Abstract
Biological and chemical weapons are the only two weapon classes that are comprehensively banned as weapons of war by international law. The prohibition of biological and chemical weapons is said to be based on an ancient cross-cultural taboo against poison and disease weapons, which has now been codified in international law. However, moral and ethical reasons have also been used to justify research, development, and use of these weapons in the past and are being reused to undermine the modern norm against these weapons and threaten their reemergence. This entry looks at the arguments used to justify the use and development of chemical and biological weapons in light of a changing nature and character of organized violence and technological advances.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balmer, B. (2013). Secrecy and science: A historical sociology of biological and chemical warfare. London: Ashgate Publishing.
Ellis, J. (1986). The social history of the machine gun. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Gusterson, H. (1996). Nuclear rites: A weapons laboratory at the end of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Harris, R., & Paxman, J. (2002). A higher form of killing: The secret history of chemical and biological warfare. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks.
Jefferson, C. (2009). The taboo of chemical and biological weapons: Nature, norms and international law. D.Phil Dissertation, University of Sussex, Brighton.
Kaldor, M. (2006). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
Kirby, R. (2006). Paradise lost: The psycho agents. The CBW Conventions Bulletin, (71), 1–5.
National Research Council. (2011). Life sciences and related fields: Trends relevant to the biological weapons convention. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
OPCW. (2014). Convergence of chemistry and biology: Report of the Scientific Advisory Board’s Temporary Working Group. The Hague: OPCW.
Rappert, B., & McLeish, C. (2007). A web of prevention: Biological weapons, life sciences and the governance of research. London: Earthscan.
Robinson, J. (2009). Chemical and biological weapons. In N. E. Busch & D. H. Joyner (Eds.), Combating weapons of mass destruction (pp. 74–94). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Robinson, J. (2012). “Incapacitating chemical agents” in context: an historical overview of states policy Expert Meeting “Incapacitating Chemical Agents” Law enforcement, Human Rights Law, and Policy Perspectives. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.
Sims, N. R. A. (2001). The evolution of biological disarmament. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
van Wynen Thomas, A., & Thomas, A. J., Jr. (1970). Legal limits on the use of chemical and biological weapons. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.
World Health Organization. (2004). Public health response to biological and chemical weapons – WHO guidance (2nd ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.
Further Readings
Guillemin, J. (2005). Biological weapons: From the invention of state-sponsored programs to contemporary bioterrorism. New York/Chichester: Columbia University Press.
Rappert, B., & McLeish, C. (2007). A web of prevention: Biological weapons, life sciences and the governance of research. London: Earthscan.
Tucker, J. B. (2012). Innovation, dual use, and security: Managing the risks of emerging biological and chemical technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
ilchmann, K. (2015). Weapons. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_441-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_441-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities