Abstract
Lighting is a major global energy consumer, and as such, it causes notable environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of lighting products are researched by life cycle assessment, a method that takes the whole life cycle of the product into account. It is important to study the product life cycle as whole so that the major environmental hot spots are identified and the environmental impacts are not shifted from one stage to another when choosing a different type of technology on the basis of environmental impacts.
This chapter presents the basics of the life cycle assessment for evaluating the environmental impacts of light sources in particular. The typical results of the life cycle assessment of light sources in general are presented, but the chapter concentrates only on the lamps used in households. Household lighting is changing in several countries in the world from old, inefficient technologies (incandescent lamp) to more modern light sources of a higher luminous efficacy (CFLs, LED lamps). The change is often justified by environmental reasons. The environmental assessments of household lamps show clearly that the change from incandescent lamps to lamps of higher luminous efficacy is a beneficial decision from the environmental point of view.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BIOIS (2003) Study on external environmental effects related to the life cycle of products and services. Appendix 2: Case studies. Bio Intelligence Service, European Commission. The report can be found online at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/ext_effects_appendix2.pdf
Dale AT, Bilec MM, Marriott J, Hartley D, Jurgens C, Zatcoff E (2011) Preliminary comparative life-cycle impacts of streetlight technology. J Infrastruct Syst 17(4):193–199
DEFRA (2009) Life cycle assessment of ultra-efficient lamps. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
Elijošiutė E, Balciukevičiūtė J, Denafas G (2012) Life cycle assessment of compact fluorescent and incandescent lamps: comparative analysis. Environ Res Eng Manage 61(3):65–72
ETSI (2011) Environmental Engineering (EE); Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ICT equipment, networks and services; General methodology and common requirements. ETSI, Sophia Antipolis
Gydesen A, Maimann D (1991) Life cycle analyses of integral compact fluorescent lamps versus incandescent lamp. In: Proceedings Right Light 1, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 411–417
ISO (2006a) 14040: Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization
ISO (2006b) 14044: Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization
Klöpffer W (2003) Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(2):157–159
Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95
Landis AE, Bilec MM, Rajagopalan N (2009) Life cycle assessment for evaluating green products and materials. In: Proceedings of US-Japan workshop on LCA of sustainable infrastructure materials, Sapporo
Michaud R, Belley C (2008) Analyse du cycle de vie comparative d’ampoules électriques: incandescentes et fluorescentes compactes. Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur le cycle de vie des produits, procédés et services (CIRAIG), Montréal
Osram (2009) Life cycle assessment of illuminants – a comparison of light bulbs, compact fluorescent lamps and LED lamps. Osram Opto Semiconductors GmbH, Regensburg
Parsons D (2006) The environmental impact of compact fluorescent lamps and incandescent lamps for Australian conditions. Environ Eng 7(2):8–14
Pfeifer RP (1996) Comparison between filament lamps and compact fluorescent lamps. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:8–16
Philips (2012) Luxeon rebel datasheets. Philips Lumileds Lighting Company. http://www.philipslumileds.com/products/luxeon-rebel/luxeon-rebel-white. Accessed May 2012
Quirk I (2009) Life-cycle assessment and policy implications of energy efficient lighting technologies. University of California, Berkeley
Radio-Electronics (2012) High brightness LED, HBLED tutorial. Adrio Communications, Surrey. http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/data/semicond/leds-light-emitting-diodes/high-brightness-hbled-basics-tutorial.php. Accessed May 2012
Ramroth L (2008) Comparison of life-cycle analyses of compact fluorescent and incandescent lamps based on rated life of compact fluorescent lamp. Rocky Mountain Institute
Slocum A (2005) A technology assessment of Light Emitting Diode (LED) solid state lighting for general illumination. National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE), Washington
Swarr TE, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W, Pesonen H-L, Ciroth A, Brent AC, Pagan R (2011) Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Pensacola
Tähkämö L (2013) Life cycle assessment of light sources – case studies and review of the analyses. Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University. Unigrafia Oy, Helsinki
Tähkämö L, Puolakka M, Halonen L, Zissis G (2012a) Comparison of life cycle assessments of LED light sources. J Light Vis Environ 36:44–53
Tähkämö L, Zissis G, Martinsons C (2012b) Methodology study of life cycle assessment of light sources. In: Proceedings of the 13th international symposium on the science and technology of lighting, Troy
U.S. DOE (2012a) Life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental impacts of LED lighting products, part 1: review of the life-cycle energy consumption of incandescent, compact fluorescent, and LED lamps (updated August 2012). United States Department of Energy
U.S. DOE (2012b) Life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental impacts of LED lighting products, part 2: LED manufacturing and performance. United States Department of Energy
U.S. DOE (2013) Life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental impacts of LED lighting products, part 3: LED environmental testing. United States Department of Energy
UNEP (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, Druk in de weer, Belgium
Welz T, Hischier R, Hilty LM (2011) Environmental impacts of lighting technologies – life cycle assessment and sensitivity analysis. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31:334–343
Yabumoto N, Hatta A, Jinno M, Hattori H (2010) Life Cycle Assessment of LED lamps and CFLs as the ideal light source for “sustainable development”. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on the science and technology of light sources and 3rd white LED conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Further Reading
Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
Boyd SB (2012) Life-cycle assessment of semiconductors. Springer, New York
Tähkämö L, Martinsons C, Ravel P, Grannec F, Zissis G (2014) Solid state lighting Annex: Life cycle assessment of solid state lighting, Final report. Energy Efficient End-Use Equipment (4E), International Energy Agency. Available at: http://ssl.iea-4e.org/files/otherfiles/0000/0068/IEA_4E_SSL_Report_on_LCA.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tähkämö, L., Dillon, H. (2014). Life Cycle Assessment of Lighting Technologies. In: Karlicek, R., Sun, CC., Zissis, G., Ma, R. (eds) Handbook of Advanced Lighting Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00295-8_41-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00295-8_41-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00295-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering