Abstract
Presuppositions are pragmatically considered as the conditions of the felicity of a speech act, or discourse move; however, the decision of setting the conditions of a move, which the hearer needs to accept in order to continue the dialogue, can be thought of as a speech act of a kind. The act of presupposing depends on specific conditions and in particular on the possibility of the hearer to reconstruct and accept the propositional content. These pragmatic conditions lead to epistemic considerations: How can the speaker know that the hearer can reconstruct and accept a presupposition? A possible answer can be found in an argumentative approach grounded on the notion of presumptive reasoning. On this perspective, by presupposing the speaker advances a tentative conclusion about what the hearer may accept, hold, or know proceeding from factual, linguistic, and epistemic rules of presumption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
On Ducrot’s view, the communicative game resembles a chess game, in which the possibilities are set by means of presuppositions: “dans ce combat simulé –qui substitue aux possibilités réelles, dues à la force, les possibilités morales dues aux conventions—les règles permettent aux joueurs de se contraindre mutuellement à certaines actions, et de s’en interdire certaines autres” (Ducrot 1968, p. 83); “pour trouver une description sémantique satisfaisante d’un phénomène comme la présupposition, phénomène qui est repérable selon des critères syntaxiques précis, il nous a été nécessaire de la relier aux règles qui définissent conventionnellement le jeu du langage, et de décrire la présupposition par rapport aux manœuvres dont elle fournit le thème : sa réalité, comme celle d’une règle des échecs, consiste seulement à rendre possible un jeu” (Ducrot 1972b, p. 27).
References
Antley, Kenneth. 1974. McCawley’s theory of selectional restriction. Foundations of Language 11 (2): 257–272.
Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides. 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition. Journal of Semantics 15:239–299. Atlas, Jay. 2005. Logic, meaning, and conversation: Semantical underdeterminacy, implicature and their interface. New York: Oxford University Press.
Atlas, Jay. 2008. Presupposition. In The handbook of pragmatics, ed. Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, 29–52. Oxford: Blackwell.
Austin, John. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bach, Kent. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22:237–366.
Bach, Kent. 2003. Speech acts and pragmatics. In Blackwell’s. guide to the philosophy of language, ed. Michael Devitt and Richard Hanley, 147–167. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ballard Lee, Robert Conrad, and Robert Longacre. 1971. The deep and surface grammar of interclausal relations. Foundations of Language 7 (1) :70–118.
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1989. The limits to debate: A revised theory of semantic presupposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Capone, Alessandro. 2005. Pragmemes. Journal of Pragmatics 37:1355–1371.
Capone, Alessandro. 2013. The pragmatics of pronominal clitics and propositional attitudes. Intercultural Pragmatics 10 (3): 459–485.
Carroll, Lewis. 2010. Alice’s adventures in Wonderland and Through the looking glass. New York: Cosimo.
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Blackwell. Chomsky, Noam. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology, ed. Danny Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits, 183–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. In Goals of linguistic theory, ed. Stanley Peters, 63–130. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.
Crothers, Edward. 1979. Paragraph structure inference. Norwood: Ablex.
Ducrot, Oswald. 1966. “Le roi de France est sage”. Implication logique et présupposition linguistique. Etudes de linguistique appliquée 4:39–47.
Ducrot, Oswald. 1968. Le structuralisme en linguistique. In Qu’est-ce que le structuralisme? eds. Oswald Ducrot, Tzvetan Todorov et al., 13–96. Paris: Seuil.
Ducrot, Oswald. 1972a. Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann
Ducrot, Oswald. 1972b. De Saussure à la philosophie du langage. Preface to John Searle, Les actes de langage, 7–34. Paris: Hermann
Ducrot, Oswald. 1978. Deux mais. Cahiers de linguistique 8:109–120.
Frege, Gottlob. 1948. Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review 57 (3): 209–230.
Green, Georgia. 1996. Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, ed. Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grimes, Joseph. 1975. The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton.
Grosz, Barbara, and Candace Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12 (3): 175–204.
Gundel, Jeanette, and Thorstein Fretheim. 2004. Topic and focus. In The handbook of pragmatics, ed. Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, 174–196. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hamblin, Charles. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.
Hickey, Leo. 1993. Presupposition under cross-examination. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 6 (16): 89–109.
Hobbs, Jerry. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3:67–90.
Hobbs, Jerry. 1985. On the coherence and structure of discourse. Report No. CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
Hockett, Charles. 1950. Peiping morphophonemics. Language 26 (1): 63–85.
Horn, Laurence, and Gregory Ward. 2004. The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4 (2): 169–193.
Katz, Jerrold. 1973. On defining “Presupposition”. Linguistic Inquiry 4 (2): 256–260.
Katz, Jerrold, and Jerry Fodor. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39 (2): 170–210.
Kauffeld, Fred. 1998. Presumptions and the distribution of argumentative burdens in acts of proposing and accusing. Argumentation 12:245–266.
Keenan, Edward. 1971. Two types of presupposition in natural language. In Studies in linguistic semantics, eds. Charles Fillmore and Terence Langendoen, 45–54. New York: Holt.
Kempson, Ruth. 1975. Presupposition and the delimitations of semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, Robin. 1971. If's, and’s, and but’s about conjunction. In Studies in linguistic semantics, eds. Charles Fillmore and Terence Langendoen, 115–150. New York: Holt.
Levin, Samuel. 1977. The semantics of metaphor. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8:339–359.
Macagno, Fabrizio. 2008. Dialectical relevance and dialogical context in Walton's pragmatic theory. Informal Logic 28 (2): 102–128.
Macagno, Fabrizio. 2012. Presumptive reasoning in interpretation. Implicatures and conflicts of presumptions. Argumentation 26 (2): 233–265
Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. 2014. Emotive language in argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Manzoni, Alessandro. 2011. I Promessi Sposi Or The Betrothed. Great literature online. 1997–2011. http://manzoni.classicauthors.net/IPromessiSposiOrTheBetrothed/IPromessiSposiOrTheBetrothed6.html. Accessed 14 May 2011.
McCawley, James. 1971. Interpretative semantics meets Frankenstein. Foundations of Language 7:285–296.
Rescher, Nicholas. 2006. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rigotti, Eddo. 2005. Congruity theory and argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, Special issue 75–96.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Cigada. 2004. La comunicazione verbale. Milano: Apogeo.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Andrea Rocci. 2001. Sens—non-sens—contresens. Studies in Communication Sciences 2:45–80.
Rigotti, Eddo, and Andrea Rocci. 2006. Tema-rema e connettivo: la congruità semantico-pragmatica del testo. In Syndesmoi: connettivi nella realtà dei testi, eds. Giovanni Gobber, Maria Cristina Gatti, and Sara Cigada, 3–44. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
Sandulescu, George. 1975. Presupposition, assertion, and discourse structure. In Reports on text linguistics: Approaches to word order, ed. Nils-Erik Enkvist and Viljo Kohonen, 197–214. Åbo: Meddelanden från Åbo Akademi Forskningsinstitut.
Schwarz, David. 1977. On pragmatic presupposition. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (2): 247–257.
Searle, John, and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seuren, Pieter. 2000. Presupposition, negation and trivalence. Journal of Linguistics 36:261–297.
Simons, Mandy. 2013. On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, ed. Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, 329–348. Dordrecht: Springer.
Soames, Scott. 1982. How presuppositions are inherited: A solution to the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 13 (3): 483–545.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1970. Pragmatics. Synthese 22 (1–2): 272–289.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Presuppositions. In Semantics und philosophy, ed. Milton Munitz and Peter Unger, 197–214. New York: New York University Press.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 7 (1), 3–19.
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25:701–721.
Strawson, Peter. 1950. On referring. Mind 59:320–344.
Strawson, Peter. 1952. Introduction to logical theory. London: Methuen.
Strawson, Peter. 1971. Identifying reference and truth-Values. In Logico-linguistic papers, ed. Peter Strawson, 75–95. London: Methuen.
Thayer, James. 1898. A preliminary treatise on evidence at the common law. Boston: Little Brown & Co.
Ullman-Margalit, E. 1983. On presumption. The Journal of Philosophy 80 (3), 143–163.
Vanderveken, Daniel. 2002. Universal grammar and speech act theory. In Essays in speech act theory, ed. Daniel Vanderveken and Susumu Kubo, 25–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
von Fintel, Kai. 2008. What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives 22:137–170.
Walton, Douglas. 1989. Informal logic. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, Douglas. 1993. The speech act of presumption. Pragmatics & Cognition 1 (1): 125–148.
Walton, Douglas. 1998. The new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Walton, Douglas. 1999. Dialectical relevance in persuasion dialogue. Informal Logic 19:119–143.
Walton, Douglas, and Erik Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue. Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Walton, Douglas, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2005a. Common knowledge and argumentation schemes. Studies in Communication Sciences 5 (2): 1–22.
Walton, Douglas, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2005b. Common knowledge in legal reasoning about evidence. International Commentary on Evidence 3 (1): 1–42.
Wilson, Deirdre. 1975. Presupposition and non-truth-conditional semantics. London: Academic.
Wüest, Jakob. 2001. La gerarchia degli atti linguistici nel testo. Studies in communication sciences 1 (1): 195–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macagno, F. (2016). Presupposition as Argumentative Reasoning. In: Capone, A., Mey, J. (eds) Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12615-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12616-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)