Abstract
The entry begins with a definition of biolaw and explains the passage from bioethics to biolaw.
In the first part, the article investigates the relationship between moral pluralism and biolaw, outlining the models and theories stemming from the theoretical debate, which precedes and lays the foundations for biolegislation and biojurisprudence. The different models of biolaw, the libertarian, the liberal, and the utilitarian model, are critically described, placing a particular emphasis on their neutral common perspective within the context of ethical pluralism. The personalist model of biolaw based on the recognition of human dignity in the human rights perspective is presented as opposed to the neutral perspective.
The second part of the article focuses on tracing the historical evolution of biolaw at the national and international levels. At the national level, emerging trends show prevalence in different legal systems, of either rights to freedom, to social convenience, or to the dignity of the human person, based upon the development of different biolegal models related to the single topics, within the context of moral pluralism, resulting in regulatory heterogeneity. At the international level, different regulation paths have been considered, with a view to achieving a global regulatory harmonization: codes of conduct drawn up by international organizations are mainly devoted to human experimentation; the sources of international biolaw, within the framework of governmental, nongovernmental, and regional international organizations (UNESCO, WHO), set forth general issues in the context of the relationship between bioethics and human rights or specific topics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andorno, R. (2009). Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34, 223–240.
Andorno, R. (2013). Principles of international biolaw: Seeking common ground at the intersection of bioethics and human rights. Geneve: Bruylant.
Barilan, Y. M. (2012). Human dignity, human rights, and responsibility: The new language of global bioethics and biolaw. New York: The MIT Press.
Beyleveld, D., & Brownsword, R. (2002). Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charlesworth, M. (2009). Bioethics in a liberal society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Convention for the protection of the human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention on human rights and biomedicine, Council of Europe, Oviedo, 1997
Charter of fundamental rights, European Union, Nice, 2000
Engelhardt, H. T. (1996). Foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Engelhardt, H. T. (2006). Global bioethics: The collapse of consensus. Huston: M & M Scrivener Press.
Macklin, R. (2003). Dignity is a useless concept. British Medical Journal, 327, 1419–1420.
Menikoff, J. (2001). Law and bioethics. An introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Palazzani, L. (2009). Introduction to the philosophy of biolaw. Rome: Studium.
Silvers, A. (1999). Disability, difference, discrimination: Perspectives on justice in bioethics and public policy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ten Have, H. A. M. J., & Gordijn, B. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of global bioethics (4 Vols.). Dordrecht: Springer.
van Beers, B., Corrias, L., & Werner, W. G. (Eds.). (2014). Humanity across international law and biolaw. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Further Readings
Foster, C. (2011). Human dignity in bioethics and law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Schroeder, D. (2005). Human rights and their role in global bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 14, 221–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Palazzani, L. (2014). Biolaw. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_53-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_53-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities