Abstract
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well documented as one of the most cost-effective surgical interventions in medicine. Over the past 50 years, numerous surgical approaches have been utilized to perform a THA including posterior, mini-posterior, lateral, and anterolateral approaches. In 1996, the senior author began anterior approach (AA) THA with a special orthopaedic table. The impetus for AA THA was to avoid potential problems of existing approaches: dislocation with posterior approach and abductor weakness with anterolateral approach by preserving the abductors, short external rotators, and posterior capsule. The senior author conducted his first course on the technique in 2003 when the special orthopedic table became available.
The growth and popularity of AA THA coincided with the availability of an appropriate orthopedic table for the procedure. Since this time, the AA for THA has grown steadily and rapidly – implemented in conjunction with dedicated educational programming for surgeons learning the technique. It was hypothesized that advocating the need for a special table would hinder adoption of the approach. However, the authors believe the reverse to be true. The majority of surgeons performing AA THA today utilize the special orthopedic table. (Internet-based surveys conducted during VuMedi webinars.)
Both the technique and the procedure have evolved over the past 20 years, driven by patient demand and equipment innovations. Anterior approach THA has grown in the United States; an AAHKS survey in 2014 indicated 26 % of surgeons utilize the AA for THA. Americans are living longer, more informed due to the Internet, and expect more from health-care providers than previously. With the coincident trends of evidence-based medicine and bundled payment schemes, it is imperative for arthroplasty surgeons to achieve maximum patient satisfaction with minimum cost and complications during THA. Anterior approach THA, with its lack of postoperative dislocation precautions, potential for earlier rehabilitation and decreased length of stay, fits into this new paradigm of health care. With the addition of fluoroscopically guided implant positioning and precise determination of limb length, the AA is a powerful technique for THA.
Lastly, the authors would like to clarify the term minimally invasive. The term minimally invasive, in the context of AA, does not refer to the length of the skin incision. Rather, the term more appropriately refers to understanding the function and respecting the integrity of deeper anatomic structures so that their postoperative function is not compromised. This attention to “deep invasion” of human anatomy tends to be followed by improvements in function and pain – regardless of the skin incision. In this chapter, the authors will convey this concept and demonstrate the AA THA technique in a step-by-step manner.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mast NH, Laude F. Revision total hip arthroplasty performed through the Hueter interval. JBJS Am. 2011;93 Suppl 2:143–8.
Judet R, et al. Technique and results with the acrylic femoral head prosthesis. JBJS Br. 1952;34:173–80.
Light TR, Keggi KJ. Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. CORR. 1980;152:255–60.
Matta JM, et al. Single-incision anterior approach for THA on an orthopaedic table. CORR. 2005;441:115–24.
Matta JM, et al. The anterior approach for hip replacement. Orthopedics. 2005;28:927–8.
Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Collaborative Investigators, Bhandari M, Matta JM, et al. Outcomes following the single-incision anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study. Orthop Clin N Am. 2009;40:329–42.
Mast NH, Matta JM. Simultaneous bilateral supine AA THA: evaluation of early complications and short-term rehabilitation. Orthop Clin N Am. 2009;40:351–6.
Wegman BM, Aleto TJ, Aggarwal A, Bal BS. Making the case for anterior total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 2012;23:149–54.
Masonis J, et al. Safe and accurate: learning the direct anterior THA. Orthopedics. 2008;31(12 suppl 2):pii
Moskal JT. Anterior approach in THA improves outcomes: affirms. Orthopedics. 2011;34:e456–8.
Bourne MH, Mariani EM. A comparison between direct anterior surgery of the hip and anterolateral surgical approaches to THA: postoperative outcomes. New Orleans: AAOS; 2010, Poster #014.
Vail TP, Mariani EM. Approaches to primary total hip arthroplasty. JBJS Am. 2009;91 Suppl 5:10–2.
Barrett WP, et al. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for THA. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1634–8.
Masonis JL, et al. Effect of surgical approach and intra-operative imaging on acetabular component alignment in THA. AAHKS annual meeting, paper #58, Nov 2012.
Chengla Yi, et al. Early complications of anterior supine intermuscular THA. Orthopedics. 2013;36(3):e276–e281.
Torkos, M, et al. Comparative results of half year follow-up after primary THA with minimally invasive anterior and direct lateral approach. JBJS Br 2012;94-B no. SUPP XXXVII 124.
Berend KR, Lomabardi AV, et al. Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary THA. JBJS. 2009;91 Suppl 6:107–20.
Nakata K, et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(5):698–704.
Alecci V, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol. 12(3):123–9. doi:10.1007/s10195-011-0144-0. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
Woolson ST, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table: short term results from a community hospital. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:999–1005.
Martin CT, et al. A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to THA. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(5):849–54.
Kamath AF, Taunton MJ, Pagnano, MW. Direct anterior vs mini-posterior THA with the same advanced pain management and rehabilitation protocol: some surprises in early outcome. AAHKS annual meeting, paper #32, Nov 2013.
Barnett SL, Peters DJ, Hamilton W, Ziran NM, Gorab RS, Matta JM. Is the anterior approach safe? Early complication rate associated with 5090 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasty procedures performed using the anterior approach. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jul 11. pii:S0883-5403(15)00607-5. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.008. [Epub ahead of print].
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) 2012 National Inpatient Sample. http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov
Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F, Provencher MT, Roche M, Rubash HE. A comprehensive analysis of Medicare trends in utilization and hospital economics for total knee and hip arthroplasty from 2005 to 2011. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(1):15–8.
Ziran NM, Sherif SM, Matta JM. Safe surgical technique: iliac osteotomy via the anterior approach for revision hip arthroplasty. Patient Saf Surg. 2014;8:32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ziran, N.M., Matta, J.M. (2015). Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty with an Orthopedic Table. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15206-6_42-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15206-6_42-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15206-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine