Abstract
Precautionary reasoning has deep historical and wide cross-cultural roots in the ethics of health, health care, and medical research. As in general ethics, however, this side of bioethical thinking has not been the subject of focused critical analysis until recently. The emergence of the precautionary principle (PP) in general environmental and technology policy debate has, after an initial period of confusion, resulted in a range of possible ideas about the value of precaution and what sacrifices it may be worth. This has indicated some need for developments in ethical as well as decision theory. In bioethical debates, this process has left only vague traces, however. Although many issues exist where precautionary reasoning has a place, this is either often left unnoticed or arguments developed suffer from elementary flaws. Environmental and general public health ethics, the ethics of evidence-based practice in research, as well as clinical decision-making, management of normative or factual uncertainty, and the nature of clinical ethical virtues are all areas where precautionary ideas seem to have a place. Such reasoning moreover has specific relevance for global approaches to bioethics and health policy issues in a number of ways.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attena, F. (2014). Complexity and indeterminism of evidence-based public health: An analytical framework. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17, 459–465.
Bradshaw, R. H. (1998). Consciousness in non-human animals: Adopting the precautionary principle. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5, 108–114.
Coggon, J., & Gola, S. (Eds.). (2014). Global health and international community: Ethical, political and regulatory challenges. London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.
Ford, N. M. (1990). Ethics, science and embryos: weihing the evidence. The Tablet, January 13, 1990, 14.
Gardiner, S. M. (2006). A core precautionary principle. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 33–60.
Harris, J., & Holm, S. (2002). Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27, 355–368.
Jonas, H. (1979). Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.
Kuhlau, F., Höglund, A. T., Evers, K., & Eriksson, S. (2011). A precautionary principle for dual use research in the life sciences. Bioethics, 25, 1–8.
Mahoney, J. (1984). Bioethics and belief. London: Sheed & Ward.
Malmqvist, E., Juth, N., Lynøe, N., & Helgesson, G. (2011). Early stopping of clinical trials: Charting the ethical terrain. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 21, 51–78.
Manson, N. A. (2002). Formulating the precautionary principle. Environmental Ethics, 24, 263–274.
McKinney, W. J., & Hill, H. H. (2000). Of sustainability and precaution: The logical, epistemological, and moral problems of the precautionary principle and their implications for sustainable development. Ethics and the Environment, 5, 77–87.
McKinnon, C. (2011). Climate change and future justice: Precaution, compensation and triage. London: Routledge.
Munthe, C. (2011). The price of precaution and the ethics of risk. Dordrecht/London/New York: Springer.
Resnik, D. B. (2013). Environmental health ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandin, P. (1999). Dimensions of the precautionary principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 5, 889–907.
Sandin, P. (2009). A new virtue-based understanding of the precautionary principle. In M. A. Bedau & C. E. Parke (Eds.), The ethics of protocells: Moral and social implications of creating life in the laboratory (pp. 89–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vos, R., Willems, D., & Houtepen, R. (2004). Coordinating the norms and values of medical research, medical practice and patient worlds – The ethics of evidence based medicine in orphaned fields of medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 166–170.
Wilson, J., & Hunter, D. (2010). Research exceptionalism. American Journal of Bioethics, 10, 45–54.
Further Readings
Asveld, L., & Roeser, S. (Eds.). (2009). The ethics of technological risk. London/Sterling: Earthscan.
Munthe, C. (2013). Precautionary principle. In H. La Folette, J. Deigh, & S. Stroud (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of ethics. London/New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Sandin, P., & Peterson, M. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of risk theory: Epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk. Dordrecht/London/New York: Springer.
Steel, D. (2015). Philosophy and the precautionary principle: Science, evidence and environmental policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Munthe, C. (2016). Precautionary Principle. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_344
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_344
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09482-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09483-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities