Skip to main content

Sexual Ethics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 260 Accesses

Abstract

There can be no doubt that sexuality is one of the most powerful forces operative in human experience. While sex facilitates the process of reproduction, in human existence sex has developed into considerably more than this. Sex also represents one of the fundamental drives that constitute human behavior. In as far as ethics is the outcome of reflection on the rightness or wrongness and goodness or badness of all human behavior, sex has since the earliest origins of our culture been a theme of consistent moral deliberation, regulation, and even legislation. This entry firstly outlines aspects of the history of reflection on sexual matters. The approach in terms of natural law (also inspired by religious concerns) is discussed, leading up to the approaches of St. Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century and Immanuel Kant in the eighteenth century, as well as the Victorian guilt morality that dominated the nineteenth and the earlier twentieth centuries. Following this, the liberalized understanding of and reflection on sex, mainly precipitated in the second half of the twentieth century in the aftermath of the Second World War, receive attention. In the third section of the entry, a brief conceptual clarification of the term “sexual activity” is offered in light of the conceptual difficulties that a proper understanding of this term has yielded. The final part of the entry explores the way in which the understanding and practice of, as well as the reflection on, human sexuality have changed. The differences between St. Thomas Aquinas’s and Thomas Nagel’s notions of “sexual perversion” serve as the point of departure. The entry concludes with an emphasis on the role of sex in the understanding and practice of intimate human relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augustine. (2009). On marriage and concupiscence (Book I) (trans: Holmes, P., Wallis, R. E., & Warfield, B. B.). In P. Schaff & K. Knight (Eds.), Nicene and post-Nicene fathers, first series (Vol. 5). Retrieved from http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/15071.htm. Accessed 22 April 2015.

  • Freeman, C. (2002). The closing of the western mind. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (1997). Sex and sexual perversion. In A. Soble (Ed.), The philosophy of sex (3rd ed., pp. 57–66). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1948). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (trans: Paton, A. J.). New York: HarperTorch Books. (Original work published 1785).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1951). The symposium (trans: Hamilton, W.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1961). Timaeus (trans: Jowett, B.). In E Hamilton & H Cairns (Eds.), Plato: The collected dialogues (pp. 1151–1211). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, S. A., & Reinisch, J. M. (1999). Would you say you “had sex” if…? JAMA, 281(3), 275–277. doi:10.1001/jama.281.3.275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J. P. (1969). Being and nothingness (trans: Barnes, H. E.). London: Methuen. (Original work published 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (1986). Sexual desire: A philosophical investigation. London: Phoenix Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, I. (1984). The nature of love. Vol. 2: Courtly and romantic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soble, A. (n.d.). Philosophy of sexuality. In The internet encyclopedia of philosophy: A peer-reviewed academic resource. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/sexualit/print. Accessed 22 April 2015.

Further Readings

  • Baker, R. B., Wininger, K. J., & Elliston, F. A. (Eds.). (1998). Philosophy and sex (3rd ed.). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. (1993). Love & friendship. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primoratz, I. (1999). Ethics and sex. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soble, A. (Ed.). (1980). The philosophy of sex: Contemporary readings. New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton van Niekerk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

van Niekerk, A. (2015). Sexual Ethics. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_393-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_393-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics