Abstract
Research conducted between December 2010 and March 2011 on academic integrity policies of 39 Australian universities identified five core elements of exemplary policy – access, approach, responsibility, support, and detail (Bretag et al., 2011b). To assess developments over the past decade, academic integrity policies of 42 Australian universities were analyzed using the five core elements of the framework. The current study shows a transformative change toward exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian universities. Access has improved, with quicker results when searching for the said policies. A major positive shift in line with recommendations is in the approach to uphold academic integrity, as well as an educative focus. The current study found that most policies (72%) had “academic integrity” in the title, contrasting to a decade ago, where most policies were titled as “plagiarism policy” or “academic misconduct policy.” The majority of policies (64%) were found to have an educative approach with some going further, referring to a “culture of academic integrity.” This is a significant and positive shift from the previous study which found that a minority (41%) of policies had an educative approach. Advocacy for responsibility as a broad institutional approach has been realized, with most policies (57%) including having stated responsibilities for all stakeholders – university, staff, and students. This contrasts to earlier research, where all stakeholders were responsible in a minority of policies (36%) stated that all stakeholders were responsible for upholding academic integrity. Support for students and staff is outlined in all current policies, some including dedicated training modules. The need for detail of academic integrity breach processes and outcomes was identified by early research as an area for development. In the current study, detail was evident in almost all policies (n = 40), with over half (n = 23) having a high level of detail including outcomes and consideration in breach handling. The proactive nature of academic integrity policies in Australian universities is evidenced by the inclusion of contract cheating in most (n = 29) policies analyzed, with two policies referring to “back washing” a form of machine-based plagiarism that involves paraphrasing. This reflects the inclusion of leading-edge research into plagiarism. Educative policies were more exemplary and responsive making a compelling case for a culture of academic integrity at all universities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2014). Embedding and extending exemplary academic integrity policy and support frameworks across the higher education sector. A. Government. https://ltr.edu.au/resources/SP12_2327_Bretag_Report_2014.pdf
Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2015). A conceptual framework for implementing exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_24-1.
Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., East, J., Green, M., James, C., McGowan, U., Partridge, L., Walker, R., & Wallace, M. (2011a). Academic integrity standards: A preliminary analysis of the academic integrity policies at Australian universities. AuQF 2011 Demonstrating Quality Melbourne. https://ro.uow.edu.au/asdpapers/323.
Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., James, C., Green, M., East, J., McGowan, U., & Patridge, L. (2011b). Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(2), 3–12. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1350&context=asdpapers
Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., McGowan, U., East, J., Green, M., Partridge, L., & James, C. (2014). ‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1150–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777406
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1837–1856.
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Rundle, K., Newton, P. M., Ellis, C., Sonia, S. S., & van Haeringen, K. (2020). Contract cheating in Australian higher education: A comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146
Carroll, J. (2002). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education.
Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. In Proceedings of 2nd International Plagiarism Conference.
Dawson, P., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2019). Can training improve marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating? A multi-disciplinary pre-post study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 715–725.
Dawson, P., Sutherland-Smith, W., & Ricksen, M. (2020). Can software improve marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating? A pilot study of the Turnitin authorship investigate alpha. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 473–482.
Devlin, M. (2006). Policy, preparation, and prevention: Proactive minimization of student plagiarism. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 45–58.
Duke Univ, D. N. C. C. f. A. I. (1999). The fundamental values of academic integrity [microform]: Honesty, trust, respect, fairness, responsibility. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED452778
East, J. (2009). Aligning policy and practice: An approach to integrating academic integrity. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3(1), A38–A51.
East, J., & Donnelly, L. (2012). Taking responsibility for academic integrity: A collaborative teaching and learning design. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 9(3), 2.
Eaton, S. E. (2022). Contract cheating in Canada: A comprehensive overview. In S. E. Eaton & J. Christensen Hughes (Eds.), Academic integrity in Canada: An enduring and essential challenge (pp. 165–187). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_8
Ellis, C., Zucker, I. M., & Randall, D. (2018). The infernal business of contract cheating: Understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–21.
Fishman, T. (2014). The fundamental values of academic integrity. C. University.
Foltýnek, T., & Glendinning, I. (2015). Impact of policies for plagiarism in higher education across Europe: Results of the project. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010207
Foltýnek, T., Dlabolová, D., Linkeschová, D., Calhoun, B., Glendinning, I., & Lancaster, T. (2018). South-East European project on policies for academic integrity. C. o. Europe https://rm.coe.int/prems-016918-gbr-2512-etined-vol-5-couv-texte-recadre-8482-bat-16x24-w/168078499c
Foltýnek, T., Ruas, T., Scharpf, P., Meuschke, N., Schubotz, M., Grosky, W., & Gipp, B. (2020). Detecting machine-obfuscated plagiarism. In International Conference on Information.
Gallant, T. B. (2007). The complexity of integrity culture change: A case study of a liberal arts college. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 391–411.
Gallant, T. B. (2008). Academic integrity in the twenty-first century: A teaching and learning imperative. ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 33, Number 5. ASHE Higher Education Report, 33(5), 1–143.
Gallant, T. B. (2011). Creating the ethical academy: A systems approach to understanding misconduct and empowering change. Routledge.
Glendinning, I., Foltynek, T., Demoliou, C., Joswik, K., & Stabingis, L. (2013). Comparison of policies for academic integrity in higher education across the European Union. http://plagiarism.cz/ippheae/files/D2-3-00%20EU%20IPPHEAE%20CU%20Survey%20EU-wide%20report.pdf
Grigg, G. A. (2010). Plagiarism in higher education: Confronting the policy dilemma. University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2015). Contract cheating: The outsourcing of assessed student work. In T. A. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 1–14). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_17-1
Macdonald, R., & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism – A complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262536
Mahmud, S., & Ali, I. (2021). Evolution of research on honesty and dishonesty in academic work: A bibliometric analysis of two decades. Ethics & Behavior, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2021.2015598
Mahmud, S., & Bretag, T. (2013). Academic integrity standards: Aligning policy and practice in Australian universities. A. Government. https://ltr.edu.au/resources/PP10_1783_Bretag_report_2013.pdf
Mahmud, S., Bretag, T., & Foltýnek, T. (2019). Students’ perceptions of plagiarism policy in higher education: A comparison of the United Kingdom, Czechia, Poland and Romania. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17(3), 271–289.
Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530412331283426
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Newton, P. M. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Frontiers in Education.
Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Mellar, H., & Aleksieva, L. (2019). Using a student authentication and authorship checking system as a catalyst for developing an academic integrity culture: A Bulgarian case study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09332-6
QAA. (2022). Contracting to cheat: How to address contract cheating, the use of third-party services and essay mills. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/guidance/contracting-to-cheat-in-higher-education-third-edition.pdf
Rogerson, A. M., & Basanta, G. (2016). Peer-to-peer file sharing and academic integrity in the internet age. Handbook of Academic Integrity, 273–285.
Rogerson, A. M., & McCarthy, G. (2017). Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1), 1–15.
Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture: What it is and how to change it. In P. Evans, Y. Doz, & A. Laurent (Eds.), Human resource management in international firms: Change, globalization, innovation (pp. 56–82). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11255-5_4
Stoesz, B. M., & Eaton, S. E. (2020). Academic integrity policies of publicly funded universities in western Canada. Educational Policy, 0895904820983032.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the internet, and student learning: Improving academic integrity. Routledge.
TEQSA. (2017). Good practice note: Addressing contract cheating to safeguard academic integrity. A. Government. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/latest-news/publications/good-practice-note-addressing-contract-cheating-safeguard-academic
Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902912994
Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2001). Academic dishonesty: An educator’s guide. Psychology Press.
Whitley, B. E., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2001). Academic integrity as an institutional issue. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mahmud, S. (2024). Transformative Change in Academic Integrity Policy at Australian Universities. In: Eaton, S.E. (eds) Second Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_119
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_119
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54143-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54144-5
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education