Skip to main content

Assessment of Sustainable Energy Resources with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic AHP-MULTIMOORA Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (INFUS 2023)

Abstract

Building a sustainable development path in energy, supporting the transition to a low-carbon energy system, and promoting clean energy are among the critical components for sustainable energy and energy efficiency. Sustainable energy has particular importance in diversifying resources, meeting energy demand with greener options, and making better use of domestic resources to achieve flexible energy systems. This study aims to assess sustainable energy resources with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic (HFL) Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. The Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets (HFLTS) approach is used to convey Decision Makers' (DMs') evaluations by addressing the effort of expressing concepts through crisp numbers and ambiguity. The weights of the assessment criteria are computed with the HFL Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, whereas the sustainable energy resources are evaluated with the updated form of HFL Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MULTIMOORA) method. A case study for this evaluation problem is provided to illustrate the power of the proposed methodology. Finally, the application results are given, and future remarks are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobson, M.Z., Delucchi, M.A.: A path to sustainable energy by 2030. Sci. Am. 301(5), 58–65 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paris Agreement: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/what-is-the-paris-agreement. Last accessed 2 Dec 2021

  3. Sandalkhan, B., Bolukbasi, S., Selcuk, F.: Sürdürülebilir Gelecek icin Sürdürülebilir Enerji – Kısa ve Orta Vadeli Öneriler (Sustainable Energy for Sustainable Future – Short and Medium Term Recommendations). TUSIAD & BCG (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rodríguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Büyüközkan, G., Karabulut, Y., Mukul, E.: A novel renewable energy selection model for United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Energy 165, 290–302 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Büyüközkan, G., Güler, M.: A combined hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach for supply chain analytics tool evaluation. Applied Soft Computing, 112 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oberschmidt, J., Geldermann, J., Ludwig, J., Schmehl, M.: Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 4, 183–212 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Krisciukaitienė, I., Balezentis, A.: Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 3302–3311 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luthra, S., Kumar, S., Garg, D., Haleem, A.: Barriers to renewable/sustainable energy technologies adoption: Indian perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41, 762–776 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghenai, C., Albawab, M., Bettayeb, M.: Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method. Renew. Energy 146, 580–597 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nsafon, B.E.K., Butu, H.M., Owolabi, A.B., Roh, J.W., Suh, D., Huh, J.S.: Integrating multi-criteria analysis with PDCA cycle for sustainable energy planning in Africa: application to hybrid mini-grid system in Cameroon. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 37, 100628 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, H., Rodríguez, R.M.: A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 258, 220–238 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. De Liu, P., Guan, Z.L.: Hybrid multiple attribute decision making method based on 2-tuple. Kongzhi Yu Juece/Control Decis. 24, 3716–3724 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Erdoğan, M., Kaya, İ: A combined fuzzy approach to determine the best region for a nuclear power plant in Turkey. Appl. Soft Comput. 39, 84–93 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Büyüközkan, G., Güleryüz, S.: Evaluation of renewable energy resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations. Energy 123, 149–163 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Büyüközkan, G., Karabulut, Y., Güler, M.: Strategic renewable energy source selection for turkey with hesitant fuzzy MCDM method. In: Kahraman, C., Kayakutlu, G. (eds.) Energy Management—Collective and Computational Intelligence with Theory and Applications. SSDC, vol. 149, pp. 229–250. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75690-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. WEC Energy Group: Pathway to a Clean Energy Future (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Büyüközkan, G., Güleryüz, S.: A new GDM based AHP framework with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations for renewable energy planning. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27(6), 3181–3195 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of industry professionals. This work has been supported by the Scientific Research Projects Commission of Galatasaray University under grant number FOA-2021–1059 and FOA-2023–1181.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merve Güler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mukul, E., Güler, M., Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Assessment of Sustainable Energy Resources with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic AHP-MULTIMOORA Methods. In: Kahraman, C., Sari, I.U., Oztaysi, B., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Tolga, A.Ç. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. INFUS 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 759. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39777-6_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics