Abstract
Authoritarian actors wish to undermine democracy by pretending to uphold its principles while covertly subverting them. This results in political systems that hold potentially competitive elections but undermine democratic norms by various authoritarian means. Such political systems are often labelled ‘illiberal democracies’, but they should not even be granted the veneer of democracy, as their procedures significantly skew elections. Instead, illiberal regimes should be called authoritarian to more accurately reflect reality. That said, there meaningful distinctions that can be made between various forms of authoritarianism. Compared to systems of closed authoritarianism, so-called illiberal democracies are more democratic in many ways, so the titles of electoral authoritarianism and competitive authoritarianism are more fitting. Authoritarian strategies are varied. They can involve seizing control of the media, undermining the rule of law, or mobilizing state resources for campaigning. Authoritarian actors can also improve their chances with technical decisions: enacting voter suppression, redrawing district boundaries, or changing electoral rules, for instance. However, more blatantly authoritarian strategies such as banning political opposition outright and widespread voter fraud are more closely aligned with closed authoritarianism. Identifying authoritarian strategies is vital to opposing them sufficiently early and hopefully preventing the slide towards authoritarian government.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451.
Coppedge, M., et al. (2011). Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 247–267.
Freedom House. (2021a). Democracy Under Siege. Freedom in the World. Retrieved November 28, 2021, from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2021-02/FIW2021_World_02252021_FINAL-web-upload.pdf
Freedom House. (2021b). Freedom in the World 2021, Hungary. Freedom in the World. Retrieved November 29, 2021, from https://freedomhouse.org/country/hungary/freedom-world/2021
Freedom House. (2021c). Freedom in the World 2021, Poland. Freedom in the World. Retrieved November 29, 2021, from https://freedomhouse.org/country/poland/freedom-world/2021
Freedom House. (2021d). Freedom in the World 2021, United States. Freedom in the World. Retrieved November 29, 2021, from https://freedomhouse.org/country/united-states/freedom-world/2021
Freedom House. (2021e). Freedom in the World 2021, Methodology. Freedom in the World. Retrieved November 28, 2021, from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2021-02/FreedomInTheWorld_2021_Methodology_Checklist_of_Questions.pdf
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2002). The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65.
Meyer-Resende, M. (2018, June 13). Is Europe’s Problem Illiberal Majoritarianism or Creeping Authoritarianism? Carnegie Europe. Retrieved November 28, 2021, from https://carnegieeurope.eu/2018/06/13/is-europe-s-problem-illiberal-majoritarianism-or-creeping-authoritarianism-pub-76587
Rhoden, T. F. (2015). The Liberal in Liberal Democracy. Democratization, 22(3), 560–578.
Schedler, A. (2002). The Menu of Manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36–50.
Tóth, C. (2014, July 29). Full text of Viktor Orbán’s Speech at Băile Tuşnad (Tusnádfürdő) of 26 July 2014. The Budapest Beacon. Retrieved November 28, 2021, from https://budapestbeacon.com/full-text-of-viktor-orbans-speech-at-baile-tusnad-tusnadfurdo-of-26-july-2014/
Varieties of Democracy. (2021a). Democracy Report 2021: Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Reports. Retrieved November 28, 2021, from https://www.vdem.net/en/publications/democracy-reports/
Varieties of Democracy. (2021b). Methodology v11.1. Democracy Reports. Retrieved November 28, 2021, from https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/reference-material-v11/
Zakaria, F. (1997, November/December). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22–43.
Acknowledgements
This chapter was supported by the Kone Foundation as a part of my doctoral thesis project: Challenges to Liberal Democracy: The Normative Significance of the Deterioration of Institutions and Practices.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ropponen, J. (2023). Between Democracy and Authoritarianism: The Illiberal Challenge. In: Lagerspetz, E., Pulkkinen, O. (eds) Between Theory and Practice: Essays on Criticism and Crises of Democracy. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41397-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41397-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41396-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41397-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)