Abstract
The Earth experienced dramatic transformations during the Cenozoic, with changing sea levels, climate, and tectonic events having major influences on the global biota. In South America, loss of the connection between Patagonia and Antarctica, Andean orogeny, and formation of the Isthmus of Panama defined the continent, as we know it today. These events had enormous effects on local faunas, with major consequences for their evolution and extinction. The Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI), a major natural experiment in biotic reorganization, was either enabled or at least greatly enhanced by land connections between North and South America during the late Neogene. The outcome of the meeting of previously separated biotas was a drastic change, both for the composition of South American faunas and the terrestrial ecosystems they inhabited.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
2.1 Historical Factors: An Overview
The faunal and floral communities of South America experienced strong climatic, tectonic, and geographic changes during the Cenozoic. These historical causal factors profoundly affected the evolution of South American terrestrial ecosystems during the past 66 Ma. In this chapter, we review key aspects of South American geological history during the Cenozoic, focusing on those features that likely had the greatest influence on the environment and fauna. This chapter is a summary of major patterns of tectonic, climatic, geographic, environmental, and faunal change as they occurred in South America. As part of our scope, we include evaluations of controversies concerning the timing of the establishment of the Panamanian land bridge and the chronology of the GABI.
2.1.1 Geography and Climate—from Greenhouse to Icehouse
At the beginning of the Cenozoic, South America was separated from North America by a major seaway, but still connected to Antarctica and (at a further remove) Australia. Temperatures were warm worldwide, a persistence of greenhouse conditions from the close of the Mesozoic. The terminal late Paleocene–early Eocene (~59 to ~52 Ma) was a period of unusual warmth even by the standards of previous eras. Global temperatures and atmospheric greenhouse gas levels were higher than they have been at any other point in the past 65 Ma (Fig. 2.1). This hyperthermal period, known as the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum (PETM), peaked at ~52–50 Ma, with the early Eocene climatic optimum (EECO) (Woodburne et al. 2014a, b).
By the early Eocene, global surface ocean currents were warm, with saline concentrations similar to those at depth. Equatorial waters circulated with those of the South Pacific and South Atlantic, keeping ocean temperatures uniform between high and low latitudes (Fig. 2.2).
The EECO was followed by a long trend toward cooler conditions from 50 to 34 Ma. This cooling event peaked at the Eocene–Oligocene Boundary (~34 Ma), and the world then began to change from greenhouse to icehouse (Fig. 2.1). Ice sheets previously present at higher altitudes in the Antarctic expanded, ushering in the first major Cenozoic glaciation on that continent (Oi-1 Glaciation). Temperatures declined 7 °C in deep seas (from ~12 to ~4.5 °C) (Zachos et al. 2001; Reguero et al. 2013), and significant temperature gradients appeared from the equator to the poles.
The sea floor between Antarctica and Australia started forming by the middle/early late Eocene. By the early Oligocene (~32 Ma), ocean depth permitted deep-water communication between the Pacific and Indian Oceans, setting the stage for the development of a major Antarctic ice cap and the largest Cenozoic sea level drop (~30 Ma; Haq et al. 1987). The current oceanic configuration was complemented by the opening of the Drake Passage. The precise timing of the separation of Antarctica and South America is difficult to establish. The evidence indicates that by the late Oligocene (~24 Ma; Pfuhl and McCave 2005), the deep-water connection between the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans was fully established. However, studies based on seafloor magnetic anomalies indicated that a shallow-water opening (<1000 m deep) was present as early as ~50 Ma (early Eocene; Livermore et al. 2007; see also Scher and Martin 2006; Reguero et al. 2013). This configuration resulted in the formation of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), a clockwise current flowing around Antarctica (Fig. 2.2) that thermally isolated the continent for the remainder of the Cenozoic and profoundly influenced worldwide climate.
The Eocene–Oligocene boundary is marked by biotic changes on a global basis, including major diversification/extinction and immigration/emigration events (Prothero 1994; Sluijs et al. 2007; Wing et al. 1995). In Europe, this episode was recognized by the Swiss paleontologist Hans Stehlin as “La Grande Coupure,” or the great break, in what was perceived as previous long-term faunal continuity. Similar faunal reorganizations were later recognized for North America by Henry F. Osborn (Prothero 1994), Asia with the concept of the “Mongolian Remodeling” (Meng and McKenna 1998), and South America with the “Patagonian Hinge,” based on an abrupt change within metatherian-dominated associations in Patagonia (Goin et al. 2010, 2016).
Climatic deterioration at the start of the Oligocene and the formation of semipermanent ice sheets in Antarctica persisted until the late Oligocene (26–27 Ma; Zachos et al. 2001), when a warming trend reduced Antarctic ice cover. Another hypothermal peak is recorded in the early Miocene (Mi-1 Glaciation). From this point onward until the middle Miocene, warmer conditions prevailed. Global ice volume remained low, and bottom water temperatures trended slightly higher. This warm phase peaked in the middle Miocene (~17 to ~15 Ma) with the middle Miocene climatic optimum (MMCO) (Fig. 2.1). Global temperatures gradually decreased once more, with the initiation of the modern phase of Antarctic glaciation, reestablishing permanent ice cover by 10 Ma (Zachos et al. 2001). Global temperatures decreased gradually through the late Miocene until the early Pliocene (6 Ma), with additional cooling and ice sheet expansion in West Antarctica and the Arctic.
The early Pliocene is marked by a subtle warming trend until ~3.2 Ma when temperatures abruptly decreased, marking the onset of Northern Hemisphere Glaciation (NHG). Since then, temperature curves show contrasting peaks and valleys, correlated with the pattern of repeated glaciations and interglaciations that characterize the Ice Ages of the last 2.6 Ma. The amplitude of these changes greatly increased at the beginning of the Middle Pleistocene 0.7 Ma (Zachos et al. 2001). This event has been previously correlated with the completion of the Isthmus of Panama (but see below) and consequent changes in oceanic circulation (Fig. 2.3). Closure of the seaway between the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans enhanced the Gulf Stream, the warm Atlantic current that passes from the Gulf of Mexico along the North American Atlantic seaboard before departing for northern Europe. Enhanced production of water vapor from evaporation of the warm waters of the Gulf Stream triggered increased snowfall in Europe, Asia, and North America and the consequent formation of thick snow cover (Haug and Tiedemann 1998).
In Patagonia, glaciations had begun to occur in the southern Andes (Santa Cruz Province) by the late Miocene–early Pliocene ~7–4.4 Ma (Rutter et al. 2012). After this, 15 successive expansion/retreat events have been documented for southern South America, some of which can be recognized worldwide (Rutter et al. 2012). During the late Pliocene (4.8–4.7 Ma, 3.5–2.79 Ma), extra-Andean ice sheets formed in Patagonia, with major expansions (the so-called Great Patagonian Glaciation) dating to ~2.4 Ma and ~1 Ma (Rabassa 2008; Rutter et al. 2012). Evidence of early Pleistocene expansions (~2.6 Ma) has been recovered in the Andes of Bolivia and Colombia, while that for the mid-Pleistocene glaciation (~1 Ma) has been recovered from the Bogota basin of Colombia (Rutter et al. 2012). The Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) in the Northern Hemisphere is recorded from ~80 to 20 Ka (Wisconsinan glaciation), while in South America it ranges from ~48 to 25 Ka (Rutter et al. 2012). In South America, evidence for this later advance is restricted to the cordilleras and valleys of the Andes (Clapperton 1993; Rabassa 2008; Rutter et al. 2012). Ice sheets reached their maximum ~26,500 years ago, with deglaciation starting ~19,000 years ago (Clark et al. 2009), ushering in the current interglacial period from about 11,700 years ago.
2.1.2 Tectonics—Rise of the Andes
The Andes, originating by subduction of oceanic crust underneath the Pacific margin of South America, constitutes the world’s longest active orogenic system (Ramos 2009). Its range extends more than 8000 km, from the Caribbean Sea in the north to Tierra del Fuego in the south, with an average height of about 4000 masl and maximum elevations up to 7000 masl (Ramos 1999).
Subduction, initiated in the late Proterozoic, has been episodic up to the present (Ramos 2009). In southern South America, several phases of Cenozoic Andean orogeny are denoted as the Incaica (~30 Ma), Pehuenche (~25 Ma), Quechua (~15.5 Ma), and Diaguita Phases (~4.5 Ma) (Yrigoyen 1979; Leanza and Hugo 1997). These events, defined at the latitudinal level of northern Patagonia (Neuquén Province), are diachronic along the major segments, usually identified as the northern, central, and southern Andes (Fig. 2.4). Each segment has its own history with regard to tectonics, including convergence rate of oceanic and continental plates, collision with allochthonous terrains, subduction angle, age and rigidity of oceanic crust, magmatism, and sedimentation. Normal subduction (angle about 30°) is characterized by intense vulcanism. Flat-slab subduction, with inclination between 5° and 10° (subhorizontal), is characterized by significant seismic activity, minor volcanism, and substantial compression forces (Ramos 1999) (Fig. 2.4).
With regard to diachronicity, the Principal Cordillera (about 33°S) was raised between 20 and 8.6 Ma, the Frontal Cordillera between 10 and 3 Ma, and the Precordillera after 4 Ma (Ramos 1999). The Cordillera Oriental was fully uplifted ~8 Ma in the extreme northwest of Argentina (Jujuy and Salta Provinces), while the Sierras Subandinas did not achieve maximum uplift until the early Pliocene (Ramos 1999). The level of uplift was such that the northwestern Argentinean Andes reached altitudes greater than 6000 m prior to 6 Ma.
The central Andes (the Altiplano of Bolivia, northern Chile, and southern Peru) underwent a steep uplift starting ~9 Ma, with the northern part reaching modern altitudes by ~8 Ma and the south by 3.6 Ma (Garzione et al. 2008; Bershaw et al. 2010).
In northern central and northern Andes (north of 20°S), present-day elevations were achieved during or soon after 10–8 Ma. Andean orogeny in Ecuador, Colombia, and Venezuela included collision with island arcs and oceanic plateaus (Iturralde-Vinent and MacPhee 1999; Coates et al. 2004; Ramos 2009; Farris et al. 2011; Montes et al. 2012; Coates and Stallard 2013). The Venezuelan Andes experienced rapid uplift and widening during the late Miocene (Erikson et al. 2012), with uplift in Merida, Sierra de Perija, Santa Marta, Lara-Falcón, and Guajira occurring ~5 Ma.
In Colombia, the rise of the Eastern Cordillera was complex, involving several steps. Depending on the area, uplift occurred at intervals between the Oligocene and late Miocene (~30–26 Ma, ~23–20 Ma, and ~10–6 Ma) and involved an overall rise of more than 1000 m (Ochoa et al. 2012). The Western and Central Cordilleras had emerged by the Paleocene–Eocene, with rejuvenation in the Miocene (Borrero et al. 2012). The Bogota basin in Colombia was less than 1000 m above sea level until the early Pliocene, when it rose to 1500 m. Between the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene, it reached its modern height of about 2500 m (Rutter et al. 2012).
For obvious reasons, the Andes constitutes an important biogeographic structure in South America. Its physiographic structure, in combination with the drastic environmental changes occasioned by their uplift, has long acted as biogeographic barriers for some taxa and corridors for others (Webb 1985, 1991; Woodburne 2010). In consequence, they have, in effect, ruled the later Cenozoic evolution of most terrestrial ecosystems in South America (Hoorn et al. 2010; Patterson et al. 2012).
2.1.3 Sea Level Changes and Marine Ingressions
South America experienced several marine ingressions between the late Miocene and Pleistocene. Marine deposits dating between 10 and 9 Ma in Patagonia and to ~9 Ma in the Pampean Region (Entre Rios Province) establish the occurrence of a late Miocene marine ingression in the southern cone (Del Río et al. 2013; Pérez 2013; Marengo 2015; for older transgressions, see Guerstein et al. 2010; Tambussi and Degrange 2013; Woodburne et al. 2014a). Evidence of another more recent marine ingression in Patagonia date to ~5.1 Ma (Del Río et al. 2013).
Several authors have supported the contention that the late Miocene (“Paranaense” and “Entrerriense”) ingression in the southern part of the continent communicated with coeval incursions in the north, resulting in a shallow epicontinental sea covering extensive portions of lowland South America (Räsänen et al. 1995; Ramos 1999; Hovikoski et al. 2007; Uba et al. 2009). The evidence for such widespread inundation is, however, either inconclusive (Hoorn et al. 2010; Marengo 2015) or contradictory (Latrubesse et al. 2010; Gross et al. 2011). By contrast, other authors have maintained that during the late Miocene, a giant lake, the Pebas system, occupied western Amazonia (Fig. 2.4). About 10 Ma this was replaced by a large fluvial system that connected several isolated basins (e.g., Amazon and Parana). In the Pliocene, the Amazonian region was elevated and the current river-systems became entrenched (Campbell et al. 2006; Cozzuol 2006; Hoorn et al. 2010).
Pleistocene glaciations produced recurrent changes in sea level (above the present level in interglacial periods, below in glacial stages). Rises caused brief marine ingressions, mainly limited to coastal areas and river basins (Clapperton 1993; Ponce et al. 2011; Rabassa and Ponce 2013). On the east coast of southern South America, low sea levels during glacial periods exposed a large portion of the continental platform, considerably increasing the extent of environments available for the terrestrial fauna (Ponce et al. 2011; Rabassa and Ponce 2013) (Fig. 2.5).
2.2 The South American Biota
The paleontologist Simpson (1950, 1980) recognized three phases/strata in South American mammalian evolution that, despite new discoveries, additions, and corrections, remain in use. The first stratum was characterized by the evolution of indigenous archaic forms, like pouched marsupials and their extinct relatives (Didelphimorphia, Microbiotheria, Paucituberculata, Polydolopimorphia, Sparassodonta; Chap. 3), archaic South American native ungulates—collectively, the SANU—(Notoungulata, Litopterna, Astrapotheria, Pyrotheria), sloths, anteaters, and armadillos (Pilosa and Cingulata). To this group was added a crew of immigrants from Africa (rodents and monkeys), defining the second stratum. Fossil evidence establishes that caviomorph rodents and platyrrhine primates have been in South America since the Eocene (Antoine et al. 2012; Woodburne et al. 2014b; Bond et al. 2015). Collectively, the mammalian groups composing Simpson’s first two strata are “natives.” Their splendid isolation (but see Wilf et al. 2013) ended during the late Neogene following the arrival of new placental groups from North America (see next section). The “invaders” included pumas, jaguars, foxes, bears, deer, lamas, horses, gomphotheres, mice, and humans (Carnivora, Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla, Gomphotheriidae, Cricetidae, and Hominidae), defining the third stratum of Simpson.
During the Paleogene, forests were widespread in South America, including the southern tip of the continent and the Antarctic Peninsula. Paleobotanical evidence from middle latitudes (~50°S) indicates that floras were extraordinarily diverse at that time, such as that of the early Eocene Laguna del Hunco (Chubut Province), which included ferns, conifers, and flowering plants. During the early Miocene, the Patagonian flora was characterized by Nothofagus trees (relatives of ñire, coihue, and lenga), araucarias, laurel, similar to current Andean-Patagonian forests from Chile and Argentina (Brea et al. 2012). The dry, windy, and sparsely vegetated environments so characteristic of central Patagonia today were at that time quite moist, with high rainfall and moderate temperatures. In lowland Patagonia, Andean uplift and long-term Cenozoic temperature reduction forced the replacement of earlier forest formations with more open and xerophytic vegetation during the middle–late Miocene. By late Miocene, Patagonian forests were dominated by Schinus, Prosopis, Celtis, with shrubby Ephedraceae and Asteraceae (Barreda et al. 2008; Dozo et al. 2010; Palazzesi et al. 2014). In north of Patagonia, evidence of mixed floras with C3-C4 species at localities between 21° and 35°S in Bolivia and Argentina indicates the presence of extensive grasslands (MacFadden et al. 1996) by 8 Ma. In central and northwestern Argentina, northern Chile, and at higher altitudes in the Colombian Andes, the percentage of high-altitude plants increased following the late Miocene–Pliocene, with the “Paramo” vegetation having become well established by the late Pliocene (Van der Hammen, 1973; Helmens and Van der Hammen 1994; Wijninga 1996; Starck and Anzótegui 2001). In the late Miocene (~9 Ma), the southern part of the Parana basin (Entre Ríos, Argentina) was occupied by seasonal tropical forest (Brea et al. 2013), which may indicate a southward extension of warmer conditions (Cozzuol 2006).
In the Pleistocene, glacial–interglacial climatic cycling strongly affected vegetation coverage (Fig. 2.6). During colder glacial phases, more arid conditions were present, with an overall retreat of forests and their replacement by open environments (Clapperton 1993; Cione et al. 2003, 2008, 2015; Woodburne et al. 2014a; and bibliography cited there). On the other hand, the warmer interglacial phases recorded conditions more similar to those of the present (Clapperton 1993; Cione et al. 2008, 2015).
These environmental and floristic changes from the middle Miocene–Pliocene onward had notable impacts on several autochthonous groups of mammals (e.g., Pascual and Ortiz Jaureguizar 1990). Although several groups of SANU (e.g., Astrapotheria, Leontinidae, Adianthidae, Notohippidae) became completely extinct in the middle Miocene, some xenarthran taxa radiated extensively (Megalonychidae, Megatheriidae, and Mylodontidae) (Marshall and Cifelli 1990). A few lineages of SANU continued and even produced restricted radiations (e.g., Toxodontidae), but their later history was one of continuing decline during the middle Miocene–Pleistocene, followed by further steep reductions in the Pliocene and finally their complete disappearance with the Pleistocene–Holocene transition and associated megafaunal extinctions (Marshall and Cifelli 1990; Bond et al. 1995).
Within this broad interval, a marked faunal turnover occurred during the mid-Pliocene (e.g., Kraglievich 1952; Tonni et al. 1992; Vizcaíno et al. 2004). Turnover has been attributed to environmental changes resulting from Andean orogeny (e.g., Ortiz Jaureguizar et al. 1995; Cione and Tonni 2001) as well as to the catastrophic effects of a bolide that apparently struck somewhere in or near the Atlantic coast ~3.3 Ma (Schultz et al. 1998; Vizcaíno et al. 2004). Another cause of particular interest here is the arrival of Holarctic invaders, to which discussion will now turn.
2.3 The Panamanian Isthmus and the “Great American Biotic Interchange”
Tectonism during the Miocene–Pliocene finally resulted in the establishment of a continuous terrestrial bridge between Central and South America (Coates et al. 2004; Farris et al. 2011) and triggered one of the most important biogeographic events of the Cenozoic: the “Great American Biotic Interchange.” The biotic exchange between the Americas is typically portrayed as principally affecting mammals, birds, and turtles, but of course other vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants were also involved (Stehli and Webb 1985; Woodburne 2010; Tambussi and Degrange 2013; Bagley and Johnson 2014; De la Fuente et al. 2014; Gutiérrez-García and Vázquez-Domínguez 2013; Leigh et al. 2014). Nor were the effects of closure of the seaway limited to the land; disconnection between the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean had wide repercussions for marine biotas as well (Leigh et al. 2014).
Subduction of the Cocos and Nazca Plates under the Caribbean large igneous province produced a volcanic arc that collided with northwestern South America ~12 Ma, reducing the distance between Central and South America, and creating an interstitial island chain (Coates et al. 2004; Fig. 2.7). Recent evidence suggests that the collision between Central and South America started around 25–23 Ma. By this time, Central America was a continuous peninsula, leaving only a narrow, shallow strait between the continents in the Miocene (Farris et al. 2011; Montes et al. 2012). Detrital zircons recovered from the northern Andes (Colombia) in northwestern South America have been interpreted as evidence of a terrestrial connection between present-day Panama and Colombia by 13–10 Ma (Montes et al. 2015; Fig. 2.7). Some biological data also suggested an emergence of the Panamanian land bridge earlier than the previous estimate of ~3 Ma. Divergence estimates for key Neotropical plants and animals (including marine taxa) suggested that several waves of dispersal to South America occurred between the interval ~20 and 6 Ma following Bacon et al. (2015). This challenging interpretation has been recently criticized based on the available geological and biological data (e.g., Marko et al. 2015; O’Dea et al. 2016) while acknowledging a more classical, younger age for the establishment of the Panama bridge and associated massive migration events. However, the interesting review of O’Dea et al. (2016) introduced some inaccurate data and mistakes (e.g., Fig. S3): (1) the dates for most immigration events should be taken with caution since the majority of first records of North American taxa in South America are not precisely dated (see Chaps. 4 and 5); (2), several immigration events to South America are incorrect (e.g., Lontra is present since the Ensenadan but not since the Lujanian; Galictis since the Vorohuean but not since the Ensenadan, Canis is only known since the latest Pleistocene but not since the Middle Pleistocene; see Chap. 4); and (3), the first record of Neotropical carnivorans has to be analyzed in the context of the bias in the SA Pleistocene fossil record (see Chap. 5, Prevosti and Soibelzon 2012).
The picture of land bridge development is still far from conclusively resolved, and there are other possible interpretations (Coates et al. 2004; Coates and Stallard 2013, 2015; Leigh et al. 2014). Coates and Stallard (2013, 2015) argued that narrow but deep marine barriers existed between the island arc and the Americas 15–12 Ma and that the final connection was not established until ~3 Ma. Furthermore, it is uncertain to what degree the Central American peninsula was actually subaerial at this time (Leigh et al. 2014). There is also evidence for a persistent shallow-water connection between the Pacific and the Caribbean through the 10–3.5 Ma interval, with complete interruption occurring only around 3 Ma (Coates et al. 2004; Osborne et al. 2014). Even if the interpretation of Montes et al. (2015) concerning the early connection of the Panama arc with South America is accepted, their data cannot confirm the existence of a complete terrestrial corridor between Central and South America. Equally, the divergence dates and immigration rates reported by Bacon et al. (2015) do not constitute conclusive support for an early southward irruption of North American mammals interpreted as a kind of “advance” GABI (Woodburne 2010; Cione et al. 2015). Roughly, their results are congruent with the traditional interpretation of the vertebrate fossil record, with the addition of a few dispersals in the Miocene and possibly a larger event occurring during the early and late Pliocene. Obviously, any estimates of age of clade divergences are contingent on assumptions made in the construction of models or the choice of calibrations, and the relevant cladogenetic events may have occurred outside South America.
In any case, it is clear that the new datasets indicate that the rise of the Panamanian land bridge is much more complex than previously thought and that the evanescent existence of terrestrial connections between Central and South America before 3 Ma is quite plausible. Changes in sea level, climate, and vegetation must have affected the Panamanian faunal highway in a multitude of ways over time (e.g., Leigh et al. 2014; Bagley and Johnson 2014).
Lower sea levels presumably resulted in the existence of a temporary or nearly complete isthmus in the late Miocene, with a permanently complete terrestrial bridge in place by ~3 Ma (produced by a sea level reduction related to increased northern glaciation) and later Pleistocene glaciations enhancing its permeability (Woodburne 2010; Leigh et al. 2014; Bagley and Johnson 2014). This situation was reversed during the interglacials, when higher sea levels could reconnect the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (Bagley and Johnson 2014). Pacific dry forests in lower Central America were established in the early Pliocene (>4 Ma); remnants were present until the Late Pleistocene when these areas became savannas with patchy forest (Bagley and Johnson 2014). Northern temperate tree species were present in lowland Central America in the late Miocene–Pliocene, suggesting that the composition of tropical rainforests was recurrently affected by cooler and drier climates (Woodburne 2010). During the last glacial maximum, montane forests were found at lower altitudes. A high-altitude Paramo corridor was thus established, which could have assisted the migration of mammals adapted to grasslands and other open landscapes (Webb 1985, 1991, 2006; Woodburne 2010; Bagley and Johnson 2014; but see Colinvaux et al. (1996) for an alternative interpretation).
The classic interpretation places the GABI as having occurred subsequent to ~3.0 Ma, with pulses at 2.6–2.4 Ma (Marplatan), a major event of faunal exchange at ~1.8 Ma (early Ensenadan), followed by still other, younger events (Woodburne 2010; Prevosti and Soibelzon 2012). Some early migration events toward North America recorded around 9 Ma and toward South America at ~7.3 Ma and ~5 Ma are exemplified by ground sloths, procyonids, and cricetids, respectively (Woodburne 2010; Prevosti and Soibelzon 2012; Cione et al. 2015). Recently, several North American mammal taxa have been reported from ~9.5 Ma deposits in the Amazon basin. The presence of a dromomerycine artiodactyl, gomphotheres, peccaries, and tapirs in these contexts constitutes evidence of an earlier terrestrial interchange between North and South America (Campbell et al. 2009, 2010; Frailey and Campbell 2012; Prothero et al. 2014). However, the taxonomy of some of these fossils and, in particular, their age has been questioned (Alberdi et al. 2004; Ferretti 2008; Lucas and Alvarado 2010; Lucas 2013; Mothé and Avilla 2015). Compounding the problem is that their provenance is indeterminate in some instances (e.g., the dromomerycine artiodactyl was found in reworked deposits; see Prothero et al. 2014). Other than the aforementioned, North American taxa recorded in the South American Neogene begin with procyonids at ~8 Ma, cricetid rodents in the early Pliocene (~5.3–4 Ma), peccaries in the mid-Pliocene (~3.3 Ma), and camelids, canids, equids, gomphotheres, and weasels in the late Pliocene (2.8–2.6 Ma). The Quaternary fossil record shows a massive migration in the early Pleistocene (~1.8 Ma) with the first records of cervids, tapirs, ursids, felids, large canids, and otters (Pardiñas 1999; Prevosti et al. 2006; Woodburne et al. 2006; Prevosti and Pardiñas 2009; Woodburne 2010; Prevosti and Soibelzon 2012; Cione et al. 2015) (Fig. 2.8). Further migrations followed in the Late Pleistocene and the Holocene (Woodburne 2010), including a very important increase in carnivoran diversity ~12 Ka (Prevosti and Soibelzon 2012; Prevosti et al. 2013).
Migrations from South to North America occurring in the interval ~9–7 Ma (late Miocene) include ground sloths and terror birds (Fig. 2.8), followed by other groups of ground sloths and giant armadillos in the early Pliocene (~5 Ma), hydrochoerids (capybaras), megatherids, and porcupines in the late Pliocene (~2.7 Ma), and anteaters, toxodonts, and opossums in the Pleistocene (Woodburne 2010; Cione et al. 2015). These southern migrants proved to be less successful than their northern counterparts in South America, with limited speciation followed by extinction of most taxa of South American origin (Woodburne 2010; Carrillo et al. 2015). In contrast, northern lineages diversified in South America—sometimes spectacularly, as in the case of canids—and have now become a fully integrated part of the extant mammalian fauna of South America (Woodburne 2010; Prevosti and Soibelzon 2012; Leigh et al. 2014; Cione et al. 2015).
References
Alberdi MT, Prado JL, Salas R (2004) The Pleistocene gomphotheres (Gomphotheriidae, Proboscidea) from Peru. Neues Jahrb Geol P-A 231:423–452
Antoine P-O, Marivaux L, Croft D et al (2012) Middle Eocene rodents from Peruvian Amazonia reveal the pattern and timing of caviomorph origins and biogeography. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:1319–1326
Bacon CD, Silvestro D, Jaramillo C et al (2015) Biological evidence supports an early and complex emergence of the Isthmus of Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:6110–6115
Bacon CD, Molnar P, Antonelli A, Crawford A, Montes C (2016) Quaternary glaciation and the Great American Biotic Interchange. Geology 44:375–378
Bagley JC, Johnson JB (2014) Phylogeography and biogeography of the lower Central American Neotropics: diversification between two continents and between two seas. Biol Rev 89:767–790
Barreda V, Guler V, Palazzesi L (2008) Late Miocene continental and marine palynological assemblages from Patagonia. Dev Quat Sci 11:343–350
Benedetto JL (2010) El continente de Gondwana a través del tiempo. Una introducción a la Geología Histórica. Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Córdoba
Bershaw J, Garzione CN, Higgins P et al (2010) Spatial-temporal changes in Andean plateau climate and elevation from stable isotopes of mammal teeth. Earth Planet Sci Lett 289:530–538
Bond M, Cerdeño E, López G (1995) Los ungulados nativos de América del Sur. In: Leone G, Tonni EP (eds) Alberdi MT. Monografías del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, pp 259–275
Bond M, Tejedor MF, Campbell KE et al (2015) Eocene primates of South America and the African origins of New World monkeys. Nature 520:538–541
Borrero C, Pardo A, Jaramillo CM et al (2012) Tectonostratigraphy of the Cenozoic Tumaco forearc basin (Colombian Pacific) and its relationship with the northern Andes orogenic build up. J S Am Earth Sci 39:75–92
Brea M, Zucol AF, Iglesias A (2012) Fossil plant studies from late early Miocene of the Santa Cruz Formation: paleoecology and paleoclimatologyat the passive margin of Patagonia, Argentina. In: Vizcaíno SF, Kay RF, Bargo MS (eds) Early Miocene Paleobiology in Patagonia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 104–128
Brea M, Zucol A, Franco MJ (2013) Paleoflora de la Formación Paraná (Mioceno Tardío), Cuenca Chaco-Paranaense. Publicación Especial APA 14:28–40
Campbell KE, Frailey CD, Romero-Pittman L (2006) The Pan-Amazonian Ucayali Peneplain, late Neogene sedimentation in Amazonia, and the birth of the modern Amazon River system. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 239:166–219
Campbell KE Jr, Frailey CD, Romero-Pittman L (2009) In defense of Amahuacatherium (Proboscidea: Gomphotheriidae). Neues Jahrb Geol P-A 252:113–128
Campbell KE Jr, Prothero DR, Romero-Pittman L, Hertel F, Rivera N (2010) Amazonian magnetostratigraphy: dating the first pulse of the Great American Faunal Interchange. J S Am Earth Sci 29:619–626
Carrillo JD, Forasiepi AM, Jaramillo C, Sánchez-Villagra MR (2015) Neotropical mammal diversity and the Great American Biotic Interchange: a palaeontological perspective from northern South America. Front Genet—Evolutionary and Population Genetics 5(Article 451):1–11
Cione AL, Tonni EP (2001) Correlation of Pliocene to Holocene southern South American and European vertebrate-bearing units. Boll Soc Paleontol Ital 40:1–7
Cione AL, Tonni EP, Soibelzon L (2003) The broken zig-zag: late Cenozoic large mammal and tortoise extinctions in South America. Rev Mus Arg Sci Nat Bernardino Rivadavia 5:1–19
Cione AL, Tonni EP, Soibelzon L (2008) Did humans cause the Late Pleistocene-early Holocene mammalian extinctions in South America in a context of shrinking open areas? In: Haynes G (ed) American Megafaunal Extinctions at the End of the Pleistocene. Springer Science, Dordrecht, pp 125–144
Cione AL, Gasparini G, Soibelzon E et al (2015) The Great American Biotic Interchange. A South American Perspective, Springer, Dordrecht
Clapperton C (1993) Quaternary geology and geomorphology of South America. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 779
Clark PU, Dyke AS, Shakun JD, Carlson AE, Clark J, Wohlfarth B, Mitrovica JX, Hostetler SW, McCabe AM (2009) The Last Glacial Maximum. Science 325:710–714
Coates AG, Stallard RF (2013) How old is the Isthmus of Panama? Bull Mar Sci 89:801–813
Coates A, Stallard R (2015) Historia Natural del Istmo de Panamá. In: Rodríguez Mejía F, O’Dea A (eds) Historia Natural del Istmo de Panamá. Toppan Lee Fung, Panamá, pp 17–27
Coates AG, Collins LS, Aubury MP, Berggren WA (2004) The geology of the Darien, Panama, and the late Miocene-Pliocene collision of the Panama arc with northwestern South America. Bull Geol Soc Am 116:1327–1344
Colinvaux PA, De Oliveira PE, Moreno JE, Miller MC, Bush MB (1996) A long pollen record from lowland Amazonia: forest and cooling in glacial times. Science 274:85–88
Cozzuol MA (2006) The Acre vertebrate fauna: age, diversity, and geography. J S Am Earth Sci 21:185–203
De la Fuente MS, Sterli J, Maniel IJ (2014) Origin, evolution and biogeographic history of South American turtles. Springer, Dordrecht
Del Río CJ, Griffin M, McArthur JM et al (2013) Evidence for early Pliocene and late Miocene transgressions in southern Patagonia (Argentina): 87Sr/86Sr ages of the pectinid “Chlamys” actinodes (Sowerby). J S Am Earth Sci 47:220–229
Dozo MT, Bouza P, Monti A et al (2010) late Miocene continental biota in Northeastern Patagonia (Península Valdés, Chubut, Argentina). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 297:100–109
Erikson JP, Kelley SA, Osmolovsky P, Verosub KL (2012) Linked basin sedimentation and orogenic uplift: the Neogene Barinas basin sediments derived from the Venezuelan Andes. J S Am Earth Sci 39:138–156
Farris DW, Jaramillo C, Bayona G et al (2011) Fracturing of the Panamanian Isthmus during initial collision with: South America. Geology 39:1007–1010
Ferretti MP (2008) A review of South American gomphotheres. N Mex Nat Hist Sci Mus Bull 44:381–391
Forasiepi AM, Martinelli AG, Blanco JL (2007) Bestiario fósil. Mamíferos del pleistoceno de la Argentina. Albatros Editorial, Buenos Aires, p 192
Frailey CD, Campbell KE (2012) Two new genera of peccaries (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Tayassidae) from upper Miocene deposits of the Amazon Basin. J Paleontol 86:852–877
Garzione CN, Hoke GD, Libarkin JC et al (2008) Rise of the Andes. Science 320:1304–1307
Goin FJ, Abello MA, Chornogubsky L (2010) Middle Tertiary marsupials from central Patagonia (early Oligocene of Gran Barranca): understanding South America’s Grande Coupure. In: Madden RH, Carlini AA, Vucetich MG, Kay RF (eds) The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: evolution and environmental change through the middle Cenozoic of Patagonia. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 71–107
Goin FJ, Woodburne MO, Zimicz AN, Martin GM, Chornogubsky L (2016) A brief history of South American metatherians, evolutionary contexts and intercontinental dispersals. Springer, Dordrecht
Gross M, Piller WE, Ramos MI, da Silva Paz Douglas, Jackson J (2011) late Miocene sedimentary environments in south-western Amazonia (Solimões Formation; Brazil). J S Am Earth Sci 32:169–181
Guerstein G, Guler M, Brinkhuis H, Wrnaar J (2010) Mid-Cenozoic paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic trends in the southwestern Atlantic Basins: a dinoflagellate view. In: Madden RH, Carlini AA, Vucetich MG, Kay RF (eds) The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: evolution and environmental change through the middle Cenozoic of Patagonia. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 398–409
Gutiérrez-García TA, Vázquez-Domínguez E (2013) Consensus between genes and stones in the biogeographic and evolutionary history of Central America. Quat Res 79:311–324
Haq BU, Hardenbol J, Vail PR et al (1987) Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science 235:1156–1167
Haug GH, Tiedemann R (1998) Effect of the formation of the Isthmus of Panama on Atlantic Ocean thermohaline circulation. Nature 393:673–676
Helmens K, Van der Hammen T (1994) The Pliocene and Quaternary of the high plain of Bogotá (Colombia): a history of tectonic uplift, basin development and climatic change. Quat Int 22:41–81
Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, ter Steege H et al (2010) Amazonia through time: Andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science 330:927–931
Hovikoski J, Räsänen M, Gingras M et al (2007) Palaeogeographical implications of the Miocene Quendeque Formation (Bolivia) and tidally-influenced strata in southwestern Amazonia. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 243:23–41
Iturralde-Vinent MA, MacPhee RDE (1999) Paleogeography of the Caribbean region: implications for Cenozoic biogeography. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 238:1–95
Kraglievich JL (1952) El perfil geológico de Chapadmala1 y Miramar. Resumen Preliminar. Rev Mus Mun Cs Nat y Trad Mar del Plata 1:8–37
Latrubesse EM, Cozzuol M, da Silva-Caminha SAF et al (2010) The late Miocene paleogeography of the Amazon Basin and the evolution of the Amazon River system. Earth-Science Rev 99:99–124
Leanza HA, Hugo CA (1997) Hoja geológica 3969-III Picun Leufú. Bol SEGEMAR 218:1–135
Leigh EG, O’Dea A, Vermeij GJ (2014) Historical biogeography of the Isthmus of Panama. Biol Rev 89:148–172
Livermore R, Hillenbrand C-D, Meredith M, Eagles G (2007) Drake Passage and Cenozoic climate: an open and shut case? Geochem Geophys 8:1–11
Lucas SG (2013) The palaeobiogeography of South American gomphotheres. J Palaeogeogr 2:19–40
Lucas SG, Alvarado GE (2010) Fossil Proboscidea of the upper Cenozoic of Central America: taxonomy, evolutionary and paleobiogeographic significance. Rev Geol Am Cent 42:9–42
MacFadden BJ, Cerling TE, Prado J (1996) Cenozoic terrestrial ecosystem evolution in Argentina: evidence from carbon isotopes of fossil mammal teeth. Palaios 11:319–327
Marengo H (2015) Neogene micropaleontology and stratigraphy of Argentina. The Chaco-Paranense basin and the Península de Valdés, Springer, Dordrecht
Marko PB, Eytan RI, Knowlton N (2015) Do large molecular sequence divergences imply an early closure of the Isthmus of Panama? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E5766. doi:10.1073/pnas.1515048112
Marshall LG, Cifelli RL (1990) Analysis of changing diversity patterns in Cenozoic Land Mammal Age faunas, South America. Palaeovertebrata 19:169–210
Meng J, McKenna MC (1998) Faunal turnovers of Palaeogene mammals from the Mongolian Plateau. Nature 394:364–367
Montes C, Cardona A, McFadden R et al (2012) Evidence for middle Eocene and younger land emergence in central Panama: implications for Isthmus closure. Bull Geol Soc Am 124:780–799
Montes C, Cardona A, Jaramillo C et al (2015) middle Miocene closure of the Central American Seaway. Science 348:226–230
Mothé D, Avilla L (2015) Mythbusting evolutionary issues on South American Gomphotheriidae (Mammalia: Proboscidea). Quat Sci Rev 110:23–35
O’Dea A, Lessios H, Coates A, Eytan R, Restrepo-Moreno S, Cione A, Collins L, de Queiroz A, Farris D, Norris R, Stallard R, Woodburne M, Aguilera O, Aubry M, Berggren W, Budd A, Cozzuol M, Coppard S, Duque-Caro S, Finnegan S, Gasparini G, Grossman E, Johnson K, Keigwin L, Knowlton N, Leigh E, Leonard-Pingel J, Marko P, Pyenson N, Rachello-Dolmen P, Soibelzon E, Soibelzon L, Todd J, Vermeij G, Jackson J (2016) Formation of the Isthmus of Panama. Sci Adv Sci Adv 2:e1600883
Ochoa D, Hoorn C, Jaramillo C et al (2012) The final phase of tropical lowland conditions in the axial zone of the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia: evidence from three palynological records. J S Am Earth Sci 39:157–169
Ortiz Jaureguizar E, Prado JL, Alberdi MT (1995) Análisis de las comunidades de mamíferos continentales del Plio-Pleistoceno de la región pampeana y su comparación con la del área demediterráneo occidental. In: Alberdi MT, Leone G, Tonni EP (eds) Evolución Biológica y Climática de la Región Pampeana durante los Últimos Cinco Millones de Años. Un Ensayo de Correlación con el Mediterráneo Occidental. Monografías delMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, pp 385–406
Osborne AH, Newkirk DR, Groeneveld J, Martin EE, Tiedemann R, Frank M (2014) The seawater neodymium and lead isotope record of the final stages of Central American Seaway closure. Paleoceanography 29:715–729
Palazzesi L, Barreda VD, Cuitiño JI et al (2014) Fossil pollen records indicate that Patagonian desertification was not solely a consequence of Andean uplift. Nat Commun 5:3558
Pardiñas UFJ (1999) Fossil murids: taxonomy, paleoecology, and paleoenvironments. Quat South Am 12:225–254
Pascual R, Ortiz Jaureguizar E (1990) Evolving climates and mammal faunas in Cenozoic South American. J Human Evol 19:23–60
Patterson BD, Solari S, Velazco PM (2012) The role of the Andes in the diversification and biogeography of Neotropical mammals. In: Patterson BD, Costa LP (eds) Bones, clones, and biomes: the history and geography of Recent Neotropical mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 351–378
Pérez LM (2013) Nuevo aporte al conocimiento de la edad de la Formación Paraná, Mioceno de la Provincia de Entre Ríos, Argentina. Publicación Especial APA 14:7–12
Pfuhl HA, McCave IN (2005) Evidence for late Oligocene establishment of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Earth Planet Sci Lett 235:715–728
Ponce JF, Rabassa J, Coronato A, Borromei AM (2011) Palaeogeographical evolution of the Atlantic coast of Pampa and Patagonia from the last glacial maximum to the middle Holocene. Biol J Linn Soc 103:363–379
Prevosti FJ, Pardiñas UFJ (2009) Comment on “The oldest South American Cricetidae (Rodentia) and Mustelidae (Carnivora): late Miocene faunal turnover in central Argentina and the Great American Biotic Interchange” by D.H. Verzi and C.I. Montalvo. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 280:543–547
Prevosti F, Soibelzon L (2012) Evolution of the South American carnivores (Mammalia, Carnivora): a paleontological perspective. In: Patterson BD, Costa LP (eds) Bones, clones, and biomes: the history and geography of Recent Neotropical mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 102–122
Prevosti FJ, Gasparini GM, Bond M (2006) On the systematic position of a specimen previously assigned to Carnivore from the Pliocene of Argentina and its implications for the Great American Biotic Interchange. Neues Jahrb Geol P-A 242:133–144
Prevosti FJ, Forasiepi A, Zimicz N (2013) The evolution of the Cenozoic terrestrial mammalian predator guild in South America: competition or replacement? J Mamm Evol 20:3–21
Prothero DR (1994) The Eocene-Oligocene transition: paradise lost. Columbia Univ. Press, New York
Prothero DR, Campbell KE, Beatty BL, Frailey CD (2014) New late Miocene dromomerycine artiodactyl from the Amazon Basin: implications for interchange dynamics. J Paleontol 88:434–443
Rabassa J (2008) Late Cenozoic glaciations in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego. Dev Quat Sci 11:151–204
Rabassa J, Ponce JF (2013) The Heinrich and Dansgaard-Oeschger climatic events during Marine Isotopic Stage 3: searching for appropriate times for human colonization of the Americas. Quat Int 299:94–105
Ramos VA (1999) Plate tectonic setting of the Andean Cordillera. Episodes 22:183–190
Ramos VA (2009) Anatomy and global context of the Andes: main geologic features and the Andean orogenic cycle. Geol Soc Am Mem 204:31–65
Räsänen ME, Linna AM, Santos JCR, Negri FR (1995) Late Miocene tidal deposits in the Amazonian foreland basin. Science 269:386–390
Reguero M, Goin F, Acosta C, Tania H (2013) Late Cretaceous/Paleogene West Antarctica terrestrial biota and its intercontinental affinities. Springer, Dordrecht
Rutter N, Coronato A, Helmens K et al (2012) Glaciations in North and South America from the Miocene to the Last Glacial Maximum. Comparisons, linkages and uncertainties. Springer, Dordrecht
Scher HD, Martin EE (2006) The timing and climatic influence of the opening of Drake passage. Science 312:428–430
Schultz P, Zarate M, Hames W et al (1998) A 3.3 Ma impact in Argentina and possible consequences. Science 282:2061–2063
Simpson GG (1950) History of the fauna of Latin America. Am Sci 38:361–389
Simpson GG (1980) Splendid Isolation. The curious history of South American mammals. Yale University Press, New Haven
Sluijs A, Brinkhuis H, Schouten S, Bohaty SM, John CM, Zachos JC, Sinninghe Damste JS, Crouch EM, Dickens GR (2007) Environmental precursors tolight carbon input at the Paleocene/Eocene boundary. Nature 450:1218–1221
Starck D, Anzótegui LM (2001) The late climatic change persistence of a climatic signal through the orogenic stratigraphic record in northwestern of Argentina. J S Am Earth Sci 14:763–774
Stehli FG, Webb SD (1985) The Great American. Biotic Interchange. Plenum Press, New York
Tambussi C, Degrange F (2013) South American and Antarctic continental Cenozoic birds. Paleobiogeographic affinities and disparities. Springer, Dordrecht
Tonni EP, Alberdi MT, Prado JL, Bargo MS, Cione AL (1992) Changes of mammal assemblages in the Pampean Region (Argentina) and their relation with the Plio-Pleistocene boundary. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 95:179–194
Uba CE, Hasler CA, Buatois LA et al (2009) Isotopic, paleontologic, and ichnologic evidence for late Miocene pulses of marine incursions in the central Andes. Geology 37:827–830
Van der Hammen T (1973) Upper Quaternary vegetational and climatic sequence of the Fúquene area (Eastern, cordillera, Colombia). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 14:9–92
Vizcaíno SF, Fariña RA, Zárate M et al (2004) Palaeoecological implications of the mid-Pliocene faunal turnover in the Pampean Region (Argentina). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 213:101–113
Webb SD (1985) Late Cenozoic mammal dispersals between the Americas. In: Stehli FG, Webb SD (eds) The Great American Biotic Interchange. Plenum Press, New York, pp 357–386
Webb SD (1991) Ecogeography and the Great American Interchange. Paleobiology 17:266–280
Webb SD (2006) The Great American Biotic Interchange: Patterns and Processes. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 93:245–257
Wijninga VM (1996) Palynology and paleobotany of the early Pliocene section Río Frío 17 (Cordillera Oriental, Colombia): Biostratigraphical and chronostratigraphical implications. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 92:329–350
Wilf P, Cúneo R, Escapa IH, Pol D, Woodburne MO (2013) Splendid and seldom isolated: the paleobiogeography of Patagonia. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 41:561–603
Wing SL, Alroy J, Hickey LJ (1995) Plant and mammal diversity in the Paleocene to early Eocene of the Bighorn Basin. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 115:117–156
Woodburne MO (2010) The Great American Biotic Interchange: dispersals, tectonics, climate, sea level and holding pens. J Mamm Evol 17:245–264
Woodburne MO, Cione AL, Tonni EP (2006) Central American provincialism and the Great American Biotic Interchange. In: Carranza-Castañeda Ó, Lindsay EH (eds) Advances in late Tertiary vertebrate paleontology in Mexico and the Great American Biotic Interchange. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología and Centro de Geociencias, Publicación Especial 4, México, pp 73–101
Woodburne MO, Goin FJ, Bond M et al (2014a) Paleogene land mammal faunas of South America; a response to global climatic changes and indigenous floral diversity. J Mammal Evol 21:1–73
Woodburne MO, Goin FJ, Raigemborn MS, Heizler M, Gelfo JN, Oliveira EV (2014b) Revised timing of the South American early Paleogene land mammal ages. J S Am Earth Sci 54:109–119
Yrigoyen MR (1979) Cordillera Principal. Actas II Simp Geol Reg, Acad Nac Cs Córdoba 1:651–694
Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L et al (2001) Trends, global rhythms, aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to Present. Science 292:686–693
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prevosti, F., Forasiepi, A.M. (2018). Paleoenvironment, Tectonics, and Paleobiogeography. In: Evolution of South American Mammalian Predators During the Cenozoic: Paleobiogeographic and Paleoenvironmental Contingencies. Springer Geology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03701-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03701-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03700-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03701-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)