Abstract
Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a major contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and given its association with age, the prevalence of CAVD is expected to rise with an increase in worldwide life expectancy. Currently, no therapies exist for the treatment or prevention of CAVD. Much of our understanding of the progression of CAVD has originated from preclinical data using optical molecular imaging of animal models. Through these studies we now know that CAVD is an inflammatory disease with a fibrocalcific endpoint. In this chapter, we will review the preclinical molecular imaging data that have shaped our current understanding of CAVD, and we will discuss the future role that molecular imaging technologies may play in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this disease.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Aortic Valve Structure, Function, and Disease
The aortic valve is a highly dynamic tissue that is situated between the left ventricle and the aorta and is responsible for maintaining unidirectional blood flow from the heart to the systemic circulation. This function is highly dependent on the structure of three thin leaflets attached to the base of the valve annulus. The action of the leaflets is governed largely by the pressure generated through the pumping action of the heart [1]. Pressure generated in the left ventricle during systolic contraction forces the leaflets to protrude into the aorta, opening the valve annulus such that blood can pass from the heart into systemic circulation (Fig. 9.1a). As the heart rests in diastole, the back pressure generated forces the leaflets back toward the ventricle, whereupon the adjacent leaflets meet to seal the valve and prevent retrograde blood flow (Fig. 9.1b).
The leaflets must simultaneously exhibit the compliance necessary for opening during systole and the biomechanical strength to resist prolapse back into the left ventricle during diastole [2]. This is accomplished through a layered leaflet microarchitecture that is crucial to ensure proper valve function [3]. The aortic side of the leaflets, a region known as the fibrosa layer, is composed of circumferentially aligned collagen fibers that straighten during diastole and serve as the main tensile load bearing component of the leaflets (Fig. 9.1c) [4]. On the ventricular side of the leaflets, an elastin layer, known as the ventricularis, confers radial elasticity that allows the valve to open during systole and allows the leaflets to stretch radially and meet to close the valve during diastole [5]. An intermediary layer, known as the spongiosa, is enriched in glycosaminoglycans and is believed to serve as a lubricating layer between the fibrosa and ventricularis. This microarchitecture is maintained by two resident cell populations: the aortic valve endothelial cells (VECs) that sheath the leaflets and the aortic valve interstitial cells (VICs) that reside within the leaflets. Inflammation and pathological differentiation of these resident cells have been shown to lead to calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Histopathological analyses of CAVD reveal fibrotic collagen accumulation and the formation of calcific nodules on the aortic side of the leaflets [6]. These changes disrupt the microarchitecture of the leaflets and thereby compromise the biomechanical integrity of the aortic valve. The following sections detail the cellular and molecular changes observed in CAVD and the role that molecular imaging may play in both research and clinical intervention.
2 Imaging Criteria for Aortic Valve Disease
CAVD is a major contributor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Of particular concern, the prevalence of CAVD is projected to increase dramatically due to the shift in age-related population demographics with an aging baby boomer generation. Moderate-to-severe symptoms of CAVD are observed in 2.8 % of patients over 75 years of age [7, 8]. Given this strong association with age, for many years, CAVD was presumed to be a passive, degenerative disease that occurs due to fatigue or a wearing out of the tissue caused by the stresses and strains of cardiac function as the aortic valve opens and closes more than three billion times over the course of an average life span [9]. Recently, however, the results of many studies on the molecular signaling processes associated with valvular homeostasis have led to a paradigm shift with CAVD now viewed as an active, cellular-driven disease [10]. This view offers some hope to patients as cellular processes may be targeted therapeutically; however, no clinically relevant therapeutic options for CAVD have been discovered.
The development of a therapeutic for CAVD dovetails with the need for detection strategies to identify early changes within the leaflets [11]. Once calcium deposits form within the valve, reversibility is unclear; however, inflammation and the early extracellular matrix remodeling responses that presage gross fibrosis and calcific nodule formation may fall within an appropriate therapeutic window (Fig. 9.2). Traditional detection of valvular insufficiency using echocardiography is unable to identify these early leaflet changes as regurgitant blood flow and leaflet thickening represent later stages of CAVD remodeling and calcification. Recently, PET/CT imaging modalities have emerged as a means to detect inflammation and mineralization within valve leaflets of human patients [12], and optical molecular imaging strategies have been successfully employed to visualize the progression of CAVD in mice [13]. These technologies are far more sensitive to small changes within the leaflets and may offer the resolution necessary to identify patients that fall within the appropriate therapeutic time frame. Utilizing these imaging strategies may also give better insight into the temporal aspects of CAVD and may lead to a better understanding of the required therapeutic strategy at each stage of CAVD.
The reader should note that many of the processes and techniques discussed in this chapter overlap with those discussed in Chap. 5 . Many of the pathophysiological changes in CAVD and vascular calcification overlap; however, it should be noted that these diseases are now believed to have distinct etiologies [14]. Not every patient who presents prominent vascular calcification also exhibits signs of CAVD, suggesting that at least an extra set of variables are involved in CAVD initiation and progression. Further, valve cells are phenotypically different than their vascular counterparts, and therefore, different factors seem to be responsible for producing the fibrocalcific endpoint that is apparent in both diseases. The goal of molecular imaging for these two diseases is also different. In vascular calcification, a collagen-rich fibrous cap with a large calcification may serve to stabilize the atherosclerotic plaque [15, 16]; therefore, the first goal in imaging of atherosclerotic lesions is to identify regions of collagen disruption and the formation of spotty microcalcifications that lead to plaque instability. Conversely, in CAVD, aortic valve leaflet microarchitecture is essential to the appropriate biomechanical function of the valve. Therefore, molecular imaging tools should be designed around early identification of valve remodeling prior to the potentially irreversible endpoints of fibrosis and calcification. In this chapter, we will focus on the preclinical studies that have exhibited promise in imaging processes involved in CAVD and the novel findings that have resulted from these imaging modalities. We will also use our current understanding of the molecular underpinnings of CAVD to propose potential new targets for imaging that might distinguish CAVD from vascular calcification. Finally, we will discuss how molecular imaging techniques may be translated to clinical use to identify early markers of CAVD in patients.
3 Valve Endothelial Cell Activation and Migration
In other parts of the vascular system, endothelial cells have been observed to play a crucial role in the transduction of mechanical signals such as changes in shear stress [17]. Because these cells are the first to experience any changes in outside forces that affect valve dynamics, they have received growing attention in their potential roles in regulating valve homeostasis. VECs are phenotypically distinct from endothelial cells in the vasculature [18]. For instance, when subjected to the shear stresses of fluid flow, VECs align perpendicular to the flow [18]; whereas, endothelial cells from the aorta align parallel to the flow [17, 19]. This indicates that the VECs may play a distinct role in regulating the biomechanical properties of the valve through specially evolved mechanisms. Furthermore, VECs have been observed to exhibit genotypic heterogeneity along the surface of each leaflet. Simmons et al. found that 584 genes were differentially expressed between VECs from the aortic side and the ventricular side [20]. These genotypic differences may be important in regulating the differing biomechanical properties on each side of the valve, i.e., the collagen of the fibrosa and the elastin of the ventricularis, or conversely, the gene expression of these cells may be influenced by the differing shear stresses seen on each side of the leaflet.
VECs have also been shown to play a role in the etiology and progression of valve disease. In diseased or injured vascular tissues, endothelial cells direct the appropriate immune response through increased expression of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) that mediate attachment and activation of leukocytes as well as by secreting cytokines that are recognized by specialized inflammatory cells [21–24]. Similarly, VECs have been observed to increase expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and secretion of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-8, IL-1β, and IFN-γ in response to oscillatory, turbulent fluid flows and pathological mechanical strains [25]. As discussed in the following section, the accumulation of leukocytes and related inflammatory cytokines is positively correlated with remodeling in CAVD leaflets and aortic stenosis in human patients. Ex vivo MRI and near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of a VCAM-1-targeted agent demonstrated VEC activation localized in regions where the valve leaflets meet the aortic root [26] (Fig. 9.3). Correspondingly, this area of the leaflet—known as the commissure—experiences the greatest amount of mechanical stress and, therefore, is most likely to experience VEC damage that leads to CAM expression [27].
VECs may also play an important, though lesser known, function in CAVD, and the spatial heterogeneity of these cells could be responsible for the side-specific susceptibility to CAVD observed in histopathological analyses of diseased leaflets [20]. The VECs directly adjacent to the fibrosa have been found to express much lower levels of anti-calcification enzymes when compared to the VECs on the ventricular side of the leaflets [25]. This suggests that the VECs may also play an important role in sensing and responding to the various stresses on each side of the leaflets. Recent studies have suggested that VECs play an active role in valve remodeling during CAVD by invading the leaflet interstitium through endothelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) processes that mirror those from development [28, 29]. The addition of mechanical strain to either valve leaflets in vivo or an in vitro culture system of VECs led to the expression of mesenchymal markers such as smooth muscle α-actin (α-SMA) within the VECs [28] (Fig. 9.4). VECs isolated from ovine mitral valve leaflets were shown to exhibit a propensity for osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation that was not found in vascular endothelial cells [30]. Markers of differentiation were exacerbated by exposing leaflets to mechanical strain. Therefore, future high-resolution imaging techniques may be able to search for localization of VEC marker proteins within the interstitial space or mesenchymal markers on the leaflet surface as early signs of CAVD.
4 Macrophages and Proteolytic Activity
Activation of VECs leads to the recruitment of monocytes and other leukocytes to the valve leaflets. As a result, CAVD (similar to calcification in atherosclerotic plaques) is hallmarked by the presence of inflammatory cells, such as macrophages and T cells, within and surrounding calcified regions of the tissue [12, 31–33]. Molecular imaging techniques using macrophage-targeted iron nanoparticles conjugated to a NIRF agent identified a strong correlation between macrophage accumulation and calcification in aortic valves of apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE−/−) mice [34] (Fig. 9.5). These cells may play a role in initiating the remodeling processes that lead to calcification, as they actively release proteases that degrade extracellular matrix components, priming the tissue for new matrix secretion. Additionally, the accumulation of leukocytes and related inflammatory cytokines is positively correlated with remodeling in CAVD leaflets and aortic stenosis in human patients. Similarly, in an apoE−/− mouse model of atherosclerosis and CAVD, enzymatically activatable NIRF signal corresponding to a specific protease cathepsin B (as validated by immunohistological techniques) was shown to co-localize with macrophages within the valve leaflets (Fig. 9.6) [13].
Other members of the cathepsin family are involved in elastin degradation. As mentioned in the first section, the ventricularis layer of the aortic valve is composed mainly of elastin that allows the valve leaflets to exhibit a high radial strain response to diastolic loading. Disruption of this elastin layer has been shown to result in pathological remodeling associated with CAVD [34–36]. Chronic renal disease (CRD) is strongly correlated with CAVD in human patients, and CAVD processes in apoE−/− mice are accelerated by inducing CRD through resection of 5/6 of the total kidney volume (5/6 nephrectomy). Interestingly, induction of CRD in apoE−/− mice leads to a marked increase in activity of the elastolytic enzyme cathepsin S as shown by an enzymatically activatable NIRF agent. Deletion of cathepsin S in these mice mitigates CAVD progression [34]. Cathepsin S remodeling in this mouse model was found to be closely associated with the presence of inflammatory cell markers within the leaflets. In addition, elastin degradation peptides, also known as matrikines, highly biologically active molecules, may induce VIC osteogenic differentiation in aortic valves [34]. Application of pathological cyclic strain to aortic valve leaflets in an ex vivo bioreactor demonstrated significant increases in activity of cathepsin S and a similar protease, cathepsin K, within the leaflets.
5 Myofibroblast Activation, Osteogenic Differentiation, and Calcification
As noted in the vessel wall, molecular imaging of calcific mineral deposition has been achieved using bisphosphonates conjugated to NIRF molecules [37]. Bisphosphonates have a structure similar to the calcification inhibitor pyrophosphate [38] and is believed to bind to calcium and accumulate in mineralized crystals [39]. The accumulation of NIRF-bisphosphonates in calcific regions of CAVD leaflets yields detectable NIRF signal that is spectrally distinct from the protease agents discussed in the previous section, allowing for simultaneous imaging of these processes [40] (Fig. 9.7).
The mechanisms of mineralization are less clearly understood in CAVD compared to vascular calcification. As mentioned, VICs reside within the leaflet of the valve and directly remodel and maintain the microarchitecture of the leaflets by synthesis and degradation of extracellular matrix components [41, 42]. In the healthy adult valve, VICs remain in a quiescent state with characteristics similar to fibroblasts; however, these specialized cells exhibit a high degree of phenotypic plasticity with VIC differentiation observed during periods of valve development and disease [41]. Notably, activation of VICs to a myofibroblast phenotype—characterized by an increased expression of smooth muscle cell protein markers—is observed within developing valve leaflets and within fibrotic and calcific valve leaflets. This activated phenotype is believed to be responsible for the synthesis and remodeling of the extracellular matrix, and overactive VICs may be responsible for fibrotic accumulation of collagen during the initial stages of CAVD [43, 44]. Studies have also suggested that myofibroblastic VICs contribute to the formation of calcific nodules through cell death-mediated mechanisms [45, 46]. Additionally, markers of osteogenic differentiation of VICs have been observed in CAVD and may be responsible for the osteogenic nodules observed within CAVD leaflets [47]. The relationship between the activated myofibroblast and osteogenic phenotypes remains unknown. In addition to VICs, in pro-calcific environment, macrophages within the atherosclerotic plaque may actively participate in the deposition of calcium phosphate minerals [48], and similar processes may be relevant in CAVD. As we accrue more knowledge into the underlying mechanisms and roles of VECs, macrophages, and VIC phenotypes in the progression of CAVD, new imaging probes may be developed to target specific cellular processes of interest.
6 Future Perspectives
The molecular mechanisms of CAVD initiation and progression are less clear than those involved in the progression of vascular calcification. One reason for this is the lack of suitable in vitro models that adequately recapitulate the phenotypes observed in ex vivo analyses of CAVD tissues. The molecular imaging techniques outlined in this chapter have helped overcome these limitations by allowing detailed analysis of the cellular and molecular processes of CAVD in situ. The findings from these studies have provided valuable information concerning the temporal and endpoint aspects of CAVD. Moving forward, as these optical imaging techniques evolve, they may be incorporated into more traditional techniques of valve imaging that will be discussed in the following chapters. By combining these tools, researchers and clinicians would be able to connect gross changes in valve morphology and function to associated changes on the cellular and molecular level. These data may then be used to develop new benchtop models and paradigms of CAVD that would inform the ongoing search for CAVD therapies.
References
Yoganathan AP, He Z, Casey JS. Fluid mechanics of heart valves. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004;6:331–62.
Sacks MS, Yoganathan AP. Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1369–91.
Sacks MS, Smith DB, Hiester ED. The aortic valve microstructure: effects of transvalvular pressure. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;41:131–41.
Stella JA, Liao J, Sacks MS. Time-dependent biaxial mechanical behavior of the aortic heart valve leaflet. J Biomech. 2007;40:3169–77.
Schoen F. Aortic valve structure-function correlations: role of elastic fibers no longer a stretch of the imagination. J Heart Valve Dis. 1997;6:1–6.
Schoen FJ, Edwards WD. Valvular heart disease: general principles and stenosis. In: Silver MD, Gotlieb AI, Schoen FJ, editors. Cardiovascular pathology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. 402–42.
Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Magid D, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER, Moy CS, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Schreiner PJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2013 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2013;127:e6–245.
Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005–11.
Otto CM. Calcific aortic stenosis–time to look more closely at the valve. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1395–8.
Rajamannan NM, Evans FJ, Aikawa E, Grande-Allen KJ, Demer LL, Heistad DD, Simmons CA, Masters KS, Mathieu P, O’Brien KD, Schoen FJ, Towler DA, Yoganathan AP, Otto CM. Calcific aortic valve disease: not simply a degenerative process: a review and agenda for research from the national heart and lung and blood institute aortic stenosis working group. Executive summary: calcific aortic valve disease-2011 update. Circulation. 2011;124:1783–91.
New SE, Aikawa E. Molecular imaging insights into early inflammatory stages of arterial and aortic valve calcification. Circ Res. 2011;108:1381–91.
Dweck MR, Jones C, Joshi NV, Fletcher AM, Richardson H, White A, Marsden M, Pessotto R, Clark JC, Wallace WA, Salter DM, McKillop G, van Beek EJ, Boon NA, Rudd JH, Newby DE. Assessment of valvular calcification and inflammation by positron emission tomography in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2012;125:76–86.
Aikawa E, Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik D, Lok VM, Jaffer FA, Aikawa M, Weissleder R. Multimodality molecular imaging identifies proteolytic and osteogenic activities in early aortic valve disease. Circulation. 2007;115:377–86.
Hutcheson JD, Aikawa E, Merryman WD. Potential drug targets for calcific aortic valve disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:218–31.
Libby P, Sasiela W. Plaque stabilization: can we turn theory into evidence? Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:26P–33.
Lin TC, Tintut Y, Lyman A, Mack W, Demer LL, Hsiai TK. Mechanical response of a calcified plaque model to fluid shear force. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:1535–41.
Stamatas GN, McIntire LV. Rapid flow-induced responses in endothelial cells. Biotechnol Prog. 2001;17:383–402.
Butcher JT, Penrod AM, Garcia AJ, Nerem RM. Unique morphology and focal adhesion development of valvular endothelial cells in static and fluid flow environments. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1429–34.
Cucina A, Sterpetti AV, Pupelis G, Fragale A, Lepidi S, Cavallaro A, Giustiniani Q, Santoro DAL. Shear stress induces changes in the morphology and cytoskeleton organisation of arterial endothelial cells. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995;9:86–92.
Simmons CA, Grant GR, Manduchi E, Davies PF. Spatial heterogeneity of endothelial phenotypes correlates with side-specific vulnerability to calcification in normal porcine aortic valves. Circ Res. 2005;96:792–9.
Barakat AI, Davies PF. Mechanisms of shear stress transmission and transduction in endothelial cells. Chest. 1998;114:58S–63.
Davies PF, Tripathi SC. Mechanical stress mechanisms and the cell. An endothelial paradigm. Circ Res. 1993;72:239–45.
Ingber DE. Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction. Ann Med. 2003;35:564–77.
Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:63–73.
Butcher JT, Nerem RM. Valvular endothelial cells and the mechanoregulation of valvular pathology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1445–57.
Nahrendorf M, Jaffer FA, Kelly KA, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, Libby P, Weissleder R. Noninvasive vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 imaging identifies inflammatory activation of cells in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006;114:1504–11.
Davies MJ, Treasure T, Parker DJ. Demographic characteristics of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for stenosis: relation to valve morphology. Heart. 1996;75:174–8.
Balachandran K, Alford PW, Wylie-Sears J, Goss JA, Grosberg A, Bischoff J, Aikawa E, Levine RA, Parker KK. Cyclic strain induces dual-mode endothelial-mesenchymal transformation of the cardiac valve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:19943–8.
Paruchuri S, Yang JH, Aikawa E, Melero-Martin JM, Khan ZA, Loukogeorgakis S, Schoen FJ, Bischoff J. Human pulmonary valve progenitor cells exhibit endothelial/mesenchymal plasticity in response to vascular endothelial growth factor-a and transforming growth factor-beta2. Circ Res. 2006;99:861–9.
Wylie-Sears J, Aikawa E, Levine RA, Yang JH, Bischoff J. Mitral valve endothelial cells with osteogenic differentiation potential. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:598–607.
Hjortnaes J, Butcher J, Figueiredo JL, Riccio M, Kohler RH, Kozloff KM, Weissleder R, Aikawa E. Arterial and aortic valve calcification inversely correlates with osteoporotic bone remodelling: a role for inflammation. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1975–84.
Dweck MR, Chow MW, Joshi NV, Williams MC, Jones C, Fletcher AM, Richardson H, White A, McKillop G, van Beek EJ, Boon NA, Rudd JH, Newby DE. Coronary arterial 18f-sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1539–48.
Giachelli CM. Vascular calcification mechanisms. J Am Soc Nephrol: JASN. 2004;15:2959–64.
Aikawa E, Aikawa M, Libby P, Figueiredo JL, Rusanescu G, Iwamoto Y, Fukuda D, Kohler RH, Shi GP, Jaffer FA, Weissleder R. Arterial and aortic valve calcification abolished by elastolytic cathepsin s deficiency in chronic renal disease. Circulation. 2009;119:1785–94.
Hinton RB, Adelman-Brown J, Witt S, Krishnamurthy VK, Osinska H, Sakthivel B, James JF, Li DY, Narmoneva DA, Mecham RP, Benson DW. Elastin haploinsufficiency results in progressive aortic valve malformation and latent valve disease in a mouse model. Circ Res. 2010;107:549–57.
Helske S, Syvaranta S, Lindstedt KA, Lappalainen J, Oorni K, Mayranpaa MI, Lommi J, Turto H, Werkkala K, Kupari M, Kovanen PT. Increased expression of elastolytic cathepsins s, k, and v and their inhibitor cystatin c in stenotic aortic valves. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1791–8.
Zaheer A, Murshed M, De Grand AM, Morgan TG, Karsenty G, Frangioni JV. Optical imaging of hydroxyapatite in the calcified vasculature of transgenic animals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1132–6.
Fleisch H. Development of bisphosphonates. Breast Cancer Res BCR. 2002;4:30–4.
Kozloff KM, Volakis LI, Marini JC, Caird MS. Near-infrared fluorescent probe traces bisphosphonate delivery and retention in vivo. J Bone Miner Res: Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:1748–58.
Aikawa E, Nahrendorf M, Figueiredo JL, Swirski FK, Shtatland T, Kohler RH, Jaffer FA, Aikawa M, Weissleder R. Osteogenesis associates with inflammation in early-stage atherosclerosis evaluated by molecular imaging in vivo. Circulation. 2007;116:2841–50.
Rabkin-Aikawa E, Farber M, Aikawa M, Schoen FJ. Dynamic and reversible changes of interstitial cell phenotype during remodeling of cardiac valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;13:841–7.
Filip DA, Radu A, Simionescu M. Interstitial cells of the heart valves possess characteristics similar to smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1986;59:310–20.
Chester AH, Taylor PM. Molecular and functional characteristics of heart-valve interstitial cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1437–43.
Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Galli A, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani G. The myofibroblast: one function, multiple origins. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:1807–16.
Hutcheson JD, Chen J, Sewell-Loftin MK, Ryzhova LM, Fisher CI, Su YR, Merryman WD. Cadherin-11 regulates cell-cell tension necessary for calcific nodule formation by valvular myofibroblasts. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:114–20.
Hutcheson JD, Ryzhova LM, Setola V, Merryman WD. 5-ht (2b) antagonism arrests non-canonical tgf-beta1-induced valvular myofibroblast differentiation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53:707–14.
Mohler 3rd ER, Gannon F, Reynolds C, Zimmerman R, Keane MG, Kaplan FS. Bone formation and inflammation in cardiac valves. Circulation. 2001;103:1522–8.
New SE, Goettsch C, Aikawa M, Marchini JF, Shibasaki M, Yabusaki K, Libby P, Shanahan CM, Croce K, Aikawa E. Macrophage-derived matrix vesicles: an alternative novel mechanism for microcalcification in atherosclerotic plaques. Circ Res. 2013;113:72–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Sources of Funding
Dr. Aikawa is supported by grants from the National Institute of Health (R01HL114805; R01HL109506) and Harvard Catalyst Reactor Program.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hutcheson, J.D., Aikawa, E. (2015). Pathobiology and Optical Molecular Imaging of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. In: Aikawa, E. (eds) Cardiovascular Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09268-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09268-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09267-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09268-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)