Skip to main content

Critical Literacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Literacies and Language Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 673 Accesses

Abstract

Historically, the term “literacy” was defined as the ability to read and write. However, this limited definition of literacy has been challenged through the emergence of social theories, where it was recognized that literacy is more complex than traditional perspectives allow The New London Group (Harv Educ Rev 66(1):60–93, 1996). A body of work associated with the term new literacy studies (NLS) views literacy as a set of socially and culturally situated practices, rather than simply as a range of technical academic skills that operate at an individual level (Gee, Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses, critical perspectives on literacy and education. Falmer, London, 1990) (Heath 1983; Street 1984). This shift in perspective has embraced the plural and discursive nature of literacy and integrates ways of being and doing in the world (Luke, Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In Hasan R, Williams, G (eds) Literacy in society. Longman, London, 1995; Gee, An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge, Abingdon, 2005).

Critical approaches to literacy recognize the link between meaning making, power, and identity (Janks, Literacy and power. Routledge, Abingdon, 2010). While there are a number of orientations associated with critical literacy, all share the perspective that “human action is mediated by language and other symbol systems within particular cultural contexts” (Lewis et al. Reframing sociocultural research on literacy. Routledge, Abingdon, 2009, p. 5). Language therefore plays a key role in how we make sense of the world in which we live. Below is a brief review of some of the existing literature related to the history of critical literacy and some of its distinct orientations within the field of education. An account of the ways in which critical approaches to literacy have influenced teacher education programs and been instrumental in shaping teacher identity is considered. Finally, challenges associated with critical approaches to literacy are foregrounded and linked to future possibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behrman, E. (2006). Teaching about language, power and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F., Devlin, B., Freebody, P., Luke, A., Martin, J., Threadgold, T., et al. (1991). Teaching English literacy: A project of national significance on the pre-service training of teachers. Canberra/Darwin: Department of Employment, Education & Training & Northern Territory University Faculty of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., Fairclough, N., Ivanic, R., & Martin-Jones, M. (1990). A critical review of three current approaches to language awareness. Language and Education, 4(4), 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social future. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crookes, G. V. (2013). Critical ELT in action: Foundations, promises, praxis. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., & Trew, A. (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, E., Fraillon, J., Wolfram, S., O’Malley, K., Freeman, C., Murphy, M., & Ainley, J. (2012) National Assessment Program: ICT literacy technical report. http://works.bepress.com/eveline_gebhardt/8/

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2009). English learners Academic literacy and thinking. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education. Westport: Bergin and Garvey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2013). Critical literacy in teaching and research. Education Inquiry, 4(2), 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H., Dixon, K., Ferreira, A., & Granville, S. (2014). Doing critical literacy: Texts and activities for students and teachers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo, Z. (2004). Critical social theory and transformative knowledge: The functions of criticism in quality education. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., Enciso, P., & Moje, E. B. (2009). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Harste, J. (2008). Creating critical classrooms. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Harste, J. (2015). Creating critical classrooms: Reading and writing with an edge. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (1997). Genres of power: Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 308–338). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(5), 448–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., & Dooley, K. (2011). Critical literacy and second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II). Mahwah: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, A. (2012). Critical literacy and teacher identities: A discursive site of struggle. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 9(3), 220–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2009). Critical pedagogy, a look at the major concepts. In A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2009). Teacher identity. In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.), Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W. (1997). Critical literacy in the classroom. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.). (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Education at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. [Online] OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2013-en. Accessed 12 Dec 2014.

  • Rogers, R. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Criteria to consider in reviewing scholarship. In A. Trainor, & E. Graue (Eds.), Publishing qualitative research in the social and behavioural sciences: A guide for reviewers and researchers (pp 69--81). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (2014). Coaching literacy teachers as they design critical literacy practices. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 30(3), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Mosley, M. (2008). A critical discourse analysis of racial literacy in teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 19, 107–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Schaenen, I. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in language and literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(1), 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Wetzel, M. M. (2014). Designing critical literacy education through critical discourse analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangster, P., Stone, K., & Anderson, C. (2013). Transformative professional learning: Embedding critical literacies in the classroom. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 615–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (1980). Critical teaching and everyday life. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (2009). What is critical literacy? In A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the dialogical method of teaching. Journal of Education, 169(3), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, V. M., Tate, S. L., & Harste, J. C. (2013). Negotiating critical literacies with teachers: Theoretical foundations and pedagogical resources for pre-service and in-service contexts. Abingdon, Oxon Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. (1992). Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvonne Foley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Foley, Y. (2015). Critical Literacy. In: Street, B., May, S. (eds) Literacies and Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02321-2_11-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02321-2_11-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02321-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics