Abstract
The history of bilingual education in the United States has shifted between tolerance and repression depending on politics, the economy, and the size of the immigrant population. Languages other than English have been (and continue to be) primarily seen as a problem to be remediated by the schools. However, the massive increase in students whose primary language is not English (today more than one in five) and who perform at exceptionally low levels in the nation’s schools has once again provoked discussion about the most effective way to educate them. Research has accumulated showing a clear advantage for “maintenance” dual language and bilingual programs over English-only or transitional programs with respect to achievement, attainment, and a number of other outcomes. Nonetheless, many challenges remain to implementing such programs on a large scale: the politics of bilingualism and the shortage of highly qualified teachers are among the primary obstacles. However, if federal and state education policies supported bilingualism as an important goal for all US students, and incentives were created to recruit and train bilingual teachers, the USA could rapidly join other developed nations that have long supported multilingualism and nurtured it in their students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agirdag, O. (2014). The literal cost of language assimilation for the children of immigration: The effects of bilingualism on labor market outcomes. In R. Callahan & P. Gándara (Eds.), The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy and the U.S. labor market (pp. 162–182). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
August, D., Goldenberg, C., & Rueda, R. (2010). Restrictive state language policies: Are they scientifically based? In P. Gándara & M. Hopkins (Eds.), Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies (pp. 139–158). New York: Teachers College Press.
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (4th ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Baker, K., & de Kanter, A. (1981). Effectiveness of bilingual education: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education/Office of Technical and Analytic Systems.
Batalova, J., & McHugh, M. (2010). Number and growth of students in U.S. schools in need of English instruction. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
Berliner, D., & Glass, G. (2014). 50 Myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools: The real crisis in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bialystock, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Capp, R., Fix, M., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passel, J., & Herwantoro, S. (2005). The new demography of America’s schools immigration and the no child left behind act. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311230_new_demography.pdf
Carter, T. (1970). Mexican Americans at school: A history of educational neglect. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Castañeda v Pickard 648 F.2d 989 (1981).
Center for Applied Linguistics. (2014). Directory of two-way bilingual programs in the U.S. 1991–2004. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2012). http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELAStandards
Crawford, J. (2004). Educating English learners: Language diversity in the classroom (5th ed.). Culver City: Bilingual Education Services.
Danoff, M. N. (1978). Evaluation of the impact of ESEA Title VII Spanish/English bilingual education programs. Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.
De Jong, E. (2011). Foundations for multilingualism in education. Philadelphia: Caslon Pub.
Escamilla, K., Hopewell, S., Butvilofsky, S., Sparrow, W., Soltero-González, L., Ruiz-Figueroa, O., & Escamilla, M. (2014). Biliteracy from the start: Literacy squared in action. Philadelphia: Caslon Pub.
Gándara, P., & Contreras, F. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gándara, P., Losen, D., August, D., Uriarte, M., Gómez, M. C., & Hopkins, M. (2010). Forbidden language: A brief history of U.S. language policy. In P. Gándara & M. Hopkins (Eds.), Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies (pp. 20–33). New York: Teachers College Press.
García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism & translanguaging in the 21st century. In T. Skutnab-Kangas, R. Phillipson, A. K. Mohanty, & M. Panda (Eds.), Social justice through multilingual education Bristol (pp. 140–158). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Garcia, A., & Morgan, C. (1997). A 50-state survey of requirements for the education of language minority children. Amherst: READ Abstracts Research and Policy Brief ERIC ED422747.
Genesee, F. (2004). What do we know about bilingual education for majority language students? In T. K. Bahtia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism and multiculturalism (pp. 547–576). Malden: Blackwell.
Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (2006). Educating English learners: A synthesis of research evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldenberg, C. (2008). Teaching English language learners: What the research does – and does not – Say. American Educator Summer 2008.
Goldenberg, C. (2013). Unlocking the research on English learners. American Educator, 38, 4–11.
Goldenberg, C., & Coleman, R. (2010). Promoting academic achievement among English learners: A guide to the research. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Horne v Flores 129 S.Ct. 2579 (2009).
Howard, E., Olague, N., & Rogers, D. (2003). The dual language program planner: A guide for designing and implementing dual language programs. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and the Center for Research on Education/Diversity and Excellence.
Kloss, H. (1977/1998). The American bilingual tradition. Washington, DC: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics.
Lau v. Nichols 414 U.S. 563 (1974).
Meyer v Nebraska 262 U.S. 390 (1923).
Meyer, M., & Feinberg, S. (1992). Assessing evaluation studies: The case of bilingual education strategies. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Portes, A., & Hao, L. (2002). The price of uniformity: Language, family and personality adjustment in the immigrant second generation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 893.
Ramirez, D. J., Yuen, S. D., Ramey, D. R., & Pasta, D. J. (1991). Final report: Longitudinal study of structured-English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual education programs for language-minority children (Vol. 1 & 2). San Mateo: Aguirre International.
Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8, 15–24.
Rumbaut, R. (2014). English plus: Exploring the socio-economic benefits of bilingualism in Southern California. In R. Callahan & P. Gándara (Eds.), The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy and the U.S. labor market (pp. 184–210). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ryan, C. (2013). Language use in the United States: 2011: American community survey reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-22.pdf
Santibañez, L., & Zárate, M. E. (2014). Bilinguals in the United States and college enrollment. In R. Callahan & P. Gándara (Eds.), The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy and the U.S. labor market (pp. 213–234). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Schlossman, S. (1983). Is there an American tradition of bilingual education? German in the public elementary schools, 1840–1919. American Journal of Education, 91, 139–186.
Schmid, C. (2001). The politics of language: Conflict, identity, and cultural pluralism in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slavin, R. & Cheung, A. (2005) A Synthesis of Research on Language of Reading Instruction for English Language Learners. Review of Educational Research, 75 (2), 247.
The biennial report to congress on the implementation of the title III state formula grant program school years 2009–10 (p. 30). (2013). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1972). The excluded student: Educational practices affecting Mexican Americans in the Southwest (Mexican American education study. Report no. 3). Washington, DC: Author.
Umansky, I., & Reardon, S. (2014). Reclassification patterns among Latino English learner students in bilingual, dual immersion, and English immersion classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 51(3), 879.
Wiley, T. G. (1998). The imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. In T. Ricento & B. Rurnaby (Eds.), Language and politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and realities (pp. 211–241). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zehler, A. M., Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Stephenson, T. G., Pendzick, M. L., & Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities. Washington, DC: Development Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gándara, P., Escamilla, K. (2016). Bilingual Education in the United States. In: Garcia, O., Lin, A., May, S. (eds) Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02324-3_33-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02324-3_33-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02324-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Bilingual Education in the United States- Published:
- 23 March 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02324-3_33-2
-
Original
Bilingual Education in the United States- Published:
- 22 March 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02324-3_33-1