Abstract
Climate change is having a major impact on the natural world. Waterlogging occurs when free water covers the soil surface of crops. As an abiotic stress, flooding has a significant impact on around 16% of agricultural production regions globally. Both growth and yield of agricultural crops are gradually reduced due to harsh environmental conditions. Flooding disturbs the physiochemical properties of the soil that ultimately reduce the growth and physiological characteristics of the crops. Waterlogging induces oxygen loss barriers, which alter the uptake mechanism of nutrients. By developing root systems and secondary aerenchyma, the effects of waterlogging can be alleviated. Under hypoxic conditions, formation of the aerenchyma increases in most cereal crops. Some plants produce metabolic energy through the fermentation process in response to hypoxia rather than through oxidative respiration. This chapter will help understand the effects of waterlogging on crops and provide solutions to mitigate these effects to promote plant growth and productivity. To fulfill the food requirements of the growing world, it is mandatory to grow waterlogging-tolerant crops.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
One of the most significant stresses that plants encounters is waterlogging, which inhibits aerobic respiration growth, particularly vegetative growth and seed germination. Waterlogging stress causes plants to regulate their morphological structure, energy expenditure, endogenous hormone production, and signaling techniques (Ali et al. 2013). Waterlogging occurs when free water saturates the upper layer of the soil (Ashraf et al. 2011; Kaur et al. 2018). By combining water absorption by the roots and transpiration from the leaves, plants can grow normally. Adequate water is a necessity for typical plant growth; however, saturation of the soil’s water-holding capacity or even oversaturation easily leads to waterlogging. Inhibition of root respiration and accumulation of toxins in case of waterlogging stress has a negative impact not only on vegetative growth but also on reproductive growth, ultimately leading to yield losses or even to complete crop failures (Zhou et al. 2007; Javaid et al. 2022a, b). Closure of the stomata during waterlogging as well as chlorophyll breakdown, leaf senescence, and yellowing make leaves less able to absorb light, which ultimately causes a decrease in the photosynthetic rate (Yan et al. 2018). Despite the reality that most plants struggle when they are flooded, they can adapt to the harm imposed by such environmental stresses using a variety of techniques (Doupis et al. 2017; Yin et al. 2019). The hypoxic condition in the rhizosphere reduces the oxygen intake by creating an anaerobic environment, which further results in plant mortality (Fukao et al. 2019). Plants’ ability to tolerate waterlogging depends on their ability to tolerate anaerobiosis and chemical toxicity (Liu et al. 2020; Javaid et al. 2022b). Heavy rainfall and inadequate soil drainage are two of the main causes of waterlogging (Sundgren et al. 2018). Under waterlogging conditions, hypoxia, or a lack of oxygen, is a significant contributor to damage (Sanghera and Jamwal 2019; Javaid et al. 2020).
In plants, waterlogging has drastic effects, as shown in Fig. 11.1. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), including singlet oxygen and superoxide radicals, are produced in large quantities as a result of anaerobic respiration brought on by waterlogging (Zheng et al. 2017; Mehmood et al. 2018). Production of ROS initially aids in adaptive responses, including the development of the aerenchyma and adventitious roots, but excessive ROS under waterlogging stress causes severe oxidative damage (Shahzad et al. 2018; Tyagi et al. 2022). The gas exchange between plant roots and the atmosphere is severely hampered by waterlogging (Wollmer et al. 2018). The roots switch from aerobic respiration to anaerobic fermentation when the oxygen in soggy soil is quickly depleted, and CO2 and ethylene concentrations rise. This has an adverse effect on several metabolic processes in plants, including the root cells’ ability to synthesize adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (Pampana et al. 2016; Kaur et al. 2020). Therefore, waterlogging hinders mitochondrial respiration and diffusion of oxygen in plant tissues. This significantly slows down plants’ regular physiological and biochemical processes (Phukan et al. 2016; Sarwar et al. 2018).
According to estimates, 12% of the world’s arable land may experience regular flooding, which would reduce crop yields by about 20% (Kubik and Maurel 2016). The Yangtze watershed, the plains of Huang-Huai-Hai, Sanjiang, and Songnen in China, and irrigated areas of the United States, India, Pakistan, Argentina, and Europe are among the places where soil waterlogging is predicted to become more frequent and severe in the near future as a result of global climate change (Ploschuk et al. 2018). Waterlogging is a major hazard worldwide, impacting 16% of American soils as well as agricultural regions in Russia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, China, and India (Manik et al. 2019).
One of the main abiotic stressors that significantly lowers agricultural output and has become a serious issue globally is waterlogging (Zhang et al. 2016; Jia et al. 2019). Around 17 million square kilometers of land are at risk of flooding, according to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (Leonardo 2019). Improved waterlogging tolerance is one of the main goals of barley breeding programmers in China and Japan, and, with the anticipated climate change, its significance will also grow in northern Europe (Karimi et al. 2018). Depending on the stage of growth, at present, waterlogging is said to diminish grain production by 20–25% or more (Ramirez-Cabral et al. 2016; Shrestha et al. 2021).
In all, 25% of the irrigated land in Pakistan has been impacted by salt and waterlogging. Moreover, 6.17 MH of land have been affected by temporary flooding or chronic waterlogging and 1.16 MH of the land have salt problems in addition to waterlogging problems (Dollinger and Jose 2018). In Pakistan, 230 MH of agricultural land are irrigated, and around 20% of the area, or 45 million hectares, is salty soil. According to estimates, waterlogging affects between 0.2 and 0.4% of all farmed lands each year as a result of poor management techniques (Harris et al. 2016).
Submergence is one of the abiotic stresses that affects 10–16% of soils and reduces the yields of the most important agricultural crops by about 80% (Liliane and Charles 2020). Being sessile, plants are vulnerable to a variety of abiotic stressors, including waterlogging, drought, salinity, heat, cold, and acidity, which can reduce production by 30–100%, depending on their severity (Choudhary et al. 2018). Due to the accelerating rate of global climate change, waterlogging will pose a significant threat to modern agriculture in the future, offering a challenge to researchers for the creation of submergence-tolerant crop cultivars with improving yield and quality (Hartman et al. 2019). In the past few decades, climate change has raised the likelihood of the occurrence of extreme weather events like droughts and flooding (Stott et al. 2016). According to estimates, flooding affects 10–12% of the world’s agricultural regions, resulting in losses of more than $74 billion each year (Menéndez et al. 2020). Depending on the duration of the waterlogging, the type of soil, the varieties, and the stage of plant development, the yield reduction caused by waterlogging ranges from 20% to 25% (Tong et al. 2021), as shown in Fig. 11.2.
Waterlogging affects about 15% of the maize (Zea mays L.)-producing area, which reduces the yield by 20–30% (Du et al. 2017). It affects about 10–15 MH of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-sown area, which results in yield losses of 20–50% (Manik et al. 2019). Flash floods and submergence affect more than 16% of the world’s rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropland (Neog et al. 2016). Waterlogging affects between 10 and 15 million acres of wheat worldwide each year, resulting in yield losses of 20–50% (Aryal et al. 2016). Other grain crops, including barley, canola, lupins, field peas, lentils, and chickpeas, also experience yield losses due to waterlogging.
2 Effects of Waterlogging
Root hypoxia is categorized as a stress that makes tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) sensitive to waterlogging (Hou et al. 2019). However, genetic differences in their resistance to this stress have been found (Safavi-Rizi et al. 2020). Legumes are continually faced with a variety of stresses, the most important of which is waterlogging, which can result in yield losses of between 25 and 30% per year (Pasley et al. 2020).
Submergence in legumes can reduce photosynthesis, prevent biological nitrogen fixation by interfering with nodule development, result in nutritional deficiencies, increase the accumulation of toxic compounds, and, finally, induce plant mortality (Oves et al. 2016). Pigeon pea, cluster bean, lentil, soybean, pistachio, and chickpea are among the legume crops that are susceptible to submersion, mainly during the vegetative phases (Adak et al. 2016).
2.1 Effects of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity
One of the main abiotic stressors that impacts crop development is waterlogging (Lone et al. 2018). In many areas, waterlogging of the soil is a significant abiotic stress that significantly restricts crop development and lowers yield (Tian et al. 2021). It has turned into the primary obstacle to crop production in Australia’s temperate high rainfall zone (HRZ), especially in areas with duplex soils (Ali et al. 2013; Franklin et al. 2020). The loss in the growth rates of some crops due to waterlogging makes crop production insufficient to fulfill the predicted food demand. Water is necessary for all plants to survive, but too much water, waterlogging, or floods causes stress and obstructs the passage of gases between the soil and the environment. Therefore, persistent waterlogging has a deleterious impact on nearly every stage of plant development throughout its life span and ultimately results in yield loss (Wang et al. 2017).
A valuable economic crop with an unpredictable growth habit and frequent waterlogging issues is cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Cotton plant growth and development are negatively impacted by waterlogging stress, as is nutrient uptake. Reduced soil temperature, a less irrigated plowing layer, and decreased nutrient availability all contribute to a decline in the average production in cold, moist rice fields (Liu et al. 2016). Electrical conductivity, oxidation–reduction potential, and pH have all been found to vary in waterlogged soils (Tokarz and Urban 2015; Raja et al. 2022).
2.2 Waterlogging-Induced Anaerobic Respiration
Low oxygen levels (below 21% O2) cause a transition from an oxygenated to a low-energy anaerobic state that supports plant development under waterlogging stress. It entails a number of biochemical adjustments, anaerobic digestion pathways, and the production of protective chemicals for the elimination of phytotoxic metabolites (Evans and Gladish 2017), which are crucial for plant survival under soggy conditions. Anaerobic respiration comes in two types: ethanolic fermentation and lactate fermentation (Du et al. 2017).
Pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) initially converts pyruvate to acetaldehyde in the ethanolic fermentation process, and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) next turns acetaldehyde into ethanol by generating oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) converts pyruvate to lactate during lactate fermentation by utilizing decreased nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) (Zhang et al. 2017). Phytotoxins build up during fermentation, and carbohydrate stores are depleted (Loreti et al. 2016; Pucciariello and Perata 2017). In this situation, plants use glycolysis to generate energy and release sugar reserves that have been accumulated (Loreti et al. 2016). Fermentation’s main feedstocks are water-soluble polysaccharides (WSPs). When the balance between carbohydrate metabolism and photosynthesis is off during waterlogging, the reserves of water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) can be reduced (Jurczyk et al. 2016), and these changes have an impact on the rate of fermentation and the survival of few species (Chen et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2017). Therefore, due to energy depletion, accumulation of phytotoxic chemicals (such lactate), and carbon loss (through ethanol loss from the roots), waterlogging and anaerobic metabolism cause severe growth inhibition and ultimately lead to the death of many plants (Tamang et al. 2014).
2.3 Effects of Waterlogging on Nutrient Composition
The fundamental cause of limited plant growth in damp soil is nutrient inadequacy, which ultimately results in wilting (Onyekachi et al. 2019). Waterlogging prevents the soil from absorbing the majority of necessary nutrients, which results in deficits of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca) (Kathpalia and Bhatla, 2018). According to the early development stage as opposed to a later growth stage, the impacts of waterlogging on N, P, and K nutrition are more pronounced. After 65 days of waterlogging, the N concentration in cotton leaves reduced by 30% (Zhang et al. 2021). According to cotton roots, the stems and leaves had lower concentrations of N, K, and Ca2+ under waterlogging stress but higher amounts of Mn2+, Fe2+, and Mg2+. The decrease in oxygen availability in the root zone, which affects root respiration and, in turn, the capacity of the roots to absorb nutrients may be the cause of this nutritional imbalance. Additionally, roots’ ability to store energy is diminished in waterlogging circumstances, which prevents these nutrients from being actively transported to other organs (Tavanti et al. 2020).
Reduced root respiration under hypoxia may also result in root cell death, a reduction in cell permeability, and prolonged hypoxia, even the total loss of roots. Thus, it is clear that waterlogging prevents most key nutrients from being absorbed, creating a nutritional imbalance, even if other vital elements have been found to accumulate more often. As a result, nutritional imbalance contributes to yield loss under waterlogging conditions. In the presence of hypoxia, a reduction in root respiration may also result in root cell death, a reduction in cell permeability, and, in the case of chronic hypoxia, even in total loss of the roots (Xiao et al. 2020).
2.4 Crop Germination
When waterlogging occurs during seed germination or at the blossoming stage, the seedling dies and no more growth occurs. Sorghum seedling growth is impacted by waterlogging in a short range but increased death rate of seedling (Kyu et al. 2021).
2.5 Crop Morphology
Waterlogging is one of the biggest issues in agricultural productivity, which affects approximately 12% of the world’s agricultural land. Crop productivity is decreased by waterlogging. Maize productivity is decreased as waterlogging periods increase (Huang et al. 2022). When organic substances are broken down, oxygen is required to create energy for productivity. The aerobic bacteria and roots in soil nearly lose most of their capacity to make energy when the oxygen level is low; as a result, they cease growth and may even die (Antar et al. 2021). Most crops and plants on land are aerobic organisms that depend upon the fast availability of oxygen either from underground or from aerial tissues. Waterlogging, which occurs when too much water is absorbed by the soil, severely affects crop development and yield, and, in many parts of the world, it has become a serious abiotic stress (Wei et al. 2013). Flooding or waterlogging inhibits root and shoot growth, reducing the overall yield (Tiryakioglu et al. 2015). Reduction in chemical reactions, energy currency, and other mechanism in crops are shown in Fig. 11.3.
2.6 Crop Productivity
Reduction in crop yield is due to the absence or loss of oxygen and/or denitrification or leaching of nitrogen and diseases can cause damage to the crops (Kaur et al. 2020). According to the stage of the affected crop and the intensity of the floods, the average yield loss due to waterlogging is estimated to be 15–25%, but it can reach up to 40% (Gomathi et al. 2015). Waterlogging, even when temporary and short-lived, can have a significant impact on the development and production of dry land crops. There is reduction in the dry masses of both the shoots and roots (Robin et al. 2021). There is reduction in root growth due to waterlogging in wheat (Ploschuk et al. 2018). Wheat’s grain production of the winter season can be reduced by almost 20 days at 32–94% by waterlogging, 52% in green gram, and 54% in chickpea (Basu et al. 2019). More number of enzymes such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) have been proven to be harmful to tobacco rice, wheat, mung bean, sunflower, and sweet potato under waterlogging conditions (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2020). Earlier in the season, long-term waterlogging can result in reduction of crop productivity by up to 30% (Liu et al. 2021).
2.7 Crop Physiology
Waterlogging can have an impact on a number of physiological processes, including water and root–shoot hormone absorption interactions (Tong et al. 2021). They also reduce movement of ion across the roots, which results in shortage of nutrients and element toxicity such as in manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), sodium (Na), aluminum (Al), boron (B), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Kathpalia et al. 2018). In wheat, waterlogging decreases the rate of photosynthesis, total productivity, leaf extension, and the number of grains per spike (Du et al. 2023). Under temporary or permanent flooding conditions, quick waterlogging typically first causes deficiency of oxygen (anoxia or hypoxia) in plants and then results in chlorosis, leaf shrinking, and damage of the roots (De Oliveira 2021). Waterlogging causes a shortage in the supply of oxygen, and it has been proved to be dangerous for shoot and root systems (Zhang et al. 2021).
Oxygen-dependent activities are reduced in hypoxia, particularly in anoxia. The physiological interactions between the shoots and roots are changed, and both the uptake of carbon and the use of photosynthates are inhibited, particularly the oxygen internal transport (Nakamura & Noguchi 2020). Root hypoxia creates a photooxidative damage in leaves when production of ROS increases, like hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radicles (OH•), and superoxide, which easily damage the leaf chloroplasts, and, also, yellowing of leaves and senescence occurs. Several well-known enzymes, including APX and SOD, reduce ROS (Kanojia & Dijkwel 2018).
The type and also the physiological age of the organism determine how waterlogging affects the respiratory rate. A higher rate of oxygen uptake in root tips is associated with respiration, which is necessary for other metabolic processes, such as the production of ATP. Under waterlogging conditions, plant roots suffer from hypoxia (a lack of oxygen), which suppresses the rate of metabolism and also lowers ATP synthesis. So, less ATP is produced and less energy is available for root growth, which inhibits vegetative growth. A reduced stomatal aperture decrease under lack of oxygen (hypoxia) also decreases the rate of photosynthesis. Senescence of the leaves, a decrease in chlorophyll concentration, and, ultimately, full inhibition of the photosynthetic process take place (Ding et al. 2022).
Photosynthesis inhibition occurs a few days before the reduction of chlorophyll contents. With more waterlogging, nitrogen contents in the leaves, shoots, and seminal roots reduce. However, adventitious roots’ nitrogen content rises. Nitrogen is present in an excess amount in adventitious roots, followed by seminal roots because of the nutrient uptake ability of the aerenchyma (Mohammed et al. 2019). If the period of waterlogging increases, it causes more reduction in the photosynthetic activity of sorghum, cotton, and maize (Zhang et al. 2021). The sorghum species, especially germination-stage seeds, are extremely sensitive to water stress because they do not have enough oxygen (Zhang et al. 2020).
Due to a low amount of oxygen, electron transport chain and respiration are reduced, so, as a result, ATP production rate is decreased in sorghum. When the rate of ATP generation slows due to the lack of oxygen, permeability of the cell membrane in sorghum increased. Variations that occur in cotton by waterlogging are reduction of the rate of photosynthetic activity, leaf potential, and reduction in stomatal conductance (Pan et al. 2019). When changes in internal hormones take place, it helps in the internal connection between the shoots and roots and also affects the morphological adaptations of the stressed plants. When aerobic respiration in the root system of sugarcane is low, it negatively impacts nutrient uptake under waterlogging stress, as shown in Fig. 11.4. Moreover, it has been noted that under conditions of waterlogging, in plants, major changes in the morphology, physiology, and anatomy take place (Bhusal et al. 2020).
2.8 The Impact of Waterlogging on Different Compounds
The velocity of gas exchange between the atmosphere and the soil slows down due to the presence of too much water in the soil, which also impacts plant production and growth (Andrade et al. 2018; Garcia et al. 2020). While the amount of oxygen continuously drops due to waterlogging, methane, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and ethylene increase at a rapid rate (Tyagi et al. 2022). This severely disturbs the stability of gas levels, makes a hypoxia or even anoxia conditions. It also lowers the capacity of soil for decline and also interferes with the exchange of minerals (Li et al. 2022). The absence of oxygen also reduces the aerobic nitrification and activity of the nitrifying bacteria, and, thus, conversion of nitrate into nitrogen is reduced, which results in nutrient loss (Walker et al. 2018). Additionally, under conditions of waterlogging, sulfate is quickly converted to hydrogen sulfide, thus decreasing the quantity of sulfur that plants can absorb and making them poisonous. Waterlogging also decreases oxidized substances like Fe2+ and Mn4+, increasing the concentration of iron and manganese above what plants need for their nourishment (Kathpalia and Bhatla 2018).
2.9 Effects of Waterlogging on the Anatomy of Crops
Under waterlogging conditions, root diameter, aerenchyma number, aerenchyma width, cortex thickness, and stele width all decrease in rice plants. During flooding, the rhizosphere’s limited oxygen supply has adverse effects on the plant roots. Due to the absence of oxygen, the soil increases the formation of the aerenchyma. The root aerenchyma of forage grass (Brachiaria spp.) is inhibited due to flooding conditions. The cortex thickness as well as the stele and diameter of the roots decrease due to flooding conditions as in rice crops (Fe et al. 2020).
3 Strategies for Improving Waterlogging Tolerance in Plants
The ability of plants to tolerate waterlogging depends on their type, water level depth, development stage at the time of waterlogging, and variety (Kaur et al. 2020). Plants can avoid the stress of waterlogging by increasing the synthesis of ethylene that leads to the formation of the aerenchyma, and, also, the surfaces of roots and adventitious roots become stronger due to this adaptative ability of plants (Wu et al. 2022).
4 Response of Plants to Hypoxic Conditions
Fundamentally, the response of plants to hypoxic conditions can be separated into three phases.
-
Plant efficiently produces a group of components involved in signal transduction, and the second stage is activating.
-
A metabolic adjustment occurs, which then gets involved in the fermentation process.
-
The third stage depends on the strength of the plants and is involved in changing their morphology such as aerenchyma formation and root formation (Wei et al. 2013).
At their morphological and physiological stages, plants adopt different mechanisms or methods to prevent waterlogging or oxygen shortage. Some plants produce metabolic energy through the fermentation process in response to hypoxia rather than through oxidative respiration. The LDH, ADH and PDC are the parts of anaerobic proteins (ANPs) and they play a key role when respiration shifts from the aerobic to the anaerobic state. In order to maintain glycolytic metabolism under hypoxia, PDC catalyzes the irreversible changes of acetaldehyde from pyruvate and ADH transforms acetaldehyde to ethanol and stimulates NAD+ (Borrego-Benjumea et al. 2020). From the transfer of pyruvate to lactate, LDH also creates NAD+ (Farhana & Lappin 2023). Since the concentration of lactic acid is more harmful than alcohol, the change from alcohol to lactic acid production gives plants the capacity to survive under low oxygen conditions without having any cell injury, and this is regarded as a significant factor. Enzymes such as CAT and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) are envolved in controlling the levels of internal hydrogen peroxide (Anand et al. 2019).
5 Adaptations of Plants to Waterlogging
5.1 Morphological and Anatomical Adaptations
The majority of plants are resistant to waterlogging because it significantly reduces the rates at which oxygen and carbon dioxide diffuse through their roots and stems, inhibiting both respiration and photosynthesis. Under waterlogging conditions, certain plants undergo morphological changes; these plants alleviate the decline in the respiratory mechanism and injury caused by disturbing the energy metabolism. So, formation of the aerenchyma and adventitious roots is an important morphological adaptation, as shown in Fig. 11.4 (Pan et al. 2021).
5.2 Aerenchyma and Adventitious Root Formation
Waterlogging-induced adventitious root formation is a key process. This phenomenon is common in various plant species, including Zea nicaraguensis, tomato, cucumber, soybean, and wheat (Xu et al. 2017). Under hypoxic stress, new adventitious roots help in nutrient and water intake (Matsuura et al. 2022). The development of aerial roots to improve the period of waterlogging is specific for each species and depends upon water temperature, the growth period of the plants, and the duration of waterlogging (Liu et al. 2020). Waterlogging stress-sensitive species did not produce adventitious roots, whereas waterlogging-tolerant genotypes formed a greater number of adventitious roots in cucumber (Xu et al. 2017). Adventitious roots stimulated by waterlogging have a significant quantitative trait locus in them (Sanghera et al. 2019). Another characteristic of plants is to respond to water stress by the development of the aerenchyma. The aerenchyma has intercellular space, which helps plant tissues exchange gases and absorb oxygen (Luan et al. 2018). Under hypoxic conditions, the formation of aerenchyma increases in most cereal crops, including wheat, soybean, maize, and barley genotypes, which are waterlogged tolerant. This dramatically increases transparency in roots and also promotes the aerenchyma development in adventitious roots under waterlogging conditions. The aerenchyma develops in wetland plants like rice, not just in the roots but also in the leaves, stalks, and leaf sheaths (Luan et al. 2018).
5.3 Photosynthetic Adaptations
Stomatal conductivity of leaves, stomatal resistance, , closure of the stomata, and carbon dioxide uptake are all decreased when waterlogging occurs (Wu et al. 2022). Therefore, in order to continue growing and developing plants, light and CO2 for photosynthesis are required. Under waterlogging conditions, enzymatic activities relating to photosynthesis decrease, as does chlorophyll synthesis in leaves, resulting in the senescence, shedding, and chlorosis of leaves; inhibition of new leaf development; decrease in the photosynthetic rate; and, eventually, plant death (Wu & Yang 2016). In the majority of plants, the main products of photosynthesis are sucrose and starch. The primary transport carbohydrate from the source to sink organs is sucrose, and this pathway is highly susceptible to waterlogging. The boll weight of cotton exposed to water was immediately decreased by decreasing the rate of photosynthesis, rate of transport of sucrose, and the primary activity of rubisco (Sun et al. 2022).
5.4 Adaptive Features in Tree Species
Tree species that live in habitats that face floods on a regular basis have developed a wide variety of adaptation techniques to deal with the stress caused by this waterlogging (Campbell et al. 2021). In reaction to floods, several flood-tolerant species have grown enlarged lenticels at the base of the stems (Messina & Conner 2019). In addition to allowing the plant to absorb oxygen, enlarged lenticels regulate the stem’s release of gaseous chemicals into the atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide, acetaldehyde, and ethanol. Formation of adventitious roots is also an adaptive feature against waterlogging stress (Mui et al. 2021).
5.5 Adaptive Features in Soybeans and Figs
Soybean plants are capable of adapting to waterlogged soils by developing root systems and secondary aerenchyma (Goulart et al. 2020). Waterlogging stops roots from receiving oxygen, which limits respiration and significantly lowers a cell’s energy status. So, to maintain ATP production, plants have adopted features under waterlogging stress conditions for the metabolic conversion of oxidative phosphorylation into anaerobic fermentation within their roots (Kaur et al. 2021). The fermentation pathways play an important role in adopting waterlogging tolerance strategies because they show a positive response when the amount of oxygen is low, but they are not used when aerobic conditions are present. So, if the fermenting pathways of plants are more effective, then they are more tolerant to waterlogging stress. Under wet stress conditions, lactic acid and ethanol are the two important fermentation pathways; two main enzymes are also involved, namely, LDH and ADH (Jitsuyama 2017).
5.6 Adaptive Features in Rice
In rice, the ratios of the cortex to the stem and the aerenchyma to the cortex relate to gaseous spaces and are necessary for the root’s high capacity for oxygen transport. Transport of oxygen from the base of the shoots to the tips of the roots occurs (Yamauchi et al. 2019). Rice could develop a lysigenous aerenchyma process and barriers to the generation of radial O2 loss (ROL) as an adaptive mechanism to waterlogging (Yamauchi et al. 2019).
5.7 Hormonal Adaptations
Waterlogging impacts the growth of the shoots by affecting root development. It disrupts the grain filling and consequently cause a decline in grain production (Wollmer et al., 2018). Due to waterlogging, abscisic acid hormones increases, while gibberellic acid and cytokinins decrease, resulting in a disturbance in the internal hormonal balance in plants. So, to avoid this situation, the hormones are applied exogenously. By stimulating a number of defense mechanisms, it has been discovered that phytohormones like cytokinin and gibberellic acid lessen the negative effects of waterlogging on crops. When cytokinin is exogenously applied, it raises its endogenous levels in plants, delays the aging of leaves, and improves photosynthetic efficiency, all of which would improve crop production. So, to overcome the negative effects in mung bean by waterlogging, cytokinin and gibberellic acid can be applied in the form of foliar treatment (Islam et al. 2021). Ethylene is a primary regulating hormone that helps combat the stress caused by waterlogging. In submerged shoot and root tissues, ethylene is produced from precursors 1-carboxylic acid (ACC) and 1-aminocyclopropane (Bashar 2018; Zeng et al. 2020).
6 Conclusions
Waterlogging is a serious problem to agriculture and reduces crop production and yield all over the world and also in Pakistan. It exerts deleterious effects on different crops. Cereal crops like barley, rice, wheat, maize, and oat are the major crops affected by waterlogging. It has major effects on the productivity of crops. It also affects the morphology, physiology, and anatomy of most crops. It induces anaerobic respiration and nutrient composition in plants. Different growth stages, especially the seedling stage, are disturbed by waterlogging. It also disturbs the photosynthetic activity in plants and different compounds in soil. Under severe conditions, these crops can survive by adopting tolerance strategies such as aerenchyma, and adventitious root formation occurs in plants as a morphological adaptation. Some species can tolerate this water stress, but most of them are sensitive to it. Plants that can survive under water stress conditions do so because they have an adaptation mechanism.
References
Adak T, Kumar K, Singh VK (2016) An Appraisal of seasonal variations in thermal indices, heat and water use efficiency in mango. In: Climate change and its implications on Crop production and food security. Mahima Research Foundation and Social Welfare/Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, pp 183–188
Ali H, Iqbal N, Shahzad AN, Sarwar N, Ahmad S, Mehmood A (2013) Seed priming improves irrigation water use efficiency, yield, and yield components of late-sown wheat under limited water conditions. Turk J Agric For 37:534–544
Anand A, Kumari A, Thakur M, Koul A (2019) Hydrogen peroxide signaling integrates with phytohormones during the germination of magneto-primed tomato seeds. Sci Rep 9(1):1–11
Andrade CA, de Souza KRD, de Santos MO, da Silva DM, Alves JD (2018) Hydrogen peroxide promotes the tolerance of soybeans to waterlogging. Sci Hortic 232:40–45
Antar M, Lyu D, Nazari M, Shah A, Zhou X, Smith DL (2021) Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: an overview of world biomass production and utilization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 139:110–691
Aryal JP, Sapkota TB, Stirling CM, Jat ML, Jat HS, Rai M, Mittal S, Sutaliya JM (2016) Conservation agriculture-based wheat production better copes with extreme climate events than conventional tillage-based systems: a case of untimely excess rainfall in Haryana, India. Agric Ecosys Environ 233:325–335
Ashraf M, Javaid M, Rashid T, Ayub M, Zafar A, Ali S, Naeem M (2011) Replacement of expensive pure nutritive media with low cost commercial fertilizers for mass culture of freshwater algae, chlorella vulgaris. Int J Agric Biol 13:4
Bashar KK (2018) Hormone dependent survival mechanisms of plants during post-waterlogging stress. Plant Signal Behav 13:10
Basu PS, Pratap A, Gupta S, Sharma K, Tomar R, Singh NP (2019) Physiological traits for shortening crop duration and improving productivity of greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) under high temperature. Front Plant Sci 10:1508
Bhusal N, Kim HS, Han SG, Yoon TM (2020) Photosynthetic traits and plant–water relations of two apple cultivars grown as bi-leader trees under long-term waterlogging conditions. Environ Exp Bot 176:104–111
Borrego-Benjumea A, Carter A, Tucker JR, Yao Z, Xu W, Badea A (2020) Genome-wide analysis of gene expression provides new insights into waterlogging responses in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plants 9(2):240
Campbell LK, Cheng H, Svendsen E, Kochnower D, Bunting-Howarth K, Wapnitsky P (2021) Living with Water Documenting lived experience and social-emotional impacts of chronic flooding for local adaptation planning. Cities Environ 14(1):4
Chen C, Ke J, Zhou XE, Yi W, Brunzelle JS, Li J, Yong E-L, Xu HE, Melcher K (2013) Structural basis for molecular recognition of folic acid by folate receptors. Nat 500(7463):486–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12327
Choudhary AK, Sultana R, Vales MI, Saxena KB, Kumar RR, Ratnakumar P (2018) Integrated physiological and molecular approaches to improvement of abiotic stress tolerance in two pulse crops of the semi-arid tropics. Crop J 6:99–114
De Oliveira MR (2021) Screening and breeding soybean for flood tolerance. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Ding F, Wang C, Xu N, Zhang S, Wang M (2022) SlMYC2 mediates jasmonate-induced tomato leaf senescence by promoting chlorophyll degradation and repressing carbon fixation. Plant Physiol Biochem 180:27–34
Dollinger J, Jose S (2018) Agroforestry for soil health. Agrofor Syst 92(2):213–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0223-9
Doupis G, Kavroulakis N, Psarras G, Papadakis I (2017) Growth, photosynthetic performance and antioxidative response of ‘Hass’ and ‘Fuerte’avocado (Persea americana Mill.) plants grown under high soil moisture. Photosynthetica 55:655–663
Du X-b, Min X, Zhi W, Chen X-f, WU W-g, Kong L-c (2023) Raised bed planting promotes grain number per spike in wheat grown after rice by improving spike differentiation and enhancing photosynthetic capacity. J Integr Agric 22(6):1631–1644
Du H, Zhu J, Su H, Huang M, Wang H, Ding S, Zhang B, Luo A, Wei S, Tian X, Xu Y (2017) Bulked segregant RNA-seq reveals differential expression and SNPs of candidate genes associated with waterlogging tolerance in maize. Front Plant Sci 8:1022
Evans D, Gladish D (2017) Plant responses to waterlogging. Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences 1:36–39
Farhana A, Lappin SL (2023) Biochemistry lactate dehydrogenase. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC., Treasure Island (FL), Florida.
Fe K, Turhadi T, Hamim GM, Miftahudin M (2020) Morpho-physiological and anatomical character changes of rice under waterlogged and water-saturated acidic and high Fe content soil. Sains Malays 49(10):2411–2424
Franklin HM, Carroll AR, Chen C, Maxwell P, Burford MA (2020) Plant source and soil interact to determine characteristics of dissolved organic matter leached into waterways from riparian leaf litter. Sci Total Environ 703:134–530
Fukao T, Barrera-Figueroa BE, Juntawong P, Peña-Castro JM (2019) Submergence and waterlogging stress in plants: a review highlighting research opportunities and understudied aspects. Front Plant Sci 10:340
Garcia N, da Silva CJ, Cocco KLT, Pomagualli D, de Oliveira FK, da Silva JVL (2020) Waterlogging tolerance of five soybean genotypes through different physiological and biochemical mechanisms. Environ Exp Bot 172:103–975
Gomathi R, Gururaja Rao PN, Chandran K, Selvi A (2015) Adaptive responses of sugarcane to waterlogging stress: an over view. Sugar Tech 17(4):325–338
Goulart RZ, Reichert JM, Rodrigues MF (2020) Cropping poorly-drained lowland soils Alternatives to rice monoculture, their challenges and management strategies. Agri Sys 177:102–715
Harris RH, Armstrong RD, Wallace AJ, Belyaeva ON (2016) Delaying nitrogen fertilizer application improves wheat 15N recovery from high rainfall cropping soils in South Eastern Australia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 106:113–128
Hartman S, Liu Z, van Veen H, Vicente J, Reinen E, Martopawiro S, Zhang H, van Dongen N, Bosman F, Bassel GW, Visser EJW, Bailey-Serres J, Theodoulou FL, Hebelstrup KH, Gibbs DJ, Holdsworth MJ, Sasidharan R, Voesenek LACJ (2019) Ethylene-mediated nitric oxide depletion pre-adapts plants to hypoxia stress. Nat Commun 10:4020
Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MHM, Zulfiqar F, Raza A, Mohsin SM, Mahmud JA, Fotopoulos V (2020) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 9(8):681
Hou Y, Jiang F, Zheng X, Wu Z (2019) Identification and analysis of oxygen responsive microRNAs in the root of wild tomato (S. habrochaites). BMC Plant Biol 19:1–13
Huang C, Gao Y, Qin A, Liu Z, Zhao B, Ning D, Liu Z (2022) Effects of waterlogging at different stages and durations on maize growth and grain yields. Agri Water Manag 261:107–334
Islam MR, Hasan M, Akter N, Akhtar S (2021) Cytokinin and gibberellic acid alleviate the effect of waterlogging in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. wilczek). J Clean WAS 5(1):21–26
Javaid MM, Waheed H, Nazami N, Ashraf M, Li FM, Tanveer A (2020) Response of chickpea to foliar supply of Hoagland’s solution under rain-fed condition. Semina Ciências Agrárias 41:3053–3066
Javaid MM, Florentine SK, Ashraf M, Mahmood A, Sattar A, Wasaya A, Li FM (2022a) Photosynthetic activity and water use efficiency of Salvia verbenaca L. under elevated CO2 and water-deficit conditions. J Agron Crop Sci 208:536–551
Javaid MM, Wang X, Florentine SK, Ashraf M, Mahmood A, Li FM, Fiaz S (2022b) Effects on photosynthetic response and biomass productivity of Acacia longifolia ssp. longifolia under elevated CO2 and water-limited regimes. Front Plant Sci 13:817730
Jia L, Qin X, Lyu D, Qin S, Zhang P (2019) ROS production and scavenging in three cherry rootstocks under short-term waterlogging conditions. Sci Hortic 257:108647
Jitsuyama Y (2017) Hypoxia-responsive root hydraulic conductivity influences soybean cultivar-specific waterlogging tolerance. Am J Plant Sci 8(04):770
Jurczyk K, Nietzsche S, Ender C, Sculean A, Eick S (2016) In-vitro activity of sodium-hypochlorite gel on bacteria associated with periodontitis. Clin Oral Investig 20(8):2165–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1711-9
Kanojia A, Dijkwel PP (2018) Abiotic stress responses are governed by reactive oxygen species and age. In: Annual plant reviews online. Wiley, pp 295–326
Karimi V, Karami E, Keshavarz M (2018) Climate change and agriculture: Impacts and adaptive responses in Iran. J Integr Agric 17:1–15
Kathpalia R, Bhatla SC (2018) Plant mineral nutrition. In: Plant physiology, development and metabolism. Springer, Singapore, pp 37–81
Kathpalia S, Arora D, Sandhu N, Sinha P (2018) Ectopic pregnancy: Review of 80 cases. Med J Armed Forces India 74(2):172–176
Kaur G, Orlowski J, Carter T (2018) Advances in flood-tolerant varieties of soybean Wu C, Mozzoni L, Hummer W University of Arkansas, USA; Chen P, Shannon G, Ye H, Nguyen HT University of Missouri, USA; USDA-ARS, USA; Buckley B, Louisiana State University, USA. In: Achieving sustainable cultivation of soybeans. vol 1. Burleigh Dodds Sci Publishing, 233–252
Kaur G, Singh G, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA, Orlowski JM, Golden BR (2020) Impacts and management strategies for crop production in waterlogged or flooded soils: a review. Agron J 112:1475–1501
Kubik Z, Maurel M (2016) Weather shocks, agricultural production and migration: evidence from Tanzania. J Dev Stud 52:665–680
Kyu KL, Malik AI, Colmer TD, Siddique KHM, Erskine W (2021) Response of Mungbean (cvs. Celera II-AU and Jade-AU) and Blackgram (cv. Onyx-AU) to Transient Waterlogging. Front Plant Sci 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.709102
Leonardo C (2019) The food loss reduction advantage: building sustainable food systems
Li H, Zhang H, Yang Y, Fu G, Tao L, Xiong J (2022) Effects and oxygen-regulated mechanisms of water management on cadmium (Cd) accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa). Sci Total Environ 846:157–484
Liliane TN, Charles MS (2020) Factors affecting yield of crops. Agro Clim Change Food Sec 15:9
Liu Y-Y, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi L-X, Zhang R, Spencer J, Doi Y, Tian G, Dong B, Huang X (2016) Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis 16(2):161–168
Liu S, Wang X, Liu M, Zhu J (2017) Towards better analysis of machine learning models: A visual analytics perspective. Vis Inform 1(1):48–56
Liu K, Harrison MT, Shabala S, Meinke H, Ahmed I, Zhang Y, Tian X, Zhou M (2020) The state of the art in modeling waterlogging impacts on plants: what do we know and what do we need to know. Earth’s Fut 8:e2020EF001801
Liu K, Harrison MT, Archontoulis SV, Huth N, Yang R, Li Liu D, Yan H, Meinke H, Huber I, Feng P (2021) Climate change shifts forward flowering and reduces crop water logging stress. Environ Res Lett 16:094017
Lone AA, Khan MH, Dar ZA, Wani SH (2018) Breeding strategies for improving growth and yield under waterlogging conditions in maize: a review. Maydica 61:11
Loreti E, van Veen H, Perata P (2016) Plant responses to flooding stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 33:64–71
Luan H, Guo B, Pan Y, Lv C, Shen H, Xu R (2018) Morpho-anatomical and physiological responses to waterlogging stress in different barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes. Plant Growth Regul 85(3):399–409
Manik S, Pengilley G, Dean G, Field B, Shabala S, Zhou M (2019) Soil and crop management practices to minimize the impact of waterlogging on crop productivity. Front Plant Sci 10:140
Matsuura A, Kato Y, Suzuki T, Murata K, An P (2022) Hypoxia tolerance of four millet species is attributable to constitutive aerenchyma formation and root hair development of adventitious roots. Plant Prod Sci 25:1–15
Mehmood A, Tanveer A, Javed MM, Nadeem MA, Naeem M, Abbas T (2018) Estimation of economic threshold level of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.) to tackle grain quality and yield losses in rice. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64:208–218
Menéndez P, Losada IJ, Torres-Ortega S, Narayan S, Beck MW (2020) The global flood protection benefits of mangroves. Sci Rep 10:1–11
Messina MG, Conner WH (2019) Adaptations of plants to flooding and soil waterlogging. In: Southern forested wetlands. Routledge, pp 173–203
Mohammed U, Caine RS, Atkinson JA, Harrison EL, Wells D, Chater CC, Murchie EH (2019) Rice plants overexpressing OsEPF1 show reduced stomatal density and increased root cortical aerenchyma formation. Sci Rep 9(1):1–13
Mui NT, Zhou M, Parsons D, Smith RW (2021) Aerenchyma formation in adventitious roots of tall fescue and cocksfoot under waterlogged conditions. Agronomy 11(12):24–87
Nakamura M, Noguchi K (2020) Tolerant mechanisms to O2 deficiency under submergence conditions in plants. J Plant Res 133(3):343–371
Neog P, Sarma PK, Chary GR, Dutta S, Rajbongshi R, Sarmah K, Baruah S, Sarma D, Sarma MK, Borah P, Rao CS (2016) Building climate resilient agriculture through traditional floating rice in flash flood affected areas of the North bank plains zone of Assam
Onyekachi OG, Boniface OO, Gemlack NF, Nicholas N (2019) The effect of climate change on abiotic plant stress: a review. In: Abiotic biotic stress plants, p 17. IntechOpen, London, SW7 2QJ, UK
Oves M, Saghir Khan M, Huda Qari A, Nadeen Felemban M, Almeelbi T (2016) Heavy metals: biological importance and detoxification strategies. J Bioremed Biodegr 7:1–15
Pampana S, Masoni A, Arduini I (2016) Grain yield of durum wheat as affected by waterlogging at tillering. Cereal Res Commun 44:706–716
Pan R, Jiang W, Wang Q, Xu L, Shabala S, Zhang WY (2019) Differential response of growth and photosynthesis in diverse cotton genotypes under hypoxia stress. Photosynthetica 57(3):772–779
Pan J, Sharif R, Xu X, Chen X (2021) Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in plants: research progress and prospects. Front Plant Sci 11:331–627
Pasley HR, Huber I, Castellano MJ, Archontoulis SV (2020) Modeling flood-induced stress in soybeans. Front Plant Sci 11:11
Phukan UJ, Mishra S, Shukla RK (2016) Waterlogging and submergence stress: affects and acclimation. Crit Rev Biotechnol 36:956–966
Ploschuk RA, Miralles DJ, Colmer TD, Ploschuk EL, Striker GG (2018) Waterlogging of winter crops at early and late stages: impacts on leaf physiology, growth and yield. Front Plant Sci 9:18–63
Pucciariello C, Perata P (2017) New insights into reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide signalling under low oxygen in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 40(4):473–482
Raja S, Mahmood A, Alamery S, Cheema HM, Javaid A, Alvi AK, Siddique F, Aslam MM, Khan MT, Attia KA, Kimiko I (2022) Physicochemical, molecular and cultural identification of Microbial pathogens in wastewater irrigated crops. Pol J Environ Stud 31:3779–3787
Ramirez-Cabral NYZ, Kumar L, Taylor S (2016) Crop niche modeling projects major shifts in common bean growing areas. Agric For Meteorol 218:102–113
Robin AHK, Ghosh S, Shahed M (2021) PEG-induced osmotic stress alters root morphology and root hair traits in wheat genotypes. Plan Theory 10(6):10–42
Safavi-Rizi V, Herde M, Stohr C (2020) RNA-Seq reveals novel genes and pathways associated with hypoxia duration and tolerance in tomato root. Sci Rep 10:1692
Sanghera GS, Jamwal NS (2019) Perspective for genetic amelioration of sugarcane towards water logged conditions. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 7:484–502
Sanghera C, Wong LM, Panahi M, Sintou A, Hasham M, Sattler S (2019) Cardiac phenotype in mouse models of systemic autoimmunity. Dis Model Mech 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.036947
Sarwar RA, Ashraf M, Javaid MM (2018) Response of foliar-applied nutrient solution with and without soil-applied fertilizers on growth and yield of mung bean. J Plant Nutr 41:1083–1093
Shahzad T, Ashraf M, Javaid MM, Waheed H, Abbas T, Sattar FM (2018) Influence of field soil drought stress on some key physiological, yield and quality traits of selected newly-developed hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Sains Malays 47:2625–2635
Shrestha A, Anwar MP, Islam AM, Gurung T, Dhakal S, Tanveer A, Javaid MM, Nadeem M, Ikram NA (2021) Weed science as a new discipline and its status in some South Asian universities and colleges: examples from Bangladesh. CABI Review, Bhutan
Stott PA, Christidis N, Otto FE, Sun Y, Vanderlinden JP, van Oldenborgh GJ, Vautard R, von Storch H, Walton P, Yiou P, Zwiers FW (2016) Attribution of extreme weather and climate-related events. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 7:23–41
Sun M, Li P, Wang N, Zheng C, Sun X, Dong H, Zhang Y (2022) Soil available phosphorus deficiency reduces boll biomass and lint yield by affecting sucrose metabolism in cotton-boll subtending leaves. Agric 12(5):10–65
Sundgren TK, Uhlen AK, Lillemo M, Briese C, Wojciechowski T (2018) Rapid seedling establishment and a narrow root stele promotes waterlogging tolerance in spring wheat. J Plant Physiol 227:45–55
Tamang BG, Magliozzi JO, Maroof MAS, Fukao T (2014) Physiological and transcriptomic characterization of submergence and reoxygenation responses in soybean seedlings. Plant Cell Environ 37(10):2350–2365. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12277
Tavanti RFR, David Queiroz G, Caroline Da Rocha Silva A, Moya Peres W, Pereira Paixão A, Galindo FS, Martins Silva V, Bossolani JW, Moreira Melero M, De Souza OG (2020) Changes in photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants in response to manganese stress. Arch Agr Soil Sci 66:743–762
Tian LX, Zhang YC, Chen PL, Zhang FF, Li J, Yan F, Dong Y, Feng BL (2021) How does the waterlogging regime affect crop yield? A global meta-analysis. Front Plant Sci 12:634898
Tiryakioglu M, Karanlik S, Arsalan M (2015) Response of bread-wheat seedlings to waterlogging stress. Turk J Agric For 39:1–10
Tong C, Hill CB, Zhou G, Zhang XQ, Jia Y, Li C (2021) Opportunities for improving waterlogging tolerance in cereal crops—physiological traits and genetic mechanisms. Plan Theory 10:1560
Tokarz E, Urban D (2015) Soil redox potential and its impact on microorganisms and plants of wetlands. J Ecol Eng 16(3):20–30
Tyagi A, Sharma S, Ali S, Gaikwad K (2022) Crosstalk between H2S and NO: an emerging signalling pathway during waterlogging stress in legume crops. Plant Biol 24:576–586
Walker RP, Benincasa P, Battistelli A, Moscatello S, Tecsi L, Leegood RC (2018) Gluconeogenesis and nitrogen metabolism in maize. Plant Physiol Biochem 130:324–333
Wang X, Deng Z, Zhang W, Meng Z, Chang X, Lv M (2017) Effect of waterlogging duration at different growth stages on the growth, yield and quality of cotton. Plant Soil 12:e0169029
Wei W, Yang S, Zhou H, Lieberwirth I, Feng X, Müllen K (2013) 3D Graphene Foams Cross-linked with Preencapsulated Fe3O4 Nanospheres for Enhanced Lithium Storage. Adv Mater 25(21):2909–2914. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201300445
Wollmer AC, Pitann B, Mühling KH (2018) Waterlogging events during stem elongation or flowering affect yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) but not seed quality. J Agron Crop Sci 204:165–174
Wu YS, Yang CY (2016) Physiological responses and expression profile of NADPH oxidase in Rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings under different levels of submergence. Rice 9:2
Wu J, Wang J, Hui W, Zhao F, Wang P, Su C, Gong W (2022) Physiology of plant responses to water stress and related genes: a review. Forests 13:324
Xiao Y, Wu X, Sun M, Peng F (2020) Hydrogen sulfide alleviates waterlogging-induced damage in peach seedlings via enhancing the antioxidative system and inhibiting ethylene synthesis. Front Plant Sci 11:696
Xu XW, Ji J, Xu Q, XH Q, Chen XH (2017) Inheritance and quantitative trail loci mapping of adventitious root numbers in cucumber seedlings under waterlogging conditions. Mol Gen Genomics 292:353
Yamauchi T, Abe F, Tsutsumi N, Nakazono M (2019) Root cortex provides a venue for gas-space formation and is essential for plant adaptation to waterlogging. Front Plant Sci 10:259
Yan K, Zhao S, Cui M, Han G, Wen P (2018) Vulnerability of photosynthesis and photosystem I in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) exposed to waterlogging. Plant Physiol Biochem 125:239–246
Yin D, Sun D, Han Z, Ni D, Norris A, Jiang CZ (2019) PhERF2, an ethylene-responsive element binding factor, plays an essential role in waterlogging tolerance of petunia. Hortic Res 6:1
Zhang Y, Chen Y, Lu H, Kong X, Dai J, Li Z, Dong H (2016) Growth, lint yield and changes in physiological attributes of cotton under temporal waterlogging. Field Crops Res 194:83–93
Zhang M, He S, Qin B, Jin X, Wang M, Ren C, Zhang Y (2020) Exogenous melatonin reduces the inhibitory effect of osmotic stress on antioxidant properties and cell ultrastructure at germination stage of soybean. PLoS One 15(12):e0243537
Zhang Y, Liu G, Dong H, Li C (2021) Waterlogging stress in cotton: damage, adaptability, alleviation strategies, and mechanisms. Crop J 9:257–270
Zhang A, Wang KCP, Li B, Yang E, Dai X, Peng Y, Fei Y, Liu Y, Li JQ, Chen C (2017) Automated Pixel-Level Pavement Crack Detection on 3D Asphalt Surfaces Using a Deep-Learning Network. Comput -Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 32(10):805–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12297
Zheng X, Zhou J, Tan DX, Wang N, Wang L, Shan D, Kong J (2017) Melatonin improves waterlogging tolerance of Malus baccata (Linn.) Borkh. seedlings by maintaining aerobic respiration, photosynthesis and ROS migration. Front Plant Sci 8:483
Zeng F, Huang Y, Guo Y, Yin M, Chen X, Xiao L, Deng G (2020) Association of inflammatory markers with the severity of COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis 96:467–474
Zhou M, Li H, Mendham N (2007) Combining ability of waterlogging tolerance in barley. Crop Sci 47:278–284
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Majeed, J.A. et al. (2023). Waterlogging and Crop Productivity. In: Hasanuzzaman, M. (eds) Climate-Resilient Agriculture, Vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37424-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37424-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37423-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37424-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)