Skip to main content

Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus

Born: 475–7

Died: Around 526

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

Boethius was one of the most studied philosophers in the Middle Ages. His definition of quadrivium, his translations of Aristotle’s Logic, and above all his The Consolation of Philosophy define medieval culture long before the Arabic transmission of ancient texts. In the Renaissance, the popularity of Boethius did not diminish, but there was a shift in the type of scholarship applied to his works: on the one hand, sixteenth-century translations of Aristotle’s logical works competed with those by Boethius; on the other hand, the Consolatio was progressively placed within the larger context of transmission of ancient philosophy that emphasized its pagan content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albesano, Silvia. 2006. Consolatio Philosophiae volgare. Volgarizzamenti e tradizioni discorsive nel Trecento italiano. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1988. Traditional logic. In The Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy, ed. Charles B. Schmitt et al., 143–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 2008. Developments in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. In Handbook of the history of logic. Vol. II: Mediaeval and renaissance logic, ed. Dov M. Gabbay and John Woods, 609–644. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Belli, Margherita. 2011. Il centro e la circonferenza. Fortuna del De consolatione philosophiae di Boezio fra Valla e Leibniz. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Robert. 2000. Boethius’s Consolation of philosophy in Italian renaissance education. In La Consolazione della filosofia nel medioevo e nel Rinascimento italiano/Boethius’s Consolation of philosophy in Italian medieval and renaissance education, ed. Robert Black and Gabriella Pomaro, 3–50. Tavarnuzze: SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancato, Dario. 2012. Readers and interpreters of the Consolatio in Italy (1300-1550). In A companion to Boethius in the middle ages, ed. Noel H. Kaylor Jr. and Philip E. Phillips, 375–411. New York/Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancato, Dario. 2018. Il Boezio di Benedetto Varchi. Edizione critica del volgarizzamento della Consolatio philosophiae (1551). Florence: Olshcki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancato, Dario, and Maude Vanhaelen. 2015. Francesco Cattani da Diacceto and Boethius: A Neoplatonic reading of the Consolatio in 16th-century Florence. Accademia 15: 53–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courcelle, Pierre. 1967. La Consolation de la Philosophie dans la tradition littéraire. Antécédents et postérité de Boèce. Paris: Études augustiniennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropp, Glynnis M. 1981. Boèce et Christine de Pizan. Bruxelles: L’imprimerie des Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galonnier, Alain. 2007. La vie de Boèce ou le christianisme comme donnée sociale. In Boèce, Opuscula sacra, I, Capita dogmatica (Traités II, III, IV), ed. Alain Galonnier, 31–120. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goris, Mariken. 2000. Boethius in het Nederlands. Studie naar en tekstuigave van de Gentse Boethius (1485), boek II. Hilversum: Verloren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goris, Mariken, and Lodi Nauta. 1999. The study of Boethius’ Consolatio in the Low Countries around 1500: The Ghent Boethius (1485) and the commentary by Agricola/Murmellius (1514). In Northern humanism in European context, 1469–1625. From the ‘Adwert Academy’ to Ubbo Emmius, ed. F. Akkerman et al., 109–130. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goris, Mariken, and Wissink, Wilma. 1997. The medieval Dutch tradition of Boethius’ Consolatio philosophiae. In Maarten J.F.M. Hoenen and Lodi Nauta, 121–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoenen, Maarten J.F.M., and Lodi Nauta, eds. 1997. Boethius in the Middle Ages. Latin and vernacular traditions of the Consolatio Philosophiae. Leiden/New York: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Ian. 1997. Placing Walton’s Boethius. In Maarten J.F.M. Hoenen and Lodi Nauta, 217–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafleur, Claude, and Joanne Carrier. 2004. L’enseignement philosophique à la Faculté des arts de l’Université de Paris en la première moitié du XIIIe siècle dans le miroir des textes didascaliques. Laval philosophique et théologique 60 (3): 409–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, Luca. 2013. Boezio in Dante. La Consolatio philosophiae nello scrittoio del poeta. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken, Raymond O.F.M. 1984. Denys the Carthusian commentator on Boethius’s De consolatione Philosophiae. Analecta Carthusiana 118: 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marenbon, John. 2003. Boethius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo. 1961. Praefatio. In Aristoteles Latinus I 1–5, Categoriae vel Praedicamenta, ed. Lorenzo Minio-Paluello, IX–XCVI. Bruges/Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo. 1962. Praefatio. In Aristoteles Latinus III 1–4, Analytica priora, ed. Lorenzo Minio-Paluello, IX–LXXXVIII. Bruges/Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnis, Alastair J., and Tim William Machan. 1993. The Boece as late-medieval translation. In Chaucer’s Boece and the medieval tradition of Boethius, ed. A.J. Minnis, 167–188. Rochester: D.S. Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreschini, Claudio. 2014. A Christian in toga. Boethius: Interpreter of antiquity and Christian theologian. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, Lodi. 1993. More Platonico loquitur: What Nicholas Trevet really did to William of Conches. In Chaucer’s Boece and the medieval Tradition of Boethius, ed. A.J. Minnis, 1–33. Rochester: D.S. Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, Lodi. 1997. The scholastic context of the Boethius commentary by Nicholas Trevet. In Maarten J.F.M. Hoenen and Lodi Nauta, 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, Lodi. 1999. A humanist reading of Boethius’s Consolatio Philosophiae: The commentary by Murmellius and Agricola (1514). In Between demonstration and imagination. Essays in the history of science and philosophy presented to John D. North, ed. Lodi Nauta and Arjo Vanderjagt, 313–338. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, Lodi. 2003. Some aspects of Boethius’ Consolatio Philosophiae in the renaissance. In Boèce: ou la chaîne des savoirs. Actes du colloque international de la Fondation Singer-Polignac, ed. Alain Galonnier, 767–778. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, Lodi. 2010. Boethius. In The classical tradition, ed. Anthony Grafton et al., 131–133. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rädle, Fidel, and Franz Worstbrock. 1978. Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. In Die deutsche Literatur des Mittelalters. Verfasserlexikon, ed. Kurt Ruh et al., vol. I, 908–927, 921–927. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Brancato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Brancato, D. (2018). Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_576-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_576-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics