Skip to main content

Increasing Access to Undergraduate Research Opportunities at Small Teaching Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Teaching and Research in Political Science

Part of the book series: Political Pedagogies ((PP))

  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

As the laboratory model is becoming increasingly popular in Political Science, what are the best models of adapting this opportunity to an undergraduate teaching institution? Undergraduate research experiences are a high-impact learning practice, but access to these opportunities is often limited. These challenges are exacerbated for faculty at teaching institutions, where funding, research time, and student-led research mentoring opportunities are often more limited. How can faculty at teaching institutions create broader and deeper access to undergraduate research opportunities? This chapter documents the successes and limitations of a student-faculty collaborative research initiative on immigration politics in Nebraska started in August 2019 at Nebraska Wesleyan University, through which students wrote and presented one paper, co-designed a second project, and are co-authoring a blog post on immigration politics pedagogy. This chapter documents how the lab model fits within my research, teaching, and mentoring interests; discusses student learning outcomes; and shares scalability challenges and opportunities. It concludes by offering suggestions to assist other faculty interested in most efficiently and effectively expanding this research opportunity to benefit both students and faculty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Human subjects research was approved by the Nebraska Wesleyan University Institutional Review Board, NWU-IRB#202,001,251-S.

References

  • Barnes, T. D. (2018). Strategies for improving gender diversity in the methods community: Insights from political methodologists and social science research. PS, Political Science & Politics, 51(3), 580–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, K. (2021). Research design as professional development and empowerment: Equipping students to see, analyze, and intervene in political realities. In The Palgrave handbook of political research pedagogy (pp. 151–160): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76955-0_12

  • Bauer, K., Redfern, S., Wang, H., & Woo, S. (2021). Surpassing the wall of Nebraska nice: Analysis of immigration rhetoric in Nebraska journalism. Great Plains Research, 31(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1353/gpr.2021.0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. (2019). Importing the laboratory model to the social sciences: Prospects for improving mentoring of undergraduate researchers. Journal of Political Science Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1505523

  • Becker, M., Graham, B. A., & Zvobgo, K. (2021). The stewardship model: An inclusive approach to undergraduate research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(1), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520001043

  • Buddie, A. M., & Collins, C. L. (2011). Faculty perceptions of undergraduate research. PURM: Perspectives on Mentoring Undergraduate Researchers, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/1513593.1513598

  • Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K. (2016). Why does political science hate American Indians? Perspectives on Politics, 14(4), 1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716002905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, L. A. (2017). The real problem with diversity in political science. Duck of Minerva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiyama, J. (2019). What kinds of departments promote undergraduate research in political science? Journal of Political Science Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2019.1667242

  • Ishiyama, J., & Breuning, M. (2003). Does participation in undergraduate research affect political science students? Politics & Policy, 31(1), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00892.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities, 14(3), 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangum, M. (2022). Collaborating on research with undergraduate students: A comparative institutional-racial analysis. PS: Political Science & Politics, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522001093

  • Nonnemacher, J., & Sokhey, S. W. (2022). Learning by doing: Using an undergraduate research lab to promote diversity and inclusion. PS: Political Science & Politics, 55(2), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521001633

  • Ravecca, P. (2019). The politics of political science: Re-writing Latin American experiences. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Núñez, R. L., Blanco, F., Benenson, J., Cortés-Rivera, J. J., Gomez-Aguinaga, B., Heckler, N., Jamieson, T., Mwarumba, N. (2023). Building inclusion, equity, and diversity into graduate student Coauthorship. PS: Political Science & Politics, 56(1), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000919

  • Shames, S. L., & Wise, T. (2017). Gender, diversity, and methods in political science: A theory of selection and survival biases. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(3), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651700066X

  • Verge, T. (2016). The virtues of engendering quantitative methods courses. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(3), 550–553. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516000962

  • Weinschenk, A. C. (2021). Creating and implementing an undergraduate research lab in political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2020.1795873

  • Zvobgo, K. (2022). Research labs: Concept, utility, and application. In Handbook of research methods in international relations (pp. 729–747). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Bauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bauer, K. (2023). Increasing Access to Undergraduate Research Opportunities at Small Teaching Institutions. In: Butcher, C., Bhasin, T., Gordon, E., Hallward, M.C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Teaching and Research in Political Science. Political Pedagogies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42887-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics