Abstract
A breeding program involves several activities such as germplasm bank maintenance, evaluation of genetic diversity, selection of superior genotypes, progenitor’s selection, hybridization, and evaluation of segregating populations. These activities are necessary, in general, to develop new cultivars. A considerable number of researchers around the world are dedicated to Capsicum breeding programs. Their great challenge is to select high-yield cultivars resistant to pests and diseases, protect them against biotic and abiotic stresses, and improve their fruit quality, and ornamental potential, according to the purpose for use in industry or for fresh consumption. Market type, fruit or plant, has a number of traits that makes it commercially acceptable. Continuous breeding aimed at production and quality depends on the incorporation of new allelic forms into the new cultivars. To achieve their goals, breeders adopt the available breeding methods. In this chapter we further detail aspects of genetic variability, hybridization, genetic of quantitative traits, breeding methods, and postproduction of ornamental peppers showing the main results found by different groups of chili pepper breeders.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
4.1 Introduction
The first breeders of the genus Capsicum were the indigenous peoples of the Americas, who domesticated the Capsicum species (Heiser 1979) through selection, developing many types of the fruits that exist today, such as the peppers called jalapeño, serrano, and ancho.
In Brazil, C. baccatum, C. chinense, C. annuum, and C. frutescens are the species most commonly sold (Lannes et al. 2007; Rêgo et al. 2012a). The botanical varieties in Brazil are well known and receive different names from those of the extern international market, for example, Malaguetas, Malaguetinha, Malaguetão, or Malagueta-amarela (C. frutescens); pimenta-de-cheiro, pimenta-bode, Cumari-do-pará, Biquinho, or Murupi (C. chinense); Doce, Bola, or Cereja (C. annuum); Dedo-de-moça, Cambuci, Chapéu-de frade, or Chapéu-de-bispo (C. baccatum cv. pendulum); and Cumari (C. baccatum cv. bacctatum and C. baccatum cv. praetermissum; Casali and Couto 1984; Rêgo et al. 2012a), which are the types most commonly found in open markets to be consumed as fresh as dried spice. The most common cultivar of Pimenta-doce is Agronômico 11, with nonpungent, elongated fruits 18 cm in length (Casali and Couto 1984; Rêgo et al. 2012a). Cereja’s fruits are round and small and may or may not be pungent. Pimenta-de-mesa is the common name for dwarf colored plants for ornamental uses (Rêgo et al. 2009a).
The breeding of peppers has been performed via mass selection in African species, and, recently, some breeders have given emphasis to the use of hybridization in breeding programs (Tavares 1993; Geleta and Labuschagne 2004a; Patil and Salimath 2008; Rêgo et al. 2009b, 2012b, c, 2015a; Nascimento et al. 2014; Ferreira et al. 2015; Fortunato et al. 2015).
The great challenge today is to select high-yield cultivars resistant to pests and diseases, protect them against biotic and abiotic stresses, and improve their fruit quality, according to the purpose for use in industry or for fresh consumption. Peppers have a great breeding potential in terms of nutrition , because of their high content of vitamins A and C, carotenoids, and capsaicin. In recent years, peppers have stood out in the market of ornamental plants (IBPGRI 1983; Poulos 1994; Bosland and Votava 2003; Bontempo 2007; Rêgo et al. 2009a, b, 2011a; Barroso et al. 2012).
Each type of pepper, depending on market type, fruit or plant, has a number of traits that makes it commercially acceptable (Bosland and Votava 2003; Poulos 1994; Rêgo et al. 2009a, b; Table 4.1). Some traits are more difficult to manipulate than others, as is the case of pungency content (Zewdie and Bosland 2000, 2001).
To achieve their goals, breeders adopt available breeding methods . The breeding methods employed on autogamous plants, such as pepper, usually involve hybridization in the production of new sources of variability. In populations with high variability, on the other hand, selection-based methods may be utilized. For a breeding program to be successful, however, the breeders must know the genetics of the traits of interest and the compatibility within and between species (Allard 1971; Fehr 1987; Rêgo et al. 2009a, b, 2011a, 2012b, c, 2015b; Nascimento et al. 2014; Ferreira et al. 2015; Fortunato et al. 2015).
Continuous breeding aimed at production and quality depends on the incorporation of new allelic forms into the new cultivars. It is not yet known, however, which alleles will be useful in future commercial varieties until the need arises (Hancock 1992; Allard 1971; Fehr 1987; Nascimento et al. 2014). In the hybridization-based breeding methods, the selection of parents is a critical step. In general, parents are chosen based on their performance and on the complementarities among them (Allard 1971).
Another important factor to be taken into account in a breeding program is the available germplasm. Several countries of Latin America, among them Brazil, are considered to give top priority to the Capsicum germplasm collection (IBPGRI 1983).
The few Active Germplasm Banks of Capsicum in Brazil usually contain more varieties of domesticated species, although wild species are a source of resistance genes (Bianchetti and Carvalho 2005). The Active Germplasm Banks of pepper in Brazil belong to the Federal University of Paraíba (BAG-UFPB, Areia-PB), Federal University of Viçosa (BAG-UFV, Viçosa-MG), State University of Norte Fluminense (BAG-UENF, Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ), Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (BAG-IAC, Campinas-SP), and Embrapa Vegetables (Brasília-DF). In the following sections we further detail these aspects, showing the main results found by different research groups in Brazil and in the world.
4.2 Genetics
4.2.1 Genetic Variability
The first list of genes of the genus Capsicum contained 50 genes, and the rules of nomenclature and standardization of genes was determined by Lippert et al. (1965). Daskalov and Poulos (1994) and the Committee of Capsicum and Eggplant Newsletter expanded this list and described protocols for names and symbols. Recently, Wang and Bosland (2006) have conducted a review describing 292 genes for the genus.
Cytogenetic studies on the structure and morphology of chromosomes have been conducted by several authors since 1940, as seen in a previous chapter. The DNA content of the different species, however, was determined by Belletti et al. (1998).
The genetic variability of morphoagronomic traits, within and between accessions from the germplasm bank and of commercial varieties, has been the focus of many studies, for example, Inoue and Reifschneider (1989), Rêgo (2001), Rêgo et al. (2003), Sudré et al. (2005), Rêgo et al. (2011b, c), Nascimento et al. (2014), Silva Neto et al. 2014; Pessoa et al. 2015; and Nascimento et al. 2015; Rêgo et al. 2015a, b.
The phenotypic variability within the line, as a consequence of natural hybridization, is often found in elite lines in a breeding program or in released cultivars. The cross-pollination rate in the Capsicum species is not always known. In practice, it is easy to find contamination of sweet-pepper fields from the crossing with pungent peppers over generations of uncontrolled pollination. A way to prevent cross-pollination is to cover the plants individually with organza (Fig. 4.1) (Rêgo 2001), with fabric cages for more than one plant (Bosland 1993), or even glue the flower bud when it is in preanthesis (Fig. 4.2; Rêgo et al. 2012d).
4.2.2 Hybridization and Compatibility
Hybridization is an important factor in the evolution of plants as a source of new genetic combinations and as a mechanism of speciation. This procedure is also utilized to insert genes that provide desirable traits to cultivated plants (Cruz and Regazzi 1994; Gonçalves et al. 2011). According to Nascimento et al. (2012b), hybrids are, in general, more stable, uniform, and productive than cultivars from open pollination, for most traits.
Hybridization within pepper species , involving different types or cultivars, has not been explored much (Legg and Lippert 1966; Rêgo et al. 2009b). According to Rêgo et al. (2012d), among the factors contributing to the restriction of the use of hybridization in the breeding of Capsicum are the difficulty to handle the flowers and the low production of seeds per fruits. The steps for the manual crosses are shown in Fig. 4.3.
The hybridization between varieties of a same species, in general, produces the sufficient amount of seeds. Although some intraspecific crosses show a low percentage of fruit set, around 20 % (Nascimento et al. 2015a, b, c, d). Contrastingly, seeds originating from interspecific crosses are harder to obtain due to the incompatibility and/or incongruity of crosses (Bosland and Votava 2003; Costa et al. 2009; Rêgo et al. 2011d; Nascimento et al. 2012).
Nascimento et al. (2012) demonstrated that the cross between C. annuum and C. chinense has a varied fruit set rate (0–29 %). Costa et al. (2009) obtained crossing rates varying from 8.88 to 40 % between these two species. Nascimento et al. (2012) and Nascimento et al. (2015b) also demonstrated reciprocal effects on the fruit set rate of crosses and on the number of seeds formed, in intra- and interspecific crosses. Barroso et al. (2015) showed the importance of seed quality in the establishment and development of Capsicum plants. These authors highlighted low heritability values and epistatics effects for germination at 14 days. On the other hand Medeiros et al. (2015) found high heritability values of traits related to germination and only additive effects for seed germination in vitro.
4.2.3 Male Sterility
Male sterility (MS) was first described by Martin and Crawford (1951) and soon after by Peterson (1958), working with C. annuum. Male sterility is a trait of interest in the breeding of Capsicum, as it is easier to obtain hybrids due to the absence of viable pollen in the flower (Shifriss and Frankel 1969; Corrêa et al. 2007; Monteiro et al. 2011). Genetic male sterility (GMS) and cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) were described by Shifriss (1997). The former is determined by a series of recessive alleles (ms), which can interact with a plasma gene S (Shifriss 1973; Shifriss and Frankel 1969). More than a dozen MS alleles have been described. These are natural mutants, or obtained by mutagenesis (Shifriss 1997). Producing and maintaining a male-sterile line is a hard task and, thus, its use is limited (Daskalov and Mihailov 1988). These same authors studied the CMS. However, this system is unstable and can generate fertile pollen in some conditions (Shifriss and Frankel 1971). Fertility can be easily restored through backcrosses with one or both parents. Details on how to keep males sterile and restore fertility can be viewed in Shifriss (1997).
4.2.4 Maternal Effects, Heritability, and Combining Ability of Quantitative Traits in Capsicum
4.2.4.1 Maternal Effects
Rêgo (2001) performed analyses of reciprocal effects in Capsicum baccatum utilizing 28 hybrids and their reciprocals. These authors evaluated 14 fruit-quality and morphoagronomic traits and, based on the tests utilized, reciprocal effects were detected in all fruit and morphoagronomic traits. In contrast, no parent showed significant differences in more than 50 % of the crosses, which showed the importance of these maternal effects on these traits, except for pericarp thickness. According to Rêgo et al. (2009b), despite the existence of reciprocal effects, they may be considered irrelevant, in this species, especially in programs aimed at the generation of lines, because no reciprocal general combining ability (GCA) effect was detected. However, if the objective of the program is to obtain hybrids, these effects should be considered. Nascimento et al. (2015 b) stated that the intraspecific compatibility also varied with the directions of crosses. These authors showed the importance of the knowledge of the directions of crosses for the success in a hybrid breeding program.
4.2.4.2 Heritability and Combining Ability of Quantitative Traits
Some authors report the scarcity of research studies on narrow-sense heritability, in peppers, although estimates of broad-sense heritability have been well-studied for several traits (Poulos 1994; Sreelathakumary and Rajamony 2004; Hasanuzzaman et al. 2012; Silva et al. 2013).
Rêgo (2001) determined the presence of an epistatic effect on the following traits: total soluble solids, fruit dry matter, pericarp thickness, plant height, first bifurcation height, canopy diameter between plants, and yield. The additive-dominant model could be applied to the traits of major and minor fruit diameter, fruit length, fresh matter, and fruit fresh matter content, canopy width between rows, and fruit yield per plant. Sousa and Maluf (2003), however, detected epistatic effects also in the determination of seed yield per fruit. Anandhi and Khader (2011) found epistatic effects for the trait’s plant height, number of branches, fruit yield per plant, fruit length and diameter, seed yield per fruit, and green fruit yield per plant.
The knowledge of the combining ability of parents is a prerequisite in the direction of crosses aimed at production of good hybrids and lineages. The GCA is related to the additive genetic effects, whereas the specific combining ability (SCA) is related to the nonadditive genetic effects. Hybrid combinations with favorable SCA, good performance per se in the traits of interest, and which involve at least one parent with good GCA, are of interest in the plant breeding program (Kirsch and Miller 1991; Rêgo et al. 2009b; Nascimento et al. 2014; Ferreira et al. 2015).
The effects of GCA and SCA referring to 14 traits in the C. baccatum species were evaluated by Rêgo et al. (2009b), who demonstrated the importance of the additive and nonadditive effects on the expression of several quantitative traits. The traits of minor fruit width, soluble solids, pericarp thickness, first bifurcation height, plant height, canopy diameter between rows and between plants, and yield showed a prevalence of nonadditive genetic effects, which can be better explored in specific programs for hybrid production. A similar study was conducted by Nascimento et al. (2014) and Ferreira et al. (2015) in Capsicum annuum, in which the authors observed the significance of the CGA and SCA effects on all traits analyzed. Reciprocal effects were also observed by these authors, except for the traits of fruit length, pericarp thickness, placental length, and seed yield per fruit. Similar data were found by other authors with other species of the genus (Zambrano et al. 2005; Ahmed et al. 1999; Geleta and Labuschagne 2004a; Schuelter et al. 2010).
On the other hand, Sousa and Maluf (2003) determined that the nonadditive effects predominate in the production traits of fruit length/width ratio, fruit dry matter, production of capsaicin, and seed yield per fruit. For these same traits and also precocity traits (days to flowering and fructification), pericarp thickness, fruit yield, total soluble solids, and ascorbic acid content, Geleta and Labuschagne (2004b) determined the existence of dominance effects, which was also reported by Geleta et al. (2004). In addition, Rêgo et al. (2012b) determined dominance effects for days to flowering.
Rêgo et al. (2012b) determined that both the additive and the nonadditive genetic effects influence the plantlet and flower traits, except anther length. Ferreira et al. (2015) found predominant additive effects determining corolla length and number of stamens. Fortunato et al. (2015) also showed the predominance of additive effects for corolla length, petal width, and anther and style length.
For the traits in which the genetic additive effects predominate, it is suggested to utilize backcrossing or selection-based methods. For variables with predominance of nonadditive genetic effects, however, exploring the hybrid vigor may be a good strategy.
4.3 Breeding Methods
Several methods can be utilized in the development of a new cultivar. These should be determined by the breeder according to the objectives of the program and the existence of genetic variability in the basic population. The most widely used methods in the development of new Capsicum varieties are mentioned below.
4.3.1 Mass Selection
This method should be used for populations with genetic variability and selected in environments where the traits express themselves and for those of high heritability, inasmuch as selection is based on the phenotype.
In Brazil, this method has been used efficiently by the breeding groups of the Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), State University of Norte Fluminenese (UENF) , and Embrapa Vegetables.
4.3.2 Pedigree
This method is based on hybridization and involves the ancestry record of each plant selected within and between lines (Fehr 1987). The peppers BRS Sarakura and BRS Garça, adapted to Central Brazil, were developed by Embrapa Vegetables employing this method (Carvalho et al. 2009). Segregating generations F3, F4, and F5 are being evaluated and selected at UFPB for ornamental purposes by the genealogical method. Cultivar Ouro Negro, or UFPB2, was selected using this method.
4.3.3 Backcross
This method is effective when one aims at transferring one or a few genes. A successful case of its use was the transfer of virus resistance from the species C. chinense to C. frutescens (Greenleaf 1986). This method has been utilized efficiently to introduce genes of resistance to diseases.
4.3.3.1 Recurring Selection
This method involves interpopulation crossing for the formation of a new population base. It is used for the selection of quantitative traits of low heritability. Palloix et al. (1990a, b) utilized this method in the development of two lines of pepper (C. annuum) resistant to Verticillium dahliae and Phytophtora capsici.
4.3.4 SSD (Single Seed Descent )
This method involves the advance of generations without selection (Fehr 1987). Generation advance can be performed in greenhouses. Villalon (1986) utilized this method to fix recessive genes of resistance to potyvirus. Moreira et al. (2009) utilized this method to obtain lines resistant to bacterial spot and with high yield.
4.3.5 Mutation Breeding
This is not exactly a breeding method, but a way to generate new mutant alleles of interest. Mutants for pericarp color in pepper were successfully introduced chemically and by ionizing radiation, generating stable individuals through selection in subsequent generations (Bhargava and Umalkar 1989). Venkataiah et al. (2005) obtained, by chemical induction, mutants of C. praetermissum resistant to streptomycin. Chemical and physical mutagens have been utilized successfully in the generation of genetic variability for fruit and plant traits by the research group of the Federal University of Paraíba. Nascimento et al. (2015a) found different forms of fruit in mutated plants and determined the ideal ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS) and exposure time to obtain pepper mutants.
4.4 Correlations Among Traits
The knowledge of the association among traits is of great importance in breeding works, especially when the selection of one of them is difficult due to low heritability, or problems of measurement and identification. The simple correlation coefficients may not be completely informative as to the relationship between two variables, because the effects caused by other variables may be confusing these values. The partial correlation coefficient, which removes the effects of other traits on the studied association, and the path analysis, which deploys the correlation coefficient to direct and indirect effects on the basic variable, are auxiliary measures in the study of correlations. Rêgo et al. (2001) employed path analysis and partial correlations in the choice of selection strategies for 10 important traits in the breeding of pepper. For the path analysis, the trait yield was considered the basic variable. The variables of pericarp thickness, fruit length, plant height, and fruit yield per plant showed the highest partial correlation coefficients with yield (0.67, 0.77, 0.63, and 0.88, respectively), despite the low simple correlation coefficients (0.28, 0.14, 0.51, and 0.36, respectively). They also displayed the highest direct effects on the principal variable, indicating that pleiotropy and/or epistasis with genes, which control the other morphological variables, mask the effects of these traits on yield. Despite the low correlations, the direct effect is high; thus, the traits can be utilized in a selection index. The simple and partial correlation coefficients for the variables of major and minor fruit diameter, canopy width, first bifurcation height, and dry matter yield were low, and their effects on the principal variable have an indirect origin, via other variables, mainly pericarp thickness and plant height.
Utilizing path analysis in fruit traits, Silva et al. (2013) determined that the fruit dry matter is negatively correlated with pedicel and fruit lengths, fruit width, pericarp thickness, and average fruit weight.
Gains in yield can be achieved by selecting tall plants, with a higher fruit yield per plant, and longer fruits with a thicker pericarp. In this context, the use of selection indexes would be the most recommended strategy for the generation of new improved genotypes. If the objective is to select plants with fruits that have a greater dry matter content, plants bearing fruits with a smaller width should be selected.
4.5 Ornamental Peppers
The sale of ornamental plants in pots is becoming increasingly widespread; in general, more than that of cut flowers. In the ornamental pepper industry, the diversity of supply of new types opens new markets (Casali and Couto 1984; Rêgo et al. 2009b, 2011d). Among the ornamental plants grown in pots, the cultivation and search for peppers have increased, because they have a double purpose, especially when grown in pots or in gardens. The use of ornamental peppers for decoration and for consumption adds value to this product, increasing the financial return to the producer (Finger et al. 2012).
Ornamental peppers have had great prominence and good acceptance by the consumer market; they are popular in Europe and are gaining popularity in the United States. In Brazil, the sale of ornamental pepper is still restricted to street markets and some supermarkets, but the scenario has been changing, and consumers with higher purchasing power are already acquiring peppers at flower shops. This business is an important source of income to agricultural populations (Bosland et al. 1994). Family farming has been primarily responsible, in Brazil, for the expansion of the pepper-growing area in several states (Rêgo et al. 2011d).
Not every pepper cultivar adapts to cultivation in a pot, with variations present even within the same species (Fig. 4.4). Only those which show reduced plant size and harmony in the pot can be grown and marketed as ornamental plants. The traits of plant height, total height (heights of plant and pot), canopy width, and color and position of the fruit and flower are criteria utilized by consumers at the moment of purchase (Table 4.1) (Barroso et al. 2012; Nascimento et al. 2013).
To obtain good harmony, it is advisable that the ratio between plant height and canopy diameter, be 1.5–2 times the pot height or width, respectively (Barbosa 2003; Barroso et al. 2012). Pots with 900 mL capacity are often used successfully in the production of ornamental pepper (Fig. 4.5). Further research on the best containers and their dimensions is important, as they will influence the final production costs of ornamental peppers, so unnecessary expenses can be reduced.
4.6 Postproduction
Peppers are, in general, demanding plants in terms of temperature and, for this reason, in most pepper-growing regions of Brazil they are planted in the early spring. In regions of low altitude and mild winters, they can be cultivated all year round (Filgueira 2003). However, few studies have been carried out with ornamental peppers on production factors such as size, precocity, aging capacity in the pot, and postproduction factors such as sensitivity to ethylene, capacity to maintain photosynthesis under low- and high-luminosity conditions, and the use of inhibitors of the ethylene action to increase postproduction longevity in pots.
If there is too much ethylene in the circulating air (exhaust gases or ripe fruits), ethylene-sensitive flowers and plants will suffer wilting, bud drying, and abscission of leaf and fruits, among other problems (Woltering et al. 1996). However, the concentration of ethylene required to cause these effects depends on factors including time of exposure, temperature, developmental stage, and sensitivity of the species or variety (Hoyer 1996; Segatto et al. 2013).
The response of ornamental peppers to ethylene was studied by Segatto et al. (2013), who determined that after 48 h in the presence of 10 μL L−1 of ethylene, there was a significant difference in the chlorophyll contents in the different genotypes of C. annuum tested.
Rêgo (2015) (data not published) worked with five generations (parents, F1, F2, BC1, and BC2) treated for 6 h with 10 μL L−1 ethylene for 48 h and determined heritability for leaf and fruit abscission, allelic and gene effects, and correlation with morphoagronomic traits (Table 4.2). These authors determined the presence of overdominance and gene interaction for the trait leaf abscission in treated peppers (Table 4.2).
Nascimento et al. (2015 c) determined the existence of a high positive correlation between flower and fruit traits and leaf abscission caused by ethylene (Table 4.3). Plants more resistant to ethylene can be selected by selecting plants with smaller fruits with a thinner pericarp and lower dry matter content. These data were confirmed in the study of these authors who also determined that there is no correlation between fruit drop and leaf senescence after exposure to ethylene.
Santos et al. (2013) studied the sensitivity to ethylene in seven F2 populations of ornamental pepper and observed significant differences between the evaluated populations in leaf and fruit abscission (Table 4.4 and Fig. 4.6).
The resistant populations were selected and are being evaluated in the breeding program of the Federal University of Paraíba, in Areia-PB, Brazil, for ornamental purposes. In contrast, susceptible populations were selected to be utilized for the production of cut stem bouquets (Fig. 4.7).
Rêgo et al. (2009a) and Silva et al. (2009) demonstrated that the longevity of ornamental pepper in pots can vary from 13 to 72 days, after being subjected to simulated transport for 48 h, depending on the cultivar (Fig. 4.8).
4.7 Breeding for Ornamental Purposes
In general, the seeds from the ornamental varieties available in the Brazilian market are hybrids and the available cultivars are Gion red, pirâmide, espaguetinho ornamental, and grisu f-1 (Fabri 2008). There is a growing demand for new cultivars with colorful, attention-getting fruits and flowers that stand out in the foliage, with a small size and with postproduction quality.
In this regard, the Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB) has been developing, together with the Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), a breeding program of peppers for ornamental purposes with the following objectives: (1) to select pepper lines for family farmers; (2) to promote intra- and interspecific hybridization among the selected lines; (3) to advance generations through segregating populations; (4) to perform molecular analyses; and (5) to conduct studies of postproduction longevity. Many results have been obtained, such as selection of lines with a longer postproduction time (Rêgo et al. 2010), selection of ethylene-resistant lines (Santos et al. 2013), development of 290 hybrids of the Capsicum annuum species, and maintenance of segregating populations in a greenhouse (Rêgo et al. 2015a, b).
Eliza’s rainbow (UFPB 1) and Ouro Negro (UFPB 2): new cultivars of potgrown ornamental pepper.
Two new cultivars were obtained. Eliza’s rainbow (UFPB 1) was obtained through five cycles of mass selection with progeny testing, for three consecutive years, in a basic population of a cherry-like fruit of Capsicum baccatum chili pepper. Cultivar Ouro Negro (UFPB 2) was obtained by the genealogical method from the advancement of generations obtained by diallel crosses (Nascimento et al. 2012, 2014; Rêgo et al. 2012b, c). These segregating populations were evaluated for six consecutive cycles.
Cultivar Eliza’s rainbow presents anthocyanin in the stem, densely branched plants with medium density of green leaves, and green, erect fruits with anthocyanin spots, and four fruit-ripening stages with the colors beige, purple, orange, and red (Figs. 4.9 and 4.10). The flower is erect, white, and has green-yellowish spots in the corolla (Fig. 4.9b). The plant height values (49.24 cm) confirm its ornamental use as compared with the control cultivar (Calypso; Fig. 4.10). Cultivar Eliza’s rainbow (UFPB 1) is recommended both for use in gardens and in pots. All characterizations was done following the Capsicum descriptors (IPGRI, 1995).
Cultivar Ouro Negro has sparse, green foliage and erect fruits that are black when not ripe and yellow when ripe (Fig. 4.11). The values obtained for plant height (39 cm) confirmed its ornamental use. Cultivar Ouro Negro is only recommended for use in pots, because of its very small size (Rêgo et al. 2015a, b).
Both cultivars are in final evaluation trials for registration in the National Cultivar Registration Systems.
4.7.1 Ornamental Hybrids
Parallel to the development of new cultivars by mass selection and by the genealogical method, intraspecific hybrids of the Capsicum annuum species have been produced, and they are currently being evaluated in comparison with commercial cultivars (Fig. 4.12a, b). At present, 53 hybrids are being evaluated (Fig. 4.12b), aiming at use as ornamental pepper in pots, resistant to the action of ethylene, and for production of different populations (Figs. 4.13 and 4.14), which will be used as a basic population in the breeding of Capsicum with ornamental purposes.
References
Ahmed N, Tanki MI, Jabeen N (1999) Heterosis and combining ability studies in hot pepper Capsicum annuum L.). Appl Biol Res 1:11–14
Allard RW (1971) Princípios do melhoramento genético das plantas. Edgard Blucher, São Paulo, 381p
Anandhi K, Abdul Khader KM (2011) Gene effect of fruit yield and leaf curl virus resistance in interspecific crosses of chilli (Capsicum annuum L. and C. frutescens L.). J Trop Agric 49:107–109
Barbosa JG (2003) Crisântemo: produção de mudas, cultivo para corte de flor, cultivo em vaso, cultivo hidropônico. Ed.: Aprenda Fácil, 232p
Barroso PA, Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Nascimento KS, Nascimento NFF, Nascimento MF, Soares WS, Ferreira KTC, Otoni WC (2012) Analysis of segregating generation for components of seedling and plant height of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) for medicinal and ornamental purposes. Acta Hortic 953:269–275
Barroso PA, Dos S, Pessoa AM, Medeiros GDA, da Silva Neto JJ, Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM (2015) Genetic control of seed germination and physiological quality in ornamental pepper. Acta Hortic 1087:409–413
Belletti P, Marzachi C, Lanteri S (1998) Flow citometric measurement of nuclear DNA content in Capsicum (Solanaceae). Plant Syst Evol 209:85–91
Bhargava YR, Umalkar GV (1989) Productive mutations induced in Capsicum annuum by physical and chemical mutagens. Acta Hortic 253:233–238
Bianchetti L, Carvalho SIC (2005) Subsídios à coleta de germoplasma de pimentas e pimentões do gênero Capsicum (Solanaceae). In: Walter BMT, Cavalcanti TB (eds) Fundamentos para coleta de germoplasma vegetal. Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, pp 355–385
Bontempo M (2007) Pimenta e seus benefícios à saúde. Alade Editorial, São Paulo, 101p
Bosland PW (1993) Breeding for quality in Capsicum. Capsicum Eggplant Newsl 12:25–31
Bosland PW, Votava EJ (2003) Peppers: vegetable and spice capsicums. CABI, New York, 204p
Bosland PW, Iglesias J, Gonzalez MM (1994) ‘NuMex Centennial’ and ‘NuMex Twilight’ ornamental chiles. Hort Sci 29(9):10–90
Carvalho SIC, Bianchetti LDB, Reifschneider FJ (2009) Registro e proteção de cultivares pelo setor público: a experiência do programa de melhoramento de Capsicum da Embrapa Hortaliças. Hortic Bras 27(2):135–138
Casali VWD, Couto FAA (1984) Origem e botânica de Capsicum. Informe Agropecuário 10(113):8–10
Corrêa LB, Barbieri RL, Silva JB (2007) Caracterização da viabilidade polínica em acessos de Capsicum (Solanaceae). Revista Brasileira de Biociências Porto Alegre 5(suppl 1):660–662
Costa LV, Lopes R, Lopes MTG, Figueiredo AT, Barros WS, Alves SEM (2009) Cross compatibility of domesticated hot pepper and cultivated sweet pepper. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol, 9:181–186
Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ (1994) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. Imprensa Universitária, Viçosa, 378p
Daskalov SL, Mihailov L (1988) A new method for hybrid seed production based on cytoplasmic male sterility combined with a lethal gene and a female sterile pollenizer in Capsicum annuum L. Theor Appl Genet 76:530–532
Daskalov S, Poulos JM (1994) Updated Capsicum gene list. Capsicum Eggplant Newsl 13:16–26
Fabri EG (2008) Pimenta. Revista Globo Rural, N° 270, Editora Globo, Abril 2008
Fehr WR (1987) Principles of cultivar development: theory and technique, vol 1. Macmillan, New York, 736p
Ferreira KTC, Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Fortunato FLG, Nascimento NFF, De Lima JAM (2015) Combining ability for morpho-agronomic traits in ornamental pepper. Acta Hortic 1087:187–194
Filgueira FAR (2003) Novo manual de olericultura. Ed. UFV, 412p
Finger FL, Rêgo ER, Segatto FB, Nascimento NFF, Rêgo MM (2012) Produção e potencial de mercado para pimenta ornamental. Inf Agro 33(267):14–20
Fortunato FLG, Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Pereira dos Santos CA, Gonçalves de Carvalho M (2015) Heritability and genetic parameters for size-related traits in ornamental pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Acta Hortic (ISHS) 1087:201–206
Geleta LF, Labuschagne MT (2004a) Comparative performance and heterosis in single, three-way and double cross pepper hybrids. J Agric Sci 142:659–663
Geleta LF, Labuschagne MT (2004b) Hybrid performance for yield and other characteristics in peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). J Agric Sci 142:411–419
Geleta LF, Labuschagne MT, Viljoen CD (2004) Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on morphological traits and AFLP markers in pepper. Plant Breed 123:467–473
Gonçalves LSA, Rodrigues R, Bento CS, Robaina RR et al (2011) Herança de caracteres relacionados à produção de frutos em Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum com base em análise dialélica de Hayman. Rev Ciênc Agron 42:662–669
Greenleaf WH (1986) Pepper breeding. In: Basset MJ (ed) Breeding vegetable crops. AVI, Wesport, pp 69–127
Hancock JF (1992) Plant evolution and the origin of crop species. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 305p
Hasanuzzaman M, Hakim MA, Fersdous J, Islam MM et al (2012) Combining ability and heritability analysis for yield and yield contributing characters in chilli (Capsicum annuum) landraces. Plant Omics J 34:337–344
Heiser CB Jr (1979) Peppers—Capsicum (Solanaceae). In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longman, New York, pp 265–273
Hoyer L (1996) Critical ethylene exposure for Capsicum annuum “Janne” is dependent on an interaction between concentration, duration and developmental stage. J Hortic Sci 71(4):621–628
Inoue AK, Reifschneider FJB (1989) Caracterização da coleção de germoplasma de Capsicum do CNPH. Hort Bras 7(1)
International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (1983) Genetics resources of Capsicum, a global plan and action. IBPGR, Rome, 49p
International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (1995) Descriptors for capsicum. IPGRI, Rome, 49p
Kirsch M, Miller JF (1991) Measurement of genetic diversity among inbred sunflower germplasm lines. In: Sunflower research workshop, Fargo, pp 103–110
Lannes SD, Finger FL, Schuelter AR, Casali VWD (2007) Growth and quality of Brazilian accessions of Capsicum chinense fruits. Sci Hortic 112:266–270
Legg PD, Lippert LF (1966) Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in a cross between two strains of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Am Soc Hortic Sci Proc 89:443–448
Lippert LF, Bergh BO, Smith PG (1965) Gene list for the pepper. J Hered 56:30–34
Martin JA, Crawford JH (1951) Several types of sterility in Capsicum frutescens. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 57:335–338
Medeiros GDA, Rêgo ER, Barroso PA, Ferreira KTC, Dos S, Pessoa AM, Rêgo MM, Crispim JG (2015) Heritability of traits related to germination and morphogenesis in vitro in ornamental peppers. Acta Hortic 1087:403–408
Monteiro CES, Pereira TNS, Campos KP (2011) Reproductive characterization of interspecific hybrids among Capsicum species. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 11(3):241–249. ISSN 1984-7033
Moreira SO, Rodrigues R, Araújo ML, Sudréc P, Riva-Souza EM (2009) Desempenho agronômico de linhas endogâmicas recombinadas de pimenta em dois sistemas de cultivo. Ciência Rural 39(5):1387–1393
Nascimento NFF, Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Nascimento MF, Alves LIF (2012) Compatibilidade em cruzamentos intra e interespecíficos em pimenteiras ornamentais. Rev Bras Hort Ornamental 18(1):57–62
Nascimento NFF, Nascimento MF, Santos RMC, Bruckner CH, Finger FL, Rego ER, Rego MM (2013) Flower color variability in double and three-way hybrids of ornamental peppers. Acta Hortic 1000:457–464
Nascimento NFF, Rêgo ER, Nascimento MF, Bruckner CH, Finger FL, Rêgo MM (2014) Combining ability for yield and fruit quality in the pepper Capsicum annuum. Genet Mol Res 13:3237–3249
Nascimento KS, Rêgo MM, Nascimento AMM, Rêgo ER (2015a) Ethyl methanesulfonate in the generation of genetic variability in Capsicum. Acta Hortic 1087:357–363
Nascimento NFF, Nascimento MF, Rêgo ER, Lima JAM, Rêgo MM, Finger FL, Bruckner CH (2015b) Intraspecific cross-compatibility in ornamental pepper. Acta Hortic 1087:339–344
Nascimento MF, Rêgo ER, Nascimento NF, Santos R, Bruckner CH, Finger FL, Rêgo MM (2015c) Correlation between morphoagronomic traits and resistance to ethylene action in ornamental peppers. Hortic Bras 33(2):151–154
Nascimento MF, Nascimento NFF, Rêgo ER, Bruckner CH, Finger FL, Rêgo MM (2015d) Genetic diversity in a structured family of six generations of ornamental chili peppers (Capsicum annuum). Acta Hortic 1087:395–401
Palloix A, Daubese AM, Phaly T, Pochard E (1990a) Breeding transgressive lines of pepper for resistance to Phytophtora capsici in a recurrent selection system. Euphytica 51:141–150
Palloix A, Pochard E, Phaly T, Daubese AM (1990b) Recurrent selection for resistance to Varticillium dahlia in pepper. Euphytica 47:79–89
Patil SSA, Salimath PM (2008) Estimation of gene effects for fruit yield and its components in chili (Capsicum annuum L.). J Agric Sci 21(2):181–183
Pessoa AM, Rêgo ER, Barroso PA, Rêgo MM (2015) Genetic diversity and importance of morpho-agronomic traits in a segregating f2 population of ornamental pepper. Acta Hortic 1087:195–200
Peterson PA (1958) Cytoplasmically inherited male sterility in Capsicum. Am Nat 92:111–119
Poulos JM (1994) Pepper breeding (Capsicum spp.): achievements, challenges and possibilities. Plant Breed Abstracts 64(2):144–155
Rêgo ER (2001) Diversidade, herança e capacidade de análise combinatória em pimenta (Capsicum baccatum). UFV, Minas Gerais. Tese (Doutorado em Genética e Melhoramento de Plantas), Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Cruz CD, Finger FL, Amaral DSSL (2003) Genetic diversity analysis of peppers: a comparison of discarding variables methods. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 3(1):19–26
Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Silva DF, Cortez RM, Sapucay MJLC, Silva DR, Silva Junior SJ (2009a) Selection for leaf and plant size and longevity of ornamental peppers (Capsicum spp.) grown in greenhouse condition. Acta Hortic 829:371–375
Rêgo ER, Rego MM, Finger FL, Cruz CD, Casali VWD (2009b) A diallel study of yield components and fruit quality in chilli pepper (Capsicum baccatum). Euphytica 168:275–287
Rêgo ER, Silva DF, Rêgo MM, Santos RMC, Sapucay MJLC, Silva DR, Silva Júnior SJ (2010) Diversidade entre linhagens e importância de caracteres relacionados à longevidade em vaso de linhagens de pimenteiras ornamentais. Rev Bras Hort Ornamental 16:165–168
Rêgo ER, Finger FL, Rêgo MM (2011a) Types, uses and fruit quality of Brazilian chili peppers. In: Johnathan F (ed) Spices: types, uses and health benefits, vol 1. Nova Science, New York, pp 1–70
Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Matos IWF, Barbosa LA (2011b) Morphological and chemical characterization of fruits of Capsicum spp. accessions. Hortic Bras 29:364–371
Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Cruz CD, Finger FL, Casali VWD (2011c) Phenotypic diversity, correlation and importance of variables for fruit quality and yield traits in Brazilian peppers (Capsicum baccatum). Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:909–918
Rêgo ER, Finger FL, Nascimento MF, Barbosa LAB, Santos RMC (2011) Pimenteiras Ornamentais. In: Rêgo ER, Finger FL, Rêgo MM (eds) Produção, Genética e Melhoramento de Pimentas (Capsicum spp.), vol 1. Imprima, Recife, pp 205–223
Rêgo ER, Finger FL, Rêgo MM (2012a) Consumption of pepper in Brazil and its implications on nutrition and health of humans and animals. In: Salazar MA, Ortega JM (eds) Pepper: nutrition, consumption and health, vol 1. Nova Science, New York, pp 159–170
Rêgo ER, Fortunato FLG, Nascimento MF, Nascimento NFF, Rêgo MM, Finger FL (2012b) Inheritance of earliness in ornamental pepper (Capsicum annuum). Acta Hortic 961:405–410
Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Costa FR, Nascimento NFF, Nascimento MF, Barbosa LA, Fortunato FLG, Santos RMC (2012c) Analysis of diallel cross for some vegetative traits in chili pepper. Acta Hortic 937:297–304
Rêgo ER, Nascimento MF, Nascimento NFF, Santos RMC, Fortunato FLG, Rêgo MM (2012d) Testing methods for producing self-pollinated fruits in ornamental peppers. Hortic Bras 30:708–711
Rêgo ER, Rêgo MM, Finger FL (2015a) Methodological basis and advances for ornamental pepper breeding program in Brazil. Acta Hortic 1087:309–314
Rêgo MM, Sapucay MJLC, Rêgo ER, Araújo ER (2015b) Analysis of divergence and correlation of quantitative traits in ornamental pepper (Capsicum spp.). Acta Hortic 1087:389–394
Santos RMC, Rêgo ER, Nascimento MF, Nascimento NFF, Rêgo MM, Borém A, Finger FL, Costa DS (2013) Ethylene resistance in a F2 population of ornamental chili pepper (Capsicum annuum). Acta Hortic 501:433–438
Schuelter AR, Pereira GM, Júnior Amaral AT, Casali VWD (2010) Genetic control agronomically important traits of pepper fruit analyzed by Hayman’s partial diallel cross scheme. Genet Mol Res 9(1):113–117
Segatto FB, Finger FL, Rêgo ER, Pinto CMF (2013) Effects of ethylene on the post-production of potted ornamentals peppers (Capsicum annuum). Acta Hortic 1000:217–222
Shifriss C (1973) Additional spontaneous male-sterile mutantin Capsicum annuum L. Euphytica 22:527–529
Shifriss C (1997) Male sterility in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Euphytica 93:83–88
Shifriss C, Frankel R (1969) A new male sterility gene in Capsicum annuum L. J Am Soc Hort Sci 94:385–387
Shifriss C, Frankel R (1971) New sources of cytoplasmic male sterility in cultivated peppers. J Hered 64:254–256
Silva DF, Rêgo ER, Santos RMC, Sapucay MJLC, Silva DR, Rêgo MM (2009) Longevidade em vaso de linhagens de pimenteiras ornamentais. Hortic Bras 27: S2689–S2695
Silva Neto JJ, Rêgo ER, Nascimento MF, Silva Filho VAL, Almeida Neto JX, Rêgo MM (2014) Variabilidade em população base de pimenteiras ornamentais (Capsicum annuum L.). Rev Ceres, Viçosa, vol 61, no 1, pp 084–089, jan/fev 2014
Silva AR, Nascimento M, Cecon PR, Sapucay MJ, Ramalho do Rêgo E, Barbosa LA (2013) Análisis de ruta con multicolinealidad de las características de la fruta de la pimienta. Idesia 31(2):55–60
Sousa JAD, Maluf WR (2003) Diallel analyses and estimation of genetic parameters of hot pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.). Sci Agric 60(1):105–113
Sreelathakumary I, Rajamony L (2004) Variability, heritability and genetic advance in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). J Trop Agric 42(1–2):35–37
Sudré CP, Rodrigues R, Riva EM, Karasawa M (2005) Divergência genética entre acessos de pimenta e pimentão utilizando técnicas multivariadas. Hortic Bras 23:22–27
Tavares M (1993) Heterose e estimativa de parâmetros genéticos em um cruzamento dialélico de pimentão (Capsicum annuum L.). Tese (Mestrado). Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz—ESALQ, Piracicaba
Venkataiah P, Christopher T, Subhash K (2005) Induction and characterization of streptomycin-resistant mutants in Capsicum praetermissum. J Appl Genet 46(1):19–24
Villalon B (1986) Tambel-2 bell pepper. HortScience 21:328
Wang D, Bosland PW (2006) The genes of Capsicum. HortScience 41(5):1169–1187
Woltering EJ (1993) Effects of ethylene on ornamental pot plants: a classification. Sci Hortic 31:283–294
Yuen CMC, Hoffman H (1993) New capsicum varieties: storage suitability and consumer preference. Food Australia 45:184–187
Zambrano GM, Gonzalez JRA, Meraz MR, Loera AR, Campodonico OP (2005) Efectos genéticos y heterosis em la vida de anaquel Del Chile serrano. Ver Fitotec Mex 28(4):327–332
Zewdie Y, Bosland P (2000) Capsaicinoid inheritance in an interspecific hybridization of Capsicum annuum x C chinense. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 125(4):448–453
Zewdie Y, Bosland PP (2001) Combining ability and heterosis for capsaicinoids in Capsicum pubescens. HortScience 36(7):1315–1317
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramalho do Rêgo, E., Monteiro do Rêgo, M. (2016). Genetics and Breeding of Chili Pepper Capsicum spp.. In: Production and Breeding of Chilli Peppers (Capsicum spp.). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06532-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06532-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06531-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06532-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)