Abstract
This chapter explores how coworking space operators in Aotearoa New Zealand create places that foster social change. Coworking spaces have become increasingly important sites for collaboration, innovation, and networking, as the digitalisation of work leads to a reconfiguration of work, workplace and workers. The digital geographies of work, however, are largely driven by a hegemonic and techno-capitalist stance that marginalises and devalues principles of care, affect and emotion under a capitalist neoliberal society. This chapter uses an embodied geographies of care approach to look at affective principles and practices shaping embodied experiences in coworking spaces. By drawing on interviews with operators and ethnographic accounts of 11 coworking spaces visited in Aotearoa New Zealand from March to June 2021, I explore the transformative potential of coworking spaces as places of care. In an increasingly digitalised and individualised world, this chapter aims to contribute to existing research by exploring embodied everyday practices of care in coworking spaces as extended spaces of care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
BizDojo was a New Zealand owned start-up, and after going into liquidation bought by global company IWG (NZ Herald, 2018, February 5).
References
Adams-Hutcheson, G., & Johnston, L. (2019). Flourishing in fragile academic work spaces and learning environments: Feminist geographies of care and mentoring. Gender, Place & Culture, 26(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1596885
Alam, A., & Houston, D. (2020). Rethinking care as alternate infrastructure. Cities, 100, 102662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102662
Bayleys (2022). Flexible office options provide freedom of choice for businesses. Available at https://www.bayleys.co.nz/insightsanddata/commercial
Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2021). What do we know about co-working spaces? Trends and challenges ahead. Sustainability, 13(3), 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031416
Brinks, V. (2022). Fluid objects? An attempt to conceptualise the global rise of “coworking spaces”. Area. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12778
Bryson, S. A. (2021). An ethic of care? Academic administration and pandemic policy. Qualitative Social Work, 20(1–2), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020973386
Conradson, D. (2003). Spaces of care in the city: The place of a community drop-in centre. Social & Cultural Geography, 4(4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936032000137939
Eisler, R., & Eisler, R. T. (2008). The real wealth of nations: Creating a caring economics. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives: Self, excess and nature. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887042
Foertsch, C. (2019). 2019 State of Coworking: Over 2 Million Coworking Space Members Expected. Deskmag. Available at https://www.deskmag.com/en/coworking-news/2019-state-of-coworking-spaces-2-million-members-growth-crisis-market-report-survey-study
Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 15(1), 193–205.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913250809082
Guttentag, D. (2015). Airbnb: disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current issues in Tourism, 18(12), 1192–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.827159
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Hodgetts, D., Rua, M., Groot, S., Hopner, V., Drew, N., King, P., & Blake, D. (2021). Relational ethics meets principled practice in community research engagements to understand and address homelessness. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(4), 1980–1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22586
Hoskins, T. K. (2012). A fine risk: Ethics in Kaupapa Maori politics. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 85–99.
Howell, T. (2022). Coworking spaces: An overview and research agenda. Research Policy, 51(2), 104447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104447
Ishitsuka, A. M. (2020). Visual encounters in global Shanghai. On the desirability of bodies in a coworking space. China Perspectives, 2020(3), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.10416
Lawrence, T. B., & Maitlis, S. (2012). Care and possibility: Enacting an ethic of care through narrative practice. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 641–663. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0466
Lawson, V. (2007). Geographies of care and responsibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00520.x
Massey, D. (2005). For space. Sage.
McDowell, L. (2004). Work, workfare, work/life balance and an ethic of care. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph478oa
McDowell, L. (2011). Capital culture: Gender at work in the city. John Wiley & Sons.
Power, E. R., & Williams, M. J. (2020). Cities of care: A platform for urban geographical care research. Geography Compass, 14(1), e12474. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12474
Puig de La Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds (Vol. 41). University of Minnesota Press.
Richardson, L. (2017). Sharing as a postwork style: Digital work and the co-working office. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx002
Richardson, L. (2018). Feminist geographies of digital work. Progress in Human Geography, 42(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516677177
Richardson, L. (2021). Coordinating office space: Digital technologies and the platformization of work. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820959677
Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. Sage.
Sargent, A. C., Yavorsky, J. E., & Sandoval, R. G. (2020). Organizational logic in coworking spaces: Inequality regimes in the new economy. Gender & Society, 35(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220974691
Stats NZ (2018). Census 2018 New Zealand. Available at https://www.stats.govt.nz/tools/2018-census-place-summaries/new-zealand
Stats NZ (2021). Subnational population estimates (urban rural). Available at https://nzdotstat.stats.govt.nz/wbos/Index.aspx?_ga=2.15140594.596012437.1693754122-1634502971.1693754122
Tronto, J. (2017). There is an alternative: Homines curans and the limits of neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring, 1(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788217X14866281687583
William, I. (2020). Global capitalism post-pandemic. Race & class, 62(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396820951999
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Methorst, J.J. (2023). Coworking Spaces in Aotearoa New Zealand: Embodied Geographies of Care in Pandemic Times. In: Merkel, J., Pettas, D., Avdikos, V. (eds) Coworking Spaces. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42268-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42268-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42267-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42268-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)