactivation of AMP-activated protein kinase, a key regulator of insulin secretion, in MIN6 beta cells. FASEB J 24:5080–5091
Gianni L, Herman EH, Lipshultz SE, Minotti G, Sarvazyan N, Sawyer DB (2008) Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: from bench to bedside. J Clin Oncol 26:3777–3784
Giordanetto F, Karis D (2012) Direct AMP-activated protein kinase activators: a review of evidence from the patent literature. Expert Opin Ther Pat 22:1467–1477
Giri S, Nath N, Smith B, Viollet B, Singh AK, Singh I (2004) 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-4-ribofuranoside inhibits proinflammatory response in glial cells: a possible role of AMP-activated protein kinase. J Neurosci 24:479–487
Gledhill JR, Montgomery MG, Leslie AGW, Walker JE (2007) Mechanism of inhibition of bovine F1-ATPase by resveratrol and related polyphenols. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:13632–13637
Gómez-Galeno JE, Dang Q, Nguyen TH, Boyer SH, Grote MP, Sun Z, Chen M, Craigo WA, van Poelje PD, MacKenna DA et al (2010) A potent and selective AMPK activator that inhibits de novo lipogenesis. ACS Med Chem Lett 1:478–482
Goransson O, McBride A, Hawley SA, Ross FA, Shpiro N, Foretz M, Viollet B, Hardie DG, Sakamoto K (2007) Mechanism of action of A-769662, a valuable tool for activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 282:32549–32560
Gowans GJ, Hawley SA, Ross FA, Hardie DG (2013) AMP is a true physiological regulator of AMP-activated protein kinase by both allosteric activation and enhancing net phosphorylation. Cell Metab 18:556–566
Gratia S, Kay L, Potenza L, Seffouh A, Novel-Chate V, Schnebelen C, Sestili P, Schlattner U, Tokarska-Schlattner M (2012) Inhibition of AMPK signalling by doxorubicin: at the crossroads of the cardiac responses to energetic, oxidative, and genotoxic stress. Cardiovasc Res 95:290–299
Gu Y, Zhang Y, Shi X, Li X, Hong J, Chen J, Gu W, Lu X, Xu G, Ning G (2010) Effect of traditional Chinese medicine berberine on type 2 diabetes based on comprehensive metabonomics. Talanta 81:766–772
Gwinn DM, Shackelford DB, Egan DF, Mihaylova MM, Mery A, Vasquez DS, Turk BE, Shaw RJ (2008) AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol Cell 30:214–226
Hahn-Windgassen A, Nogueira V, Chen CC, Skeen JE, Sonenberg N, Hay N (2005) Akt activates the mammalian target of rapamycin by regulating cellular ATP level and AMPK activity. J Biol Chem 280:32081–32089
Han Y, Wang Q, Song P, Zhu Y, Zou M-H (2010) Redox regulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase. PLoS One 5:e15420
Hanks SK, Quinn AM, Hunter T (1988) The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. Science 241:42–52
Hardie DG (2007) AMP-activated/SNF1 protein kinases: conserved guardians of cellular energy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:774–785
Hardie DG (2008a) AMPK: a key regulator of energy balance in the single cell and the whole organism. Int J Obes 32:S7–S12
Hardie DG (2008b) Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the metabolic syndrome and in heart disease. FEBS Lett 582:81–89
Hardie DG (2011) AMP-activated protein kinase: an energy sensor that regulates all aspects of cell function. Genes Dev 25:1895–1908
Hardie DG (2014a) AMP-activated protein kinase: maintaining energy homeostasis at the cellular and whole-body levels. Annu Rev Nutr 34:31–55
Hardie DG (2014b) AMPK: positive and negative regulation, and its role in whole-body energy homeostasis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 33C:1–7
Hardie DG (2014c) AMPK—sensing energy while talking to other signaling pathways. Cell Metab 20:939–952
Hardie DG, Ashford MLJ (2014) AMPK: regulating energy balance at the cellular and whole body levels. Physiology 29:99–107
Hardie DG, Carling D (1997) The AMP-activated protein kinase–fuel gauge of the mammalian cell? Eur J Biochem 246:259–273
Hardie DG, Hawley SA (2001) AMP-activated protein kinase: the energy charge hypothesis revisited. BioEssays News Rev Mol Cell Dev Biol 23:1112–1119
Hardie DG, Sakamoto K (2006) AMPK: a key sensor of fuel and energy status in skeletal muscle. Physiology (Bethesda) 21:48–60
Hardie DG, Salt IP, Hawley SA, Davies SP (1999) AMP-activated protein kinase: an ultrasensitive system for monitoring cellular energy charge. Biochem J 338(Pt 3):717–722
Hardie DG, Scott JW, Pan DA, Hudson ER (2003) Management of cellular energy by the AMP-activated protein kinase system. FEBS Lett 546:113–120
Hardie DG, Carling D, Gamblin SJ (2011) AMP-activated protein kinase: also regulated by ADP? Trends Biochem Sci 36:470–477
Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA (2012a) AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13:251–262
Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA (2012b) AMP-activated protein kinase: a target for drugs both ancient and modern. Chem Biol 19:1222–1236
Haruta T, Uno T, Kawahara J, Takano A, Egawa K, Sharma PM, Olefsky JM, Kobayashi M (2000) A rapamycin-sensitive pathway down-regulates insulin signaling via phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation of insulin receptor substrate-1. Mol Endocrinol (Baltimore, MD) 14:783–794
Hawley SA, Davison M, Woods A, Davies SP, Beri RK, Carling D, Hardie DG (1996) Characterization of the AMP-activated protein kinase kinase from rat liver and identification of threonine 172 as the major site at which it phosphorylates AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 271:27879–27887
Hawley SA, Boudeau J, Reid JL, Mustard KJ, Udd L, Makela TP, Alessi DR, Hardie DG (2003) Complexes between the LKB1 tumor suppressor, STRAD alpha/beta and MO25 alpha/beta are upstream kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. J Biol 2:28
Hawley SA, Pan DA, Mustard KJ, Ross L, Bain J, Edelman AM, Frenguelli BG, Hardie DG (2005) Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-beta is an alternative upstream kinase for AMP-activated protein kinase. Cell Metab 2:9–19
Hawley SA, Ross FA, Chevtzoff C, Green KA, Evans A, Fogarty S, Towler MC, Brown LJ, Ogunbayo OA, Evans AM et al (2010) Use of cells expressing gamma subunit variants to identify diverse mechanisms of AMPK activation. Cell Metab 11:554–565
Hawley SA, Fullerton MD, Ross FA, Schertzer JD, Chevtzoff C, Walker KJ, Peggie MW, Zibrova D, Green KA, Mustard KJ et al (2012) The ancient drug salicylate directly activates AMP-activated protein kinase. Science 336:918–922
Hawley SA, Ross FA, Gowans GJ, Tibarewal P, Leslie NR, Hardie DG (2014) Phosphorylation by Akt within the ST loop of AMPK-alpha1 down-regulates its activation in tumour cells. Biochem J 459:275–287
Herrero‐Martín G, Høyer‐Hansen M, García‐García C, Fumarola C, Farkas T, López‐Rivas A, Jäättelä M (2009) TAK1 activates AMPK‐dependent cytoprotective autophagy in TRAIL‐treated epithelial cells. EMBO J 28:677–685
Horie T, Ono K, Nishi H, Nagao K, Kinoshita M, Watanabe S, Kuwabara Y, Nakashima Y, Takanabe-Mori R, Nishi E et al (2010) Acute doxorubicin cardiotoxicity is associated with miR-146a-induced inhibition of the neuregulin-ErbB pathway. Cardiovasc Res 87:656–664
Horman S, Vertommen D, Heath R, Neumann D, Mouton V, Woods A, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Carling D, Hue L et al (2006) Insulin antagonizes ischemia-induced Thr172 phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase alpha-subunits in heart via hierarchical phosphorylation of Ser485/491. J Biol Chem 281:5335–5340
Houde VP, Ritorto MS, Gourlay R, Varghese J, Davies P, Shpiro N, Sakamoto K, Alessi DR (2014) Investigation of LKB1 Ser431 phosphorylation and Cys433 farnesylation using mouse knockin analysis reveals an unexpected role of prenylation in regulating AMPK activity. Biochem J 458:41–56
Hu X, Xu X, Lu Z, Zhang P, Fassett J, Zhang Y, Xin Y, Hall JL, Viollet B, Bache RJ et al (2011) AMP activated protein kinase-alpha2 regulates expression of estrogen-related receptor-alpha, a metabolic transcription factor related to heart failure development. Hypertension 58:696–703
Huang HC, Lin JK (2012) Pu-erh tea, green tea, and black tea suppresses hyperlipidemia, hyperleptinemia and fatty acid synthase through activating AMPK in rats fed a high-fructose diet. Food Funct 3:170–177
Hurley RL, Anderson KA, Franzone JM, Kemp BE, Means AR, Witters LA (2005) The Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinases are AMP-activated protein kinase kinases. J Biol Chem 280:29060–29066
Hurley RL, Barré LK, Wood SD, Anderson KA, Kemp BE, Means AR, Witters LA (2006) Regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase by multisite phosphorylation in response to agents that elevate cellular cAMP. J Biol Chem 281:36662–36672
Ignoul S, Eggermont J (2005) CBS domains: structure, function, and pathology in human proteins. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289:C1369–C1378
Ikeda Y, Sato K, Pimentel DR, Sam F, Shaw RJ, Dyck JR, Walsh K (2009) Cardiac-specific deletion of LKB1 leads to hypertrophy and dysfunction. J Biol Chem 284:35839–35849
Inoki K, Li Y, Xu T, Guan K-L (2003) Rheb GTPase is a direct target of TSC2 GAP activity and regulates mTOR signaling. Genes Dev 17:1829–1834
Inoki K, Kim J, Guan K-L (2012) AMPK and mTOR in cellular energy homeostasis and drug targets. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 52:381–400
Jeon S-M, Chandel NS, Hay N (2012) AMPK regulates NADPH homeostasis to promote tumour cell survival during energy stress. Nature 485:661–665
Kahn BB, Alquier T, Carling D, Hardie DG (2005) AMP-activated protein kinase: ancient energy gauge provides clues to modern understanding of metabolism. Cell Metab 1:15–25
Kang S, Chemaly ER, Hajjar RJ, Lebeche D (2011) Resistin promotes cardiac hypertrophy via the AMP-activated protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (AMPK/mTOR) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase/insulin receptor substrate 1 (JNK/IRS1) pathways. J Biol Chem 286:18465–18473
Kawaguchi T, Takemura G, Kanamori H, Takeyama T, Watanabe T, Morishita K, Ogino A, Tsujimoto A, Goto K, Maruyama R et al (2012) Prior starvation mitigates acute doxorubicin cardiotoxicity through restoration of autophagy in affected cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res 96:456–465
Kazgan N, Williams T, Forsberg LJ, Brenman JE (2010) Identification of a nuclear export signal in the catalytic subunit of AMP-activated protein kinase. Mol Biol Cell 21:3433–3442
Kehat I, Molkentin JD (2010) Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) signaling in cardiac hypertrophy. Ann NY Acad Sci 1188:96–102
Kelly M, Keller C, Avilucea PR, Keller P, Luo Z, Xiang X, Giralt M, Hidalgo J, Saha AK, Pedersen BK et al (2004) AMPK activity is diminished in tissues of IL-6 knockout mice: the effect of exercise. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 320:449–454
Kemp BE (2004) Bateman domains and adenosine derivatives form a binding contract. J Clin Invest 113:182–184
Kerrien S, Aranda B, Breuza L, Bridge A, Broackes-Carter F, Chen C, Duesbury M, Dumousseau M, Feuermann M, Hinz U et al (2012) The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D841–D846
Khalil H, Peltzer N, Walicki J, Yang J-Y, Dubuis G, Gardiol N, Held W, Bigliardi P, Marsland B, Liaudet L et al (2012) Caspase-3 protects stressed organs against cell death. Mol Cell Biol 32:4523–4533
Kim TT, Dyck JRB (2015) Is AMPK the savior of the failing heart? Trends Endocrinol Metab 26(1):40–48
Kim AS, Miller EJ, Young LH (2009) AMP-activated protein kinase: a core signalling pathway in the heart. Acta Physiol 196:37–53
Kim M-J, Jeon DS, Shin DI, Lee MY (2010) Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in cardioprotection in doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy of mice. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:A31.E294
Kim AS, Miller EJ, Wright TM, Li J, Qi D, Atsina K, Zaha V, Sakamoto K, Young LH (2011) A small molecule AMPK activator protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol 51:24–32
Kim M, Shen M, Ngoy S, Karamanlidis G, Liao R, Tian R (2012a) AMPK isoform expression in the normal and failing hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol 52:1066–1073
Kim SY, Jeong S, Jung E, Baik K-H, Chang MH, Kim SA, Shim J-H, Chun E, Lee K-Y (2012b) AMP-activated protein kinase-α1 as an activating kinase of TGF-β-activated kinase 1 has a key role in inflammatory signals. Cell Death Dis 3:e357
Kim EJ, Lee DH, Kim HJ, Lee SJ, Ban JO, Cho MC, Jeong HS, Yang Y, Hong JT, Yoon do Y (2012c) Thiacremonone, a sulfur compound isolated from garlic, attenuates lipid accumulation partially mediated via AMPK activation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J Nutr Biochem 23:1552–1558
Klaus A, Polge C, Zorman S, Auchli Y, Brunisholz R, Schlattner U (2012) A two-dimensional screen for AMPK substrates identifies tumor suppressor fumarate hydratase as a preferential AMPKα2 substrate. J Proteomics 75:3304–3313
Klaus A, Zorman S, Berthier A, Polge C, Ramirez S, Michelland S, Sève M, Vertommen D, Rider M, Lentze N et al (2013) Glutathione S-transferases interact with AMP-activated protein kinase: evidence for S-glutathionylation and activation in vitro. PLoS One 8:e62497
Ko HJ, Zhang Z, Jung DY, Jun JY, Ma Z, Jones KE, Chan SY, Kim JK (2009) Nutrient stress activates inflammation and reduces glucose metabolism by suppressing AMP-activated protein kinase in the heart. Diabetes 58:2536–2546
Kobayashi S, Volden P, Timm D, Mao K, Xu X, Liang Q (2010) Transcription factor GATA4 inhibits doxorubicin-induced autophagy and cardiomyocyte death. J Biol Chem 285:793–804
Kola B, Hubina E, Tucci SA, Kirkham TC, Garcia EA, Mitchell SE, Williams LM, Hawley SA, Hardie DG, Grossman AB et al (2005) Cannabinoids and ghrelin have both central and peripheral metabolic and cardiac effects via AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 280:25196–25201
Konishi M, Haraguchi G, Ohigashi H, Ishihara T, Saito K, Nakano Y, Isobe M (2011) Adiponectin protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy by anti-apoptotic effects through AMPK up-regulation. Cardiovasc Res 89:309–319
Kovacic S, Soltys CL, Barr AJ, Shiojima I, Walsh K, Dyck JR (2003) Akt activity negatively regulates phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase in the heart. J Biol Chem 278:39422–39427
Kubli DA, Gustafsson AB (2014) Cardiomyocyte health: adapting to metabolic changes through autophagy. Trends Endocrinol Metab 25:156–164
Kubota N, Yano W, Kubota T, Yamauchi T, Itoh S, Kumagai H, Kozono H, Takamoto I, Okamoto S, Shiuchi T et al (2007) Adiponectin stimulates AMP-activated protein kinase in the hypothalamus and increases food intake. Cell Metab 6:55–68
Kudo N, Barr AJ, Barr RL, Desai S, Lopaschuk GD (1995) High rates of fatty acid oxidation during reperfusion of ischemic hearts are associated with a decrease in malonyl-CoA levels due to an increase in 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase. J Biol Chem 270:17513–17520
Kudo N, Gillespie JG, Kung L, Witters LA, Schulz R, Clanachan AS, Lopaschuk GD (1996) Characterization of 5′AMP-activated protein kinase activity in the heart and its role in inhibiting acetyl-CoA carboxylase during reperfusion following ischemia. Biochim Biophys Acta 1301:67–75
Kulkarni SS, Karlsson HKR, Szekeres F, Chibalin AV, Krook A, Zierath JR (2011) Suppression of 5′-nucleotidase enzymes promotes AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation and metabolism in human and mouse skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem 286:34567–34574
Kurth-Kraczek EJ, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ, Winder WW (1999) 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase activation causes GLUT4 translocation in skeletal muscle. Diabetes 48:1667–1671
Lantier L, Fentz J, Mounier R, Leclerc J, Treebak JT, Pehmøller C, Sanz N, Sakakibara I, Saint-Amand E, Rimbaud S et al (2014) AMPK controls exercise endurance, mitochondrial oxidative capacity, and skeletal muscle integrity. FASEB J 28(7):3211–3224
Lee E-R, Kim J-Y, Kang Y-J, Ahn J-Y, Kim J-H, Kim B-W, Choi H-Y, Jeong M-Y, Cho S-G (2006) Interplay between PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling pathways in DNA-damaging drug-induced apoptosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763:958–968
Li J, Miller EJ, Ninomiya-Tsuji J, Russell RR, Young LH (2005) AMP-activated protein kinase activates p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase by increasing recruitment of p38 MAPK to TAB1 in the ischemic heart. Circ Res 97:872–879
Li HL, Yin R, Chen D, Liu D, Wang D, Yang Q, Dong YG (2007) Long-term activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase attenuates pressure-overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy. J Cell Biochem 100:1086–1099
Li X, Wang L, Zhou XE, Ke J, de Waal PW, Gu X, Tan MHE, Wang D, Wu D, Xu HE et al (2014) Structural basis of AMPK regulation by adenine nucleotides and glycogen. Cell Res. doi:10.1038/cr.2014.150
Liao C-C, Ou T-T, Huang H-P, Wang C-J (2014) The inhibition of oleic acid induced hepatic lipogenesis and the promotion of lipolysis by caffeic acid via up-regulation of AMP-activated kinase. J Sci Food Agric 94:1154–1162
Loewith R, Jacinto E, Wullschleger S, Lorberg A, Crespo JL, Bonenfant D, Oppliger W, Jenoe P, Hall MN (2002) Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Mol Cell 10:457–468
Lou H, Danelisen I, Singal PK (2005) Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinases in adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H1925–H1930
Luiken JJ, Coort SL, Willems J, Coumans WA, Bonen A, van der Vusse GJ, Glatz JF (2003) Contraction-induced fatty acid translocase/CD36 translocation in rat cardiac myocytes is mediated through AMP-activated protein kinase signaling. Diabetes 52:1627–1634
Ma H, Wang J, Thomas DP, Tong C, Leng L, Wang W, Merk M, Zierow S, Bernhagen J, Ren J et al (2010) Impaired macrophage migration inhibitory factor-AMP-activated protein kinase activation and ischemic recovery in the senescent heart. Circulation 122:282–292
Mahlapuu M, Johansson C, Lindgren K, Hjalm G, Barnes BR, Krook A, Zierath JR, Andersson L, Marklund S (2004) Expression profiling of the gamma-subunit isoforms of AMP-activated protein kinase suggests a major role for gamma3 in white skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286:E194–E200
Makinde AO, Gamble J, Lopaschuk GD (1997) Upregulation of 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase is responsible for the increase in myocardial fatty acid oxidation rates following birth in the newborn rabbit. Circ Res 80:482–489
Marsin A-S, Bertrand L, Rider MH, Deprez J, Beauloye C, Vincent MF, Van der Berghe G, Carling D, Hue L (2000) Phosphorylation and activation of heart PFK-2 by AMPK has a role in the stimulation of glycolysis during ischaemia. Curr Biol 10:1247–1255
Marsin A-S, Bouzin C, Bertrand L, Hue L (2002) The stimulation of glycolysis by hypoxia in activated monocytes is mediated by AMP-activated protein kinase and inducible 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase. J Biol Chem 277:30778–30783
McBride A, Ghilagaber S, Nikolaev A, Hardie DG (2009) The glycogen-binding domain on the AMPK beta subunit allows the kinase to act as a glycogen sensor. Cell Metab 9:23–34
McGaffin KR, Moravec CS, McTiernan CF (2009) Leptin signaling in the failing and mechanically unloaded human heart. Circ Heart Fail 2:676–683
McGee SL, Howlett KF, Starkie RL, Cameron-Smith D, Kemp BE, Hargreaves M (2003) Exercise increases nuclear AMPK α2 in human skeletal muscle. Diabetes 52:926–928
McGee SL, van Denderen BJW, Howlett KF, Mollica J, Schertzer JD, Kemp BE, Hargreaves M (2008) AMP-activated protein kinase regulates GLUT4 transcription by phosphorylating histone deacetylase 5. Diabetes 57:860–867
McInnes KJ, Brown KA, Hunger NI, Simpson ER (2012) Regulation of LKB1 expression by sex hormones in adipocytes. Int J Obes 36:982–985
Menna P, Salvatorelli E, Gianni L, Minotti G (2008) Anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Top Curr Chem 283:21–44
Mihaylova MM, Shaw RJ (2011) The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat Cell Biol 13:1016–1023
Miller EJ, Li J, Leng L, McDonald C, Atsumi T, Bucala R, Young LH (2008) Macrophage migration inhibitory factor stimulates AMP-activated protein kinase in the ischaemic heart. Nature 451:578–582
Minokoshi Y, Kim Y-B, Peroni OD, Fryer LGD, Müller C, Carling D, Kahn BB (2002) Leptin stimulates fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature 415:339–343
Minokoshi Y, Alquier T, Furukawa N, Kim Y-B, Lee A, Xue B, Mu J, Foufelle F, Ferré P, Birnbaum MJ et al (2004) AMP-kinase regulates food intake by responding to hormonal and nutrient signals in the hypothalamus. Nature 428:569–574
Minotti G, Menna P, Salvatorelli E, Cairo G, Gianni L (2004) Anthracyclines: molecular advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity. Pharmacol Rev 56:185–229
Minotti G, Salvatorelli E, Menna P (2010) Pharmacological foundations of cardio-oncology. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 334:2–8
Moreno D, Towler MC, Hardie DG, Knecht E, Sanz P (2010) The laforin-malin complex, involved in Lafora disease, promotes the incorporation of K63-linked ubiquitin chains into AMP-activated protein kinase beta subunits. Mol Biol Cell 21:2578–2588
Morrison A, Yan X, Tong C, Li J (2011) Acute rosiglitazone treatment is cardioprotective against ischemia-reperfusion injury by modulating AMPK, Akt, and JNK signaling in nondiabetic mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301:H895–H902
Mungai PT, Waypa GB, Jairaman A, Prakriya M, Dokic D, Ball MK, Schumacker PT (2011) Hypoxia triggers AMPK activation through reactive oxygen species-mediated activation of calcium release-activated calcium channels. Mol Cell Biol 31:3531–3545
Musi N, Hirshman MF, Nygren J, Svanfeldt M, Bavenholm P, Rooyackers O, Zhou G, Williamson JM, Ljunqvist O, Efendic S et al (2002) Metformin increases AMP-activated protein kinase activity in skeletal muscle of subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 51:2074–2081
Musi N, Hirshman MF, Arad M, Xing Y, Fujii N, Pomerleau J, Ahmad F, Berul CI, Seidman JG, Tian R et al (2005) Functional role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the heart during exercise. FEBS Lett 579:2045–2050
Nagata D, Takeda R, Sata M, Satonaka H, Suzuki E, Nagano T, Hirata Y (2004) AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits angiotensin II-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circulation 110:444–451
Nakano A, Takashima S (2012) LKB1 and AMP-activated protein kinase: regulators of cell polarity. Genes Cells 17:737–747
Nakazato M, Murakami N, Date Y, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, Matsukura S (2001) A role for ghrelin in the central regulation of feeding. Nature 409:194–198
Neumann D, Suter M, Tuerk R, Riek U, Wallimann T (2007) Co-expression of LKB1, MO25alpha and STRADalpha in bacteria yield the functional and active heterotrimeric complex. Mol Biotechnol 36:220–231
Nojima H, Tokunaga C, Eguchi S, Oshiro N, Hidayat S, Yoshino K, Hara K, Tanaka N, Avruch J, Yonezawa K (2003) The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) partner, raptor, binds the mTOR substrates p70 S6 kinase and 4E-BP1 through their TOR signaling (TOS) motif. J Biol Chem 278:15461–15464
Oakhill JS, Chen Z-P, Scott JW, Steel R, Castelli LA, Ling N, Macaulay SL, Kemp BE (2010) β-Subunit myristoylation is the gatekeeper for initiating metabolic stress sensing by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:19237–19241
Oakhill JS, Steel R, Chen Z-P, Scott JW, Ling N, Tam S, Kemp BE (2011) AMPK is a direct adenylate charge-regulated protein kinase. Science 332:1433–1435
Oliveira SM, Zhang YH, Solis RS, Isackson H, Bellahcene M, Yavari A, Pinter K, Davies JK, Ge Y, Ashrafian H et al (2012) AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylates cardiac troponin I and alters contractility of murine ventricular myocytes. Circ Res 110:1192–1201
O’Neill HM, Maarbjerg SJ, Crane JD, Jeppesen J, Jørgensen SB, Schertzer JD, Shyroka O, Kiens B, van Denderen BJ, Tarnopolsky MA et al (2011) AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) beta1beta2 muscle null mice reveal an essential role for AMPK in maintaining mitochondrial content and glucose uptake during exercise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:16092–16097
O’Neill HM, Holloway GP, Steinberg GR (2013) AMPK regulation of fatty acid metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis: implications for obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 366:135–151
Paiva MA, Rutter-Locher Z, Goncalves LM, Providencia LA, Davidson SM, Yellon DM, Mocanu MM (2011) Enhancing AMPK activation during ischemia protects the diabetic heart against reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 300:H2123–H2134
Pang T, Xiong B, Li J-Y, Qiu B-Y, Jin G-Z, Shen J-K, Li J (2007) Conserved α-helix acts as autoinhibitory sequence in AMP-activated protein kinase α subunits. J Biol Chem 282:495–506
Pankuweit S, Ruppert V, Maisch B (2004) Inflammation in dilated cardiomyopathy. Herz 29:788–793
Park S, Scheffler TL, Rossie SS, Gerrard DE (2013) AMPK activity is regulated by calcium-mediated protein phosphatase 2A activity. Cell Calcium 53:217–223
Patten IS, Arany Z (2012) PGC-1 coactivators in the cardiovascular system. Trends Endocrinol Metab 23:90–97
Pinter K, Grignani RT, Czibik G, Farza H, Watkins H, Redwood C (2012) Embryonic expression of AMPK γ subunits and the identification of a novel γ2 transcript variant in adult heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 53:342–349
Polekhina G, Gupta A, van Denderen BJW, Feil SC, Kemp BE, Stapleton D, Parker MW (2005) Structural basis for glycogen recognition by AMP-activated protein kinase. Structure 1993(13):1453–1462
Polge C, Jossier M, Crozet P, Gissot L, Thomas M (2008) Beta-subunits of the SnRK1 complexes share a common ancestral function together with expression and function specificities; physical interaction with nitrate reductase specifically occurs via AKINbeta1-subunit. Plant Physiol 148:1570–1582
Qi J, Gong J, Zhao T, Zhao J, Lam P, Ye J, Li JZ, Wu J, Zhou H-M, Li P (2008) Downregulation of AMP-activated protein kinase by Cidea-mediated ubiquitination and degradation in brown adipose tissue. EMBO J 27:1537–1548
Quentin T, Kitz J, Steinmetz M, Poppe A, Bar K, Kratzner R (2011) Different expression of the catalytic alpha subunits of the AMP activated protein kinase–an immunohistochemical study in human tissue. Histol Histopathol 26:589–596
Ramírez Ríos S, Lamarche F, Cottet-Rousselle C, Klaus A, Tuerk R, Thali R, Auchli Y, Brunisholz R, Neumann D, Barret L, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Schlattner U (2014) Regulation of brain-type creatine kinase by AMP-activated protein kinase: interaction, phosphorylation and ER localization. Biochim Biophys Acta 1837:1271–1283
Riek U, Scholz R, Konarev P, Rufer A, Suter M, Nazabal A, Ringler P, Chami M, Muller SA, Neumann D et al (2008) Structural properties of AMP-activated protein kinase: dimerization, molecular shape, and changes upon ligand binding. J Biol Chem 283:18331–18343
Ronnebaum SM, Patterson C (2010) The FoxO family in cardiac function and dysfunction. Annu Rev Physiol 72:81–94
Ronnebaum SM, Patterson C, Schisler JC (2014) Hey U(PS): metabolic and proteolytic homeostasis linked via AMPK and the ubiquitin proteasome system. Mol Endocrinol 28(10):1602–1615
Rubio T, Vernia S, Sanz P (2013) Sumoylation of AMPKbeta2 subunit enhances AMP-activated protein kinase activity. Mol Biol Cell 24:1801–1811, S1–S4
Russell R III (2003) The role of AMP-activated protein kinase in fuel selection by the stressed heart. Curr Hypertens Rep 5:459–465
Russell RR III, Li J, Coven DL, Pypaert M, Zechner C, Palmeri M, Giordano FJ, Mu J, Birnbaum MJ, Young LH (2004) AMP-activated protein kinase mediates ischemic glucose uptake and prevents postischemic cardiac dysfunction, apoptosis, and injury. J Clin Invest 114:495–503
Saks V, Favier R, Guzun R, Schlattner U, Wallimann T (2006) Molecular system bioenergetics: regulation of substrate supply in response to heart energy demands. J Physiol 577:769–777
Salminen A, Hyttinen JM, Kaarniranta K (2011) AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits NF-kappaB signaling and inflammation: impact on healthspan and lifespan. J Mol Med (Berlin) 89:667–676
Salt IP, Palmer TM (2012) Exploiting the anti-inflammatory effects of AMP-activated protein kinase activation. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 21:1155–1167
Salt I, Celler JW, Hawley SA, Prescott A, Woods A, Carling D, Hardie DG (1998a) AMP-activated protein kinase: greater AMP dependence, and preferential nuclear localization, of complexes containing the alpha2 isoform. Biochem J 334(Pt 1):177–187
Salt IP, Johnson G, Ashcroft SJ, Hardie DG (1998b) AMP-activated protein kinase is activated by low glucose in cell lines derived from pancreatic beta cells, and may regulate insulin release. Biochem J 335(Pt 3):533–539
Sancak Y, Peterson TR, Shaul YD, Lindquist RA, Thoreen CC, Bar-Peled L, Sabatini DM (2008) The Rag GTPases bind raptor and mediate amino acid signaling to mTORC1. Science 320:1496–1501
Sanders MJ, Grondin PO, Hegarty BD, Snowden MA, Carling D (2007a) Investigating the mechanism for AMP activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Biochem J 403:139–148
Sanders MJ, Ali ZS, Hegarty BD, Heath R, Snowden MA, Carling D (2007b) Defining the mechanism of activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by the small molecule A-769662, a member of the thienopyridone family. J Biol Chem 282:32539–32548
Sartoretto JL, Kalwa H, Pluth MD, Lippard SJ, Michel T (2011) Hydrogen peroxide differentially modulates cardiac myocyte nitric oxide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:15792–15797
Sasaki H, Asanuma H, Fujita M, Takahama H, Wakeno M, Ito S, Ogai A, Asakura M, Kim J, Minamino T et al (2009) Metformin prevents progression of heart failure in dogs: role of AMP-activated protein kinase. Circulation 119:2568–2577
Schilling J, Kelly DP (2011) The PGC-1 cascade as a therapeutic target for heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol 51:578–583
Schlattner U, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Wallimann T (2006) Mitochondrial creatine kinase in human health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1762:164–180
Scott JW, Hawley SA, Green KA, Anis M, Stewart G, Scullion GA, Norman DG, Hardie DG (2004) CBS domains form energy-sensing modules whose binding of adenosine ligands is disrupted by disease mutations. J Clin Invest 113:274–284
Scott JW, van Denderen BJW, Jorgensen SB, Honeyman JE, Steinberg GR, Oakhill JS, Iseli TJ, Koay A, Gooley PR, Stapleton D et al (2008) Thienopyridone drugs are selective activators of AMP-activated protein kinase beta1-containing complexes. Chem Biol 15:1220–1230
Scott JW, Ling N, Issa SMA, Dite TA, O’Brien MT, Chen Z-P, Galic S, Langendorf CG, Steinberg GR, Kemp BE et al (2014) Small molecule drug A-769662 and AMP synergistically activate naive AMPK independent of upstream kinase signaling. Chem Biol 21(5):619–627
Sebbagh M, Santoni M-J, Hall B, Borg J-P, Schwartz MA (2009) Regulation of LKB1/STRAD localization and function by E-cadherin. Curr Biol 19:37–42
Shaw RJ (2009) LKB1 and AMP-activated protein kinase control of mTOR signalling and growth. Acta Physiol 196:65–80
Shaw RJ, Kosmatka M, Bardeesy N, Hurley RL, Witters LA, DePinho RA, Cantley LC (2004) The tumor suppressor LKB1 kinase directly activates AMP-activated kinase and regulates apoptosis in response to energy stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:3329–3335
Shen CH, Yuan P, Perez-Lorenzo R, Zhang Y, Lee SX, Ou Y, Asara JM, Cantley LC, Zheng B (2013) Phosphorylation of BRAF by AMPK impairs BRAF-KSR1 association and cell proliferation. Mol Cell 52:161–172
Shibata R, Ouchi N, Kihara S, Sato K, Funahashi T, Walsh K (2004) Adiponectin stimulates angiogenesis in response to tissue ischemia through stimulation of amp-activated protein kinase signaling. J Biol Chem 279:28670–28674
Shibata R, Sato K, Pimentel DR, Takemura Y, Kihara S, Ohashi K, Funahashi T, Ouchi N, Walsh K (2005) Adiponectin protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through AMPK- and COX-2-dependent mechanisms. Nat Med 11:1096–1103
Shinmura K, Tamaki K, Saito K, Nakano Y, Tobe T, Bolli R (2007) Cardioprotective effects of short-term caloric restriction are mediated by adiponectin via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Circulation 116:2809–2817
Soltys CL, Kovacic S, Dyck JR (2006) Activation of cardiac AMP-activated protein kinase by LKB1 expression or chemical hypoxia is blunted by increased Akt activity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290:H2472–H2479
Srivastava RAK, Pinkosky SL, Filippov S, Hanselman JC, Cramer CT, Newton RS (2012) AMP-activated protein kinase: an emerging drug target to regulate imbalances in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism to treat cardio-metabolic diseases. J Lipid Res 53:2490–2514
Stapleton D, Mitchelhill KI, Gao G, Widmer J, Michell BJ, Teh T, House CM, Fernandez CS, Cox T, Witters LA et al (1996) Mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase subfamily. J Biol Chem 271:611–614
Steinberg GR (2013) AMPK and the endocrine control of energy metabolism. Mol Cell Endocrinol 366:125–126
Steinberg GR, Kemp BE (2009) AMPK in health and disease. Physiol Rev 89:1025–1078
