Abstract
Adenomyosis is defined as a benign invasion from the endometrium into the myometrium, producing a diffuse increase in the uterus, showing under a microscope non-neoplastic endometrial glands and stroma surrounded by hypertrophic and hyperplastic myometrium [1]. Siegler and Camilien [2] define adenomyosis as the presence of endometrial and corium glandular cells on more than 2.5 mm from the endometrium-myometrium interface.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Definition and Clinical Findings
Adenomyosis is defined as a benign invasion from the endometrium into the myometrium, producing a diffuse increase in the uterus, showing under a microscope non-neoplastic endometrial glands and stroma surrounded by hypertrophic and hyperplastic myometrium [1]. Siegler and Camilien [2] define adenomyosis as the presence of endometrial and corium glandular cells on more than 2.5 mm from the endometrium-myometrium interface.
Adenomyosis affects women over age 30, predominantly from 40-50. It usually manifests clinically with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and menometrorrhagia, which are nonspecific symptoms that are also common in other pelvic conditions, such as myoma, endometriosis, endometrial polyps, and dysfunctional uterine bleeding [3, 4]. The physical examination only shows positive findings when there is already an increase in uterine volume [3, 4].
The prevalence of adenomyosis, according to a hysterectomy series published in the literature, varies from 5% to 70% [5]. This great variation occurs to a large extent because there is no correlation between the histological parameters used by pathologists for this diagnosis [5]. In the same uterus, incidence varied between 31% and 62%, depending on the number of biopsies that were performed [1]. The risk factors for adenomyosis are a) previous hysteroscopic surgery, and b) multiparity [6].
For many years, the diagnosis of adenomyosis was found only in the hysterectomy after surgery, usually in patients in their 30s and 40s who were symptomatic and most of the time with constituted offspring [7]. The introduction of imaging methods in the study of the pelvis allows an earlier diagnosis of adenomyosis, with excellent accuracy, and has brought with it the prospect of evaluating its impact on clinical symptoms, including infertility [8].
The relationship between adenomyosis and infertility has been much researched nowadays, due to frequent findings of adenomyosis in younger patients, and is often associated with endometriosis and infertility [8, 9]. More recent studies have shown concordance between adenomyosis and endometriosis, from 27% and even up to 70% of the cases [8, 10]. Changes in uterine peristalsis are considered one of the hypotheses of the pathophysiology of adenomyosis, and can also be one of the causes of infertility, due to irregular transport of gametes [9].
Classification
From the pathological point of view, adenomyosis can be classified as superficial (when it reaches the inner third of the myometrium), or deep (when it reaches the two outermost thirds of the myometrium) [11]. It is classified as diffuse if it affects all the walls of the uterus, and focal when it only affects a wall. For the diffuse one, the differential diagnosis is done with uterine myomatosis, and the focal form (adenomyomas) with the myomas.
The association between adenomyosis and other uterine disease is quite common. In a study, the association with other pelvic abnormalities was present in 82.5% of the cases [12]. In another publication, concomitance with uterine fibroids was seen in 38.5%, and with endometrial hyperplasia in 30.8% of the cases that were studied [13].
Image Findings
Pelvic imaging methods used for diagnosis are both transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Both methods are dependent on the examiners, and MR today is considered the method of choice in cases of clinical suspicion [3, 14, 15]. It has a sensitivity of 70–86% and a specificity of 86–93% [3].
For the diagnosis of adenomyosis on ultrasound, it is very important that the examiner pay attention to clinical information. A brief anamnesis, therefore, should always be performed. Transvaginal ultrasound, when performed by an experienced examiner, can have great diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity rates of 65 % and specificity of 97.5% [3]. In a group of patients with endometrial menometrorrhagia, without endometrial changes or myomas, the rates obtained were 80.9% of sensitivity, 100% of specificity, and 82.6% of accuracy [3]. While in a group of unselected patients who would undergo hysterectomies, the sensitivity of ultrasound was only 38.4% [12].
Various image signals associated with adenomyosis are described in the literature, and it is common to find several of them concurrently. The most important are:
Indistinct Endometrial-myometrial Junction
The loss of definition in the endometrial-myometrial transition is the characteristic sign of adenomyosis [5] (Fig. 7.1). Whether in focal areas or in a diffuse way, the presence of this uncertainty is an important parameter for the diagnosis (Figs. 7.2 and 7.3). The precise classification of the endometrium can be difficult in these situations, sometimes simulating endometrial thickening [1] (Figs. 7.4 and 7.5). MRI can confirm the diagnosis [3] (Fig. 7.6 a, b).
Increase in Uterine Volume
Adenomyosis is a common cause of increased uterine volume [16]. Usually, the body is enlarged and presents a rounded shape − that is, it acquires a globular aspect [3] (Figs. 7.7, 7.8 and 7.9). This aspect, in the absence of focal lesions, is closely associated with adenomyosis, and for some authors it is considered a parameter with high sensitivity indexes for the diagnosis [13, 14].
Asymmetrical Thickening of the Uterine Walls
Disproportion between the thickness of the uterine walls (anterior and posterior), is usually associated with adenomyosis [11] (Figs. 7.10, 7.11, 7.12, and 7.13). For some authors, this signal can increase the method specificity [12].
Heterogeneous Appearance of the Myometrium
One of the most frequent signs of adenomyosis is the heterogeneous appearance of the myometrium, usually characterized by predominantly hypoechoic areas that affect normal stratification. It was present in 84% of positive cases in a study of histopathological correlation [6] (Figs. 7.14, 7.15, 7.16, and 7.17). These heterogeneous areas, more hypoechoic, can be focal, with ill-defined margins or compromising the organ diffusely [4] (Figs. 7.18a, b, 7.19, and 7.20). It is very important to identify this textural change because it manifests itself even before the increase in uterine volume.
Cystic Myometrial Areas
The presence of anechoic areas, initially described as small intramiometrial lakes measuring between 1 and 3 mm, is associated with adenomyosis. When it was present, in the midst of heterogeneous myometrial areas, in patients without myomas or endometrial changes, it showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 81% in a study [17]. Currently called myometrial cysts, they are generally rounded, they are between 1 and 5 mm in size, and they are considered by some authors to be one of the most sensitive signs for the diagnostis of adenomyosis [3]. These cysts probably correspond to expansions of ectopic endometrial glands [13] (Figs. 7.21 and 7.22).
MR shows rounded foci ranging from 2-7 mm in diameter, with an average of 3 mm, surrounded by myometrial tissue. It is considered the main direct signal in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. They can provide high signal on T1-weighted sequences, depending on the phase of the secondary cycle to micro-hemorrhages (Fig. 7.18 a, b).
Echogenic Endometrial Striations
In some cases of adenomyosis, sub-endometrial echogenic linear images are formed, such as striations, transversely crossing the myometrium (Figs. 7.23 and 7.24). The finding of these striations or sub-endometrial echogenic nodules and asymmetry in the thickness of the walls showed high specificity for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, when correlated with histopathologic study [12]. Even alone, the sub-endometrial striations were considered, in another study, as the parameter with better specificity indexes, positive predictive value, and the most useful one for the differential diagnosis of adenomyosis and other diseases, especially uterine fibroids [11]. In MR, they have less significance when compared with the thickness of the junctional zone and detecting of myometrial cysts [13] (Fig. 7.9).
Thickening of the Junctional Zone
A thickness of more than 12 mm is considered to be the most accepted criterion in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by MR, with an accuracy of 85% and specificity of 96%.
Uterine zonal anatomy was originally described by Hricak et al [18] in 1983, evidencing a signal hypointense band with the endometrium, which was called “junctional zone.” It presents myocytes with a different morphology than other myometrial portions in its constitution, with a large nuclear area, and little extracellular matrix with a consequent small amount of water, reducing the signal on T2 weighted sequences. The concentric arrangement of myometrial fibers in the inner portion of the myometrium also adds to this (Fig. 7.10).
The junctional zone can vary according to age; it is thin in the pubarche patient, and more difficult to define in elderly patients who are post-menopausal, due to progressive loss of hydration of the outer myometrial layer, hence reducing its signal. It can also vary according to the menstrual cycle, reaching its peak during the menstrual period; some authors indicate performing MR in the ploriferative-secretorial final phase in order to increase sensitivity [18]. Its value, when regarded as normal, is less than 12 mm, with a median between 5 and 8 mm (Fig. 7.19).
Two other parameters are related to the extent of the junctional zone. The first is called junctional zone differential, described by Dueholm et al. [19] in 2001. It is calculated by the difference between the maximum and the minimum thickness of the anterior and posterior portions of the uterus. Its validity has yet to be proven, and it is not routinely used in practice. The other signal, known as ratio of junctional zone thickness and miometrial thickness, has already been rated by Bazot et al. [3], and its accuracy is not statistically better than the simple measurement of 12 mm in the true sagittal cut of sequences weighted in T2 [4, 14].
Additional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters
Contrast
Adenomyosis is most often a diffuse disease of the myometrium, it presents enhancement with inespecific patterns. Because of this, contrast use is unnecessary in most cases.
Diffusion
Focal malignant lesions typically have low ADC values, and the benign ones tend to have low values. However, high levels of ADC may be found in hemorrhages and necrosis. They can be used as a complementary tool to differentiate sarcomas of degenerated myomas, because myomas with degeneration tend to have a higher ADC, and lower signal than sarcomas. ADC and diffusion parameters with statistical significance for adenomyomas have not yet been found.
Cine-MRI
The dynamic images from Cine-MRI allow the differentiation between uterine contraction and focal adenomyosis in most of the cases. However, they are not widely used in clinical practice, because it consumed time and having been sucefully replaced by a another sagital T2 sequence, performed in the end of exam.
Differential Diagnosis
Focal Adenomyosis and Myoma
There are two types of focal adenomyosis: (a) when the disease affects a single uterine wall, or (b) when it has a pseudo-nodular feature, such as a rounded hypoechoic area, or inaccurate boundaries in relation to the adjacent myometrium, known as “adenomyoma” [20]. The adenomyoma is often confused with fibroids, and both can have the same clinical presentation. Fibroids can be surgically excised (myomectomies), while the definitive surgical treatment for adenomyomas is hysterectomy. This accurate differential diagnosis is very important, especially in patients who want to preserve fertility and will be subject to myomectomies or treatment with GnRH analogues [3].
Adenomyomas usually have ill-defined margins, while myomas are more circumscribed, with better defined edges [21, 22] (Figs. 7.25a–c, 7.26, and 7.27). In the colored Doppler study, myomas often have characteristic peripheral vasculature surrounding their margins, while adenomyomas present vascularization in their center [16] (Figs. 7.28a, b, and 7.29a, b). The presence of cystic gaps is also more frequent in adenomyomas and may eventually be present in myomas with hyaline degeneration [4]. The use of colored Doppler in these cases is essential for the differential diagnosis (Figs. 7.30a, b, and 7.31a, b). Special attention should be given in cases of concurrence between myomas and adenomyomas.
The adenomyoma, as well as the myoma, has low signal intensity on T2; however, the adenomyoma usually has small, hyperintense foci in T2, without large vessels identified on its periphery [23]. The cases of cystic adenomyoma correspond to excessive ectopic endometrial tissue, which produces focal hemorrhage. The lesion usually presents a cystic cavity greater than 1 cm, with signal content compatible with hemorrhagic material in its interior, surrounded by fibrous tissue with low signal intensity on T2 [24] (Fig. 7.32).
Adenomyosis and Endometriosis
Patients with endometriosis tend to have more severe pelvic pain than those with adenomyosis. Endometriosis is implanted in the uterine serous, and its involvement is unconventional, usually associated with the obliteration of a recto-uterine recess and impairment of the front walls of the rectum or posterior vaginal fornix. A local involvement of external fibers of the myometrium and serous are more characteristic of endometriosis with myometrial invasion than of adenomyosis, in most cases (Figs. 7.33 and 7.34).
References
Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:583–93.
Siegler AM, Camilien L. Adenomyosis. J Reprod Med. 1994;39:841–53.
Bazot M, Cortez A, Emile D, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antonie J, Uzan S. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2427–33.
Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;199:151–8.
Azziz R. Adenomyosis: Current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1989;16:221–35.
Panganamamula UR, Harmanli OH, Isik-Akbay EF, Grotegut CA, Dandolu V, Gaughan JP. Is prior uterine surgery a risk factor for adenomyosis? Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1034–8.
Lee NC, Dicker RC, Rubin GL, Ory HW. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnoses for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150:283–7.
Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Noe M, Kissler S, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis in endometriosis prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. HumReprod. 2005;20:2309–16.
Kunz G, Herbertz M, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis as a disorder of the early and late human reproductive period. Reprod BioMed Online. 2007;15:681–5.
Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, Thomassin I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Buy JN. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology. 2004;232:379–89.
Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG, Paraschos T, Winston RM. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:471–4.
Bazot M, Dara E, Rouger J, Detchev R, Cortez A, Uzan S. Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:603–11.
Keepek K, Tuncay YA, Goynumer G, Tutai E. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(3):314–5.
Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;171:531–4.
Tamai K, Koyama T, Umeoka S, Saga T, Fujii S, Togashi K. Spectrum of MR features in adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:583–602.
Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR, Chapman WB, Bret PM. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study. Radiology. 2000;215:783–90.
Chopra S, Lev-Toaff AS, Ors F, Bergin D. Adenomyosis: common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(5):617–27.
Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR. 1983;141:1119–28.
Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:588–94.
Reinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A, et al. Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology. 1995;197:609–14.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Arcaini L, Zanotti F, Carinelli S. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:94–7.
Botsis D, Kassanos D, Antoniou G, Pyrgiotis E, Karakitsos P, Kalogirou D. Adenomyoma and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasound. 1998;26:21–5.
Batzer FR, Hansen L. Bizarre sonographic appearance of an adenomyoma and its presentation. J Ultrasound Med. 1996;15:599–602.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Zanotti F, Brioschi D, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma and leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:603–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Nicola, A.L.A., de Souza, L.R.M.F. (2017). Adenomyosis. In: de Souza, L., De Nicola, A., De Nicola, H. (eds) Atlas of Imaging in Infertility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13893-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13893-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13892-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13893-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)