Keywords

1 Introduction

The development of commercial refrigeration system takes energy saving and environmental protection as the main melody. Compressor is the core component of refrigeration system, and its performance directly affects the energy-saving efficiency of the whole system. Inverter scroll compressors are widely used in domestic and commercial refrigeration systems with large capacity, due to their high efficiency, low torque variation, noiseless operation, low vibration and smooth operation. Finding out the internal operating characteristics of inverter scroll compressors at different frequencies is particularly important for high-efficient optimization design of compressors.

Pressure and volume change law test (PV diagram measurement) on the inside of the compressor is an important means to understand the internal working characteristics of the compressor. At present, the existing papers mainly focus on rotary compressors, and there are relatively few studies on inverter scroll compressors.

In this paper, by testing the PV characteristics of the inverter scroll compressor with high and low frequencies, the characteristics of scroll compressors are compared and the relative variation law is analyzed, which provides the basis and reference for the optimization design of scroll compressors at high speed.

2 Theory of Experiment

2.1 Thermodynamic Model of Compression Chambers

For compression chamber, mass and energy conservation equations are deduced to describe the thermodynamics state. And between chambers, an isentropic nozzle model of one-dimensional compressible flow is used to determine the mass and energy exchange from flank and radial clearance.

According to the conservation of mass and energy [1], the equations can be written as:

$$ \frac{{{\text{d}}m}}{{{\text{d}}\theta }} = \frac{1}{\omega }\left( {\mathop {m_{i} }\limits^{ \bullet } - \mathop {m_{o} }\limits^{ \bullet } } \right) $$
(1)
$$ \frac{{{\text{d}}T}}{d\theta } = \frac{{\frac{1}{\omega }\left( {\mathop {m_{i} }\limits^{ \bullet } \left( {h_{i} - h} \right) - \mathop {m_{o} }\limits^{ \bullet } \left( {h_{o} - h} \right)} \right) - \left( {\left( {\frac{\partial h}{{\partial \upsilon }}} \right)_{T} - \left( {\frac{\partial p}{{\partial \upsilon }}} \right)_{T} \frac{V}{m}} \right)\left( {\frac{{{\text{d}}V}}{{{\text{d}}\theta }} - \frac{V}{m}\frac{{{\text{d}}m}}{e\theta }} \right)}}{{m\left( {\frac{\partial h}{{\partial T}}} \right)_{v} - V\left( {\frac{\partial p}{{\partial T}}} \right)_{v} }} $$
(2)

The isentropic nozzle model is used to calculate the mass flow rate through the clearances between fixed and orbiting scroll wrap [2], which can be written as

$$ \mathop m\limits^{ \bullet } = C_{{\text{d}}} \rho_{{{\text{up}}}} A\left( {\frac{2\gamma }{{\gamma - 1}}\frac{{p_{{{\text{up}}}} }}{{\rho_{{{\text{up}}}} }}\left( {\left( {\frac{{p_{{{\text{down}}}} }}{{p_{{{\text{up}}}} }}} \right)^{{\frac{2}{\gamma }}} - \left( {\frac{{p_{{{\text{down}}}} }}{{p_{{{\text{up}}}} }}} \right)^{{\frac{\gamma + 1}{\gamma }}} } \right)} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} {\text{for }}\frac{{p_{{{\text{down}}}} }}{{p_{{{\text{up}}}} }} \ge \left( {\frac{2}{\gamma + 1}} \right)^{{\frac{\gamma }{\gamma - 1}}} $$
(3)
$$ \mathop m\limits^{ \bullet } = C_{{\text{d}}} \rho_{{{\text{up}}}} A\left( {\frac{{\gamma p_{{{\text{up}}}} }}{{\rho_{{{\text{up}}}} }}\left( {\frac{2}{\gamma + 1}} \right)^{{\frac{\gamma + 1}{{\gamma - 1}}}} } \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} {\text{for}}\frac{{p_{{{\text{down}}}} }}{{p_{{{\text{up}}}} }} < \left( {\frac{2}{\gamma + 1}} \right)^{{\frac{\gamma }{\gamma - 1}}} $$
(4)

2.2 Efficiency of Compression Chambers

Based on the law of thermodynamics, the enthalpy difference change during the suction process satisfies the relation of Δh = Δq + Δw. If the heat exchange between the refrigerant and the environment in the suction process is ignored, the flow loss Δw caused by the viscous friction of the refrigerant during the charging process are all converted into heat and absorbed by the refrigerant, now the equation is known as Δq + Δw = 0, so the enthalpy value remains unchanged during the flow process. In addition, the temperature remains constant if h (h = Cp * T) keeps invariant. The pressure of the refrigerant decreases while the temperature remains unchanged, thus the density of coolant decreases. Besides, the aspirated volume of the compressor is fixed, it will inevitably lead to a decrease of inspiratory mass and volumetric efficiency when the density of the refrigerant decreases.

The theoretical mass of refrigerant is denoted by ms = ρs Vs. The pressure (P) somewhere in the suction process can be obtained by PV diagram measurement, subsequently, the density (ρ) can be calculated from the pressure (P), temperature (Ts) and physical property of the refrigerant, then the actual mass can be written as m = ρ Vs [2, 3]. Volume efficiency loss due to flow losses is given by

$$ \eta_{i} = (\rho_{s} V_{s} - \rho_{{}} V_{s} )/ \, (\rho_{s} V_{s} ) = 1 - {\raise0.7ex\hbox{$\rho $} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\rho {\rho_{s} }}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${\rho_{s} }$}} $$
(5)

Figure 1 shows the indicated work division diagram of compressor, where Ps is the theoretical suction pressure, Pd is the theoretical exhaust pressure, Ps1 is the measured suction pressure, Pd1 is the measured exhaust pressure, Vh is the actual effective volume of the compressor, Vd is the discharge port open volume of the compressor, n is the rotary speed, ① is the theoretical work of adiabatic compression, ② is suction pressure loss. ③ represents other losses in the compression process (mainly including under-compression loss, leakage loss, heat loss, etc.), and ④ is the exhaust pressure loss (including loss of over compress, loss of pump body‘s discharge port, the loss of exhaust flow).The pressure loss during the suction and discharge process of the compressor is as follows

$$ \Delta P_{{\text{i}}} = {{\overline{n} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\overline{n} } {60}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {60}}\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{{V_{h} }} [P_{S} - P_{s} (\theta )]{\text{d}}V $$
(6)
$$ \Delta P_{0} = {{\overline{n} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\overline{n} } {60}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {60}}\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{{V_{d} }} [P_{d} (\theta ) - P_{d} ]{\text{d}}V $$
(7)
Fig. 1
A graph of P versus V. The compress process of theory plots a vertical from Ps to P d and a horizontal till V h that rises with a concave-up trend backwards, to meet the horizontal from p d. The compress process of test forms a curve around, emerging from V h, dividing the region in between from 1 to 4.

P-V schematic diagram of scroll compressor

According to the pressure calculation formula, P is defined as

$$ P = P_{{\text{s}}} (V_{{\text{s}}} /V)^{{\text{n}}} $$
(8)

Taking the closure pressure (P0) of suction process and compression index n as unknowns, the P–V data of the compression stage of the test can be used to fit the closure pressure (P0) of suction process and compression index (n) at each operation condition. By substituting the fitted parameters into the pressure calculation formula, the actual pressure change of the compression chambers in the compression stage can be calculated more accurately.

3 Test Method and Equipment

3.1 Testing Compressor

Multiple displacement and pressure sensors need to be installed to monitor pressure and volume changes in PV diagram measurement. The compressor needs to be specially made, which is a detachable compressor with upper and lower covers, as shown in Fig. 2. The data of pressure (P) and displacement (V) are respectively collected by the acquisition card (NI: 9239), and the PV curve diagram of the operation process is obtained by post-processing method.

Fig. 2
A photograph of a testing compressor with detachable lower and upper covers.

Picture of testing compressor

3.2 Pressure Measurement

Pressure sensors (Kulite: XTL-142B-190 M-50barA, USA) are inserted into the fixed scroll of the pump body. Four pressure sensors are arranged in the inner and outer compression chambers of the pump body respectively, and every four sensors monitor a complete compression cycle, as shown in Fig. 3. The connecting wire is connected from the flange plate on the upper cover of the compressor and the experiment is tested in multiple groups.

Fig. 3
An illustration presents the spiral shape of the scroll of the pump body. It presents the inner sensors, fixed scroll, outer sensors, and orbiting scroll.

Location of pressure sensors

3.3 Volume Measurement

By sensing the rotation angle of the gear flange mounted on the compressor with a displacement sensor (Del: DT3010-M, Germany), and then the volume can be obtained by the relevant calculation. The newly designed displacement induction gear flange is assembled on the shafting system, meanwhile, the pressure sensor goes deep into the shell and the wire is connected from the shell flange, as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
2 parts. Left. An illustration presents the gear flange. Right. An illustration presents the compressor, gear flange, location sensor, adjust nut, O-ring, and connection.

Illustration of location sensor

4 Results and Discussion

4.1 Experiment Condition

According to the enterprise standard, the conditions in Table 1 are selected for test comparison, and the pressure ratio is from large to small. The ultrahigh electric motor frequency(Full text abbreviation: frequency) of 199 Hz is taken as the upper limit, and the PV curves of high and low frequencies under various working conditions are compared respectively to analyze the loss ratio changes of each module with high and low frequencies(unit volume:98 cc). All experiments are implemented in a compressor calorimeter.

Table 1 Operation condition for experiments

4.2 Data Analysis

The test results are shown in Figs. 5, 6 and 7 (All the measurement results of an inner compression chamber). Under the high-frequency working condition 1 (Fig. 5), and the actual exhaust pressure at the theoretical discharge angle is lower than the theoretical exhaust pressure. Meanwhile, the pressure rises sharply after the opening of the discharge port, there is an under-compression phenomenon of high-pressure gas return, and the under-compression phenomenon is aggravated under ultra-high frequency condition. On the other hand, the actual suction pressure is lower than the theoretical suction pressure and with suction loss. Under the condition of ultra-high frequency, suction loss increases. The actual exhaust pressure at the theoretical discharge angle of working condition 2 and 3 is higher than the theoretical exhaust pressure. When the pressure reaches the exhaust pressure, the orbiting scroll does not reach the exhaust angle, and there is the over-compression phenomenon. With the increase of frequency, the over-compression phenomenon becomes worse [4].

Fig. 5
A graph of pressure in megapascals versus volume in cubic millimeters. Isentropy has a trapezium pattern with 3 sides where test 130 hertz, test 199 hertz, and calculation are plotted around it with slight fluctuations between 0.5 and 2.5 on the y-axis, and 0 and 25000 on the x-axis, approximately.

PV diagram of condition 1

Fig. 6
A graph of pressure versus volume in cubic millimeters. Isentropy has a trapezium pattern with 3 sides where test 65 hertz, test 106 hertz, and calculation are plotted around it with slight fluctuations between 0.9 and 1.9 on the y-axis, and 0 and 25000 on the x-axis. Values are estimated.

PV diagram of condition 2

Fig. 7
A graph of pressure in megapascals versus volume in cubic millimeters. Isentropy has a trapezium pattern with 3 sides where test 28 hertz, test 46 hertz, and calculation are partially overlapping with it with slight fluctuations between 0.8 and 2 on the y-axis, and 0 and 25000 on the x-axis.

PV diagram of condition 3

The actual suction pressure in low frequency is higher than the theoretical suction pressure, and the “precompression” characteristic phenomenon of scroll is obvious, and the “precompression” phenomenon decreases with the increase of frequency. (Precompression: When the suction chamber of scroll compressor is close to closure, the volume of chamber gradually decreases, and the gap at the closure point of the profile line also gradually decreases. When the gap decreases to a certain extent, the influence of leakage through the gap is small, and the suction chamber can be considered as a closed chamber. With the rotation of the orbiting scroll, the volume of the chamber gradually decreases and the pressure gradually rises, that is, the compression has begun before the inspiratory closure.

By calculating the area of each loss module in Figs. 5, 6 and 7 and summarizing statistics, the comparison Figure of loss ratio is obtained, as shown in Figs. 8, 9 and 10. The ratio of over (under)-compression and the discharge loss of pump body keepsz direct ratio with frequency, the loss of exhaust flow keep direct ratio with frequency and only occurs in mid-low frequencies. The other losses (leakage and heat loss, etc.) are keep inverse ratio with frequency. Under the ultra-high-frequency condition 1, the over (under)-compression and discharge loss account for the main part of the total loss. The indicated efficiency (The ratio of theoretical work of adiabatic cycle to actual cycle) does not change significantly in low frequency, decreases in high frequency, and decrease range enhances in ultra-high frequency, as shown in Fig. 11.

Fig. 8
A grouped bar graph of loss proportion versus various parameters. The following are the estimated % values of 130 hertz and 199 hertz, respectively. Discharge port of pump body. 14.3, 17.2. Exhaust flow. 13.9, 31.8. Over compress. 35.3, 31.4. Others. 36.5, 19.6.

Loss ratio of condition 1

Fig. 9
A grouped bar graph of loss proportion versus various parameters. The following are the estimated % values of 65 hertz and 106 hertz, respectively. Discharge port of pump body. 34.6, 38.8. Exhaust flow. 0.0, 32.5. Over compress. 6.0, 3.9. Others. 59.4, 24.8.

Loss ratio of condition 2

Fig. 10
A grouped bar graph of loss proportion versus various parameters. The following are the estimated % values of 28 hertz and 46 hertz, respectively. Discharge port of pump body. 20.1, 26.1. Exhaust flow. 0.0, 0.0. Over compress. 15.1, 28.6. Others. 6.4.8, 45.3.

Loss ratio of condition 3

Fig. 11
A graph of efficiency versus frequency. Following are the beginning and ending percentage values, respectively. Condition 1. Simulation. 91.4, 91.1. Experiment. 88.5, 86.7. Condition 2. Simulation. 94.4, 94.4. Experiment. 92.3, 88.5. Condition 3. Simulation. 95.2, 95.2. Experiment. 89.8, 89.8.

Indicated efficiency comparison

5 Conclusions

  1. (1)

    The over-compression and under-compression of scroll compressor are difficult to avoid under various working conditions. With the increase of frequency, the actual discharge angle increases.

  2. (2)

    Different frequencies have a great impact on suction-exhaust process. The deviation of suction and exhaust conditions increases in ultra-high frequency conditions, so the suction and exhaust structures need to be redesigned and optimized.

  3. (3)

    The proportion of exhaust loss and over (under)-compression loss are keep direct ratio with the frequency, and the proportion of ultra-high frequency accounts for the main part of the total loss. There is no significant change in indicated efficiency at low frequencies, while indicated efficiency decreases at high frequency and it decreases intensified at ultra-high frequency.