Steinberg GR, Michell BJ, van Denderen BJW, Watt MJ, Carey AL, Fam BC, Andrikopoulos S, Proietto J, Görgün CZ, Carling D et al (2006) Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced skeletal muscle insulin resistance involves suppression of AMP-kinase signaling. Cell Metab 4:465–474
Strogolova V, Orlova M, Shevade A, Kuchin S (2012) Mitochondrial porin Por1 and its homolog Por2 contribute to the positive control of Snf1 protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 11:1568–1572
Sukhodub A, Jovanovic S, Du Q, Budas G, Clelland AK, Shen M, Sakamoto K, Tian R, Jovanovic A (2007) AMP-activated protein kinase mediates preconditioning in cardiomyocytes by regulating activity and trafficking of sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive K(+) channels. J Cell Physiol 210:224–236
Sussman MA, Völkers M, Fischer K, Bailey B, Cottage CT, Din S, Gude N, Avitabile D, Alvarez R, Sundararaman B et al (2011) Myocardial AKT: the omnipresent nexus. Physiol Rev 91:1023–1070
Suter M, Riek U, Tuerk R, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Neumann D (2006) Dissecting the role of 5′-AMP for allosteric stimulation, activation, and deactivation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 281:32207–32216
Suzuki A, Okamoto S, Lee S, Saito K, Shiuchi T, Minokoshi Y (2007) Leptin stimulates fatty acid oxidation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha gene expression in mouse C2C12 myoblasts by changing the subcellular localization of the alpha2 form of AMP-activated protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol 27:4317–4327
Suzuki T, Bridges D, Nakada D, Skiniotis G, Morrison SJ, Lin JD, Saltiel AR, Inoki K (2013) Inhibition of AMPK catabolic action by GSK3. Mol Cell 50:407–419
Terai K, Hiramoto Y, Masaki M, Sugiyama S, Kuroda T, Hori M, Kawase I, Hirota H (2005) AMP-activated protein kinase protects cardiomyocytes against hypoxic injury through attenuation of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Cell Biol 25:9554–9575
Thornton C, Snowden MA, Carling D (1998) Identification of a novel AMP-activated protein kinase beta subunit isoform that is highly expressed in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem 273:12443–12450
Tian R, Musi N, D’Agostino J, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ (2001) Increased adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase activity in rat hearts with pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation 104:1664–1669
Tokarska-Schlattner M, Zaugg M, da Silva R, Lucchinetti E, Schaub MC, Wallimann T, Schlattner U (2005) Acute toxicity of doxorubicin on isolated perfused heart: response of kinases regulating energy supply. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289:H37–H47
Tokarska-Schlattner M, Lucchinetti E, Zaugg M, Kay L, Gratia S, Guzun R, Saks V, Schlattner U (2010) Early effects of doxorubicin in perfused heart: transcriptional profiling reveals inhibition of cellular stress response genes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 298:R1075–R1088
Townley R, Shapiro L (2007) Crystal structures of the adenylate sensor from fission yeast AMP-activated protein kinase. Science 315:1726–1729
Treebak JT, Birk JB, Hansen BF, Olsen GS, Wojtaszewski JFP (2009) A-769662 activates AMPK beta1-containing complexes but induces glucose uptake through a PI3-kinase-dependent pathway in mouse skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 297:C1041–C1052
Vincent O, Carlson M (1999) Gal83 mediates the interaction of the Snf1 kinase complex with the transcription activator Sip4. EMBO J 18:6672–6681
Viollet B, Athea Y, Mounier R, Guigas B, Zarrinpashneh E, Horman S, Lantier L, Hebrard S, Devin-Leclerc J, Beauloye C et al (2009) AMPK: lessons from transgenic and knockout animals. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 14:19
Viollet B, Foretz M, Schlattner U (2014) Bypassing AMPK phosphorylation. Chem Biol 21:567–569
Wallimann T, Tokarska-Schlattner M, Schlattner U (2011) The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine. Amino Acids 40:1271–1296
Wang L, Brautigan DL (2013) α-SNAP inhibits AMPK signaling to reduce mitochondrial biogenesis and dephosphorylates Thr172 in AMPKα in vitro. Nat Commun 4:1559
Wang M, Unger RH (2005) Role of PP2C in cardiac lipid accumulation in obese rodents and its prevention by troglitazone. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288:E216–E221
Wang J, Ma H, Zhang X, He L, Wu J, Gao X, Ren J, Li J (2009) A novel AMPK activator from Chinese herb medicine and ischemia phosphorylate the cardiac transcription factor FOXO3. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 1:116–126
Wang S, Song P, Zou MH (2012a) Inhibition of AMP-activated protein kinase alpha (AMPKalpha) by doxorubicin accentuates genotoxic stress and cell death in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes: role of p53 and SIRT1. J Biol Chem 287:8001–8012
Wang S, Song P, Zou MH (2012b) AMP-activated protein kinase, stress responses and cardiovascular diseases. Clin Sci 122:555–573
Watt MJ, Dzamko N, Thomas WG, Rose-John S, Ernst M, Carling D, Kemp BE, Febbraio MA, Steinberg GR (2006) CNTF reverses obesity-induced insulin resistance by activating skeletal muscle AMPK. Nat Med 12:541–548
Winder WW, Hardie DG (1996) Inactivation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in muscle during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 270:E299–E304
Winder WW, Hardie DG (1999) AMP-activated protein kinase, a metabolic master switch: possible roles in type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol 277:E1–E10
Wolff NC, Vega-Rubin-de-Celis S, Xie X-J, Castrillon DH, Kabbani W, Brugarolas J (2011) Cell-type-dependent regulation of mTORC1 by REDD1 and the tumor suppressors TSC1/TSC2 and LKB1 in response to hypoxia. Mol Cell Biol 31:1870–1884
Woods A, Johnstone SR, Dickerson K, Leiper FC, Fryer LGD, Neumann D, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Carlson M, Carling D (2003) LKB1 is the upstream kinase in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Curr Biol 13:2004–2008
Woods A, Dickerson K, Heath R, Hong S-P, Momcilovic M, Johnstone SR, Carlson M, Carling D (2005) Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-β acts upstream of AMP-activated protein kinase in mammalian cells. Cell Metab 2:21–33
Wu Y, Song P, Xu J, Zhang M, Zou M-H (2007) Activation of protein phosphatase 2A by palmitate inhibits AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 282:9777–9788
Xiao B, Heath R, Saiu P, Leiper FC, Leone P, Jing C, Walker PA, Haire L, Eccleston JF, Davis CT et al (2007) Structural basis for AMP binding to mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature 449:496–500
Xiao B, Sanders MJ, Underwood E, Heath R, Mayer FV, Carmena D, Jing C, Walker PA, Eccleston JF, Haire LF et al (2011) Structure of mammalian AMPK and its regulation by ADP. Nature 472:230–233
Xiao B, Sanders MJ, Carmena D, Bright NJ, Haire LF, Underwood E, Patel BR, Heath RB, Walker PA, Hallen S et al (2013) Structural basis of AMPK regulation by small molecule activators. Nat Commun 4:3017
Xie Z, Dong Y, Zhang M, Cui MZ, Cohen RA, Riek U, Neumann D, Schlattner U, Zou MH (2006a) Activation of protein kinase C zeta by peroxynitrite regulates LKB1-dependent AMP-activated protein kinase in cultured endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 281:6366–6375
Xie M, Zhang D, Dyck JR, Li Y, Zhang H, Morishima M, Mann DL, Taffet GE, Baldini A, Khoury DS et al (2006b) A pivotal role for endogenous TGF-beta-activated kinase-1 in the LKB1/AMP-activated protein kinase energy-sensor pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:17378–17383
Yang HJ, Jang D-J, Hwang J-T (2012) Anti-diabetic effects of Korean red pepper via AMPK and PPAR-γ activation in C2C12 myotubes. J Funct Foods 4:552–558
Young LH (2008) AMP-activated protein kinase conducts the ischemic stress response orchestra. Circulation 117:832–840
Yun H, Ha J (2011) AMP-activated protein kinase modulators: a patent review (2006–2010). Expert Opin Ther Pat 21:983–1005
Zaha VG, Young LH (2012) AMP-activated protein kinase regulation and biological actions in the heart. Circ Res 111:800–814
Zhang P, Hu X, Xu X, Fassett J, Zhu G, Viollet B, Xu W, Wiczer B, Bernlohr DA, Bache RJ et al (2008) AMP activated protein kinase-alpha2 deficiency exacerbates pressure-overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction in mice. Hypertension 52:918–924
Zhang BB, Zhou G, Li C (2009) AMPK: an emerging drug target for diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab 9:407–416
Zhang YL, Guo H, Zhang CS, Lin SY, Yin Z, Peng Y, Luo H, Shi Y, Lian G, Zhang C et al (2013) AMP as a low-energy charge signal autonomously initiates assembly of AXIN-AMPK-LKB1 complex for AMPK activation. Cell Metab 18:546–555
Zhang CS, Jiang B, Li M, Zhu M, Peng Y, Zhang YL, Wu YQ, Li TY, Liang Y, Lu Z et al (2014) The lysosomal v-ATPase-ragulator complex is a common activator for AMPK and mTORC1, acting as a switch between catabolism and anabolism. Cell Metab 20:526–540
Zheng B, Jeong JH, Asara JM, Yuan YY, Granter SR, Chin L, Cantley LC (2009) Oncogenic B-RAF negatively regulates the tumor suppressor LKB1 to promote melanoma cell proliferation. Mol Cell 33:237–247
Zhu L, Chen L, Zhou X-M, Zhang Y-Y, Zhang Y-J, Zhao J, Ji S-R, Wu J-W, Wu Y (2011) Structural insights into the architecture and allostery of full-length AMP-activated protein kinase. Structure 19:515–522
Zmijewski JW, Banerjee S, Bae H, Friggeri A, Lazarowski ER, Abraham E (2010) Exposure to hydrogen peroxide induces oxidation and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 285:33154–33164
Zou MH, Hou XY, Shi CM, Nagata D, Walsh K, Cohen RA (2002) Modulation by peroxynitrite of Akt- and AMP-activated kinase-dependent Ser1179 phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Biol Chem 277:32552–32557
Zou MH, Kirkpatrick SS, Davis BJ, Nelson JS, Wiles WG IV, Schlattner U, Neumann D, Brownlee M, Freeman MB, Goldman MH (2004) Activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase by the anti-diabetic drug metformin in vivo. Role of mitochondrial reactive nitrogen species. J Biol Chem 279:43940–43951
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all group members involved in the work cited in this review. Work of the authors on AMPK was funded by the EU FP6 and FP7 programs (contract LSHM-CT-2004-005272 EXGENESIS to U.S.; Marie-Curie grants ANTHRAWES, 041870 and ANTHRAPLUS, 249202 to M.T.S.), the French Agence Nationale de Recherche (ANR, chaire d’excellence given to U.S.), the French Région Rhône-Alpes, the French Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, and the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pelosse, M., Tokarska-Schlattner, M., Schlattner, U. (2015). AMP-Activated Protein Kinase: A Metabolic Stress Sensor in the Heart. In: Ehler, E. (eds) Cardiac Cytoarchitecture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15263-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15263-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15262-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15263-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)