Skip to main content

Genetic Screening

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

Advances in technology, especially DNA sequencing, have greatly increased the potential capacity of genetic screening in public health programs. In contrast to the reactive nature of most health professional activities, where professionals respond to the preexisting concerns of their patients, in screening it is the professionals who are proactive in approaching individuals who, until that point, have regarded themselves as “healthy” or “well”: the goal is to identify latent disease or future risk of disease. This is usually performed on population subgroups (often based on age, gender, and ethnicity). Screening programs include newborn, antenatal, carrier status, and disease susceptibility screening. The scope of screening has extended from the use of relatively simple and inexpensive screening tests for highly treatable conditions to a complex and diverse range of program screening for rare disorders or using complex algorithms to infer clinically relevant information, as with fetal DNA in maternal plasma.

Long-established screening criteria are being challenged by the increased capacities of laboratory systems, especially the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing. This blurs the formerly fairly clear distinction between reactive, diagnostic testing and proactive screening tests. This distinction breaks down when genome-wide methods are employed as the favored laboratory method in the diagnostic assessment of a wide range of disorders. The test being used in a diagnostic process yields up information that is incidental to the diagnostic question, so that the diagnostic test has now become also a genome-wide screening test.

This article examines the recent history of screening criteria and summarizes the ethical issues related to genetic and genomic screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andermann, A., Blancquaert, I., Beauchamp, S., & Déry, V. (2008). Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: A review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(4), 317–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, R. (2011). The communitarian turn: Myth or reality? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20, 546–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, R., Capps, B., Chalmers, D., Clarke, A., Clayton, E. W., Liu, E., Lysaght, T., Mulvihill, J. J., & Winslet, M. (2013). Imagined futures: Capturing the benefits of genome sequencing for society. Human Genome Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Wert, G. M., Dondorp, W. J., & Knoppers, B. M. (2012). Preconception care and genetic risk: Ethical issues. Journal of Community Genetics, 3(3), 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., McGuire, A., Nussbaum, R. L., O’Daniel, J. M., Ormond, K. E., Rehm, H. L., Watson, M. S., Williams, M. S., & Biesecker, L. G. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7), 565–574. Published online 22 Mar 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. C., Knoppers, B. M., Cornel, M. C., Clayton, E. W., Senecal, K., & Borry P. (2015). Whole-genome sequencing in newborn screening? A statement on the continued importance of targeted approaches in newborn screening programmes. European Journal of Human Genetics. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.289. [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Genetics Commission. (2006). Making babies. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsmore, S. F. (2013). Incidental swimming with millstones. Science Translational Medicine, 5(194), 194ed10. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006900. PMID: 23863830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leib, J. R., Gollust, S. E., Hull, S. C., & Wilfond, B. S. (2005). Carrier screening panels for Ashkenazi Jews: Is more better? Genetics in Medicine, 7(3), 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, K. A., Avard, D., Simard, J., & Knoppers, B. M. (2013). Personalized medicine and access to health care: Potential for inequitable access? European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(2), 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2006). Genetic screening: A supplement to the 1993 report by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2010). Medical profiling and online medicine: The ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principals and practice of screening for disease. Geneva: WHO. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/37650/1/WHO_PHP_34.pdf. Last accessed 14 July 2015.

Further Readings

  • Clarke, A. J. (2014). Managing the ethical challenges of next generation sequencing in genomic medicine. British Medical Bulletin, 111(1), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S., & Buchbander, M. (2012). Saving babies? The consequences of newborn genetic screening. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurkiewicz, I. R., et al. (2014). Prenatal whole genome sequencing: Is the quest to know a fetus future ethical? Obstetrical and Gynecology Survey, 69(4), 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Katherine Burke or Angus Clarke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Burke, K., Clarke, A. (2016). Genetic Screening. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_212

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics