Skip to main content

Discovering Cinema Typologies in Urban Cinema Cultures: Comparing Programming Strategies in Antwerp and Amsterdam, 1952–1972

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Comparative New Cinema Histories

Abstract

Recent scholarly work on cinema’s past has shown that the audience’s leisure and cinema-going activities were firmly rooted in the sociocultural geographies of cities. This chapter aims at further developing this line of research by experimenting with a bottom-up, data-driven approach to analyse the typology of cinemas in Amsterdam and Antwerp in 1952, 1962 and 1972. It asks if such an approach can provide us with new ways of identifying clusters of cinemas that share a set of characteristics which may or may not be in line with existing classifications. The results of the analysis invite a rethinking of the type ‘premiere theatre’, the relation between run order and seating capacity, and the centre-periphery distinction. The chapter also shows that a ‘scalable’ research framework can provide us with new perspectives on the local cinema cultures that shaped modern identities in the post-war period in their own, unique ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A rich encyclopaedic source that is mainly based on newspaper articles, trade journals and interviews, is Richard van Bueren’s three-part history of individual Amsterdam cinemas (van Bueren, 1996, 1998). Karel Dibbets’ thesis (1980) covers the whole of the Netherlands, but is also an important source for post-war Amsterdam. Moreover, some publications exist about individual cinemas (e.g. Dolfsma, 1985; van Dijk, 2013; Visser, 2012), but a synthetic study of (post-war) Amsterdam cinema life is lacking.

  2. 2.

    Various partial explanations for the difference in market size exist (Sedgwick et al. 2012); a full discussion goes beyond the scope of this paper.

  3. 3.

    The datasets, code and output were gathered in a Jupyter notebook which we ran on the Google Colab service. The notebook and the data are available in a dedicated GitLab repository: https://gitlab.com/uvacreate/cinema-context/2021-cinema-programming-amsterdam-antwerp.

  4. 4.

    Using the k-means clustering algorithm, https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/clustering.html#k-means.

  5. 5.

    A full discussion of the motivation for and operationalisation of those variables is provided in the ReadMe section of the GitLab repository: https://gitlab.com/uvacreate/cinema-context/2021-cinema-programming-amsterdam-antwerp/-/blob/master/README.md.

  6. 6.

    Note that this can indicate the same feature that is screened for several weeks; these would be counted as distinct weekly screenings in these graphs.

  7. 7.

    The motivation for this prolongation of specific titles is unclear and requires further research.

  8. 8.

    It should be noted that we only have data for single calendar years, so the data do not show how long a film had been on the market in the city before January 1. To reduce this bias, we have excluded films that were screened before February from this analysis of the run orders.

  9. 9.

    As defined in the ReadMe section of the GitLab repository: https://gitlab.com/uvacreate/cinema-context/2021-cinema-programming-amsterdam-antwerp/-/blob/master/README.md.

  10. 10.

    We have defined recent as not older than two years, based on the production year mentioned by IMDB.

  11. 11.

    See https://gitlab.com/uvacreate/cinema-context/2021-cinema-programming-amsterdam-antwerp.

  12. 12.

    Most likely these are films that only show once in the city or premiered before January 1.

  13. 13.

    The two cinemas in Amsterdam East, Van Swinden and Bio, in terms of their decentralised location could also be expected in cluster 0 there (see below), but are probably grouped in this cluster because they are close to each other, as the cinemas in this cluster share a similar distance to other cinemas as the most distinguishing feature.

  14. 14.

    Film Listings, Het Parool, 8 March 1972, p. 22. Retrieved August 26, 2022, from https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=ABCDDD:010833937:mpeg21:p022

  15. 15.

    Film listings, Het Parool, 27 September 1972, p. 12. Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=ABCDDD:010837225

References

  • Baptist, V., Noordegraaf, J., & van Oort, T. (2021). A digital toolkit to detect audiences of the silent era: Scalable perspectives on film exhibition and consumption in Amsterdam neighbourhoods (1907–1928). Studies in European Cinema, 18(3), 252–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. (2003). Comparative history. In S. Berger, H. Feldner, & K. Passmore (Eds.), Writing history: Theory and practice (pp. 161–179). Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biltereyst, D. (2018). Sex cinemas, limit transgression and the aura of ‘forbiddenness’: The emergence of risqués cinemas and Cinema Leopold in Ghent, Belgium, 1945–1954. Film Studies, 18(1), 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biltereyst, D., Maltby, R., & Meers, P. (2019). The Routledge companion to new cinema history. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biltereyst, D., & Meers, P. (2016). New cinema history and the comparative mode: Reflections on comparing historical cinema cultures. Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 11, 13–32. https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.11.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biltereyst, D., & Meers, P. (2020). Comparative, entangled, parallel and ‘other’ cinema histories. Another reflection on the comparative mode within new cinema history. TMG Journal for Media History, 23(1–2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (1962). Bevolking der gemeenten van Nederland op 1 januari 1962. W. de Haan. https://hdl.handle.net/21.12131/120851730

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibbets, K. (1980). Bioscoopketens in Nederland: Economische Concentratie en Geografische Spreiding van een Bedrijfstak, 1928–1977 [Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam]. http://www.academia.edu/download/32768852/Karel_Dibbets_-_Bioscoopketens_in_Nederland_1980.pdf

  • Dibbets, K. (2010). Cinema Context and the genes of film history. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 8(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2010.499784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolfsma, P. J. M. (1985). Uit de illegaliteit naar de studie. De ontstaansgeschiedenis van de Stichting Onderlinge Studenten Steun en haar bioscoop. Kriterion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducatteeuw, V., Biltereyst, D., Meers, P., Verbruggen, C., Moreels, D., Noordegraaf, J., Chambers, S., De Potter, P., Cachet, T., Franck, N., & Deroo, F. (2023). Critical reflections on cinema belgica: The database for new cinema history in Belgium. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 9(0), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis (5th ed.). Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Film Listings. (1972a, March 8). Het Parool, p. 22. Retrieved August 26, 2022, from https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=ABCDDD:010833937:mpeg21:p022

  • Film Listings. (1972b, September 27). Het Parool, p. 12. Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=ABCDDD:010837225

  • Gomery, D. (2005). The Hollywood studio system: A history. British Film Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jernudd, Å., & Lundmark, M. (2020). The persistence of society-driven engagement in Swedish cinema: A locational analysis, 1936–2016. TMG Journal for Media History, 23(1–2), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisjes, I., van Oort, T., Lotze, K., Staliunaite, I., Verbeek, J., Beelen, K., & Noordegraaf, J. (2020). DIGIFIL Final Report. University of Amsterdam, CREATE. https://doi.org/10.21942/UVA.12651683.V1.

  • Lotze, K. (2020). Antwerpen Kinemastad. A mixed-method investigation into film exhibition and experiences of cinemagoing in Antwerp (1945–1995) with a focus on the Rex cinema group [Doctoral dissertation, Antwerp University].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, K., & Meers, P. (2013). ‘They don’t need me in heaven … there are no cinemas there, ye know’: Cinema culture in Antwerp (Belgium) and the empire of Georges Heylen, 1945–75. In K. Aveyard & A. Moran (Eds.), Watching films: New perspectives on movie-going, exhibition and reception (pp. 223–244). Intellect.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marache, C. (2016). Cinema and social life in the rural Gironde: Insights from an oral history project. In J. Thissen & C. Zimmermann (Eds.), Cinema beyond the city: Small-towns & rural film culture in Europe (pp. 105–116). British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek. (1963). 31 december 1961 Volkstelling. Deel I—Bevolkingscijfers. Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Energie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordegraaf, J., Lotze, K., & Boter, J. (2018). Writing cinema histories with digital databases: The case of cinema context. TMG Journal for Media History, 21(2), 106–126. https://www.tmgonline.nl/article/10.18146/2213-7653.2018.369/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nora, P. (1984). Les lieux de mémoire. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafort-Overduin, C., Lotze, K., Jernudd, Å., & van Oort, T. (2020). Moving films: Visualising film flow in three European cities in 1952. TMG Journal for Media History, 23(1–2), 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafort-Overduin, C., Sedgwick, J., & Van de Vijver, L. (2018). Identifying cinema cultures and audience preferences: A comparative analysis of audience choice and popularity in three medium-sized northern European cities in the mid-1930s. TMG Journal for Media History, 21(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.18146/2213-7653.2018.340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, L. M. (2020). Screening ‘good neighbors’: The educational uses of Julien Bryan’s Latin American shorts along the US circuits of 16mm, 1940–1947. TMG Journal for Media History, 23(1–2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2014). Cities: A window into larger and smaller worlds. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, J., Pafort-Overduin, C., & Boter, J. (2012). Explanations for the restrained development of the Dutch cinema market in the 1930s. Enterprise & Society, 13(3), 634–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoodin, E. (2020). Paris in the dark: Going to the movies in the city of light, 1930–1950. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snelson, T. (2016). Where the exceptional and the everyday meet: Exploring cinema culture in British seaside towns. In J. Thissen & C. Zimmermann (Eds.), Cinema beyond the city: Small-towns & rural film culture in Europe (pp. 52–64). British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, J. (2016). Film consumers in the country: The culture and business of small-town and rural cinemagoing in the Netherlands. In J. Thissen & C. Zimmermann (Eds.), Cinema beyond the city: Small-towns & rural film culture in Europe (pp. 87–104). British Film Institute.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, J., & Zimmermann, C. (2016). Cinema beyond the city: Small-towns & rural film culture in Europe. British Film Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treveri Gennari, D., Hipkins, D., & O’Rawe, C. (2018). Rural cinema exhibition and audiences in a global context. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treveri Gennari, D., & Sedgwick, J. (2015). Memories in context: The social and economic function of cinema in 1950s Rome. Film History, 27(2), 76–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treveri Gennari, D., Van de Vijver, L., & Ercole, P. (2021). Defining a typology of cinemas across 1950s Europe. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 18(2), 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bueren, R. (1996). Saturday night at the movies: Het Grote Amsterdamse Bioscopenboek. Eerste Deel A-D. NCAD uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bueren, R. (1998). Saturday night at the movies: Het Grote Amsterdamse Bioscopenboek. Eerste Deel 2+3 E-Z. Lecuona.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, H. (2013). Eerst zien, dan geloven: 100 jaar cinema op Prinsengracht 452. Boekenbent.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oort, T. (2007). Film en het moderne leven in Limburg. Het bioscoopwezen tussen commercie en katholieke cultuurpolitiek (1909–1929) [Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht].

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oort, T. (2016a). ‘Coming up this weekend’: Ambulant film exhibition in the Netherlands. In J. Thissen & C. Zimmermann (Eds.), Cinema beyond the city: Small-towns & rural film culture in Europe (pp. 149–164). British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oort, T. (2016b). Industrial organization of film exhibitors in the low countries: Comparing the Netherlands and Belgium, 1945–1960. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 37(3), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2016.1157294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oort, T., & Noordegraaf, J. (2020). The cinema context database on film exhibition and distribution in the Netherlands: A critical guide. Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/24523666-00502008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oort, T., & Whitehead, J. L. (2020). Common ground: Comparative histories of cinema audiences. TMG Journal for Media History, 23(1–2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Steen, O., & Beyen, M. (2007). Stiefkinderen van de Seksuele Revolutie: Seksbioscopen in de Antwerpse Stationsbuurt, 1950–1975. In D. Biltereyst & P. Meers (Eds.), De Verlichte Stad: Over Bioscopen, Filmbezoek en Filmcultuur in Vlaanderen (pp. 257–269). LannooCampus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (2012). Samen naar The Movies: 100 Jaar Bioscoop op de Haarlemmerdijk 161. The Movies Art House Cinemas & Film Distribution BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildiers, C. (1956). De kinema verovert de Scheldestad. VVKB.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Noordegraaf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Noordegraaf, J., van Oort, T., Lotze, K., Biltereyst, D., Meers, P., Kisjes, I. (2024). Discovering Cinema Typologies in Urban Cinema Cultures: Comparing Programming Strategies in Antwerp and Amsterdam, 1952–1972. In: Treveri Gennari, D., Van de Vijver, L., Ercole, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Comparative New Cinema Histories. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38789-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics