Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Figurations of the Tool Agnostic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creative Tools and the Softwarization of Cultural Production

Part of the book series: Creative Working Lives ((CWL))

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we sketch the outlines of the tool agnostic as figuration, a cultural trope for techno-social agency, that is particularly suited to contemporary cultural production. We develop this sketch through an analysis based on fieldwork of a graduate digital media training program. After a brief introduction, we begin the chapter by discussing our conceptual framework for the tool agnostic as figuration. We argue that it affords its actors with the ability to circumvent the antinomy between formalism and its critique as technological determinism by presenting the creative subject as perennially ambivalent—both lured and skeptic—toward the affordances and possibilities of softwarization. It gives the subject a sense of creative control through software by striving to be free from any commitment to software.

The empirical investigation provides a historical background for programs like the one encountered in the fieldwork, demonstrating how these institutions impart creative practice as something that is interdisciplinary, industry-oriented, and organizationally flexible. We then relate three vignettes of encounters with the tool agnostic over the course of the 16 months of fieldwork. We conclude by comparing the tool agnostic with another figure of contemporary creative practice, the craftsperson, and ask whether some traits of the former might present the contemporary creative subject with a suitable alternative to the latter’s nostalgic alignment with autonomous technical mastery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    All student names are pseudonyms. We also do not specify the name of the institution running the program, nor do we include dates of the fieldwork to help ensure anonymity for participants.

References

  • Adamson, G. (2019). The invention of craft. Bloomsbury Visual Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • agnostic, n. And adj. (n.d.). In OED Online. Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/4073

  • Ashton, D. (2010). Productive passions and everyday pedagogies: Exploring the industry-ready agenda in higher education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 9(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.9.1.41_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, D. (2011). Upgrading the self: Technology and the self in the digital games perpetual innovation economy. Convergence, 17, 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsamo, A. (2011). Designing culture: The technological imagination at work. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R. C., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for Agile software development. http://agilemanifesto.org/

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1970). The author as producer. New Left Review, 0(62), 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. M., & Dieter, M. (2015). Thinking postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design. In D. M. Berry & M. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design (pp. 1–11). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism (G. Elliott, Trans.). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, S. (1987). The Media Lab: Inventing the future at MIT. Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation (1st ed.). Harper Business, HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürger, P. (1984). Theory of the avant-garde (M. Shaw, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., & Piro, J. M. (2009). Expanding arts education in a digital age. Arts Education Policy Review, 110(3), 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, W. H. K. (2005). On software, or the persistence of visual knowledge. Grey Room, 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1162/1526381043320741

  • Chun, W. H. K. (2010). On “sourcery,” or code as fetish. Configurations, 16(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.0.0064

  • Chun, W. H. K. (2011). Programmed visions: Software and memory. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E., & Fujimura, J. H. (Eds.). (1992). The right tools for the job: At work in twentieth-century life. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, M. (2019). Keeping software present: Software as a timely object for STS studies of the digital. In J. Vertesi, D. Ribes, C. DiSalvo, L. Forlano, S. J. Jackson, Y. Loukissas, D. K. Rosner, & H. R. Shell (Eds.), DigitalSTS (pp. 423–446). University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691190600-029

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2016). The mediated construction of reality: Society, culture, mediatization. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, S. (2002). Spreadsheets, sitemaps and search engines: Why narrative is marginal to multimedia and networked communication, and why marginality is more vital than universality. In M. Rieser & A. Zapp (Eds.), New screen media: Cinema/art/narrative (pp. 3–13). BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. (2002). Manifesto for a digital Bauhaus. In C. Beardon & L. Malmborg (Eds.), Digital creativity: A reader (pp. 18–28). Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E. (2008). The classless workplace: The digerati and the new spirit of technocapitalism. WorkingUSA, 11(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-4580.2007.00197.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). What is an author? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought (pp. 101–120). Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, M., & Goffey, A. (2012). Evil media. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. R. (2006). Language wants to be overlooked: On software and ideology. Journal of Visual Culture, 5(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412906070519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, I., & Deuze, M. (2019). A business of one or nurturing the craft: Who are you? In M. Deuze & M. Prenger (Eds.), Making media (pp. 297–306). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcj305r.24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ghajargar, M., & Bardzell, J. (2019). What design education tells us about design theory: A pedagogical genealogy. Digital Creativity, 30(4), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2019.1677723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G. (2017). Design thinking: A method or a gateway into design cognition? she ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.10.009

  • Hanlon, G. (2015). The dark side of management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754581

  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hizi, G. (2021). Becoming role models: Pedagogies of soft skills and affordances of person-making in contemporary China. Ethos, 49(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohl, P., Klünder, J., van Bennekum, A., Lockard, R., Gifford, J., Münch, J., Stupperich, M., & Schneider, K. (2018). Back to the future: Origins and directions of the “Agile Manifesto”—Views of the originators. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-018-0059-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, T. H. (2009). Essays upon some controverted questions (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irani, L. (2018). “Design thinking”: Defending Silicon Valley at the apex of global labor hierarchies. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v4i1.29638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: When old and new media collide. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and innovation management, 22(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023

  • Jones, P. (2004). Raymond Williams’s sociology of culture: A critical reconstruction. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, M. (2014). Introduction. In T. McPherson & M. Kinder (Eds.), Transmedia frictions: The digital, the arts, and the humanities (pp. 3–19). University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, F. A. (2012). There is no software. CTheory, a032. http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=74

  • Kolko, J. (2015). Design thinking comes of age. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotamraju, N. P. (2002). Keeping up: Web design skill and the reinvented worker. Information, Communication and Society, 5, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D., Levine, K., & Manning, N. (1998). Evangelism and Agnosticism in the Take-Up of Information Technology. In M. Henry (Ed.), Using It Effectively: A Guide. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial Labour. In M. Hardt & P. Virno (Eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics (pp. 132–146). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, F. (2015). Middlebroware. The Fibreculture Journal, 25, 89–114. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.25.182.2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, F., & Smirnova, S. (2015). “Keeping up” through teaching and learning media software: “Introducing” Photoshop. Canadian Journal of Communication, 40(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2015v40n2a2810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightman, B. (2002). Huxley and scientific agnosticism: The strange history of a failed rhetorical strategy. The British Journal for the History of Science, 35(3), 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, K., & Wesselius, H. (2017). Once More, with feeling: Design thinking and embodied cognition. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.05.004

  • Losh, E. (2014). From authorship to authoring: Critical literacy, expert users, and proprietary software. Computers and Composition, 33, 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckman, S. (2015). Craft and the creative economy. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lunenfeld, P. (2001). Snap to grid: A user’s guide to digital arts, media, and cultures. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusoli, A. (2021). Make, measure, fail, learn, repeat. Life and work in the start-up episteme. Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCray, W. P. (2020). Making art work: How Cold War engineers and artists forged a new creative culture. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (2001). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industries. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poort, E. (2020). Between the Waterfall wasteland and the Agile outback. IEEE Software, 37(1), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2019.2945611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2017). The invention of creativity: Modern society and the culture of the new (English edition.). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2007). The intangibilities of form: Skill and deskilling in art after the readymade. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, W. (2019). The software arts. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, T. (2020). Design thinking and the new spirit of capitalism (L. Cerami, Trans.). Palgrave Pivot

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebenbrodt, M., & Schöbe, L. (2012). Bauhaus: 1919–1933, Weimar-Dessau-Berlin. Parkstone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siles, I. (2011). From online filter to web format: Articulating materiality and meaning in the early history of blogs. Social Studies of Science, 41, 737–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singerman, H. (1999). Art subjects: Making artists in the American University. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time (R. Beardsworth & G. Collins, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1994). Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2(3), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virno, P. (2004). A Grammar of the multitude: For an analysis of contemporary Forms of Life (I. Bertoletti, J. Cascaito, & A. Casson, Trans.). Semiotext.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virno, P. (2006). The Ambivalence of Disenchantment. In P. Virno & M. Hardt (Eds.), Radical Thought in Italy (NED-New edition, Vol. 7). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1990). Television: Technology and cultural form (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2020). Culture and materialism (2nd ed.). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, R. K. (2012). Project management life cycle models. In Executive’s guide to project management (pp. 23–39). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119202264.ch2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Frédérik Lesage

  2. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Alberto Lusoli

Authors
  1. Frédérik Lesage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alberto Lusoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédérik Lesage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

    Frédérik Lesage

  2. Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Michael Terren

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lesage, F., Lusoli, A. (2024). Figurations of the Tool Agnostic. In: Lesage, F., Terren, M. (eds) Creative Tools and the Softwarization of Cultural Production. Creative Working Lives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45693-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation