Abstract
Autonomy is a central principle in bioethics and research ethics. In this essay, a historical account of the moral and philosophical foundations for the principle of autonomy and its conceptualization in bioethical discourse is presented. An explanation on the application of autonomy in clinical practice and biomedical research by contextualizing it within a global bioethical framework is provided because the assumption of autonomy is that each person has the right and capacity to make her or his own decisions about medical procedures, treatment, and biomedical research. An examination of the challenges in the universality of the ethical concept of autonomy in bioethics is highlighted. The essay concludes with a summary of the major discussion points on autonomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beach, M. C., et al. (2007). What does respect mean? Exploring the moral obligation of health professionals to respect patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(5), 692–695.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994a). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bird, C. (1999). The myth of liberal individualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blackhall, L. J., Murphy, S. T., Frank, G., Michel, V., & Azen, S. (1995). Ethnicity and attitudes towards patient autonomy. Journal of American Medical Association, 274(10), 820–825.
Boggio, A., Zignol, M., Jaramullo, E., Nunn, P., Pinet, G., & Raviglione, M. (2013). Limitations on human rights: Are they justifiable to reduce the burden of TB in the era of MDR and XDR-TB. In: http://www.hhrjournal.org. Accessed 15 Feb 2015.
Bowman, K., Singer, P., & Richard, S. (2004). Chinese seniors’ perspectives on truth-telling. International Journal of Ethics, 3(4), 405–415.
Dunstan, G. (1994). Should philosophy and medical ethics be left to the experts? In S. Bewley & R. H. Ward (Eds.), Ethics in obstetrics and gynaecology. London: RCOG Press.
Hoffman, W. M., Frederick, R. E., & Schwartz, M. S. (2001). Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Klazinga, N. (1994). Compliance with practice guidelines: Clinical autonomy revisited. Health Policy, 28(1), 51–56.
Kushe, H., & Singer, P. (2013a). A companion to bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leung, W.-C. (2002). Why the professional-client ethic is inadequate in mental health care. Nursing Ethics, 9(1), 51–60.
Lysaught, M. T. (2004). Respect: Or how respect for persons became respect for autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29(6), 665–680.
Mappes, T.A., & DeGrazia, D. (eds.) (1996). Biomedical Ethics (4th edition), McGraw Hill.
NSW Health Department. (2005). Consent to medical treatment – Patient information. In http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au. Accessed 15 Feb 2015.
O’Neill,O. (2002a). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pantilat, S. (2008). Autonomy vs. beneficence. UCSF School of Medicine. Regents, University of California. In http://www.msinglink.ucsf.edu. Accessed 15 Feb 2015.
Pellegrino, E. D. (1994). Patient and physician autonomy: Conflicting rights and obligations in the physician-patient relationship. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy. 10(1). Available at: http://scholarship.law.edu/jchlp/vol10/iss1/8 Accessed 26 Jan 2014.
Secker, B. (1999) The appearance of kant’s deontology in contemporary kantianism: concepts of patient autonomy in bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 24(1), 43–66.
Skuter, P. (2012). When a health professional refuses: Legal and regulatory limits on conscientious objection to the provision of abortion care. Chapel Hill: IPAS.
Stiggelbout, A. M., Molewijk, A. C., Otten, W., Timmermans, D. R. M., van Bockel, J. H., & Kievit, J. (2004). Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: A study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 268–274.
Stirrat, G. M., & Gill, R. (2005). Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 127–130.
The Nuremberg Code from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10.Nuremberg. October 1946–April 1949. U.S. G.P.O. 1949–1953. Washington, DC.
Walter, J. K., & Klein, E. P. (2003). The story of bioethics: From seminal works to contemporary explorations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Further Readings
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994b). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kushe, H., & Singer, P. (2013b). A companion to bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mappes, T., & De Grazia, D. (2005). Biomedical ethics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
O’Neill,O. (2002b). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Manda-Taylor, L., Masiye, F., Mfutso-Bengo, J. (2015). Autonomy. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_460-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_460-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities