Abstract
Throughout its history, science has benefited from contributions made by amateurs, but since the creation of Internet an increasing number of important projects have recruited large numbers of ordinary people to their teams, in what is now called citizen science. Prominent examples include Galaxy Zoo in which volunteers annotate photographs of distant galaxies and eBird in which bird watchers systematically document their observations out in the field. This phenomenon has become sufficiently extensive that several experts have offered typologies for classifying projects, establishing citizen science as a new research field in its own right. Among the implications for general science and technology convergence is the fact that the nature of expertise may shift, offloading much of the detailed technical knowledge onto information systems, and clarifying theoretical concepts, motivated by the need to integrate into the community many nonscientists, but in consequence also making it easier for a scientist in one field to participate in another. Consideration of citizen social science illuminates how citizen science more generally can facilitate convergence of science with society, guided by fundamental research on how science is understood by nonspecialists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagozzi RP, Dholakia UM (2006) Open source software user communities: a study of participation in Linux user groups. Manag Sci 52(7):1099–1115
Bainbridge WS (1994a) Scientific nomenclature. In: Asher RE, Simpson JMY (eds) The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 3685–3690
Bainbridge WS (1994b) Technological nomenclature. In: Asher RE, Simpson JMY (eds) The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 4536–4541
Bainbridge WS (2006) Transformative concepts in scientific convergence. In: Bainbridge WS, Roco MC (eds) Progress in convergence: technologies for human wellbeing. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 24–45
Bainbridge WS (2014) Personality capture and emulation. Springer, London
Bodenreider O (2004) The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D267–D270
Bowser A, Shanley L (2013) New visions in citizen science. Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington, DC
Conway MA (ed) (1997) Cognitive models of memory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Cooper CB, Dickenson J, Phillips T, Bonney R (2007) Citizen science and a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc 12(2):11
Crowne DP, Marlow D (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol 24:349–354
Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, New York
Fitzgerald J, Gottschalk P, Moffitt R (1998) An analysis of sample attrition in panel data: the michigan panel study of income dynamics. J Hum Resour 33(2):251–299
Hennig W (1979) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF (1955) Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press, Glencoe
Lee GK, Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: the case of the Linux kernel development. Organ Sci 14(6):633–649
Lintott C, Schawinski K, Bamford S et al (2011) Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies. Mon Not R Astron Soc 410(1):166–178
Manning PK, Fabrega H Jr (1976) Fieldwork and the “New ethnography.”. Man 11(1):39–52
Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S & Crowston K (2012) The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6), 298–304
Orne MT (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Ame Psychol 17(11):776–783
Prestopnik NR, Crowston K (2012) Citizen science system assemblages: understanding the technologies that support crowdsourced science. In: Proceedings of the 2012 i conference. ACM, New York, pp 168–176
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2003) Converging technologies for improving human performance. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Rutherford FJ, Ahlgren A (1990) Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York
Shirk JL, Ballard HL, Wilderman CC, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Jordan R, McCallie E, Minarchek M, Lewenstein BV, Krasny ME. & Bonney R (2012) Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society 17(2), 29
White RW (1952) Lives in progress. Dryden Press, New York
White HC (1970) Chains of opportunity: system models of mobility in organizations. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Wiggins A, Crowston K (2011) From conservation to crowdsourcing: a typology of citizen science. In: proceedings of the forty-fourth Hawai’i international conference on system science. IEEE, New York
Wood C, Sullivan B, Iliff M et al (2011) eBird: engaging birders in science and conservation. Public Libr Sci Biol 9(12):e1001220
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA)
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bainbridge, W.S. (2015). Citizen Science. In: Bainbridge, W., Roco, M. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04033-2_26-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04033-2_26-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04033-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Citizen Science- Published:
- 08 September 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04033-2_26-2
-
Original
Citizen Science- Published:
- 20 June 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04033-2_26-1