Skip to main content

Trust

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 83 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of trust is central to bioethical theories; however, until recently, the topic has received little explicit analysis in many of these theories. Over the last 15 years, a large body of recent philosophical and empirical social science and medical literature has examined the role, impact, and function of trust in bioethics. This entry briefly examines the history of the concept of trust in the bioethics, particularly the role that trust played in medicine in the pre-bioethics era, the role that the lack of trust has played in the emergence of bioethics as an area of inquiry, as well as how the literature on trust has evolved in philosophy and bioethics. The prevailing philosophical concept of trust is discussed and reviewed, specifically its nature as an interpersonal attitude that one agent may harbor toward another and the conditions that justify its placement, including the controversial question of motivation. Finally, several ethical dimensions of trust are discussed from a theoretical perspective, namely, the role of trust within virtue ethics and feminist bioethics and critical views on trust as it relates to the practice of informed consent and public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baier, A. C. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96, 231–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr Goold, S. (2001). Trust and the ethics of health care institutions. Hastings Centre Report, 31(6), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. (1992). Trust, distrust, and feminist theory. Hypatia, 7(1), 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2005). The importance of trust for ethics, law and public policy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 14, 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (1996). Trust as an affective attitude. Ethics, 107(1), 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (1998). Rethinking feminist ethics: Care, trust and empathy. Florence: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (2000). Introduction: Autonomy refigured. In C. Mackenzie & N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self (pp. 3–34). Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, N. C., & O’Neill, O. (2007). Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, C. (2002). Self trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (2002). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (1991). Trust and distrust in professional ethics. In E. D. Pellegrino, R. M. Veach, & J. P. Langan (Eds.), Ethics, trust and the professions: Philosophical and cultural aspects (pp. 69–85). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peperzak, A. T. (2013). Trust: Who or what might support us? New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruokonen, F. (2013). Trust, trustworthiness, and responsibility. In P. Makela & C. Townley (Eds.), Trust: Analytic and applied perspectives (pp. 1–14). The Netherlands: Rodopi Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, C., & Garfield, J. L. (2010). Public trust. In P. Makela & C. Townley (Eds.), Trust: Analytic and applied perspectives (pp. 95–108). The Netherlands: Rodopi Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose Geransar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Geransar, R. (2016). Trust. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_426

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics