Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease with a variable prevalence ranging from 5 % in the Eastern population to 25 % in the West. Moreover, GERD incidence seems to be escalating.
Gastroesophageal reflux occurs daily in normal individuals (physiological reflux); however, it may become “a disease which develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications” – or GERD – as defined by an International Consensus.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease
- Pathophysiology
- Acid reflux
- Non-acid reflux
- Esophageal manometry
- Ambulatory pH
Introduction
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease with a variable prevalence ranging from 5 % in the Eastern population to 25 % in the West. Moreover, GERD incidence seems to be escalating.
Gastroesophageal reflux occurs daily in normal individuals (physiological reflux); however, it may become “a disease which develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications” – or GERD – as defined by an International Consensus.
Gastric hydrochloric acid has long been recognized as harmful to the esophagus; however, the gastroesophageal refluxate contains a variety of other noxious agents, including bile, pancreatic enzymes, and pepsin.
GERD pathophysiology is multifactorial and linked to a disbalance between the aggressiveness of the refluxate into the esophagus or adjacent organs and the failure of the esophagogastric barrier and protective mechanisms. This chronic pathologic backflow of gastroduodenal contents leads to a spectrum of symptoms, with or without tissue damage. The degree of the disease gravity depends on the frequency, duration, and quality of the exposure of the refluxate into the esophagus or adjacent organs.
This chapter reviews GERD pathophysiology.
Antireflux Mechanisms
The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) area has a specialized valve mechanism formed by the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and abdominal esophagus, the diaphragm, the angle of His, the Gubaroff valve, and the phrenoesophageal membrane (Fig. 3.1).
Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Abdominal Esophagus
The LES creates a high-pressure zone at the level of the EGJ without a clear anatomic representation. This smooth muscle sphincter maintains a sustained tone that is disrupted only in two moments: (1) swallowing, to allow food transit to the stomach, and (2) gastric fundus distention, to allow gas ventilation and eructation.
An effective LES must have an adequate resting pressure and total and intra-abdominal length. It is intuitive that the resting pressure of the LES must be higher than the thoracoabdominal pressure gradient. Also, reflux control is linked to the extension of the LES, since gastric distension may alter the shape of the proximal stomach leading to a shorter LES. Moreover, the intra-abdominal portion of the LES is submitted to a positive abdominal pressure that forces the sphincter to collapse and close. The same mechanism applies to the presence of an abdominal portion of the esophagus, not found in a hiatal hernia (HH).
Even though most patients with GERD have a defective LES, a normal LES pressure does not exclude GERD, since the pathophysiology may be linked to abnormal relaxations.
Periodic relaxation of the LES or transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) – to distinguish it from relaxation triggered by swallowing – explains physiological reflux found in normal subjects.
This relaxation is longer, and it is associated to diaphragm inhibition and contraction of the longitudinal muscular layer of the esophagus, when compared to swallow-induced relaxations (Fig. 3.2). It may contribute to reflux disease, when more frequent and prolonged. It explains the reflux seen in the 40 % of patients with GERD whose resting LES pressure is normal.
Diaphragm
The esophagus crosses from the thorax to the abdomen through the esophageal hiatus formed by the right crus of the diaphragm. Thus, the esophagus is compressed during diaphragm contraction. The crus of the diaphragm provides an extrinsic component to the gastroesophageal barrier. This pinchcock action of the diaphragm is particularly important as a protection against reflux induced by sudden increases in intra-abdominal pressure.
Very interestingly, high-resolution manometry is able to show the distinct action of the diaphragm in patients with hiatal hernia (Fig. 3.3), and a high pressure zone is observed at this level even in patients after distal esophagectomy when the LES was resected.
Angle of His and Gubaroff Valves
The acute angle formed between the esophagus and the gastric fundus (His angle) creates a longer distance between the gastric fundus where the food is stored during feeding. Also, gastric distention projects the fundus in the direction of the esophagus accentuating the His angle and closing the EGJ (Fig. 3.4).
Gubaroff valves consisted in a cushion action of the distal esophageal mucosa at the level of the EGJ.
Phrenoesophageal Membrane
The phrenoesophageal membrane is a fibroelastic ligament consisting in the continuation of the transversalis fascia that leaves the diaphragm and surrounds the esophagus in a variable distance from the abdominal inlet. The membrane protects against reflux transmitting the positive abdominal pressure above the abdominal inlet into the esophageal walls. This effect creates a segment of the esophagus that is anatomically in the thorax but physiologically behaves like an abdominal segment (Fig. 3.5).
Protective Mechanisms
Some mechanisms protect the esophagus from injury when a reflux occurs.
Esophageal Clearance
The refluxate is likely to produce more mucosal injury if the contact time with the mucosa is prolonged. A rapid esophageal clearance minimizes the effect of the refluxate. Esophageal clearance is promoted by gravity, esophageal motility, and saliva production.
Esophageal Motility
Esophageal peristalsis is probably the most important component of the esophageal clearance of the refluxate. Thus, defective peristalsis is associated with more severe GERD with a higher intensity of symptoms and mucosal damage.
Saliva Production
The daily output of saliva is over 1 l. It has a dual protection effect on the esophagus: (1) mechanical, as it washes out the refluxate, and (2) chemical, as it buffers acid reflux due to the presence of bicarbonate.
Epithelial Protection
Esophageal epithelial cells have protective mechanisms against the noxious effects of reflux. These mechanisms may be divided in pre-epithelial, epithelial, or post-epithelial.
Esophageal mucus, produced by mucus cells localized at the epithelium surface and from the submucosal glands, acts as a pre-epithelial barrier against the refluxate. Under the mucus, a layer of bicarbonate-rich fluid also buffers acid that penetrates the mucus.
Esophageal epithelial cells have specialized cellular membranes and intercellular junctions to prevent H+ ions to flow into the cells.
The post-epithelial protective mechanism is performed by the clearance of H+ ions to the blood.
Thoracoabdominal Gradient
The esophagus is placed in almost its totality in the thorax under a negative pressure. This promotes the upward extension of gastric contents. On the other side, the stomach lies within the positive pressure of the abdomen, compressing its walls and also forcing contents upwards. This thoracoabdominal gradient must be counterbalanced by the valve mechanism previously described, interposed between the esophagus and the stomach. An increase in abdominal (intragastric) pressure or a decrease in thoracic pressure (becoming more “negative”) may alter this and lead to GERD (Fig. 3.6).
Obesity is probably the main cause for GERD due to increased abdominal pressure. It has been shown that there is a dose-response relationship between increasing body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of GERD and its complications. Abnormal gastric emptying might also contribute to GERD by increasing intragastric pressure.
The association of various pulmonary diseases and GERD has been demonstrated. It has been shown that patients with end-stage lung disease may have a prevalence of GERD in up to 70 %.
Others
Age
Although GERD symptoms are distributed equally in different ages, the prevalence and severity of GERD increase with aging. This fact may be attributed to decrease in the esophageal motility, decrease in the production of saliva, and a higher incidence of hiatal hernias.
Helicobacter pylori
Helicobacter pylori might influence GERD by leading to an atrophic gastritis and consequent achlorhydria, altering the nature of the refluxate. Some studies showed an inverse association between H. pylori infection and reflux esophagitis and increase in GERD symptoms after eradication of the bacteria. However, studies on the topic are not unanimous and the real interaction between GERD and H. pylori is still elusive.
Drugs, Diet, and Hormones
Many substances may alter the lower esophageal sphincter function and promote GERD (Table 3.1).
Hiatal Hernia
Hiatal hernia and GERD were considered synonyms in the past. Currently, it is well known that both conditions can exist independently; however, the presence and size of a hiatal hernia increase the chance of GERD by disrupting most of the natural antireflux mechanisms (Fig. 3.7). The presence and size of a hiatal hernia are also associated with more severe mucosal damage and increased acid exposure.
Conclusions
GERD is a multifactorial disease, and there is a great interaction among causative factors (Fig. 3.8). Patients with suspected GERD must be carefully studied, and therapy should be based on the pathophysiology of the disease.
Summary
-
GERD is defined as a condition which develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications.
-
Gastroesophageal reflux occurs daily in normal individuals.
-
GERD pathophysiology is multifactorial and linked to a disbalance between the aggressiveness of the refluxate into the esophagus or adjacent organs and the failure of the esophagogastric barrier and protective mechanisms.
-
Antireflux mechanisms include the lower esophageal sphincter and abdominal esophagus, the diaphragm, the His angle, the Gubaroff valve, and the phrenoesophageal membrane.
-
Protective mechanisms include esophageal motility, saliva production, and epithelial protection.
-
Age, drugs, hormones, Helicobacter pylori infection, increased abdominal pressure (especially obesity and delayed gastric emptying), a more negative thoracic pressure, and the presence of hiatal hernia all affect GERD.
Selected Reading
Armstrong D. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005;5:589–95. This paper highlights the symptoms and their relationship to the anatomical and physiological changes of the mechanisms that prevent GERD.
Armstrong D, Sifrim D. New pharmacologic approaches in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010;39:393–418. This paper discusses the mechanisms of GERD with emphasis on the LES and substances (pharmaceutical and food) that can change its pressure.
Bredenoord AJ, Pandolfino JE, Smout AJPM. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet. 2013;381:1933–42. This review focuses on the aspects of the esophagogastric junction dysfunction through manometry and pH monitoring.
Cram M. Hiatus hernia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Medicine. 2010;39(3):132–6. Review on the relationship between hiatal hernia and GERD.
Fass R. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(3):S2–7. This manuscript covers all etiopathogenic aspects of GERD. It states that there are subgroups of patients with distinct mechanisms in the pathophysiology of the disease.
Herbella FA, Sweet MP, Tedesco P, Nipomnick I, Patti MG. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity. Pathophysiology and implications for treatment. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(3):286–90. This study elucidates on the relationship between obesity and GERD, focusing on the etiopathogenic aspects.
Hom C, Vaezi MF. Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:71–91. Review on extra-esophageal manifestations of GERD and on the aggressive and defensive factors in the pathogenesis of GERD.
Kahrilas PJ, Lee TJ. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005;15:323–33. Review paper that shows the relationship between antireflux mechanisms and severity of GERD.
Lee YY, McColl KEL. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;27:339–51. Review paper on the normal physiology of the antireflux barrier.
Orlando RC. Pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002;31:33–44. Review paper with comments on the transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and on esophageal clearance. It focuses on the evolution from GER to GERD.
Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. The pathophysiologic basis for epidemiologic trends in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin Notrth Am. 2008;37:827–43. This paper focuses on relationship between GERD pathophysiology and epidemiology, focusing on the potential risk factors for GERD.
Patti MG, Perreta S. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a decade of changes. Asian J Surg. 2003;26(1):4–6. The authors report that in the last decade there have been changes in the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of GERD.
Salvatore S, Vandenplas Y. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease and motility disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;17(2):163–79. Relevant paper on esophageal motility. Discusses the epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiology and esophageal motility, focusing on the differences between different age groups.
Shafik A, Shafik I, El-Sibai O, Shafik AA. On the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux: the concept of gastroesophageal dyssynergia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:401–7. Importance of the diaphragm.
Weijenborg PW, Bredenoord AJ. How reflux causes symptoms; reflux perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;27:353–64. Volume and composition of refluxate as being important for the perception of symptoms.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valezi, A.C., Herbella, F.A.M., Junior, J.M. (2014). Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Pathophysiology. In: Fisichella, P., Allaix, M., Morino, M., Patti, M. (eds) Esophageal Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04337-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04337-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04336-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04337-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)